The Thesis Work, Starting from the Second Page of the Core Volume

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Thesis Work, Starting from the Second Page of the Core Volume DOI: 10.15774/PPKE.JAK.2017.003 The present Doctoral Dissertation is being published, as a monograph in the United States. With respect to the right of first publication, taking into account the publisher’s copyright interests and policy, the Doctoral School electronically made unreadable every other page of the thesis work, starting from the second page of the core volume. Along with this, the Doctoral Dissertation is entirety accessible at the Libraries of the Doctoral School and the Faculty of Law and Political Sciences of Pázmány Péter Catholic University. DOI: 10.15774/PPKE.JAK.2017.003 THE SPECIFIC ASPECTS OF PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF DIPLOMATIC AGENTS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW: THEORY AND PRACTICE Natália DVORNYICSENKÓ Doctoral Dissertation Supervisor: Prof. Péter KOVÁCS, DSc. Pázmány Péter Catholic University Faculty of Law and Political Sciences Doctoral School of Law and Political Sciences Budapest 2017 1 DOI: 10.15774/PPKE.JAK.2017.003 Dedication to my beloved parents with profound gratitude. 2 DOI: 10.15774/PPKE.JAK.2017.003 Acknowledgements The present dissertation is a result of my enduring interest in diplomacy – including its history, advancement and legal specifics. This interest has grown out of my professional experience in the field of diplomacy and international relations. No research achievement is independent from the research environment, mentors and advisers, of course. First of all, I wish to thank my supervisor Professor Péter Kovács for the invaluable counsel and for sharing his expertise, also support all the way, who has been guiding me for the second time already, after my Master thesis on the topic of contemporary diplomacy. My sincere gratitude also goes to Professor Vanda Lamm, whose help, suggestions and encouragement I really appreciate. I am very grateful to the Doctoral School of Law and Political Sciences for the gained knowledge, support in research and professional administration. Furthermore, I am thankful for the assistance of library staff and experts of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Hungary, the Library of the Hungarian National Assembly, the Bodleian Law Library at the University of Oxford, the Libraries of the London Metropolitan University and the Harvard Law School Library, who helped make my research on diplomacy more effective. Above all, I would like to thank my parents for their endless support throughout this project. My father, Professor Vadim Viktorovich Dvornichenko, is a constant source of inspiration and motivation, due to his scientific path and academic results. 3 DOI: 10.15774/PPKE.JAK.2017.003 Disclaimer Diplomatic relations are official relations, carried out between the states through qualified state agents – permanent representatives or so called career diplomats, who perform the greater part of diplomatic activity, serving as a medium for the conduct of international relations. State agents may be heads of state, heads of government, ministers of foreign affairs, special representatives, representatives of international organizations and third parties. Seeing that the range of topics for a dissertation on privileges and immunities of diplomatic agents may be extremely diverse, it is necessary to provide a precise scope of the research work. For that reason, in the present thesis diplomacy law is taken in narrow sense, applied to career or professional diplomats – public servants with a continuous professional connection to the state’s ministry of foreign affairs, members of permanent diplomatic missions, within the meaning of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, done at Vienna on 18 April, 1961. In view of that, the sources of international and diplomacy law considered in the present work are those, related exclusively to career diplomats. Correspondingly, „diplomatic privileges and immunities”, examined at this juncture are those, attributed to career diplomats only and they are used, with respect to the present dissertation, specifically in this interpretation. Diplomatic privileges of other state officials are, accordingly, beyond the scope of this study. 4 DOI: 10.15774/PPKE.JAK.2017.003 Table of contents Dedication .................................................................................................................................. 2 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... 3 Disclaimer .................................................................................................................................. 4 Table of contents ........................................................................................................................ 5 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 8 I. Background of the study ....................................................................................................... 12 I. 1. Statement of the problem .............................................................................................. 12 I. 2. Relevance and aims of the research .............................................................................. 16 I. 3. Summary of the thesis ................................................................................................... 18 I. 4. Methodology and sources ............................................................................................. 18 II. Sources and subjects of diplomacy law, with regard to diplomatic privileges and immunities ................................................................................................................................ 23 II. 1. Formal sources of diplomacy law, originating from international law ....................... 23 II. 1. 1. International custom ............................................................................................... 25 II. 1. 2. International conventions ........................................................................................ 30 II. 2. Supplementary sources of diplomacy law, originating from judicial decisions and national legislation ............................................................................................................... 37 II. 2. 1. Judicial decisions at international level .................................................................. 37 II. 2. 2. National legislation ................................................................................................. 41 II. 2. 3. Judicial decisions at national level .......................................................................... 47 III. Theoretical basis of the institution of diplomatic privileges and immunities .................... 52 III. 1. The origin of the métier of the diplomat and the institution of diplomatic privileges and immunities ..................................................................................................................... 52 III. 1. 1. The basic concepts and terms of diplomacy, with regard to diplomatic privileges and immunities .................................................................................................................... 52 III. 1. 2. The evolution of the institution of diplomatic privileges and immunities from ancient times until the eighteenth century ........................................................................... 57 III. 1. 3. The advancement of the institution of diplomatic privileges and immunities from the nineteenth century until the contemporary period ......................................................... 77 III. 2. The conceptional clarification of the notion of diplomatic privileges and immunities .............................................................................................................................................. 88 III. 3. The commencement and the termination of diplomatic privileges and immunities 112 5 DOI: 10.15774/PPKE.JAK.2017.003 III. 3. 1. The theoretical and practical aspects of the commencement of diplomatic privileges and immunities .................................................................................................. 112 III. 3. 2. The theoretical and practical aspects of the termination of diplomatic privileges and immunities .................................................................................................................. 119 III. 3. 3. Diplomatic relations with authorities in exile ..................................................... 125 III. 4. The factors of reciprocity and non-discrimination, with regard to diplomatic privileges and immunities .................................................................................................. 126 III. 4. 1. The conceptual clarification of the notion of reciprocity .................................... 126 III. 4. 2. The practical examples of application of the principle of reciprocity ................. 131 III. 4. 3. Secondary, honorary and ceremonial privileges, provided to diplomatic agents, on the basis of reciprocity ....................................................................................................... 142 III. 5. Responses and countermeasures of states, with regard to diplomatic privileges and immunities .......................................................................................................................... 145 IV. Personal inviolability of the diplomatic agent: categories of diplomatic immunity ........ 159 IV. 1. Immunity from
Recommended publications
  • Guide to Diplomatic Missions in Turkey
    GUIDE TO DIPLOMATIC MISSIONS IN TURKEY 1 Republic of Turkey Ministry of Foreign Affairs http://www.mfa.gov.tr PREAMBLE ........................................................................................................................................... 6 1. GENERAL INFORMATION .............................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Diplomatic Missions ................................................................................................................. 7 1.2 Consular Posts ......................................................................................................................... 7 1.3 International Organizations ................................................................................................... 7 1.4 Family Members ..................................................................................................................... 8 1.5 Turkish Nationals .................................................................................................................... 8 2. PROTOCOL PROCEDURES FOR THE ARRIVAL OF MEMBERS OF STAFF AT DIPLOMATIC/CONSULAR MISSONS AND INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS .................................... 8 2.1 Notification of Arrival ............................................................................................................. 8 2.2 Identity (ID) Cards ................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.1 Family Members ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Diplomatic Immunity Number: 610
    TAKOMA PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT - GENERAL ORDERS TITLE: DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY NUMBER: 610 EFFECTIVE DATE: August 6, 2012 REVIEW DATE: August 16, 2022 New X Amends Rescinds Dated March 23, 2002 AUTHORITY: TOTAL PAGES: Chief Drew Tracy 8 01 Purpose: To establish guidelines that ensure the department’s enforcement procedures conform to federal law regulating diplomatic immunity. 02 Policy: It is departmental policy to support the principles of international law and to extend privileges and immunity, when warranted, to members of foreign diplomatic missions and consular posts. However, the department also recognizes that most such privileges and immunity are not absolute and, therefore, will assure the appropriate degree of immunity is afforded once the immunity claimant has been precisely identified. The department will further maintain its fundamental responsibility to protect the public welfare in connection with criminal law enforcement actions involving foreign diplomatic personnel. Foreign diplomats who violate traffic laws shall be cited. Allegations of serious crime or other serious difficulties with diplomatic or consular personnel will be fully investigated, promptly reported to the U.S. Department of State, and procedurally developed to the maximum permissible extent. 03 Background: Departmental policy and procedures relative to diplomatic immunity is drawn from publication 9533, “Guidance for Law Enforcement Officers,” issued by the United States Department of State (USDS). Dealing with diplomatic immunity poses particular problems for law enforcement officers, and officers may react improperly if they do not understand its purposes or rules. Diplomatic immunity is a well-established doctrine of international law. In general, diplomats, their families, and their staff enjoy complete immunity from the criminal laws of the host nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Classifications and Career Development in the German Foreign Service I. Framework the German Federal Government Has Exclusive Le
    SIGMA Support for Improvement in Governance and Management A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Classifications and Career Development in the German Foreign Service I. Framework The German Federal Government has exclusive legislative authority in foreign affairs (Art. 73 no. 1 of the German Basic Law). The Foreign Service consists of the Foreign Office (headquarters) and the foreign missions, which together constitute one unitary, federal supreme authority (oberste Bundesbehörde). The tasks and organisation, as well as the legal status of members of the Foreign Service, are set down in the Foreign Service Act (FSA) of 30 August 1990 [Federal Law Gazette I 2002, p.1842], as amended by the First Act Amending the Foreign Service Act of 20 June 2002 [Federal Law Gazette I 2002, p. 2001 (attached)]. The Foreign Office headquarters steers the work of the foreign missions, assesses their reports and analyses, and on this basis draws up foreign policy blueprints for government policy. Headquarters also co-ordinates the foreign policy activities of other ministries and the federal states (Bundesländer) to ensure a uniform approach to German foreign policy and security policy. The Foreign Office consists of 11 departments and four regional political directorates, which in turn comprise divisions focusing on specific policy areas or geographical regions. Their analyses serve to prepare decisions at management level. The directorates-general and political directorates are: - Central Services: personnel
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing Strategic Stability in the Euro-Atlantic Region 2021 and Beyond
    June 2021 STATEMENT BY THE EURO-ATLANTIC SECURITY LEADERSHIP GROUP (EASLG) Prepared for Presidents, Prime Ministers, Parliamentarians, and Publics Advancing Strategic Stability in the Euro-Atlantic Region 2021 and Beyond n one of the best accounts of the lead-up to World War I, the historian Christopher Clark details how a group of European leaders—“The Sleepwalkers”—led their nations into a conflict that none of them wanted. Gripped by nationalism and ensnared by competing interests, mutual mistrust, and Ialliances, they made a series of tragic miscalculations that resulted in 40 million casualties. One of the more sobering aspects of this period was the speed with which events transpired in the summer of 1914, following the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife, Sophie, in Sarajevo on June 28. The subsequent ultimatums, mobilizations, declarations of war, and finally, war itself unfolded in roughly one month. Leaders of that era found themselves with precious little time for considering their decisions—and the world paid a horrific price. In the Euro-Atlantic region today, leaders face risks of deployments that should cause leaders to reflect on the miscalculation, compounded by the potential for the use of adequacy of the decision time available to them to prevent nuclear weapons, where millions could be killed in minutes. or deescalate a crisis. Emerging technologies such as evasive Do we have the tools to prevent an incident from turning hypersonic missiles or robotic nuclear torpedoes could into unimaginable catastrophe? significantly compress decision-time. When combined with artificial intelligence including machine learning, humans While leaders, governments and publics are strained by may be removed from being “in” or “on” the decision- the developing and constantly changing challenge of the making loop, especially when responding to a perceived or COVID-19 pandemic, there is a growing risk of—and a real attack.
    [Show full text]
  • Dean of the Diplomatic Corps
    Dean of the Diplomatic Corps Dean of the Honorary Consular Corps Excellencies, Members of the Diplomatic Corps Members of the Honorary Consular Corps Special Guests Ladies and Gentlemen Friends, Good Afternoon, A small rudder on a huge ship in the hands of a skilled captain sets a course in the face of the strongest winds. 1. This is the aspiration of the pragmatic Foreign Policy of The Bahamas, and the lessons from the opportunities of interaction in the global arena despite its many challenges. These challenges include, not least, the economic and financial crises with which a majority of States continues to grapple, including The Bahamas, and, the “hot spots” and “hot issues” from which no State is ultimately immune in an interdependent world. This is, therefore, the backdrop of this year for my reflections with you, on the focus, conduct and promulgation of the Foreign Policy of The Bahamas for 2011. I shall also this time attempt to be a bit ambitious and reveal some hopes for the future. Excellencies, Honorary Consuls, Ladies and Gentlemen, Diplomatic and Consular Representation 2 I shall begin, however, with an update on an overview of The Bahamas Diplomatic and Consular Representation. We bid farewell to various members of the resident Diplomatic Corps, namely Ambassadors Guggenheim of Brazil, HU of China, Ponce of Cuba, and, Avant of the United States. We have had the pleasure of welcoming to the Diplomatic Community, Resident Ambassadors Veras, HU and Guzman of Brazil, China and Cuba, respectively. We look forward to the continuation of our productive relationship and the advancement of our mutual interests with these most recent, and with you all.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Copenhagen FACULTY of SOCIAL SCIENCES Faculty of Social Sciences UNIVERSITY of COPENHAGEN · DENMARK PHD DISSERTATION 2019 · ISBN 978-87-7209-312-3
    Arctic identity interactions Reconfiguring dependency in Greenland’s and Denmark’s foreign policies Jacobsen, Marc Publication date: 2019 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (APA): Jacobsen, M. (2019). Arctic identity interactions: Reconfiguring dependency in Greenland’s and Denmark’s foreign policies. Download date: 11. okt.. 2021 DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE university of copenhagen FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES faculty of social sciences UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN · DENMARK PHD DISSERTATION 2019 · ISBN 978-87-7209-312-3 MARC JACOBSEN Arctic identity interactions Reconfiguring dependency in Greenland’s and Denmark’s foreign policies Reconfiguring dependency in Greenland’s and Denmark’s foreign policies and Denmark’s Reconfiguring dependency in Greenland’s identity interactions Arctic Arctic identity interactions Reconfiguring dependency in Greenland’s and Denmark’s foreign policies PhD Dissertation 2019 Marc Jacobsen DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE university of copenhagen FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES faculty of social sciences UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN · DENMARK PHD DISSERTATION 2019 · ISBN 978-87-7209-312-3 MARC JACOBSEN Arctic identity interactions Reconfiguring dependency in Greenland’s and Denmark’s foreign policies Reconfiguring dependency in Greenland’s and Denmark’s foreign policies and Denmark’s Reconfiguring dependency in Greenland’s identity interactions Arctic Arctic identity interactions Reconfiguring dependency in Greenland’s and Denmark’s foreign policies PhD Dissertation 2019 Marc Jacobsen Arctic identity interactions Reconfiguring dependency in Greenland’s and Denmark’s foreign policies Marc Jacobsen PhD Dissertation Department of Political Science University of Copenhagen September 2019 Main supervisor: Professor Ole Wæver, University of Copenhagen. Co-supervisor: Associate Professor Ulrik Pram Gad, Aalborg University.
    [Show full text]
  • Baggage Details One Bag. One Item. No Charge
    BAGGAGE DETAILS ONE BAG. ONE ITEM. NO CHARGE. We know, you’ve probably heard it before, but just in case you need a reminder: you’re only allowed one carry-on bag and one personal item onboard at no charge. Just make sure they fit into the overhead bin or under the seat in front of you. Cram sessions are not pretty — and they slow things down. SO WHAT EXACTLY IS ALLOWED? Approved Personal Items • 1 purse, briefcase, camera bag or diaper bag • or 1 laptop computer (computers cannot be checked) • or 1 item of a similar or smaller size to those listed above Additional Approved Items The following items do not count as personal items (they’re freebies): • A jacket and/or umbrella • Food or drink purchased after clearing the security checkpoint • Duty-free merchandise • Special itemsopens in a new window like strollers, child restraint seats or assistive devices such as wheelchairs or crutches CARRY-ON SIZE RESTRICTIONS It won’t fit. Three words you don’t want to hear when trying to board. To avoid delays and possible checked bag fees, follow these size requirements: • Baggage may not exceed 45 linear inches (or 114 cm) in combined length, width and height, including any handles and wheels, with the exception of small musical instruments that fit in the overhead compartment space or under-seat space available at the time of boarding • Baggage must meet carry on size limits (approximately 22" x 14" x 9" or 56 x 35 x 23 cm). Reference size check templates located at ticket counters and gates.
    [Show full text]
  • DIPLOMATIC and CONSULAR LAW Right of Legation
    DIPLOMATIC AND CONSULAR LAW Right of legation/ Right of Diplomatic Intercourse It is the right of the state to send and receive diplomatic missions, which enables states to carry on friendly intercourse. It is governed by the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961). The exercise of this right is one of the most effective ways of facilitating and promoting intercourse among nations. Through the active right of sending diplomatic representatives and the passive right of receiving them, States are able to deal more directly and closely with each other in the improvement of their mutual intercourse. NOTE: As the right of legation is purely consensual, the State is not obliged to maintain diplomatic relations with other States. If it wants to, a State may shut itself from the rest of the world, as Japan did until the close of the 19th century. Disadvantage: A policy of isolation would hinder the progress of a State since it would be denying itself of the many benefits available from the international community. Agents of diplomatic intercourse 1. Head of State 2. Foreign secretary or minister 3. Members of diplomatic service 4. Special diplomatic agents appointed by head of the State 5. Envoys ceremonial Diplomatic corps It is a body consisting of the different diplomatic representatives who have been accredited to the same local or receiving State. It is headed by a doyun de corps, who, by tradition, is the oldest member within the highest rank or, in Catholic countries, the papal nuncio. Functions of a diplomatic mission (Re-P-Pro-N-A-R) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative Stay Memorandum
    Case 1:20-cv-01437-CKK Document 33-1 Filed 07/20/20 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) MOHAMED SOLTAN, ) ) Civil Action No.: 20-cv-1437 (CKK) Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) ) HAZEM ABDEL AZIZ EL BEBLAWI, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF PROCEEDINGS FOR THE COURT TO ASSESS THE STATUS OF DEFENDANT BEBLAWI’S CLAIM OF DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY Eric L. Lewis (D.C. Bar #394643) Waleed Nassar (D.C. Bar #992659) Jeffrey D. Robinson (D.C. Bar #376037) Aisha E. Bembry (D.C. Bar #4889500) LEWIS BAACH KAUFMANN MIDDLEMISS PLLC 1101 New York Ave., N.W, Suite 1000 Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 833‐ 8900 (voice) (202) 466‐5738 (facsimile) Counsel for Plaintiff Mohamed Soltan Case 1:20-cv-01437-CKK Document 33-1 Filed 07/20/20 Page 2 of 18 TABLE OF AUTHORIES Agreement between the United States of America and the United Nations regarding the Headquarters of the United Nations, Art. V, Section 15, November 21, 1947, 61 Stat. 3416 https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%2011/volume-11-I-147-English.pdf. ..........................................................................................................................................................7 Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund, Art. IX, Section. 8, July 22, 1944, 60 Stat. 1401, https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/aa/index.htm ..........................1 IMF Executive Directors and Voting Power, https://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/memdir/eds.aspx ...................................................................8 IMF Members’ Quotas and Voting Power, and IMF Board of Governors. https://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/memdir/members.aspx ..........................................................8 IMF Organization Chart, https://www.imf.org/external/np/obp/orgcht.htm ...................................8 Office of Foreign Missions, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Diplomatic List March 2020.Pdf
    BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS Department of Diplomatic Protocol DIPLOMATIC AND CONSULAR CORPS AND INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA March 2020 C O N T E N T S Order of Precedence among the Heads of Diplomatic Missions and Dates of Presentation of Credentials AMBASSADORS 8 Diplomatic Missions accredited to Bosnia and Herzegovina *Non-resident REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA* 13 PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF ALGERIA* 14 REPUBLIC OF ANGOLA* 16 REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA* 17 REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA* 18 COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA* 19 REPUBLIC OF AUSTRIA 20 REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN* 23 KINGDOM OF BAHRAIN* 24 PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH* 25 REPUBLIC OF BELARUS* 26 KINGDOM OF BELGIUM* 27 FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL 30 NEGARA BRUNEI DARUSSALAM* 32 REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 33 BURKINA FASO* 35 CANADA* 36 REPUBLIC OF CHILE* 39 PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA 40 REPUBLIC OF COSTA RICA* 42 REPUBLIC OF CROATIA 43 REPUBLIC OF CUBA* 46 REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS* 47 CZECH REPUBLIC 48 KINGDOM OF DENMARK* 50 REPUBLIC OF ECUADOR* 51 2 ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT 52 REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA* 53 FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA* 54 REPUBLIC OF FINLAND* 55 REPUBLIC OF FRANCE 56 GEORGIA* 60 FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY 62 REPUBLIC OF GHANA* 66 HELLENIC REPUBLIC (GREECE) 68 HOLY SEE 70 HUNGARY 71 REPUBLIC OF ICELAND* 74 REPUBLIC OF INDIA* 75 REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA 77 ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN 79 REPUBLIC OF IRAQ* 81 IRELAND* 82 STATE OF ISRAEL* 83 REPUBLIC OF ITALY 84 JAPAN 87 HASHEMITE KINGDOM OF JORDAN* 89 REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN* 90 DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC
    [Show full text]
  • HC-125-(S)-09: Domestic Employees Prenotification Secretariat
    UNITED STATES MISSION TO THE UNITED NATIONS NEW YORK October 23, 2009 HC-125(S)-09 The United States Mission to the United Nations presents its compliments to the United Nations Secretariat and has the honor to refer to the standards applicable to the employment of personal workers, attendants, and any other domestic workers employed by United Nations officials who are in the United States in nonimmigrant G-5 visa status. The United States Mission wishes to emphasize the importance to the United States Government of providing fair treatment to domestic workers who come to the United States to work for members of the diplomatic community and to request that the United Nations Secretary-General take any and all measures necessary to ensure that the officials of the Organization employing such workers respect the laws relating to the treatment to be accorded domestic workers. This note supersedes previous notes on this subject. New Domestic Worker Visa Eligibility Requirements The United States Mission wishes to inform the United Nations Secretariat of two new requirements it is implementing in connection with the employment of domestic workers by United Nations officials that pertain to the visa eligibility of prospective domestic workers. The United States Mission currently requires that it be notified at the time of the arrival in and departure from the United States of all domestic workers. DIPLOMATIC NOTE -2- Effective November 15, 2009, the United States Mission will also require that it be provided with notification of any prospective domestic worker before the worker applies for a visa. This “pre-notification” requires that the Visa Committee of the United Nations Office of Human Resources Management submit a completed “Pre-Notification of a Domestic Worker” form (“Pre-Notification Form”) addressed to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • ENGLISH RESOLUTIONS English Compilation of IDI Resolutions: Preliminary Note
    ENGLISH RESOLUTIONS English compilation of IDI resolutions: preliminary note Please note the following: the Institute started publishing its resolutions in both French and English from 1957 onwards only. A comprehensive overview of these resolutions (1957 – 2017) can be found in this compilation under Part II. Nevertheless, to facilitate as much as possible your research, unofficial translations of earlier resolutions have been provided in Part I of this compilation. Part I is based on the book by J.B. Scott, Resolutions of the Institute of International Law dealing with the Law of Nations with an historical introduction and explanatory notes, NY: OUP, 1916. It covers resolutions adopted by the Institute between 1875 and 1913 dealing with public international law only. The historical introductions as set out in Scott’s book have been copied here for your convenience but please note that nearly all footnotes have been omitted (including, if any, from the resolutions). Furthermore, the text is mainly unedited. Therefore, use the text of Part I only as reference and make sure to verify its accuracy in light of the authentic French text. For this purpose, you can use the identification code as added to each of the titles of the English Resolutions in this compilation in order to find the corresponding resolution in the French compilation in the bookmarks list (which can be found when clicking on the following icon: ). PART I UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATIONS OF PUBLIC LAW RESOLUTIONS (1875 – 1913) BY J.B. SCOTT 1. ARBITRAL PROCEDURE (1875-Haye-01) At its Geneva meeting in 1874, the Institute had deliberated at length upon a draft of regulations for international courts of arbitration1 carefully prepared with a statement of reasons by Mr.
    [Show full text]