DOCSLIB.ORG

Epping Forest District Council Representations to the Draft Local Plan Consultation 2016 (Regulation 18)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Epping Forest District Council Representations to the Draft Local Plan Consultation 2016 (Regulation 18) Epping Forest District Council Representations to the Draft Local Plan Consultation 2016 (Regulation 18) Stakeholder ID 4806 Name Bruce Banks Fairfield Fairbank Residents Association (FFRA) Method Survey Date This document has been created using information from the Council’s database of responses to the Draft Local Plan Consultation 2016. Some elements of the full response such as formatting and images may not appear accurately. Should you wish to review the original response, please contact the Planning Policy team: [email protected] Survey Response: 1. Do you agree with the overall vision that the Draft Plan sets out for Epping Forest District? Strongly disagree Please explain your choice in Question 1: These plans for Chipping Ongar will decimate this historical town. As for the Greensted Road proposed development we can't understand why the historical Parish of Greensted is sited for proposed development for the following reasons: 1. Parish of the oldest wooden church in the world. How long will it take until we have takeaways next to the church? 2. This parish needs to be preserved for generations to come. 3. Fairfield Road supports approx. 180 homes, it can't take another 160. 4. Greensted Road has no clear point of entry for this development, this would be an accident waiting to happen. 5. We as land owners were NEVER asked if we wanted houses built in our gardens! 2. Do you agree with the overall vision that the Draft Plan sets out for Epping Forest District? Strongly disagree Please explain your choice in Question 2: SR-3090 Greensted Road development is Green Belt. Other main highways need to be developed i.e. between Harlow and North weald. If Ongar has to have a percentage of houses it needs to be where the infrastructure is. One of the main reasons for us all to live in Ongar is the village appeal. Developments need to be where industrial development is. Response to the Draft Local Plan Consultation 2016 (Regulation 18) Stakeholder ID 4806 Name Bruce Banks 1 3. Do you agree with the proposals for development around Harlow? Disagree Please explain your choice in Question 3: We totally disagree. There is plenty of brownfield sites around Harlow and infrastructure in place for access to M11/M25 + Stansted thus reducing the infrastructure costs. There is no need to look further afield to areas like Chipping Ongar and Greensted. 4. Do you agree with the proposed shopping area in… Epping? Buckhurst Hill? Loughton Broadway? Chipping Ongar? No Loughton High Road? Waltham Abbey? Please explain your choice in Question 4: We are not in agreement with this proposal. Ongar is a small village / town. It CANNOT cope with any more shops. Added to this they will not survive with the likes of Harlow, Chelmsford, Lakeside and Bluewater. The primary school will not cope with the proposed 600+ houses. Car parking is an issue in the town, Where will all the cars park??? Ongar town centre is very historical, very traditional and has character. THIS NEEDS TO BE KEPT FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS! 5. Do you agree with the proposals for new employment development? No opinion Please explain your choice in Question 5: This is down to you. If you are going develop existing employment sites along the M11/M25 corridor this is using the infrastructure in place. Can't really comment on "together with the allocation of new sites". WHERE??? Not enough information. Response to the Draft Local Plan Consultation 2016 (Regulation 18) Stakeholder ID 4806 Name Bruce Banks 2 6. Do you agree with the proposed sites in your area? Epping (Draft Policy P 1): Please provide reasons for your view on Epping: Loughton (Draft Policy P 2) Please provide reasons for your view on Loughton: Waltham Abbey (Draft Policy P 3) Please provide reasons for your view on Waltham Abbey: Chipping Ongar (Draft Policy P 4) No Please provide reasons for your view on Chipping Ongar: We are NOT in agreement with this proposal. The infrastructure will not cope with the additional traffic. The bottom of Ongar "The Borough" will grind to a halt! The country road around SR-0390 "Greensted Road Development" will end up like a "rat run". This will create major safety issues by the primary school. Development in Chipping Ongar will leave schools unable to cope and the health Centre (at present is difficult to get appointments). As residents of ….Redacted…. development' we purchased some land back in 2012 to try and preserve some of the Greensted Parish. We understand that ALL land owners were asked about their land. As the FFRA (Fairfield and Fairbank Residents Association) - 16 members - why were none of us asked?? You have identified sites in Ongar, most are unsuitable due to infrastructure (lack of roads, schools, healthcare). Not to mention the decline of historical sites. Additional pollution to the wooden structure of Greensted Church. Damage to Green Belt land. Increased crime due to no police station. You say the sites are available?? we were told at the exhibition that the land owners were contacted by the EDFC. As already stated NONE of the FFRA members (16 in total) WERE EVER CONTACTED! Your council representatives said they had contacted the Land Registry?? We have contacted the Land registry and they have confirmed that they have 16 land owners for part of this development. Please remove our plots of land from this development. Buckhurst Hill (Draft Policy P 5) Please provide reasons for your view on Buckhurst Hill: North Weald Bassett (Draft Policy P 6) Please provide reasons for your view on North Weald Bassett: Chigwell (Draft Policy P 7) Please provide reasons for your view on North Weald Bassett: Theydon Bois (Draft Policy P 8) Please provide reasons for your view on Theydon Bois: Roydon (Draft Policy P 9) Please provide reasons for your view on Roydon: Nazeing (Draft Policy P 10) Please provide reasons for your view on Nazeing: Thornwood (Draft Policy P 11) Please provide reasons for your view on Thornwood: Coopersale, Fyfield, High Ongar, Lower Sheering, Moreton, Sewardstonbury, Sheering, Stapleford Abbots (Draft Policy P 12) Response to the Draft Local Plan Consultation 2016 (Regulation 18) Stakeholder ID 4806 Name Bruce Banks 3 Please provide reasons for your view on Coopersale, Fyfield, High Ongar, Lower Sheering, Moreton, Sewardstonbury, Sheering, Stapleford Abbots: 7. Do you agree with the approach to infrastructure provision being proposed in the plan? Strongly disagree Please explain your choice in Question 7: There is NO plans and infrastructure in these plans. What's happening with the Ongar-Epping railway? Two of our members couldn't get their children into Chipping Ongar Primary School this year. How is the school going to cope with an additional 600 houses? We asked about by-passes around Ongar (this has been on the cards for years!). We were told that Essex County Council couldn't afford it. WHAT A MESS! 8. An Interim Sustainability Appraisal has been commissioned to support the Draft Local Plan. We would welcome any comments you may have on this. As above - WHAT A MESS! Another layer of bureaucracy. Does this mean we (FFRA members) will now be asked if we want our land built on? 9. Do you wish to comment on any other policies in the Draft Local Plan? As members of the FFRA (16 in total) our members who attended the exhibition were told by council members (EFDC) if a land owner says no to development, plans will be amended. Please take this as written confirmation that as we own part of the "Greensted Road" development. We do NOT want our land built on. (See attached group response form) Response to the Draft Local Plan Consultation 2016 (Regulation 18) Stakeholder ID 4806 Name Bruce Banks 4 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • © Georgina Green ~ Epping Forest Though the Ages
    © Georgina Green ~ Epping Forest though the Ages Epping Forest Preface On 6th May 1882 Queen Victoria visited High Beach where she declared through the Ages "it gives me the greatest satisfaction to dedicate this beautiful Forest to the use and enjoyment of my people for all time" . This royal visit was greeted with great enthusiasm by the thousands of people who came to see their by Queen when she passed by, as their forefathers had done for other sovereigns down through the ages . Georgina Green My purpose in writing this little book is to tell how the ordinary people have used Epping Fo rest in the past, but came to enjoy it only in more recent times. I hope to give the reader a glimpse of what life was like for those who have lived here throughout the ages and how, by using the Forest, they have physically changed it over the centuries. The Romans, Saxons and Normans have each played their part, while the Forest we know today is one of the few surviving examples of Medieval woodland management. The Tudor monarchs and their courtiers frequently visited the Forest, wh ile in the 18th century the grandeur of Wanstead House attracted sight-seers from far and wide. The common people, meanwhile, were mostly poor farm labourers who were glad of the free produce they could obtain from the Forest. None of the Forest ponds are natural . some of them having been made accidentally when sand and gravel were extracted . while others were made by Man for a variety of reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Highways and Transportation Department Page 1 List Produced Under Section 36 of the Highways Act
    Highways and Transportation Department Page 1 List produced under section 36 of the Highways Act. DISTRICT NAME: EPPING Information Correct at : 01-APR-2018 PARISH NAME: ABBESS BEAUCHAMP AND BERNERS RODING ROAD NAME LOCATION STATUS ABBESS ROAD CLASS III ANCHOR LANE UNCLASSIFIED BERNERS RODING ROAD UNCLASSIFIED BERWICK LANE ABBESS BEAUCHAMP UNCLASSIFIED BIRDS GREEN CLASS III DUKES LANE UNCLASSIFIED DUNMOW ROAD ABBESS BEAUCHAMP B ROAD FRAYES CHASE PRIVATE ROAD GREEN HILL ROAD CLASS III HURDLE LANE UNCLASSIFIED PARKERS FARM LANE UNCLASSIFIED SCHOOL LANE CLASS III SCHOOL LANE UNCLASSIFIED SNOWS FARM LANE UNCLASSIFIED WAPLES MILL FARM ROAD ABBESS BEAUCHAMP CLASS III WAPLES MILL ROAD ABBESS BEAUCHAMP CLASS III WOODEND LANE UNCLASSIFIED TOTAL 17 Highways and Transportation Department Page 2 List produced under section 36 of the Highways Act. DISTRICT NAME: EPPING Information Correct at : 01-APR-2018 PARISH NAME: BOBBINGWORTH ROAD NAME LOCATION STATUS ASHLYNS LANE UNCLASSIFIED BLAKE HALL ROAD CLASS III BOBBINGWORTH MILL BOBBINGWORTH UNCLASSIFIED BRIDGE ROAD CLASS III EPPING ROAD A ROAD GAINSTHORPE ROAD UNCLASSIFIED HOBBANS FARM ROAD BOBBINGWORTH UNCLASSIFIED LOWER BOBBINGWORTH GREEN UNCLASSIFIED MORETON BRIDGE CLASS III MORETON ROAD CLASS III MORETON ROAD UNCLASSIFIED NEWHOUSE LANE UNCLASSIFIED PEDLARS END UNCLASSIFIED PENSON'S LANE UNCLASSIFIED STONY LANE UNCLASSIFIED TOTAL 15 Highways and Transportation Department Page 3 List produced under section 36 of the Highways Act. DISTRICT NAME: EPPING Information Correct at : 01-APR-2018 PARISH NAME:
    [Show full text]
  • Hertfordshire & Essex List of Affected Streets
    Water Supply Problems- Hertfordshire & Essex List of affected streets: ABBESS ROAD CHAPEL FIELDS FULLERS MEAD KILN ROAD ABBEY CLOSE CHAPEL LANE FYFIELD ROAD KING HENRYS WALK ALEXANDER MEWS CHELMSFORD ROAD GAINSTHORPE ROAD KINGS WOOD PARK ALLMAINS CLOSE CHESTNUT WALK GARNON MEAD KINGSDON LANE ANCHOR LANE CHEVELY CLOSE GEORGE AVEY CROFT KINGSTON FARM ROAD ARAGON MEWS CHURCH LANE GIBB CROFT LABURNUM ROAD ARCHER CLOSE CHURCH ROAD GIBSON CLOSE LAKE VIEW ARCHERS CLATTERFORD END CUT GLOVERS LANE LANCASTER ROAD ARDLEY CRESCENT COLEMANS FARM LANE GOULD CLOSE LARKSWOOD ASHLYNS LANE COLEMANS LANE GRANVILLE ROAD LATTON COMMON ROAD BACK LANE COLVERS GREEN CLOSE LATTON GREEN BASSETT GARDENS COMMON ROAD GREEN FARM LANE LATTON HOUSE BEAMISH CLOSE COMMONSIDE ROAD GREEN HILL ROAD LATTON STREET BEAUFORT CLOSE COOPERSALE COMMON GREEN LANE LAUNDRY LANE BELCHERS LANE CRIPSEY AVENUE GREENMAN ROAD LITTLE LAVER ROAD BENTLEYS CROSS LEES LANE GREENS FARM LANE LODGE HALL BERECROFT CUNNINGHAM RISE GREENSTED CHURCH LANE LONDON ROAD BERWICK LANE DOWNHALL ROAD GREENSTED ROAD LONG WOOD BETTS LANE DUCK LANE GREENWAYS LOWER BOBBINGWORTH BIRCH VIEW DUKES CLOSE HAMPDEN CLOSE GREEN BLACKHORSE LANE DUNMOW ROAD HARLOW COMMON MALTINGS HILL BLAKE HALL ROAD ELIZABETH CLOSE HARLOW ROAD MANDEVILLE CLOSE BLENHEIM SQUARE ELM CLOSE HARRISON DRIVE MARKWELL WOOD BLENHEIM WAY ELM GARDENS HASTINGWOOD PARK MATCHING GREEN BLUEMANS ELMBRIDGE HALL HASTINGWOOD ROAD MATCHING LANE BLUEMANS END EMBERSON WAY HAWKS HILL MATCHING ROAD BOBBINGWORTH MILL EMBLEYS FARM ROAD HIGH ROAD MATCHING TYE ROAD
    [Show full text]
  • E1.1 Overview of Assessment of Traveller Sites
    Epping Forest District Council Epping Forest District Local Plan Report on Site Selection E1.1 Overview of Assessment of Traveller Sites | Issue | September 2016 Appendix E1.1 Site proceeds at this stage Overview of Assessment of Traveller Sites Site does not proeed at this stage This stage is not applicable for this site Settlement (Sites Site Ref Address Parish proceeding to Stage 4 Promoted Use Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5 Stage 6 Justification only) Abbess Beauchamp AB 581 Adjoining Woodyhyde, Cockerills Cottage and Fairlands Traveller Site is too close to existing residential property. and Berners Roding Abbess Beauchamp AB 582 Adjoining Anchor House Traveller Site is too close to existing residential property. and Berners Roding Abbess Beauchamp Site is too close to existing residential properties and lacks AB 583 Between The Rodings and Brick Kiln, Anchor Lane Traveller and Berners Roding defined boundary. Abbess Beauchamp AB 584 Adjoining The Rodings, Anchor Lane Traveller Site is too close to existing residential property. and Berners Roding Abbess Beauchamp AB 585 Adjoining Brick Kiln, Anchor Lane Traveller Site is too close to existing residential property. and Berners Roding Abbess Beauchamp AB 586 Adjoining Brick Cottage, Anchor Lane Traveller Site is too close to existing residential property. and Berners Roding Abbess Beauchamp AB 587 West of Berwick House Traveller Site is too close to existing residential property. and Berners Roding Adjoining Berwick House and another residential Abbess Beauchamp AB 588 Traveller Site is too close to existing residential property. property and Berners Roding Adjoining Berwick House and another residential Abbess Beauchamp AB 589 Traveller Site is too close to existing residential property.
    [Show full text]
  • DRIVING INSTRUCTIONS 2019 Map Data
    GREEN BELT RELAY – DRIVING INSTRUCTIONS 20 22 Map data from www.openstreetmap.org Stage 1 – Hampton Court – KT8 9AS Park here Toilets here Briefing and start here RACE TRAFFIC: Leg 1 - Hampton Court to Staines Apart from cycles, traffic cannot follow runners along the tow-path from Hampton Court. Instead follow A308 west towards Staines. To get straight to end of leg. Follow A308 to Staines. Follow main road through and around town centre. Turn right at T-junction (Thames Lodge Hotel in front of you). You can park in 1) the River Carpark on your left or, 2) follow road for 400 metres. Turn right, at traffic lights, into Bridge Street and immediately left into Bridge Carpark. To support runners. Sunbury, Shepperton Old Village. In centre of village (at 6.5 miles) do not follow runners to river - there's no through road. Instead continue to T-junction and left along B375 to Chertsey Bridge. Stage 2 – Staines – TW18 4BU Stage 2 briefing and start Stage 1 finish Park here RACE TRAFFIC: Leg 2 - Staines to Boveney. Parking in Staines is at the Bridge Street car park or the River car park (both are pay & display). To get to end of leg. Cross Thames using Staines Bridge. At roundabout, just after bridge, take third exit. Follow A308 through Runnymede and Windsor. Then join A332 to Eton (signed Eton and Slough). After crossing river take exit to Eton and follow signs to Eton. In the centre of Eton you will come to traffic lights (narrow streets, school is all around you).
    [Show full text]
  • ESSEX. Chipplng ONGAR
    DffiECTORY.] ESSEX. CHIPPlNG ONGAR. 261 Jones Henry Edward esq. Marden Ash house, High Ongar Rural Sanitary Authority. Jump James esq. Blake hall, Bobbingwo:rth, Ongar Meets at the Town hall on every alternate tuesday at 12 Pelly Leonard esq. Bowes, Ongar noon. Price Rowel John James esq. B.A. Greensted hall, Ongar Clerk, Charles Smith, High Ongar White Tyndale esq. Stondon Place, Ongar Treasurer, Robert Woodhouse, Chelmsford Clerk to the Magistrates, Charles Smith, Landview house, Medical Officer of Health, Jn. Cooper Quennell,Brentwood Marden Ash, High Ongar Sanitary Inspector, Ernest Joseph Thomas, High Ongar School Attendance Committee consists of a committee Petty Sessions are held at the Petty Sessions room, Police appointed by the board of guardians & of which Rev. L. station, every saturday at u.3o a.m. The places in­ N. Prance is chairman cluded in Ongar petty sessional division are the same as Meets at the Town Hall on every alternate tuesday at the Union, except Doddinghurst & Theydon Mount II a.m. Ongar Union. Clerk, Charles Smith, High Ongar Inquiry & School Attendance Officer, Ernest Joseph Board day every alternate tuesday at the Town Hall at Thomas n a.m. Public Establishments:- The Union comprises twenty-six parishes, viz. Abbots Rooth­ Ancient Order of Foresters, Court Forest hall, No. 2050, C. ing, Beauchamp Roothing, Berners Roothing, Blackmore, J. Lacey, sec Bobbingworth, Chipping Ongar, Doddinghurst, Fyfield, Budworth Hall, William Grout, caretaker Greensted, High Laver, High Ongar, Kelvedon Hatch, Cemetery, Alfred Hall, clerk to the burial board Lambourne, Little Laver, Moreton, Navestock, Nurton Fire Brigade, H. B. Brown, superintendent; Christopher :Mandeville, Shelley, Shellow Bowells, Stanford Rivers, Ely, engineer, & seven men; a fire escape was presented Stapleford Abbots, Stapleford Tawney, Stondon Massey, in 1889 by H.
    [Show full text]
  • Highways and Transportation Department Page 1 List Produced Under Section 36 of the Highways Act
    Highways and Transportation Department Page 1 List produced under section 36 of the Highways Act. DISTRICT NAME: EPPING Information Correct at : 01-APR-2020 PARISH NAME: ABBESS BEAUCHAMP AND BERNERS RODING ROAD NAME LOCATION STATUS ABBESS ROAD CLASS III ANCHOR LANE UNCLASSIFIED BERNERS RODING ROAD UNCLASSIFIED BERWICK LANE ABBESS BEAUCHAMP UNCLASSIFIED BIRDS GREEN CLASS III DUKES LANE UNCLASSIFIED DUNMOW ROAD ABBESS BEAUCHAMP B ROAD FRAYES CHASE PRIVATE ROAD GREEN HILL ROAD CLASS III HURDLE LANE UNCLASSIFIED PARKERS FARM LANE UNCLASSIFIED SCHOOL LANE CLASS III SCHOOL LANE UNCLASSIFIED SNOWS FARM LANE UNCLASSIFIED WAPLES MILL FARM ROAD ABBESS BEAUCHAMP CLASS III WAPLES MILL ROAD ABBESS BEAUCHAMP CLASS III WOODEND LANE UNCLASSIFIED TOTAL 17 Highways and Transportation Department Page 2 List produced under section 36 of the Highways Act. DISTRICT NAME: EPPING Information Correct at : 01-APR-2020 PARISH NAME: BOBBINGWORTH ROAD NAME LOCATION STATUS ASHLYNS LANE UNCLASSIFIED BLAKE HALL ROAD CLASS III BOBBINGWORTH MILL BOBBINGWORTH UNCLASSIFIED BRIDGE ROAD CLASS III EPPING ROAD A ROAD GAINSTHORPE ROAD UNCLASSIFIED HOBBANS FARM ROAD BOBBINGWORTH UNCLASSIFIED LOWER BOBBINGWORTH GREEN UNCLASSIFIED MORETON BRIDGE CLASS III MORETON ROAD UNCLASSIFIED MORETON ROAD CLASS III NEWHOUSE LANE UNCLASSIFIED PEDLARS END UNCLASSIFIED PENSON'S LANE UNCLASSIFIED STONY LANE UNCLASSIFIED TOTAL 15 Highways and Transportation Department Page 3 List produced under section 36 of the Highways Act. DISTRICT NAME: EPPING Information Correct at : 01-APR-2020 PARISH NAME:
    [Show full text]
  • The Daylighting of the Stave Church of Borgund 2
    THEDAYLIGHTINGOFTHESTAVE CHURCHOFBORGUND KPMANSFIELD UCL Bartlett School of Graduate Studies, Central House, 14 Upper Woburn Place, London WC1H 0NN. Introduction [email protected] The stave churches are Norway’s unique contribution to “the chal- lenge of the medieval church”. [1] (Figure 1). 1. Bugge G. Stave-churches in Norway, How did architecture, structure and daylighting combine to Dreyers Forlag A/S, Oslo (1983) p14. reinforce the liturgy in the early church? This paper attempts to show that the true spirit of Nordic light- ing is to be found in the original medieval church. In winter, a mys- tic quality in the interior, associated with ritual, is achieved when the “weak light is split by roof work and sinks like a dim atmo- sphere into the room”. [2] I demonstrate how“if the door is left open, as it commonly was in summer, then the whole space is lit up”. [3] Figure 1: Borgund stave church (www. Such architecture has been designed to reinforce the religious wondermondo.com/Norway.htm [CC message being conveyed. The daylighting of the church is mod- BY-SA 2.0) ulated by the architecture, itself a manifestation, technically, of a 2. Norberg-Schulz C. Nightlands: Nordic Building. The MIT Press (1996) p80 citing certain set of cultural and social imperatives. The interaction of Hansen M A. Orm go Tyr. (1959) p377. structure, material and texture is a complex one. Why did the mas- 3. Blindheim M. The Stave Church Paint- ter craftsmen who built these churches build them the way they ings: Medieval Art from Norway.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Profile for the United Benefice of St Mary the Virgin Theydon Bois
    Parish Profile for the United Benefice of St Mary the Virgin Theydon Bois & All Saints Theydon Garnon and the Parish of St Michael’s Theydon Mount with St Mary’s Stapleford Tawney Contents Overview of Parishes and Clergy Profile 3 St Mary’s Church, Theydon Bois 5 All Saints’ Church, Theydon Garnon 11 St Michael’s Church, Theydon Mount with St Mary’s Church, Stapleford Tawney 16 The Deanery of Epping Forest and Ongar 18 Accounts: St Mary’s Church, Theydon Bois 20 All Saints’ Church, Theydon Garnon 23 St Michael’s Church, Theydon Mount with St Mary’s Church, Stapleford Tawney 27 2 Overview of Parishes and Clergy Profile Introduction tions are committed to developing their churches and reaching out to their communi- Our new incumbent will be taking re- ties in mission and ministry. We are excited sponsibility for the Joint Benefice of All by what lies ahead for our churches and hope Saints Theydon Garnon and St Mary the Vir- to build on the good work already being un- gin Theydon Bois, and will also be leading dertaken in support of our mission state- the joint parish of St Michael’s Theydon ments. We face different challenges in our Mount and St Mary the Virgin Stapleford quest to serve God in each community, whilst Tawney. This joint parish has a single con- promoting the Christian faith. gregation which worships alternate weeks at the two churches and is currently in a differ- ent Benefice. It sounds complicated but it is Overall Aims not! In short: The overall future aims of the group one Benefice, can be summarised as follows: three Parishes, Taking forward the goals of Transform- three congregations, ing Presence, the Diocesan strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Epping Forest District Questionnaire for Essex County Council
    Epping Forest District Questionnaire for Essex County Council Local Bus Network Review Consultation August 2016 Background In 2015 Essex County Council (ECC) began a thorough review of its financial support for those local bus services that it pays for across the County. This consultation is the start of the second part of the review and looks at 70 services across Essex where the current contract ends in 2017. We have grouped together services by geographical area of the County so it is easy to see whether your service is part of the review. Most bus services in Essex are run by commercial operators. The County Council’s role is to decide, where the commercial operators do not provide a service, whether one is needed and if it determines that one is, then to provide it. To help make this decision ECC looks at many factors including what alternatives are available, how many people use them and whether they offer value for money. The Council will not normally continue to support a service where it pays the operator £5.00 or more per passenger carried after all revenue (from fares of all types including the concessionary bus pass scheme) has been taken into account. This is the Cost Per Passenger Journey (CPPJ). A number of the services in this review were last tendered in 2009/10 and the prices agreed then are therefore relatively low compared to prices today. In addition ECC has not increased many of its fares since 2009. As a result a number of bus services in this review are currently close to or exceeding the £5.00 CPPJ upper support limit and are very likely to exceed it after tender.
    [Show full text]
  • These Minutes Not Yet Confirmed Loughton Town Council
    Planning and Licensing Committee 5 July 2021 THESE MINUTES NOT YET CONFIRMED LOUGHTON TOWN COUNCIL PLANNING AND LICENSING COMMITTEE MINUTES of the Meeting held on Monday 5 July 2021 at 7.45pm at Loughton Library & Town Hall Committee Members: Councillors: T Downing (in the Chair) P Abraham C Davies S Murphy K Rainbow J Riley G Wiskin Officers: Mark Squire (Town Clerk) Debra Paris (Planning Committee Clerk) 4 Members of the Public. The Committee agreed to bring forward planning application, EPF/1581/21 - Loughton Town Council Cemetery, Land to rear of Church Lane, after agenda item 3, Confirmation of Minutes, as members of the public were interested in this application. PL21 Apologies for Absence No apologies for absence were received. PL22 Declarations of Interest Cllr Murphy declared a non-pecuniary interest in item 5.2, planning application, EPF/1656/21, 16 Station Road, as the applicant was known to her. She would not comment on this application. Cllr Wiskin declared a non-pecuniary interest in planning applications, EPF/1499/21, Oak View School, as he lives nearby; and EPF/1575/21, 71 Roundmead Avenue, as the applicant was a friend. Cllr Davies declared a non-pecuniary interest in planning application EPF/1536/21, 9 Colebrook Gardens, as she is acquainted with the applicant. The Town Clerk and the Committee declared a non-pecuniary interest in planning application EPF/1581/21, Loughton Town Council Cemetery, Land to rear of Church Lane as Loughton Town Council was the applicant and owns this land. The Committee declared a non-pecuniary interest in planning applications EPF/1453/21, 55 The Drive; EPF/1489/21, 70 Deepdene Road; EPF/1499/21, Oak View School, Whitehills Road; EPF/EPF/1551/21, 82 Algers Road; EPF/1591/21, 31 Carroll Hill; and EPF/1593/21, 9 Kingsley Road, owing to comments received from the LRA Plans Group.
    [Show full text]
  • LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES EPPING FOREST CLA/077 Page 1 Reference Description Dates STATUTORY and LEGAL PAPERS RELATING TO
    LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 EPPING FOREST CLA/077 Reference Description Dates STATUTORY AND LEGAL PAPERS RELATING TO PARLIAMENTARY BILLS AND ACTS CLA/077/A/01/001 Epping Forest Act 1871 1865 - 1871 Includes: report of the Parliamentary Committee (1871); petition against the Bill (1871); supporting documentation (1871); official notice of public meeting held by Epping Forest Commissioners (May 1872); report of the Open Spaces Committee (1865) inscribed 'Mr Manisty'; Report entitled "Rights of Crown in Tidal Lands and Epping Forest" (1866) 1 file Former reference: CLA/077/01/001/005 CLA/07/01/001/003 Box 1.5 Box 1.3 CLA/077/A/01/002 Epping Forest Act 1872 1872 Includes: copy of Bill; petitions against Bill; proof of the City Solicitor 1 file Former reference: CLA/077/01/001/003 Box 1.3 CLA/077/A/01/003 Epping Forest (no 1) Bill 1872 1872 Includes: copy of Bill; report; petitions against the Bill; memoranda on the amended Bill (2 copies) and reasons against a second reading 1 file Former reference: CLA/077/01/001/005 Box 1.5 CLA/077/A/01/004 Epping Forest (no 1) Bill 1872 and Metage on 1872 Grain (Port of London) Bill 1872: combined reports Includes: petitions against the Bills; minutes of evidence; reports 1 file Former reference: CLA/077/01/001/004 Box 1.4 CLA/077/A/01/005 Metage on Grain (Port of London) Act 1872 1864 - 1872 File includes: copy of Act with manuscript annotations; 2 copies of Bill with manuscript annotations; petitions; minutes of proceedings; reports and correspondence concerning rights of Metage; copy and amended
    [Show full text]