Predatory Lending and the Military: the Law and Geography of "Payday" Loans in Military Towns

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Predatory Lending and the Military: the Law and Geography of OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL VOLUME 66, NUMBER 4,2005 Predatory Lending and the Military: The Law and Geography of "Payday" Loans in Military Towns STEVEN M. GRAVES* AND CHRISTOPHER L. PETERSON** A heated national debate has developed over whether one type of high-cost predatory lender, commonly known as "'paydaylenders, " targetfinancially vulnerable militaryfamilies and whether the law protects them from such predation. Writing within the relatively new interdisciplinary "law and geography" movement, this Article provides geographicevidence thatpayday lenders do aggressively target American military personnel, irrespective of mostforms of legal regulation. This Article first provides a comprehensive introduction to payday lending business practices and to the financial vulnerability of military personnel. Next, this Article presents empiricalresearch gatheredfrom an examination of 20 states, 1516 counties, 13,253 ZIP codes, nearly 15,000payday lenders, and 109 military bases. High concentrations of payday lending businesses in counties, ZIP codes, and neighborhoods in close proximity to military bases werefound Observations were controlled by comparing the density ofpayday lender locations to bank locations. Each of the 20 states studied had a different legal andregulatory strategyfor addressing payday lending. However, the only regulatory strategy which preventedpayday lendersfrom targetingmilitary personnel was the aggressive and consistent enforcement of civil and criminal usury law. Going beyond the debate over predatory lending to militarypersonnel, this researchprovides a realistcheck on pure legal reasoningand unfoundedfaithin currentconsumer protection rules. *Assistant Professor of Geography, California State University, Northridge. The author gratefully acknowledges generous financial assistance from the College of Social and Behavioral Sciences at California State University, Northridge. **Assistant Professor of Law, University of Florida, Frederic G. Levin College of Law. The author wishes to thank the following for helpful conversations, comments, encouragement, research assistance, and suggestions: Reed Clary, Lynn Drysdale, Mark Fenster, Diana Henriques, Lyrissa Lidsky, Diane Mazur, Tera Peterson, Buddy Schulz, Sarah Stoddard,'Michael Wolf, and Barbara Woodhouse. Special thanks to Blake Delaney for exceptionally thorough and helpful research assistance. OHIO STATE LA WJOURNAL [Vol. 66:653 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................ ................................... .................. 655 II. BACKGROUND ............................................ 660 A. Payday Lending ................................................... ....... 660 1. What Are Payday Loans? ......................................................... 660 2. Payday Lending in History: Ancient Lineage and Recent R esurgence ................................................................................ 665 B. FinancialVulnerability of MilitaryPersonnel .............................. 675 1. DemographicPredisposition.................................................... 675 2. The Military Compensation System .......................................... 679 3. The Dislocationof Military Service Members ......................... 681 4. Military Culture and FinancialObligations ............................ 685 C. Payday Lending to Militaty Personnel.......................................... 686 1. Congress's Position: The Servicemembers' Civil Relief Act. .686 2. The Debate: Do Payday Lenders Target Military Service Mem bers? ................................................................................... 690 1I . METHO D S............................................................................................... 693 A. Law and Geography: Theoretical Considerations ....................... 693 B. EmpiricalMethodology .................................................................. 697 1. Study Overview: Sample, Scales of Resolution, and Control G roup .......................................................................................... 697 2. Data Sources and Mapping Techniques .................................. 699 3. StatisticalAnalysis of Payday Lender Location Density......... 701 IV. RESULTS: THE LAW AND GEOGRAPHY OF MILITARY PAYDAY LENDING JUXTAPOSED ................................................................................................ 704 A. FederalBanking Law and the Marquette Doctrine:A Backdrop to American Payday Lending .............................................................. 704 B. State Law and EmpiricalResults ................................................... 709 1. A labama ..................................................................................... 709 2. A rizona....................................................................................... 7 15 3. Califom ia ................................................................................... 718 4. Colorado .................................................................................... 725 5. Delaw are .................................................................................... 733 6. F lorida ....................................................................................... 740 7.Idaho .......................................................................................... 746 2005] PREDATORY LENDING AND THE MILITARY 655 8. Kentucky .....................................................................................749 9.Louisiana ...................................................................................756 10 .M issouri................................................................................... 76 1 11. N ew York ..................................................................................766 12. North Carolina........................................................................ 768 13. Ohio ..........................................................................................777 14. Oklahom a ................................................................................781 15. South Carolina........................................................................ 787 16. South Dakota ...........................................................................792 17. Tennessee .................................................................................797 18. Texas ........................................................................................800 19. Virginia ....................................................................................810 20. W ashington ..............................................................................815 V .AN ALY SIS ...............................................................................................822 A.Empirical Discussion...................................................................... 822 B.Legal and Public Policy Considerations....................................... 825 1.Voluntary Compliance and Industry Best Practices............... 825 2. State Law ...................................................................................827 3. FederalLaw ...............................................................................829 4. Military Leadership on Payday Lending .................................830 V I.C ON CLU SION .........................................................................................832 I.INTRODUCTION "Support the troops" has become a national rallying cry.Because we live in a complex and dangerous world, we as a society rely on the military to protect us. President George W. Bush recently stated that "Americans live in freedom because of our veterans' courage, dedication to duty, and love of country."' This sentiment speaks to the fundamental debt of honor and respect we owe the women and men who make great sacrifices, sometimes the ultimate sacrifice, to protect us.2 In satisfying this debt, the United States expends vast resources in caring for current and former military personnel and their families. 3 The 1 President George W. Bush, Proclamation on Veterans Day (Nov. 9, 2004) (transcript available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/11/20041109-5.html). 2See BERNARD J. VERKAMP, THE MORAL TREATMENT OF RETURNING WARRIORS IN EARLY MEDIEVAL AND MODERN TIMES 103-08 (1993) (discussing differing social approaches to reassimilating returning veterans with complex emotional and moral problems). 3 One commentator has emphasized the relative cost of family support programs: OHIO STATE LA WJOURNAL (Vol. 66:653 Department of Defense maintains a comprehensive system of social services aiming to meet every need of every member of every armed service family.4 Nevertheless, profound questions remain about the extent and nature of our support of military personnel. In recent years, scholars have asked compelling questions about the quality of life and overall well-being of military families. 5 Indeed, $25 billion of Defense Department spending on family support is actually $3 billion more than the Navy will spend this year developing and buying new ships, submarines, and aircraft. It exceeds what the Army, Navy, and Air Force each spend on their worldwide operations in a year. It equals nearly half of the Army's total budget. John Luddy, Meet the US. Government's Biggest Family Welfare Program, AM. ENTERPRISE, May/June 1996, at 63. 4 These programs include: a system of worship services, locations, and chaplains, government housing, housing subsidies, cost of living
Recommended publications
  • The Military Lending Act Five Years Later
    The Military Lending Act Five Years Later Impact On Servicemembers, the High-Cost Small Dollar Loan Market, and the Campaign against Predatory Lending Jean Ann Fox Director of Financial Services Consumer Federation of America May 29, 2012 1 Table of Contents Introduction ………………………………………………………………………3 I. Creditors and Consumer Credit Covered by MLA Rules…………………...5 II. Executive Summary: Findings and Recommendations…………………….9 III. Servicemembers Still Need Protection from Abusive Credit Products………………………………………………………………………14 IV. History of the Military Lending Act and DoD Regulations………………18 V. Impact of MLA on Covered Consumer Credit……………………………..21 VI. Maps Illustrate Impact of Military Lending Act at Selected Bases……...31 VII. Bank Payday Loans Not Covered by MLA Rules………………………..49 VIII. No Impact on Military Installment Loans……………………………….61 IX. No Impact on State Regulation of Lending to Non-resident Borrowers…………………………………………………………………….73 X. No Impact on Retail Installment Sales Credit or Rent-to-Own…………...76 XI. Enforcement Tools for Military Lending Act Must be Strengthened……81 XII. No Impact of Military Lending Act Allotment Protections……………...94 XIII. Impact of MLA on Advocacy to Protect all Americans……………….102 XIV. Access to Relief Society Assistance and Better Financial Options……104 2 The Military Lending Act Five Years Later Impact On Servicemembers, the High-Cost Small Dollar Loan Market, and the Campaign against Predatory Lending by Jean Ann Fox Consumer Federation of America May 29, 2012 Five years ago the Department of Defense
    [Show full text]
  • The Development and Improvement of Instructions
    THE WAR IN THE DESERT: THE VIETNAM ANTIWAR MOVEMENT IN THE AMERICAN SOUTHWEST A Thesis by BRANDON MICHAEL WARD Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS August 2009 Major Subject: History THE WAR IN THE DESERT: THE VIETNAM ANTIWAR MOVEMENT IN THE AMERICAN SOUTHWEST A Thesis by BRANDON MICHAEL WARD Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved by: Chair of Committee, Terry H. Anderson Committee Members, Carlos K. Blanton James S. Burk Head of Department, Walter L. Buenger August 2009 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT The War in the Desert: The Vietnam Antiwar Movement in the American Southwest. (August 2009) Brandon Michael Ward, B.A., Colorado State University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Terry H. Anderson The Vietnam antiwar movement developed in the American Southwest out of a coalition of Chicanos, GI‟s, and students who agreed that the Vietnam War was racist, imperialist, costly, and negatively affected them and their communities. The antiwar movement in the Southwest formed in 1967, made possible by the emergence of the Chicano and GI movements. Chicanos criticized the military for a disproportionate number of Mexican American combat deaths in Vietnam. The military sent activist youth from across the country to bases in the Southwest, where they protested the war alongside Chicanos and college students. Connections between Chicanos, GI‟s, and students developed into a strong antiwar movement in 1968-1969.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Reunion Friendly Convention and Visitor Bureaus, Hotels, Attractions and Services. Bringing Reunions and Locations Toge
    Bringing reunions and locations together since 1991 2018annual DIRECTORY YOUR RESOURCE FOR Military Reunion Friendly Convention and Visitor Bureaus, Hotels, Attractions and Services. 2018 ANNUAL DIRECTORY FROM THE situationDESK The Annual Directory is filled with MRN Website: fantastic information about our supplier partners. • Reunion organization (with or without logo) Each of them is aware of the special requirements • Reunion planner name of military reunions and take great care to be sure • Reunion dates your reunion goes off without a hitch. They are all • Reunion location very enthusiastic about working with you. Their • Embedded email link passion for our veteran community is evident from • Embedded website link the very first connection. • Reunion Details such as registration costs and This year, there are some new attractions to dates, agenda and planner message can be consider. Having traveled to many of them included as well. personally, I can say with certainty they are well The member listings included in the Annual worth the visit. Motts Military Museum, The Maine Directory are also on our website under “Find a Military Museum, USS Turner Joy, USS Alabama, Reunion Location” or “Places to hold a Reunion”. Storytellers and the Hideaway Farm are just some of New website listing features include the following: the amazing places to add to your reunion itinerary. Social Media: Connect to members FaceBook, Reunion Planners take note! On page 25 you will LinkedIn, Twitter, and YouTube accounts. see a form to post your reunion complimentary on Special Offers: Many of our members have our website and in the quarterly magazine. We are incentives, offers or discounts to help offset your expanding our services and now can submit your reunion budget.
    [Show full text]
  • Predatory Lending and the Military: the Law and Geography of “Payday” Loans in Military Towns
    PREDATORY LENDING AND THE MILITARY: THE LAW AND GEOGRAPHY OF “PAYDAY” LOANS IN MILITARY TOWNS Steven M. Graves* and Christopher L. Peterson** I. INTRODUCTION II. BACKGROUND A. Payday Lending 1. What Are Payday Loans? 2. Payday Lending in History: Ancient Lineage and Recent Resurgence B. Financial Vulnerability of Military Personnel 1. Demographic Predispositions 2. The Military Compensation System 3. Geographic Mobility and the Dislocation of Military Servicemembers 4. Military Culture and Financial Obligations C. Payday Lending to Military Personnel 1. Congress’s Position: The Service Members Civil Relief Act 2. The Debate: Do Payday Lenders Target Military Servicemembers? III. METHODS A. Law and Geography: Theoretical Considerations B. Empirical Methodology 1. Study Overview: Sample, Scales of Resolution, and Control Group 2. Data Sources and Mapping Techniques 3. Statistical Analysis of Payday Lender Location Density IV. RESULTS: THE LAW AND GEOGRAPHY OF MILITARY PAYDAY LENDING JUXTAPOSED A. Federal Banking Law and the Marquette Doctrine: A Backdrop to American Payday Lending B. State Law and Empirical Results 1. Alabama 2. Arizona *Assistant Professor of Geography, California State University, Northridge. The author gratefully acknowledges generous financial assistance from College of Social and Behavioral Sciences at California State University, Northridge. **Assistant Professor of Law, University of Florida, Fredric G. Levin College of Law. The author wishes to thank the following for helpful conversations, comments, encouragement, research assistance, and suggestions: Reed Clary, Lynn Drysdale, Diana Henriques, Lyrissa Lidsky, Diane Mazur, Tera Peterson, Buddy Schulz, Sarah Stoddard, Michael Wolf, and Barbara Woodhouse. Special thanks to Blake Delaney for exceptionally thorough and helpful research assistance. 2 PREDATORY LENDING AND THE MILITARY [Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Commissioner's Base Visit Report
    Base Visit Book DCN 2553 Commissioner's Base Visit Report Pope Air Force Base and Fort Bragg, North Carolina Realignment Recommendations Admiral Harold W. Gehman, Jr (USN, Ret) 24 May 2005 Base Visit Book DCN 2553 POPE AIR FORCE BASE, NORTH CAROLINA AND FORT BRAGG, NORTH CAROLINIA COMMISSION BASE VISIT 23-24 MAY TABLE OF CONTENTS TAB A. ITINERARY B. BASE SUMMARY SHEET C. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE RECOMMENDATION i D. MILITARY CAPABILITIES INDEX !hw E. INSTALLATION REVIEW F. STATE hL4P AND STATISTICAL DATA G. STATE CLOSURE HISTORY LIST H. PRESS ARTICLES AND CORRESPONDENCE Base Visit Book DCN 2553 Base Visit Book DCN 2553 Base Visit Book DCN 2553 NAME OF INSTALLATION, STATE COMMISSION BASE VISIT DATE OF BASE VISIT TABLE OF CONTENTS TAB A. ITINERARY B. BASE SUMMARY SHEET C. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE RECOMMENDATION D. MISSION COMPATABILITY INDEX E. INSTALLATION REVIEW w F. STATE MAP AND STATISTICAL DATA G. STATE CLOSURE HISTORY LIST H. PRESS ARTICLES AND CORRESPONDENCE Base Visit Book DCN 2553 ITINERARY FOR THE VISIT OF ADMIRAL HAROLD W. GEHMAN, JR (USN,RET) 111 DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT COMMISSION TO POPE AIR FORCE BASE, NORTH CAROLINA AND FORT BRAGG, NORTH CAROLINA VISIT DATE: Tuesday, 24 May 2005 MEMBERS IN PARTY: LTC Kevin Felix Dr. Mike Flinn HOST: Colonel Darren W. McDew, Commander. 43rdAirlift Wing PROJECT OFFICER: Lt. Col. Lisa Markgraf, Inspector General and Director of Staff, 43rdAirlift Wing Office: (910) 394-1798, Cell: (910) 237-6886 PROTOCOL: Ms. Anne Niece, 43 AWICCP, Office: (910) 394-4739, Cell (910) 224-6637. Lt. Angela Uribe-Olson, 43 AWICCP, Cell: (910) 797-5328 PURPOSE: Visit to Pope Air Force Base and Fort Bragg, North Carolina .
    [Show full text]
  • Periodic Reports on Army Entertainment Liaison Activities from Oct 2004 – Oct 2005
    Description of document: Periodic reports on Army entertainment liaison activities from Oct 2004 – Oct 2005 Requested date: 21-October-2005 Released date: 27-January-2007 Posted date: 03-January-2007 Title of Document Weekly Significant Activities Report, CROD-LA Weekly reports: Monday 4 October 2004 – Sunday 16 October 2005 Date/date range of document: 04-October-2004 – 6-October-2005 Source of document: Department of the Army Contracting Center of Excellence Army Contracting Agency 5200 Army Pentagon Washington, DC 20310-5200 The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CONTRACTING CENTER OF EXCELLENCE ARMY CONTRACTING AGENCY 5200 ARMY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20310-5200 JANUARY 27, 2007 CHIEF ATTORNEY & LEGAL SERVICES Re: FOIA Identification No. 06-054 This letter is in response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, dated October 21, 2005, for copies of the periodic reporting on Army entertainment liaison activities for the time period from October 1, 2004 to the date of your request.
    [Show full text]
  • Riptide on the Columbia: a Military Community
    Part III, Riptide on the Columbia: A Military Community Between the Wars, Vancouver, Washington and the Vancouver National Historic Reserve, 1920-1942, with suggestions for further research written by Donna L. Sinclair Center for Columbia River History with research assistance from Joshua Binus This document is the third in a research partnership between the Center for Columbia River History (CCRH) and the Department of the Interior National Park Service at Fort Vancouver National Historic Site in Vancouver, Washington. The National Park Service contracts with CCRH to encourage and support professional historical research, study, lectures and development in higher education programs related to the Fort Vancouver National Historic Site and the Vancouver National Historic Reserve (VNHR). The Center for Columbia River History is a consortium of the Washington State Historical Society, Portland State University, and Washington State University Vancouver. The mission of the Center for Columbia River History (www.ccrh.org) is to promote the study of the history of the Columbia River Basin. CCRH is dedicated to examining “hidden histories” in the Basin and to helping people think about the historical record from different perspectives. Funded by the National Park Service, Department of the Interior Fort Vancouver National Historic Site, Vancouver National Historic Reserve Printed, Vancouver, Washington, January 2005 Preface The site of the Vancouver National Historic Reserve has been strategically important for centuries. First, native people occupied the region, living along a trade route that was among the most populated areas in North America. Then in 1825, the Hudson’s Bay Company (HBC) established a fur trade post at the site along the Columbia River.
    [Show full text]
  • America's Defense Communities Magazine |2020
    WE ARE ONE COMMUNITY America’s Great Defense Communities How Communities Are Helping the Military Prepare for Climate Change Installation Commanders Sound off on the Importance of Defense Communities Defense Communities Respond to the Pandemic December 2020 PUBLISHER’S NOTE Why ‘One Community’ Matters The events of the past year, including the COVID-19 pandemic, have reminded us that when it comes to the big issues facing our installations, service members and their families, the fence line does not matter. hen communities and bases Lines.” Finally, we look across the are working as one, we make a country at “What We Do” and hear about Wdifference. This is not a new idea, stories of partnership and collaboration but an idea that is taking on new meaning from the people and places who are and impact. It’s the inspiring story of making a difference. being “one community.” We don’t know what the year ahead In this issue of America’s Defense will bring us, but we are hopeful that we Communities, we share the story of how being By Tim Ford, Chief Executive Officer, ADC can return to whatever normal might one community is making a difference. look like now. Regardless, the work of “We Are One Community” tells the America’s defense communities will compelling story of how communities continue, rooted in the compassion and answered the call of duty during the support for the military, and focused on pandemic, and how we are now tackling being “one community.” the difficult issues of racism and inequality. A special thanks to USAA, whose While our year changed, we are excited to support for this project and the entire still share the stories of this year’s class of Great American Defense Communities in military community over the past year “How We Serve: 5 Communities Show What has been inspiring.
    [Show full text]