DOCSLIB.ORG

Ifaw-Trail-Of-Lies-Full-Report.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ifaw-Trail-Of-Lies-Full-Report.Pdf Trail of Lies Report on the role of trail hunting in preventing successful prosecutions against illegal hunters in the UK By Jordi Casamitjana Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................5 2. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................8 2.1. Hunting with dogs.................................................................................................................................8 2.1.1. A typical foxhunting day ............................................................................................................ 11 2.1.2. Cub hunting ............................................................................................................................... 16 2.1.3. Hunting roles ............................................................................................................................. 18 2.2. Drag hunting and bloodhounds hunting ........................................................................................... 22 2.3. The hunting ban ................................................................................................................................. 30 2.4. Enforcement of the hunting ban ....................................................................................................... 36 2.5. The NGOs’ role in the enforcement of the ban ................................................................................. 40 3. METHODS .................................................................................................................................................. 43 3.1. Bibliographical sources ...................................................................................................................... 43 3.2. Testimony of first-hand witnesses .................................................................................................... 43 3.3. Expert opinion ................................................................................................................................... 44 3.4. Hunt monitoring reports ................................................................................................................... 44 3.5. Documents ......................................................................................................................................... 49 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................................ 50 4.1. What is trail hunting? ........................................................................................................................ 50 4.1.1. What the hunts say trail hunting is ........................................................................................... 50 4.1.2. What others believe trail hunting is .......................................................................................... 56 4.1.2.1. Media and anti-hunting organisations .............................................................................. 57 4.1.2.2. National Trust .................................................................................................................... 66 4.1.2.3. The Government ................................................................................................................ 67 4.1.2.4. The Police and CPS ............................................................................................................. 68 4.1.2.5. Forestry Commission and Ministry of Defence ................................................................. 70 4.1.3. What does trail hunting look like .............................................................................................. 75 4.1.3.1. The scent ............................................................................................................................ 75 4.1.3.2. The terrain ......................................................................................................................... 79 4.1.3.3. The people ......................................................................................................................... 81 4.1.3.4. The hounds ........................................................................................................................ 86 4.1.3.5. The procedure ................................................................................................................... 87 4.2. Trail hunting used as an alibi in criminal investigations .................................................................... 91 2 4.3. Trail hunting as a false alibi for illegal hunting .................................................................................. 96 4.3.1. MO1 –Laying no trail ............................................................................................................... 101 4.3.2. MO2 –creating false evidence ................................................................................................. 103 4.3.3. MO3 –faking it ......................................................................................................................... 103 4.3.4. MO4 –causing accidents .......................................................................................................... 104 4.4. The criminality of trail hunters ........................................................................................................ 109 4.4.1. Motive ...................................................................................................................................... 109 4.4.1.1. Hunting Declaration ......................................................................................................... 109 4.4.1.2. Temporary ban ................................................................................................................ 116 4.4.1.3. Sabotaging enforcement ................................................................................................. 117 4.4.2. Means ...................................................................................................................................... 118 4.4.2.1. Hunt staff and supporters ............................................................................................... 118 4.4.2.2. Horses and dogs............................................................................................................... 119 4.4.2.3. Access to foxes and hares ................................................................................................ 121 4.4.2.4. Animal scent .................................................................................................................... 125 4.4.2.5. The pretence .................................................................................................................... 127 4.4.3. Opportunity ............................................................................................................................. 128 4.4.3.1. Lack of rules ..................................................................................................................... 128 4.4.3.2. Private land ...................................................................................................................... 129 4.4.3.3. The ‘antis’ credibility ....................................................................................................... 130 4.4.3.4. Enforcement Agencies ..................................................................................................... 131 4.4.3.5. Campaign fatigue ............................................................................................................. 133 4.4.4. Intent ....................................................................................................................................... 135 4.4.5. Hunting as organised crime ..................................................................................................... 137 4.4.5.1. Seriousness of the crime ................................................................................................. 137 4.4.5.2. Planning and coordination............................................................................................... 142 4.4.5.3. Continuity of the activity ................................................................................................. 149 4.4.5.4. Gang culture and corporate criminality .......................................................................... 150 4.5. Case studies ..................................................................................................................................... 154 4.5.1. MO1- Seavington Hunt prosecution ........................................................................................ 154 4.5.2. MO2- Cattistock Hunt case ...................................................................................................... 163 4.5.3. MO3 – X Foxhounds case study ............................................................................................... 174 4.5.4. MO4 – XX Foxhounds case study ............................................................................................. 180 4.6. Solutions .........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • English Legal System – an Overview
    1 English legal system – an overview Learning objectives By the end of this chapter you should: • appreciate the characteristics of law; • be able to identify sources of law and explain the different processes of law- making; • understand the various meanings of the term common law; • know in outline the structure, composition, and jurisdiction of the courts; • be able to explain the impact of membership of the European Union and the European Convention on Human Rights; and • have an overview of the bodies and personnel of the law. Introduction The study of the English legal system involves two different, but related processes. First, as a law student, you must learn a large body of factual material about the fundamental concepts of law, the sources of English law, and the institutions and the personnel of the law. You will encounter the material in this chapter during your study of the English legal system but you will fi nd that the material also underpins an understanding of other substantive modules, such as Contract, Tort, and Criminal law. This information contains the ‘basic tools’ that a law student needs to start to understand law and how it operates. Second, such knowledge is essential to the next process which involves a critical evaluation of the operation of law and its institutions; it is one thing to say what the law is, but quite another to explain if the law or an institution is operating effect- ively. A sound knowledge base is needed to found critical studies of the legal system or of the ‘law in action’.
    [Show full text]
  • Promote, Preserve, Protect
    Annual Hunt Roster Edition Fall 2020 The Magazine of Mounted Foxhunting Promote, Preserve, Protect Helping to Save Foxhunting for Future Generations Starting Point Farm Contents Standing irish Stallions for foxhunting & eventing 3 Letter from the President North America’s largerst breeder of Irish Draughts & Irish Sport Horses 4 MFHA Roster of Foxhound Packs 76 Index of Foxhound Packs by State 77 Membership Application 78 Index of Foxhound Masters 82 Professional Hunt Staff Index 84 Roster of Beagle, Basset and Harrier Packs *Cyan Night RID Dandelion Lord Tim Cover illustration by Tiffany Youngblood, Sweetgum Studio Officers and Directors *Macha Breeze RID OFFICERS DIRECTORS Term Expires Patrick Anthony Leahy, MFH President Canada • Dr. Charlotte McDonald, MFH .......................................... 2023 6267 E. Thoren Road, Elizabeth, IL 61028 Carolinas • Fred Berry, MFH .....................................................2021 Leslie Rhett Crosby, MFH Central • Arlene Taylor, MFH ....................................................2021 First Vice-President Great Plains • Dr. Luke Matranga, MFH 2022. 2022 Q-Course Sparrow’s Zeus Priscilla Rogers Denegre, MFH Maryland-Delaware • John McFadden, MFH .....................................2023 Second Vice-President Midsouth • Lilla Mason, MFH ...................................................2026 William Haggard, MFH SPF welcomes the foals of 2020! New England • Suzanne Levy, MFH .............................................2024 Secretary-Treasurer New York-New Jersey • David Feureisen,
    [Show full text]
  • Amending the Hunting Act 2004
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 6853, 13 July 2015 Amending the Hunting By Elena Ares Act 2004 Inside: 1. The Hunting Act 2. Proposals to amend the Act 3. Reactions to the proposals www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Number 6853, 13 July 2015 2 Contents Summary 3 1. The Hunting Act 4 1.1 The legislation in practice 4 England and Wales 4 Scotland 6 1.2 Public opinion on fox hunting 7 2. Proposals to amend the Act 7 2.1 Procedure to amend the Act 8 2.2 July 2015 announcement 8 2.3 Proposed amendments to Schedule 1 9 Passage through Parliament 9 3. Reactions to the proposals 11 Contributing Authors: Author, Subject, Section of document Cover page image copyright: Chamber-051 by UK Parliament image. Licensed under CC BY 2.0 / image cropped. 3 Amending the Hunting Act 2004 Summary Hunting with dogs was banned in England in 2004 under The Hunting Act. The legislation includes several exemptions which allow the use of a maximum of two dogs for certain hunting activities, including stalking and flushing. The exemptions under the Act can be amended using a statutory instrument with the approval of both Houses. The Conservative Government included a manifesto commitment to repeal the Hunting Act. However, in July 2015 the Government announced that it intended to amend the legislation to remove the limit on the number of dogs, and instead replace it with a requirement that the number of dogs used is appropriate to the terrain and any other relevant circumstance.
    [Show full text]
  • Pine Shadows Imprinting
    ® Today’s Breeder A Nestlé Purina Publication Dedicated to the Needs of Canine Enthusiasts Issue 73 BREEDER PROFILE Pine Shadows Kennel Sunup’s Kennels Warming Up Winter Learning the Ropes Rare Breeds at Purina Farms I especially enjoyed your article Edelweiss-registered dogs have “The Heyday of St. Louis Dog Shows” competed in conformation since the in Issue 72. The Saint Bernard pic- kennel began in 1894. tured winning Best in Show at the Thank you for bringing back mem- 1949 Mississippi Valley Kennel Club ories from our past. Dog Show is CH Gero-Oenz V. Edel - Kathy Knoles weiss, owned and han- Edelweiss Kennels dled by Frank Fleischli, Springfield, IL the second-generation Pro Club members Suzy and Chris owner of Edelweiss Ken - I loved reading about David Holleran feed their Bulldogs, nels. This dog won three Fitzpatrick and the Peke “Malachy” Michelle Gainsley poses her Pekingese, H.T. “Sassy,” above, and “Punkin’,” Bests in Show and the in Issue 72 of Today’s Breeder. I also Purina Pro Plan dog food. feed Purina Pro Plan to my Peke, H.T. Satin Doll, after going Best of Winners at the National Specialty before 2010 Pekingese Club of America National Satin Doll, or “Dolly.” In October, Thank you, Purina, for being blinded in a BB Specialty. “Dolly” also went Best of Opposite Sex. Dolly went Winners Bitch, Best of making Purina Pro Plan gun accident. Winners and Best of Opposite Sex I have been told by other exhibitors dog food. We are Walkin’ I am Frank’s grand- at the Pekingese National in New how wonderful Dolly’s coat is.
    [Show full text]
  • R V ADAMS, Appeal Against Conviction. Unreported, Cambridge Crown Court, 9 May 2019
    R v ADAMS, appeal against conviction. Unreported, Cambridge Crown Court, 9 May 2019. Hunting Act 2004; exempt hunting under Schedule 1; exemption under “flushing from cover for the purposes of falconry” Fox hunting has continued despite the Hunting Act 2004. There is a fairly small section of the population passionately in favour of hunting, with comparable section fiercely opposed to it, leaving a majority with a spectrum of views, perhaps tilting towards those who think it a distasteful activity, not worth reviving. Noticeably, Jeremy Hunt as a candidate for Conservative leadership this July, briefly favoured promising a further vote in Parliament, but soon backed off as he realised that it could cost him support within the Conservative party membership. Theresa May went into the 2017 election promising a further vote in the new parliament on whether to repeal the Hunting Act but in the event, so certain was its defeat, there was no attempt to introduce such a bill. Fox hunts have none the less continued to meet despite the restrictions of the Hunting Act 2004. They have had make adaptions. Some have organised “drag hunts” – that is following a scent laid by pulling a bag over the ground for the hounds to follow. Other fox hunts spotted an exemption in the Hunting Act. Under the Act hunting a wild mammal with dogs is unlawful unless it is one of the exempt activities set out in Schedule 1. Para 6 of Schedule 1 provides: Flushing a wild mammal from cover is exempt hunting if undertaken– (a) For the purpose of enabling a bird of prey to hunt the wild mammal, and (b) (Is on land the hunter owns or where he has permission to hunt) Fox hunts have therefore gone out with a golden eagle or similar bird of prey ready for release, and claimed that what was actually going on was a form of falconry.
    [Show full text]
  • 40 Dogs to Kill a Fox: Amending the Hunting Act 2004 Gregory Gordon
    40 dogs to kill a fox: Amending the Hunting Act 2004 Gregory Gordon, Guildhall Chambers If hunting is banned, I might as well leave the country and spend the rest of my life skiing.1 So said, it is reported, the heir to the throne. It must be frightening and confusing to find yourself on the wrong side of history just as the tides of social acceptability change against you. Opponents of the Hunting Act 2004 assured us it would destroy rural livelihoods, lead to the destruction of thousands of bloodhounds and overrun the countryside with foxes. Now that none of the above has come to pass, and public opinion remains firmly in favour of the Act, you would be forgiven for expecting that those who enjoy watching a pack of dogs tear a fox apart had nowhere left to turn. Not so. Free Vote As early as next Wednesday [15 July 2015] the Government plans to allow a free vote in the Commons to relax the law on hunting mammals with dogs. The Conservatives are not yet fulfilling their manifesto pledge to allow a vote on the full repeal of the Act, but may not need to if their deceptively dry proposed amendments are passed: the tortuously named Hunting Act (Exempt Hunting) (Amendment) Order 2015. Currently, only two dogs are permitted to “flush” a fox (who has, for fear of its life, taken cover underground) to the surface where the barrel of a gun awaits. The amendments would permit 40 hounds to do the job. Why? Are some burrows so cavernous that only 40 dogs could find a fox hidden therein? No.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 2 of the Parliament Act 1911
    SECTION 2 OF THE PARLIAMENT ACT 1911 This pamphlet is intended for members of the Office of the Parliamentary Counsel. References to Commons Standing Orders are to the Standing Orders of the House of Commons relating to Public Business of 1 May 2018 and the addenda up to 6 February 2019. References to Lords Standing Orders are to the Standing Orders of the House of Lords relating to Public Business of 18 May 2016. References to Erskine May are to Erskine May on Parliamentary Practice (25th edition, 2019). Office of the Parliamentary Counsel 11 July 2019 CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION General . 1 Text of section 2. 1 Uses of section 2 . 2 Role of First Parliamentary Counsel . 3 CHAPTER 2 APPLICATION OF SECTION 2 OF THE PARLIAMENT ACT 1911 Key requirements . 4 Bills to which section 2(1) applies . 4 Sending up to Lords in first Session . 6 Rejection by Lords in first Session . 7 Same Bill in second Session. 7 Passing Commons in second Session . 10 Sending up to Lords in second Session . 11 Rejection by Lords in second Session . 11 Commons directions . 14 Royal Assent . 14 CHAPTER 3 SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS Commons timing and procedure . 16 Function of the procedure . 17 Form of suggested amendment . 19 Lords duty to consider. 19 Procedure in Lords . 19 CHAPTER 4 OTHER PROCEDURAL ISSUES IN THE SECOND SESSION Procedure motions in Commons . 21 Money Resolutions . 23 Queen’s and Prince’s Consent . 23 To and Fro (or “ping-pong”) . 23 APPENDIX Jackson case: implied restrictions under section 2(1) . 25 —i— CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION General 1.1 The Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949 were passed to restrict the power of veto of the House of Lords over legislation.1 1.2 Section 1 of the 1911 Act is about securing Royal Assent to Money Bills to which the Lords have not consented.
    [Show full text]
  • John F. Robins, Secretary, Animal Concern Advice Line (ACAL), C/O Animal Concern, Post Office Box 5178, Dumbarton G82 5YJ
    E-MAIL FROM: John F. Robins, Secretary, Animal Concern Advice Line (ACAL), c/o Animal Concern, Post Office Box 5178, Dumbarton G82 5YJ. Tel 01389-841111. Mobile: 07721-605521. Animal Concern Advice Line (ACAL) is a recognised Scottish charity: No. SC030982. Animal Concern Advice Line was established in 2001 to take on the charitable work of Animal Concern which was founded as the Scottish Anti-Vivisection Society in 1876. E-MAIL: [email protected] Website: http://adviceaboutanimals.info To all ACAL Supporters, Hi, I hope that subject line got your attention. If you are on the e-mail lists of a few organisations you will have been inundated with requests to write to your MP and sign petitions calling on them to make a point of attending Parliament this coming Wednesday, July 15th, to vote against proposed amendments to the Hunting Act 2004. My e-mail to Scottish MPs (copied below) will explain why this is such a vitally important issue. If you live in England or Wales and have not written to your MP about this in the last two days please do so now telling them that you would like them to represent you in Parliament on Wednesday by voting against any and all proposed amendments to the Hunting Act 2004. If you live in Scotland and even if you have already written to your MP I’d like you to write again. All it needs is a short message saying something along the lines of: “I am a supporter of Animal Concern Advice Line (ACAL).
    [Show full text]
  • General Licence 008-Licence to Take Mallard Duck Eggs-Rear and Release
    Licence No: GEN / WCA / 008 / 2015 Valid From: 1st January 2015 st Expiry: 31 December 2015 WILDLIFE AND COUNTRYSIDE ACT 1981 (AS AMENDED) LICENCE TO TAKE EGGS OF MALLARD DUCK ( ANAS PLATYRHYNCHOS ) TO REAR AND RELEASE This licence, granted under Section 16(1) (c), 16(5) and Section 16(5)(a) of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended), by the Natural Resource Body for Wales otherwise known as Natural Resources Wales (NRW), being satisfied that as regards the purpose set out at paragraph 1 that there is no other satisfactory solution, permits authorised persons to carry out a range of activities against the birds of the species listed and hereby grants the following licence which applies only in Wales: - 1. This licence allows the taking of eggs of the Mallard duck for incubation before 31 March, to assist in the successful rearing of birds which otherwise would have been unlikely to withstand adverse weather conditions for the purpose of conserving wild birds. 2. Subject to the terms and conditions below this licence permits: any authorised person (see definitions) to take eggs of the Mallard Duck (Anas platyrhynchos) and for any such person to have in his possession such an egg and any bird hatched from such an egg. The works noted above are licensed for the period as stated above and are granted subject to compliance with the conditions as specified. Anything done otherwise than in accordance with the terms of the licence may constitute an offence. Signed for and on behalf of Natural Resources Wales Ffôn/Tel 0300 065 4974 / 0300 065 4921 Ebost/Email: [email protected] or [email protected] www.cyfoethnaturiolcymru.gov.uk www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru / Natural Resources Wales, Maes y Ffynnon, Penrhos Garnedd, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2DW Croesewir gohebiaeth yn y Gymraeg a'r Saesneg Correspondence welcomed in Welsh and English Licence Number : GEN / WCA / 008 / 2015 CONDITIONS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliament Sovereignty - Background
    1Parliament Sovereignty - Background ‘Glorious Revolution’ of 1689 - The legislative must needs be the supreme, and all other powers in any members or parts of the society, derived from and subordinate to it.” (John Locke) Definition Dicey on Sovereignty The principle of Parliamentary sovereignty means neither more nor less than this, namely, that Parliament … has, under the English constitution, the right to make or unmake any law whatever; and, further, that no person or body is recognised by the law of England as having a right to set aside the legislation of Parliament” Three key elements: 1. Parliament’s legislative competence. 2. Validity of an Act of Parliament cannot be challenged. 3. Parliament cannot limit future parliaments. 1. Legislative competency Parliament has unlimited legislative competence – omnicompetence – can make any kind of law. “It is often said that it would be unconstitutional for the United Kingdom Parliament to do certain things, meaning that the moral, political and other reasons against doing them are so strong that most people would regard it as highly improper if Parliament did these things. But that does not mean that it is beyond the power of Parliament to do such things. If Parliament chose to do any of them the Courts could not hold the Act of Parliament invalid” Madzimbamuto v Lardner-Burke [1968] AC 1062. ▪ Jennings – ‘If [the UK Parliament] enacts that smoking on the streets of Paris is an offence, then it is an offence’. But: AXA v Lord Advocate (2011) UKSC 46 – Supreme Court suggested there may be limits to the doctrine and where an Act of Parliament goes beyond the pale, the Court may be prepared to intervene.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2017 £3.00 / Volume 9 771476 824001 GUNDOG & ANGLING SPECIAL EDITION Fairs E O M F A
    ON SALE TO 12th MAY 2017 Irish COUNTRY SPORTS and COUNTRY LIFE 5.00 € 05 Volume 16 Number 1 Spring 2017 £3.00 / Volume 9 771476 824001 GUNDOG & ANGLING SPECIAL EDITION Fairs e o m f a I r G e l t a greatgamefairs a n e d r G ofireland Irish Game Fair and Fine Food Festival (inc the NI Angling Show) Ireland’s largest Game Fair and international countrysports event featuring action packed family entertainment in three arenas; a Living History Festival including medieval jousting; a Fine Food Festival; a Bygones Area, a huge tented village of trade stands and the top Irish and international countrysports competitions and displays. Shanes Castle, Antrim 24th & 25th June 2017 www.irishgamefair.com Irish Game & Country Fair and Fine Food Festival Main Arena sponsored by the NARGC The ROI’s national Game Fair featuring action packed family entertainment in two arenas; a Living History Village including medieval jousting; a Fine Food Festival; a huge tented village of trade stands and top Irish and International countrysports competitions and displays PLUS all the attractions of the beautiful world famous Birr Castle Demesne. Birr Castle, Co Offaly 26th & 27th August 2017 www.irishgameandcountryfair.com Supported by Irish Countrysports and Country Life magazine (inc The Irish Game Angler) Available as a hard copy glossy quarterly or FREE to READ online at www.countrysportsandcountrylife.com For further details contact: Great Game Fairs of Ireland: Tel: 028 (from ROI 048) 44839167 /44615416 Email: [email protected] Irish COUNTRY SPORTS
    [Show full text]
  • Fox Hunting Algorithm (FHA)
    International Conference on Applied Mathematics, Simulation and Modelling (AMSM 2016) A New and Fast Optimization Algorithm: Fox Hunting Algorithm (FHA) Murat Onay Erciyes University, Faculty of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Turkey Abstract—A new population-based search algorithm called the Optimization algorithms usually have two search Fox Hunting Algorithm (FHA) is presented here. FHA is a mechanisms. The first one is a global search mechanism and general-purpose algorithm that can be applied to solve almost the second one is a local search mechanism. By the experience any optimization problem. The algorithm mimics the fox hunting researchers knows that the local search mechanism must be activity which is formed and improved since 16th century. The modified while searching approaches to the solution. Because algorithm performs some neighborhood searches combined with of that two search mechanisms are not efficient for real world random search. It can be used for both combinatorial problems. So in this optimization algorithm there are three optimization and functional optimization. search mechanisms for searching in a more efficient way. The first one is a global search mechanism; second one is a local Keywords-component; fox hunting algorithm, functional optimization, swarm intelligence search mechanism; third one is the deeper local search mechanism. They are similar to the fox hunting activity. The first search with horses is like global search in the I. INTRODUCTION optimization process; it is fast and searches bigger areas with Classical methods often face great difficulties in solving biggest steps in the whole search mechanism. The second one many complex multi-variable Optimization problems that with trained foxhounds is like local search; it is slower than abound in the real world.
    [Show full text]