Jewish education Melamdim and mehankhim – who are we? Implications for professionalizing Orthodox Jewish education Jeffrey Saks

This article puts forth an argument for new lines of inquiry and deliberation in the process of professionalizing Orthodox Jewish education. Using ‘professionalization’ to describe a process that emanates from within the profession and its practitioners, and not issues (such as salary, benefits, status, etc.) which are largely controlled by those working outside of the profession, the author argues for the development of a Jewish theory of education as a hallmark of enriching our communal endeavor – enabling us to fulfill the decree of ‘walking in His ways’ as we educate the Jewish people.

‘And Torat Hessed ( of kindness) upon her tongue’ and thereby on the Jewish community at large. (Prov. 31:26) – Is there a Torah which is not a Torat We have then something truly ironic about our Hessed? Some say: Torah for teaching is the Torah of profession: the degree to which it is viewed in the kindness. (Sukkah 49b) simplest fashion is the degree to which it becomes most sublime. We imagine God Himself (as it s is well known, the , Rabbi Joseph B. were) sitting, Soloveitchik, often referred to himself as a lehrnen Humash In teaching Torah we are not A mere melamed – a simple teacher. and Rashi with only fulfilling that mitzvah, However, the Rav would continue, this is a most the smallest honorable title, as the Almighty Himself too is schoolboy (as but the commandment of merely a simple teacher, for we refer to him each the Rav himself imatateo Dei as well morning in birkhat ha-Torah as the melamed Torah le- would do in the amo Yisrael.1 In teaching Torah we are not only hallways of his Maimonides School). One might fulfilling that mitzvah, but the commandment of falsely deduce that the professionalization of Rabbi Jeffrey Saks is the founding director of imatatio Dei as well. Jewish education – that is, an ongoing effort to ATID— the Academy for Similarly, Nehama Leibowitz left instruction upgrade and sophisticate, to introduce hiddush, Torah Initiatives and Directions, in Jerusalem. that her gravestone be marked only with the word: with the set of values and complexities that ATID is an independent Morah – Teacher. Surely there is something necessarily accompany such a process – somehow institution aiming to foster new and significant paradoxical in the preeminent rabbinic sage, the diminishes the very holiness of what we do. thought and strategies for rabbi par excellence, and the preeminent teacher of However, nothing could be further from the truth. the crucial issues facing Torah education, and is Tanakh – or, if you will, the rabbi’s rabbi and the Educating the Jewish people is a holy task, and the currently running long- teacher’s teacher – choosing to refer to themselves complexities of doing it correctly in the range professional and institutional development as merely simple melamdim. Certainly both of these contemporary world demand that those entrusted projects at London’s figures were aware, albeit in a deeply humble way, with the task develop the sophistication to Immanuel College and at King Solomon High of their deep impact on generations of students succeed, and to lead this enterprise to new levels of School.

Le’ela June 2001 49 Saks Melamdim and mehankhim – who are we?

improvement, development, and the run of everyday work, and the occupation has had accomplishment. the aura of a special mission honored by society. But This paper argues that the degree to which we social ambiguity has stalked those who undertook the begin to look upon ourselves as educators mission, for the real regard shown those who taught has (mehankhim) and not merely teachers (melamdim, never matched the professed regard. Teaching is a status morim), will not only mark a level of reflection on accorded high respectability of a particular kind; but and analysis of the practice of our craft. It will also those occupying it do not receive the level or types of signal our endeavor as being vision-driven (among deference reserved for those working in the learned other things), and will in a very real way professions, occupying high government office, or contribute to the enrichment of our communal demonstrating success in business.5 endeavor – enabling us to fulfill the divine decree of ‘walking in His ways’ as we educate our These are indeed important additional students. In order to undertake this paradigm shift, components in the future professionalization of this heshbon ha-nefesh, we must determine what the Jewish education (and general education!), but lay characteristics of a profession are in general, and outside of the scope of the thesis presented here – for Jewish education specifically.2 Only then will which argues that first and foremost Jewish we be able to consider how Jewish education ranks educators must forge a professional self-identity for as a profession (according to these criteria), by way themselves, primarily through the development of of determining areas for improvement. Jewish theories of education. It is important to note from the outset that – Among the internal ‘commonplaces’ of for the purposes of this essay – I use the category professionalization where we score the highest of ‘professionalization’ to describe a process that mark is the area of teaching as life in the service of emanates from within the profession (that is, an others and of the community as a whole. This is articulation of goals rooted in theoretical an area which is particularly rich in traditional conceptions of general education and Torah sources, but those which often serve as ‘little more education, than a medley of edifying ideas, raw material for the process can be activated which are then after-dinner speeches by well-meaning applied to community leaders, consisting of no more than only by combining all of the enriching our exhortation and perhaps enrichment’.6 players to develop a general practice), and The late Rabbi Isadore Twersky, formulated not issues (such this ‘calling’ and the goals of Jewish education as Jewish theory of education as salary, follows: benefits, status, etc.) which are largely controlled by those Our goal should be to make it possible for every Jewish working outside of the profession.3 By focusing on person, child or adult, to be exposed to the mystery and ‘internal’ professionalization, I do not mean that romance of Jewish history, to the enthralling insights and this is something which educators can or should special sensitivities of Jewish thought, to the sanctity and do alone, in isolation from those who sit ‘outside’ symbolism of Jewish existence, and to the power and the profession. On the contrary, the process can profundity of Jewish faith Education, in its broadest be activated only by combining all of the players – sense, will enable young people to confront the secret of teachers and administrators and lay leadership, Jewish tenacity and existence, the quality of Torah formal and informal educators, academics and teaching which fascinates and attracts irresistibly. They elementary school personnel, students of yeshivot will then be able, even eager, to find their place in a and of universities – to develop a general Jewish creative and constructive Jewish community.7 theory of education.4 However, on the topic of the ‘external’ indicators of the profession, the remark In his teachings on Maimonides’ view of of Dan Lortie, the sociologist of education, rings pedagogy, Rabbi Twersky8 also pointed to true for us as well: Rambam’s formulation in The Guide of the Perplexed (I, 15): [T]eaching, from its inception in America, has occupied a special but shadowed social standing. The services ‘And, behold, the Lord stood erect upon it’ [referring to performed by teachers have usually been seen as above the ladder in Jacob’s vision, see: Gen. 28:13], that is, was

50 June 2001 Le’ela Jewish education

stably and constantly upon it – I mean upon the ladder, personality. 12 one end of which is in heaven, while the other end is We can here refer to R. Kalonimus Kalman upon the earth. Everyone who ascends does so climbing Shapira’s classic work on Jewish education, Hovat up this ladder, so that he necessarily apprehends Him HaTalmidim.13 In the introduction (addressed to who is upon it, as he is stably and permanently at the top ‘melamdim ve-avot ha-banim’, teachers and fathers), of the ladder. It is clear that what I say here of Him R. Shapira wrote: conforms to the parable propounded. For the angels of God [seen by Jacob going up and down the ladder] are Our goal here is not to teach the craft of pedagogy – how the prophets with reference to whom it is clearly said: to utilize the student’s mind in various ways, how to ‘and He sent an angel’ [Num. 20:16] How well put is broaden his understanding and knowledge of the the phrase ‘ascending and descending’ [Gen. 28:12], in meaning of the Torah. For what we are seeking now is which ascent comes before descent. For after the ascent not the student’s intellect alone: we are interested in the and the attaining of certain rungs of the ladder that may whole student. We wish to connect the Nefesh, Ruach, and be known comes the descent with whatever decree the Neshamah of Jewish children to the God of Israel, so that prophet has been informed of – with a view to governing they will emerge as Jews who revere the word of the and teaching the people of the earth.9 Lord and direct all their desires toward Him.

Rabbi Twersky read this passage as a clear That is, the thrust of Hovat HaTalmidim is not moral calling to educators (here titled prophets – pedagogical (i.e. the art and skills of teaching) per educators par excellence10 ), whose ascent to heaven se, but educational. The educational program that and knowledge of God is attained only in tandem he advocates holds as its central goal the educating with the mandate to ‘descend’ to the people, and of the whole student – not merely in knowledge serve as agents of the knowledge of God, as well as growth, but in spiritual development, until he vessels for ahavat Hashem (love of God), as Rabbi becomes ‘connected to the God of Israel’ and Twersky went on to point to the Midrash (Sifrei, assiduously ‘reveres His word’. Deut. 32), that ‘“To love the Lord thy God” [Deut. The ability to be a more effective educator is 6:5, is fulfilled through] bringing others to the strengthened by developing a certain professional love of Him, as did Abraham ’11 self-awareness in which teacher, student (both the We have here an abundantly clear call to service individual student and the class as a whole) and which expresses itself as a moral duty of the subject matter highest order. However, this can only be the are brought into teaching represents the beginning of professionalism, and not the ultimate a level of accord objective. It is a sine qua non, but not an end in as alluded to in techniques and methods that are itself, in pursuit of an increasingly sophisticated the Hovat employed in the process we call education and a genuine Jewish theory of HaTalmidim. education. That is, to educating, but is not itself the educate the ultimate fulfillment of the mitzvah Toward a Jewish theory of education ‘whole’ student Let us understand that teaching (l’lamed) requires an of education represents the techniques and methods that are awareness, on employed in the process we call educating the part of the educator, of the ‘whole’ which is (l’hanekh), but is not itself the ultimate fulfillment within one’s pedagogy, and within oneself. This is of the mitzvah of education. Without neither a small nor simple task, but is mandatory if overextending the metaphor, we can relate this to the educator will serve as the ‘connector’ between the Brisker conception of the dichotomous nature the student, subject matter, and, ultimately, God of ma’aseh and kiyyum, in which certain mitzvot are Himself. broken down into component parts. For example, Let us take another example of a guiding in Rabbi Soloveitchik’s treatment of teshuva, the Jewish theory of education from the writing of act of repentance is accomplished through the Rabbi Aharon Lichtenstein: recitation of confession, while the fulfillment of the mitzvah is wholly internal, comprising resolve The encounter with God as commander lies at the heart for the future and refinement of the repentant’s of Jewish existence; to the extent that it is realized

Le’ela June 2001 51 Saks Melamdim and mehankhim – who are we?

through Torah, the legal corpus, as developed in intelligible.15 the Oral tradition, is a prime vehicle for this encounter The process [of ] is no less Why do so many of our students consider important than its resolution; and even if one has themselves ‘outsiders’? What can be done to get retained nothing, the experience itself – live contact with them to view themselves in the ‘light of Jewish the epiphanous divine will manifest through Torah, and commitment and experience’? Intuitively and encounter with the divine Presence, which hovers over from my own experiences I am convinced that its students – is immeasurably important. Talmud Torah Rabbi Lichtenstein is correct in this theory, but is not just informative or illuminating; it is ennobling how do we properly implement it pedagogically? and purgative. 14 How do we create a ‘theory-driven practice’ to bridge those two worlds (theory and practice) that Rabbi Lichtenstein makes a serious curricular so often stand against each other or (worse) with point, which (if utilized) can help answer a serious their backs turned toward each other? problem in our current educational practice. Many By ‘theory driven practice’, I mean the act of of our students (and, I dare say, their parents) are ‘translating’ (what others might call ‘applying’) at best curious, and at worst deeply troubled by the from theoretical guiding principles to the act of question of why we dedicate the overwhelming teaching in a way which a theory of ‘Jewish bulk of our time commitment and experience’ as a whole is our ‘method of educating’ to the study of translated into a systematic method of educating. Torah she-ba’al Of course, our ‘method of educating’ must strive must strive towards being all Peh (primarily, towards being all encompassing – schools and encompassing – cradle to Talmud), when, synagogues, informal and adult education, etc., it seems to including (but not limited to) the content and grave education them, so few configurations of these educational settings – in a students obtain word: cradle to grave education.16 an independent mastery of the material and this Of course, as noted above, this can only allocation of time leaves many other important properly be done after the development of an subjects relegated to secondary status or curricular educational philosophy deeply grounded in a well- oblivion. articulated, explicit theory of education.17 Rabbi Lichtenstein presents us with a clear Through a level of self-reflection, the impact of guiding theory for our practice: Torah she-ba’al Peh expertise, and critical examination, educators and reigns supreme because it is, in its ideal state, best communities can develop this level of edifying able to create the ‘encounter’ between the student self-awareness that enables the development and and ‘God as commander’. In the words of the implementation of theories of practice. Hovat HaTalmidim, the student becomes However, to develop this sense of professional ‘connected to the God of Israel revering the self-awareness is no simple thing. To a certain word of the Lord’. The question then properly is degree it requires a ‘stepping outside’ of oneself, not why we teach so much Talmud, but why aren’t one’s setting, and (at times) even one’s we being more successful in using it as a tool to community, in order to evaluate the practice qua forge that encounter? Why aren’t we focusing profession. This is an important point. A certain more resources on determining how to forge the level of inertia (engendered by our high ideals) encounter in the first place (especially insofar as prevents us from this ‘stepping out’ – or better yet, generating the encounter is more pedagogically hit’alut, stepping above ourselves – which allows us complex in the modern world). Rabbi to be self-critical, and (just as important) to be Lichtenstein continues: open to critique from others. ‘Stepping above’ is actually the most appropriate figure of speech for To an outsider, much of traditional Talmud Torah no what we are describing, as the word ‘theory’ itself doubt borders on the absurd. From a purely rational or comes from the Greek theorein – which means pragmatic perspective, the prospect of a group of laymen beholding, or speculating from above.18 studying the minutiae of complex and often ‘irrelevant’ Furthermore, this ‘distancing’ from practice halakhot may indeed be bizarre. In light of Jewish allows us to draw from a body of theory, which commitment and experience, however, it is thoroughly defines the very profession, and enables us to

52 June 2001 Le’ela Jewish education

reactivate the deeper guiding principles in an study in Israel and at University after high ongoing way. However, as alluded to above, there school. is a fear that the very act of perspective taking The element of ‘beautifying inquiry’ – hiddur diminishes the sanctity of educating, because the mitzvah – that I am here arguing for is represented ‘stepping outside’ is misunderstood to be a by a level of critical self-examination (both stepping away from Jewish tradition and culture. individually and communally) that enables us to On the contrary! Traditional sources must explicate and clarify the theories of education that serve as the basis for our theory of education and can and should be informing our practice. Our vision for each educator and the community they tradition calls for the enrichment of practice will lead. Professionalization requires that we through examination of theory and a deliberative develop the strategies necessary to actualize and process. implement this theory and vision. Jewish tradition Let us momentarily expand upon this halakhic serves as a crucial resource in molding a young metaphor of hiddur mitzvah. We know that there is educator’s understanding of his or her profession. an obligation to beautify the mitzvot,21 even up to a Unfortunately, these sources often merely serve as one-third increase in cost beyond what would slogans, and have often not been fully processed to otherwise minimally fulfill the halakhic offer the guiding theory into hinukh.19 requirement.22 In almost every case, this Among other things, successful education is obligation, while a mandatory ideal, does not ex the expression of a healthy community, here post facto invalidate the performance of the mitzvah defined as one which has a sense of common if omitted. Perhaps the most notable exception, in values, ideas about the world, certain shared which a lack of hiddur does invalidate the mitzvah, assumptions, and (perhaps most importantly) a is in the writing of a Torah scroll. The example clearly articulated vision of what an educated from the Talmud [TB Gittin 20a] is the case of a student (=initiate into the community) ought scribe who, while writing God’s name in the ‘look’ like. It is only a sign of self-confidence for a Torah momentarily thinks of something else, thus community to look from within, and draw upon invalidating the Torah for lack of the specific its own sources (in a sophisticated and fully requirement of kavannah – special intent – upon ‘processed’ way) to shape this vision. writing God’s holy name. Too often we confuse the kiyyum ha-mitzvah of The Talmud speculates that the scribe might teaching and learning Torah – which, from a rewrite over the kavannah-void four letters, this purely normative standpoint, is the same for the time with the am ha’aretz sitting reciting Tehillim and the talmid mandatory successful education is the hakham who ‘builds worlds’ through his innovative intent – but interpretations of talmudic texts20 – with the deep rejects this expression of a healthy reflection on developing goals and methods that possibility, for community are specific to each educational setting. Ironically, the Name the fact that we are so committed – ethically, (although now morally, spiritually – to what we are doing, opens a kavannah-empowered) would be blemished with loophole which occasionally allows us to escape splotches (i.e. lacking hiddur) due to the second responsibility for the level of critical inquiry coat of ink. In this case, a lack of hiddur mitzvah necessary to perfect our craft, and thereby enhance invalidates the scroll even ex post facto.23 If this is and beautify the mitzvah. Simply put, we are often true for God’s name in a Torah scroll, put off from critically examining ourselves because homiletically we may extend it to Jewish the ‘mitzvah meter’ in heaven is running no matter education as a whole, for what is hinukh if not the what we learn, so why tinker? A similar form of dispersion of God’s name to the Jewish people ‘loophole’ is our commitment to life-long and the world?24 Imagine, if you can, a world in learning, which (when reduced merely to a slogan) which we would add one-third in the name of serves as an excuse not to learn – ‘If learning hiddur mitzvah to the resources (not merely Gemara is something you’re supposed to do for financial, but of energy, emotion, commitment, your whole life, then can you not do it after passion, intellect, talent, etc.) currently dedicated graduating from an Ivy League college?’ – I seem to Jewish education! Efforts (such as those to recall someone asking me upon my decision to described here) toward the professionalization of

Le’ela June 2001 53 Saks Melamdim and mehankhim – who are we?

hinukh are mandated – perhaps even biblically – in Only in this way can we create a genuine Jewish the name of hiddur mitzvat hinukh. theory of education, and not merely a theory of Jewish education. What should an educator be? We must ask ourselves: What are the conceptions Profession as community of learners of what an educator is (or ought to be)? What is an Another necessary element toward the educated student? Indeed, what are the very goals professionalization of Jewish education, along the of our communal educational enterprise as derived model presented above, is the creation of a from our own resources and traditions? Further professional community which, most would agree, we must ask, what are the given meta-theories of does not exist in a meaningful enough way at Jewish education or Jewish educational practice? present. Only after deliberating upon these questions The nature of teaching is such that teachers – should we introduce outside systems or from the very beginning of their careers – spend conceptions as a way of evaluating our own most of their time in isolation from their internal rigor, thoroughness, etc. colleagues – that is, behind classroom doors. Much attention has recently been placed on Classroom teachers make hundreds of decisions the role of the mimetic in contemporary Jewish every day, and do so in isolation from peers or life.25 Ironically, it is quite possible that Jewish supervisors. Often, young educators resist seeking educating is so intrinsic to our lives (both out advice, fearing to admit their shortcomings. In personally and the best of our educational settings, mentoring and communally), supervision are rare, and when it does exist Only in this way can we create a and something experienced colleagues can at best only be present that we do so for a small fraction of beginner’s classroom genuine Jewish theory of naturally, as part activities.27 education, and not merely a of our mimetic As Lortie has written: tradition (‘this is theory of Jewish education the way we do it Teaching is not like other crafts and professions, whose because this is members talk in a language specific to them and their the way we’ve work Without such a framework, the neophyte is less always done it’; or ‘this is what we learn, because able to order the flux and color of daily events and can this is what we’ve always learned’), that it miss crucial transactions which might otherwise be becomes arduous to critically examine. That this encoded in the categories of a developed discourse. Each is historically not true does not seem to bother teacher must laboriously construct ways of perceiving the mimetic consciousness, which is, ironically, and interpreting what is significant.28 somewhat ahistorical – we imagine all of the preceding generations learning what and how we Naturally, this de facto nature of teaching limits do. We live off the spiritual capital of the past,26 opportunities for collaboration, cross-fertilization which renders critical self-scrutiny (either of ideas, and mentorships. individually or communally) a difficult yet The hallmark of our conception for intellectual necessary task, primarily due to this emotional growth is the Talmudic dictum [TB Ta’anit 23a]: involvement. give me ‘intellectual collaboration’ or give me death! After developing a conception of Jewish Anyone who has spent any time inside a Bet theories of education, the fields of general Midrash knows the benefits of the dichotomous education and educational meta-theory (including, partnership/oppositional relationship of hevruta.29 inter alia, the fields of sociology, psychology, Just as it is imperative that mehankhim continue philosophy) can then also (perhaps must) be their own learning once in the field, it is crucial examined, and not feared or negated, as a source of that they be encouraged and given the opportunity crucial insight for professionalization. However, to participate in discourse with colleagues, and when we do turn to ‘outside’ sources it must be in (especially) that young educators be given the a disciplined way, not as a form of cheap imitation opportunity to develop meaningful professional or to provide more of the ‘slogans’ mentioned relationships with senior staff. Further, I would above. argue, it is not enough that such a culture should

54 June 2001 Le’ela Jewish education

Through the process and components of professionalization, we can become mehankhim-educators, and only then do we approach the true melamed be created within an individual school, but we 1903–1906 (Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois must seek out ways of fostering this dialogue University Press 1977) pp.249–72. throughout our community, both in the Diaspora 3 For useful treatments of these ‘external’ professionalizing and Israel.30 For our profession to flourish, each factors in Jewish education (although not specifically for young mehanekh must become part of a community Orthodoxy, per se), see Joseph Reimer, ed., To Build a of mehankhim who are simultaneously a Profession: Careers in Jewish Education (Waltham, MA: community of learners. Brandeis University 1987); Isa Aron, Toward the Professionalization of Jewish Teaching (Commission on Conclusion Jewish Education in North America 1990); and Adam And so we come full-circle. Through the process Gamoran et al., The Teachers Report: A Portrait of Teachers in and components of professionalization, we can Jewish Schools (Council for Initiatives in Jewish become mehankhim-educators, and only then do Education 1998). we approach the true Melamed – as did Rabbi 4 In this the ideals of education qua profession seem to me Soloveitchik, Nehama Leibowitz, and all great to be unique. Are there any other professions which Torah teachers throughout the ages. It is difficult ‘combine all the players’ to define the indicators of to approach the sublime, but it is worthwhile – professionalism? In medicine the patient is certainly not indeed, obligatory. We have been given a great gift, a player in establishing the parameters for the Torat Hashem Temimah, along with a great community of professionals – despite the fact that the challenge: Will we turn it into Torat hesed of the practice of medicine clearly effects them in the most highest order? Torat hesed only exists if it is part of direct way! the ongoing transmission of education – but it 5 Dan C. Lortie, Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study (Chicago: must be done well. Educators must develop for University of Chicago Press 1975) p.10. For an update themselves, and for their communities, Jewish on Lortie’s groundbreaking research, see Eugene theories of education which can drive their Provenzo, Jr., and Gary N. McCloskey, Schoolteachers and practice. We must work amongst communities of Schooling: Ethoses in Conflict (Washington: National teacher-learners, committed to professional and Academy Press 1996). For our own professed regard for personal growth, and together implement a level teaching, see, inter alia, Maimonides, MT Talmud Torah, of hiddur mitzvah as we educate the Jewish people. ch. 5–6. 6 Michael Rosenak, Roads to the Palace: Jewish Texts and Notes Teaching (Oxford: Berghahn Books 1995) p.xi. This essay was part of a larger project undertaken under 7 R. Isadore Twersky, A Time to Act: The Report of the the auspices of the Jerusalem Fellows program, and has Commission on Jewish Education in North America benefited from the insights of: Susan Handelman, Joel (University Press of America 1990) p.19. B. Wolowelsky, and especially Daniel Marom. 8 Rabbi Twersky presented this in the context of the 1 See, e.g.: R. Hershel Schachter, Nefesh ha-Rav (Jerusalem deliberations of the ‘Educated Jew’ project at the Mandel 1994) p.70. It is significant to note the version of the Institute of Jerusalem, where his task was to articulate blessing according to the Siddur of R. Amram Gaon is the Maimonidean theories of education. His essay will ‘ha-melamed Torah le-amo yisrael berahamim – teaches be included in the forthcoming Visions of Learning: Variant Torah to His people Israel in mercy’. The talmudic source Conceptions of Jewish Education (ed. S. Fox, I. Scheffler, of the blessing is TB Berakhot 11b. and D. Marom). 2 Among the research in general education which has 9 In general, compare the Maimonidean parable of helped inform my thinking on this, see esp.: Lee S. ascending the ladder in order to descend with God’s Shulman, ‘Theory, Practice, and the Education of teaching, with Plato’s cave in his Republic, book VII: 518– Professionals’, The Elementary School Journal 98:5 (1998) 19, in which the prisoners must return to the cave after pp.511–26. Additionally, see John Dewey, ‘The Relation having been freed and seen the light of the sun, as of Theory to Practice in Education’, in Jo Ann Boydston, Socrates there states: ed., John Dewey – The Middle Works, 1899–1924, vol. 3: They [the best minds] must continue to ascend until

Le’ela June 2001 55 Saks Melamdim and mehankhim – who are we?

they arrive at the good; but when they have elevated and purified through Torah study and ascended and seen enough we must not allow them mitsvot, so too all worlds of which man is a prototype to do as they do now – that they remain in the [cf. Nefesh HaHayyim I, 6] likewise become purified, upper world: but this must not be allowed; they refined, and elevated. must be made to descend again among the prisoners 15 Rabbi Lichtenstein, ibid. Prof. Susan Handelman points in the cave out that Torah she-ba’al Peh as the central element in the To be sure, for Plato the obligation to return to the cave forging of the encounter with the divine raises the is morally and even epistemologically different than special issue of women’s education – where traditionally Maimonides’ conception – which surely views Torah she-ba’al Peh was not studied (or, certainly not as knowledge as impacting on the entire world of being and the heart of the curriculum). Even in our generation, knowledge being implicitly relational, whereas Plato is where this has begun to change, we dare not exempt describing the politically driven necessities of having ourselves from considering how the encounter via philosophers at the head of the State. Talmud Torah is forged for young women who may not 10 Cf. Maimonides’ formulation in MT Talmud Torah 4:1, spend the bulk of their time studying Talmud. based on Malakhi 2:7, that a teacher ought be a 16 On the configurations of educational settings, see: ‘messenger (=malakh/angel) of the Lord of hosts’. Lawrence A. Cremin, ‘Toward an Ecology of Education’, 11 Let us remember that ahavat Hashem is no small thing, in Public Education (NY: Basic Books 1976). see: MT Yesodei HaTorah 2:2, 4:12, e.g. And what is 17 On the relationship of theory and practice in Jewish Jewish education’s ultimate goal if not ahavat Hashem ve- education see Seymour Fox, ‘Towards a General Theory torato? We are well adjured to recall the remark of of Jewish Education’, in David Sidorsky, ed. The Future of Nehama Leibowitz, who not only wrote, but exemplified the American Jewish Community (New York: Basic Books in her own teaching the idea that ‘[a] teacher must 1973) pp.260–70. Rosenak, Roads to the Palace , p.99, has always remember that our primary goal is not to increase defined ‘translation’ as: knowledge rather, to increase ahavat HaTorah – that an attempt, usually by an expert, to render a concept the words of Torah should be beloved and dear to the located in a mode of discourse that is student’. See her Limud Parshanei HaTorah ve-Derakhim le- incomprehensible to particular hearers, because they Horatam (Jerusalem 1978) introduction. don’t know it or don’t take it seriously, into an idiom 12 Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik, On Repentance, chap. 1. that does make sense to them and evokes interest in 13 R. Kalonimus Kalman Shapira (1889–1943) of them, so that they are enabled to learn something Piaseczno, also known as the rebbe of the Warsaw from the (original) concept. Ghetto, wrote his Hovat HaTalmidim as a statement of the Rosenak specifies that his conception of ‘translation’ basic principles of his transformative educational differs from those of Schwab. See e.g., Joseph J. Schwab, method. Surprisingly, no one has yet written a ‘Translating Scholarship into Curriculum’, in S. Fox and comprehensive analysis of this method, or attempted to G. Rosenfeld, ed., From Scholarship to the Classroom: apply it to a contemporary setting. See, however, the Translating Jewish Tradition into Curriculum (New York: JTS forward by Aharon Sorasky in A Student’s Obligaion: 1977) pp.1–30, and ‘The Practical 3: Translation into Advice from the Rebbe of the Warsaw Ghetto, trans. Micha Curriculum’, School Review (August 1973) pp.501–22. Odenheimer (Northvale, NJ: Aronson 1991). This 18 Although, of course, our theories often legitimately passage appears on p.6. come from below; that is, they emanate out of our 14 Rabbi Aharon Lichtenstein, ‘Study’, in Arthur A. Cohen experiences in practice. and Paul Mendes-Flohr, eds, Contemporary Jewish 19 See Rosenak, ibid., introduction, pp.xi–xvi, for Religious Thought (New York: Scribner 1987) p.933. challenges facing the development of clearer theories Compare Rabbi Lichtenstein’s remark with that of the and philosophies of Jewish education. Nefesh HaHayyim I, 21: 20 For more on this see Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik, This is the Law of Man: When one busies himself Halakhic Man (Philadelphia: JPS 1983) part II, ‘His with Torah study lishmah, in order to observe and Creative Capacity’. fulfill all that is written therein, he cleanses his body 21 There are even opinions, most notably that of the from head to toe Just as in immersion [in a Ra’avad, who hold this obligation to be biblically mikveh] the Sages have declared that the entire body mandated (Ex. 15:2, ‘This is my God, and I will glorify/ must be immersed in the water [cf. TB Eruvin 4b], beautify Him’), while others maintain that the obligation so too must one be totally immersed in the words of is merely rabbinic in force. Torah [And] just as the whole body becomes 22 TB Bava Kama 9b; TY Peah 1:1.

56 June 2001 Le’ela Jewish education

23 See Yoreh De’ah, 276:2, and Shach #2 (according to Teachers College 1998), for an example of teachers the opinion of the hakhamim in Gittin). See also Rabbi portfolios (which document the complexities of what Joseph B. Soloveitchik, Reshimot Shiurim – Sukkah (New happens behind the classroom doors) as an avenue York 1989), ed. Rabbi H. Reichman: 110–14; and toward greater personal reflection and collegial Hiddushei Hatam Sofer to Gittin 20a. collaboration. 24 Remember the remark of Nachmanides, introduction to 29 See TB Taanit 7a on hevruta study’s ability to ‘sharpen’ Commentary on the Torah, that all of the letters of the the student in the way one knife is sharpened against the Torah itself – joined beginning to end – comprise one of next, and TB Eruvin 53b–54a for the story of Bruriah God’s names as well. who literally whacked a student she observed learning 25 See esp. Haym Soloveitchik, ‘Rupture and silently to himself (instead of verbalizing the word of his Reconstruction: The Transformation of Contemporary study), because she understood the importance of the Orthodoxy’, Tradition 28:4 (1994) pp.64–130. dialogical nature of Torah study – even if it occurs alone. 26 Ibid., pp.84–6 and 123, n. 63. 30 In Jerusalem recently, Rabbi Chaim Brovender, myself, 27 We know that in many yeshiva day-schools there is no and others, have founded ATID (Academy for Torah mentoring or supervision at all. Initiatives and Directions) along the lines of the models 28 Lortie, op. cit., pp.73–4, see also, pp.192–6. Compare this presented here, in which young educators participate in to the model of training and apprenticeship in the an in-service Fellowship, working on specific personal training of doctors, for example. However, see the model research and group projects under the guidance of senior presented in: With Portfolio in Hand: Validating the New mentors. Teacher Professionalism, ed. Nona Lyons (New York:

Le’ela June 2001 57 Saks Melamdim and mehankhim – who are we?

58 June 2001 Le’ela