DOCSLIB.ORG

Solar-Wind Control of Plasma Sheet Dynamics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Solar-Wind Control of Plasma Sheet Dynamics Ann. Geophys., 33, 845–855, 2015 www.ann-geophys.net/33/845/2015/ doi:10.5194/angeo-33-845-2015 © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Solar-wind control of plasma sheet dynamics M. Myllys1, E. Kilpua1, and T. Pulkkinen2 1Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, Finland 2Aalto University School of Electrical Engineering, P.O. Box 1100, 00076 Aalto, Finland Correspondence to: M. Myllys (minna.myllys@helsinki.fi) Received: 24 February 2015 – Revised: 21 May 2015 – Accepted: 22 May 2015 – Published: 21 July 2015 Abstract. The purpose of this study is to quantify how solar- 1 Introduction wind conditions affect the energy and plasma transport in the geomagnetic tail and its large-scale configuration. To iden- tify the role of various effects, the magnetospheric data were The coupling of the solar wind to the magnetosphere has long sorted according to different solar-wind plasma and inter- been a subject of active research. In particular, the mech- planetary magnetic field (IMF) parameters: speed, dynamic anisms of the energy transfer from the solar wind to the pressure, IMF north–south component, epsilon parameter, magnetosphere have been of great interest. According to the Auroral Electrojet (AE) index and IMF ultra low-frequency open model of the magnetosphere (Dungey, 1961), the mag- (ULF) fluctuation power. We study variations in the average netospheric magnetic field reconnects with the interplane- flow speed pattern and the occurrence rate of fast flow bursts tary magnetic field (IMF) on the dayside magnetopause. The in the magnetotail during different solar-wind conditions us- opened geomagnetic field lines are transported to the magne- ing magnetospheric data from five Time History of Events totail, where they are reconnected again. The resulting closed and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS) and stretched field lines migrate back to the dayside magne- mission spacecraft and solar-wind data from NASA’s OM- topause. This motion generates the large-scale plasma con- NIWeb. The time interval covers the years from 2008 to vection in the magnetosphere. 2011 during the deep solar minimum between cycles 23 and The energy transfer efficiency from the solar wind to the 24 and the relatively quiet rising phase of cycle 24. Hence, Earth’s magnetosphere is often studied by comparing vari- we investigate magnetospheric processes and solar-wind– ous coupling functions (combinations of solar-wind param- magnetospheric coupling during a relatively quiet state of the eters), as well as individual solar-wind parameters, with the magnetosphere. We show that the occurrence rate of the fast geomagnetic indices (Meng et al., 1973; Stamper et al., 1999; −1 Finch and Lockwood, 2007). For example, Akasofu’s epsilon (jVtailj> 100 km s ) sunward flows varies under different solar-wind conditions more than the occurrence of the fast parameter (Perreault and Akasofu, 1978; Akasofu, 1981) is a tailward flows. The occurrence frequency of the fast tailward commonly used coupling function to estimate the efficiency flows does not change much with the solar-wind conditions. of the energy transfer to the inner magnetosphere. The day- side reconnection rate depends strongly on the sign of the We also note that the sign of the IMF BZ has the most visible effect on the occurrence rate and pattern of the fast sunward IMF north–south component (BZ component). In addition, flows. High-speed flow bursts are more common during the the solar-wind speed has been found to correlate well with slow than fast solar-wind conditions. monthly and annual geomagnetic activity levels (Crooker et al., 1977; Finch et al., 2008). Keywords. Magnetospheric physics (plasma sheet) Plasma sheet flows play a central role in the magneto- spheric energy transport. The earliest studies focused mostly on the plasma sheet flow properties and studied the occur- rence rate and spatial distributions of the fast and slow ion flows (Angelopoulos et al., 1992, 1993; Baumjohann et al., 1990; Shiokawa et al., 1997; Wang et al., 2006). Most of these studies defined the threshold of the high-speed flow Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 846 M. Myllys et al.: Solar-wind control of plasma sheet dynamics −1 to be 400 km s . The bursty bulk flow events (BBF) (An- −15>X > − 30 RE (Ohtani et al., 2009). The dominance of gelopoulos et al., 1992, 1993) are defined as periods when tailward flows with northward BZ indicates that reconnection the flow speed average exceeds 100 km s−1 and is above is not the primary cause of the flows. Ohtani et al.(2009) sug- 400 km s−1 (Baumjohann et al., 1990; Angelopoulos et al., gest that the sources of tailward flows could be the balloon 1992) for at least two samples during the 1 min period. instability and rebound of fast sunward flows near the Earth. High-speed (> 250 km s−1) flows have also been classified The latter mechanism is supported by the fact that tailward into two distinct categories based on their ion distributions: flows are normally preceded by fast sunward flows and also bulk flows and field-aligned beams (Nakamura et al., 1991; by global Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) simulations (Wilt- Raj et al., 2002). Bulk flows are perpendicular to the mag- berger et al., 2000). netic field at the neutral sheet but have a large field-aligned The purpose of this study is to quantify how solar-wind component at higher magnetic latitudes. Field-aligned beams conditions affect the energy and plasma transport in the are mainly detected away from the neutral sheet. The occur- geomagnetic tail. We use tail observations from the five rence of BBF shows a dawn–dusk asymmetry in contrast to THEMIS spacecraft during the years 2008–2011. During this field-aligned beams (Raj et al., 2002). period the THEMIS spacecraft spend a considerable time in In recent studies, the average bulk flow pattern and the the geomagnetic tail allowing us to compile statistical maps characteristics of the plasma sheet flows with speed have of plasma flow properties and to study the tail energy trans- been studied during the different IMF BZ conditions and sub- port. In addition, this time period corresponds to the ex- storm phases (Juusola et al., 2011a,b). However, there are tended and prolonged solar activity minimum between solar only few studies of the large-scale magnetospheric flow pat- cycle 23 and 24 and the relatively quiet rising phase of cycle tern under different solar-wind conditions. One such study 24. This allows us to investigate magnetospheric processes was recently published by Pulkkinen et al.(2013), who stud- and solar-wind–magnetospheric coupling during a relatively ied plasma sheet flows during steady magnetospheric con- quiet state of the magnetosphere. To uniquely identify the vection events. role of various effects, the magnetospheric data were sorted Previous studies of plasma sheet convection have shown according to different solar-wind plasma parameters and by that (1) the average ion bulk flow speed in the central plasma the Auroral Electrojet (AE) index. We study the variations in sheet has been found to be low, below 100 km s−1 (Baumjo- the average bulk flow speed pattern and the occurrence of the hann et al., 1990; Juusola et al., 2011b); (2) high-speed flows flow bursts exceeding 50 and 100 km s−1 and their preferred (> 400 km s−1) occur in bursts mostly less than 10 s in du- direction during different solar-wind conditions. ration (Baumjohann et al., 1990); (3) the slow flow pat- In this paper the first section describes the data sources and −1 tern (jv?j<200 km s ) is not significantly different dur- methods used in this study. The second section analyses the ing northward and southward IMF conditions, but the over- results. We end with discussion and conclusions. all flow speed is higher during southward IMF (Wang et al., 2006); (4) the largest occurrence rates of high-speed bursts (> 400 km s−1) are found near the midnight merid- 2 Data and methods ian, and their occurrence peaks strongly in the sunward di- 2.1 Data sources rection (Baumjohann et al., 1990); (5) high-speed bursts −1 (> 400 km s ) are almost always directed earthward in- The solar wind and AE index data with 1 min resolution − D side 20 RE (Earth radius 6372 km), indicating that their have been extracted from NASA Goddard Space Flight Cen- − source is beyond X (GSM)< 19 RE (Shiokawa et al., ter’s OMNI data set through the OMNIWeb interface (http: 1997); (6) the occurrence rate of the high-speed burst de- //omniweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/). The data have been propagated D − − creases closer the Earth in the region from X 19 to 9 RE to the nose of the Earth’s bow shock. The parameters used (Shiokawa et al., 1997); (7) the tailward BBFs are rare and in- are the solar-wind flow speed, IMF components in the GSM frequent but the ratio of tailward to earthward BBFs increases (geocentric solar magnetospheric coordinate system) coordi- with distance from the Earth (Angelopoulus et al., 1994); (8) nates, dynamic pressure and AE index. BBF events occur in only 10 % of crossings (Angelopoulus The magnetospheric data come from the five THEMIS et al., 1994). spacecraft. The THEMIS mission consists of five identically Although on average the plasma flows are directed sun- instrumented satellites orbiting the Earth at different dis- ward in the plasma sheet, there are also tailward flows. The tances. The orbits cover the magnetotail from 4 to 30 RE. The tailward flows can be classified depending on their BZ ori- ion velocity and density measurements come from the ESA entation. Tailward flows with southward BZ are rare and instrument (McFadden et al., 2008) and the spin-averaged are usually considered to be caused by reconnection tak- magnetic field measurements come from the Flux Gate Mag- ing place earthward of the observation point.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ejecta Event Associated with a Two&Hyphen;Step Geomagnetic Storm
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 111, A11104, doi:10.1029/2006JA011893, 2006 A two-ejecta event associated with a two-step geomagnetic storm C. J. Farrugia,1 V. K. Jordanova,1,2 M. F. Thomsen,2 G. Lu,3 S. W. H. Cowley,4 and K. W. Ogilvie5 Received 2 June 2006; revised 1 September 2006; accepted 12 September 2006; published 16 November 2006. [1] A new view on how large disturbances in the magnetosphere may be prolonged and intensified further emerges from a recently discovered interplanetary process: the collision/merger of interplanetary (IP) coronal mass ejections (ICMEs; ejecta) within 1 AU. As shown in a recent pilot study, the merging process changes IP parameters dramatically with respect to values in isolated ejecta. The resulting geoeffects of the coalesced (‘‘complex’’) ejecta reflect a superposition of IP triggers which may result in, for example, two-step, major geomagnetic storms. In a case study, we isolate the effects on ring current enhancement when two coalescing ejecta reached Earth on 31 March 2001. The magnetosphere ‘‘senses’’ the presence of the two ejecta and responds with a reactivation of the ring current soon after it started to recover from the passage of the first ejection, giving rise to a double-dip (DD) great storm (each min Dst < À250 nT). A drift-loss global kinetic model of ring current buildup shows that in this case the major factor determining the intensity of the storm activity is the very high (up to 10 cmÀ3) plasma sheet density. The plasma sheet density, in turn, is found to correlate well with the very high solar wind density, suggesting the compression of the leading ejecta as the source of the hot, superdense plasma sheet in this case.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanisms of Formation of Multiple Current Sheets in the Heliospheric Plasma Sheet
    EGU2020-3945 https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-3945 EGU General Assembly 2020 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Mechanisms of formation of multiple current sheets in the heliospheric plasma sheet Evgeniy Maiewski1, Helmi Malova2,3, Roman Kislov3,4, Victor Popov5, Anatoly Petrukovich3, and Lev Zelenyi3 1National Research University”Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russian Federation ([email protected]) 2Scobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia ([email protected]) 3Space Research Institute of the Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia 4Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IZMIRAN), Moscow, Russia 5Faculty of Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia When spacecraft cross the heliospheric plasma sheet (HPS) that separates large-scale magnetic sectors of the opposite direction in the solar wind, multiple rapid fluctuations of a sign of the radial magnetic field component are observed very often, indicating the presence of multiple current sheets occurring within the HPS. Possible mechanisms of formation of these structures in the solar wind are proposed. Taking into accout that the streamer belt in the solar corona is believed to be the main source of the slow solar wind in the heliosphere, we suggest that the effect of the multi-layered HPS is determined by the extension of many streamer-belt-borne thin current sheets oriented along the neutral line of the interplanetary magnetic field. Within the framework of a proposed MHD model, self-consistent distributions of the key solar wind characteristics which depend on streamer propreties are investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Wind Properties and Geospace Impact of Coronal Mass Ejection-Driven Sheath Regions: Variation and Driver Dependence E
    Solar Wind Properties and Geospace Impact of Coronal Mass Ejection-Driven Sheath Regions: Variation and Driver Dependence E. K. J. Kilpua, D. Fontaine, C. Moissard, M. Ala-lahti, E. Palmerio, E. Yordanova, S. Good, M. M. H. Kalliokoski, E. Lumme, A. Osmane, et al. To cite this version: E. K. J. Kilpua, D. Fontaine, C. Moissard, M. Ala-lahti, E. Palmerio, et al.. Solar Wind Properties and Geospace Impact of Coronal Mass Ejection-Driven Sheath Regions: Variation and Driver Dependence. Space Weather: The International Journal of Research and Applications, American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2019, 17 (8), pp.1257-1280. 10.1029/2019SW002217. hal-03087107 HAL Id: hal-03087107 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03087107 Submitted on 23 Dec 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. RESEARCH ARTICLE Solar Wind Properties and Geospace Impact of Coronal 10.1029/2019SW002217 Mass Ejection-Driven Sheath Regions: Variation and Key Points: Driver Dependence • Variation of interplanetary properties and geoeffectiveness of CME-driven sheaths and their dependence on the E. K. J. Kilpua1 , D. Fontaine2 , C. Moissard2 , M. Ala-Lahti1 , E. Palmerio1 , ejecta properties are determined E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Observatory (MIO)
    1 The Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Observatory (MIO) …a mission concept to answer the question “What Drives Auroral Arcs” ♥ Get inside the aurora in the magnetosphere ♥ Know you’re inside the aurora ♥ Measure critical gradients writeup by: Joe Borovsky Los Alamos National Laboratory [email protected] (505)667-8368 updated April 4, 2002 Abstract: The MIO mission concept involves a tight swarm of satellites in geosynchronous orbit that are magnetically connected to a ground-based observatory, with a satellite-based electron beam establishing the precise connection to the ionosphere. The aspect of this mission that enables it to solve the outstanding auroral problem is “being in the right place at the right time – and knowing it”. Each of the many auroral-arc-generator mechanisms that have been hypothesized has a characteristic gradient in the magnetosphere as its fingerprint. The MIO mission is focused on (1) getting inside the auroral generator in the magnetosphere, (2) knowing you are inside, and (3) measuring critical gradients inside the generator. The decisive gradient measurements are performed in the magnetosphere with satellite separations of 100’s of km. The magnetic footpoint of the swarm is marked in the ionosphere with an electron gun firing into the loss cone from one satellite. The beamspot is detected from the ground optically and/or by HF radar, and ground-based auroral imagers and radar provide the auroral context of the satellite swarm. With the satellites in geosynchronous orbit, a single ground observatory can spot the beam image and monitor the aurora, with full-time conjunctions between the satellites and the aurora.
    [Show full text]
  • Dust Clouds and Plasmoids in Saturn's Magnetosphere
    Dust clouds and plasmoids in Saturn’s Magnetosphere as seen with four Cassini instruments Emil Khalisi1 Max-Planck-Institute for Nuclear Physics, Saupfercheckweg 1, D–69117 Heidelberg, Germany Abstract We revisit the evidence for a ”dust cloud” observed by the Cassini space- craft at Saturn in 2006. The data of four instruments are simultaneously compared to interpret the signatures of a coherent swarm of dust that would have remained near the equatorial plane for as long as six weeks. The con- spicuous pattern, as seen in the dust counters of the Cosmic Dust Analyser (CDA), clearly repeats on three consecutive revolutions of the spacecraft. That particular cloud is estimated to about 1.36 Saturnian radii in size, and probably broadening. We also present a reconnection event from the magnetic field data (MAG) that leave behind several plasmoids like those reported from the Voyager flybys in the early 1980s. That magnetic bubbles happened at the dawn side of Saturn’s magnetosphere. At their nascency, the magnetic field showed a switchover of its alignment, disruption of flux tubes and a recovery on a time scale of about 30 days. However, we cannot rule out that different events might have taken place. Empirical evidence is shown at another occasion when a plasmoid was carrying a cloud of tiny dust particles such that a connection between plasmoids and coherent dust clouds is probable. Keywords: Dust clouds, Saturn, Cassini mission, Cosmic Dust Analyser, arXiv:1702.01579v1 [astro-ph.EP] 6 Feb 2017 Magnetosphere URL: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.12.030 (Emil Khalisi) 1Corresponding author: [email protected] Preprint accepted by Advances in Space Research [JASR13029] 7th February 2017 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Cold and Dense Plasma Sheet Caused by Solar Wind Entry: Direct Evidence
    atmosphere Case Report Cold and Dense Plasma Sheet Caused by Solar Wind Entry: Direct Evidence Yue Yu 1,2, Zuzheng Chen 1,2,* and Fang Chen 1,2 1 School of Space and Environment, Beihang University, Beijing 100089, China; [email protected] (Y.Y.); [email protected] (F.C.) 2 Key Laboratory of Space Environment Monitoring and Information Processing, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing 100089, China * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 12 June 2020; Accepted: 2 August 2020; Published: 7 August 2020 Abstract: We present a coordinated observation with the Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) mission, located in the Earth’s magnetotail plasma sheet, and the Acceleration, Reconnection, Turbulence, and Electrodynamics of the Moon’s Interaction with the Sun (ARTEMIS) mission, located in the solar wind, in order to understand the formation mechanism of the cold and dense plasma sheet (CDPS). MMS detected two CDPSs composed of two ion populations with different energies, where the energy of the cold ion population is the same as that of the solar wind measured by ARTEMIS. This feature directly indicates that the CDPSs are caused by the solar wind entry. In addition, He+ was observed 3 3 in the CDPSs. The plasma density in these two CDPSs are ~1.8 cm− and ~10 cm− , respectively, roughly 4–30 times the average value of a plasma sheet. We performed a cross-correlation analysis on the ion density of the CDPS and the solar wind, and we found that it takes 3.7–5.9 h for the solar wind to enter the plasma sheet.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 the Magnetosphere 3-1 Formation of the Magnetosphere and Magnetospheric Plasma Regime
    3 The Magnetosphere 3-1 Formation of the Magnetosphere and Magnetospheric Plasma Regime OBARA Takahiro The Earth's magnetosphere is formed by the plasma flow from the Sun; i.e. solar wind. This solar wind particle can enter the magnetosphere through non-MHD processes and pro- duces specific regions of plasma. This is due to the convection motion seen in the magne- tosphere. An enhancement of the magnetospheric convection causes storms and sub- storms in the magnetosphere. Highly energetic particles can be produced through very effi- cient acceleration processes during the storms. In this paper we describe the fundamental physics of the magnetosphere, aiming a transition of researches to the Space Weather fore- cast. Keywords Magnetosphere, Plasma, Magnetospheric convection, Storms and substorms, Ener- getic particles 1 Outline of the Formation of the in the southern hemisphere. Magnetosphere and the Mag- There is an influx of solar wind plasma netospheric Plasma Structure particles in the lobe region. The area of the lobe near the magnetopause is referred to as The magnetosphere is a distinct region in the mantle. The magnetic field intensity is space surrounding the Earth, and its structure low near the equatorial plane, where the north- has been the subject of numerous detailed ern and southern lobes meet. Hot plasma satellite observations. Fig.1 shows a represen- accumulates in this region, referred to as the tation of this structure, with the upper front plasma sheet. Characteristic plasma regimes quarter removed to show the interior. The are present near the Earth, with plasma with Earth is at the center, and the solar wind flows higher energies relative to the plasma sheet.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Physics Handout 2 : the Earth's Magnetosphere And
    Space Physics Handout 2 : The Earth’s magnetosphere and ionosphere The previous handout discussed the highly conducting plasma which the Sun emits, known as the solar wind. This highly conducting plasma travels at supersonic speeds of about 500 km/s as a result of the supersonic expansion of the solar corona. As a result of this plasma being highly conductive, the solar wind magnetic field is frozen into the plasma (something we will discuss and derive in the lectures). The implication of this is that when the solar wind encounters the dipolar magnetic field of the Earth, that it simply cannot penetrate through it and what happens is that it is slowed down and to a large extent deflected around it. Since the solar wind hits the obstacle (the Earth’s magnetic field) at supersonic speeds, a shock wave is formed, which is known as the bow shock. At this bow shock the solar wind plasma is slowed down and a substantial fraction of the kinetic energy of the particles is converted into thermal energy. The region of thermalised subsonic plasma behind the bow shock is called the magnetosheath. The magnetosheath plasma is denser and hotter than the solar wind plasma and the magnetic field values are higher in this region compared to out in the solar wind. The shocked solar wind plasma in the magnetosheath cannot easily penetrate the Earth’s magnetic field and is deflected around it. The boundary separating the two different regions is called the magnetopause and the cavity generated by the solar wind interaction with the Earth’s magnetic field is known as the magnetosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Temperature Variations in the Dayside Magnetosheath and Their
    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics RESEARCH ARTICLE Temperature variations in the dayside magnetosheath 10.1002/2016JA023729 and their dependence on ion-scale magnetic structures: Key Points: THEMIS statistics and measurements by MMS • A positive correlation exists between the amplitude of magnetic fluctuations and temperature A. P. Dimmock1 , A. Osmane1 , T. I. Pulkkinen1 , K. Nykyri2 , and E. Kilpua3 variation • Temperature fluctuations are strongly 1 associated with larger local in Department of Electronics and Nanoengineering, School of Electrical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland, 2 ion-scale magnetic structures than Centre for Space and Atmospheric Research, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, Florida, USA, the fluid input at the shock 3Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland • The amplitude of ion gyroscale fluctuations and in situ temperature variations are favored by the Abstract The magnetosheath contains an array of waves, instabilities, and nonlinear magnetic dawn flank structures which modify global plasma properties by means of various wave-particle interactions. The present work demonstrates that ion-scale magnetic field structures (∼0.2–0.5 Hz) observed in the dayside Correspondence to: A. P. Dimmock, magnetosheath are statistically correlated to ion temperature changes on orders 10–20% of the andrew.dimmock@aalto.fi background value. In addition, our statistical analysis implies that larger temperature changes are in equipartition to larger amplitude magnetic structures. This effect was more pronounced behind the Citation: quasi-parallel bow shock and during faster solar wind speeds. The study of two separate intervals suggests Dimmock, A. P., A. Osmane, that this effect can result from both local and external drivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Predominance of ECH Wave Contribution to Diffuse Aurora in Earth's Outer Magnetosphere
    UCLA UCLA Previously Published Works Title Predominance of ECH wave contribution to diffuse aurora in Earth's outer magnetosphere Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8fx1f8cz Journal Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 120(1) ISSN 2169-9380 Authors Zhang, XJ Angelopoulos, V Ni, B et al. Publication Date 2015 DOI 10.1002/2014JA020455 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California PUBLICATIONS Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics RESEARCH ARTICLE Predominance of ECH wave contribution to diffuse 10.1002/2014JA020455 aurora in Earth’s outer magnetosphere Key Points: Xiao-Jia Zhang1,2, Vassilis Angelopoulos1, Binbin Ni3, and Richard M. Thorne2 • The role of ECH waves in driving fi diffuse aurora is quanti ed globally 1Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences and Institute of Geophysics and Space Physics, University of California, • ECH waves are the dominant driver of 2 diffuse aurora in the outer Los Angeles, California, USA, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, 3 magnetosphere California, USA, Department of Space Physics, School of Electronic Information, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China • Relative contribution of high-latitude precipitation decreases in active times Abstract Due to its importance for global energy dissipation in the ionosphere, the diffuse aurora has been intensively studied in the past 40 years. Its origin (precipitation of 0.5–10 keV electrons from the Correspondence to: plasma sheet without potential acceleration) has been generally attributed to whistler-mode chorus wave X.-J. Zhang, scattering in the inner magnetosphere (R < ~8 RE), while the scattering mechanism beyond that distance [email protected] remains unresolved.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Relationship of the Plasmapause to the Equatorward
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 87, NO. All, PAGES 9059-9069, NOVEMBER l, 1982 On the Relationship of the Plasmapauseto the Equatorward Boundary of the Auroral Oval and to the Inner Edge of the Plasma Sheet J. L. HORWlTZ,1 W. K. Co• 2 C R BAUGHER,3 C R. CHAPPELL3 L A FRANK,4 T. E. EASTMAN,4 R. R. ANDERSON,4 E.G. SHELLEY,5 AND D. T. YOUNG6 ISEE 1 observations of the plasmapause are compared with simultaneous observations of the electron plasma sheet and also the auroral oval observed in DMSP photographs. Only a limited amount of appropriate data was available for the comparisons: the plasmapause/plasmasheet inner edge comparisonswere restricted to the early and late morning sectors, while there were two satisfactory comparisons of the plasmapauseand the equatorward boundary of the auroral oval in the evening sector. However, these examples indicate that the plasmapauselocation often coincides to within zXL- 0.1-0.2 with both the plasma sheet inner boundary and the field line threading the equatorward boundary of the auroral oval. This co-location of the plasmapauseand the plasma sheet inner edge may be due to shielding of the magnetosphericconvection electric field by an Alfv6n layer located at the inner edge of the plasma sheet as discussedby Jaggi and Wolf (1973) and others. INTRODUCTION sheet population and inhomogeneous ionospheric electrical The locations of both the plasmapauseand the earthward conductivities together cause a modification of the magneto- edge of the plasma sheet are sensitive indicators of large- spheric electric field distribution in which the earthward scale magnetospheric convection electric fields [Axford, edge of the plasma sheet coincides with an 'Alfv6n layer' 1969].
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Recent Studies on Coronal Dynamics: Streamers, Coronal Mass Ejections, and Their Interactions
    Review Progress of Projects Supported by NSFC May 2013 Vol.58 No.14: 15991624 Geophysics doi: 10.1007/s11434-013-5669-6 A review of recent studies on coronal dynamics: Streamers, coronal mass ejections, and their interactions CHEN Yao Institute of Space Sciences and School of Space Science and Physics, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China Received October 8, 2012; accepted December 25, 2012; published online March 26, 2013 In this article I present a review of recent studies on coronal dynamics, including research progresses on the physics of coronal streamers that are the largest structure in the corona, physics of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) that may cause a global disturb- ance to the corona, as well as physics of CME-streamer interactions. The following topics will be discussed in depth: (1) accelera- tion of the slow wind flowing around the streamer considering the effect of magnetic flux tube curvature; (2) physical mechanism accounting for persistent releases of streamer blobs and diagnostic results on the temporal variability of the slow wind speed with such events; (3) force balance analysis and energy release mechanism of CMEs with a flux rope magnetohydrodynamic model; (4) statistical studies on magnetic islands along the coronal-ray structure behind a CME and the first observation of magnetic island coalescence with associated electron acceleration; and (5) white light and radio manifestations of CME-streamer interactions. These studies shed new light on the physics of coronal streamers, the acceleration of the slow wind, the physics of solar eruptions, the physics of magnetic reconnection and associated electron acceleration, the large-scale coronal wave phenomenon, as well as the physics accounting for CME shock-induced type II radio bursts.
    [Show full text]