DOCSLIB.ORG

FOREIGN NON-GOVERNMENTAL FOUNDATIONS in UKRAINE: Areas and Scope of Activities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FOREIGN NON-GOVERNMENTAL FOUNDATIONS in UKRAINE: Areas and Scope of Activities FOREIGN NON-GOVERNMENTAL FOUNDATIONS IN UKRAINE: Areas and Scope of Activities KYIV – 2018 ANALYTICAL REPORT Research editor: Ihor Burakovsky, Head of the Board, Institute for Economic Research and Policy Consulting Authors: Ihor Burakovsky, Head of the Board, the Institute for Economic Research and Policy Consulting. Yevhen Anhel, Research Fellow, the Institute for Economic Research and Policy Consulting. Vitaliy Kravchuk, Senior Research Fellow, the Institute for Economic Research and Policy Consulting. Stanislav Yukhymenko, Junior Research Fellow, the Institute for Economic Research and Policy Consulting. This research was supported by JTI. Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 List of tables .................................................................................................................................................................5 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Why, how and what we write .....................................................................................................................................6 Types of foreign charity foundations: general description ....................................................................................8 Cfs in Ukraine ....................................................................... .................................................................................... 10 Activities of American Charity Foundations in Ukraine .......................................................................12 American CFs and their activities abroad .............................................................................................................12 US CFs and Ukraine ................................................................................................................................................. 13 National Endowment for Democracy ....................................................................................................................16 Open Society Foundations .......................................................................................................................................16 Mott Foundation ....................................................................... ............................................................................... 18 Coca-Cola Foundation .............................................................................................................................................18 Grants from the Bloomberg Foundation ...............................................................................................................19 Other specialized donors .........................................................................................................................................20 Religious and humanitarian donors .......................................................................................................................20 Conclusions ...............................................................................................................................................................20 German Foundations in Ukraine .............................................................................................................22 Political Foundations ................................................................................................................................................22 German Political Party Foundations. History and General Description ...........................................................22 Funding of German Political Foundations ............................................................................................................24 Representative Offices of German Political Foundations in Ukraine ................................................................27 Foundations' Activities in Ukraine .........................................................................................................................28 Partners of Party Foundations in Ukraine .............................................................................................................32 Private German Foundations ..................................................................................................................................33 The Volkswagen Foundation ...................................................................................................................................34 The Robert Bosch Foundation ................................................................................................................................35 Examples of Activities of Other Foundations .......................................................................................................37 Support from Other European Foundations............................................................................................39 UK Foundations in Ukraine ....................................................................................................................................39 The Westminster Foundation for Democracy .......................................................................................................40 The Sigrid Rausing Trust .........................................................................................................................................40 Dutch Foundations in Ukraine ................................................................................................................................43 The Netherlands Institute for Multiparty Democracy (NIMD) .........................................................................43 3 Polish Foundations in Ukraine ................................................................................................................................45 The Stefan Batory Foundation ................................................................................................................................45 Education for Democracy Foundation ...................................................................................................................47 The Polish-American Freedom Foundation ..........................................................................................................50 Slovak Foundations in Ukraine ...............................................................................................................................51 Austrian Foundations in Ukraine ...........................................................................................................................52 Conclusions ...............................................................................................................................................................53 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................... 54 Appendices ............................................................................................................................................... 57 Appendix 1 ................................................................................................................................................................. 57 Appendix 2 ................................................................................................................................................................. 64 4 «Іноземні недержавні фонди в Україні: напрями та масштаби діяльності» Table of figures Figure 1. Grants provided to Ukraine in 2011-2018, according to the Foundation Center ...........................14 Figure 2. Major areas of support in Ukraine in 2011-2018 .................................................................................15 Figure 3. Allocation of budget funds between party foundations in 2017 (EUR m) .......................................26 Figure 4. Key areas of support provided by the Sigrid Rausing Trust since 2004 (GBP'000) .........................26 List of tables Table 1. Major Ukraine's donors in 2011-2018 according to the Foundation Center database.....................13 Table 2. German Political Foundations ..................................................................................................................23 Table 3. Balance of trust / distrust to social institutions in 2017 ........................................................................54 Table 4. Funds provided by donors for use in Ukraine between 2011 and 2018 (based on Foundation Center database, total sum, $) ............................................................................................................55 Table 5. Funds provided by donors for use in Ukraine between 2011 and 2018, with the exception of religios and humanitarian projects (based on Foundation Center database, $) ...........................................60 Table 6. Priorities of foreign foundations in Ukraine ..........................................................................................62 5 Analytical Report Introduction. Why, how and what we write In 2014, the Revolution of Dignity reflected public desire for real political, social and economic changes in society in order to close a historic gap in social and economic standards
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ASD-Covert-Foreign-Money.Pdf
    overt C Foreign Covert Money Financial loopholes exploited by AUGUST 2020 authoritarians to fund political interference in democracies AUTHORS: Josh Rudolph and Thomas Morley © 2020 The Alliance for Securing Democracy Please direct inquiries to The Alliance for Securing Democracy at The German Marshall Fund of the United States 1700 18th Street, NW Washington, DC 20009 T 1 202 683 2650 E [email protected] This publication can be downloaded for free at https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/covert-foreign-money/. The views expressed in GMF publications and commentary are the views of the authors alone. Cover and map design: Kenny Nguyen Formatting design: Rachael Worthington Alliance for Securing Democracy The Alliance for Securing Democracy (ASD), a bipartisan initiative housed at the German Marshall Fund of the United States, develops comprehensive strategies to deter, defend against, and raise the costs on authoritarian efforts to undermine and interfere in democratic institutions. ASD brings together experts on disinformation, malign finance, emerging technologies, elections integrity, economic coercion, and cybersecurity, as well as regional experts, to collaborate across traditional stovepipes and develop cross-cutting frame- works. Authors Josh Rudolph Fellow for Malign Finance Thomas Morley Research Assistant Contents Executive Summary �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 Introduction and Methodology ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • The Committee on Economic Cooperation and Development
    The Committee on Economic Cooperation and Development 2 “The central challenge in develop- ment cooperation is and remains for the state, businesses and society to work together to provide impe- tus to people in partner countries to help themselves. We can achieve this if we cooperate globally to bring about a shift away from short-term crisis management and towards a strategy of sustainable development. Local populations need to muster the creative power to make the most of their potential. The members of the Committee put their confidence in committed people who work to create a decent future in their home countries.” Dr Peter Ramsauer, CDU/CSU Chairman of the Committee on Economic Cooperation and Development 3 The German Bundestag’s decisions are prepared by its committees, which are estab- lished at the start of each elec- toral term. Four of them are stipulated by the Basic Law, the German constitution: the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Defence Committee, the Committee on the Affairs of the European Union and the Petitions Committee. The Budget Committee and the Committee for the Rules of Procedure are also required by law. The spheres of respon- sibility of the committees essentially reflect the Federal Government’s distribution of ministerial portfolios. This enables Parliament to scruti- nise the government’s work effectively. The Bundestag committees The German Bundestag sets political priorities of its own by establishing additional committees for specific sub- jects, such as sport, cultural affairs or tourism. In addition, special bodies such as parlia- mentary advisory councils, The committees discuss and committees of inquiry or deliberate on items referred study commissions can also to them by the plenary.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Global Go to Think Tank Index Report1
    University of Pennsylvania Masthead Logo ScholarlyCommons TTCSP Global Go To Think aT nk Index Reports Think aT nks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) 1-2019 2018 Global Go To Think aT nk Index Report James G. McGann University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks Part of the International and Area Studies Commons McGann, James G., "2018 Global Go To Think aT nk Index Report" (2019). TTCSP Global Go To Think Tank Index Reports. 16. https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/16 2019 Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the University of Pennsylvania, Think aT nks and Civil Societies Program. All requests, questions and comments should be sent to: James G. McGann, Ph.D. Senior Lecturer, International Studies Director, Think aT nks and Civil Societies Program The Lauder Institute University of Pennsylvania Email: [email protected] This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/16 For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2018 Global Go To Think aT nk Index Report Abstract The Thinka T nks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) of the Lauder Institute at the University of Pennsylvania conducts research on the role policy institutes play in governments and civil societies around the world. Often referred to as the “think tanks’ think tank,” TTCSP examines the evolving role and character of public policy research organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • German Polity Export a Critical Discourse Archaeology of the Political Objects of German Development Cooperation with Sub-Saharan Africa
    Universiteit van Amsterdam Graduate School of Social Sciences Research Master International Development Studies MSc Thesis German Polity Export A Critical Discourse Archaeology of the Political Objects of German Development Cooperation with Sub-Saharan Africa. “We are not asked to export our way of life, our forms of production, our political or social structures, but to help others find their own.” Erhard Eppler, 1971, 33 Thesis supervisor: Dr. ir. Y.P.B. Yves Van Leynseele Second reader: Dr. T.A. Mieke Lopes Cardozo Kolja Drescher 12784109 [email protected] Submission: Hannover, 31st of May 2021 Abstract As any discourse affects the real world, political objects in development aid discourse affect the political reality determines the lives of countless people. This paper examines the discourse of Germany as a donor in development aid, focusing on the establishment of “good” political structures. The existing literature has addressed different concepts of political objects (e.g., democracy promotion), their implementation, and effectiveness. Still, no attention has been given to the process of producing these ideas in the context of donors through public discourse. The objective of this research is to verify the assumption that Germany’s domestic political development influences political objects of its development cooperation and to explore whether this imposition can be understood as export of German polity. This qualitative study encompasses examining documents and semi-structured expert interviews as part of a Critical Discourse Analysis. By making use of Foucault’s approaches of archaeology, the analysis serves to unpack the continuities and shifts in the German discourse formation on polity export to Sub-Saharan Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • «Poor Family Name», «Rich First Name»
    ENCIU Ioan (S&D / RO) Manager, Administrative Sciences Graduate, Faculty of Hydrotechnics, Institute of Construction, Bucharest (1976); Graduate, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest (2003). Head of section, assistant head of brigade, SOCED, Bucharest (1976-1990); Executive Director, SC ACRO SRL, Bucharest (1990-1992); Executive Director, SC METACC SRL, Bucharest (1992-1996); Director of Production, SC CASTOR SRL, Bucharest (1996-1997); Assistant Director-General, SC ACRO SRL, Bucharest (1997-2000); Consultant, SC GKS Special Advertising SRL (2004-2008); Consultant, SC Monolit Lake Residence SRL (2008-2009). Vice-President, Bucharest branch, Romanian Party of Social Solidarity (PSSR) (1992-1994); Member of National Council, Bucharest branch Council and Sector 1 Executive, Social Democratic Party of Romania (PSDR) (1994-2000); Member of National Council, Bucharest branch Council and Bucharest branch Executive and Vice-President, Bucharest branch, Social Democratic Party (PSD) (2000-present). Local councillor, Sector 1, Bucharest (1996-2000); Councillor, Bucharest Municipal Council (2000-2001); Deputy Mayor of Bucharest (2000-2004); Councillor, Bucharest Municipal Council (2004-2007). ABELA BALDACCHINO Claudette (S&D / MT) Journalist Diploma in Social Studies (Women and Development) (1999); BA (Hons) in Social Administration (2005). Public Service Employee (1992-1996); Senior Journalist, Newscaster, presenter and producer for Television, Radio and newspaper' (1995-2011); Principal (Public Service), currently on long
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine Page 1 of 39
    2009 Human Rights Reports: Ukraine Page 1 of 39 Home » Under Secretary for Democracy and Global Affairs » Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor » Releases » Human Rights Reports » 2009 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices » Europe and Eurasia » Ukraine 2009 Human Rights Reports: Ukraine BUREAU OF DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND LABOR 2009 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices March 11, 2010 Ukraine, with a population of 46 million, is a multiparty, democratic republic with a parliamentary-presidential system of government. Executive authority is shared by a directly elected president and a unicameral Verkhovna Rada (parliament), which selects a prime minister as head of government. Elections in 2007 for the 450-seat parliament were considered free and fair. A presidential election is scheduled for January 2010. Civilian authorities generally maintained effective control of the security forces. Human rights problems included reports of serious police abuse, beatings, and torture of detainees and prisoners; harsh conditions in prisons and detention facilities; arbitrary and lengthy pretrial detention; an inefficient and corrupt judicial system; and incidents of anti-Semitism. Corruption in the government and society was widespread. There was violence and discrimination against women, children, Roma, Crimean Tatars, and persons of non-Slavic appearance. Trafficking in persons continued to be a serious problem, and there were reports of police harassment of the gay community. Workers continued to face limitations to form and join unions, and to bargain collectively. During the year the government established the Office of the Governmental Commissioner for Anticorruption Policy, and the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Prosecutor General's Office introduced a new system to improve the recording of hate-motivated crimes.
    [Show full text]
  • International Actors of Democracy Assistance in Egypt Post 2011: German Political Foundations
    The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at: www.emeraldinsight.com/2356-9980.htm German International actors of democracy political assistance in Egypt post 2011: foundations German political foundations Ola Ashraf Kubbara Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt Received 3 April 2019 Revised 17 June 2019 23 July 2019 Abstract Accepted 29 July 2019 Purpose – This paper aims at a qualitative investigation and analysis of the complicated situation of the four German Political Foundations (GPFs) – Friedrich Ebert Foundation, Konrad Adenauer Foundation, Friedrich Naumann Foundation and Hanns Seidel Foundation – as actors of democracy assistance in Egypt post 25 January 2011 revolution. It explores the relation between the restrictive political circumstances and the weakness and potential failure of the GPFs while considering their internal structural and operative misconducts as intervening variables. Design/methodology/approach – The researcher uses the qualitative research method and its interpretive practices of data collection. The backbone of this study are the field visits and extensive interviews with the resident representatives of the GPFs in Egypt, and the representatives of the international departments of their headquarters in Germany. These interviews were complemented by further interviews with members of related organizations in Germany, as well as Egyptian professors, diplomats and experts on Egypt and the broader Middle East. The interviewing method is semi-structured in nature and audio-recorded. In Germany, interviews and information were gathered throughout a four-month field-research stay in Germany. Findings – The paper concludes that the restrictive regime and political limitations were determining variables undermining the success of the GPFs in the area of democracy assistance in Egypt post 2011 revolution, while the GPFs’ own operative malfunctions and lack of adaptation to the political reality post 2011 were contributing factors in the process.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly, 2016
    No. 3 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, JANUARY 17, 2016 5 2015: THE YEAR IN REVIEW As war in east continues, Ukraine moves Westward ocket attacks in the east marked the beginning of 2015 for Ukraine. Twelve civilians were killed and R11 were wounded by a missile fired by Russian- backed militants that hit a bus in the town of Volnovakha, 35 kilometers southwest of Donetsk, on January 13. President Petro Poroshenko stated: “This is a disaster and a tragedy for Ukraine. This is more evidence after the MH17 plane, after the many civilian casualties – it is a crime that terrorists from the so-called DNR and LNR [Donetsk and Luhansk peoples’ republics] have severely violated my peace plan, which was approved and support- ed by the European Council and the European Union.” It was yet more evidence also that the ceasefire agreed to in Minsk in September of 2014 was being violated almost daily. As of the beginning of 2015, it was noted that over 4,700 people had been killed and more than 10,000 injured in the fighting in Ukraine’s east that began in April 2014. At year’s end, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights reported that there were now more than 28,000 casualties in Ukraine since the war began, www.president.gov.ua including more than 9,000 killed. In addition to the dead At the Minsk summit on February 12 (front row, from left) are: French President Francois Hollande, Ukrainian and wounded, more than 1.5 million were internally dis- President Petro Poroshenko, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Belarusian President Alyaksandr placed as a result of the conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Overcoming Obstacles. LGBT Situation in Ukraine in 2018 / Nash Mir Center
    LGBT Human Rights Nash Mir Center OVERCOMING OBSTACLES LGBT SITUATION IN UKRAINE IN 2018 Kyiv 2019 УДК 316.343-055.3(477) Overcoming obstacles. LGBT situation in Ukraine in 2018 / Nash Mir Center. - K .: Nash Mir Center, 2019. – 61 pages. This publication presents information that reflects the social, legal and political situation of the LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) people in Ukraine in 2018. It contains data and analyses of the issues related to LGBT rights and interests in legislation, public and political life, and public opinion, and provides examples of discrimination on ground of sexual orientation or gender identity and more. Authors: Andrii Kravchuk, Oleksandr Zinchenkov Project Manager of Nash Mir Center: Andriy Maymulakhin The authors express their gratitude to LGBT organisations and individual activists as well as all active participants of e-mail lists and Facebook groups who collect and exchange up-to-date information on various aspects of the LGBT situation in Ukraine. We also thank J. Stephen Hunt (Chicago, IL) for proofreading the English translation and making other contributions to this publication. This report was prepared according to results obtained through monitoring and human rights defending activities by Nash Mir Center. In 2018 they were supported by the British Embassy in Ukraine, Tides Foundation (USA), the Human Rights Fund of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands, and the State Department of the USA. Opinions expressed by the report’s authors are solely theirs, and should not be considered as the official position of any of the donors to Nash Mir Center. LGBT Human Rights Nash Mir Center Postal address: P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • ECFG-Ukraine-2020R.Pdf
    About this Guide This guide is designed to prepare you to deploy to culturally complex environments and achieve mission objectives. The fundamental information contained within will help you understand the cultural dimension of your assigned location and gain skills necessary for success (Photo: Ukrainian and Polish soldiers compete in a soccer during cultural day at the International Peacekeeping and Security Center in Yavoriv, Ukraine). The guide consists of 2 parts: ECFG Part 1 “Culture General” provides the foundational knowledge you need to operate effectively in any global environment with a focus on Eastern Europe. Ukraine Part 2 “Culture Specific” describes unique cultural features of Ukrainian society. It applies culture-general concepts to help increase your knowledge of your assigned deployment location. This section is designed to complement other pre-deployment training (Photo: A Ukrainian media woman dances as the US Air Forces in Europe Band plays a song in Dnipro, Ukraine). For further information, visit the Air Force Culture and Language Center (AFCLC) website at www.airuniversity.af.edu/AFCLC/ or contact the AFCLC Region Team at [email protected]. Disclaimer: All text is the property of the AFCLC and may not be modified by a change in title, content, or labeling. It may be reproduced in its current format with the express permission of the AFCLC. All photography is provided as a courtesy of the US government, Wikimedia, and other sources. GENERAL CULTURE PART 1 – CULTURE GENERAL What is Culture? Fundamental to all aspects of human existence, culture shapes the way humans view life and functions as a tool we use to adapt to our social and physical environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
    Country Information and Guidance Ukraine: Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Version 1.0 17 December 2015 Preface This document provides country of origin information (COI) and guidance to Home Office decision makers on handling particular types of protection and human rights claims. This includes whether claims are likely to justify the granting of asylum, humanitarian protection or discretionary leave and whether – in the event of a claim being refused – it is likely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under s94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. Decision makers must consider claims on an individual basis, taking into account the case specific facts and all relevant evidence, including: the guidance contained with this document; the available COI; any applicable caselaw; and the Home Office casework guidance in relation to relevant policies. Country Information The COI within this document has been compiled from a wide range of external information sources (usually) published in English. Consideration has been given to the relevance, reliability, accuracy, objectivity, currency, transparency and traceability of the information and wherever possible attempts have been made to corroborate the information used across independent sources, to ensure accuracy. All sources cited have been referenced in footnotes. It has been researched and presented with reference to the Common EU [European Union] Guidelines for Processing Country of Origin Information (COI), dated April 2008, and the European Asylum Support Office’s research guidelines, Country of Origin Information report methodology, dated July 2012. Feedback Our goal is to continuously improve the guidance and information we provide. Therefore, if you would like to comment on this document, please e-mail us.
    [Show full text]
  • Hanns Seidel Foundation: Annual Report 2010
    Hanns Seidel Foundation AnnuAl RepoRt 2010 short version english www.hss.de contentS contentS Foreword ........................................................................ 4 the Hanns Seidel Foundation: facts and figures ........................... 6 Academy for politics and current Affairs ................................... 7 the Berlin office ................................................................ 9 Institute for political education ........................................... 11 Institute for Scholarship programmes .................................... 14 liaison Bureaus/International conferences .............................. 15 office for Foreign Relations ................................................. 21 Institute for International cooperation ................................... 22 Hanns Seidel Foundation Worldwide ...................................... 28 Dr. Hanns Seidel (1901–1961) – whom the foundation is named after – was among the founding fathers of the Christian social union (CSU) in 1945 and party chairman (1955–1961). He was first elected in 1946 to the Bavarian landtag, appointed as Bavarian Minister of econo­ mics (1947–1954) and was the Bavarian Minister-President (1957–1960). For further information see: www.hss.de/ english/organization/hanns-seidel.html dr. Hanns seidel Hanns seidel Foundation | annual RepoRt 2010 3 FoReWord FoReWord In a year marked by spectacular resig- these sentences, spoken by Horst nations, heated debates and by the long seehofer, are just one example of the shadows cast by the
    [Show full text]