Economic Diplomacy and Connectivity What Role for the OSCE?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Commercial Attaché, Embassy of Mexico the Embassy of Ireland In
Commercial Attaché, Embassy of Mexico The Embassy of Ireland in Mexico is recruiting a Commercial Attaché who will report to the Deputy Head of Mission responsible for trade and economic promotion. This is a new role and the successful candidate will be offered a one year contract, renewable for a maximum of two additional years. The key objective for the role of the Commercial attaché will be to promote Ireland’s economic interests in Mexico and to facilitate and support Irish companies wishing to enter or expand in the Mexican market, principally in the areas of agribusiness (particularly dairy), ICT (particularly software services for the telecoms industry and digital media), financial services and education. Role Profile Specifically, the new Commercial Attaché will: Cooperate with strategic partners in Mexico to identify and capture economic opportunities for Irish companies, including drafting market opportunity assessments; Expand the Embassy contact network in the agribusiness, ICT, financial services and education sectors and in other sectors as identified by the Embassy as priorities; Consolidate and expand the embassy’s information on Irish companies operating in the Mexican market or seeking to enter the market, as well as maintaining a comprehensive contacts database and networking with key Irish business people; Liaise with and support the development of the recently established Irish-Mexican Chamber of Commerce and work with the Chamber, ProMéxico, COMCE and other Mexican business organisations, as well as Irish state -
Responsible Business Conduct and Economic Diplomacy Tools
Responsible business conduct and economic diplomacy tools June 2017 mneguidelines.oecd.org This concept note was prepared for the session on promoting responsible business conduct (RBC) through economic diplomacy tools at the Roundtable for Policy Makers that took place on 28 June 2017 within the framework of the OECD Global Forum on Responsible Business Conduct. It sets a basis for reflection and discussion on how RBC standards can be embedded in economic diplomacy. Economic diplomacy refers to government services and support provided to business in foreign markets. This can take the form of financial support such as export credits, investment guarantees and direct lending, but can also include other public services such as trade missions, capacity building activities and access to information and networks through embassies. These tools are not only instrumental to promote foreign trade and investment, but they can also be powerful levers for governments to guide corporate behaviour and support best practice on responsible business conduct (RBC). Although far from mainstream, some governments have recognised this potential and are using economic diplomacy to create incentives for business to behave responsibly. There are several reasons for this. First, governments as economic actors should not contribute to adverse impacts of business operations. Second, although trade and investment promotion is a competitive field among countries, it is in governments' interests to create a level playing field and ensure that companies are subject to fair competition and do not profit from public services with irresponsible practices. Third, insufficient attention to corporate conduct by national companies in foreign markets can negatively affect the country's image abroad. -
Economic Diplomacy in Africa: the Impact of Regional Integration Versus Bilateral Diplomacy On
MWP 2016/18 Max Weber Programme Economic Diplomacy in Africa: The Impact of Regional Integration versus Bilateral Diplomacy on Bilateral Trade Author Sylvanus Author Kwaku and Afesorgbor Author Author European University Institute Max Weber Programme Economic Diplomacy in Africa: The Impact of Regional Integration versus Bilateral Diplomacy on Bilateral Trade Sylvanus Kwaku Afesorgbor EUI Working Paper MWP 2016/18 This text may be downloaded for personal research purposes only. Any additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copy or electronically, requires the consent of the author(s), editor(s). If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the working paper or other series, the year, and the publisher. ISSN 1830-7728 © Sylvanus Kwaku Afesorgbor, 2016 Printed in Italy European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy www.eui.eu cadmus.eui.eu Abstract The paper examines the impact of two main instruments of economic diplomacy regional integration and commercial diplomacy on export flows among African states. We test whether there is any evidence of a trade-off or complementary interaction between these two instruments in trade facilitation. We compare the effects of these two instruments of economic diplomacy on bilateral trade by employing a gravity model for 45 African states over the period 1980-2005. The results show that bilateral diplomatic exchange is a relatively more significant determinant of bilateral exports among African states compared to regional integration. We also find a nuanced interaction between these two instruments of economic diplomacy: the trade-stimulating effect of diplomatic exchange is less pronounced among African countries that shared membership of the same regional bloc. -
Genocides Andconflicts
0 1 Genocides and Conflicts in the 20th and 21st Centuries Preface This book provides summaries of some of the mass atrocities that have occurred in the last hundred years. We have intentionally included conflicts that often are not studied in courses about genocide. We encourage readers to learn about these events for two reasons: first, when knowledge of these atrocities is not part of our shared history and memory, those who suffered, and their once- vibrant cultures and communities, are made invisible yet again. Second, it is important for us to realize the breadth of genocides across time and place. ‘Never again’ has come to mean ‘over and over again.’ Perhaps if we can recognize that genocide is a wide-ranging and repetitive scourge on the planet, we can someday reach a world without genocide. Thanks go to Jacob Simpson, Research and Advocacy Associate, and Amalie Wilkinson, Research Intern, for their work on this book. 2 Table of Contents Native Americans, 1492-Present ............................................................................................ 3 Namibia, 1904-1907 ............................................................................................................... 5 The Armenian Genocide, 1915-1923 ....................................................................................... 7 The Ottoman Christian Genocide, 1915-23 ..............................................................................9 The Holodomor, 1932-1933................................................................................................. -
Toolkit on Police Integrity New Chapter 000*:Layout 1 2/24/12 12:01 PM Page 2
Toolkit_cover 2/22/12 6:30 PM Page 1 Toolkit www.dcaf.ch on Police Integrity new_chapter_000*:Layout 1 2/24/12 12:01 PM Page 1 Toolkit on Police Integrity new_chapter_000*:Layout 1 2/24/12 12:01 PM Page 2 DCAF The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) is an international foundation whose mission is to assist the international community in pursuing good governance and reform of the security sector. The Centre develops and promotes norms and standards, conducts tailored policy research, identifies good practices and recommendations to promote democratic security sector governance, and provides in-country advisory support and practical assistance programmes. DCAF gratefully acknowledges the support of the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the production of the Toolkit. The views expressed are those of the authors alone and do not in any way reflect the views of the institutions referred to or represented within this Toolkit. Cover pictures (top to bottom, left to right): © OSCE/Mikhail Evstafiev © 2007 Joi Ito. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license © Danish Police (politi.dk) © 2009 Beijing Patrol. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license © KEYSTONE/AP Photo/Schalk van Zuydam © UN Photo/Christopher Herwig ©DCAF, 2012 All rights reserved. ISBN 978-92-9222-190-4 Design, layout and printing: Valeur, Slovak Republic Published by DCAF (Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces) PO Box 1360 1211 Geneva 1 Switzerland www.dcaf.ch new_chapter_000*:Layout 1 2/24/12 12:01 PM Page 3 Acknowledgements Pierre Aepli, Senior Police Advisor DCAF (until March 2011) initiated the project, developed the concept and coordinated the writing of the nine chapters of the toolkit. -
Economic Diplomacy As an Instrument of Progress and Promotion of the Republic of Croatia
Economic diplomacy as an instrument of progress and promotion of the Republic of Croatia Babić, Marko Doctoral thesis / Disertacija 2019 Degree Grantor / Ustanova koja je dodijelila akademski / stručni stupanj: University of Zadar / Sveučilište u Zadru Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:162:497993 Rights / Prava: In copyright Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-10-07 Repository / Repozitorij: University of Zadar Institutional Repository of evaluation works SVEUČILIŠTE U ZADRU i LIBERTAS MEĐUNARODNO SVEUČILIŠTE ZAJEDNIČKI POSLIJEDIPLOMSKI SVEUČILIŠNI STUDIJ MEĐUNARODNI ODNOSI Marko Babić ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROGRESS AND PROMOTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA Doktorski rad Zadar; Zagreb, 2019. SVEUČILIŠTE U ZADRU i LIBERTAS MEĐUNARODNO SVEUČILIŠTE ZAJEDNIČKI POSLIJEDIPLOMSKI SVEUČILIŠNI STUDIJ MEĐUNARODNI ODNOSI Marko Babić ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROGRESS AND PROMOTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA Doktorski rad Mentor Viši znanstveni suradnik, Miomir Žužul, dr.sc. Zadar; Zagreb, 2019. UNIVERSITY OF ZADAR BASIC DOCUMENTATION CARD I. Author and study Name and surname: Marko Babić Name of the study programme: Joint postgraduate doctoral study International Relations Mentor: Senior scientific associate Miomir Žužul, PhD Date of the defence: 10 July 2019 Scientific area and field in which the PhD is obtained: social sciences, interdisciplinary social sciences II. Doctoral dissertation Title: Economic diplomacy as an instrument of progress and promotion of the Republic of Croatia UDC mark: 339.9:327>(497.5) Number of pages: 274 Number of pictures/graphical representations/tables: 8/ 15/ 25 Number of notes: 355 Number of used bibliographic units and sources: 148 Number of appendices: 4 Language of the doctoral dissertation: English III. -
Enhancing Co-Operation to Prevent Trafficking in Human Beings in the Mediterranean Region Isbn: 978-92-9234-442-9
Offi ce of the Special Representative and Co-ordinator for Combating Traffi cking in Human Beings ENHANCING CO-OPERATION TO PREVENT TRAFFICKING IN HUMAN BEINGS IN THE MEDITERRANEAN REGION ISBN: 978-92-9234-442-9 Published by the OSCE Offi ce of the Special Representative and Co-ordinator for Combating Traffi cking in Human Beings Wallnerstr. 6, 1010 Vienna, Austria Tel: + 43 1 51436 6664 Fax: + 43 1 51436 6299 email: [email protected] © 2013 OSCE/Offi ce of the Special Representative and Co-ordinator for Combating Traffi cking in Human Beings Copyright: “All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for educational and other non-commercial purposes, provided that any such reproduction is accompanied by an acknowledgement of the OSCE/Offi ce of the Special Representative and Co-ordinator for Combating Traffi cking in Human Beings as the source.” Design: Tina Feiertag, Vienna Illustration on cover: Mediterraneo (2007), Acrylic on raw canvas 40x50cm, by Adriano Parracciani Illustrations on page 11, 19, 35, 41, 49: Tempera on brick 10x10 cm by Adriano Parracciani Photos on page 8, 10, 14, 20, 21, 22, 23, 27, 33: Enrico Para/Camera dei Deputati Photo on page 8, 43: Alfred Kueppers Photos on page 4: OSCE/Mikhail Evstafi ev Photos on page 32: OSCE/Alberto Andreani Cite as: OSCE Offi ce of the Special Representative and Co-ordinator for Combating Traffi cking in Human Beings, Enhancing Co-operation to Prevent Traffi cking in Human Beings in the Mediterranean Region (November 2013). The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) is a pan-European security body whose 57 participating States span the geographical area from Vancouver to Vladivostok. -
Annual Report 2007 Annual Report Russia
UNITED STATES COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM Annual Report 2007 Annual Report RUSSIA UNITED STATES COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM Annual Report MAY 2007 U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom 800 North Capitol Street, NW Suite 790 Washington, DC 20002 202-523-3240 202-523-5020 (fax) www.uscirf.gov UNITED STATES COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM Commissioners Chair Felice D. Gaer Vice Chairs Michael Cromartie Dr. Elizabeth H. Prodromou Nina Shea Dr. Khaled M. Abou El Fadl Preeta D. Bansal Archbishop Charles J. Chaput Dr. Richard D. Land Bishop Ricardo Ramirez John V. Hanford, III, ex officio, non-voting member Executive Director Joseph R. Crapa UNITED STATES COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM Staff Tad Stahnke, Deputy Director for Policy David Dettoni, Deputy Director for Outreach Judith Ingram, Director of Communications Holly Smithson, Director of Government Affairs Carmelita Hines, Director of Administration Patricia Carley, Associate Director for Policy Angela Stephens, Assistant Communications Director Dwight Bashir, Senior Policy Analyst Catherine Cosman, Senior Policy Analyst Deborah DuCre, Receptionist Scott Flipse, Senior Policy Analyst Julia Kirby, Middle East Researcher Mindy Larmore, East Asia Researcher Tiffany Lynch, Research Assistant Jacqueline A. Mitchell, Executive Assistant Allison Salyer, Legislative Assistant Stephen R. Snow, Senior Policy Analyst Christopher Swift, Researcher UNITED STATES COMMIssION ON INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM Washington, DC, May 1, 2007 The PRESIDENT The White House DEAR MR. PRESIDENT: On behalf of the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom, I am transmitting to you the annual report, prepared in compliance with section 202(a)(2) of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998, 22 U.S.C. -
Economic Diplomacy
ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY Economic diplomacy deals with the nexus between power and wealth in international affairs. Economic diplomacy not only promotes the state’s prosperity but also, as occasion demands and opportunity permits, manipulates its foreign commercial and financial relations in support of its foreign policy – as in the case of sanctions against Iran. Accordingly, economic diplomacy is a major theme of the external relations of virtually all countries. At home, economic ministries, trade and investment promotion bodies, chambers of commerce, and of course foreign ministries, are all participants in economic work. Current trends include increasing collaboration between state and non-official agencies, and increased importance given to WTO issues, the negotiation of free trade and preferential trade agreements, and accords covering investments, double taxation avoidance, financial services and the like. Abroad, embassies, consulates, and trade offices handle economic diplomacy. The main focus is on promotion, to attract foreign business, investments, technology and tourists. Economic diplomacy connects closely with political, public and other segments of diplomatic work. This online course is practice-oriented, and aims at capacity development. By the end of this course, participants should be able to: Describe how economic diplomacy has evolved, and how it plays a key role in international affairs, connecting closely with domestic priorities and development objectives in states. Explain the role played by different actors, state and non-states, in the development of ‘whole of country’ policies, and how a good diplomatic system works with all the key stakeholders. Apply the learning to the running of a commercial or economic section, and to the manner in which commerce chambers of individual enterprises can work with the foreign ministry and with diplomatic missions in the commercial and economic arena. -
Dayton +20 Bosnia and Herzegovina Twenty Years on from the Dayton Peace Agreement
Issue 50 September 2015 Dayton +20 Bosnia and Herzegovina twenty years on from the Dayton Peace Agreement plus articles on: safe shelter, asylum adjudication, assisted voluntary return, resettled refugees, and the landscape of protection FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION ONLY Forced Migration Review issue 50 • www.fmreview.org/dayton20 Dayton +20 37 Interpretations of Annex 7: assessing the impact on non-returnees in the UK 4 Foreword: Addressing the legacy of violence Gayle Munro Valentin Inzko 39 The role of remote voting in encouraging return 5 Map of post-Dayton Bosnia and Herzegovina Djordje Stefanovic and Neophytos Loizides 6 Annex 7: why are we still discussing it? 42 Home after Dayton: IDPs in Sarajevo María del Pilar Valledor Álvarez Gruia Badescu 7 Political and social consequences of continuing 44 The compound effects of conflict and disaster displacement in Bosnia and Herzegovina displacement in Bosnia and Herzegovina Lana Pašić Wesli H Turner 9 Bosnia and Herzegovina 20 years on from Dayton 46 Prijedor: re-imagining the future Andrew Mayne Damir Mitrić and Sudbin Musić 12 Resolving a protracted refugee situation through 48 Mass evacuations: learning from the past a regional process Caelin Briggs Olga Mitrovic 49 Bosnia revisited: a retrospective on the legacy 16 Voices in displacement of the conflict Claudia Meyerhoefer Brad K Blitz 18 Property rights and reconstruction in the Bosnian return process General articles Inmaculada Serrano 21 Resolving protracted displacement through 52 Inconsistency in asylum appeal adjudication social housing -
Aid, Strategy and Australian Economic Diplomacy
Aid, Strategy and Australian Economic Diplomacy The Coalition government has embraced a more transactional foreign policy than its predecessor. Foreign Minister Julie Bishop has repeatedly explained how the concept of “economic diplomacy” will guide Australia’s international engagement. “Strong economic outcomes” are the priority; shared prosperity is the objective. Accordingly, the government repurposed Australia’s foreign aid program. Under Bishop’s “new aid paradigm”, Australia’s aid program exists: … to promote Australia’s national interests by contributing to sustainable economic growth and poverty reduction. Upon winning office, the Coalition also decided to integrate AusAID – Australia’s previously autonomous aid agency – into the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) to enable: … the aid and diplomatic arms of Australia’s international policy agenda to be more closely aligned. Given the government’s framing of Australia’s aid program as an investment, it is fair to evaluate its aid spending decisions on those terms. Repeated cuts At the macro level, the Coalition has moved to rapidly alter the balance of Australia’s foreign policy spending. The aid-to-defence spending ratio reached 20% toward the end of the previous Labor government. Following three successive cuts to the aid budget, that ratio is projected to halve, to around 10%, within the next two years. The largest of the three cuts was announced in December 2014, as a part of general budget savings in the Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook. These cuts, reflected in the 2015-16 budget, mean Australia’s aid budget has fallen to A$4 billion, down from a peak of $5.6 billion in 2012-13. -
TRANSFORMATION of ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY ROLE in the 21St CENTURY
Skoryk V.V. Sumy State University, Sumy Shkola V.Yu. Sumy State University, Sumy TRANSFORMATION OF ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY ROLE IN THE 21st CENTURY There can be no dispute the fact, that effective economic diplomacy helps to avoid global conflicts. Transformation of view on economic diplomacy as on the non-military tools for conflict management and prevention (including „preventive diplomacy‟ and „mediation‟) defines it broader political context. In J.S. Nielsen‟s article economic diplomacy is regarded as “policy decisions aiming at promoting business interests for both state and non-state actors through governmental channels. All government agencies that have economic mandates and operate internationally are players in economic diplomacy. Likewise, non-state actors that are engaged in economic activities internationally are also players in economic diplomacy” [1]. It should be noted this definition does not completely reveal its essence. Economic diplomats promote not only business interests, but national interest, in particular, foreign policy goals of country in the international arena, peaceful resolving of conflicts and ways in finding of increasing partners and many other mechanisms to avoiding conflicts. In researches of Lyashenko O.M. and Boyko Z.M. [2] economic diplomacy is considered as an effective instrument in international economic relations for the systematic promotion of national economic interests countries in overseas markets. Other scientists, in particular [3], adhere to the same position highlighting two levels of economic diplomacy: macroeconomic and microeconomic. Such scientists as Lyashenko О. and Boyko Z. (2010) [2], Chaziza M. (2019) [4], Baranowski S., Covert L., Gordon B., Jobs R., Noack, C., Rosenbaum A., Scott B.