DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of the Humanities in Norway

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation of the Humanities in Norway Evaluation of the Humanities in Norway Report from Panel 5 – Archaeology, History and Cultural Studies Evaluation Division for Science Evaluation of the Humanities in Norway Report from Panel 5 – Archaeology, History and Cultural Studies Evaluation Division for Science © The Research Council of Norway 2017 The Research Council of Norway Visiting address: Drammensveien 288 P.O.Box 564 NO-1327 Lysaker Telephone: +47 22 03 70 00 [email protected] www.rcn.no The report can be ordered and downloaded at www.forskningsradet.no/publikasjoner Graphic design cover: Melkeveien designkontor AS Photos: Shutterstock Oslo, juni 2017 ISBN 978-82-12-03610-9 (pdf) 2 Contents Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 5 1 On the evaluation ...................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Terms of Reference ............................................................................................................ 8 1.2 The evaluation panels ........................................................................................................ 9 1.3 Methods and Limitations .................................................................................................. 11 1.3.1 Organisation of the evaluation ................................................................................... 11 1.3.2 The data available to the panels ............................................................................... 12 1.3.3 Criteria used during the evaluations .......................................................................... 13 1.3.4 Limitations .................................................................................................................. 14 1.4 Those evaluated ............................................................................................................... 16 2 Assessment at the national level ............................................................................................ 18 2.1 General observations ....................................................................................................... 18 2.2 History ............................................................................................................................... 21 2.3 Archaeology ...................................................................................................................... 22 2.4 Cultural studies ................................................................................................................. 23 3 Assessment of institutions ...................................................................................................... 24 3.1 Nordland University (UiN) ................................................................................................. 24 3.2 Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Humanities (NTNUHF) ... 27 3.3 University of Bergen, Faculty of Humanities (UiBHF) ...................................................... 31 3.4 University of Oslo, Faculty of Humanities (UiOHF) .......................................................... 34 3.5 University of Stavanger, Faculty of Arts and Education (UiS) ......................................... 39 3.6 The Arctic University of Norway UiT, Faculty of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, (UiTHSL) ................................................................................................................... 43 3.7 University of Agder, Faculty of Humanities and Education (UiA)..................................... 47 3.8 Norwegian University of Science and Technology, University Museum (NTNUmuseum) 51 3.9 University of Bergen, University Museum (UiBmuseum) ................................................. 55 3.10 University of Oslo, Museum of Cultural History (UiOmuseum/KHM) ........................... 58 3.11 University of Stavanger, Museum of Archaeology (UiSmuseum) ................................ 60 3.12 The Arctic University of Norway UiT, Tromsø University Museum (UiTmuseum) ....... 63 3.13 BI Norwegian Business School (BI) .............................................................................. 67 3.14 Norwegian School of Economics (NHH) ....................................................................... 69 3.15 Telemark University College (HiT) ................................................................................ 72 3 3.16 Volda University College (HVO) ................................................................................... 75 3.17 Norwegian Institute for Defence Studies (IFS) ............................................................. 78 3.18 Norwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research (NIKU) ......................................... 81 3.19 UNI Research (UNI) ...................................................................................................... 84 4 Assessment of research groups ............................................................................................. 87 4.1 UiN-History ....................................................................................................................... 87 4.2 NTNUHF-FATNAT (The fate of nations) .......................................................................... 88 4.3 UiBHF-Health.................................................................................................................... 89 4.4 UiBHF-Homo sapiens ....................................................................................................... 90 4.5 UiBHF-Medieval ............................................................................................................... 92 4.6 UiBHF-Middle Eastern and African Studies ..................................................................... 93 4.7 UiBHF-Transnational History ............................................................................................ 94 4.8 UiOHF-Archaeology (ARK) .............................................................................................. 95 4.9 UiOHF-Children and Conceptions of Childhood in History .............................................. 96 4.10 UiOHF-History of Knowledge ........................................................................................ 97 4.11 UiOHF-SKiN – Systems of Knowledge in the Nordic Middle Ages .............................. 98 4.12 UiTHSL-CNN (Creating the New North) ....................................................................... 99 4.13 UiTHSL-NordFront ...................................................................................................... 100 4.14 UiTHSL- Sub-Arctic Stone Age Research Group (SARG) ......................................... 102 4.15 UiA-Religion and World-views in Social Context ........................................................ 103 4.16 UiB Museum-Universitetsmuseet ............................................................................... 104 4.17 UiO Museum/KHM - Centre for Viking-Age Studies (ViS) .......................................... 106 4.18 HVO-Cultural Encounters ........................................................................................... 107 4.19 NIKU-Building-Context-Transformation ...................................................................... 108 4.20 NIKU-City-SIS ............................................................................................................. 109 4.21 NIKU-Cultural Heritage Politics ................................................................................... 110 4.22 NIKU-Memories of War (Krigsminner) ........................................................................ 111 5 Reference list ........................................................................................................................ 113 6 List of abbreviations used in the reports ............................................................................... 114 7 List of panel members ........................................................................................................... 117 4 Summary The panel was struck by the considerable diversity of the institutional landscape in which research is carried out. It ranges from large universities, with large numbers of researchers and substantial time for research, to small teaching colleges with fractions of that time At the majority of institutions, researchers enjoyed good or excellent support for their research in terms of the time earmarked for research, financial support for research and research leave. PhD students are well funded. Indeed, such was the institutional level of support that there was little incentive for some researchers to seek external funding for individual projects. At the same time, the panel was struck by the considerable variety in the levels of support. At some smaller institutions, members of staff had a mere 10% of their time earmarked for research. At some of the new universities, lecturers with a research orientation co-existed with teachers without a PhD or without research time The development of research projects and applications for external funding should be encouraged further in future, but this also means that institutions need to provide adequate support for such initiatives (and to the scholars leading them). Such support should extend to preparing publications in English or other foreign languages at an academic level. Some English-language publications the panel
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bitstream – Capacity Building for Innovation
    Bitstream – Capacity Building for Innovation Final Report Mikael Söderström, Umeå Universitet Ulf Hedestig, Umeå Universitet Terje Fallmyr, Universitetet i Nordland Kjell Ellingsen, Universitetet i Nordland Hallstein Hegerholm, Høgskolen i Nesna Geir-Tore Klæboe, Høgskolen i Nesna WP-14.01 ISSN:1401-4580 Department of Informatics 1 Acknowledgments The project is financed by the European Interreg Botnia Atlantica and following partners 2 Introduction The report presents the realization of and results from the Botnia Atlantica funded project BitStream – Capacity Building for Innovation. The project started March 15 2013 and ended October 31 2014. Originally the project was scheduled to end April 15 2014, but for several reasons the project applied for and was granted extension until October 31 2014. The coordinating funding receiver has been Umeå University and the other Swedish partners has been the municipalities of Sorsele and Storuman. In Norway the partners has been Nesna University College, University of Nordland, the municipal of Bodø and the Norwegian National Collection Agency in Mo i Rana. In short, Bitstream is based on the starting-point that successful development of public administration requires good understanding of how its activities are conducted and how they are perceived by its citizens/customers. This means that process mapping and subsequent process analysis and impact mapping is a fundamental condition for innovative business development aimed at creating ICT innovations in the form of, for example, mobile apps or web-based services. The main objective of the project was to create a transnational platform for capacity building and exchange of experiences in the area of innovative business development.
    [Show full text]
  • Samlingsplan Nesna Og Mo I Rana
    Undervisningsplan for studieåret 2021-2022 - Fakultet for lærerutdanning, kunst og kultur (FLU) Nesna og Mo i Rana Med forbehold om endringer Forkortelser: Bo=Samling i Bodø, E=Eksamen, Mo= Samling i Mo i Rana, N=Nettsamling, OP=Observasjonspraksis, P=Praksis, S=samling på Nesna, St=samling i Stokmarknes Flerårige studier Nesna og Mo i Rana 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Dato -> 3-7 jan 4-8 okt 4-8 apr 1-5 nov 2-6 mai 6-10 jun 7-11 feb 6-10 des 6-10 sep 8-12 nov 9-13 mai 7-11 mar 10-14 jan 17-21 jan 24-28 jan 13-17 jun 20-24 jun 14-18 feb 21-25 feb 11-15 okt 18-22 okt 25-29 okt 11-15 apr 18-22 apr 25-29 apr 13-17 des 20-24 des 27-31 des 13-17 sep 20-24 sep 27-31 sep 16-20 aug 23-27 aug 15-19 nov 22-26 nov 16-20 mai 23-27 mai 14-18 mar 21-25 mar 27 jun-1 jul 31 jan-4 feb 31 jan-4 30 mai-3 jun 30 mai-3 30 aug-3 sep 30 aug-3 29 nov-3 des 29 nov-3 28 feb-5 mar 28 mar-1 apr 28 mar-1 Master grunnskolelærerutdanning MAGLU 1-7 MAGLU 2017 Nesna (GLU5) S N N S N S M A S T E R O P P G A V E MAGLU 2018 Nesna ( GLU 4) S N S N S P P P N S N S N P P P N S MAGLU 2019 Nesna (GLU 3) S N S N N S N P P P P N S N N S MAGLU 2020 Mo (GLU 2) Mo N Bo N P P P N Mo Mo N Bo N P P P N Mo MAGLU 2021 Mo (GLU1) Mo N Reg Bo N OP P P N Bo Mo N Bo Reg N P P P P N Mo MAGLU 5-10 MAGLU 2017 Nesna (GLU 5) S N N S N S M A S T E R O P O G A V E MAGLU 2018 Nesna (GLU 4) S N S N S P P P N S N S N P P P N S MAGLU 2019 Nesna (GLU 3) S N S N N S N P P P P N S N N S MAGLU 2020 Mo (GLU
    [Show full text]
  • Visa Information for Exchange Programs
    Visa Information for Exchange Programs In general, you will want to start this process 2-3 months before you plan to travel, or as prompted by your program. You may need to travel to another city to personally make application. For example, the closest embassies/consulates for Greece, Norway, South Korea and China are in Chicago. There are visa service providers, such as Travisa, which will do the legwork for you, saving ​ ​ you the travel. However, please note that it will cost more to acquire your visa through these services. Documentation ● Some documents, such as a letter of admission and verification of housing, will be provided by your program. ● Others, such as verification of insurance and a certificate of enrollment, will be provided by Augsburg. ● You may also be asked for tax returns or bank statements to verify funding, a health form, college (and possibly high school) transcripts. Augsburg University Exchange Partners 1) American College of Greece 2) American University of Beirut 3) Arcada University 4) Hong Kong Baptist University 5) iCLA Yamanshi Gakuin University 6) NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology 7) Nord University College 8) Oslo Metropolitan University 9) Østfold University College 10) Sejong University 11) Sungshin Women’s University 12) UiT: The Arctic University of Norway 13) United International College 14) Universidad Centroamericana 15) University of Warwick 16) Volda University College 17) Western Norway University of Applied Sciences 18) Yonsei University A merican College of Greece Fee: $124 ​ Travel to Chicago: varies ​ Cost of background check: approximately $50 ​ Cost for photo: $15 ​ You are required to apply for you visa in person at the Greek Consulate in Chicago (650 North Saint Clair ​ Street, Chicago IL 60611), and will need to make an appointment in advance.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2012
    Annual Report 2012 For Nord-Norge SpareBank 1 Nord-Norge in short SpareBank 1 Nord-Norge Design: Rød Tråd AS - Photo: Arthur AS - Photo: Arnesen Design: Rød Tråd SpareBank 1 Nord-Norge in short Operations 126 History 3 Group Management 128 Organizational charts 4 Main Board of Directors 130 Group key figures 6 Governing bodies 132 Important events in 2012 8 Corporate Governance 134 Vision and business concept 9 Risk management, internal control and capital management 140 The Bank’s history 10 Localization 11 Ownership structure 153 CEO’s report 12 Business description – Retail and corporate markets, SNN Markets 156 SpareBank 1-Alliance 162 Report and results 14 Corporate Responsibility 164 Annual Report 2012 16 Together we get things to happen 166 Annual Accounts - Income Statement 40 Spaceship Aurora 168 Annual Accounts - Balance Sheet 41 On a campervan tour with Hekla Stålstrenga 170 Annual Accounts - Changes in equity 42 Andsnes opens the Storm 172 Annual Accounts - Cash flow statement 44 Tromsø students receive Sirkus Eliassen Annual Accounts - Notes 45 as a donation from the Bank 174 Annual Accounts - Group profit analysis 121 Statement from the Main Board of Directors and the CEO 122 Report from the Control Committee 123 Auditor’s Report 124 2 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 40 SpareBank 1 Nord-Norge is the result of the merger of about 40 savings banks in Nordland, Troms and Finnmark. 75 SpareBank 1 Nord-Norge has an extensive network with a total of 75 branches, whereof 73 are in the region, including one in Svalbard. The Bank also has two branches in Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher Education 2025
    Norwegian Ministry Strategy of Education and Research Teacher Education 2025 National Strategy for Quality and Cooperation in Teacher Education Overview Teacher Education Institutions in Norway Hammerfest Kirkenes University of Tromsø -The Arctic University of Norway (231) Alta Campus Tromsø BLU, GLU 1-7 and 5-10, Lektor, PPU Campus Alta BLU, GLU 1-7 and 5-10 (Hammerfest, Kirkenes, Storslett Storslett), PPU-Y Tromsø Sàmi University of Applied Sciences (17) Kautokeino BLU, GLU 1-7 and 5-10 Nord University (433) Campus Bodø BLU, GLU 1-7 and 5-10, Lektor, PPU, PPU-Y Stokmarknes Campus Levanger BLU, GLU 1-7 and 5-10, Lektor, PPU, PPU-Y Campus Nesna BLU, GLU 1-7 and 5-10 (Mo i Rana, Namsos, Vesterålen) Norwegian University of Science and Technology (593) GLU 1-7 and 5-10, Yrkesfaglærer, PPU, PPU-Y, Lektor Bodø Queen Maud University College (220) BLU Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences (361) Campus Hamar BLU, GLU 1-7 and 5-10, Lektor, Faglærer, Volda University College (204) PPU BLU, GLU 1-7 and 5-10, PPU, PPU-Y Nesna Mo i Rana Campus Elverum Faglærer University of Bergen (136) Oslo Metropolitan University (968) Lektor, PPU Campus Oslo BLU, GLU 1-7 and 5-10, Faglærer Campus Kjeller Yrkesfaglærer, PPU-Y NLA University College (97) BLU, GLU 1-7 and 5-10 University of Oslo (409) Lektor, PPU PPU, Faglærer Western Norway University of Applied The Norwegian School of Sport Sciences (39) Sciences (810) Norwegian Academy of Music (26) PPU Campus Bergen BLU, GLU 1-7 and 5-10, Namsos BLU, 3-year teachered.
    [Show full text]
  • Revision of the EU's Arctic Strategy
    Sent by e-mail Breivikbotn, November 9th 2020 Input – Revision of the EU’s Arctic strategy Additional input from a total of 40 municipalities in North Norway, to the public consultation regarding the revision of the EU’s Arctic strategy. The municipalities are represented by 5 inter- municipal counsils; Vest-Finnmark Rådet (7 municipalities in Troms and Finnmark County), Vesterålen regionråd (6 municipalities in Nordland County), Salten Regionråd (10 municipalities in Nordland County), Indre Helgeland Regionråd (5 municipalities in Nordland County) and Helgelandsrådet (12 municipalities in Nordland County); 1. In your view, what have been the EU’s main achievements and failures under each of the three priorities in the 2016 Joint Communication? Vest-Finnmark Rådet, Vesterålen regionråd, Salten Regionråd, Indre Helgeland Regionråd and Helgelandsrådet embraces the EU’s engagement in promoting sustainable development in the Arctic. This priority marks a positive shift in how the Arctic is perceived as a strategically important territory, with green growth potential for the region and Europe. The EU’s top priority should be to assist the region in overcoming the Arctic paradox. That is, changing a demographic trend that is inversely correlated with economic growth. A stable demographic development is a necessary precondition for development and security in the Arctic regions. The most important means of meeting regional challenges in the Nordic/European part of the Arctic is by making use of the large natural resources in the region to stimulate economic growth and create new attractive jobs including utilizing the research institutions in the Arctic. The EU’s Arctic engagement shows great achievement, as exemplified by the processes leading to the report on Arctic investment needs in 2017, and the EU Arctic Forum in 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017 Content
    Annual report 2017 Content Point Resources Pro-forma key figures 4 in brief A platform for further growth established 6 Our history 8 Five core strategic activities 10 A diversified portfolio focused on four proven core areas 12 Material remaining potential in the Balder and Ringhorne area 14 Reserves and resources 27 Executive Management 28 From the Board of Directors 32 Board room Corporate governance 34 Board of Directors’ report 2017 36 Responsibility statement 42 Financial Consolidated Financial Statements 44 Statements Alternative Performance Measures 93 Financial Statements Point Resources AS (Parent Company) 94 Auditor's report 129 In the section Point Resources in brief, pro-forma numbers are used mainly to illustrate the operational and financial effect of the acquisition of ExxonMobil’s operated NCS portfolio in 2017 by use of the economic date of the transaction, 1 January 2017, rather than the date for closing of the transaction, 1 November 2017. It is in the Board of Director’s opinion that use of pro-forma numbers for 2017 is a representative way of showing Point Resources’ underlying performance for 2017. The Consolidated Financial Statements prepared according to IFRS are based on the completion date 1 November 2017, and numbers for 2017 in this section may therefore differ from the Consolidated Financial Statements. All production, reserve and resource data in this annual report are net to Point Resources AS. Point Resources AS has an ambition to become a leading, independent E&P company on the Norwegian Continental Shelf
    [Show full text]
  • Status for Fusjonsarbeidet
    Soft Nano Science/Technology Jon Otto Fossum Norwegian University of Science and Technology - NTNU Trondheim Norway Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology - NTNU Trondheim Oslo-Trondheim ~45 min by plane Norwegian University of Science and Technology - NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology - NTNU Foto: Carl-Erik Eriksson Norwegian University of Science and Technology STUDIES 14 University-level institutions in Norway 1) NTNU – Norwegian University of Science and Technology 13 2) University of Oslo 3) Norwegian University of Life Sciences 4) Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration 5) Norwegian School of Sport Sciences 16 6) The Oslo School of Architecture and Design 7) The Norwegian Academy of Music 8) The Norwegian School of Veterinary Science 9) UniK – University Graduate Centre, Kjeller 1 10) The Norwegian Lutheran School of Theology 11) University of Stavanger 12) University of Bergen 12 13) University of Tromsø 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 14) The University Centre in Svalbard 11 15) University of Agder 15 16) University of Nordland Norway has ~ 5 million inhabitants May 2013 Academic history 1217 Schola Cathedralis Nidrosiensis 1760 Royal Norwegian Society of Sciences and Letters 1910 Norwegian Institute of Technology (NTH) 1922 Norwegian Teachers’ College [in Trondheim] (NLHT) 1950 SINTEF (the Foundation for Technical and Industrial Research at NTH) 1955 Norwegian Academy of Technological Sciences (NTVA) (Trondheim) 1968 University in Trondheim (UNIT)
    [Show full text]
  • Visuell Identitet
    VISUELL IDENTITET En sosialsemiotisk analyse av hvordan utdanningsinstitusjoners identitet kommer til uttrykk gjennom institusjonenes logo og nettside. SUSANNE OTTESEN BERGSTØL VEILEDER Anne Margit Løvland Universitetet i Agder, 2017 Fakultet for humaniora og pedagogikk Institutt for nordisk og mediefag Sammendrag Formålet med denne oppgaven er å belyse hvordan identitet kan analyseres som sosialsemiotikk og hvordan identitet kan uttrykkes gjennom semiotiske ressurser. Ved å studere et utvalg tekster knyttet til utdanningsinstitusjoner vil jeg komme frem til svar på problemstillingen “hva slags identitet kommuniserer universiteter og høyskoler gjennom kombinasjon av ulike visuelle elementer?”. Dette krever ett nærmere blikk på begrepet identitet, samt hvilke samfunnsmessige krav som stilles til utdanningsinstitusjoner. Med sosialsemiotikkens perspektiver gjør jeg en analyse av et utvalg nettsider og logoer for å se på hvilke meningsbærende ressurser de er sammensatt av. I tillegg til å studere tekstene trekker jeg inn den omkringliggende konteksten. Konteksten innebærer stortingsmeldingen ”Konsentrasjon for kvalitet” som skal bidra til å styrke utdanning og forskning. Den aktuelle situasjonskonteksten er søknadsfristen for å søke høyere utdanning. Elementer jeg ser på i analysen er logo, fargebruk og typografi fordi dette er sentrale elementer innenfor en visuell identitet. Videre ser jeg på bruk av bilder og ordbruk, da dette uttrykker noe om hvem de er som institusjon og hva slags verden de ønsker å presentere. Arbeidet viser blant
    [Show full text]
  • The Bologna Process and Heis Institutional Autonomy
    Athens Journal of Education - Volume 7, Issue 4, November 2020 – Pages 364-384 The Bologna Process and HEIs Institutional Autonomy By Linda Helén Haukland The Bologna Process has made a strong impact on the development of European higher education, although the greatest impact has not been from the process itself, but from the national reforms introduced along with it. With a relatively young higher education system, Norway was ahead of most European countries in implementing the Bologna Process and reforms indirectly linked to it. Due to path dependencies and the Higher Education Institutions being, to a certain extent, autonomous and carriers of their own culture, we cannot draw conclusions at the local level without empirical studies. Therefore, the case of Nord University shows us how this process directly and indirectly affected Higher Education Institutions in Norway. The Higher Education Institutions (HEI) integrated horizontally in an education system that was increasingly hierarchical and competitive. The need for standardisation in order to secure equality and efficiency, and the demand for greater autonomy in the HEIs was answered by strengthening some and weakening other forms of institutional autonomy along with the establishment of a new accreditation system. Three dimensions of autonomy are touched on in this study. Firstly, the question of who has decision-making power in the HEIs defines whether they are ruled by professional or administrative autonomy. Secondly, the question of the HEIs’ mission is decided either by the HEI itself, representing substantive autonomy, or by external demands on production and external funding, representing what I call beneficial autonomy. Finally, the question of how the HEIs fulfil their mission decides whether they have individual autonomy or procedural autonomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Og Hurtigbåtsamband
    Grylleord Andenes-Grylleord (Troms og Finnmark) Andenes Bleik FERGESAMBAND, LOKAL- OG HURTIGBÅTSAMBAND Stø Risøyhamn 935 Nordland fylke 2020 - hovedstrukturer Myre Alsvåg Øksnes Tunnstad 82 Myre-Øksnes-Vestbygd Smines 939 TROMS OG FINNMARK 821 Harstad Tinden Skipnes BarkestadLangøy Finvåg Hadsel SigerlandSkjellord AustringenGrødset 820 E6 Fiskebøl-Melbu 820 Sortland 85 Straume Bjerkvik Digermulen-Finnvik 885 82 820 Bogen E10 E10 Svolvær-Skutvik via Skrova Bø Hol 822 BJØRNFJELL Stokmarknes (SVERIGE) 82 Kaljord Tysorden Lonkan Evenesvika Narvik Helgenes Sommerset Melbu Brottøy Ingelsord Hanøy Kjeldebotn Reineorden Storå E6 Fiskebøl Lødingen E10 Svartskard Kvannkjosen Øksneshavn Ballangen 868 Digermulen Holandshavn Bognes-Lødingen Sundklakkstraumen Finnvik Skarberget Ulvåg Bognes 827 Svolvær Bognes-Skarberget Bøstad Brettesnes Kabelvåg Nevervik Drag-Kjøpsvik Skrova Ulvsvåg Kjøpsvik Leknes Oppeid Storå 81 Hulløyhamn Stamsund Drag 81 Ramberg Kjerrvika 986 Ballstad Skutvik Innhavet E10 835 Kjerkorden Musken Rostad NEX 2 Vindstad Bogøy Reine Hellemobotn Moskenes Nordskot E6 Å Leinesorden Nordfold Bodø-Røst-Værøy-Moskenes Hellnessund Brennsund Værøy Rørstad Tårnvik Styrkesnes Festvåg-Misten Røsvik Bodø-Værran Misten Røst 826 Sørlandego Festvåg Bodø-Gildeskål Vokkøy Kvig 616 826 Helligvær Straumen Sund-Horsdal-Sørarnøy 80 Ørnes-Meløyene Fauske Givær Bliksvær Ørnes-Vassdalsvik-Meløysund- Bodø Bolga Tuv 812 E6 Forøy-Ågskardet Mevær Sørarnøy Fleinvær (Sørvær) 17 Rognan Våg Horsdal 472 Nordfugløy NEX 1 Sund Sørfugløy Inndyr 838 Kystgodsruta Moldjord Støtt Reipå Texmona Rødøy/Melordbotn Ørnes Valøy Eidbukta Meløysund Mesøy 77 GRADDIS Kilboghamn-Jektvik Glomord (SVERIGE) Bolga Sandvik Grønøy Rendal HOVEDSTRUKTURER 464 17 Rødøybassenget Forøy Myken Ågskardet Pr april 2020 har Nordland fylke: Rødøy-Rødøyene Vågaholmen Rødøy Nordværnes (2 HB kaier + ferge) 28 fergesamband , hvorav 4 er Lurøy 440 Gjærøy Jektvik riksveisamband og ett krysser fylkesgrensen Stokkvågen-Træna Nordnesøy Sundøy til Troms og Finnmark.
    [Show full text]
  • Research and Innovation Strategy for Møre Og Romsdal 2016-2020
    A manifest partner Research and Innovation Strategy for Møre og Romsdal 2016-2020 Research and innovation strategy 2016-2020 2 FOREWORD Foreword The region of Møre og Romsdal is currently in a period of change. The regional authority has therefore developed a research and innovation strategy to meet the challenges faced by businesses in the region. This strategy has been compiled by applying the "Smart Specialisation" method, in which the interaction between businesses, research groups and the public support system is a central aspect. The region of Møre og Romsdal has been awarded a place on a European Commission study together with sev- eral other regions in Europe, and the study involving Møre og Romsdal comprises part of the knowledge platform on which the new strategy has been based. The fact that our region has been studied and assessed by external parties eliminates any reservations that our new strategy has been based on myths and theories that cannot be documented. The analyses that were part of the study provided us with excellent guidelines in terms of both content and process for the strategy, and these have broadly been followed in the strategy process. The strategy document shows us what our target areas must be if we are to ensure competitive businesses for the future. These are in principle as follows: • A general need for change and a higher rate of inno- vation within businesses. • A reduction in petroleum-related activities with con- sequences for large parts of the maritime industry. • The green shift and its requirements on sustainability and reduced environmental impact.
    [Show full text]