Mid-20Th Century Modern Schools in Eugene, Oregon 1945-1968

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mid-20Th Century Modern Schools in Eugene, Oregon 1945-1968 Flexible Space, Supple Minds: th Mid-20 Century Modern Schools in Eugene, Oregon 1945-1968 Winston S. Churchill High School Source: Eugene School District No. 4. “Eugene Project Records, 1959-1977.” Eugene, OR: University of Oregon, Special Collections, Manuscripts and Archives, Box 163. Morgan Albertson and Hayli Ballentine University of Oregon AAAP511: Introduction to Historic Preservation December 7, 2015 Eugene Mid-20th Century Modern School Context 1 Table of Contents Part 1: Introduction Part 2: Mid-20th Century Progressive Education and Design – The Evolution of American School Architecture Part 3: Eugene, Oregon School System Part 4: Overview of Mid-20th Century Modern Schools Architectural Styles & Details Eugene, Oregon Part 5: Eugene, Oregon School Architects Part 6: Location and History of Remaining Mid-20th Century Schools in Eugene, Oregon Part 7: Relevant Questions and Reflections Part 8: Conclusion Appendices Bibliography Eugene Mid-20th Century Modern School Context 2 1. Introduction A historic context is a strategic planning document used to help identify and evaluate a community’s historic resources within a broader historical framework. The following paper serves as the “historical background” for the Eugene Mid-20th Century Modern School Facilities Historical Context. This portion of the context focuses on the historical trends, events, and developments that influenced how and why schools were built from 1945-1968 in Eugene, Oregon. During this time period, school construction and facility expansion were dictated by changing demographics, education reform, new construction methods, and new building standards. Historical revival styles were rejected and instead schools were designed to accommodate new reforms sweeping the education system; form followed function. The history and construction of each school in Eugene from 1945 to 1968 is briefly discussed in this document to provide guidance for evaluating and protecting these potentially significant historic resources in the future. 2. Mid-20th Century Progressive Education and Design - The Evolution of American School Architecture Public education in the United States has typically developed in response to larger, national historical patterns. These changing school trends are often then reflected in school building architecture. Over the last two centuries, this relationship between public school reform, architectural innovation, and public school design has greatly influenced the evolution of simple, single room schoolhouses to complex, thoughtful campuses. The modernization of school Eugene Mid-20th Century Modern School Context 3 buildings has consistently been used to advance public education as school improvement campaigns were also typically associated with improved teacher training and curriculum reform. Modern education began in the U.S. in the 19th century with the emergence of the “graded school,” where students of similar age were grouped together and taught at different levels. 1 Before 1900, early American education took place in small, rural non-descript one-room schoolhouses or urban factory-like schoolhouses, where the fundamental teaching strategy was strict recitation and textbook learning. School architecture was uniform and straightforward, not much thought was put into creating suitable learning environments. It wasn’t until the second half of the 19th century that education received regular government funding and political support, which led to greater importance placed on school design and appropriate facilities. 2 At this time, architecture was influenced by public funding, urbanization, modernization, and the health movement.3 By the turn of the 20th century, an education reform movement had developed in reaction to disorganized programs, unhealthy facilities, and a growing population. The proponents for progressive education argued that public schools should provide "education for life" by focusing on the individualism of students and the changing expectations of well-rounded students in the modern world.4 Traditional academic subjects such as language, mathematics, history, and science were augmented with physical education, health education, and vocational education. New, larger school buildings were constructed to accommodate increasing student enrollment and the diversified curriculum. For the first time, these new schools included gymnasiums, 1 Gislason, Neil, “Building Paradigms: Major Transformations in School Architecture (1798-2009),” The Alberta 2 Ibid, 235. 3 Ibid, 238. 4 Weisser, Amy, ““Little Red School House, What Now?”: Two Centuries of American Public School Architecture,” Journal of Planning History, vol. 5, no. 3 (2006): 200; Cremin, Lawrence A., The Transformation of the School: Progressivism in American education, 1876-1957 (New York: Random House, Inc., 1961), 259. Eugene Mid-20th Century Modern School Context 4 auditoriums, cafeterias, locker rooms, clinics, laboratories, and workshops; plus they had improved lighting, ventilation, safety, and sanitation.5 The exterior facades typically exhibited historical styles such as Greek Revival, Romanesque, and Gothic Revival. At this time, great emphasis was placed on elaborate school architecture to make education more attractive and appealing to the general public.6 Schools were increasingly thought of as "civic monuments" to demonstrate the country's dedication and investment in children and education.7 The progressive education movement established the importance of school architecture and its ability to convey the value and purpose of public education, a trend that would continue well into the 20th century. Progressive techniques continued to be regularly adopted in the 1920s and 1930s. After World War I, growing centralization of the school system resulted in the consolidation of school districts and increasing standardization of public education.8 By 1931, there were 127,531 school districts in the country, however, a survey of school architecture revealed the inadequacy of school facilities where convoluted school layouts and small classrooms were not conducive to new teaching techniques. 9 Educational reformists, such as John Dewey and Richard Neutra, began advocating for schools to foster greater communication, curiosity, and creativity.10 Progressive education and flexible learning environments were gaining popularity and becoming more widely accepted. Architects and school administrations began questioning whether rigid, classical revival school buildings could inspire children and prepare them for the future or if modernism would be more effective and encouraging of the new ideas. 5 Weisser, ““Little Red School House, What Now?”: Two Centuries of American Public School Architecture,” 200. 6 Ibid, 203. 7 Ibid, 200. 8 Cremin, Lawrence A., The Transformation of the School: Progressivism in American education, 1876-1957 (New York: Random House, Inc., 1961), 274. 9 Weisser, ““Little Red School House, What Now?”: Two Centuries of American Public School Architecture,” 207. 10 Ibid, 201. Eugene Mid-20th Century Modern School Context 5 Despite the new energy and effort put into school reform, there were many existing obstacles to overcome in order to implement this new “ideal school.” A National Education Association survey from 1935 showed that 687,611 students were attending school in condemned buildings and many others were only attending school part-time because of the lack of school facilities in their communities.11 However, despite the pressing need for new school construction and maintenance, very little building work was completed during the years of the Depression and World War II. The few schools that were built during this time explored how to apply modernism to school buildings. The Crow Island School in Winnetka, Illinois was designed by Larry Perkins and built in 1941. It was organized into a central administration and assembly hub which then was surrounded by extending classroom wings, classrooms were L- shaped to accommodate academic and non-academic learning, and all classrooms had access to the outside.12 The Heathcote Elementary School in Scarsdale, New York was built in 1941 and had a similar layout to the Crow Island School but was designed with considerable community input, as well as collaboration between the architects and teachers.13 While rare, experimental examples, these designs and architectural theory would influence the next 30 years of school design and construction. Following World War II, the U.S. experienced a population boom and fear of the “communist threat” was growing. 14 Public school enrollment increased across the country, and schools were suddenly forced to accommodate numbers of new students they had never seen before. In addition, public education garnered national significance because it was viewed as a 11 Weisser, ““Little Red School House, What Now?”: Two Centuries of American Public School Architecture,” 207. 12 Ibid., 209. 13 Ibid, 212. 14 Ogata, Amy F., “Building for Learning in Postwar American Elementary Schools,” Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, vol. 67, no. 4 (December 2008): 562. Eugene Mid-20th Century Modern School Context 6 tool to improve society and combat global competitors. The country immediately sprung into action and in 1950 spent $1,133,00,000 on educational facilities.15 Most of this school growth took place in suburban areas, which were experiencing a massive influx of new residents. Previously, most educational standards were often set in urban schools, however at
Recommended publications
  • Post-Gazette
    VOL. 125 - NO. 15 BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS, APRIL 9, 2021 $.35 A COPY Public Meeting for the North End Residents Oppose Cross Street Hotel by Marie Simboli Silver Line Extension The North End community and its residents have mounted stiff opposition to a boutique luxury hotel planned for the property on the Alternatives Analysis Greenway-end of Salem Street. Since this project was fi rst proposed, residents have been saying that it is out of character with the neighborhood and many of their complaints are focused on its disruptive impact on the quality of life. Community stakeholders have organized a signature drive and have voiced opposition and it doesn’t appear that neighbors plan to go away, as they continue their message of “enough is enough” 134 key boutique hotel with 2 ground fl oors universal that North End residents DO NOT uses and seasonal roof top dining 300 people a WANT A HOTEL LOCATED THERE. 5-story building. Comments by business owner Dr. Paul M. 1. Blocking the view of greenway that has a Cangiano of Vision North: beautiful view with trees, grass and water sprin- “The North End needs every parking space it klers and residents enjoying that part of the park. can get its hands on. This proposed project is going to take public temporary/North End over- The MBTA and MassDOT project team will present an overview Residents will have no sunlight and no quality night parking spaces for its own benefi t. I have of the Silver Line Extension (SLX) Alternatives Analysis, share the of fresh air patients that use these spots daily to run into my fi ndings so far, and gather input from the community at a virtual 2.
    [Show full text]
  • North Eugene High School
    Spotlight on Success: North Eugene High School “We’re experiencing more ownership of the school and more personalization. Hopefully [we’re] changing the climate so that the kids realize this school belongs 1 to them and their parents and their community.” North Eugene High School (NEHS) is one of four comprehensive high schools in the Eugene (OR) School District 4J, with additional magnet and alternative schools available to Eugene students. There are just under 1000 students at NEHS. Laurie Henry is the campus principal and works with each of the three small school principals; she is finishing her second year at NEHS. Laurie has been an educator with the Eugene School District 4J for 33 years, first as an elementary teacher and learning specialist. She was later an administrator at the elementary, middle, and high school levels. A lot of Laurie Henry’s background involved work with at-risk and low income students. She sees herself as an instructional leader because she believes one of her strengths is around instruction. She said, “It’s really exciting to have teachers coming to learn how to differentiate learning rather than just teaching content and hoping the kids get it.” What’s working? Key Components to Success Small Learning Communities North Eugene High School is in their second year of housing three small schools within one larger school. E3:OSSI (Oregon Small Schools Initiative), funded by the Meyer Memorial Trust and the Gates Foundation, provided initial funding to convert the comprehensive high school to the small schools model. There are three small learning communities of approximately 70-100 students.
    [Show full text]
  • North Eugene High School
    North Eugene High School “Home of the Highlanders” Welcome to North Eugene High School! We are committed to providing our students with a rich, challenging, and meaningful educational experience. North Eugene High School offers a unique academic program that provides every student the opportunity to excel. Our caring staff is committed to helping every student fulfill their potential. We know that participation in activities outside of the classroom contributes to student engagement and academic achievement. Our goal is to promote academic achievement and engagement for all students at North. At North, we believe one of the best ways to learn is by doing. Our vision includes robust Career and Technical Education (CTE) Programs of Study, in which students can complete a pathway of courses, explore career interests, and exit NEHS prepared for high demand jobs. Our state-approved CTE programs include Digital Media, Early Childhood Education, Health Occupations, and more. In addition to all of these learning opportunities, we offer International Baccalaureate, Japanese and Spanish Immersion, Culinary Arts, and more. In short, there is something for everyone at North! This planning guide provides a menu of all the exciting courses designed to meet the varied interests and needs of our diverse community of learners. It is an essential tool in making the important educational decisions that lie ahead. We endeavor to offer a breadth of elective courses, while ensuring a variety of academic courses required for graduation. As you look through
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Ford Scholars ‐ Sorted by State, City and Last Name (14 from Siskiyou County, California and 110 from Oregon)
    2018 Ford Scholars ‐ Sorted by State, City and Last Name (14 from Siskiyou County, California and 110 from Oregon) Home College Planning on Attending # Home City Last Name First Name High School or Community College St 2018‐19 1 CA Etna Cruz‐Navarro Jorge Sonoma State University Etna High School 2 CA Etna Ireson‐Janke Anya University of California Los Angeles Yreka High School 3 CA Etna Morrill Caleb University of California Davis Etna High School 4 CA Fort Jones Watton Dakota Sonoma State University Etna High School 5 CA Happy Camp Barnett Brittany Southern Oregon University Happy Camp High School 6 CA Happy Camp Offield Madison University of California Los Angeles Happy Camp High School 7 CA Hornbrook Bortolussi Amiee California State University Chico Yreka High School 8 CA Mount Shasta Berg Clayton California State University Northridge Mt Shasta High School 9 CA Mount Shasta Carter Violet University of California Berkeley Weed High School 10 CA Tulelake Gonzalez‐Zuniga Gabriela California State University Chico Tulelake High School 11 CA Tulelake Weaver Cambria University of California Santa Cruz Tulelake High School 12 CA Weed Arnett Victoria Humboldt State University Weed High School 13 CA Yreka Mao Anni University of California Berkeley Yreka High School 14 CA Yreka Williams OliviaRose Humboldt State University Yreka High School 15 OR Ashland Diab Jack Southern Oregon University Ashland High School 16 OR Ashland Gottschalk Aspyn Oregon State University Ashland High School 17 OR Ashland Safay Gabriela Oregon State University Logos
    [Show full text]
  • 0131-PT-A Section.Indd
    Team founder YOUR ONLINE LOCAL Harry Glickman New world view TRAIL BLAZER refl ects on his DAILY NEWS Portland International Film NBA career Festival adds a little love www.portlandtribune.com PortlandSee SPORTS, B8 Tribune— See LIFE, B1 THURSDAY, JANUARY 31, 2013 • TWICE CHOSEN THE NATION’S BEST NONDAILY PAPER • PUBLISHED THURSDAY Cluster ■ Developments on Columbia River levee now deemed safety concerns plan ties parents in knots Many worry changes would water down Chief Joseph success By JENNIFER ANDERSON The Tribune The story time rug in Er- in Quinton’s classroom isn’t big enough to hold all of her students. Some of her 31 second-grad- ers spill onto the bare fl oor or sit in desk chairs behind the group. That’s about six or seven more than what Quinton — a teacher of six years at North Portland’s Chief Joseph Elemen- tary School — considers ideal. “So much is behavior man- agement,” says Quinton, whose teaching career began in Cali- otorists, bicyclists and jog- towers and miles of utility lines. fornia about 30 years ago. With gers enjoying Columbia “Everything’s changed since Ka- 31 students, River views along Marine trina,” says Dave Hendricks, director “we don’t have MDrive may not realize it, of special projects for Multnomah the materials; Levee holds but they’re traveling atop a mound of County Drainage District No. 1. “We want we don’t have sand that’s the main bulwark against “All this stuff is no longer accept- to be part the time. ... I massive fl ooding of North and North- able,” he says, unless engineers can of the don’t dive into east Portland.
    [Show full text]
  • Lane County Voters Pamphlet
    LANE COUNTY VOTERS’ LANE COUNTY VOTERS’ LANEPAM COUNTYPHLET PAMPH LET VOTERS’MAY 19, 2015 SPECIALPAMPHLET ELECTION MAY 19, 2015 SPECIAL ELECTION MAY 21, 2019 SPECIAL ELECTION The publication and distribution of this pamphlet is provided by Thethe publicationCounty Clerk and at distributionthe direction of ofthis the pamphlet County Commissioners.is provided by theThe County candidate Clerk and at themeasure direction information of the County was provided Commissioners. by Thecandidates, candidate special and measure districts, information and other interested was provided parties by that candidates,chose to participate special districts, in this portion and other of the interested election partiesprocess. that chose to participate in this portion of the election process. Your ballot will contain only those measures and candidates Yourwhich ballot you willare containeligible onlyto vote those on, measuresbased on whereand candidates you live. which you are eligible to vote on, based on where you live. Table of Contents Community College Candidate Statements: Lane Community College .........................................................................................................................20-3 Education Service District Candidate Statements: Lane Education Service District ................................................................................................................20-5 School District Candidate Statements: Bethel School District #52.........................................................................................................................20-6
    [Show full text]
  • Duck Men's Basketball
    ATHLETIC COMMUNICATIONS (MBB) Greg Walker [email protected] O: 541-346-2252 C: 541-954-8775 Len Casanova Center | 2727 Leo Harris Parkway | @OregonMBB | Facebook.com/OregonMBB | GoDucks.com 2020-21 SCHEDULE DUCK MEN’S BASKETBALL NOVEMBER RESULT SCORE No. 21 OREGON (1-1) vs. EASTERN WASHINGTON (0-2) 25 Eastern Washington PPD PPD Date Monday, December 7, 2020 DECEMBER TIME TV Tip Time 4:06 p.m. PT Site / Stadium / Capacity Eugene, Ore. / Matthew Knight Arena / 12,364 1 2 vs. Missouri L 75-83 Television Pac-12 Network 4 vs. Seton Hall 1 W 83-70 Ann Schatz, play-by-play; Elise Woodward, analyst Radio Oregon Sports Network (95.3 FM KUJZ in Eugene/Springfi eld) 7 Eastern Washington 4:00 PM Pac-12 Net Joey McMurry, play-by-play; Jerry Allen, analyst 9 Florida A&M 8:00 PM Pac-12 Net Live Stats GoDucks.com 12 at Washington * 5:00 PM Pac-12 Net Live Audio GoDucks.com Twitter @OregonMBB 23 UCLA * 12:00 PM ESPN2 Internet tunein.com 31 California * TBA TBA Satellite Radio Sirius ch. 135 / XM ch. 197 / Internet 957 JANUARY TIME TV SERIES HISTORY 2 Stanford * TBA TBA All-Time Oregon leads, 3-0 Last Meeting Oregon 81, Eastern Washington 47, Nov. 9, 2018 (Eugene, Ore.) 7 at Colorado * TBA TBA Current Streak Ducks +3 10 at Utah * TBA TBA Last UO Win Oregon 81, Eastern Washington 47, Nov. 9, 2018 (Eugene, Ore.) Last EWU Win NA 14 Arizona State * TBA TBA 16 Arizona * TBA TBA 23 Oregon State * TBA TBA THE STARTING 5 28 at UCLA * TBA TBA A pair of defending conference champions, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Lane Community College Foundation 2015 ANNUAL REPORT
    Lane Community College Foundation 2015 ANNUAL REPORT INVEST IN LANE. INVEST IN SUCCESS. For many of our students, Lane is their only safe space and our faculty, staff, students, and donors become their family. This “family” is real and critical to their success. MARY SPILDE, LANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE PRESIDENT A Letter from the President amily is an integral part of Lane Community College. Siblings, Fparents, children, cousins, and other relatives share the experience of a Lane education. I have met students who are the second, or even the third generation in their family to attend Lane, and others who are the first in their family to go to college. I know older adults inspired to complete their education because of their child’s experience here. When families embrace higher education together, the chances of success are much greater. For many of our students, Lane is their only safe space and our faculty, staff, students, and donors become their family. This “family” is real and critical to their success. Whether it’s a cohort of students in our Women’s Program, a staff member in the Veterans Center, a mentor in our Multicultural Center, an inspirational teacher, or a generous scholarship donor, students can find encouragement, assistance, and people who truly care about them. Just a few short months ago, our campus family came together to celebrate the grand opening of our renovated campus core. This transformative project included our library, tutoring center, quiet study space, and food services, as well as our well-known culinary student restaurant, the Renaissance Room.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Board of Directors School District No
    MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 4J, LANE COUNTY, OREGON December 7, 2005 Meeting Convened The Board of Directors of School District No. 4J, Lane County, Eugene, Oregon, held a regular meeting on December 7, 2005, at 7 p.m., at the Education Center, 200 North Monroe Street, Eugene, Oregon. Notice of the meeting was mailed to the media and posted in Education Center on December 2, 2005, and published in The Register-Guard on December 5, 2005. ROLL CALL BOARD MEMBERS: Beth Gerot, Chair Tom Herrmann, Vice-Chair Eric Forrest Charles Martinez, Jr. Craig Smith Virginia Thompson STAFF: Barbara Bellamy, Director, Communications and Intergovernmental Relations Ted Heid, Director of Labor Relations Tom Henry, Deputy Superintendent and Chief Academic Officer Hillary Kittleson, Director of Financial Services Susan Fahey, Operations and Reporting Manager Caroline Passerotti, Financial Analyst STUDENT REPRESENTATIVES: Katie Parker, Churchill High School Jordan Ries, North Eugene High School MEDIA: Anne Williams, The Register-Guard KEZI News CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL, AND FLAG SALUTE Board Chair Beth Gerot called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. and led the salute to the flag. She noted that Board Member Anette Spickard and Superintendent George Russell would not be present at the meeting. Deputy Superintendent Tom Henry would be filling in for Superintendent Russell. INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS AND SUPERINTENDENT’S REPORT Mr. Henry introduced the following guests who would be speaking to the first item of information of the agenda: Mike Garling, temporary principal at Edgewood/Evergreen School, Marily Walker, a teacher at Evergreen, Julie Hulme, a teacher at Edgewood, Laura Blake Jones, a parent at Evergreen, and Kris Shaughnessy, a parent at Edgewood.
    [Show full text]
  • Theodore Roosevelt Junior High School Eugene, Oregon 1949–2016
    THEODORE ROOSEVELT JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL EUGENE, OREGON 1949–2016 Liz Carter HERITAGE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES REPORT NO. 412 THEODORE ROOSEVELT JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, EUGENE, OREGON, 1949–2016 by Liz Carter Prepared for Eugene School District 4J Eugene, Oregon Heritage Research Associates, Inc., 1997 Garden Avenue Eugene, Oregon 97405 March 2016 Heritage Research Associates Report No. 412 ABSTRACT The 1949–1950 International Style Roosevelt Junior High (Middle) School, in Eugene, Lane County, Oregon, was designed by Portland architects Wolff and Phillips. Built to its current configuration over a period of years, it replaced the 1924 Roosevelt Junior High, which was converted to Condon Elementary School in 1953 and is now owned by the University of Oregon, known as Agate Hall. The subject school is representative of the community’s response to post-World War II population growth as well as the changing architectural trends of the mid-twentieth century. As evaluated under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, Roosevelt Middle School was found to be historically significant for its association with post-World War II educational shifts and trends, and for its architectural character as a good local example of the International Style, which came into common use in the years following the war. Although not the first post-war school constructed in Eugene—it was preceded by Colin Kelly Junior High—and certainly not the last to be built in response to the Baby Boom, Roosevelt became a lauded focal point of new, progressive pedagogical approaches, and the building reflected those ideas architecturally. The original portion of the new school building was constructed in 1949–1950, with historic-period additions made between 1950 and 1957 (in 1950, 1951, 1954, 1955, and 1957).
    [Show full text]
  • Highlander Parents and Students
    North Eugene High School Academic Planning Guide 2017-18 NEHS Academic Planning Guide Page 1 Table of Contents Graduation Requirements………………………………..………………………………………..…………… 3 College Credit at North Eugene…………………………….………………………………….……………… 6 RTEC………………………………………………….………………………………………..…...…………… 8 Career Skills………………………………………………………….…………………………………..……… 9 Academic Recognition…………….…………………………………….……………………………………… 10 Applied & Fine Arts………………………………….………………………..………………………………… 11 Art / Graphic / Digital……………………………………………………..……………………………… 12 Drama …..……………………………………………………………………...………………………… 14 Music………………………………………………………..………………………………………….. 15 Industrial Education………………………………………….………………………………………… 17 Family & Consumer Sciences………………………………………………………………………………… 18 Early Childhood Education……………………………………………………………………………… 18 Culinary ……..…………………………………………………………………………………………… 19 Health & PE ………..…………………………………………………………………………………………… 20 Language Arts…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 22 Mathematics…………………………..………………………………………………………………………… 24 Other Subjects………………………………..………………………………………………………………… 27 Computer Science………………………………………………………………………………………. 27 Science………………………………………………………..………………………………………………… 30 Social Studies………………………………………………………..………………………………………… 33 World Languages……………………………………………………….……………………………………… 35 American Sign Language ……………………………………………………………………………… 35 Japanese ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 36 Spanish ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 36 Support Services……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 38 Special Education……………………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Transformational Leadership: Profile of a High School Principal. INSTITUTION Oregon School Study Council, Eugene
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 359 652 EA 025 093 AUTHOR Liontos, Lynn Balster TITLE Transformational Leadership: Profile of a High School Principal. INSTITUTION Oregon School Study Council, Eugene. REPORT NO ISSN-0095-6694 PUB DATE Jul 93 NOTE 65p. AVAILABLE FROMPublication Sales, Oregon School Study Council, University of Oregon, 1787 Agate Street, Eugene, OR 97403 ($7 prepaid, nonmember; $4.50 prepaid, member; $3 postage and handling on billed orders). PUB TYPE Guides Non-Classroom Use (055) Historical Materials (060) JOURNAL CIT OSSC Bulletin; v36 n9 Jul 1993 EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Administrator Characteristics; *Administrator Effectiveness; Biographies; Change Agents; Educational Improvement; High Schools; *Leadership Styles; Participative Decision Making; Personality Traits; *Principals; School Restructuring; *Teamwork IDENTIFIERS Caring; Empowerment; *Eugene Public Schools OR: Facilitator Styles; *Transformational Leadership ABSTRACT Drawing on extensive staff interviews, this publication profiles a high school principal in Eugene, Oregon, who exhibits many aspects of transformational leadership. Transformational leadership is improvement oriented and comprises three elements: (1) a collaborative, shared decision-making approach; (2) an emphasis on teacher professionalism and empowerment; and (3) an understanding of change, including how to encouragechange in others. Bob Anderson is principal at North Eugene High School, which has evolved into an outstanding, innovative school under his leadership. Chapter 1 tells how Anderson entered the administration field and describes his personality. Chapter 2, devoted to Anderson's first years at North Eugene, traces his evolution as a transformational leader and describes how he set the stage for risk-taking, growth, and change. Chapters 3 through 7 focus on five key aspects of transformational leadership: working in teams, seeing the big picture, empowering others, creating ownership, and continually improving the school.
    [Show full text]