DOCSLIB.ORG

Strong Female Characters: Jane Austen's Vs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strong Female Characters: Jane Austen's Vs Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Honors College Capstone Experience/Thesis Honors College at WKU Projects Spring 4-30-2018 Strong Female Characters: Jane Austen's vs. The Mashups' Rachel McCoy Western Kentucky University, rachel.mccoy270@topper.wku.edu Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/stu_hon_theses Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, English Language and Literature Commons, and the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons Recommended Citation McCoy, Rachel, "Strong Female Characters: Jane Austen's vs. The ashM ups'" (2018). Honors College Capstone Experience/Thesis Projects. Paper 740. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/stu_hon_theses/740 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors College Capstone Experience/ Thesis Projects by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact topscholar@wku.edu. STRONG FEMALE CHARACTERS: JANE AUSTEN’S VS. THE MASHUPS’ A Capstone Experience/ Thesis Project Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Bachelor of English Literature with Honors College Graduate Distinction at Western Kentucky University By Rachel T. McCoy ***** Western Kentucky University 2018 CE/T Committee: Professor Walker Rutledge, Chair Professor Robert Hale Doctor Christopher Keller Copyright by Rachel McCoy 2018 ABSTRACT The comparison of Strong Female Characters in Jane Austen’s novels Pride & Prejudice and Sense & Sensibility, with the altered characters in the monster mashups by Seth Grahame-Smith and Ben Winters, Pride and Prejudice and Zombies and Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters, respectively, reveals differences between the two society’s understanding and portrayal of strength and femininity. Because these texts are so closely connected – Austen is listed as a co-author of both mashups – the differences evident in the representations of women more clearly reveal the differing cultural values. Close textual analysis of the development of three primary female characters – Marianne Dashwood, Elinor Dashwood, and Elizabeth Bennet – through their respective novels and their parallel journeys in the mashups demonstrates that the mashups have weakened the characters. Though the mashups are advertised as making Austen’s characters into Strong Female Characters, Austen’s women are already strong. Keywords: Jane Austen, Mashups, Strong Female Characters, Popular Literature, Pride and Prejudice, Sense and Sensibility iii DEDICATION I dedicate this thesis to all of my family and friends who experienced my obsession with Jane Austen and still encouraged me to keep going – especially anyone who has played “Marrying Mr. Darcy” with me. I love you all. Thank you so much. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would first like to acknowledge my family, especially my parents. Their life- long encouragement has made this project possible, and without them I would never have had the courage to take on this project, let alone finish it. I would also like to thank my friends, who have listened to me talk through my ideas and my complaints in equal measure. Their continual willingness to be my sounding board has been invaluable. And, of course, this thesis would not be possible without the efforts of Professor Rutledge. His suggestions and encouragements have been invaluable. Thank you so much for keeping me accountable during this process. I would also like to thank Professor Hale for working on this project. Thank you both. It has been an honor to work with you. v VITA EDUCATION Western Kentucky University , Bowling Green, KY May 2019 B.A. in English Literature – Mahurin Honors College Graduate Honors Capstone: Strong Female Characters: Jane Austen’s vs. The Mashups’ Simon Kenton High School, Independence, KY May 2015 FIELDS OF STUDY Major fields: English Literature and Mathematics PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE The Distance Learning Testing Center, WKU Aug. 2017- Proctor and Team Lead Present Dominach’s Taekwondo Academy Aug. 2014- Staff Instructor Present AWARDS & HONORS President’s Scholar 2015, 2016, 2017 Award of 1906 Presidential Scholarship, WKU, 2015-2018 INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE Harlaxton College, Harlaxton, England Jan. 2017- April 2017 PRESENTATIONS McCoy, Rachel. “Strong Female Characters: Jane Austen vs. Monster Mashups.” Paper presented at the Kentucky Honors Roundtable Conference. Highland Heights, KY, 30 Sept. 2017. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract .............................................................................................................................. iii Dedication .......................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Acknowledgments............................................................................................................... v Vita ..................................................................................................................................... vi Foreword ............................................................................................................................. 1 Chapter One: Marianne Dashwood ..................................................................................... 8 Chapter Two: Elinor Dashwood ....................................................................................... 22 Chapter Three: Elizabeth Bennet ...................................................................................... 37 Afterword .......................................................................................................................... 52 Works Cited ...................................................................................................................... 58 vii FOREWORD Jane Austen – a beloved, never-out-of-print author – is today often sadly confined to the genre of chick lit and therefore dismissed by some contemporary readers. As a result, a few writers have felt the need to update her Regency novels to reflect the current fascination with the supernatural as depicted in such televisions series as The Walking Dead. A specific complaint about Pride & Prejudice (1813) and Sense & Sensibility (1811) is that they present marriage as the ideal ending. With the intention of mocking and capitalizing upon these works, Seth Graham-Smith and Ben Winters have modified the novels by adding zombies and sea monsters to create Pride and Prejudice and Zombies (2009) and Sense, Sensibility, and Sea Monsters (2009). These novels are mashups, which is one of three distinct categories that authors utilize when adapting texts. The other two are parodies and modernizations. Parodies model or imitate another work in order to create a comic effect by keeping the style and changing the content. They change the intent of the piece, which is reflected in this genre’s occasional use as a political tool, despite the inherent humor such changes bring. Having a long history, parody is used alongside satire by exaggerating a point to highlight its ridiculousness. Jonathan Swift’s “A Modest Proposal” is an example of how pointed the combination of satire and parody can be, but a more straightforward parody is Don Quixote, by Miguel de Cervantes, which parodies the then current chivalric genre. Modernizations involve the original content, such as dialogue, while updating the setting without changing 1 the intent of the work. This form of adaptation has been applied to many Shakespeare plays, where the dialogue is intact, but the setting has been greatly altered. Mashups, however, combine two or more significant elements or plots, which invariably change the story. In the cases of Pride and Prejudice and Zombies and Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters, an existing story is combined with monsters to create a sort of “franken-story” that retains elements of the original. This is different from a modernization because a modernization keeps the meaning of the story the same, while the different elements in a mashup invariably pollute, change, or dilute the original meaning. A mashup is also different from a parody because while it does often highlight an element of ridiculousness, it is not making an overall joke nor a political point as a parody does. The mashup genre has done well in recent years, as evidenced by the sales of Pride and Prejudice and Zombies and Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters. A year after being published, there were over a million copies of Pride and Prejudice and Zombies in print in addition to 375,000 copies of Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters (Deahl). This does not mark the end of the popularity of this sort of work either; in 2016, a movie adaptation of Pride and Prejudice and Zombies was released after much anticipation. On the other hand, Austen’s novels have not only continued to survive but have thrived, with over 20 million copies of Pride & Prejudice alone sold to date (Frost et al). The benefit of looking at Pride and Prejudice and Zombies and Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters, which are the result of modern cultural trends, alongside such time-honored works as Pride & Prejudice and Sense & Sensibility, is that the surprising similarities and differences between the two cultures become ripe for analysis. Scholars have begun the task of using mashups, modernizations, and parodies as lenses 2 through which to analyze contemporary culture and traditional literature. There are over a dozen published articles on Pride and Prejudice and Zombies as well as several masters’ theses. Katherine Koballa’s
Load more
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

64 pages remaining, click to load more.

Recommended publications
  • Sanditon Scripted by Emmy® Award Winner Andrew Davies Premiering on MASTERPIECE on PBS January 12, 2020
    Jane Austen’s Final Unfinished Work—Finished! Sanditon Scripted by Emmy® Award Winner Andrew Davies Premiering on MASTERPIECE on PBS January 12, 2020 Jane Austen was chronically ill with a mysterious disease in early 1817, when she turned her thoughts to a happier subject. She started work on a witty and delightful novel set in a seaside town. She never finished it. Now, noted screenwriter Andrew Davies (Pride and Prejudice, Les Misérables, Primetime Emmy® winner for Little Dorrit) picks up Austen’s plot and takes it in a glorious and satisfying direction, on Sanditon. Produced by Red Planet Pictures, the eight-hour series will premiere on MASTERPIECE on PBS on Sunday, January 12, 2020 at 9pm ET. MASTERPIECE’s bold and lavish adaptation of Jane Austen’s final work stars Rose Williams (Curfew) as Austen’s lively but levelheaded heroine, Charlotte Heywood; Theo James (Divergent) as the humorous, charming (and slightly wild!) Sidney Parker; Anne Reid (Years and Years) as the forthright grande dame of Sanditon, Lady Denham; Kris Marshall (Love Actually) as Sanditon’s compulsively enterprising promoter, Tom Parker; and Crystal Clarke (Ordeal by Innocence) as the mysterious West Indian heiress, Miss Lambe. Also appearing are Kate Ashfield (Secrets and Lies) as Tom’s stalwart spouse, Mary; Jack Fox (Riviera) as the fortune hunter Sir Edward Denham; Charlotte Spencer (Watership Down) as Sir Edward’s scheming sister, Esther; and Lily Sacofsky (Bancroft) as the enigmatic and elegant Clara Brereton. With four acclaimed Austen adaptations to his credit (Pride and Prejudice, Sense and Sensibility, Northanger Abbey and Emma), plus the Pride and Prejudice modernization Bridget Jones’s Diary, Andrew Davies is no stranger to Jane Austen’s story strategies— which makes him the perfect candidate to channel the creative spirit of one of the world’s most amusing and penetrating novelists.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Dimensional Feminism: Elizabeth Bennet and the Representation of Women in the Media
    Eliana Berger eberger@ithaca.edu Multi-Dimensional Feminism: Elizabeth Bennet and the Representation of Women in the Media Depictions of women in the media have historically been less representative of actual people than of idealized, single-faceted characters. Women on television and in books are too often defined by a single trait or belief; they are either beautiful or ugly, foolish or intelligent, strong or weak, inspirational or malevolent. Seldom are women depicted as complex people with conflicting thoughts and feelings wholly their own. Understanding this, one can perceive the importance of Elizabeth Bennet from Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. She was a strong – though faulted – female character who understood and advocated for her values, undermining contemporary stereotypes with her outspokenness. Elizabeth’s world is typical of middle-class Caucasian families of the 1790s, when the book was originally written. She and the other women in the story are defined and confined by romantic-era, cult of sensibility stereotypes: women are frail, hypersensitive creatures whose only worth is in their marriage prospects. Her mother is prone to fainting. All of Elizabeth’s sisters are encouraged to find men to marry as soon as possible to secure themselves futures. However, Austen breaks with this conventional image in how she portrays Elizabeth. Elizabeth Bennet, by the end of the novel, is a fully-formed human being with feminist opinions on the world around her and the intelligence to back them up with. She is just as much a complex human as any of the men in the story, in spite of being a woman.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Intrapersonal Conflict Characters in Sense and Sensibility's
    ANALYSIS OF INTRAPERSONAL CONFLICT CHARACTERS IN SENSE AND SENSIBILITY’S NOVEL BY JANE AUSTEN THESIS Submitted by HAIRI MUNANDAR NIM. 140203178 Student of Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan Department of English Language Education FAKULTAS TARBIYAH DAN KEGURUAN UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI AR-RANIRY BANDA ACEH 2021 M / 1441 H HAIRI MUNANDAR NIM. 140203178 Student of Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan Department of English Language Education SURAT PERNYATAAN KEASLIAN (Declaration of Originality) Saya yang bertandatangan di bawah ini: Nama : Hairi Munandar NIM : 140203178 Tempat/tanggal lahir : Blang Pidie/21 April 1995 Alamat : Rukoh, Darussalam, Banda Aceh Menyatakan dengan sesungguhnya bahwa skripsi yang berjudul: Analysis of Intrapersonal conflict Characters in Sense and Sensibility’s Novel by Jane Austen adalah benar-benar karya saya, kecuali semua kutipan dan referensi yang disebutkan sumbernya. Apabila terdapat kesalahan dan kekeliruan di dalamnya, maka akan sepenuhnya menjadi tanggungjawab saya. Demikianlah surat pernyataan ini saya buat dengan sesungguhnya. Banda Aceh, 12 December 2020 Saya yang membuat surat pernyataan, Hairi Munandar ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Alhamdulillah, all praises be to Allah SWT, The Most Gracious, The Most Merciful, The King who owns the power over all the creatures and who always blesses and gives me health, strength and passion to accomplish this thesis. Peace and salutation be upon the prophet Muhammad SAW whom together with his family and companions has struggled whole heartedly to guide his ummah to the right way. First of all, I would like to dedicate my deepest gratitude and appreciation to my supervisors Khairiah Syahabuddin, M.Hsc. ESL., M.TESOL., Ph.D. and Rita Hermida, M.Pd. for their valuable guidance, advices, support, kindness, insightful comment, and immense knowledge in completing this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Sense and Sensibility: a Sermon on Living the Examined Life
    University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations Dissertations and Theses Summer 8-9-2017 Sense and Sensibility: A Sermon on Living the Examined Life Sarah J. Mejias University of New Orleans, smejias@uno.edu Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td Part of the Ancient Philosophy Commons, Christianity Commons, Ethics in Religion Commons, History of Religion Commons, and the Literature in English, British Isles Commons Recommended Citation Mejias, Sarah J., "Sense and Sensibility: A Sermon on Living the Examined Life" (2017). University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations. 2387. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/2387 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by ScholarWorks@UNO with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact scholarworks@uno.edu. Sense and Sensibility: A Sermon on Living the Examined Life A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of New Orleans in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In English by Sarah J.
    [Show full text]
  • Marianne Dashwood and Charlotte Lucas (The Christian Ideal of Marriage in Jane Austen)
    Not Said But Shown 432 17. Marianne Dashwood and Charlotte Lucas (The Christian Ideal of Marriage in Jane Austen) ----- Marianne Dashwood at seventeen believes in “wholeheartedness.” One should cultivate right feelings as far as one possibly can, and express them frankly and to the full; and all with whom one can relate properly must do the same. One’s feelings should be intense, and the expression of them should be enthusiastic and eloquent. Towards those whose feelings are right, but who cannot achieve this freedom of expression, one must be charitable; but one should avoid all whose thought and behavior is governed by convention. Following convention corrupts one’s “sensibility,” so that one can no longer tell what the truth of natural feeling is. Thus, when Edward Ferrars and Marianne’s sister Elinor become mutually attached, Marianne approves of Edward — and she certainly agrees with her mother, who says, “I have never yet known what it was to separate esteem and love” (SS, I, iii, 16). But she cannot imagine how Elinor can be in love with Edward, because he lacks true “sensibility.” “Edward is very amiable, and I love him tenderly. But . his figure is not striking . His eyes want all that spirit, that fire, which at once announce virtue and intelligence . he has no real taste . I could not be happy with a man whose taste did not in every point coincide with my own . how spiritless, how tame was Edward’s manner in reading to us last night! . it would have broke my heart had I loved him, to hear him read with so little sensibility” (17-8).
    [Show full text]
  • Pride and Prejudice and Persuasion
    RTN_C01.qxd 6/22/07 2:04 PM Page 13 Chapter 1 Pride and Prejudice and Persuasion Jane Austen is an author readers think they know. At least one reader of Austen has described heaven as a place where you would habitually engage in con- versation with her. There are Austen societies in England and in the United States. Some readers concern themselves with every detail of her novels and their social settings, down to the cut of dresses and the recipes for the food consumed in them. There is indeed a name for such people, “Janeites.” Henry James objected to all this, writing disparagingly of those who, for commercial gain, in his view distorted her actual (and considerable) achievement by invit- ing readers to think of her as “their ‘dear,’ our dear, everybody’s dear, Jane.”1 Rudyard Kipling, by contrast, wrote a story celebrating a particular group of Janeites – a group of World War I soldiers who kept their sanity intact by engag- ing in an elaborate ritual of giving the military objects around them names drawn from the persons and places depicted in “Jane’s” novels, and testing each other on their details. The palpable realities of her world, its men and women and settings, were apparently sufficient to ward off the horrific realities of trench warfare, if anything could. The idea that novels contain real people and are told to us directly by their authors is one that teachers of the novel often find themselves combating – usually for good reasons. Readers who think of characters as if they were real people living in the real world have a way of remaking those characters according to the logic of the familiar world they themselves inhabit, which can be a way of short-circuiting a more difficult but in the end more rewarding kind of reading that takes into account historical, cultural, and ideological differences between the present and the past, and is alive to the novelist’s craft.
    [Show full text]
  • Elinor and Edward's Plans for Lucy Steele
    Elinor and Edward’s Plans for Lucy Steele A Novelette and Parody of Jane Austen’s Sense and Sensibility By Mary Lydon Simonsen Quail Creek Publishing, LLC http://marysimonsenfanfiction.blogspot.com Prologue The family of Dashwood had long been settled in Sussex at Norland Park. The manor house was a massive stone edifice of three stories with two wings and an extensive park where sheep nibbled the lawn by day and deer by night. It was home to Henry Dashwood, a kind man and good father, and his wife. Mrs. Dashwood was a good-hearted woman and affectionate mother, who, whether for joy or sorrow, was given to bouts of weeping. They had three daughters: the practical Elinor, a handsome woman of twenty-one years, the romantic Marianne, a beautiful lady of nineteen, and the young Margaret, a pistol of a thirteen-year-old given to eavesdropping and spying on her neighbors. At Norland Park, life was a bowl of cherries. Elinor, being an outdoorsy type person, enjoyed the extensive grounds of woods and meadows, Marianne, being the opposite of her older sister, had her music and poetry, and Margaret, being a combination of her elder sisters, had a tree house with a retractable rope ladder where she would often play her lap harp. From her perch, she watched and reported on all the comings and goings of the inhabitants of the manor house and any visitors to the estate. Little did young Margaret know that on the day she looked through her spyglass and saw Dr. Cureall’s carriage coming down the drive that her world was about to change—and not for the better.
    [Show full text]
  • “—A Very Elegant Looking Instrument—” Musical Symbols And
    ('-a very elegant looking instrumgnl-"' Musical Symbols and Substance in Films of Jane Austen's Novels KATHRYN L. SHANKS LIBIN Department of Music, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY 12604-0018 The recent flowering of Jane Austen novels on television and film raises fascinating issues of interpretation and authenticity. Great efforts have been made to recreate believable nineteenth-century backgrounds; the houses, furniture, costumes, jewelry, and so forth all show scrupulous historical research and attention to detail. origi- nal musical instruments have likewise been featured in these new visual versions of Jane Austen's texts. However, it is relatively easy to flt an attractive old instrument into its period setting; finding the right tone with the music itself is'a much more complicated problem, und fe* of the film makers involved with Austen's works have demonstrated perfect pitch in this matter. For the problem consists not simply of finding the right musical symbols: the proper instru- ments, or sound, or representative pieces of music that Jane Austen might have known; but of grappling, as well, with the musical substance ofher novels. In certain instances music is an essential plot device; and musical performance reveals key aspects of personality in many of her characters. Jane Austen herself faithfully practiced the piano, and copied out music into notebooks for her own use. Indeed, her music notebooks show that she was an accomplished musician, possessing a firm grasp of the rules and implications of musical notation and, not iurpiisingly, an elegant copyist's hand.' The mere existence of these notibooks, which represent countless hours of devoted labor as well as pleasure, shows the central role that music played in Austen's own life.
    [Show full text]
  • JANE AUSTEN's SCRIPT of SISTERHOOD Each of Jane
    ABSTRACT THE PROBLEM OF FEMALE RESERVE: JANE AUSTEN’S SCRIPT OF SISTERHOOD Each of Jane Austen’s novels looks at sisterhood from a different angle, exploring varying versions of sisterhood that all point to its indisputable necessity in the lives of women. At the same time, however, Austen illustrates that female reserve frequently prevents sister relationships from reaching their full potential. Sisterly reserve is often tied to romantic interests, as women succumb to cultural pressure to hide their feelings at all costs. This thesis analyzes the complexities of the sister relationships in Austen’s six novels, tracing the struggles with silence that often result in a temporary or even permanent breakdown of female community. Through her portrayals of sisters, Austen also raises questions about moral development and female isolation, indicating that strong sisterhoods cultivate greater moral awareness, and that women without sisters still benefit from the female communities they create. The complete script that surfaces from an examination of all her novels argues that sisters and women consistently experience stronger female communities and greater participation in the world of rationality and meaning when they are able to overcome these instances of silence and jointly negotiate their experiences. Kristen Akina May 2011 THE PROBLEM OF FEMALE RESERVE: JANE AUSTEN’S SCRIPT OF SISTERHOOD by Kristen Akina A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in English in the College of Arts and Humanities California State University, Fresno May 2011 APPROVED For the Department of English: We, the undersigned, certify that the thesis of the following student meets the required standards of scholarship, format, and style of the university and the student's graduate degree program for the awarding of the master's degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Silence and the Duel in Sense and Sensibility
    “He to defend: I to punish”: Silence and the Duel in t Sense and Sensibility :Li VINCE BREWTON Vince Brewton (email: vbrewton@unanov.una.edu) is Assistant Professor of English at the University of North Alabama. He has written for The Southern Quarterly and The Continuum Encyclopedia of American Literature. His ongoing research reflects on the relationship between identity and violence. A t the heart of Sense and Sensibility we find a little-noted duel, an affair of honor conducted between Colonel Brandon and Willoughby, two of the three male principals in the novel. The duel, though heavy with significance for the novel, is interestingly underemphasized in the text itself and largely unacknowledged in critical discussion. A Regency duel is an example of what Peter Gay calls “the cultivation of hatred,” i.e., the sub- limation of raw aggression as well as the deliberately nurtured expression of that same resentment.1 The “hatred” sufficient to provoke a duel arises over Willoughby’s seduction of Brandon’s ward, Eliza, and the duel exists for the reader only because its participants engage in a secondary discur- sive “duel” on the “site” of Elinor Dashwood, each confiding in her his grievance and his justification for his conduct. While the duel is never revealed to us in its details directly or indi- rectly, it is significant as an emblem of the power relations informing the plot of Sense and Sensibility. I want to place the unconsidered duel within the framework of power relations in the work while at the same time undertaking to read the novel in light of the duel’s significance and deter- mine the extent to which it alters or affirms our approach to the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION Jane Austen: An influential woman Thanks to her sharp wit and strong female characters, Jane Austen’s literature is still utterly relevant. Author Claire Harman asks – is she the most influential woman of the past 200 years? In 1811, a 35- year-old Hampshire spinster had her first book published anonymously: Sense And Sensibility, By A Lady. It got two brief, polite reviews, sold 500 copies and was swiftly forgotten. But 200 years later, everyone knows Jane Austen. She’s not just a writer, she’s a cult, a brand and a cultural touchstone. This marked the transition from obscurity to being one of this century and last’s most influential literary figures. It’s hard to believe her six short novels – yes, it really is just six – are still bought in their millions (because her work is out of copyright, there is no accurate estimate of how many). Austen’s influence and literary pulling-power can’t be over-estimated. She’s reached millions of people all over the world, not simply through the number of languages she’s been translated into (35 at the last count), but because there’s something in her work that readers connect with instantly. We read her because we feel she understands us – despite being born over two centuries ago. In many ways, her books are more in tune with our times and tastes than her own. In the first review she ever received, she was taken to task for a ‘want of newness’, but her books now seem markedly more original than anything else of the period.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconciling Morality and Judgment in Pride and Prejudice Micaela
    MacDougall: Reconciling Morality and Judgment in Pride and Prejudice 1 Reconciling Morality and JudgmentPride in and Prejudice Micaela MacDougall, St. John’s College, Annapolis One of the major themes of Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice is the relationship between moral goodness and good judgment, particularly insofar as human beings use A these faculties to relate to other people.1 This theme is first indicated by the title of the novel. Pride is a moral fault, that of centering on oneself and not considering others. Prejudice, by contrast, is a fault of judgment: a hasty judgment made before one fully considers the whole of the situation (a pre-judgment). Thus, the title focuses the reader on these two faults and implicitly raises the question of the relationship between morality and judgment. How are these faults related? What does their relationship show about the relationship between the moral faculty and the faculty of judgment? One could easily think of them as opposed to each other; accurate judgment leads one to see others’ deficiencies and to have less goodwill towards them. But is there a way in which it is possible for moral goodness and good judgment to complement each other, since they are both inherent human faculties? In order to explore these questions, this paper will begin by examining morality and judgment separately. This may be done by looking at the characters of Jane and Mr. Bennet. Jane is very good morally, but does not judge others; her character thus exemplifies the moral faculty. Mr. Bennet loves to judge others, but refuses to interact 1 As it is a story of the interactions between people, and especially a story of love and marriage, it is unfitting to usePride and Prejudice to consider these faculties abstractly; that is, we are not here exploring how morality might relate a single human to some theoretical natural law, or how judgment might relate a single human to certain philosophical truths, but how multiple humans might relate to each other by means of morality and judgment.
    [Show full text]