A Will for Willa Cather

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Will for Willa Cather View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Missouri School of Law Missouri Law Review Volume 83 Issue 3 Article 7 Summer 2018 A Will for Willa Cather Thomas E. Simmons Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Thomas E. Simmons, A Will for Willa Cather, 83 MO. L. REV. (2018) Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol83/iss3/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Missouri Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Simmons: A Will for Willa Cather A Will for Willa Cather Thomas E. Simmons* ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................ 642 I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 642 II. DISCUSSION.................................................................................................. 647 A. Artistic Sensibilities and the Desire to Preserve and Obscure ............. 648 B. Origins and a Brief Introduction to Trust Architecture ........................ 665 C. Types of Trusts: A Proposed Taxonomy ............................................... 671 1. Charitable Purpose Trusts .............................................................. 674 2. Noncharitable Purpose Trusts ........................................................ 679 a. Trusts for Masses, Gravesites, etc........................................... 680 b. Trusts for Pets ......................................................................... 683 c. Trusts for Other Noncharitable Purposes ................................ 687 d. The Purpose Enforcer as Proxy for an Ascertainable Beneficiary .......................................................................... 691 e. The Res Purpose Trust ............................................................ 693 f. The Hybrid Purpose Trust ....................................................... 694 g. Artistic Limitations, Virtue, and Vision: Drafting Hints ........ 697 3. A Tricky Income Tax Matter ......................................................... 701 D. Stumbling Blocks .................................................................................. 704 1. Contemporary Stumbling Blocks for Purpose Trusts .................... 705 a. The Rule Against Perpetuities (RAP) ..................................... 705 b. The Rule Against Accumulations (RAA) ............................... 711 c. Unreasonable Restraints on Alienation ................................... 714 d. Rules Against Capriciousness ................................................ 716 2. The Noncharitable Equivalent to Cy Pres ..................................... 719 E. Noncharitable Purpose Trusts: Recognition Achieved ......................... 731 1. The Evolution: Honorary Non-Trusts ............................................ 731 2. The Revolution: Enforceable Noncharitable Purpose Trusts ......... 733 3. Statutory Approaches: A Selective Survey .................................... 735 F. A Will (and a Testamentary Trust) for Willa Cather ............................ 741 III. CONCLUSION .............................................................................................. 749 * Associate Professor, University of South Dakota School of Law. Section II.C.3 of this Article originated as a paper titled “Income Tax Concerns with Purpose Trusts” presented by the author at the Tax Update XXXIX CLE of the State Bar of South Da- kota and the Committee on Continuing Legal Education in December of 2017 in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Thomas E. Simmons, Income Tax Concerns with Purpose Trusts, Presentation, State Bar of South Dakota and the Committee on Continuing Legal Edu- cation Tax Update XXXIX CLE, Sioux Falls, SD (Dec. 8, 2017). Thank you to Pro- fessor Edward A. Morse, the McGrath, North, Mullin, and Kratz Endowed Chair in Business Law and former-President of the University Faculty at Creighton University School of Law, for his helpful comments on some of the tax issues raised in this Article. His generous help should not be seen as an endorsement of any of my views. All errors are my own. Published by University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository, 2018 1 Missouri Law Review, Vol. 83, Iss. 3 [2018], Art. 7 642 MISSOURI LAW REVIEW [Vol. 83 ABSTRACT Artists hold their creative works dear. Whether paintings, poems, or songs, their human creators treat them with special care and often desire that same care be exercised after death. Some may wish to ban the use of a song in a television commercial. Others may wish to stop their novel from being turned into an animated Disney movie. But directing particular uses of property from the grave can be met with several objections and legal impediments. The ob- jections sound in alarmist responses to “dead hand control.” The impediments include the Rule Against Perpetuities, uncertainty, capriciousness, and the re- pugnancy of restraints on alienation. This Article considers these and other recurring objections and impediments in one particular context and with one particular variety of creative works in mind: an author’s unpublished and pri- vate letters to her friends. A mechanism for achieving an artist’s restrictions over the use of her creative works after death is introduced in the form of a purpose trust. Purpose trusts are typically utilized by pet owners to ensure the continued care and preservation of their pets after the owner’s death. Purpose trusts are unique in that they lack ascertainable beneficiaries to enforce the trustee’s duties. Many purpose trusts do not qualify as charitable trusts, which can be enforced by the state attorney general’s office. Instead, a private “en- forcer” must be provided. Here, a noncharitable purpose trust designed to restrict access to an author’s private correspondence is introduced: a testa- mentary trust hypothetically created under the terms of the Last Will and Tes- tament of the celebrated twentieth-century American author Willa Cather. “Considering the circumstances, dead authors are a prolific group.” - Eva E. Subotnik, Artistic Control After Death, 92 WASH. L. REV. 253, 259 (2017) “I’ve got one! I’ve got a special purpose!” - Steve Martin, as Navin Johnson, THE JERK (Universal Pictures, 1979) I. INTRODUCTION Consider a songwriter who wants to ban the use of her music in adver- tisements or an author intent on eliminating the possibility that her novel will be optioned to a filmmaker. The law frowns upon these sorts of alienability limitations and use constraints.1 Property – including intellectual property – 1. See, e.g., JOHN CHIPMAN GRAY, RESTRAINTS ON THE ALIENATION OF PROPERTY 279 (2d ed. 1895) (“Any provision restraining the alienation, voluntary or involuntary, of an estate in fee simple or an absolute interest in chattels real or personal, whether legal or equitable, is void”); Steven J. Horowitz & Robert H. Sitkoff, Uncon- stitutional Perpetual Trusts, 67 VAND. L. REV. 1769, 1771 (2014) (“American law . imposes a handful of anti-dead hand public policy constraints . .”); Michael D. Kirby, Comment, Restraints on Alienation: Placing a 13th Century Doctrine in 21st Century Perspective, 40 BAYLOR L. REV. 413, 413 (1988) (“[T]he concept of free alienability is https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol83/iss3/7 2 Simmons: A Will for Willa Cather 2018] A WILL FOR WILLA CATHER 643 comes with an assorted bundle of use and alienability rights.2 The law detests unreasonable restraints on alienability.3 Courts have deterred owners from placing use limitations on property that bind future owners.4 Restraints on al- ienation are said to be repugnant, as are future interests that vest too remotely.5 The dead hand is feared and the living hand is protected.6 Exceptions can be noted, such as short-term use limitations between contracting parties, equitable servitudes, and the nearly extinct determinable estates.7 These exceptions, however, are generally present either in commercial or charitable contexts.8 In the private noncharitable donative context, which we will be concerned in the pages that follow, use and alienability limitations are more closely scrutinized.9 a cornerstone of modern Anglo-American civilization . .”); see also Dunlop v. Dun- lop’s Ex’rs, 132 S.E. 351, 354 (Va. 1926) (holding that an attempt to condition a devise of a business with a requirement that the devisee share three-fourths of the sale proceeds with other heirs if the business was later sold constitutes an unreasonable restraint, re- pugnant to the estate, and was therefore void). 2. E.g., Kaiser Aetna v. United States, 444 U.S. 164, 176 (1979); Phila. Eagles Football Club, Inc. v. City of Phila., 823 A.2d 108, 123–24 (Pa. 2003); JOHN G. SPRANKLING, UNDERSTANDING PROPERTY LAW 5 (3d ed. 2012). Typically, the four most important property rights are rights to exclude, transfer (i.e., alienate), pos- sess/use, and destroy. Id. 3. E.g., In re Jeromos’ Will, 166 N.Y.S.2d 959, 959 (Sur. Ct. 1957) (holding that a devise of realty with the limitation that “he can dispose of the house only to his daugh- ter” was void as an attempt to limit the devisee’s power of alienation). 4. See Kirby, supra note 1, at 415–29
Recommended publications
  • If You Like My Ántonia, Check These Out!
    If you like My Ántonia, check these out! This event is part of The Big Read, an initiative of the National Endowment for the Arts in partnership with the Institute of Museum and Library Services and Arts Midwest. Other Books by Cather About Willa Cather Alexander's Bridge (CAT) Willa Cather: The Emerging Voice Cather's first novel is a charming period piece, a love by Sharon O'Brien (920 CATHER, W.) story, and a fatalistic fable about a doomed love affair and the lives it destroys. Willa Cather: A Literary Life by James Leslie Woodress (920 CATHER, W.) Death Comes for the Archbishop (CAT) Cather's best-known novel recounts a life lived simply Willa Cather: The Writer and her World in the silence of the southwestern desert. by Janis P. Stout (920 CATHER, W.) A Lost Lady (CAT) Willa Cather: The Road is All This Cather classic depicts the encroachment of the (920 DVD CATHER, W.) civilization that supplanted the pioneer spirit of Nebraska's frontier. My Mortal Enemy (CAT) First published in 1926, this is Cather's sparest and most dramatic novel, a dark and oddly prescient portrait of a marriage that subverts our oldest notions about the nature of happiness and the sanctity of the hearth. One of Ours (CAT) Alienated from his parents and rejected by his wife, Claude Wheeler finally finds his destiny on the bloody battlefields of World War I. O Pioneers! (CAT) Willa Cather's second novel, a timeless tale of a strong pioneer woman facing great challenges, shines a light on the immigrant experience.
    [Show full text]
  • South Dakota Vs. Minnesota Trust Law Desk Reference Guide
    South Dakota vs. Minnesota Trust Law Desk Reference Guide Advantage South Dakota Minnesota For over 30 years, SD has been Like many states, MN has one of the best places to locate attempted to catch up to SD by a trust. A unique and active implementing the Uniform legislative trust committee, Trust Code. However, the Trust Location (Situs) favorable Legislature and difference is still clear and governor support continues to distinct, and the state does not rank SD as a top tier trust have the stability or support jurisdiction state; as verified by that SD enjoys from the industry leaders. government. In addition to many other taxes, MN taxes its trusts. In 2018, the There is no state personal, Fielding v. Commissioner of corporate, or fiduciary income Revenue decision highlighted tax, as well as no state tax on this major difference, holding State Taxes capital gains, dividends, that a trust set up as a MN trust interest, intangibles, or any may not need to stay a resident other income. This equates to trust for tax purposes for the NO state taxes on trust income. entire length of the trust (depending on circumstances). A Dynasty Trust has unlimited possibilities because there is no Rule Against Perpetuities MN has a Rule Against The Dynasty Trust - Legacy (abolished in 1983). Dynasty Perpetuities. By statute, all Trusts avoid federal estate and non-vested interests must vest Planning for Generations income taxation on trust assets (pass) 21 years after death of an because there is no forced asset individual or 90 years after its distribution and the bonus of creation.
    [Show full text]
  • Willa Cather and American Arts Communities
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations, Theses, and Student Research: Department of English English, Department of 8-2004 At the Edge of the Circle: Willa Cather and American Arts Communities Andrew W. Jewell University of Nebraska - Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/englishdiss Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Jewell, Andrew W., "At the Edge of the Circle: Willa Cather and American Arts Communities" (2004). Dissertations, Theses, and Student Research: Department of English. 15. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/englishdiss/15 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the English, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Student Research: Department of English by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. AT THE EDGE OF THE CIRCLE: WILLA CATHER AND AMERICAN ARTS COMMUNITIES by Andrew W. Jewel1 A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Major: English Under the Supervision of Professor Susan J. Rosowski Lincoln, Nebraska August, 2004 DISSERTATION TITLE 1ather and Ameri.can Arts Communities Andrew W. Jewel 1 SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: Approved Date Susan J. Rosowski Typed Name f7 Signature Kenneth M. Price Typed Name Signature Susan Be1 asco Typed Name Typed Nnme -- Signature Typed Nnme Signature Typed Name GRADUATE COLLEGE AT THE EDGE OF THE CIRCLE: WILLA CATHER AND AMERICAN ARTS COMMUNITIES Andrew Wade Jewell, Ph.D. University of Nebraska, 2004 Adviser: Susan J.
    [Show full text]
  • Trusts for Purposes: Policy, Ambiguity, and Anomaly in the Uniform Laws
    Florida State University Law Review Volume 26 Issue 4 Article 6 1999 Trusts for Purposes: Policy, Ambiguity, and Anomaly in the Uniform Laws Adam J. Hirsch [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Adam J. Hirsch, Trusts for Purposes: Policy, Ambiguity, and Anomaly in the Uniform Laws, 26 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 913 (2017) . https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr/vol26/iss4/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida State University Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW TRUSTS FOR PURPOSES: POLICY, AMBIGUITY, AND ANOMALY IN THE UNIFORM LAWS Adam J. Hirsch VOLUME 26 SUMMER 1999 NUMBER 4 Recommended citation: Adam J. Hirsch, Trusts for Purposes: Policy, Ambiguity, and Anomaly in the Uniform Laws, 26 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. 913 (1999). TRUSTS FOR PURPOSES: POLICY, AMBIGUITY, AND ANOMALY IN THE UNIFORM LAWS* ADAM J. HIRSCH** I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 913 II. SCOPE AND EFFECTIVENESS .................................................................................. 915 III. PROCESS .................................................................................................................. 923 IV. DURATION OF TRUSTS ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How Unclaimed Property Laws Impact Funds in Your Preneed Trust
    BY WENDY RUSSELL WIENER We all recognize the benefit of general laws dealing with unclaimed property, which facilitate reuniting people with MISMATCHEDproperty they’ve lost track of – entirely M appropriate when the property is money in a bank account. But the op- eration of those laws on preneed trust funds is not entirely appropriate LAWS and can put trustees and licensees in an HOW UNCLAIMED impossible position. PROPERTY LAWS Let’s start by looking at the only two IMPACT FUNDS ways to fund a preneed contract. The first option is for the consumer to pay IN YOUR PRENEED the funeral home, which must then de- posit some or all of the money into trust. TRUST. The other option is for the consumer to purchase a life insurance policy; the same three circumstances – fulfillment, NOW THAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN IN death benefit payable under that policy cancellation or default. SOME STATES, THEY'VE GONE ABOUT is assigned to the funeral home so that Thus, the trust funds are locked up the firm will receive some or all of the by both law and contract, and they can IT INCORRECTLY, AMENDING ONLY money upon the death of the preneed only be accessed when one of the three GENERAL UNCLAIMED PROPERTY LAWS contract beneficiary. conditions occur. WHILE IGNORING SPECIFIC PRENEED Only one of these funding mecha- Few states include, within their pre- nisms – insurance – is exempt from the need laws, direction to the funeral TRUST LAWS. BY DOING SO, STATES reach of the unclaimed property laws home or trustee on how to handle pre- HAVE LITERALLY ENACTED LAWS THAT in some states.
    [Show full text]
  • 11Th Grade Summer Reading
    May 2021 Dear Incoming 11th Grade Student, With your summer vacation right around the corner, I know you are looking forward to having some time to rest, read a few good books, and enjoy the lovely weather. For this summer, you will read two books and complete an assignment for each book. Please take note that you must read the Required Reading book, but for your second book, you do have a choice of selected options as listed below. Book #1: Required Reading Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, Frederick Douglass ISBN-13 : 978-0451529947 Book #2: Reader’s Choice (choose one) Uncle Tom’s Cabin, Harriet Beecher Stowe any edition Of Mice and Men, John Steinbeck ISBN-13 : 978-0140177398 My Antonia, Willa Cather any edition The Good Earth, Pearl S. Buck any edition A Separate Peace, John Knowles ISBN-13 : 978-0743253970 Book Assignments For both books, you will complete a Dialectical Journal by logging your response and analysis as you read. Your Dialectical Journal should include 18 entries per book. Directions: 1. As you read, choose quotes or passages (Concrete Details) that stand out to you and use Google Docs or Microsoft Word to record them in the left-hand column of a T-chart, like the one below. Always include page numbers, or if you are reading a digital version, chapter numbers. 2. In the right column, write your commentary (1:2+) responding to that quote using one of the following codes: Journaling Codes ● (CH) Characterization – Analyze details or dialog the author gives you to build his/her characters.
    [Show full text]
  • Purpose Trusts As a Planning Tool for the 21St Century Thomas E
    University of South Dakota School of Law From the SelectedWorks of Thomas E. Simmons September 8, 2019 Purpose Trusts as a Planning Tool for the 21st Century Thomas E. Simmons Brad Myers Available at: https://works.bepress.com/tom_simmons/71/ Sunday Session III: Purpose Trusts as a Planning Tool for the 21st Century 1 – Myers & Simmons Purpose Trusts as a Planning Tool for the 21st Century Bradley Myers is the Associate Dean for Administration and the Randy H. Lee Professor at the University of North Dakota School of Law. He became a Fellow of the American College of Trust & Estate Counsel in 2017. Governor Hoeven named him one of North Dakota’ Commissioners to the Uniform Law Commission in 2007 and has served on several drafting committees for Uniform Acts in the Trusts & Estates area. Professor Myers joined faculty at the University of North Dakota in 2001 and teaches Federal Income Taxation, Business Entities Taxation Trusts and Estates, Estate Planning. Professor Myers formerly practiced law in the states of Nevada, California and Oregon, with his practice focused primarily in tax, business and estate planning with a special focus on the issues surrounding the development of low-income housing. Professor Myers received BS and MS degrees in Kinesiology from the University of California, Los Angeles. He then spent two years at the University of California, Davis, doing post-graduate research in avian respiratory control. Professor Myers received his J.D. from the University of Oregon. He served on the editorial staff of the Oregon Law Review and was elected to the Order of the Coif.
    [Show full text]
  • Imperfect Gifts As Declarations of Trust: Unapologetic Anomaly Sarajane Love Rutgers University-Camden
    Kentucky Law Journal Volume 67 | Issue 2 Article 3 1978 Imperfect Gifts as Declarations of Trust: Unapologetic Anomaly Sarajane Love Rutgers University-Camden Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj Part of the Estates and Trusts Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Love, Sarajane (1978) "Imperfect Gifts as eD clarations of Trust: Unapologetic Anomaly," Kentucky Law Journal: Vol. 67 : Iss. 2 , Article 3. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj/vol67/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Law Journal by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IMPERFECT GIFTS AS DECLARATIONS OF TRUST: AN UNAPOLOGETIC ANOMALY By SARAJANE LovE* One fundamental proposition is that, under a legal system recognizing the individualistic institution of private property and granting to the owner the power to determine his succes- sors in ownership, the general philosophy of the courts should favor giving effect to an intentional exercise of that power.' INTRODUCTION Ethel Yahuda was a widow who wished to give a library of Hebrew manuscripts collected by her and her late husband to the Hebrew University in Israel. She announced her gift at a public luncheon in Israel and upon her return to the United States began to catalogue and crate the collection for shipment to the university. Her intention to go forward with the gift was repeatedly expressed to friends and to the university.
    [Show full text]
  • Southampton Student Law Review 2014 Volume 4, Issue 1
    Southampton Student Law Review 2014 volume 4, issue 1 1 Southampton Student Law Review Southampton Law School Published in the United Kingdom By the Southampton Student Law Review Southampton Law School University of Southampton SO17 1BJ In affiliation with the University of Southampton, Southampton Law School All rights reserved. Copyright© 2014 University of Southampton. No part of this publication may be reproduced, transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, recording or otherwise, or stored in any retrieval system of any nature, without the prior, express written permission of the Southampton Student Law Review and the author, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed, in writing. The views expressed by the contributors are not necessarily those of the Editors of the Southampton Student Law Review. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the information contained in this journal is correct, the Editors do not accept any responsibility for any errors or omissions, or for any resulting consequences. © 2014 Southampton Student Law Review www.southampton.ac.uk/law/lawreview ISSN 2047 - 1017 This volume should be cited (2014) 4(1) S.S.L.R. Editorial Board 2014 Editors-in-Chief Elizabeth Herbert Ida Petretta Editorial Board Neil Brown Louise Cheung Dingjing (James) Huang Ebenezer Laryea Henry Pearce Viktor Weber Acknowledgements The Editors wish to thank our academic advisor Professor Oren Ben-Dor for his advice, commitment and support The Editors also wish to thank all members
    [Show full text]
  • “Garden-Magic”: Conceptions of Nature in Edith Wharton's Fiction
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 5-2021 “Garden-Magic”: Conceptions of Nature in Edith Wharton’s Fiction Jonathan Malks Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the American Art and Architecture Commons, American Literature Commons, Literature in English, North America Commons, Other Environmental Sciences Commons, Theory and Philosophy Commons, United States History Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Malks, Jonathan, "“Garden-Magic”: Conceptions of Nature in Edith Wharton’s Fiction" (2021). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 1603. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/1603 This Honors Thesis -- Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Malks 1 “Garden-Magic”: Conceptions of Nature in Edith Wharton’s Fiction A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in English from William & Mary by Jonathan M. Malks Accepted for Honors ________________________________________ Melanie V. Dawson, Thesis Advisor Elizabeth Barnes ________________________________________ Elizabeth Barnes, Exam Chair ________________________________________ Alan C. Braddock Francesca Sawaya ________________________________________ Francesca Sawaya Williamsburg, VA May 12, 2021 Malks 2 Land’s End It’s strangely balmy for November. I feel the heat and pluck a noxious red soda apple off of its brown and thorny stem. Many people here are bent on keeping “unwanteds” out, but these weeds grow ferally. They go without direction, and you can’t restrain them with a rusty, old “no photo” sign.
    [Show full text]
  • Uniform Trust Code Final Act with Comments
    UNIFORM TRUST CODE (Last Revised or Amended in 2010) Drafted by the NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMMISSIONERS ON UNIFORM STATE LAWS and by it APPROVED AND RECOMMENDED FOR ENACTMENT IN ALL THE STATES at its ANNUAL CONFERENCE MEETING IN ITS ONE-HUNDRED-AND-NINTH YEAR ST. AUGUSTINE, FLORIDA JULY 28 – AUGUST 4, 2000 WITH PREFATORY NOTE AND COMMENTS Copyright © 2000, 2010 By NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMMISSIONERS ON UNIFORM STATE LAWS April 10, 2020 1 ABOUT NCCUSL The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL), now in its 114th year, provides states with non-partisan, well-conceived and well-drafted legislation that brings clarity and stability to critical areas of state statutory law. Conference members must be lawyers, qualified to practice law. They are practicing lawyers, judges, legislators and legislative staff and law professors, who have been appointed by state governments as well as the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands to research, draft and promote enactment of uniform state laws in areas of state law where uniformity is desirable and practical. $ NCCUSL strengthens the federal system by providing rules and procedures that are consistent from state to state but that also reflect the diverse experience of the states. $ NCCUSL statutes are representative of state experience, because the organization is made up of representatives from each state, appointed by state government. $ NCCUSL keeps state law up-to-date by addressing important and timely legal issues. $ NCCUSL’s efforts reduce the need for individuals and businesses to deal with different laws as they move and do business in different states.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early Autumn Edition of Trust Espeaking. Inside We Have What We Hope Are Interesting and Useful Articles. Trusts
    ISSUE 16 | AUTUMN 2013 GREG KELLY LAW LIMITED Level 6 Change House, 150 Featherston Street, Wellington | PO Box 25-243, Panama St, Wellington 6146, New Zealand Ph: 04 498-8500 | Fax: 04 499-5193 | E-mail: [email protected] | www.trustlaw.co.nz Welcome to the early Autumn edition of Trust eSpeaking. Inside we have what we hope are interesting and useful articles. If you would like to talk further about any of the material in this newsletter, or about trusts in general, then please don’t hesitate to contact us. Inside: Trusts and Avoidance of Rest Home Fees All quite tricky It was very common in the 1990s for New Zealanders to set up discretionary family trusts in the hope that by putting assets in the name of a trust, they could qualify for rest home subsidies in the event that they were required to go into rest home care. This certainly worked for a number of years. Things have changed, however, and this article looks at a recent case that challenged that proposition… CONTINUE READING Right to Decide About Funeral and Burial Still some uncertainties Arguments over where the late Mr James Takamore should be buried have led to a long-running legal dispute. Now the Supreme Court has spoken, but its decision in Takamore v Clarke leaves some questions unanswered… CONTINUE READING Law Commission’s Key Proposals for New Trusts Legislation Whilst the Law Commission is reviewing trust law, we’ve undertaken to keep you up-to-date with its recommendations; which is much easier than you having to read the 300+ pages of the Commission’s report… CONTINUE READING If you do not want to receive this newsletter, please unsubscribe.
    [Show full text]