DOCSLIB.ORG

Majors Creek Solar Farm Project Ecological Assessment Report (Mnes)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Majors Creek Solar Farm Project Ecological Assessment Report (Mnes) MAJORS CREEK SOLAR FARM PROJECT ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT (MNES) Edify Energy PO Box 5385 Brendale Q 4500 May 2017 P 0448 899 649 E [email protected] Disclaimer The preparation of this report has been in accordance with the brief provided by the Client and relies upon data collected under limitations, as specified within the report. All findings, conclusions or recommendations contained within the report are based on the aforementioned circumstances and represent the professional opinions of Ecological Survey & Management. The report has been prepared for use by the Client and no responsibility for its use by other parties is accepted by Ecological Survey & Management. If a third party relies upon the facts, content, opinions or subject matter contained in this report without the prior consent of Ecological Survey & Management, the third party assumes all risk and releases and indemnifies Ecological Survey & Management from any loss, damage, claim or liability arising directly or indirectly from the use of or reliance upon this report. Apart from fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part of this report, its attachments or appendices may be reproduced by any process without the prior written consent of Ecological Survey & Management. Document History and Status Document version: 17009 Rpt01c Author(s): Monica Campbell/Meredith Watherston Reviewed by: Chris Hansen Approved by: Steve Marston Signed: Date issued: 25 May 2017 Majors Creek Solar Farm Project Ecological Assessment Report (MNES) Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................... 1 1.1 Study area description .................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of works .............................................................................. 2 1.3 Regulatory framework .................................................................... 2 2 Methods ............................................................................................ 3 2.1 Desktop assessment ...................................................................... 3 2.2 Field methods ............................................................................... 3 2.2.1 Flora methods .......................................................................... 3 2.2.2 Fauna methods ........................................................................ 4 2.3 Likelihood of occurrence assessment ................................................ 5 2.3.1 Ecological community assessment .............................................. 5 2.3.2 Significant species assessment ................................................... 5 2.4 Limitations .................................................................................... 6 3 Ecological values of the study area ........................................................ 7 3.1 Desktop results ............................................................................. 7 3.2 Field survey .................................................................................. 7 3.2.1 Vegetation communities ............................................................ 7 3.2.2 Fauna habitat values ................................................................ 9 3.2.3 Connectivity values ................................................................ 10 4 Matters of national environmental significance ...................................... 12 4.1 Threatened ecological communities ................................................ 12 4.2 Threatened flora .......................................................................... 12 4.3 Threatened fauna ........................................................................ 12 4.3.1 Black-throated Finch ............................................................... 14 Species overview ........................................................................... 14 Presence in the Townsville region ..................................................... 16 Presence in the local area ............................................................... 16 Presence in the study area .............................................................. 17 4.3.2 Koala .................................................................................... 18 4.3.3 Bare-rumped Sheath-tail Bat ................................................... 24 Species overview ........................................................................... 24 Presence in the study area .............................................................. 24 4.3.4 Squatter Pigeon ..................................................................... 25 Species overview ........................................................................... 25 Presence in the study area .............................................................. 25 Ecological Survey & Management 17009 Rpt01c i Majors Creek Solar Farm Project Ecological Assessment Report (MNES) 4.4 Migratory species ......................................................................... 25 5 Matters of state environmental significance .......................................... 28 5.1 Regulated vegetation ................................................................... 28 5.2 Threatened and near threatened flora ............................................. 28 5.3 Threatened and special least concern fauna ..................................... 28 5.4 Connectivity areas ....................................................................... 29 6 Opportunities for habitat enhancement ................................................ 30 7 Summary ........................................................................................ 32 8 References ...................................................................................... 34 List of Tables Table 1: Criteria to assess potential for significant species to occur in the study area ............................................................................... 5 Table 2: Field-validated REs in the study area ........................................... 8 Table 3: Koala habitat appraisal for the study area .................................. 21 List of Figures Figure 1: Locality map .......................................................................... 42 Figure 2: Majors Creek study area .......................................................... 43 Figure 3: Field-validated vegetation mapping ........................................... 44 Figure 4: Photos points ......................................................................... 45 Figure 5: Black-throated Finch habitat mapping ....................................... 46 Figure 6: Koala habitat mapping ............................................................ 47 Figure 7: Squatter Pigeon habitat mapping .............................................. 48 Appendices Appendix A: EPBC Act Protected Matters Search Report Appendix B: Wildlife Online database search results Appendix C: Regulated vegetation map Appendix D: Flora Survey trigger map Appendix E: Likelihood of occurrence table Ecological Survey & Management 17009 Rpt01c ii Majors Creek Solar Farm Project Ecological Assessment Report (MNES) Symbols and Abbreviations * (Preceding a plant species name) plant species not native to Australia ± With or without, more or less AS Acceptable solution BAMM Biodiversity Assessment and Mapping Methodology Biosecurity Act (Queensland) Biosecurity Act 2014 BoM Bureau of Meteorology BPA Biodiversity Planning Assessment CI Crown Intercept DSITI Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation DoEE (Commonwealth) Department of the Environment and Energy EDL Ecologically Dominant Layer EEM Ecological Equivalence Methodology EHP (Queensland) Department of Environment and Heritage Protection EO Act (Queensland) Environmental Offsets Act 2014 EPBC Act (Commonwealth) Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 GPS Global positioning system ha Hectares km Kilometres MCU Material change of use ML Mining lease MLES Matters of local environmental significance (EO Act) MNES Matters of national environmental significance (EPBC Act) MSES Matters of state environmental significance (EO Act) NC Act (Queensland) Nature Conservation Act 1992 NC Regulation (Queensland) Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006 NRM (Queensland) Department of Natural Resources and Mines PFC Projective Foliage Cover PO Performance outcome QEOP Queensland Environmental Offsets Policy 2014 RE Regional Ecosystem as defined under the Queensland Vegetation Ecological Survey & Management 17009 Rpt01c iii Majors Creek Solar Farm Project Ecological Assessment Report (MNES) Management Regulation 2000 REDD Regional Ecosystem Description Database SPRAT Species Profile and Threats Database TEC Threatened Ecological Community TSSC Threatened Species Scientific Committee VM Act (Queensland) Vegetation Management Act 1999 WoNS Weeds of National Significance Ecological Survey & Management 17009 Rpt01c iv Majors Creek Solar Farm Project Ecological Assessment Report (MNES) Glossary Term Definition Biodiversity This is an EHP classification dependent on condition of remnant Status vegetation in addition to the criteria used to determine class under the Queensland Vegetation Management Act 1999. This classification is used for a range of planning and management applications, i.e. to determine environmentally sensitive areas. A regional ecosystem
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conservation Advice and Transferred This Species from the Endangered to Vulnerable Category, Effective from 04/07/2019
    THREATENED SPECIES SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Established under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 The Minister approved this conservation advice and transferred this species from the Endangered to Vulnerable category, effective from 04/07/2019 Conservation Advice Litoria dayi (Lace-eyed Tree Frog) Taxonomy Conventionally accepted as Litoria dayi (Gunther 1897). Litoria dayi (Lace-eyed Tree Frog) was recently transferred to the genus Litoria from the genus Nyctimystes after Kraus (2013) showed that it did not meet the morphological characteristics for assignment to that genus (Cogger 2014). Summary of assessment Conservation status Vulnerable: Criterion 2 B1 and B2 (a),(b)(i,ii) The highest category for which Litoria dayi is eligible to be listed is Vulnerable. Litoria dayi has been found to be eligible for listing under the following categories: Criterion 2: B1 and B2 (a),(b)(i,ii): Vulnerable Litoria dayi has been found to be eligible for listing under the Vulnerable category. The species was eligible for listing under the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (1999) (EPBC Act) as on 16 July 2000 it was listed as Endangered under Schedule 1 of the preceding Act, the Endangered Species Protection Act 1992 (Cwlth). Following a formal review of the listing status of the Lace-eyed Tree Frog, the Threatened Species Scientific Committee (the Committee) has determined that there is evidence that the species has stabilised but has not undergone any demonstrable recovery since being listed; and that there is sufficient evidence to support a change of status of the species to Vulnerable under the EPBC Act but not to delist the species.
    [Show full text]
  • Brooklyn, Cloudland, Melsonby (Gaarraay)
    BUSH BLITZ SPECIES DISCOVERY PROGRAM Brooklyn, Cloudland, Melsonby (Gaarraay) Nature Refuges Eubenangee Swamp, Hann Tableland, Melsonby (Gaarraay) National Parks Upper Bridge Creek Queensland 29 April–27 May · 26–27 July 2010 Australian Biological Resources Study What is Contents Bush Blitz? Bush Blitz is a four-year, What is Bush Blitz? 2 multi-million dollar Abbreviations 2 partnership between the Summary 3 Australian Government, Introduction 4 BHP Billiton and Earthwatch Reserves Overview 6 Australia to document plants Methods 11 and animals in selected properties across Australia’s Results 14 National Reserve System. Discussion 17 Appendix A: Species Lists 31 Fauna 32 This innovative partnership Vertebrates 32 harnesses the expertise of many Invertebrates 50 of Australia’s top scientists from Flora 62 museums, herbaria, universities, Appendix B: Threatened Species 107 and other institutions and Fauna 108 organisations across the country. Flora 111 Appendix C: Exotic and Pest Species 113 Fauna 114 Flora 115 Glossary 119 Abbreviations ANHAT Australian Natural Heritage Assessment Tool EPBC Act Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth) NCA Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Queensland) NRS National Reserve System 2 Bush Blitz survey report Summary A Bush Blitz survey was conducted in the Cape Exotic vertebrate pests were not a focus York Peninsula, Einasleigh Uplands and Wet of this Bush Blitz, however the Cane Toad Tropics bioregions of Queensland during April, (Rhinella marina) was recorded in both Cloudland May and July 2010. Results include 1,186 species Nature Refuge and Hann Tableland National added to those known across the reserves. Of Park. Only one exotic invertebrate species was these, 36 are putative species new to science, recorded, the Spiked Awlsnail (Allopeas clavulinus) including 24 species of true bug, 9 species of in Cloudland Nature Refuge.
    [Show full text]
  • Araneae, Archaeidae) of Tropical North-Eastern Queensland Zookeys, 2012; 218(218):1-55
    PUBLISHED VERSION Michael G. Rix, and Mark S. Harvey Australian assassins, Part III: a review of the assassin spiders (Araneae, Archaeidae) of tropical north-eastern Queensland ZooKeys, 2012; 218(218):1-55 © Michael G. Rix, Mark S. Harvey. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Originally published at: http://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.218.3662 PERMISSIONS CC BY 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ http://hdl.handle.net/2440/86518 A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 218:Australian 1–55 (2012) Assassins, Part III: A review of the Assassin Spiders (Araneae, Archaeidae)... 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.215.3662 MONOGRAPH www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Australian Assassins, Part III: A review of the Assassin Spiders (Araneae, Archaeidae) of tropical north-eastern Queensland Michael G. Rix1,†, Mark S. Harvey1,2,3,4,‡ 1 Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Perth, We- stern Australia 6986, Australia 2 Research Associate, Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024, USA 3 Research Associate, California Academy of Sciences, 55 Music Concourse Drive, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA 4 Adjunct Professor, School of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia † urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:B7D4764D-B9C9-4496-A2DE-C4D16561C3B3 ‡ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:FF5EBAF3-86E8-4B99-BE2E-A61E44AAEC2C Corresponding author: Michael G.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Emerald Wind Farm, Herberton Range North Queensland
    Mount Emerald Wind Farm, Herberton Range North Queensland Environmental Impact Statement Volume 2 (EPBC 2011/6228) Prepared by: Prepared for: RPS AUSTRALIA EAST PTY LTD RATCH AUSTRALIA CORPORATION LTD 135 Lake Street Level 4, 231 George Street, Cairns Brisbane, Queensland 4870 Queensland, 4001 T: +61 7 4031 1336 T: +61 7 3214 3401 F: +61 7 4031 2942 F: +61 7 3214 3499 E: [email protected] E: [email protected] W: www.ratchaustralia.com Client Manager: Mellissa Jess Report Number: PR100246 / R72846 Version / Date: VA / Volume 2 rpsgroup.com.au Mount Emerald Wind Farm, Herberton Range North Queensland Environmental Impact Statement Volume 2 IMPORTANT NOTE Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, or review as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part of this report, its attachments or appendices may be reproduced by any process without the written consent of RPS Australia East Pty Ltd. All enquiries should be directed to RPS Australia East Pty Ltd. We have prepared this report for the sole purposes of RATCH Australia Corporation Ltd (“Client”) for the specific purpose of only for which it is supplied (“Purpose”). This report is strictly limited to the purpose and the facts and matters stated in it and does not apply directly or indirectly and will not be used for any other application, purpose, use or matter. In preparing this report we have made certain assumptions. We have assumed that all information and documents provided to us by the Client or as a result of a specific request or enquiry were complete, accurate and up-to-date.
    [Show full text]
  • Cairns Regional Council Water and Waste Report for Mulgrave River Aquifer Feasibility Study Flora and Fauna Report
    Cairns Regional Council Water and Waste Report for Mulgrave River Aquifer Feasibility Study Flora and Fauna Report November 2009 Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Scope 1 1.3 Project Study Area 2 2. Methodology 4 2.1 Background and Approach 4 2.2 Demarcation of the Aquifer Study Area 4 2.3 Field Investigation of Proposed Bore Hole Sites 5 2.4 Overview of Ecological Values Descriptions 5 2.5 PER Guidelines 5 2.6 Desktop and Database Assessments 7 3. Database Searches and Survey Results 11 3.1 Information Sources 11 3.2 Species of National Environmental Significance 11 3.3 Queensland Species of Conservation Significance 18 3.4 Pest Species 22 3.5 Vegetation Communities 24 3.6 Regional Ecosystem Types and Integrity 28 3.7 Aquatic Values 31 3.8 World Heritage Values 53 3.9 Results of Field Investigation of Proposed Bore Hole Sites 54 4. References 61 Table Index Table 1: Summary of NES Matters Protected under Part 3 of the EPBC Act 5 Table 2 Summary of World Heritage Values within/adjacent Aquifer Area of Influence 6 Table 3: Species of NES Identified as Occurring within the Study Area 11 Table 4: Summary of Regional Ecosystems and Groundwater Dependencies 26 42/15610/100421 Mulgrave River Aquifer Feasibility Study Flora and Fauna Report Table 5: Freshwater Fish Species in the Mulgrave River 36 Table 6: Estuarine Fish Species in the Mulgrave River 50 Table 7: Description of potential borehole field in Aloomba as of 20th August, 2009. 55 Figure Index Figure 1: Regional Ecosystem Conservation Status and Protected Species Observation 21 Figure 2: Vegetation Communities and Groundwater Dependencies 30 Figure 3: Locations of Study Sites 54 Appendices A Database Searches 42/15610/100421 Mulgrave River Aquifer Feasibility Study Flora and Fauna Report 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment E - Desktop Searches
    Attachment E - Desktop searches EPBC Act Protected Matters Report This report provides general guidance on matters of national environmental significance and other matters protected by the EPBC Act in the area you have selected. Information on the coverage of this report and qualifications on data supporting this report are contained in the caveat at the end of the report. Information is available about Environment Assessments and the EPBC Act including significance guidelines, forms and application process details. Report created: 11/06/20 13:02:49 Summary Details Matters of NES Other Matters Protected by the EPBC Act Extra Information Caveat Acknowledgements This map may contain data which are ©Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Australia), ©PSMA 2010 Coordinates Buffer: 20.0Km Summary Matters of National Environmental Significance This part of the report summarises the matters of national environmental significance that may occur in, or may relate to, the area you nominated. Further information is available in the detail part of the report, which can be accessed by scrolling or following the links below. If you are proposing to undertake an activity that may have a significant impact on one or more matters of national environmental significance then you should consider the Administrative Guidelines on Significance. World Heritage Properties: None National Heritage Places: None Wetlands of International Importance: None Great Barrier Reef Marine Park: None Commonwealth Marine Area: None Listed Threatened Ecological Communities: 4 Listed Threatened Species: 26 Listed Migratory Species: 16 Other Matters Protected by the EPBC Act This part of the report summarises other matters protected under the Act that may relate to the area you nominated.
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Days the Great Tropical Drive
    ITINERARY The Great Tropical Drive Queensland – Cairns Cairns – Cooktown – Mareeba – Undara – Charters Towers – Townsville – Ingham – Tully/Mission Beach – Innisfail – Cairns Drive from Cairns to Townsville, through World Heritage-listed reef and rainforests to golden outback savannah. On this journey you won’t miss an inch of Queensland’s tropical splendour. AT A GLANCE Cruise the Great Barrier Reef and trek the ancient Daintree Rainforest. Connect with Aboriginal culture as you travel north to the remote frontier of Cape Tribulation. Explore historic gold mining towns and the lush orchards and plantations of the Tropical Tablelands. Day trip to Magnetic, Dunk and Hinchinbrook Islands and relax in resort towns like Port Douglas and Mission Beach. This journey has a short 4WD section, with an alternative road for conventional vehicles. > Cairns – Port Douglas (1 hour) > Port Douglas – Cooktown (3 hours) > Cooktown – Mareeba (4.5 hours) DAY ONE > Mareeba – Ravenshoe (1 hour) > Ravenshoe – Undara Volcanic Beach. Continue along the Cook Highway, CAIRNS TO PORT DOUGLAS National Park (2.5 hours) Meander along the golden chain of stopping at Rex Lookout for magical views over the Coral Sea beaches. Drive into the > Undara Volcanic National Park – beaches stretching north from Cairns. Surf Charters Towers (5.5 hours) at Machans Beach and swim at Holloways sophisticated tropical oasis Port Douglas, and palm-fringed Yorkey’s Knob. Picnic which sits between World Heritage-listed > Charters Towers – Townsville (1.5 hours) beneath sea almond trees in Trinity rainforest and reef. Walk along the white Beach or lunch in the tropical village. sands of Four Mile Beach and climb > Townsville – Ingham (1.5 hours) Flagstaff Hill for striking views over Port Hang out with the locals on secluded > Ingham – Cardwell (0.5 hours) Douglas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Direct and Indirect Effects of Predation in a Terrestrial Trophic Web
    This file is part of the following reference: Manicom, Carryn (2010) Beyond abundance: the direct and indirect effects of predation in a terrestrial trophic web. PhD thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/19007 Beyond Abundance: The direct and indirect effects of predation in a terrestrial trophic web Thesis submitted by Carryn Manicom BSc (Hons) University of Cape Town March 2010 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Marine and Tropical Biology James Cook University Clockwise from top: The study site at Ramsey Bay, Hinchinbrook Island, picture taken from Nina Peak towards north; juvenile Carlia storri; varanid access study plot in Melaleuca woodland; spider Argiope aethera wrapping a march fly; mating pair of Carlia rubrigularis; male Carlia rostralis eating huntsman spider (Family Sparassidae). C. Manicom i Abstract We need to understand the mechanism by which species interact in food webs to predict how natural ecosystems will respond to disturbances that affect species abundance, such as the loss of top predators. The study of predator-prey interactions and trophic cascades has a long tradition in ecology, and classical views have focused on the importance of lethal predator effects on prey populations (direct effects on density), and the indirect transmission of effects that may cascade through the system (density-mediated indirect interactions). However, trophic cascades can also occur without changes in the density of interacting species, due to non-lethal predator effects on prey traits, such as behaviour (trait-mediated indirect interactions). Studies of direct and indirect predation effects have traditionally considered predator control of herbivore populations; however, top predators may also control smaller predators.
    [Show full text]
  • Intra and Interspecific Variation in Critical Thermal Minimum and Maximum of Four Species of Anole Lizards (Reptilia: Squamata: Dactyloidae: Anolis)
    INTRA AND INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION IN CRITICAL THERMAL MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM OF FOUR SPECIES OF ANOLE LIZARDS (REPTILIA: SQUAMATA: DACTYLOIDAE: ANOLIS) JHAN CARLOS SALAZAR SALAZAR UNIVERSIDAD ICESI FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS NATURALES, DEPARTAMENTO DE CIENCIAS BIOLÓGICAS BIOLOGÍA SANTIAGO DE CALI 2017 INTRA AND INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION IN CRITICAL THERMAL MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM OF FOUR SPECIES OF ANOLE LIZARDS (REPTILIA: SQUAMATA: DACTYLOIDAE: ANOLIS) JHAN CARLOS SALAZAR SALAZAR TRABAJO DE GRADO PARA OPTAR AL TÍTULO DE PREGRADO EN BIOLOGÍA DIRECTORA: MARÍA DEL ROSARIO CASTAÑEDA, Ph. D. DIRECTOR: GUSTAVO ADOLFO LONDOÑO, Ph. D. TRABAJO DE GRADO PARA OPTAR AL TÍTULO DE PREGRADO EN BIOLOGÍA SANTIAGO DE CALI 2017 SANTIAGO DE CALI, MIÉRCOLES, 08 DE AGOSTO DE 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I give my most sincere thanks to my parents and godparents for their unconditional support throughout the entire process of the completion of this Undergraduate Degree Project. Likewise, I thank my directors María del Rosario Castañeda, Ph.D. and Gustavo A. Londoño, Ph.D. for all their patience support and time they invested to help me, guide me and correct me throughout the process. In addition, I want to thank the Betty Cadena and her family, Don Juan, Gustavo from Parques Nacionales Naturales, Don Bertulfo from DAGMA and those people who made this project possible. Icesi University let us use the field station facilities. Also, I want to thank M. Loaiza and M. Sanchez for their help and guide in R. Finally, I want to thank M. F. Restrepo, C. Cárdenas, C. Estupiñán, S. Muñoz, N. Jimenez, S. Orozco, M. Cantero, L. Gonzales, P. Montes and J. Lizarazo for their help during the field work.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Society of Herpetologists
    1 THE AUSTRALIAN SOCIETY OF HERPETOLOGISTS INCORPORATED NEWSLETTER 48 Published 29 October 2014 2 Letter from the editor This letter finds itself far removed from last year’s ASH conference, held in Point Wolstoncroft, New South Wales. Run by Frank Lemckert and Michael Mahony and their team of froglab strong, the conference featured some new additions including the hospitality suite (as inspired by the Turtle Survival Alliance conference in Tuscon, Arizona though sadly lacking of the naked basketball), egg and goon race and bouncing castle (Simon’s was a deprived childhood), as well as the more traditional elements of ASH such as the cricket match and Glenn Shea’s trivia quiz. May I just add that Glenn Shea wowed everyone with his delightful skin tight, anatomically correct, and multi-coloured, leggings! To the joy of everybody in the world, the conference was opened by our very own Hal Cogger (I love you Hal). Plenary speeches were given by Dale Roberts, Lin Schwarzkopf and Gordon Grigg and concurrent sessions were run about all that is cutting edge in science and herpetology. Of note, award winning speeches were given by Kate Hodges (Ph.D) and Grant Webster (Honours) and the poster prize was awarded to Claire Treilibs. Thank you to everyone who contributed towards an update and Jacquie Herbert for all the fantastic photos. By now I trust you are all preparing for the fast approaching ASH 2014, the 50 year reunion and set to have many treats in store. I am sad to not be able to join you all in celebrating what is sure to be, an informative and fun spectacle.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Administration of the Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Reporting Period 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020)
    Report on the administration of the Nature Conservation Act 1992 (reporting period 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020) Prepared by: Department of Environment and Science © State of Queensland, 2020. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. For more information on this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Disclaimer This document has been prepared with all due diligence and care, based on the best available information at the time of publication. The department holds no responsibility for any errors or omissions within this document. Any decisions made by other parties based on this document are solely the responsibility of those parties. If you need to access this document in a language other than English, please call the Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS National) on 131 450 and ask them to telephone Library Services on +61 7 3170 5470. This publication can be made available in an alternative format (e.g. large print or audiotape) on request for people with vision impairment; phone +61 7 3170 5470 or email <[email protected]>. September 2020 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Nature Conservation Act 1992—departmental administrative responsibilities ............................................................. 1 List of legislation and subordinate legislation ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Project Atlas’, a Coal Seam Gas Field in the Surat Basin
    7 — APPENDICES Appendix C – ERM Ecological Assessment Report Public—24 October 2018 © Jemena Limited Atlas Lateral Project Gas Compression Facility Ecological Assessment Report 0461545_FINAL September 2018 The business of sustainability Atlas Lateral Project Approved by: Dr David Dique Gas Compression Facility Ecological Assessment Report Position: Partner Senex Energy Limited Signed: September 2018 0461545 FINAL Date: 21 September 2018 www.erm.com This disclaimer, together with any limitations specified in the report, apply to use of this report. This report was prepared in accordance with the contracted scope of services for the specific purpose stated and subject to the applicable cost, time and other constraints. In preparing this report, ERM relied on: (a) client/third party information which was not verified by ERM except to the extent required by the scope of services, and ERM does not accept responsibility for omissions or inaccuracies in the client/third party information; and (b) information taken at or under the particular times and conditions specified, and ERM does not accept responsibility for any subsequent changes. This report has been prepared solely for use by, and is confidential to, the client and ERM accepts no responsibility for its use by other persons. This report is subject to copyright protection and the copyright owner reserves its rights. This report does not constitute legal advice. CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT 2 1.2 SCOPE OF THE ASSESSMENT 2 2 RELEVANT LEGISLATION 5 3 ASSESSMENT APPROACH
    [Show full text]