Water in Figures 2020

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Water in Figures 2020 WATER IN FIGURES 2020 BENCHMARKING & STATISTICS Denmark XXXEDITORIAL TEXT: CARL-EMIL LARSEN/ PHOTO: DANVA The water sector as energy and climate neutral he climate action plan for the water water sector. The water companies are part of by an average household for drinking water and sector emphasises the message that the green transition through the innovation of wastewater has remained very stable over the T Danish water technology can help resource efficient, digital and holistic solutions. last 10 years. In 2019, an average family with find solutions to global climate challenges. These focus on greater efficiencies, energy average consumption paid € 757 for drinking The ambition of the political parties behind optimisation, reduction of greenhouse gases water and wastewater, representing a decrease the agreement is for the water companies in and the production of green and sustainable of 2% compared with 2018. Although the price Denmark to be energy and climate-neutral. The energy. Equally, DANVA's members are seeking of water rose on average by 2.6% to € 9.55/ key figures for the water sector show that the to become climate-neutral and thereby help m3, this increase was offset by a drop in water water companies are already well on the way meet the ambitious objectives set for Denmark. consumption, which achieved its lowest level to achieving this. The water companies are also ambitious so far of 101 litres per person per day. The Danish Parliament has resolved that concerning the requirements set by society for DANVA's benchmarking shows that the Denmark should reduce its CO2 emissions managing wastewater discharges. The summer water companies act in an optimal manner and by 70 percent by the year 2030. The main of 2020 has seen a debate on overflows and exactly in line with the wishes of the politicians greenhouse gas emissions from the wastewa- discharges and, although the sector is only at Christiansborg. It therefore makes a lot of ter sector derive from nitrous oxide in the responsible for 10 percent of the average nitro- sense to lower the bureaucratic burden on the treatment process. Nitrous oxide is 298 times gen outlet into aquatic environments (whereas water sector, which devotes a lot of resources more harmful to the ozone layer than CO2. agriculture is responsible for 60–70 percent), it to unnecessary administration and documen- DANVA's members are already well ad- is nevertheless critical that the situation meets tation. If the tariffs are reasonable, the targets vanced in the process, and DANVA's new strat- the requirements of a modern society. If better met, and water customers satisfied, politicians egy for 2020–2024, adopted by the annual treatment of wastewater is what is desired, the should work to create a less zealous, resource general meeting in May, is a stepping stone on politicians must make the necessary demands. consuming bureaucratic system, which, after the way towards a climate and energy-neutral Measured in fixed prices, the amount paid all, only results in higher costs and higher water prices. The key figures also show that Danes have DANVA and DANVA Benchmarking access to tap water practically 24 hours a day, 365 days of the year. In 2019, average availa- DANVA, the Danish Water and Wastewater Association, is an industry organi- bility was in excess of 99.99 percent. Danes, sation for drinking water companies and wastewater companies in Denmark. on average, were without access to water for DANVA is a non-profit association, funded by its members and through income only 40 minutes out of the 525,600 minutes generating activities. DANVA has been offering benchmarking to its members for almost 20 years. of the year. Benchmarking is a tool to provide an overview of the company's performance Denmark has one of the lowest levels of wa- and to identify DANVA and DANVA Benchmarking areas where efficiency can be ter losses in the water destribution systems in improved. The reporting to DANVA Benchmarking and Statistics forms the basis the world and, apart from a slight increase in for the preparation of this publication. In total, 162 drinking water and waste- 2018, due to the very dry summer, water loss is water companies have participated in the reporting to "Water in Figures 2020", with data from 2019. The participating drinking water companies collectively again right down. In 2019, it was down to 7.29%. supply water to around 60% of the Danish population. Collectively, the partici- Water companies are among society's most pating wastewater companies handle and treat water from around 80% of the important actors and, with their targeted, effi- Danish population. cient management, fully meet the expectations of customers, authorities and regulators. 2 WATER IN FIGURES 2020 Half a litre of drinking WATER PRICE water from the tap How much does costs less than water cost? Why are there "How much does water cost?" and "Why does 0.48 differences in the water cost what it does?". These are two good cent questions which DANVA is often asked and water price? they are not that easy to answer. The price How much does water cost? of water is not the same throughout the country. On the one hand, there are The price of water depends on which wa- structural differences, such as geological conditions, different customer bases ter company you use. There are more than and large differences in investment needs, and on the other hand, the compo- 2,500 water utilities and 98 wastewater sition of the price may vary from company to company. utilities in Denmark. Contact your local water Legislation states that the companies are permitted to charge a fixed annual company to get your water prices. The water price consists of a total of five administrational fee and must charge a variable fee per m3 of water consump- elements: 3 tion. The pricing scheme therefore has a major bearing on the cost of one m • Fixed charge for drinking water (if any) of water consumed. Some companies charge a fixed annual base charge on • Cubic metre price for drinking water water and/or wastewater, while others only charge for the amount of water • Fixed charge for wastewater (if any) consumed, and this results in considerable variation when the price for one • Cubic metre price for wastewater • VAT and other fees m3 of water consumed is calculated. The fixed, annual base contribution is paid per household (and not for example per person). A set consumption Why does the price of water vary? amount must therefore be assumed in order to be able to state the cost of one There is quite a gap between the lowest and m3 of water consumed. This is why we calculate that average price, is which highest prices among the water companies. an average household would pay based on average consumption. In this way, In general, the difference in total prices can be attributed to several factors: we can compare the price across companies regardless of the pricing scheme • It can be relatively less expensive to supply each company uses. water to water consuming industries than The average price for water in Denmark in 2019 was € 9.55 per m3, based small customers, such as holiday homes. on an average household size of 2.15 people with an average household water • Geological conditions can make it more consumption of 101 litres per person per day. For a single person, the average expensive to collect water from below the ground. price of one cubic meter of water is slightly higher, namely € 10.67 per m3 at a • In some places, groundwater pollution 3 consumption of 50 m , since the fixed charge increases the average price more and scarcity of water resources may mean at low consumption. The average price per m3 for a family with three children investing in new groundwater abstraction is somewhat lower, namely € 8.52 per m3, based on an annual consumption areas for water extraction. of 170 m3. The average water price has increased by 2.68% compared with the • Some drinking water companies spend more than others on groundwater protec- previous year's price of € 9.30/m3. The increase for the year was attributed to tion. Other companies are "born lucky”, as a number of issues, including the decrease in water consumption, which, due their water abstraction areas are already in to the fixed charge, results in an average increase in the m3 price. protected nature areas. The price of drinking water covers the cost of groundwater protection, ab- • The treatment requirements for wastewater straction, processing and distribution of drinking water from the waterworks depend, in particular, on the natural setting of the point of discharge for the treated wa- to customers. The cost of wastewater covers the operation and maintenance, ter. Requirements are often higher for dis- renovation and extension of the sewer network, climate protection, operation charge to vulnerable recipients in freshwater and maintenance of treatment plants, as well as checks to ensure compliance areas than for discharge into the sea. with discharge requirements before being discharged to the recipient. • Decentralised wastewater treatment in smaller plants is usually more expensive than central wastewater treatment at AVERAGE PRICE OF WATER BASED ON CONSUMPTION, 2019 larger ones. 3 €/M€/m³ • Environmental conditions requiring addi- tional measures. Single-person • There is a significant difference in the level households 10.67 (50 m³/yr) €/m³ of investment from company to company. Currently, many companies are investing in new climate change adaptation meas- Avg. Family ures in order to respond to the increase in (2,15 persons) 9.55 (79.29 m³/yr) €/m³ rain volumes.
Recommended publications
  • The Frederikssund Route (2018)
    Municipality of Frederikssund Municipality of Egedal The Frederikssund 6 km of C97 14.3 km of C97 31% are physically inactive* 32% are physically inactive* Route C97 30% have less than 10 km to work 24% have less than 10 km to work 27% of households do not have a car 22% of households do not have a car Length: 43 km Municipalities: Frederikssund, Egedal, Ballerup, Herlev and Copenhagen Municipality of Herlev Launched: 2017 3 km of C97 Frederikssund LATEST RESULTS 31% are physically inactive* 59% have less than 10 km to work 41% of households do not have a car 15% increase in 150 the number of cyclists (2010-2018) 12% of the new cyclists 150 used to travel by car Egedal The average bike trip length 50 on the route is 12.7 km 200 Herlev 1300 On a daily basis the number of 2300 km cycled km are 42,000 km Ballerup 3450 4700 Copenhagen Highest number of cyclists: Municipality of Ballerup 4,700 cyclists on a weekday 10 km of C97 35 fewer sickdays on a daily basis 29% are physically inactive* due to increased health from cycling 45% have less than 10 km to work 40% of households do not have a car Municipality of Copenhagen COMMUTER FEEDBACK 9.4 km of C97 67% find that the route lives up • Proposals for improvements*: 22% are physically inactive* to their expectations to a cycle • New asphalt, especially in Copenhagen. 71% have less than 10 km to work superhighway. • Better signage through Egedal. 71% of households do not have a car 76% are satisfied with the per- • Optimising green time at traffic lights through ceived safety for the route.
    [Show full text]
  • ESCO-Contracting in Danish Municipalities
    Energies 2013, 6, 2407-2427; doi:10.3390/en6052407 OPEN ACCESS energies ISSN 1996-1073 www.mdpi.com/journal/energies Article Greening Public Buildings: ESCO-Contracting in Danish Municipalities Jesper Ole Jensen 1,*, Susanne Balslev Nielsen 2 and Jesper Rohr Hansen 1 1 Department of Town, Housing and Property, Danish Building Research Institute, A.C.Meyers Vænge 15, Copenhagen DK-2450, Denmark; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Bygning 424, Kongens Lyngby DK-2800, Denmark; E-Mail: [email protected] (S.B.N.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +45-9940-2358. Received: 27 February 2013; in revised form: 11 April 2013 / Accepted: 24 April 2013 / Published: 6 May 2013 Abstract: This paper presents current research on Danish municipalities’ use of Energy Service Companies (ESCO) as a way to improve the standard of public buildings and to increase energy efficiency. In recent years more and more municipalities have used ESCO-contracts to retrofit existing public buildings, and to make them more energy efficient. At the moment 30 municipalities (of the 98 municipalities in Denmark) are involved in, or preparing, ESCO contracts. Nevertheless, ESCO-contracting still faces many challenges on the Danish market, as there is a widespread skepticism towards the concept amongst many stakeholders. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the various experience gained so far by municipalities use of ESCO-contracting, the different approached to ESCO-contracting being used in practice, as well as the different viewpoints drivers and barriers behind the development.
    [Show full text]
  • Oversigt Over Danhostels 2019
    OVERSIGT OVER DANHOSTELS 2019 Danhostel Blåvandshuk - [email protected] Danhostel Hillerød - [email protected] Danhostel Rømø - [email protected] 22 43 1 Strandvejen 1, 6840 Oksbøl - (+45) 75 27 11 10 Lejrskolevej 4, 3400 Hillerød - (+45) 48 26 19 86 Lyngvejen 7, 6792 Rømø - (+45) 74 75 51 88 Danhostel Rønde - [email protected] Danhostel Brande - [email protected] 23 Danhostel Hobro - [email protected] 44 2 Dr. Arendsvej 2, 7330 Brande - (+45) 97 18 21 97 Amerikavej 24, 9500 Hobro - (+45) 98 52 18 47 Grenåvej 10 B, 8410 Rønde - (+45) 40 40 18 11 Danhostel Sakskøbing - [email protected] Danhostel Copenhagen Amager - [email protected] 24 Danhostel Horsens - [email protected] 45 3 Vejlands Allé 200, 2300 København S - (+45) 32 52 29 08 Flintebakken 150, 8700 Horsens - (+45) 75 61 67 77 Saxes Allé 10, 4990 Sakskøbing - (+45) 54 70 45 66 Danhostel Sandvig - [email protected] Danhostel Copenhagn Bellahøj - [email protected] 25 Danhostel Hvide Sande - [email protected] 46 4 Herbergvejen 8, 2700 Brønshøj - (+45) 38 28 97 15 Numitvej 5, 6960 Hvide Sande - (+45) 97 31 21 05 Langebjergvej 12, 3770 Allinge - (+45) 56 48 09 80 Danhostel Copenhagen City - [email protected] 26 Danhostel Ishøj-Strand - [email protected] 47 Danhostel Silkeborg - [email protected] 5 H.C. Andersens Boul. 50, 1553 København V - (+45) 33 11 85 85 Ishøj Strandvej 13, 2635 Ishøj - (+45) 43 53 50 15 Åhavevej 55, 8600 Silkeborg - (+45) 86 82 36 42 Danhostel Ebeltoft - [email protected] Danhostel Kalundborg - [email protected] Danhostel Skagen - [email protected] 6 27 48 Egedalsvej 5, 8400 Ebeltoft - (+45) 86 34 20 53 Stadion Alle 5, 4400 Kalundborg - (+45) 59 56 13 66 Rolighedsvej 2, 9990 Skagen - (+45) 98 44 22 00 Danhostel Esbjerg - [email protected] Danhostel Kerteminde - [email protected] Danhostel Skanderborg - [email protected] 7 28 49 Gl.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Smart Cities in Denmark
    GROWING SMART CITIES IN DENMARK DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY FOR URBAN IMPROVEMENT AND NATIONAL PROSPERITY RESEARCH AND EDITORIAL ABOUT TEAM About Invest in Denmark Léan Doody As part of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark, Invest Associate Director – Arup in Denmark is a customized one-stop service for foreign [email protected] companies looking to set up a business in Denmark. Nicola Walt www.investindk.com Principal Consultant – Arup [email protected] About Arup Ina Dimireva Consultant – Arup Arup is an independent consultancy providing professional [email protected] services in management, planning, design and engineering. As a global firm Arup draws on the skills and expertise of Anders Nørskov Director – CEDI nearly 11,000 consultants. Arup’s dedication to exploring [email protected] innovative strategies and looking beyond the constraints of individual specialisms allows the firm to deliver holistic, multi-disciplinary solutions for clients. STEERING COMMITTEE www.arup.com This research was commissioned by: About CEDI CEDI is a consulting company with expertise in public sector digitization in Denmark. CEDI provides strategic consulting Financing partners and steering committee: to the government and the IT industry based on solid insight into the subjects of digitization and technology, extensive knowledge on the administrative and decision-making pro- cesses of government agencies, and a deep understanding of the political agenda. www.cedi.dk Additional participants in the steering committee meetings were the Central Denmark Region, Local Government Den- mark (LGDK) and the municipalities of Aarhus and Vejle. Layout Mads Toft Jensen +45 25143599 [email protected] www.spokespeople.dk ©2016 Arup, CEDI.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Plan Content
    2020 Business plan Content Preface .................................................................................. 3 Business strategy ................................................................... 4 Framework for Aarhus Vand ................................................... 8 Cooperation with Aarhus Municipality ................................... 10 Annual wheel 2020 .............................................................. 12 The Board ............................................................................ 13 Purpose, vision and core story ............................................. 15 Strategic partnerships strengthen us ................................... 16 Integrating the UN’s global goals for sustainability ................ 20 Aarhus ReWater – a trailblazer in resource utilisation ............ 22 Implementing a digital transformation ................................... 24 New ways of working with water .......................................... 27 Creating a strong corporate culture together ........................ 28 Organisation ........................................................................ 30 Sharpened focus on financing .............................................. 32 Financial forecast for 2020 ................................................... 33 Investment and tariffs ........................................................... 34 Lars Schrøder, CEO Aarhus Vand 2 PREFACE Welcome to Aarhus Vand’s business plan Welcome to Aarhus Vand’s business plan. The 2020, we will therefore experiment
    [Show full text]
  • Oversigt Over Retskredsnumre
    Oversigt over retskredsnumre I forbindelse med retskredsreformen, der trådte i kraft den 1. januar 2007, ændredes retskredsenes numre. Retskredsnummeret er det samme som myndighedskoden på www.tinglysning.dk. De nye retskredsnumre er følgende: Retskreds nr. 1 – Retten i Hjørring Retskreds nr. 2 – Retten i Aalborg Retskreds nr. 3 – Retten i Randers Retskreds nr. 4 – Retten i Aarhus Retskreds nr. 5 – Retten i Viborg Retskreds nr. 6 – Retten i Holstebro Retskreds nr. 7 – Retten i Herning Retskreds nr. 8 – Retten i Horsens Retskreds nr. 9 – Retten i Kolding Retskreds nr. 10 – Retten i Esbjerg Retskreds nr. 11 – Retten i Sønderborg Retskreds nr. 12 – Retten i Odense Retskreds nr. 13 – Retten i Svendborg Retskreds nr. 14 – Retten i Nykøbing Falster Retskreds nr. 15 – Retten i Næstved Retskreds nr. 16 – Retten i Holbæk Retskreds nr. 17 – Retten i Roskilde Retskreds nr. 18 – Retten i Hillerød Retskreds nr. 19 – Retten i Helsingør Retskreds nr. 20 – Retten i Lyngby Retskreds nr. 21 – Retten i Glostrup Retskreds nr. 22 – Retten på Frederiksberg Retskreds nr. 23 – Københavns Byret Retskreds nr. 24 – Retten på Bornholm Indtil 1. januar 2007 havde retskredsene følende numre: Retskreds nr. 1 – Københavns Byret Retskreds nr. 2 – Retten på Frederiksberg Retskreds nr. 3 – Retten i Gentofte Retskreds nr. 4 – Retten i Lyngby Retskreds nr. 5 – Retten i Gladsaxe Retskreds nr. 6 – Retten i Ballerup Retskreds nr. 7 – Retten i Hvidovre Retskreds nr. 8 – Retten i Rødovre Retskreds nr. 9 – Retten i Glostrup Retskreds nr. 10 – Retten i Brøndbyerne Retskreds nr. 11 – Retten i Taastrup Retskreds nr. 12 – Retten i Tårnby Retskreds nr. 13 – Retten i Helsingør Retskreds nr.
    [Show full text]
  • Ring 3 Letbane VVM
    Ring 3 Letbane VVM Hvidbog fra forudgående høring September 2014 Ring 3 Letbane VVM Udgivet af: Transportministeriet Frederiksholms Kanal 27F 1220 København K Udarbejdet af: Transportministeriet ISBN: 978-87-91511-92-9 Ring 3 Letbane VVM Indhold 1. Indledning ..........................................................................................5 2. Sammenfattende vurdering ............................................................... 6 3. Beskrivelse af det fremlagte projekt ................................................... 7 4. Høringssvar ....................................................................................... 9 4.1. Linjeføring og stationer ........................................................... 9 4.1.1. Forslag til alternative linjeføringer og stationer ........... 10 4.1.2. Vige- og vendemuligheder ............................................ 14 4.1.3. Øvrige alternativer, hurtigbusser (BRT) og stier .......... 14 4.2. Trafikale forhold ..................................................................... 15 4.3. Støj og vibrationer .................................................................. 16 4.4. Visuelle forhold ....................................................................... 17 4.5. Håndtering af regnvand .......................................................... 17 4.6. Øvrige gener og påvirkninger ................................................. 18 4.6.1. Magnetfelter .................................................................. 18 4.6.2. Risiko for sætningsskader ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • WTG Foundations Kalundborg, Kolding, Aarhus and Aalborg in Denmark, Agement, Planning, Computer Applications, Information and Wellington in New Zealand
    The Company The Staff ISC Consulting Engineers A/S was founded in 1967 by The combined staff of the company comprises Kjeld Thomsen M.Sc. (Struct. Eng.), former associate 250 employees (year 2019/20) of which approximately professor at the Technical University of Denmark. 70 percent are graduates in civil and structural engineering, electrical or mechanical and related ISC offices are located in Copenhagen, Esbjerg, Viborg, disciplines. The company’s expertise also covers man- WTG Foundations Kalundborg, Kolding, Aarhus and Aalborg in Denmark, agement, planning, computer applications, information and Wellington in New Zealand. systems and maintenance systems. ISC provides comprehensive independent consulting Furthermore, ISC maintains standing agreements services within all fields of planning, feasibility studies, of cooperation with individual experts and public civil, structural, mechanical, process and electrical engi- scientific institutions, thereby supplementing the neering on a worldwide basis. company’s know-how in connection with assignments requiring multiprofessional teams of specialists ISC has exceptional experience and knowledge in the outside the company’s own staff. field of planning and design of advanced civil works such as Industrial Plants, Power Stations, Port Facilities, Oil & Gas, Airports, Bridges and Railways. ISC has worldwide experience gained on projects car- ried out in more than 70 countries on five continents. BE A PART OF OUR FUTURE For further information about the products and services ISC Consulting Engineers
    [Show full text]
  • The Committee of the Regions and the Danish Presidency of the Council of the European Union 01 Editorial by the President of the Committee of the Regions 3
    EUROPEAN UNION Committee of the Regions The Committee of the Regions and the Danish Presidency of the Council of the European Union 01 Editorial by the President of the Committee of the Regions 3 02 Editorial by the Danish Minister for European Aff airs 4 03 Why a Committee of the Regions? 6 Building bridges between the local, the regional and 04 the global - Danish Members at work 9 05 Danish Delegation to the Committee of the Regions 12 06 The decentralised Danish authority model 17 EU policy is also domestic policy 07 - Chairmen of Local Government Denmark and Danish Regions 20 08 EU-funded projects in Denmark 22 09 The 5th European Summit of Regions and Cities 26 10 Calendar of events 28 11 Contacts 30 EUROPEAN UNION Committee of the Regions Editorial by the President of 01 the Committee of the Regions Meeting the challenges together We have already had a taste of Danish culture via NOMA, recognised as the best restaurant in the world for two years running by the UK’s Restaurants magazine for putting Nordic cuisine back on the map. Though merely whetting our appetites, this taster has confi rmed Denmark’s infl uential contribution to our continent’s cultural wealth. Happily, Denmark’s contribution to the European Union is far more extensive and will, undoubtedly, be in the spotlight throughout the fi rst half of 2012! A modern state, where European and international sea routes converge, Denmark has frequently drawn on its talents and fl ourishing economy to make its own, distinctive mark. It is in tune with the priorities for 2020: competitiveness, social inclusion and the need for ecologically sustainable change.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: Aarhus
    European Union European Regional Development Fund MP4 Case study report Place-keeping in Aarhus Municipality, Denmark: Improving green space management by engaging citizens Andrej Christian Lindholst Forest and Landscape University of Copenhagen, Denmark May 2010 Aarhus, Denmark 2 MP4 WP1.3 Transnational Assessment of Practice Content Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Context ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 Green spaces............................................................................................................................................ 3 Green space planning and management................................................................................................... 3 Green space maintenance ........................................................................................................................ 4 A ‘red’ circle ............................................................................................................................................. 5 The Project .................................................................................................................................................. 5 The park development plan .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Rapport Om Iværksætterpraktikker
    Iværksætter praktik hos Zealand Maj 2020 Iværksætter praktik hos Zealand Side 2 ı 16 Indholdsfortegnelse 1 Iværksætterpraktik hos Zealand.............................................................................. 3 1.1 Introduktion ................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Data ............................................................................................................................ 3 2 Overblik (2015-2019) ................................................................................................. 4 3 2015 ............................................................................................................................ 7 4 2016 ............................................................................................................................ 8 5 2017 .......................................................................................................................... 11 6 2018 .......................................................................................................................... 12 7 2019 .......................................................................................................................... 14 8 Iværksætterpraktik i ind- og udland ...................................................................... 16 9 Forslag til videre undersøgelse ............................................................................. 17 10 Kilder .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pressefaktaark Regionale Hastighedsopgraderinger
    PRESSEFAKTAARK REGIONALE HASTIGHEDSOPGRADERINGER Dato J. nr. For at give et samlet løft til togtrafikken i hele landet og forstærke den lokale gevinst ved Timemodellen, hastighedsopgraderes en række regionale baner: Aalborg – Frederikshavn Struer – Thisted Langå – Struer Vejle – Struer Esbjerg – Struer Skanderborg – Skjern Bramming – Tønder Holbæk-Kalundborg Køge Nord – Næstved Østerport - Helsingør Tinglev – Sønderborg Hastighedsopgraderingerne vil medføre kortere rejsetider for de rejsende på regionalstrækningerne i Jylland og på Sjælland. Aalborg-Frederikshavn Side 2/12 Når Signalprogrammet er etableret, vil den nødvendige signalteknik til at øge hastigheden på strækningen være til stede. Den maksimale hastighed på stræk- ningen er i dag 120 km/t og den er undersøgt for en opgradering til 160 km/t. Med den netop afsluttede sporfornyelse på strækningen er langt den overve- jende del af sporene allerede opgraderet til 160 km/t. Den samlede anlægsinvestering for hastighedsopgraderingen til 160 km/t vur- deres til 84 mio. kr. (2014 prisniveau) inkl. 50 % tillæg. Rejsetidsgevinsten for rejsen fra Aalborg til Frederikshavn er på op til i alt ca. 16 minutter. Rejsen vil herefter kunne gennemføres på 53 minutter. Hastighedsopgraderin- gen vurderes på hele strækningen at generere en årlig trafik svarende til 53.800 rejser. Med de 16 minutters rejsetidsbesparelse vil en pendler, der rejser mellem Aal- borg og Frederikshavn, hver dag spare over en halv times rejsetid. På en uge vil man kunne spare 2 timer og 40 minutters tid i toget sammenlignet med i dag og det er tid, der fremover kan bruges på familie, fritid, arbejde mv. De moderniserede regionalbaner forudsættes, for at de fulde rejsetidsgevin- ster opnås, betjent med de typer tog, som er velegnede til at udnytte det fulde potentiale i hastighedsopgraderingerne.
    [Show full text]