DOCSLIB.ORG

Spatial Foundations of Inequality: a Conceptual Model and Empirical Overview.” RSF: the Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 3(2): 1–33

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Spatial Foundations of Inequality: a Conceptual Model and Empirical Overview.” RSF: the Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 3(2): 1–33 Spatial Foundations of an em Pirical overview Inequality: A Conceptual Model and Empirical Overview GeorGe Galster and Patrick s harkey Inequalities among individuals and house- causal estimates of the impact of space on in- holds in achieved socioeconomic status (in- dividual socioeconomic outcomes. We do not come, wealth, and so on) in the United States advance new empirical research but rather a have reached levels not observed for almost a framing of the issues that will be sufficiently century. We believe that a corresponding evo- robust and comprehensive to permit integra- lution of geographic inequalities in socioeco- tion of all the papers in this issue as illustra- nomic, environmental, institutional, and po- tions and amplifications. Moreover, we hope litical domains both reflect and—more that our model will be useful in generating hy- importantly from our perspective—contribute potheses and thereby stimulating further re- to these inequalities across individuals.1 It is search on this crucial topic. this belief that motivated the Russell Sage In overview, our conceptual model con- Foundation to devote an issue of RSF: The Rus- tends that the variations in geographic context sell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sci- across multiple scales (neighborhood, jurisdic- ences to this topic. tion, metropolitan region)—what we call spa- Our primary purpose in this introductory tial opportunity structure—affects the socioeco- article is to develop a holistic, multilevel con- nomic outcomes that individuals can achieve ceptual model for comprehending how space in two ways by altering the payoffs that will be can be considered a foundation of U.S. socio- gained from the attributes individuals have economic inequality. Our secondary aim is to during any given period and the bundle of at- provide a synthetic review of the evidence on tributes that individuals will acquire (both pas- various dimensions of inequality of opportu- sively and actively) during their lifetimes. nity and outcomes in America, and the empir- In the first mechanism, the spatial oppor- ical scholarly literature that provides plausibly tunity structure serves as a mediating factor, George Galster is Clarence Hilberry Professor of Urban Affairs at Wayne State University.Patrick Sharkey is professor of sociology at New York University. © 2017 Russell Sage Foundation. Galster, George, and Patrick Sharkey. 2017. “Spatial Foundations of Inequality: A Conceptual Model and Empirical Overview.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 3(2): 1–33. DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2017.3.2.01. The authors thank Maren Toft for her comments on an earlier draft and Sylvia Tatman-Burruss for research assistance. Participants at the Russell Sage Foundation conference “Spatial Foundations of Inequality” and two anonymous reviewers provided valuable feedback on early drafts of this article. Direct correspondence to: George Galster at [email protected], Department of Urban Stud- ies and Planning, Room 3198, Faculty- Administration Building, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202; and Patrick Sharkey at [email protected], Department of Sociology, New York University, 295 Lafayette St., Room 4102, New York, NY 10012. 1. We are not the first to make such claims, of course. A similar theme is advanced in numerous seminal works (for example, Wilson 1987; Jencks and Mayer 1990; Brooks- Gunn et al. 1993; Briggs 1995; Brooks- Gunn, Duncan, and Aber 1997). 2 sPatial foundations of inequality translating a given bundle of individual attri- tion across space of different segments of the butes into achieved status depending on geog- population as classified by racial- ethnic back- raphy of the individual’s residence, work, and ground and income, economic opportunities, routine activity spaces. In the second mecha- environmental hazards, and violence. nism, the spatial opportunity structure serves as a modifying factor affecting the bundle of Segregation by Economic Status and attributes that individuals develop over time Race- Ethnicity in three ways. First, it directly influences the Trends in household income and wealth in- attributes over which individuals may exercise equality, which have been well documented in little or no volition, such as exposure to envi- academic work and the popular press, are mir- ronmental pollutants or violence. Second, it rored by trends in the degree to which low- and directly influences the attributes over which high- income families live apart from each they exercise considerable volition by shaping other, as measured by economic segregation what they perceive is the most desirable, fea- (Bischoff and Reardon 2014; Jargowsky 1996, sible option. It does so by influencing what in- 2003, 2015; Reardon and Bischoff 2011, 2016; formation about the individual’s options is Watson 2009). No matter how economic segre- provided, what the information objectively in- gation is measured, trends show steady growth dicates about payoffs from these options, and in the degree of segregation by income since how the individual subjectively evaluates the the 1970s. Sean Reardon and Kendra Bischoff information. These decisions early in life lead (2016) use a straightforward measure of the people into various path- dependent trajecto- proportion of families living in neighborhoods ries of achieved socioeconomic status and sub- that have median income at least 50 percent sequent life decisions, in cumulatively rein- above or 50 percent below the metropolitan forcing processes that can stretch across area median to document changes in the de- lifetimes and generations. Third, in the case of gree to which American families have begun children and youth, the spatial opportunity to sort into separate communities stratified by structure indirectly influences their attributes economic status. They find that, in 1970, about through induced changes in the resources, be- 15 percent lived in neighborhoods that were haviors, and attitudes of their caregivers. either extremely affluent or extremely poor. By 2012, that figure had risen to 34 percent. InequalItIes In the spatIal Although the growth of affluent neighbor- OppOrtunIty structure hoods is an important contributor to the rise The first basic claim that motivates this issue of economic segregation (Reardon and Bischoff is that various dimensions of inequality are or- 2011), much of the concern about the issue ganized in space. The spatial organization of stems from the long- term rise of concentrated inequality is, in part, simply a manifestation poverty. Paul Jargowsky (2003, 2015) docu- of inequality occurring at the level of individu- ments trends in the proportion of all Ameri- als, families, and groups that is mapped on to cans and poor Americans living in neighbor- spaces. However, spatial inequality also is due hoods with a poverty rate of 40 percent or to intentional efforts to organize physical greater in a series of reports, showing substan- space in ways that maintain or reinforce in- tial growth in concentrated poverty from 1970 equality (Dreier, Mollenkopf, and Swanstrom to 1990, a decline of high- poverty neighbor- 2001). As a result of both sets of processes, vari- hoods in the 1990s, and a subsequent increase ation is tremendous in economic status, labor in concentrated poverty from 2000 to the most market opportunities, core institutions such recent years in which data were available (from as schools, environmental hazards, and social 2009 through 2013). Since 2000, the number of networks across city blocks, neighborhoods, extreme poverty neighborhoods has risen by cities and towns, metropolitan areas, and re- more than 75 percent and the number of Amer- gions. We begin with a descriptive portrait of icans living in such neighborhoods by more several different dimensions of the spatial op- than 90 percent, from 7.2 million to 13.8 mil- portunity structure, focusing on the distribu- lion (Jargowsky 2015). rsf: the russell sage foundation journal of the social sciences an em Pirical overview 3 Economic inequality in American neighbor- ments than other groups even after account- hoods overlaps with persistent racial and eth- ing for group differences in economic status. nic inequality. Residential segregation of Afri- The gaps are most notable when blacks and can Americans from Anglo Americans is most whites are compared. In all urban areas commonly measured two ways: the dissimilar- across the country, Patrick Sharkey (2014) ity index, which captures the comparative finds that black families with household in- evenness of the overall distribution of two ra- come of $100,000 or more live in and are sur- cial or ethnic groups across the neighborhoods rounded by neighborhoods with higher levels of a city or metropolitan area, and the isolation of disadvantage than white families with in- index, which captures the degree to which come of $30,000 or less (see also Logan 2011; members of a particular racial or ethnic group Reardon, Fox, and Townsend 2015). live in neighborhoods occupied by members of the same group.2 According to both mea- Schools and School Districts sures, the segregation of blacks from whites The research described in the previous section continues to be extremely high in many urban indicates that inequality in residential environ- areas, although black- white segregation has ments (especially in its economic composi- declined steadily since 1970 (Glaeser and Vig- tion) has been growing for all American fami- dor 2012; Logan and Stults 2011; Logan, Stults, lies. These
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Moving to Inequality: Neighborhood Effects and Experiments Meet Social Structure1
    Moving to Inequality: Neighborhood Effects and Experiments Meet Social Structure1 Robert J. Sampson Harvard University The Moving to Opportunity (MTO) housing experiment has proven to be an important intervention not just in the lives of the poor, but in social science theories of neighborhood effects. Competing causal claims have been the subject of considerable disagreement, culmi- nating in the debate between Clampet-Lundquist and Massey and Ludwig et al. in this issue. This article assesses the debate by clar- ifying analytically distinct questions posed by neighborhood-level theories, reconceptualizing selection bias as a fundamental social process worthy of study in its own right rather than a statistical nuisance, and reconsidering the scientific method of experimenta- tion, and hence causality, in the social world of the city. The author also analyzes MTO and independent survey data from Chicago to examine trajectories of residential attainment. Although MTO pro- vides crucial leverage for estimating neighborhood effects on indi- viduals, as proponents rightly claim, this study demonstrates the implications imposed by a stratified urban structure and how MTO simultaneously provides a new window on the social reproduction of concentrated inequality. Contemporary wisdom traces the idea of neighborhood effects to William Julius Wilson’s justly lauded book, The Truly Disadvantaged (1987). Since its publication, a veritable explosion of work has emerged, much of it attempting to test the hypothesis that living in a neighborhood of con- 1 I am indebted to Corina Graif for superb research assistance and to Patrick Sharkey for his collaborative work on neighborhood selection. They both provided incisive comments as well, as did Nicholas Christakis, Steve Raudenbush, Bruce Western, P.-O.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crime and Society Issue
    FALL 2020 THE CRIME AND SOCIETY ISSUE Can Academics Such as Paul Butler and Patrick Sharkey Point Us to Better Communities? Michael O’Hear’s Symposium on Violent Crime and Recidivism Bringing Baseless Charges— Darryl Brown’s Counterintuitive Proposal for Progress ALSO INSIDE David Papke on Law and Literature A Blog Recipe Remembering Professor Kossow Princeton’s Professor Georgetown’s Professor 1 MARQUETTE LAWYER FALL 2020 Patrick Sharkey Paul Butler FROM THE DEAN Bringing the National Academy to Milwaukee—and Sending It Back Out On occasion, we have characterized the work of Renowned experts such as Professors Butler and Sharkey Marquette University Law School as bringing the world and the others whom we bring “here” do not claim to have to Milwaukee. We have not meant this as an altogether charted an altogether-clear (let alone easy) path to a better unique claim. For more than a century, local newspapers future for our communities, but we believe that their ideas have brought the daily world here, as have, for decades, and suggestions can advance the discussion in Milwaukee broadcast services and, most recently, the internet. And and elsewhere about finding that better future. many Milwaukee-based businesses, nonprofits, and So we continue to work at bringing the world here, organizations are world-class and world-engaged. even as we pursue other missions. To reverse the phrasing Yet Marquette Law School does some things in this and thereby to state another truth, we bring Wisconsin regard especially well. For example, in 2019 (pre-COVID to the world in issues of this magazine and elsewhere, being the point), about half of our first-year students had not least in the persons of those Marquette lawyers been permanent residents of other states before coming who practice throughout the United States and in many to Milwaukee for law school.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharkey Sampson 2010[2]
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Harvard University - DASH Destination Effects: Residential Mobility and Trajectories of Adolescent Violence in a Stratified Metropolis The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Sharkey, Patrick, and Robert J. Sampson. 2010. "Destination Citation Effects: Residential Mobility and Trajectories of Adolescent Violence in a Stratified Metropolis." Criminology 48 (3) (August 17): 639-681. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00198.x. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00198.x. Published Version doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00198.x Accessed April 17, 2018 4:28:53 PM EDT Citable Link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11324033 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University's DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP (Article begins on next page) NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Criminology. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 February 19. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptPublished NIH-PA Author Manuscript in final edited NIH-PA Author Manuscript form as: Criminology. 2010 August 17; 48(3): 639–681. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00198.x. DESTINATION EFFECTS: RESIDENTIAL MOBILITY AND TRAJECTORIES OF ADOLESCENT VIOLENCE IN A STRATIFIED METROPOLIS Patrick Sharkey and New York University Department of Sociology, Puck Building, 295 Lafayette St. New York, NY 10012 [email protected] (212) 998-8366 Robert J.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaner Usmani September 2018
    Adaner Usmani September 2018 Contact Watson Institute (646) 705-8673 Information Brown University [email protected] 111 Thayer Street http://adanerusmani.weebly.com Providence, RI 02912 Research Labor and Social Movements Interests Crime and Incarceration Quantitative and Computational Methods Academic Brown University Employment Postdoctoral Fellow, 2017-2019 Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs Education New York University Ph.D., Sociology, 2017 Essays on the Rise and Fall of Labor Committee: Vivek Chibber (chair), Patrick Sharkey, Jeff Goodwin Readers: Mike Hout, Paul DiMaggio M.A., Sociology, 2012 Harvard University B.A., in Social Studies, 2008 magna cum laude Phi Beta Kappa Papers ``Democracy and the Class Struggle.'' American Journal of Sociology 124(3):1-41 (November 2018) \bullet Honorable Mention, Reinhard Bendix Student Paper Award ``The Long March to Democracy: Contentious Mobilization and Deep Democracy'', with Mohammad Ali Kadivar and Benjamin H. Bradlow. (Invitation to revise and resubmit at Social Forces) ``Humans in the Loop: Priors and Missingness on the Road to Prediction'', with Anna Filippova, Connor Gilroy, Ridhi Kashyap, Antije Kirchner, Allie Morgan, Kivan Polimis, and Tong Wang (Conditionally accepted at Socius) ``The Rise and Fall of Labor'' Working Papers ``The Racial Politics of the Punitive Turn'', with John Clegg Adaner Usmani ``Job Loss and Incarceration: Local Labor Market Effects of a Natural Experiment'', with John Clegg and Jacob Kang-Brown Other ``Did Liberals Give Us Mass Incarceration?''. Catalyst: A Journal of Theory and Publications Strategy 1(3):169-183 (Fall 2017) ``Social Movements,'' with Jeff Goodwin, in American Governance, edited by Stephen Schechter, Thomas S. Vontz, Thomas A.
    [Show full text]
  • Patrick Sharkey
    Patrick Sharkey New York University Phone: (212) 998-8366 Department of Sociology Fax: (212) 995-4140 The Puck Building Email: [email protected] 295 Lafayette Street, Fourth Floor Homepage: http://patricksharkey.net New York, NY 10012 Education Ph.D. Sociology and Social Policy, Harvard University, 2002-2007. Dissertation: “The Enduring Inequality of Race and Place: Racial Inequality in the Neighborhood Environment over the Life Course and across Generations.” Committee: Robert J. Sampson (chair), William Julius Wilson, Christopher Winship. B.A. Public Policy and American Institutions, Brown University, 1996-2000. Employment New York University, Department of Sociology. Associate Professor of Sociology, 2012-Present. Scientific Director, “Crime Lab New York City.” 2014- Director (Interim), Institute for Human Development and Social Change, 2015-2016. Associate Director, Institute for Human Development and Social Change. NYU, 2014-2015. Assistant Professor of Sociology, 2009-2012. Affiliated Faculty, Robert F. Wagner School for Public Service, NYU, 2009-Present. Robert Wood Johnson Health and Society Scholars Program, Columbia University. Postdoctoral Scholar, 2007-2009. The Urban Institute, Washington DC. Research Assistant, Labor and Social Policy Center, 2000-2002. Publications Book Sharkey, Patrick. 2013. Stuck in Place: Urban Neighborhoods and the End of Progress toward Racial Equality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Winner of the Robert E. Park Book Award, Community and Urban Sociology Section of the American Socio- logical Association, 2015. Winner of the Otis Dudley Duncan Book Award, Population Section of the American Sociological Association, 2014. Winner of the Mirra Komarovsky Book Award, Eastern Sociological Society, 2013. Winner of The American Publishers Award for Professional and Scholarly Excellence (PROSE Award) in Sociology and Social Work, 2013 Patrick Sharkey 2 Edited volume Galster, George and Patrick Sharkey, editors.
    [Show full text]
  • Neighborhoods, Cities, and Economic Mobility (Draft) Patrick Sharkey New
    Neighborhoods, Cities, and Economic Mobility (draft) Patrick Sharkey New York University October 10, 2014 Although the literature on intergenerational economic mobility in the United States has advanced considerably over time, less progress has been made in explaining the mechanisms leading to the persistence of economic status across generations. Empirical research designed to explain similarities in economic status across generations has focused primary attention on characteristics of individuals or families. This article expands the focus beyond the individual and the family to consider features of communities and cities. This focus on the spatial foundations of economic mobility in the United States is based on two basic claims (Sharkey and Faber 2014). The first claim is that systems of stratification are organized, in part, along spatial lines. This claim is uncontroversial. The spatial organization of American social, economic, and political life is reflected in zoning decisions, political districts, school catchment areas, siting of environmental hazards, the boundaries of police precincts, and the location decisions of public institutions and private firms. The second claim is that the spatial organization of America’s stratification system affects the life chances, and the economic trajectories, of different segments of the population in ways that maintain, and reinforce, inequality. This claim has been the subject of more vigorous debate, and the empirical evidence that has been generated to support or refute this claim is
    [Show full text]
  • Residential Mobility and Its Implications for Economic Mobility in the United States
    T R EPO R 21 e No. 2 November 2015 2 November No. WHEN MOVING MATTERS Residential and Economic Mobility Trends in America, 1880–2010 Scott Winship Senior Fellow, Manhattan Institute AT THE MANHATTAN INSTITUTE Published by the Manhattan Institute EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In recent years, observers across America’s political spectrum have expressed concern over declining residential mobility and its implications for economic mobility in the United States. There is a widespread belief that Ameri- cans’ economic mobility has declined and that Americans are also less likely to “move to opportunity” than in the past. These two assertions have been linked to argue that falling residential mobility is an important factor behind diminished economic opportunity in America. The reality is more complicated. The bulk of research on economic mobility—focused on earnings, income, occupa- tion, and education—suggests very little change since at least the mid-twentieth century. While the share of Ameri- cans having moved in the previous year has fallen since the 1970s, this paper finds that other types of residential mobility are now as high as they have been in 100 years or more. The author’s extensive analysis of different data sources—12 decennial censuses, extending back to the nine- teenth century; the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey; and two panels from the Labor Department’s National Longitudinal Surveys—confirms a long-standing connection between residential mobility and economic outcomes; but this connection is much stronger when focusing on the kinds of residential mobility that have not declined—moves between birth and adulthood (and most likely between adolescence and adulthood) and moves across state boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaner Usmani: Curriculum Vitae
    Adaner Usmani May 2017 Contact Department of Sociology (646) 705-8673 Information New York University [email protected] 295 Lafayette Street http://adanerusmani.weebly.com New York, NY 10012 Research Comparative and Historical Sociology Interests Labor and Social Movements Crime and Incarceration Quantitative Methods Academic Brown University Employment Postdoctoral Fellow, 2017-2019 Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs Education New York University Ph.D. in Sociology, May 2017 Harvard University B.A. in Social Studies, May 2008 magna cum laude Phi Beta Kappa Papers ``Democracy and the Class Struggle.'' Invitation to revise and resubmit atthe American Journal of Sociology. \bullet Honorable Mention, Reinhard Bendix Student Paper Award ``Social Movements,'' with Jeff Goodwin, in American Governance, edited by Stephen Schechter, Thomas S. Vontz, Thomas A. Birkland, Mark A. Graber, and John J. Patrick. Vol. 5. Farmington Hills, MI: Macmillan Reference USA, 2016. ``The Abject Condition of Labor in Pakistan,'' with Kamal A. Munir and Natalya Naqvi. Inter- national Labor and Working-Class History Vol 87 (Spring 2015). ``The Indian State and the Capitalist Class'', with Vivek Chibber, in The Routledge Handbook on Indian Politics, Atul Kohli and Prerna Singh eds., London: Routledge, 2013. Awards 2016/17 New York University Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Dean’s Dissertation Fellowship 2016 Honorable Mention, Reinhard Bendix Student Paper Award, Comparative Historical Sociology Section of the American Sociological Association 2009
    [Show full text]
  • Shamus Rahman Khan Columbia University, Department of Sociology 609 Knox Hall, 606 West 122Nd Street, New York, NY 10027 Email [email protected]
    Updated January 1, 2021 Shamus Rahman Khan Columbia University, Department of Sociology 609 Knox Hall, 606 West 122nd Street, New York, NY 10027 Email [email protected]. Office: +1 212 854 2489 ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2021- Professor, Princeton University, Department of Sociology and Program in American Studies 2017 Professor, Columbia University, Department of Sociology Executive Committee: Institute for Women, Gender, and Sexuality Executive Committee: American Studies Core Faculty: Columbia Population Research Center, Mailman School of Public Health 2014 Associate Professor with tenure, Columbia University, Department of Sociology 2008 Assistant Professor, Columbia University, Department of Sociology 2007 Lecturer with the rank of Assistant Professor, Columbia University, Department of Sociology EDUCATION 2008 PhD, Sociology. University of Wisconsin-Madison 2006 M.S., Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison 2000 B.A., Sociology, Haverford College GRANTS 2020- “Doctoral Dissertation Research: Forgive us Our Debts: Market Expansion, Ethno-Racial Boundaries, and the Democratization of Bankruptcy.” National Science Foundation, Nicholas Pang, Doctoral Dissertation Candidate, under direction, $27,650. 2019- “Doctoral Dissertation Research: Identity Theft Remediation and the Production of Economic Security,” National Science Foundation, Jordan Brensinger, Doctoral Dissertation Candidate, under direction, $32,356. 2017- “New York City Inequality Network,” WT Grant Foundation, $50,000, Co-Principal Investigator 2017- “Center for a Life-course
    [Show full text]
  • Jacob William Faber, Phd July 2020
    Jacob William Faber, PhD July 2020 New York University | NYU Robert F. Wagner School of Public Service 295 Lafayette St. | Third Floor | New York, NY 10012 [email protected] | www.JacobFaber.com Employment New York University Robert F. Wagner School of Public Service 2020-Present Associate Professor of Sociology and Public Service 2016-2019 Assistant Professor of Sociology and Public Service New York University Department of Sociology 2020-Present Associate Professor of Sociology 2018-2019 Associated Faculty Princeton University Department of Sociology 2015-2017 Postdoctoral Research Associate The Center for Social Inclusion (Now called Race Forward) 2006-2010 Senior Researcher Education 2015 New York University, PhD, Sociology Dissertation: “In Foreclosure’s Wake: The Geography and Consequences of the Foreclosure Crisis” Committee: Ingrid Gould Ellen, Michael Hout, Patrick Sharkey (Chair) 2013 New York University, MA, Sociology 2006 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MS, Technology and Policy 2006 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MS, Urban Studies & Planning 2004 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, BS, Management Science Peer reviewed publications (* student collaborator) Faber, Jacob W. Forthcoming. “We Built This: Consequences of New Deal Era intervention in America's racial geography.” American Sociological Review. Faber, Jacob W. Forthcoming. “Contemporary Echoes of Segregationist Policy: Spatial Marking and the Persistence of Inequality.” Urban Studies. Faber, Jacob W. and Terri Friedline. 2020. “The Racialized Costs of “Traditional” Banking in Segregated America: Evidence from Entry-Level Checking Accounts.” Race and Social Problems. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-020-09296-y) Faber, Jacob W. 2019. “Segregation and the cost of money: Race, poverty, and the prevalence of alternative financial institutions.” Social Forces 98(2): 819–848.
    [Show full text]
  • Neighborhoods Black-White Mobility
    NEIGHBORHOODS AND THE BLACK-WHITE MOBILITY GAP BY PATRICK SHARKEY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Patrick Sharkey is an Assistant Professor of Sociology at New York University and is a Faculty Affiliate at NYU’s Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service. His research focuses on the persistence of racial inequality in American neighborhoods in the post-civil rights era and the consequences of life in disadvantaged environments as experienced over generations of African-American families. The author gives special thanks to Scott Winship at the Economic Mobility Project who provided thoughtful feedback, edits, ideas, and suggestions throughout this project. Christopher Jencks also provided insightful comments and suggestions, many of which were implemented in the final analysis. Additional thanks go to Erin Currier, Harry Holzer, Ianna Kachoris, Marvin Kosters, Sara McLanahan and Robert Rector for their helpful comments on the research, and to Dalton Conley, Robert Sampson, Florencia Torche, William Julius Wilson, and Christopher Winship for feedback on previous research that is closely related to the work presented here. Lastly, the author also thanks Donna Nordquist at the Institute for Social Research at Michigan for her assistance with the PSID geocode data. Editorial assistance was provided by Ellen Wert, and design expertise by Carole Goodman of Do Good Design. All Economic Mobility Project materials are reviewed by members of the Principals’ Group and guided with input of the project’s Advisory Board (see back cover). The views expressed
    [Show full text]
  • Unpacking Neighborhood Influences on Education Outcomes: Setting the Stage for Future Research
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES UNPACKING NEIGHBORHOOD INFLUENCES ON EDUCATION OUTCOMES: SETTING THE STAGE FOR FUTURE RESEARCH David J. Harding Lisa Gennetian Christopher Winship Lisa Sanbonmatsu Jeffrey R. Kling Working Paper 16055 http://www.nber.org/papers/w16055 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 June 2010 The views expressed here are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as those of the Congressional Budget Office or the National Bureau of Economic Research. We thank Greg Duncan, Richard Murnane, Rebecca Blank, Robert Sampson, Steve Raudenbush, Patrick Sharkey, Susan Clampet-Lundquist, Tama Leventhal, Larry Katz, Robert Moffitt, and participants at the Social Inequality and Educational Disadvantage conferences and the University of Michigan Robert Wood Johnson Health Policy Seminar for helpful comments on previous versions of this paper. This paper was prepared for Social Inequality and Educational Disadvantage, edited by Greg Duncan and Richard Murnane, Russell Sage Foundation Press. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2010 by David J. Harding, Lisa Gennetian, Christopher Winship, Lisa Sanbonmatsu, and Jeffrey R. Kling. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Unpacking Neighborhood Influences on Education Outcomes: Setting the Stage for Future Research David J. Harding, Lisa Gennetian, Christopher Winship, Lisa Sanbonmatsu, and Jeffrey R. Kling NBER Working Paper No. 16055 June 2010 JEL No.
    [Show full text]