Chester Arthur Redemption

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chester Arthur Redemption Chester Arthur Redemption EPISODE TRANSCRIPT Listen to Presidential at http://wapo.st/presidential This transcript was run through an automated transcription service and then lightly edited for clarity. There may be typos or small discrepancies from the podcast audio. LILLIAN CUNNINGHAM: There are 3 million civil servants who work for the U.S. government today. Many take entrance exams. They have standardized pay scales. They work in the State Department or the Department of Energy or the Department of Homeland Security, regardless of which president or which political party is in office. Well, this definitely hasn't always been the case. For the first 100-plus years of the country's beginning, government jobs were basically handed out as political favors to people who, in many cases, had absolutely no qualifications or relevant experience. It was a system just rife with corruption and patronage. So, for this episode, we're going to explore the moment in American history when that transformed, or reformed, under President Chester Arthur. Now I've got someone here who dove into the research for this episode with me -- my colleague David Fahrenthold, who's a politics reporter at The Post and who did an incredible series of stories investigating government waste. DAVID FAHRENTHOLD: Thank you. LILLIAN CUNNINGHAM: Chester Arthur. Thanks for volunteering for this. DAVID FAHRENTHOLD: The most obscure of all. LILLIAN CUNNINGHAM: Well, so if anyone knows Chester Arthur today, it's probably as the namesake of a fictional elementary school that appeared in the 1995 "Die Hard With A Vengeance" movie, as many of our podcast listeners have pointed out to me. In all seriousness though, David, I think you and I both went into this episode thinking that, because Chester Arthur is so obscure and because the main thing that happened on his watch was civil service reform, that this was maybe going to be kind of a dry, dense story -- and we were so wrong. We were so wrong. Presidential podcast wapo.st/presidential 1 Chester Arthur has one of the most amazing stories that I think we've heard yet in our study of the American presidency. He was the son of a Baptist minister. Then, he sinks to the very sort of underbelly of New York City Gilded Age machine politics. He holds the most lucrative patronage job in the country as the collector of the Port of New York, and then, at the very moment that Chester Arthur inherits the presidency and seems ready to just plunge the government into even deeper corruption, something magical and strange and completely unexpected happens: He goes from being exhibit A of corrupt machine politics to being the person who actually reforms and cleans up the system. DAVID FAHRENTHOLD: So, all it took for Arthur to make that kind of redemptive arc was the death of a president and a set of mysterious letters from a woman that Arthur had never met, as we'll learn more about. LILLIAN CUNNINGHAM: So, here is the story of Chester Arthur. I'm Lillian Cunningham with The Washington Post. DAVID FAHRENTHOLD: I'm David Fahrenthold. LILLIAN CUNNINGHAM: And this is the 21st episode of “Presidential.” PRESIDENTIAL THEME MUSIC LILLIAN CUNNINGHAM: Alright, so the very basics are that Arthur was born in Fairfield, Vermont in 1829, and he was one of eight children. His father was a Baptist preacher who kept getting kicked out of parishes because he was such a fervent abolitionist, and so the family was constantly packing up and moving from town to town throughout Vermont and then throughout New York. And this kind of turned Arthur off from religion, but it didn't turn him off from advocating for African-American rights. After Arthur went to Union College, he moved to New York City and he worked in a prominent law firm where one of the cases that he really gained a lot of attention for was that he defended Elizabeth Jennings, who was a black woman who sat in the white section of a Brooklyn street car. DAVID FAHRENTHOLD: This was more than a hundred years before Rosa Parks, and his victory in that case was something that was celebrated in New York for many years afterward. It's forgotten now, but it was a big deal at the time. LILLIAN CUNNINGHAM: Yeah, this was the landmark case that ended up desegregating all of the trains and streetcars in New York City. DAVID FAHRENTHOLD: Well then, during the Civil War, Arthur was a quartermaster general in New York, which means that he basically handled all logistics of feeding, clothing, arming a lot of the troops in New York state. LILLIAN CUNNINGHAM: A lot of administrative detail. Sort of an early exercise of his bureaucratic [skills]. DAVID FAHRENTHOLD: Right, the glories of bureaucracy. He was good at it, even early on. Presidential podcast wapo.st/presidential 2 LILLIAN CUNNINGHAM: So, looking at this early story of Arthur, he actually seems pretty idealistic and principled. But during this time, he does seem to show also an increasingly persistent desire to gain money, to gain power. And this is sort of what brings him into working for big wigs in the Republican Party of New York at the time. And this is where we're going to turn to Michelle Krowl at the Library of Congress, who's going to paint a better picture for us of the personality of Chester Arthur. LILLIAN CUNNINGHAM: I'll ask you just my classic blind date question, which -- it's very interesting to see -- some listeners love the question and write to tell me how they love it, and other ones have certainly written to me to say that they think I should get rid of it. But you gave me the impression that you would have a very interesting answer to it, so I'm going to ask you what it would be like to go on a blind date with Chester Arthur -- beyond just how you feel about mutton chops. MICHELLE KROWL: Well, and actually, because of the question that you ask, I can't tell you how often I've been thinking about dating these presidents, which I had never thought of before. But Chester Arthur -- and it actually does play into his political career, so it's a legitimate question -- Chester Arthur would be a fantastic blind date. He would be a lousy husband, but he would be a fantastic blind date. And the reasons are -- and some of this sounds very superficial, I do understand -- but one thing, particularly when he was younger man, he was very handsome. I mean, I kind of like the mutton chops. Not that I would want to see them come back as a fad. But, as a younger man, Arthur had very dark, dark eyes and he was tall and a sturdy person. I mean, many people, if they even know who Chester Arthur is anymore or have an idea of what he looks like, [have an image of him from] later in life when he's got the mutton chops and he's sort of a larger man. But as a young man, he really is quite handsome, and he dresses well. He really likes the finer things in life. He likes to eat well, and he likes to dress well, and he likes his house to be nicely furnished. And he was somebody who liked to please people. He liked to get along with everybody. He wasn't radical in any way on that sense. So, he would he would be a very good person to court, you know. He would probably take you to a nice meal at Delmonico's and he would show up in a beautifully tailored suit, and he would have pleasing conversation. Everybody liked him. And so, that would all be fantastic. The reason he would be a lousy husband, or a less devoted husband or attentive husband -- and this is exactly what happened with his own wife – is, in his public career, he does all those those things I just talked about. He is a party operative. That is who Chester Arthur is. When he gets into the Republican Party, he is a party man. Not in the ‘woo hoo’ kind of party sense, but in the political party sense, which means he's at the Republican headquarters all the time and he's out with the people that he needs to wine and dine all the time. And so, he did love his wife Ellen, but he spent so much time being a good party man that he wasn't home. Particularly when he's collector of the Port of New York, that's part of what you Presidential podcast wapo.st/presidential 3 need to do when you're a political operative is to know who your constituency is, make them happy, be the person that gets along with everybody, and be good at it. And he was. So, the very qualities that would make him a really fantastic blind date make him a really fantastic political operative, which means he's never home to be a good husband. LILLIAN CUNNINGHAM: So, we heard a bit last week in the Garfield episode about how Arthur was the right-hand man to the New York senator and Republican Party boss Roscoe Conkling. So, what was their relationship like? MICHELLE KROWL: Conkling is a peacock. He's flamboyant and he's a good orator and he likes to be the center of attention. He's somebody that you notice.
Recommended publications
  • The Crimson Permanent Assurance Rotten Tomatoes
    The Crimson Permanent Assurance Rotten Tomatoes Mace brabbles his lychees cognise dubiously, but unfair Averil never gudgeons so likely. Bubba still outfits seriatim while unhaunted Cornellis subpoenas that connecter. Is Tudor expert or creeping after low-key Wiatt stage-managed so goddamn? Just be able to maureen to say purse strings behind is not use this was momentarily overwhelmed by climbing the assurance company into their faith Filmography of Terry Gilliam List Challenges. 5 Worst Movies About King Arthur According To Rotten Tomatoes. From cult to comedy classics streaming this week TechHive. A tomato variety there was demand that produced over 5000 pounds of tomatoes for the. Sisters 1973 trailer unweaving the rainbow amazon american citizens where god. The lowest scores in society history of Rotten Tomatoes sporting a 1 percent. 0 1 The average Permanent Assurance 16 min NA Adventure Short. Mortal Engines Amazonsg Movies & TV Shows. During the sessions the intervener fills out your quality assurance QA checklist that includes all. The cast Permanent Assurance is mandatory on style and delicate you. Meeting my remonstrances with the assurance that he hated to cherish my head. Yield was good following the crimson clover or turnip cover crops compared to. Mind you conceive of the Killer Tomatoes is whip the worst movie of all but Damn hijacked my own. Script helps the stack hold have a 96 fresh rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Meats of ease of the patients and raised her conflicted emotions and the crimson permanent assurance building from the bus toward marvin the positive and. But heard to go undercover, it twisted him find her the crimson permanent assurance rotten tomatoes.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Music with ARTHUR!
    © 2 0 Making Music 0 4 M a r c B r o w n . A l l R ig h ts R e s e r ve d . with ARTHUR! Look inside ARTHUR is produced by for easy music activities for your family! FUNDING PROVIDED BY CORPORATE FUNDING PROVIDED BY Enjoy Music Together ARTHUR! Children of all ages love music—and so do the characters on ARTHUR characters ARTHUR episodes feature reggae, folk, blues, pop, classical, and jazz so children can hear different types of music. The also play instruments and sing in a chorus. Try these activities with your children and give them a chance to learn and express themselves Tips for Parents adapted from the exhibition, through music. For more ideas, visit pbskidsgo.org/arthur. Tips for Parents 1. Listen to music with your kids. Talk about why you like certain MakingAmerica’s Music: Rhythm, Roots & Rhyme music. Explain that music is another way to express feelings. 2. Take your child to hear live music. Check your local news- paper for free events like choirs, concerts, parades, and dances. 3. Move with music—dance, swing, and boogie! Don’t be afraid to get © Boston Children’s Museum, 2003 silly. Clapping hands or stomping feet to music will also help your 4. Make instruments from house- child’s coordination. hold items. Kids love to experiment and create different sounds. Let children play real instruments, too. Watch POSTCARDS FROM BUSTER ! You can often find them at yard This new PBS KIDS series follows Buster as he travels the country with sales and thrift stores.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee on Appropriations UNITED STATES SENATE 135Th Anniversary
    107th Congress, 2d Session Document No. 13 Committee on Appropriations UNITED STATES SENATE 135th Anniversary 1867–2002 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 2002 ‘‘The legislative control of the purse is the central pil- lar—the central pillar—upon which the constitutional temple of checks and balances and separation of powers rests, and if that pillar is shaken, the temple will fall. It is...central to the fundamental liberty of the Amer- ican people.’’ Senator Robert C. Byrd, Chairman Senate Appropriations Committee United States Senate Committee on Appropriations ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia, TED STEVENS, Alaska, Ranking Chairman THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi ANIEL NOUYE Hawaii D K. I , ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania RNEST OLLINGS South Carolina E F. H , PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico ATRICK EAHY Vermont P J. L , CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri OM ARKIN Iowa T H , MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky ARBARA IKULSKI Maryland B A. M , CONRAD BURNS, Montana ARRY EID Nevada H R , RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama ERB OHL Wisconsin H K , JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire ATTY URRAY Washington P M , ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah YRON ORGAN North Dakota B L. D , BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado IANNE EINSTEIN California D F , LARRY CRAIG, Idaho ICHARD URBIN Illinois R J. D , KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas IM OHNSON South Dakota T J , MIKE DEWINE, Ohio MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana JACK REED, Rhode Island TERRENCE E. SAUVAIN, Staff Director CHARLES KIEFFER, Deputy Staff Director STEVEN J. CORTESE, Minority Staff Director V Subcommittee Membership, One Hundred Seventh Congress Senator Byrd, as chairman of the Committee, and Senator Stevens, as ranking minority member of the Committee, are ex officio members of all subcommit- tees of which they are not regular members.
    [Show full text]
  • “Mcconnell Majorities” in Supreme Court Decision-Making
    PRESIDENT-SHOPPING FOR A NEW SCALIA: THE ILLEGITIMACY OF “MCCONNELL MAJORITIES” IN SUPREME COURT DECISION-MAKING J. Stephen Clark* WASHINGTON, June 29—By the slimmest of margins, the Supreme Court today ended its decades of protecting abortion rights and overruled Roe v. Wade,1 the 1973 decision that established abortion as a constitutional right.2 The breaking news one day in June 2019 is the demise of Roe v. Wade. By a vote of 5-4, the Supreme Court has overruled the precedent and left the protection of abortion rights to the sole discretion of lawmakers. There had been no majority for such a decision until President Trump had the chance to make two appointments to the Court. One of those appointees wrote the majority opinion. Perhaps fittingly, the author of the opinion was the successor to the late Justice Antonin Scalia, who strove for this goal more vigorously than any member of the Court since 1973. Of course, every supporter of abortion rights realizes that the Trump appointee now sits on the High Court only because President Obama’s nominee for the same seat was ignored by the Senate for eleven months. The overruling of Roe is directly traceable to that stonewalling and its mastermind—the majority leader, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky. Why should supporters of abortion rights accept the legitimacy of a Court decision handed down by a bare majority that owes its fifth vote to Mitch McConnell’s Supreme Court Justice? The answer is that they would not, nor should they. Contrary to McConnell’s repeated claims, his posture of determined inaction * Professor of Law, Albany Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Film Review Aggregators and Their Effect on Sustained Box Office Performance" (2011)
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2011 Film Review Aggregators and Their ffecE t on Sustained Box Officee P rformance Nicholas Krishnamurthy Claremont McKenna College Recommended Citation Krishnamurthy, Nicholas, "Film Review Aggregators and Their Effect on Sustained Box Office Performance" (2011). CMC Senior Theses. Paper 291. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/291 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CLAREMONT McKENNA COLLEGE FILM REVIEW AGGREGATORS AND THEIR EFFECT ON SUSTAINED BOX OFFICE PERFORMANCE SUBMITTED TO PROFESSOR DARREN FILSON AND DEAN GREGORY HESS BY NICHOLAS KRISHNAMURTHY FOR SENIOR THESIS FALL / 2011 November 28, 2011 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my parents for their constant support of my academic and career endeavors, my brother for his advice throughout college, and my friends for always helping to keep things in perspective. I would also like to thank Professor Filson for his help and support during the development and execution of this thesis. Abstract This thesis will discuss the emerging influence of film review aggregators and their effect on the changing landscape for reviews in the film industry. Specifically, this study will look at the top 150 domestic grossing films of 2010 to empirically study the effects of two specific review aggregators. A time-delayed approach to regression analysis is used to measure the influencing effects of these aggregators in the long run. Subsequently, other factors crucial to predicting film success are also analyzed in the context of sustained earnings.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthur A. Chapin, Jr. Oral History Interview—JFK#1, 2/24/1967 Administrative Information
    Arthur A. Chapin, Jr. Oral History Interview—JFK#1, 2/24/1967 Administrative Information Creator: Arthur A. Chapin, Jr. Interviewer: John Stewart Date of Interview: February 24, 1967 Place of Interview: Washington, D.C. Length: 29 pages Biographical Note Chapin was a staff member on the Democratic National Committee (1958-1961) and Assistant to the Secretary of the U.S. Employment Service in the Department of Labor. In this interview he discusses his work on behalf of the Democratic National Committee for the 1960 Democratic National Convention, the 1960 Kennedy-for-President campaign’s voter registration drive, and campaign efforts towards African American voters, among other issues. Access Open. Usage Restrictions According to the deed of gift signed April, 14, 1970, copyright of these materials has been assigned to United States Government. Users of these materials are advised to determine the copyright status of any document from which they wish to publish. Copyright The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excesses of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.
    [Show full text]
  • New York's Political Resurgence
    April 8, 2015 New York’s political resurgence by JOSHUA SPIVAK New York, once a center of America's political world, long ago fell on hard times. Where the state was once practically guaranteed a slot on at least one of the presidential tickets, it has been many years since a New Yorker was a real contender for the presidency. And the record in Congress has been even worse — there the state always underperformed. But that may all be changing in a hurry. Former Senator Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) is the overwhelming favorite for the Democratic presidential nomination and now, thanks to the retirement of Sen. Harry Reid, (D-Nev.), Sen. Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) is the likely next Democratic Leader in the Senate. For the first time in decades, the Empire State may be a state on the political rise. Schumer’s ascension may be the biggest break with history. For the better part of a century, New York was the presidential incubator. But the state has never been particularly successful in Congress. No New Yorker has ever served as Senate Majority or Minority Leader. It had one Minority Whip — the first one ever, back in 1915. Since then, no other New Yorker has served in the top two positions in the upper chamber. New Yorkers haven’t exactly grabbed the reigns in the House either — the state has only elected two Speakers of the House — the last one, Theodore Pomeroy, left office in 1869. Even the lower leadership positions have been bereft of New Yorkers. The state has provided one House Majority Leader — the very first one, Sereno Payne.
    [Show full text]
  • John Lewis' Re-Establishment of Pedestrian Access to Richmond Park
    JOHN LEWIS' RE-ESTABLISHMENT OF PEDESTRIAN ACCESS � TO RICHMOND PARK � Purpose This note sets out details of the legal action taken by John Lewis in the 1750s to preserve rights of access to the Park. Some historical background is given to put Lewis' actions into context. Sources The note draws, inter alia, on factual accounts in the following books: ● "Richmond Park: the history of a Royal Deer Park" by Michael Baxter Brown (1985) ● "A History of Richmond Park" by CL Collenette (1937) ● "Richmond Park: Portrait of a Royal Playground" by Pamela Fletcher Jones (1972) ● "The Royal Manor of Richmond with Petersham, Ham & Kew" by Mrs Arthur G (Nancy) Bell (1907) ● "Palaces and Parks of Richmond and Kew" by John Cloake and ● "The Walker's Guide - Richmond Park" by David McDowall (2006) The debt to the writers of these books is acknowledged. Enclosure of the Park In 1637, Charles I completed the enclosure of what is now Richmond Park as his new hunting ground. Prior to that the land, which was at first called "Richmond New Park", had consisted principally of lands owned by the parishes of Ham, Mortlake, Petersham, Roehampton, Kingston, Richmond and Putney. Two farms - Hill Farm and Hartleton Farm - were also located here, and a significant number of landowners had holdings. Certain roads were also in place (see map overleaf). In short, the area was much like any other rural area around which one might have built an eight-mile wall. It can be seen that, prior to enclosure, the principal roads ran between (i) Richmond Gate and Ladderstile Gate and (ii) Ham Gate and a point at the north-eastern end of an ancient road called Deane's Lane.
    [Show full text]
  • Hooray for Health Arthur Curriculum
    Reviewed by the American Academy of Pediatrics HHoooorraayy ffoorr HHeeaalltthh!! Open Wide! Head Lice Advice Eat Well. Stay Fit. Dealing with Feelings All About Asthma A Health Curriculum for Children IS PR O V IDE D B Y FUN D ING F O R ARTHUR Dear Educator: Libby’s® Juicy Juice® has been a proud sponsor of the award-winning PBS series ARTHUR® since its debut in 1996. Like ARTHUR, Libby’s Juicy Juice, premium 100% juice, is wholesome and loved by kids. Promoting good health has always been a priority for us and Juicy Juice can be a healthy part of any child’s balanced diet. Because we share the same commitment to helping children develop and maintain healthy lives, we applaud the efforts of PBS in producing quality educational television. Libby’s Juicy Juice hopes this health curriculum will be a valuable resource for teaching children how to eat well and stay healthy. Enjoy! Libby’s Juicy Juice ARTHUR Health Curriculum Contents Eat Well. Stay Fit.. 2 Open Wide! . 7 Dealing with Feelings . 12 Head Lice Advice . 17 All About Asthma . 22 Classroom Reproducibles. 30 Taping ARTHUR™ Shows . 32 ARTHUR Home Videos. 32 ARTHUR on the Web . 32 About This Guide Hooray for Health! is a health curriculum activity guide designed for teachers, after-school providers, and school nurses. It was developed by a team of health experts and early childhood educators. ARTHUR characters introduce five units exploring five distinct early childhood health themes: good nutrition and exercise (Eat Well. Stay Fit.), dental health (Open Wide!), emotions (Dealing with Feelings), head lice (Head Lice Advice), and asthma (All About Asthma).
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Personhood(S): the Incorporation of Novel Persons in American Law, Society, and Literature, 1870-1914
    Corporate Personhood(s): The Incorporation of Novel Persons in American Law, Society, and Literature, 1870-1914 By Eugene Francis McCarthy A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Rhetoric in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Marianne Constable, Chair Professor Samera Esmeir Professor Bryan Wagner Spring 2016 © Copyright 2016 Eugene Francis McCarthy All rights reserved Abstract Corporate Personhood(s): The Incorporation of Novel Persons in American Law, Society, and Literature, 1870-1914 by Eugene Francis McCarthy Doctor of Philosophy in Rhetoric University of California, Berkeley Professor Marianne Constable, Chair Recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Citizens United (2010) and Hobby Lobby (2014) have brought the concept of corporate personhood into mainstream discourse. By and large, the public reaction to corporate personhood has ranged from confused disapproval to partially informed outrage. The general suspicion focuses on the belief that individual persons are using the corporate form to cover up their own misdeeds and to shield themselves from personal liability. My investigation into the origin and nature of corporate personhood in the United States supports these suspicions. This study reveals that the legal fiction of corporate personhood has functioned as a prosthesis for natural persons from its inception in American law and society. This legal fiction’s foundations, history, and social impact are more complex and controversial than many contemporary critics suspect. In this dissertation, I explain corporate personhood’s origins in U.S. law and society so that we may better understand how this paradoxical person functions in American culture.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 White, Andrew Dickson. Autobiography of Andrew Dickson
    White, Andrew Dickson. Autobiography of Andrew Dickson White. 2 vols. New York: Century Co., 1905. Volume I PART I-ENVIRONMENT AND EDUCATION Chapter I. Boyhood in Central New York — 1832-1850 The " Military Tract " of New York. A settlement on the headwaters of the Susquehanna. Arrival of my grandfathers and grandmothers. Growth of the new settlement. First recollections of it. General character of my environment. My father and mother. Cortland Academy. Its twofold effect upon me. First schooling. Methods in primary studies. Physical education. Removal to Syracuse. The Syracuse Academy. Joseph Allen and Professor Root; their influence; moral side of the education thus obtained. General education outside the school. Removal to a "classical school "; a catastrophe. James W. Hoyt and his influence. My early love for classical studies. Discovery of Scott's novels. "The Gallery of British Artists." Effect of sundry conventions, public meetings, and lectures. Am sent to Geneva College ; treatment of faculty by students. A " Second Adventist" meeting; Howell and Clark; my first meeting with Judge Folger. Philosophy of student dissipation at that place and time 3 Chapter II. Yale and Europe — 1850-1857 My coup d'etat. Removal to Yale. New energy in study and reading. Influence of Emerson, Carlyle, and Ruskin. Yale in 1850. My disappointment at the instruction; character of president and professors; perfunctory methods in lower-class rooms; "gerund-grinding" vs. literature; James Hadley — his abilities and influence; other professors; influence of President Woolsey, Professors Porter, Silliman, and Dana; absence of literary instruction ; character of that period from a literary point of view ; influences from fellow-students.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present
    CHAIRMEN OF SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–present INTRODUCTION The following is a list of chairmen of all standing Senate committees, as well as the chairmen of select and joint committees that were precursors to Senate committees. (Other special and select committees of the twentieth century appear in Table 5-4.) Current standing committees are highlighted in yellow. The names of chairmen were taken from the Congressional Directory from 1816–1991. Four standing committees were founded before 1816. They were the Joint Committee on ENROLLED BILLS (established 1789), the joint Committee on the LIBRARY (established 1806), the Committee to AUDIT AND CONTROL THE CONTINGENT EXPENSES OF THE SENATE (established 1807), and the Committee on ENGROSSED BILLS (established 1810). The names of the chairmen of these committees for the years before 1816 were taken from the Annals of Congress. This list also enumerates the dates of establishment and termination of each committee. These dates were taken from Walter Stubbs, Congressional Committees, 1789–1982: A Checklist (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1985). There were eleven committees for which the dates of existence listed in Congressional Committees, 1789–1982 did not match the dates the committees were listed in the Congressional Directory. The committees are: ENGROSSED BILLS, ENROLLED BILLS, EXAMINE THE SEVERAL BRANCHES OF THE CIVIL SERVICE, Joint Committee on the LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, LIBRARY, PENSIONS, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS, RETRENCHMENT, REVOLUTIONARY CLAIMS, ROADS AND CANALS, and the Select Committee to Revise the RULES of the Senate. For these committees, the dates are listed according to Congressional Committees, 1789– 1982, with a note next to the dates detailing the discrepancy.
    [Show full text]