Should Single-Sex Schooling Be Eliminated?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Should Single-Sex Schooling Be Eliminated? AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE SHOULD SINGLE-SEX SCHOOLING BE ELIMINATED? MODERATOR: S. E. CUPP, CNN'S “CROSSFIRE” DEBATERS: LISE ELIOT, CHICAGO MEDICAL SCHOOL OF ROSALIND FRANKLIN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE CHRISTINA HOFF SOMMERS, AEI 5:30 PM – 7:00 PM WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 28, 2013 EVENT PAGE: http://live.aei.org/Event/Should_single- sex_schooling_be_eliminated TRANSCRIPT PROVIDED BY: DC Transcription – www.dctmr.com KARLYN BOWMAN: Good afternoon. My name is Karlyn Bowman and I’m a senior fellow here at AEI. And I’d like to welcome all of you and our online audience to this debate. We’re very pleased to be co-sponsoring the debate with the Independent Women’s Forum, an organization that I believe is influencing and infusing competition into the Washington ideas factory on many topics, including the topic of today’s debate. AEI is celebrating its 75th anniversary this year and we’ve been in the debate business for a very long time. I look back to our first debates, more than 40 years ago, in 1967, and the first debate series we had, the very first debate – the very first three debates included Milton Friedman, Arthur Schlesinger, and Paul Samuelson. The earlier debates were serious and they were spirited and I’m confident that today’s debaters will carry on that tradition. It’s a special pleasure to start things off by introducing Sabrina Schaeffer, who will introduce our moderator and also the debaters. Sabrina is the executive director of the Independent Women’s Forum. Before that – before coming to the IWF, she was the managing partner of Evolving Strategies. She’s been a speechwriter. She’s been director of the White House Writers Group. And I first met Sabrina many years ago, when she was a young assistant at AEI, working for Jeane Kirkpatrick, who many of you know Jeane Kirkpatrick’s work from her work on foreign policy, but she also wrote the first full-fledged study of women in politics called “Political Women” many years before. So, Sabrina, I’ll turn it over to you. SABRINA SCHAEFFER: Thank you, Karlyn, and to AEI for reaching out to IWF to help host this debate tonight. I’m sorry Dan Rothschild is not here. I think he’s enjoying Hong Kong, but we owe him a big thanks as well. And as Karlyn mentioned, I got my start here in Washington on the 11th floor. And Karlyn actually helped me – helped secure my second job. So, always good to be back here with friends. I’m Sabrina Schaeffer, the executive director of the Independent Women’s Forum. This is our 21st year in operation. We are the leading women’s group on the right that is focused on economic liberty, free markets, personal responsibility. And for two decades, we have been working to broaden women’s understanding of how policy set here in Washington affect women and their families. So forgive me if I take just a quick minute to tell you about some interesting research that I happened upon about a year ago out of the University of Manchester in the UK that found that men and women are so different that they are practically different species. Psychologist Paul Irwing and his colleagues administered a personality test to more than 10,000 people here in the United States, between the ages of 15 and 92, and measured for 15 different personality facets – warmth, emotional stability, liveliness, on and on. And the results found that about 18 percent of women share similar personalities with men and 18 percent of men share similar personalities with women, but that the majority of women have personality traits that are quite distinct from those of men and vice versa. So the bottom line is that we are finding that, yet again, from this research, the differences between the genders has a lot to do with the choices they make, the way they learn, and the professions they choose to go into. And I mention this only because IWF believes very strongly in gender equality, but we also like to talk a lot about the very real and serious differences between men and women. So I am eager to hear the debate tonight. And to help us get started, I would like to introduce our moderator, S.E. Cupp. S.E. recently became the host of CNN’s “Crossfire” – congratulations – which will begin airing in September. She is a conservative columnist, author, and commentator. She’s the author of “Losing Our Religion: The Liberal Media’s Attack on Christianity.” And she’s the co-author of “Why You’re Wrong about the Rights.” She is a regular columnist at the “New York Daily News,” a contributing editor at “Townhall” Magazine. She’s been published in numerous outlets, from the “Washington Post” to “Human Events,” to Fox News, CNN. You have probably seen S.E. on many, many different programs, from Bill Maher to Larry King. Her face is quite familiar to all of us. And we are thrilled that she is here to help moderate this fascinating debate. (Applause.) S.E. CUPP: Thank you. Thanks to AEI and Karlyn and IWF and Sabrina. Thanks for that introduction. Welcome to the debate “Should Single-Sex Education Be Eliminated?” How’s that for provocative? Full disclosure, I am the product of an all-girls education, at least for four years of high school. That should not tell you where I come down on this issue. And in fact, I am looking forward to hearing from both of our debaters to sharpen my opinion on the issue. Let me introduce our guests here that you’re going to be hearing from. Many of you will be familiar with Christina Hoff Sommers. She is resident scholar here at AEI. Before coming here, she was a professor of philosophy at Clark University, where she specialized in moral theory. She’s the author of several books. I’m sure you’re familiar with some of these titles, including “Who Stole Feminism,” “One Nation Under Therapy,” and “Freedom Feminism.” Her most recent book is entitled “The War Against Boys.” Lise Eliot is an associate professor of neuroscience at the Chicago Medical School of Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science. She is also the author of numerous books. One is called “What’s Going on in There: How the Brain and Mind Develop in the First Five Years of Life.” And another is called “Pink Brain, Blue Brain: How Small Differences Grow Into Troublesome Gaps – and What We Can Do About It.” Now, let me establish some ground rules and tell you about our format. Each of the debaters will give a brief opening statement that highlights the key features of their argument. After those opening statements, both will have a chance to respond to each other. Then, there will be a short two-minute break, during which I will receive questions from the audience. If you have a question, please write it down on your card and complete that question before the opening debates are done. I will also be taking questions from Twitter and our friends online. So if you’d like to tweet in a question, please use the hashtag #AEIDebates. After that two-minute break, we will return and we will have question and answer portion, and then, the debaters will give a final five-minute conclusion and closing statement. The rules. We’d like you to limit your opening remarks to eight minutes each, and then your responses to each other to five minutes each. You’ll be able to see two-minute, one-minute, and 30-second warning cards in the front row. And at the end of your allotted time, a light bell will ring. Can we hear that? There you go. Don’t make me John King you. I will cut you off. (Laughs.) So finish your remark as quickly as possible when you hear that bell. And after the debate is over, of course, the audience is invited to a wine and cheese reception in the registration area. So with that, I’d like to invite our first debater, Lise Eliot, to the floor, and let’s begin. Should single-sex education be eliminated? Thank you. (Applause.) LISE ELIOT: I have to put that up there. And – so thank you very much. I’d like to thank the American Enterprise Institute and the Independent Women’s Forum for hosting this event. And of course, I also want to thank Christina Hoff Sommers for bringing the issue of gender and education into the public eye. I look forward to our discussion. I don’t normally read my remarks, but eight minutes is kind of a challenge, so I’m going to – I’m going to do it that way. And so why is a neuroscientist – excuse me – why is a neuroscientist here debating single-sex education? I was honestly agnostic on the topic when I started researching my book “Pink Brain, Blue Brain” about gender development. But any discussion of gender differences in children inevitably leads to this debate. So I felt compelled to dive into the copious research on single-sex schooling. I read every study I could, weighed the evidence, and ultimately concluded that single-sex education is not the answer to gender gaps and achievement or the best way forward for today’s young people. It may have been in the past, but I don’t think it’s the way forward. After my book was published, I became acquainted to several developmental and cognitive psychologists whose work was addressing gender and education from different angles, and we published a peer-reviewed education forum piece in “Science” with the provocative title “The Pseudoscience of Single-Sex Education.” So “Science” has very tight space constraints.
Recommended publications
  • Contents Executive Summary
    FIU SJMC Undergraduate Self-Study Report for Accreditation Visits in 2014 - 2015 1 Part II, Standard 8. Professional and Public Service Contents Executive summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 1. Summarize the professional and public service activities undertaken by the unit ...................... 3 2. Provide brochures and other publications that describe the unit’s professional and public service activities............................................................................................................................. 19 3. Describe the unit’s contact with alumni, professionals and professional organizations to keep curriculum and instruction .............................................................................................................. 20 4. List examples of professional and public service activities undertaken by members of the faculty in the past six years ........................................................................................................... 21 5. Describe the role of professional and public service in promotion and tenure decisions.......... 27 6. Describe the unit’s support of scholastic (high school) journalism, including workshops, visiting lectures, critiques of student work, etc .......................................................................................... 28 7. Describe the unit’s methods for communicating with alumni, such as newsletters or other publications ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CNN Communications Press Contacts Press
    CNN Communications Press Contacts Allison Gollust, EVP, & Chief Marketing Officer, CNN Worldwide [email protected] ___________________________________ CNN/U.S. Communications Barbara Levin, Vice President ([email protected]; @ blevinCNN) CNN Digital Worldwide, Great Big Story & Beme News Communications Matt Dornic, Vice President ([email protected], @mdornic) HLN Communications Alison Rudnick, Vice President ([email protected], @arudnickHLN) ___________________________________ Press Representatives (alphabetical order): Heather Brown, Senior Press Manager ([email protected], @hlaurenbrown) CNN Original Series: The History of Comedy, United Shades of America with W. Kamau Bell, This is Life with Lisa Ling, The Nineties, Declassified: Untold Stories of American Spies, Finding Jesus, The Radical Story of Patty Hearst Blair Cofield, Publicist ([email protected], @ blaircofield) CNN Newsroom with Fredricka Whitfield New Day Weekend with Christi Paul and Victor Blackwell Smerconish CNN Newsroom Weekend with Ana Cabrera CNN Atlanta, Miami and Dallas Bureaus and correspondents Breaking News Lauren Cone, Senior Press Manager ([email protected], @lconeCNN) CNN International programming and anchors CNNI correspondents CNN Newsroom with Isha Sesay and John Vause Richard Quest Jennifer Dargan, Director ([email protected]) CNN Films and CNN Films Presents Fareed Zakaria GPS Pam Gomez, Manager ([email protected], @pamelamgomez) Erin Burnett Outfront CNN Newsroom with Brooke Baldwin Poppy
    [Show full text]
  • September 9,2005 VIA FACSIMILE and US. MIL Lawrence H. Norton
    3 rnc/, September 9,2005 a VIA FACSIMILE and US.MIL b e Lawrence H. Norton, Esq. LJ General Counsel Federal Election Commission 999 E Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20463 Re: MUR 5225 - Response of Respondents New York Senate 2000 and Andrew Grossman, in his official capacity as treasurer Dear Mr. Norton: We are writing on behalf of the above-referenced Respondents in MUR 5225. Respondents oppose the Office of General Counsel's recommendation of a finding of probable cause to believe that they violated the Federal Election Campaign Act, as amended, 2 U.S.C. 43 1 et seq. (2005). They respectfilly submit that the Commission should take no further action against them in this matter. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND A. New Ysrk Senate 2000 and the Hollywood Gala This matter involves a fundraising event held in Los Angeles on August 12,2000, to benefit New York Senate 2000 ("the Committee"). Formally titled, "The Hollywood Gala Salute to President William Jefferson Clinton and Hillary Rodham Clinton," the event has been referred to sometimes as the "Hollywood Gala," and is described in Committee records as "Event 39." Held at a private estate, the event was a dinner and a concert honoring President William J. Clinton on the eve of the Democratic National Convention. New York Senate 2000 is a joint fundraising committee whose participants included Hillary Rodham Clinton for U.S. Senate Committee, Inc., the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, and the New York State Democratic Party. It was one of [04005-0087MYS2000 Response Sep 9 20051 September 9,2005 Page 2 multiple joint fundraising committees organized during the 2000 election cycle with the participation of the DSCC, to help raise fhds for Democratic Senate candidates.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthony Bourdain 2014 Schedule
    Anthony bourdain 2014 schedule Anthony Bourdain: Parts Unknown is an American travel and food show on CNN which premiered on . Season 4 aired from September to December Anthony Bourdain: Parts Unknown on CNN U.S. (Domestic) Sundays: 9pm EST - 11pm, 2am EST Previous week's episode - 8pm EST Fridays. Season 10 of CNN Original Series Anthony Bourdain Parts Unknown, Launches Sunday, October 1 at 9pm With a Tour of Singapore. Find out when and where you can watch Anthony Bourdain Parts Unknown episodes with TVGuide's full tv listings - you'll never miss another moment from your. Anthony Bourdain: Prime Cuts. ,. A retrospective summarizing each season of "Anthony Bourdain: Parts Unknown." Upcoming Shows. Documentary · Bourdain heads to Jamaica, a destination well known for delicious Caribbean delicacies and feel-good vibes. The host travels along the Northeast. Documentary · Bourdain travels to Mexico City, Oaxaca, and Cuernavaca to commune with local residents who express their passion through food, art, and the. This CNN original series has chef Anthony Bourdain traveling to extraordinary locations around the globe to sample a variety of local cuisines. Watch trailers. Parts Unknown host Anthony Bourdain talks the downside of traveling days per year. Anthony Bourdain: Parts Unknown. Season 10, Episode 4 | Airing On: 10/22/ TV. poster for Anthony Bourdain: Parts Unknown. Anthony Bourdain: Parts. Schedule your hangover (and have some Kung Pao Chicken). pinterest Anthony Bourdain (@Bourdain) April 28, Apparently, Borneo. June 19, If you're working in the kitchen of Anthony Bourdain, legendary chef of Brasserie Les Halles, best-selling author, and famed television. Interview: The Evolution of Anthony Bourdain's 'Parts Unknown'.
    [Show full text]
  • Shanlon “Shan” Wu Is a Former Federal Prosecutor Who Served in The
    [email protected] _____________________________________________________________________ Legal analysis & commentary delivered with clarity, savvy, & humor. Shan excels at breaking down complex legal & political topics into plain language with thought-provoking points of view. He is a CNN legal analyst, appears regularly on National Public Radio & his writing is regularly published in national print & digital platforms. Shanlon “Shan” Wu is a former federal prosecutor who served in the Clinton Administration as Counsel to Attorney General Janet Reno and is now a nationally known criminal defense & college student defense lawyer. He appears regularly on CNN, National Public Radio, podcasts and streaming media, offering insightful, often humorous analysis on issues including the Trump impeachments, Mueller Russian probe, sex crimes and politics inside the Department of Justice. Recent notable cases include his representation of Rick Gates – co-defendant with Paul Manafort – in the Mueller Russian probe as well as the case of Mimi Groves – a University of Tennessee cheerleader who was victimized by “cancel culture.” Shan’s writing on topics such as racism in the law, the Mid-Term Elections, sexual assault, and the Harvard Affirmative Action lawsuit brought by Asian American students, reflects a style honed by a MFA in Creative Writing from Sarah Lawrence College and an English Literature degree from Vassar College. His work has appeared in CNN Opinions, The Washington Post, The Hill, xoJane, and The Daily Beast. As the only child of Chinese immigrants who were political refugees, Shan brings a strong Asian American and minority perspective to the political and legal issues of the day. From his days of being the only Asian amateur boxer in tournaments and the first Asian American to win Best Advocate as both a first-year and upper-classman at Georgetown law school, to now being one of the only Asian lawyers on national television - Shan has always blazed his own trail.
    [Show full text]
  • Again: Indiana’S 2008 Presidential Primary
    The Whole World Was Watching … Again: Indiana’s 2008 Presidential Primary MARJORIE RANDON HERSHEY oosiers do not usually see presidential campaigns in person. We Hknow from media coverage that they are taking place in other states, but we know just as surely that candidates for the presidency do not come to Indiana, with the occasional exception of a trip to raise money. The Indiana primary takes place in May, much too late to make a difference in most presidential nomination races. Presidential candi- dates generally see no reason to visit in the fall campaign, either. Republican candidates have grown accustomed to winning the state’s electoral votes whether they travel to Indiana or not, as has happened in every election since Lyndon Johnson’s landslide victory in 1964. For the same reason, it has long seemed pointless for a Democratic presidential candidate to waste his or her time trying to change that pattern. Hoosiers pay a price for such assumptions. Presidential cam- paigns serve a number of purposes in addition to selecting a winner. A __________________________ Marjorie Randon Hershey is professor of political science and director of the Leadership, Ethics, and Social Action Program at Indiana University. Her research focuses on the media coverage of political campaigns and elections, and she teaches about political parties and inter- est groups, environmental policy, and American politics in general. She is the author of Party Politics in America (13th ed., New York, 2008) and a variety of other books and articles. She has won a series of teaching awards at Indiana University. INDIANA MAGAZINE OF HISTORY, 104 (December 2008) ᭧ 2008, Trustees of Indiana University.
    [Show full text]
  • „Scham Und Schrecken“
    PROGRAMME „Scham und Schrecken“ Der Nachrichtensender CNN steckt in der Krise: Vertraute TV-Gesichter verlassen das Haus, die Zuschauer zappen zur Konkurrenz, Gründer Ted Turner hat nichts mehr zu sagen. Ein neues Konzept soll den US-Sender wieder in Schwung bringen – mit mehr Unterhaltung und weniger Information? ie Philips Arena in Atlanta war voll nen Titel als Vizepräsident“, teilte ihm Le- kurrenzkampf, wie ihn die Welt des Ka- bis zum letzten Sitzplatz. Fast 15000 vin lapidar mit. belfernsehens noch nicht erlebt hat. Die DGäste aus aller Welt waren erschie- Damit war der Einfluss, den sich Turner neu gegründeten Nachrichtenstationen Fox nen, um den 20. Geburtstag von CNN zu beim Verkauf seines Lebenswerks an Time News, MSNBC und CNBC haben nach nur feiern – und dem Mann zu huldigen, der Warner 1996 gesichert hatte, dahin. Mit fünf Jahren große Stücke aus dem CNN- diesen größten und einflussreichsten Nach- dem Abgang des nonkonformistischen Quotenkuchen herausgebissen – mit Kon- richtensender der Welt gegründet hatte. Überzeugungstäters Turner endet eine zepten, die statt nüchterner Nachrichten Doch Ted Turner wusste, dass dies Ära: vorbei die Zeit, als der impulsive Tau- vor allem lärmenden, meinungsstarken Po- sein letzter großer Auftritt sein würde, sendsassa den konservativen Medienmo- lit-Talk liefern. und er nutzte die Chance zu einer ex- gul Rupert Murdoch zum Boxkampf auf- Dem Fox-Lautsprecher Bill O’Reilly ge- zentrischen Vorstellung: „Steck dir deinen forderte und über Kubas Regierungschef lang sogar, was noch niemand vor ihm ge- Mister in den Hintern, nenn mich Ted. In nach gemeinsamer Entenjagd sagte: „Fidel schafft hat: Er schlug in den ersten Mona- einem halben Jahr bin ich ohnehin ar- ist kein Kommunist.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Extreme Media on Political Behavior, Attitudes, and Media Selection
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Political Science Dissertations Department of Political Science Spring 1-23-2013 The Effects of Extreme Media on Political Behavior, Attitudes, and Media Selection James B. Taylor Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/political_science_diss Recommended Citation Taylor, James B., "The Effects of Extreme Media on Political Behavior, Attitudes, and Media Selection." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2013. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/political_science_diss/28 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Political Science at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political Science Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EFFECTS OF EXTREME MEDIA ON POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, ATTITUDES, AND MEDIA SELECTION by JAMES BENJAMIN TAYLOR Under the Direction of Sean Richey ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the role of extreme media (i.e. political talk radio and cable news opinion shows) on the political attitudes of viewers and listeners. I investigate whether extreme media has both positive and negative externalities for democratic citizenship. Specif- ically, I use laboratory experiments, national survey data, and qualitative interviews to test the impact of extreme media on viewers' political knowledge, trust in government, efficacy, and political tolerance. I use laboratory experiments in controlled settings to uncover the impact of viewership on political knowledge, trust in government, and efficacy. I confirm these lab findings with the national survey data, by using propensity score matching and ordered probit models to demonstrate that exposure to extreme media produces political knowledge and efficacy, but decreases trust in government.
    [Show full text]
  • TV Or Not TV--That Is the Question Christo Lassiter
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 86 Article 9 Issue 3 Spring Spring 1996 TV Or Not TV--That is the Question Christo Lassiter Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Christo Lassiter, TV Or Not TV--That is the Question, 86 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 928 (1995-1996) This Criminal Law is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/96/860-0928 THE JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 86, No. 3 Copyright © 1996 by Northwestern University, School of Law Printed in U.S.A. TV OR NOT TV-THAT IS THE QUESTION CHRISTO LASSITER* I. INTRODUCTION The Courtroom Television Network, now in its fifth year, is the first serious commercial effort to televise selected trials nationally and to provide expert commentary on what happens in America's court- rooms.' More than twenty million viewers have access to the Court TV network.2 Court TV has televised more than 340 trials.3 Apart from its entrepreneurial aspirations, 4 Court TV hopes to permit the Ameri- can public to see the inner workings of a trial courtroom.5 * Associate Professor of Law, University of Cincinnati College of Law and "Of Counsel" to the law firm of Fost &Jacobs. B.A. 1978, University of Chicago; MA 1982, University of Michigan;J.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Tonight's Listings
    (S) = In Stereo (N) = NewProgramming For a guide to channel numbers on cable and satellite, look in the (HD) = High Definition Television (PA) = Parental Advisory Movies shaded Tonight’s listings (R) = Restricted Under 17 (NR) = Not Rated Listings subject to change TV Week magazine in Sunday’s Spokesman-Review. Sep. 16 5 pm 5:30 6 pm 6:30 7 pm 7:30 8 pm 8:30 9 pm 9:30 10 pm 10:30 11 pm KREM KREM 2 News at CBS Evening KREM 2 News at Access Holly- The Doctors (N) 4 New Adv.-Old Gary Unmarried Criminal Minds: ... And Back. (S) 5 CSI: NY: Pay Up. (S) 5 (HD) KREM 2 News at 2.1 5 (N) News-Couric 6 (N) wood (N) 4 Christine (S) 5 (HD) (HD) 11 (N) KXLY KXLY 4 News at 5 World News-Gib- KXLY 4 News at KXLY 4 News at Entertainment The Insider (N) Wipeout (N) (S) 4 (HD) (:02) Crash Course (N) (S) 4 (:01) Primetime: The Outsiders (N) KXLY 4 News at 4.1/4.3 (HD) son 6 (HD) 6:30 (HD) Tonight 4 (S) (HD) (S) (HD) 11 (HD) KXMN Star Trek: The Next Generation: Seinfeld (S) 4 Seinfeld (S) 4 KXLY 4 News at KXLY 4 News at World’s Funniest Moments (S) Magic’s Biggest Secrets Finally Re- Entertainment The Insider (N) The Man in the 4.2 The Naked Now. (S) 4 (HD) (HD) 6 6:30 (HD) vealed (S) (HD) Tonight 4 (S) (HD) Iron Mask ›› KHQ News (N) 3 NBC Nightly News (N) 3 Who Wants to Be Jeopardy! (N) 3 Wheel of For- America’s Got Talent: Winner is revealed; Susan Boyle.
    [Show full text]
  • Guest Date Program Label Lance Bass 10/4/2010 Larry King
    Guest Date Program Label Lance Bass 10/4/2010 Larry King Democrat/Liberal Wanda Sykes 10/4/2010 Larry King Democrat/Liberal Kathy Griffin 10/4/2010 Larry King Democrat/Liberal Andrew Breitbart 10/4/2010 Parker Spitzer Republican/Conservative Will Cain 10/4/2010 Parker Spitzer Republican/Conservative Aaron Sorkin 10/4/2010 Parker Spitzer Democrat/Liberal Ari Melber 10/4/2010 Parker Spitzer Democrat/Liberal Elizabeth Warren 10/4/2010 Parker Spitzer Democrat/Liberal Tom Frank 10/4/2010 Parker Spitzer Democrat/Liberal Tom Prichard 10/5/2010 AC 360 Republican/Conservative Alan Grayson 10/5/2010 AC 360 Democrat/Liberal Dick Armey 10/5/2010 Parker Spitzer Republican/Conservative Reihan Salam 10/5/2010 Parker Spitzer Republican/Conservative Dave Zirin 10/5/2010 Parker Spitzer Democrat/Liberal Katrina Vanden Heuvel 10/5/2010 Parker Spitzer Democrat/Liberal Oliver Stone 10/5/2010 Parker Spitzer Democrat/Liberal Doris Kearns Goodwin 10/5/2010 Parker Spitzer Democrat/Liberal Errol Louis 10/5/2010 Parker Spitzer Democrat/Liberal Dana Loesch 10/6/2010 AC 360 Republican/Conservative Marc Lamont Hill 10/6/2010 AC 360 Democrat/Liberal Dinesh D'Souza 10/6/2010 Parker Spitzer Republican/Conservative Michael Gerson 10/6/2010 Parker Spitzer Republican/Conservative Fareed Zakaria 10/6/2010 Parker Spitzer Democrat/Liberal Sam Seder 10/6/2010 Parker Spitzer Democrat/Liberal Steve Kornacki 10/6/2010 Parker Spitzer Democrat/Liberal Simon Schama 10/6/2010 Parker Spitzer Democrat/Liberal Ed Rollins 10/7/2010 AC 360 Republican/Conservative Billy Nungesser 10/7/2010
    [Show full text]
  • Cnn Announces Washington Correspondent Assignments
    CNN ANNOUNCES WASHINGTON CORRESPONDENT ASSIGNMENTS Washington, D.C. – Jan. 18 – Today, CNN Worldwide President Jeff Zucker announced the following assignments for the network’s Washington, D.C. based correspondents. Dana Bash will continue as the network’s chief political correspondent. Gloria Borger will continue as the network’s chief political analyst. Mark Preston has been named CNN’s senior political analyst and David Chalian will continue to serve as CNN’s political director. Jim Acosta and Jeff Zeleny will serve as CNN’s Senior White House correspondents and will be joined at The White House by correspondents Athena Jones and Sara Murray. Jeremy Diamond, Stephen Collinson and Kate Bennett will also serve as White House reporters for CNN. Congress will be covered by Senior Congressional reporter Manu Raju and CNN correspondents Phil Mattingly and Sunlen Serfaty. Jim Sciutto will continue as CNN’s chief national security correspondent. Senior Diplomatic correspondent Michelle Kosinski will join Global Affairs correspondent Elise Labott to cover the State Department. Barbara Starr will continue to cover the Department of Defense as CNN’s Pentagon correspondent and will be joined there by reporter Ryan Browne. The Justice Department and Supreme Court will be covered by Justice and Supreme Court correspondent Pamela Brown, Justice correspondent Evan Perez, Justice reporter Laura Jarrett and Supreme Court reporter Ariane De Vogue. Rene Marsh will continue as CNN’s aviation and government regulation correspondent. MJ Lee will cover health care for the network as national politics reporter. Senior Washington correspondent Joe Johns, national correspondent Suzanne Malveaux, correspondent Tom Foreman, and correspondent Ryan Nobles will serve as Washington correspondents for the network.
    [Show full text]