DOCSLIB.ORG

American Voting : the Local Character of Suffrage in the United States. Alec C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
American Voting : the Local Character of Suffrage in the United States. Alec C University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 1-1-2005 American voting : the local character of suffrage in the United States. Alec C. Ewald University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1 Recommended Citation Ewald, Alec C., "American voting : the local character of suffrage in the United States." (2005). Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014. 2389. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1/2389 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AMERICAN VOTING: THE LOCAL CHARACTER OF SUFFRAGE IN THE UNITED STATES A Dissertation Presented by ALEC C. EWALD Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY February 2005 Department of Political Science © Copyright by Alec C. Ewald 2005 All Rights Reserved AMERICAN VOTING: THE LOCAL CHARACTER OF SUFFRAGE IN THE UNITED STATES A Dissertation Presented by ALEC C. EWALD Department of Political Science DEDICATION To my parents, Gaelen and Richard Ewald, for teaching me to read and to love books. “All the truth lies in the details.” Stendhal, quoted in William J. Novak, The People ’s Welfare: Law and Regulation in Nineteenth-Century> America (1996), at 235. “Yet the texts of the law must be made socially real: enacted, implemented, imposed.” Sally Engle Merry, Colonizing Hawa 'i: The Cultural Power ofLaw (2000), at 218. “The right to vote is protected in more than the initial allocation of the franchise. Equal protection applies as well to the manner of its exercise.” v. Bush Gore , 531 U.S. 98, 104 (2000). “The way they guarded that ballot box, they let us know there was something mighty good in voting.” Charles Evers, describing his exclusion from the registrar’s office in Decatur, Mississippi in 1946. Quoted in Steven F. Lawson, Black Ballots: Voting Rights in 1944-1969 at x. the South, , ACKNOWLEDGMENTS There is a convention of thanking one’s spouse or partner last, presumably for dramatic purpose. I would prefer to remove any doubt that my first and last debt is to my wife Emily, who has supported me in every way imaginable as I have worked on this project. Thank you. I am deeply indebted to John Brigham, who for four years has been showing me how to think closely and creatively about the law. John’s mix of sharp criticism and enthusiastic support has been all that I could have wanted in an advisor and dissertation chair. Shelly Goldman has also served as a mentor and model of scholarship over the past four years; I wish Ray LaRaja had arrived at Massachusetts a year or so earlier, so that I could have learned even more from him than I’ve been able to in the last two years. Many thanks to Betsy Krause of the Anthropology Department, who agreed to work on the project and provided some extremely useful questions and suggestions at an important early point. This committee made the dissertation far more enjoyable than I had hoped it could be. Among the Political Science faculty at the University of Massachusetts, particular thanks to Jerry Mileur, Laura Jensen, Jeff Sedgwick, M.J. Peterson, Dean Robinson, and Barbara Cruikshank. The Department staff made things easy along the way, particularly Donna Dove and Barb Ciesluk. Among my graduate-student colleagues, I would like to thank Lonce Sandy-Bailey, David Clabom, Laura Hatcher, George Thomas, Patrick Campbell, Keith Forrest, and Paul Adams for companionship and motivation. Many, vi many thanks to Barbara Morgan and the other staff of the W.E.B DuBois Library, particularly the anonymous geniuses who run the Inter-Library Loan system. I have been particularly fortunate to receive advice on this and other projects from “non-academics,” among whom Marc Mauer of the Sentencing Project, David Callahan of Demos, and Peter Wagner of the Prison Policy Initiative deserve to be singled out. The Sentencing Project has supported part of this research financially, and all three organizations do superb research-based advocacy. The Brennan Center is part academic institution and part advocacy think-tank; thanks to Jessie Allen, Deborah Goldberg, and the Center for encouragement and inspiration. Listing important personal allies in a project like this is dangerous because important people inevitably will be forgotten. Nonetheless, for inspiration and support particular thanks go to Alyson Ewald, Ian Finseth, Avital Rosenberg, Gwenn Miller, Rich Robinson, Jeff Brown, Adam Schiffer, Dustin Howes, Greg Pettis, Simon Holzapfel, Amy Holzapfel, Doug Jankey, John Roberts, Debbie Mintz, and Joey Chemila. Special thanks to Steve Snyder, for helping me find light places to work during the dark winters, and to Mari Enoch, for her hectoring encouragement in the final months. I would also like mountaineering survival tale Touching the Void to thank Joe Simpson, author of the , for his explanation of how to break a frighteningly gigantic task into its smallest pieces. For musical accompaniment, thanks to Ludwig, Johann, Cannonball, and Bela, among many others. My grandfather, George Ewald, died as I worked towards completing this project. His interest in politics and support gave me the strength to go out and do what needed to love and be done. I have also been sustained for as long as I can remember by the vii encouragement of my grandmothers, Patricia Ewald and Sue Coffin. These are debts that cannot be repaid. This dissertation is dedicated to my parents, Gaelen and Richard Ewald, in gratitude for their having taught me to read and to like books. viii ABSTRACT AMERICAN VOTING: THE LOCAL CHARACTER OF SUFFRAGE IN THE UNITED STATES FEBRUARY 2005 ALEC C. EWALD, B.A., TUFTS UNIVERSITY M.A., UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA - CHAPEL HILL Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Directed by: Professor John Brigham This dissertation examines the local dimension of suffrage in the United States. The U.S. has a hyper-federalized system of election administration, in which county and municipal officials and institutions continue to play important roles, and I demonstrate that a systematic analysis and appreciation of these suffrage practices enhances our understanding of voting rights and American political development. The dissertation makes theoretical, historical, and normative contributions to our ideas about American voting. First, I argue that conceiving suffrage as a practice, rather than merely a formal right or an instrumental behavior, produces a more rich understanding of what Americans actually do at the polls. Historically, I show that prominent roles for local officials and a great deal of variation in voting practices at the county or municipal level have always been components of American suffrage. Such variation - which is today often treated as a scandal or, at best, an historical accident to be rectified - is in important ways a product of purposeful state action, and is closely connected to American ideas about popular local sovereignty and the state. Normatively, I emphasize the redemptive aspects of the today character of American suffrage, challenging what seems to be the prevailing bias IX against things local. I contend not only that local administration of elections is deeply rooted in U.S. history and thought, but also that local administration has at times been an important engine of inclusion, expanding the bounds of suffrage before state and federal law did so. Americans have always voted together in our communities, and have done so for reasons rooted in our fundamental political traditions. x 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vi ABSTRACT CHAPTER 1. VOTING RIGHTS AS SUFFRAGE PRACTICES: THE REDISCOVERY OF PSEPHOLOGY { I The Local Role in Contemporary American Elections 5 II. The Rediscovery of Psephology and the Lessons of 2000 1 III. How We Got Here: Dominant Approaches to Suffrage Before Bush v. Gore 28 IV. Suffrage as a Practice 40 2. THE LOCAL DIMENSION OF AMERICAN VOTING: A BRIEF HISTORY 48 I. Colonial America 52 II. The Early National Period 61 III. Reconstruction and the Late Nineteenth Century 77 IV. The Early Twentieth Century 92 V. The Voting Rights Act Era (and Beyond) 100 3. “DOG TAGS AND DUMP STICKERS:” AMERICAN VOTING, THE STATE, AND THE PRACTICE OF POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY 106 I. “Please come out.” 107 II. Sovereignty Made Real: Suffrage, Sovereignty, and American Voting 115 III. From Dread, Weakness? American State Development and the Perils of the Local Dimension of American Suffrage 124 IV. The Case for Things Local: Madison, Tocqueville, and Contemporary Advocates 132 4. THE CONSTRUCTION OF AMERICAN SUFFRAGE: VOTING PRACTICES IN THE JACKSONIAN CONVENTIONS AND THE AUSTRALIAN-BALLOT ERA 147 I. “The Remaining Record of This Experiment:” The Jacksonian Conventions 149 II. “A Closet of Prayer:” The Australian Ballot and the Trans formation of American Suffrage 176 xi 5. “ANYTHING WITH THE APPEARANCE OF A MAN:” INCLUSION, EXCLUSION, AND LOCAL ADMINISTRATION OF U.S. ELECTIONS 193 L “Implicit messages are no less significant:” Institutional Practices as Components of Democratic Exclusion 196 II. Two Lows for Localism? The Post-Reconstruction Backlash Against Universal Suffrage and The Reforms of the Progressive Era 207 III. “Even Servants, Negroes, Aliens, Jews, and Common Sailors Were Admitted to Vote:” The Inclusive Tradition in American Election Administration 226 IV. Suffrage Qualifications: Law and Practice 243 6. CONVICTS AND COUNTY CLERKS: THE LOCAL DIMENSION OF AMERICAN CRIMINAL DISENFRANCHISEMENT 245 I. “I Have No Desire to Move Forward Quickly:” Florida and the Inclusive Potential of Local Administration of Disenfranchisement Law 251 II. Private Voting, Public Punishment: The Practice of Disenfranchisement in American History 257 III.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Interim Report of the LWVO Primary Election Systems Study Committee
    PRIMARY ELECTIONS SYSTEMS: A NATIONAL PERSPECTIVE -- Interim Report of the LWVO Primary Election Systems Study Committee ABSTRACT: This series of interviews with several academic researchers and voting advocates across the U. S. weighs the merits of Ohio’s current primary election system in non-presidential primaries. It reflects the conflict between those who regard primaries as an internal nomination process by the several political parties and those who regard them as vehicles whereby all voters reduce their candidate choices to the most viable, competitive few. Ohio’s semi-open partisan primary system met with admiration from many respondents who compared it to the alternatives. Only a few recommended that Ohio consider a top-two system or another alternative which would do away with primaries altogether. Interviewees unanimously cautioned would-be reformers, also, against the likelihood of unspecified, unintended consequences which could accompany any change. Several secondary changes might also improve Ohio’s primary election system, according to most. Mandatory Board of Election distribution of an inclusive Voter Guide and turning Election Day into a holiday were most frequently mentioned. Many other useful suggestions emerged, including even several not on the questionnaire. Some even argued for expanded, constructive involvement of political parties. Leagues of Women Voters in ten or twelve states are studying or already involved in advocacy for primary election reforms. This report documents responses from several state Leagues, although several of the most involved state Leagues did not respond to the survey. In general, Leagues tended to take a realistic rather than an abstract academic view of reforms, especially those that were still studying the issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Nandita Kathiresan the Forgotten Voices
    Nandita Kathiresan The Forgotten Voices in the Fight to Suffrage Political cartoons are unique in the sense that they allocate many interpretations regarding a critical matter based on an individual's outlook of their environment. People of all backgrounds have a special ability to interpret these visuals differently which presents the issue, such as the effects of slavery, in diverse ways as opposed to words on paper. To begin, since the colonization of the United States, slavery was a broad topic that encompassed most, in not all parts of living during the time period. African-American men and women were restricted basic rights up until the end of the Civil War, where they were considered citizens, yet lacked the privilege of suffrage. After the 15th amendment, all men were granted this right, yet women were not presented with such a freedom. Consequently, during the time period of the mid-1800s, women within the country decided to share their voice surrounding the topic of suffrage. The rapidly changing environment in the country gave women the power and strength to fight for this piece of freedom during the Reconstruction Era in numerous marches, such as the Women’s Suffrage Procession. However, it is merely assumed that all women contributed as an equal voice to this important cause, yet black women fell short asserting their voices. This was not due to a lack of passion—rather is the suppression of the freedom of speech covered up by the white, female protesters. Despite living in a country with rapid, positive changes in society, black women were often the forgotten voices fighting for suffrage despite their hidden voice pleading for reform in the late 1800s.
    [Show full text]
  • ~I~I ~I~ ~I~ Dfa-Aa
    Date Printed: 02/05/2009 JTS Box Number: 1FES 52 Tab Number: 10 Document Title: NATIONAL CIVIC REVIEW: THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT AT THIRTY Document Date: 1995 Document Country: USA Document Language: ENG 1FES 1D: EL00754 ~I~I ~I~ ~I~ * 5 6 DFA-AA * WHEN REFORMED LOCAL GOVERNMENT DOESN'T WORK CINCINNATI CITIZENS DEFEND THE SYSTEM .......-VIEW THE C1 ; CONTENTS ________..... V.. OL,.UM __ E.. 84'''' ... NU... M iiiBE_R4 FALL-WINTER 1995 CHRISTOPHER T. GATES THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT Publisher DAVID LAMPE AT THIRTY Editor EDITORIAL BOARD Long considered the most successful civil rights refonn Itgislation o/the 19605, the Voting Rights Act Jaceson CHARLES K. BENS uncertain future as it enters its fourth decade. The principal Restoring Confidence assault involves challenges to outcome-based enforcement of BARRY CHECKOWAY the Act intended to ensure minority representation in addition Healthy Communities to electoral access. DAVID CHRISLIP Community Leadership PERRY DAVIS SYMPOSIUM Economic Development 287 ELECTION SYSTEMS AND WILLIAM R. DODGE REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY Strategic Planning By Joseph F. Zimmerman LEONARD j. DUHL Healthy Communities An overoiewofthe key prouisionsojthe Act and major amendments (1970, 1975 and 1982), with PAUL D. EPSTEIN discussion of landmark judicial opinions and their Government Performance impact on enforcement. SUZANNE PASS Government Performance 310 TENUOUS INTERPRETATION: JOHN GUNYOU SECTIONS 2 AND 5 OF THE Public Finance VOTING RIGHTS ACT HARRYHATRY By Olethia Davis Innovative Service Delivery A discussion of the general pattern of vacilla­ ROBERTA MILLER tion on the part of the Supreme Court in its interpre­ Community Leadership tation of the key enforcement provisions of the Act, CARL M.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Suffrage
    BLACK SUFFRAGE: THE CONTINUED STRUGGLE by Danielle Kinney “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.“ (1) These words, penned by Thomas Jefferson in America's famed Declaration of Independence, are widely known to all, and are thought by many to be at the heart of what it means to be American – to be equals. But in many regards, and speaking in a historical context, this equality has been much more difficult to achieve than it was so simply, and aptly, stated in 1776. Though the issue of equality, or historic lack thereof, can be viewed through the lens of nearly any fundamental and constitutional right, the issue can be seen perhaps at its clearest when applied to suffrage: the right to vote. “One person, one vote“ (2) upon the nation’s founding did not apply to all citizens and was, in fact, a privilege reserved only to the nation’s landholding elite—white, hereditarily wealthy males. Women and the black population, by contrast, had to work tirelessly to achieve this level of equality. While the path to women’s suffrage was without a doubt a struggle, no single demographic faced more of an arduous uphill climb towards that self- evident truth that “all men are created equal“ than America’s black population. From being held in the bondage of slavery, to becoming free yet still unequal, to finally having voting equality constitutionally protected only but a half- century ago, the path to voter equality—and equality in general—has been one met with constant challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact on Issues 2018-2020 a GUIDE to PUBLIC POLICY POSITIONS
    LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS Paperback Book ® OF THE UNITEDCover Template STATES IMPACT8.5” XON 11” Book ISSUES 2018-2020(215.9mm X 279.4mm) A Guide to Public Policy Positions 0.25” Spine Width (6.292mm) White Paper Front 8.5” x 11” 1730 M Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036 I 202.429.1965 I lwv.org (215.9mm x 279.4mm) Impact on Issues 2018-2020 A GUIDE TO PUBLIC POLICY POSITIONS Introduction 2 Environmental Protection and Pollution Control 54 Taking Action: Working Together Air Quality 55 to Influence Public Policy 3 Water Resources 56 Principles 6 Solid Waste 57 Nuclear Waste 58 Summary of Policy Positions 7 Climate Change 63 REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT 10 Public Participation 64 Voting Rights 13 Agriculture Policies 65 Citizen’s Right to Vote 13 DC Self-Government and SOCIAL POLICY 68 Full Voting Representation 19 Equality of Opportunity 68 The Election Process 20 Employment 69 Apportionment 20 Fair Housing 70 Redistricting 21 Nondiscrimination & Affirmative Action 70 Money in Politics (formerly Pay Equity 71 Campaign Finance) 23 Equal Rights for Women 71 Selection of the President 28 Same Gender Equality 72 Citizen Rights 29 Education 72 Citizen’s Right to Know/ Citizen Participation 29 Federal Role in Public Education 75 Individual Liberties 31 Fiscal Policy 76 Constitutional Amendment Proposals 32 Health Care 78 Constitutional Conventions 32 Immigration 81 Public Policy on Reproductive Choices 33 Meeting Basic Human Needs 82 Congress and the Presidency 35 Income Assistance 83 Congress 35 Housing Supply 84 The Presidency 36 Transportation 84
    [Show full text]
  • Review Essay Assessing California’S Hybrid Democracy
    5 HASEN FINAL.DOC 10/21/2009 8:56 AM Review Essay Assessing California’s Hybrid Democracy The Coming Age of Direct Democracy: California’s Recall and Beyond. By Mark Baldassare† & Cheryl Katz††. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2007. Pp. 247. $72.00 cloth; $24.95 paper. Democracy by Initiative: Shaping California’s Fourth Branch of Government. By the Center for Governmental Studies†††, second edition, 2008. Pp. 402. Available for download without charge online at http://cgs.org/images/publications/cgs_dbi_full_book_f.pdf, or by hard copy through request to the Center for Governmental Studies. Party of One: Arnold Schwarzenegger and the Rise of the Independent Voter. By Daniel Weintraub††††. Sausalito, CA: Polipoint Press, 2007. Pp. 235. $19.95 hardcover. Reviewed by Richard L. Hasen††††† INTRODUCTION In the early part of this decade, it appeared that California voters stood to use the devices of direct democracy—the initiative, referendum, and the recall—to take a more major role in crafting the state’s public policy. In 2003 California for the first time recalled a sitting governor, Gray Davis, and replaced him with actor-bodybuilder Arnold Schwarzenegger.1 Copyright © 2009 California Law Review, Inc. California Law Review, Inc. (CLR) is a California nonprofit corporation. CLR and the authors are solely responsible for the content of their publications. † President and Chief Executive Officer, Public Policy Institute of California. Ph.D., Sociology, University of California, Berkeley; M.A., Sociology, University of California, Santa Barbara. †† Independent public opinion researcher and journalist. ††† Non-profit, non-partisan organization focused on enhancing individuals’ participation in their communities and governments.
    [Show full text]
  • Deadline for Filing Declaration of Party Affiliation Forms Is Wednesday, April 14, 2021
    UNION COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS PUBLIC NOTICE TO VOTERS OF UNION COUNTY PRIMARY ELECTION PARTY DECLARATION INFORMATION State Law requires that certain voters file a Declaration of Party Affiliation form no later than 55 days before the date of the Primary Election in order to vote in that election. The Primary Election will be held on Tuesday, June 8, 2021. Therefore, voters who are required to file these forms must complete a Declaration of Party Affiliation form and file it with the Commissioner of Registration or the Municipal Clerk no later than April 14, 2020 in order to be eligible to vote in the Primary Election. YOU MUST FILE A DECLARATION OF PARTY AFFILIATION FORM IF YOU WISH TO VOTE IN THE PRIMARY ELECTION OF A POLITICAL PARTY OTHER THAN THE PARTY WITH WHICH YOU ARE CURRENTLY AFFILIATED. You need not file a Declaration of Party Affiliation form by April 14, 2021 in order to vote in the June 8, 2021 Primary Election if: 1. You are currently affiliated with the political party in whose primary you wish to vote. 2. You have never declared a political party, and have never previously voted in a primary election. You may declare your party affiliation at the polling place on the day of the Primary Election. Your choice of party affiliation can then be changed only if you complete a Declaration of Party Affiliation form and file it with the Commissioner of Registration or the Municipal Clerk. 3. You are a newly registered voter and the June 8, 2021 Primary Election is the first primary at which you are eligible to vote.
    [Show full text]
  • Ida B. Wells, Catherine Impey, and Trans -Atlantic Dimensions of the Nineteenth-Century Anti-Lynching Movement
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2003 Ida B. Wells, Catherine Impey, and trans -Atlantic dimensions of the nineteenth-century anti-lynching movement Brucella Wiggins Jordan West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Jordan, Brucella Wiggins, "Ida B. Wells, Catherine Impey, and trans -Atlantic dimensions of the nineteenth- century anti-lynching movement" (2003). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 1845. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/1845 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ida B. Wells, Catherine Impey, and Trans-Atlantic Dimensions of the Nineteenth Century Anti-Lynching Movement Brucella Wiggins Jordan Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Amos J.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Primaries Could Further Diminish Parties While Boosting Independent Groups
    Open Primaries Could Further Diminish Parties While Boosting Independent Groups JEFF BRINDLE • 04/13/18 3:16 pm Colorado is about to put into place a misguided plan that could further weaken an already ailing political party system. Over the opposition of the state’s political parties, the voters approved Proposition 108 in 2016. This measure ushers in an era of open primaries in the Western State. For Colorado’s voters who are registered members of a political party, the move will dilute their ability to select candidates who best represent their views in the general election. Even more worrisome is the fact that Colorado’s Proposition 108 is the result of a national campaign, whose efforts, if successful, could destroy the party system in much of America. Fortunately, New Jersey isn’t likely to embrace such a transformation anytime soon. New Jersey isn’t one of the 26 states plus the District of Columbia that allow voters to put questions on the public ballot. Only the Legislature has that ability and until now has shown no inclination to put such a sweeping change before voters. In Colorado, party members now must share the responsibility of picking a general election candidate with unaffiliated voters who may decide to vote in one party’s primary this year and another party primary the next. These unaffiliated voters don’t have a real stake in the party’s governmental philosophy or platforms. Without having any tie to a political party, 1.4 million unaffiliated voters in Colorado will get to influence the selection of a party’s general election candidates.
    [Show full text]
  • Catana Barnes Independent Voters of Nevada Testimony to PCEA
    August, 2013 To: The Members of the Commission on Election Administration From: Catana L Barnes, President, Independent Voters of Nevada RE: Statement for Public Comment Dear Members, My name is Catana L Barnes; I am the founder and president of Independent Voters of Nevada. We represent the 251,462 voters (18 percent of the electorate) in Nevada who are registered to vote as independents. I am also here to present statements from independent leaders from Arizona, California, Oregon and Utah as they could not be here today to present their statements to you personally. Independents are independents for specific reasons. We don’t like the gridlock created by party ideologies and we don’t want to be controlled by a party. However, because election administration is organized along bipartisan lines, we face barriers which prevent us from fully participating. In Nevada, independents are subject to a designation by election administrators as “nonpartisans”. There are many states in fact where independents are not able to register simply as independent. Instead, election administrators call them “undeclared” “unaffiliated, “declined to state” and “other”. This nomenclature reflects the partisan bias of that runs throughout the election administration systems nationwide. Independents, who again comprise 18% of the electorate in Nevada, are excluded from voting in the primary elections because, like 18 other states, our primary elections are closed to any voter who is not a Democrat or a Republican. This is despite the fact our tax dollars contribute to funding the primary elections. This is unacceptable. In addition, independents in Nevada and in other states do not receive timely information about the elections or voting rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    Fisher 1 The Votes of the “Privileged Fair”: Women’s Suffrage in New Jersey, 1776-1807 Louis Fisher Senior Thesis April 2011 Advisor: Professor Emma Winter Second Reader: Professor Evan Haefeli Word Count: 15,608 (20,558 including footnotes) Fisher 2 Acknowledgments The completion of this project represents the capstone of my undergraduate studies, and there are many people who deserve thanks for their contributions and advice. I would first like to thank all of the excellent professors with whom I have had the privilege to study at Columbia. These teachers introduced me to many exciting ideas, challenged me in my development as a student of history, and repeatedly demonstrated why the study of history remains an important intellectual pursuit. I am especially indebted to Professor Emma Winter for her advice and encouragement in seminar, and for reading numerous drafts, followed by helpful and discerning comments each time. Professor Evan Haefeli also provided vital criticisms, which improved both the outcome of this project and my understanding of historical writing. I am also grateful to Mike Neuss for his support and interest in discussing this thesis with me in its earliest stages. My friends and fellow thesis writers also deserve recognition for offering to read drafts and for taking an interest in discussing and challenging my ideas as this project took shape—my friends and colleagues at Columbia have undoubtedly contributed in many ways to my intellectual development over the past four years. Finally, I would like to thank both of my parents and my family for their love and support, and for providing me with the opportunity to pursue all of my academic goals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacy of Woman Suffrage for the Voting Right
    UCLA UCLA Women's Law Journal Title Dominance and Democracy: The Legacy of Woman Suffrage for the Voting Right Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4r4018j9 Journal UCLA Women's Law Journal, 5(1) Author Lind, JoEllen Publication Date 1994 DOI 10.5070/L351017615 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California ARTICLE DOMINANCE AND DEMOCRACY: THE LEGACY OF WOMAN SUFFRAGE FOR THE VOTING RIGHT JoEllen Lind* TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................ 104 I. VOTING AND THE COMPLEX OF DOMINANCE ......... 110 A. The Nineteenth Century Gender System .......... 111 B. The Vote and the Complex of Dominance ........ 113 C. Political Theories About the Vote ................. 116 1. Two Understandings of Political Participation .................................. 120 2. Our Federalism ............................... 123 II. A SUFFRAGE HISTORY PRIMER ...................... 126 A. From Invisibility to Organization: The Women's Movement in Antebellum America ............... 128 1. Early Causes ................................. 128 2. Women and Abolition ........................ 138 3. Seneca Falls - Political Discourse at the M argin ....................................... 145 * Professor of Law, Valparaiso University; A.B. Stanford University, 1972; J.D. University of California at Los Angeles, 1975; Candidate Ph.D. (political the- ory) University of Utah, 1994. I wish to thank Akhil Amar for the careful reading he gave this piece, and in particular for his assistance with Reconstruction history. In addition, my colleagues Ivan Bodensteiner, Laura Gaston Dooley, and Rosalie Levinson provided me with perspicuous editorial advice. Special acknowledgment should also be given to Amy Hague, Curator of the Sophia Smith Collection of Smith College, for all of her help with original resources. Finally, I wish to thank my research assistants Christine Brookbank, Colleen Kritlow, and Jill Norton for their exceptional contribution to this project.
    [Show full text]