DOCSLIB.ORG

Trialeurodes Vaporariorum West. Chrysoperla Carnea (Steph.)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Trialeurodes Vaporariorum West. Chrysoperla Carnea (Steph.) $%&' "# / ! / / 5 -"* Trialeurodes vaporariorum West. 0 12 34 ,- .-/ +" ( )* 0 12 7)*+ 5 ,- 8 +9 Chrysoperla carnea (Steph.) 6 "4 * $/ 9 ; 5*,9* : ) ,<! C ABC 0 : >0 12 =*6 5 " ) * > 2 ? @ * <) Trialeurodes vaporarioum West. 0 12 34 ,- ,C- 8C +C9 K/ 0 2*,L 5 -"* +IJ/ 04 G H)* 5 .5 +" 3)D4 +" E * ) ) * 5 -"* ., + *+</ 0 / :-> 5 (O+ 0L2 2 P :@ 2M N"1 H 0 Chrysoperla carnea (Steph.) 6 "4 5 R/+/ 0 +2 < > @ 5 0 ,5 6 "4 8+9 .-/ / ! / 8+9 Q / +2 < E > / 5 +2 < > / 8 +9 / 5 M ,> 5 M Y@ ., X* M * WM VU $T Q$U QT ES* CX* 8) C @ *,"* 5 3) 7. ( M Q "4 K/ 5 -"* > / 5 .,)5+2 *+</ 3) $U +> > / +) +" ^ "4 > ) M 5 ) 3) . 5*5 5L *5 [\"]* QN"1 > / H 0 ,5*5 Z) " ., + 8 +9 .-/ / 5 > ) / 8 +9 / 5 M * , A )+./ :@ :L [_9 .,)5+O :@ 5 H !> . ,*5 :@ +" b 5 #a) +IJ/ 0b ,5*5 / 5 H)* ., ,> M * , "# 5 "4 > +2 < / H . , +" :@ :L Q > Z M * WM Q M * , X M 5 "4 > + 8 +9 / C.-/ C/ C* 0C 5C c* */ Q 0 .: *5 5L *5 [\"]* Q / 8 +9 / * +"b +IJ/ / ., ?, *5 5 :@ +" 5 H< 0 )62 H)+/Y G H)+/R 6 "4 8+9 .-/ :)+), Q,- 8+9 Q6 "4 Q0 12 34 ,- : , >D* 34+ &56 0 &7 21 Trialeurodes vaporariorum West. 0 ,. =;0 14 , $.0 89' /":; <+4 ,# %+ >,# ? %4".; $ 9 27 @,7 () *+ ,& '!"# $% .(BD BC BB) (Hom.: Aleyrodidae) &'!"# /01 ' .- >- KO MP' % $7 M' % K1 + M4N $' % +$ K1 +$L G01 HI' % J4 &0 .B $%&' "# / ! / / / $% ORX > .+% 90 $ %& P' $c &0 8N4, &0 M $R , /01 R:' 84 7 8.O S$ &T4# 24 , &'40 $% -') M%1 $7 [:17 29 2(4U >T ": 40 21 .+ "! , M4# &0 -') 2O. &7 21 e 9" ,@7 M4N $4 M%1 4V $% > .+% &;.I &0 $:W , /01 ,4#$+ > .(k) +0 Y. ,@7 2() M%47 & 0 $ 2() ? .+ 84 7 (BB C) Mh & Chrysoperla carnea (Steph.) R1 $0 % Y ; () ? /Z0 84 7 $% (4X .21 29 Y. Y% &0 21 $ %$W40 > 4 '% $% ORX ?.+% 2O( ?0 ' P ,) [,' &". M 7 $% R1 Y; ,@ 7 M4N $:0 40 40 $% R:' 2() 0 , [7 4 $% >) 4.7 \R:' $7 2() *+ .(Bk B) +0 () 9" 24 ,&'40 () ? &0 &'!"# W40 [7 $:0 Y. $% &'# ? M%1 0 &^0 $ $% T , S$ # >,# ? 40 %] &'1) <^1 >%0 ?U Y% &0 , 27 , &'!"# *$ $% /Z0 84 7 , &'40 .N _1 4V` ."] a 4+ &0 b04 , 2% 84 7 , &'40 $% .(BC B) 21 % @+U 4 C) %$ % % () ? ORX > .+% $ .+ R74 Y; e %40$7 ORX > .+% M%1 0 () 9" S$ % e 7d , &7 1$ 4c' &0 ? 40 0 .(BD BC @U 4^W [7 .+ R74 ' 4P% ". .7 40 "7 YN M $ - &0 /Z0 .+ 84 7 <^1 4 &0 $ 2() 2O. ' 0 &7 ORX ?.+% 1,$ % ? G" ' 2:' () ? 2O. 4V @,7 mN '140 Economic Injury Level (EIL) %] > .(Bf) 21 4P 0 84 7 ,S$ 41 0 S$ .(D) 21 2., J74 ' 9" 24 &'40 / g] &0 4 ? 40 0 ># 7 > ( $ Y. &0 & 0 8N 4, &0 2(4U 4W` $% ' ,@7 M4N ORX > .+% $% 9" 84 7 ,& '40 4 &0 &'!"# +0 4 2() ? 44V 84 7 , @7 M4N &0 29 b04 > 4( % ' (BD) , [:1 ' $7 &:0 , [:1 J"i $% &7 Mh &0 .(BB) ? 40 L` p!0 ,&'!"# $% , /0 1 $oN &0 .+ 84 7 S$ % j1 40 () 9" 84 7 , &'!"# +0K r' $L $% & ? $% O^ &7 *q 2- $% & ,S .(Bf) +0 $ 1 /Z0 R1 $0 es 3%1 > pW $% &O^ > 7 ( ) >,'7 / a1 &'!"# /0 1 9" 84 7 40 9" 24 &'40 / J] $% 4V @7 M4N / T 20"^ 0 &^0 $ $% &7 + i) BkQ 81 $% %'7 eI' > 4 $% , /0 1 4P% &'!"# /0 1 84 7 l m7:7 >1' ' @7 M4N > ?4-0 &O^ ? $% . + eI' @,hU ? 21 M' 3% 'W ,$R' 1,$ 0 M 4., (Oxytioquinox) 2O. &"; @7 M4N %40$7 lU R1 $0 1,$ ,[! 0W 84 7 '%.' ,1$40 Aphelinidae .2(4# $ 4] 1$40 %$ 2() #$U ,$R' % O @ ( 0 /01 Y7 4N H,@ ,hU $% .) 21% & 0 Encarsia formosa Gahan 84 7 (C Y9' &0) BnC 81 $% G01 $+ $% O0 >e 5* M4N 0 +U [1 $0 Q Bf 0 &'!"# /01 9( $% g04 4 QQ R49 2N: &0 &'!"# $% @ ) ? m $U $R' $ , QQ 1,$ Y j.4U @7 $% fQtDQ R:' 20X$ % 4# '1 &$% f ± f % .+ S$ # $, &1 $% E. formosa $% $ 2;1 BQ +$ 2;1 BC $' M$% CQ … Trialeurodes vaporariorum West.0 12 34 ,- .-/ +" )* @7M4N %40$7 O0 $ f 4#$+ M%1 $. tC &# O @ ) ? $% >0 M# . + eI' > "# @7M4N %40$7 O0 $ BQ 4#$+ M%1 $. tf 4 '1 CftfQ *$ &0 #40 ntBQ &"N4 $% P'4( @7M4N %40$7 O0 $ Bf 4#$+ M%1 $. tD H,l ]) ) ,N $% M# 4, 1 M%) .%0 @7M4N %40$7 O0 $ Q 4#$+ M%1 $. tk H$ &T$U M+U 4'1 kQ×CQ×CQ %O0 &0 K0T Q/ $I % 0 $'7 M%1 %$ @7M4N eI' @ ) *4+ YR] $ Q B %N ( @ fQ B &0 B 2R:' &0 4#$+ [! 1,$ 4 $% 4 " 0 M ' [, , &0 >v KN + O1 0 $% .%4# &0 @ ) 0 $% .%0 #$U &"N4 $% $+ &0 4#$+ >%47 /% ' $c &0 . %+ M%1 ,$ 4v $% >: a 4+ ,$. 41 (- 4#$v+) % (,+) ~ ,$. 4 G]% &I' 8N ORX a 4+ &0 @ ) a 4+ $c & 0 '+ +U [1 > [, $'L @7 M4N 0 ! % O ?O H 40 2() , M$U w5N 4O] >,# $ [1 $• I0 \'N #%40%0 4#" R:' 2O. ,#) 40 &v"0 . ' eI' M# 4, H$ -') 4, .+ M%1 g' > ; &0 /1U @+U / $I 2O. ?.! @ ) *4+ $% M# 4, H$ 2() , M$U ' ,+ $. $% . + +U 8" &'# $X &0 $ 4v 2() 2O. S$.+ ? $% &L J4 ? &0 . + eI' .+ eI' +U €) , M$U % O P'4( &# H, &x#40 [L \R:' % O 2";&0 O^ j1 40 , [! 4#$+ [! 1,$ $c &0 - $% &7 >0 M# 4, &x#40 &1 2U $% % •0 4L H,&:7 >$% fQ H,&1% $% () "R] $L 0 M%1 0 (?U a1 0) '%0 y"! b9' % O .'+ M% % $ 4] >0 >,# $ () Chrysobag 4, $% , &x#40 Y7 % O &0 & 0 .' + S$.+ 1$40 2O. % O j1 40 $. 4, $% M%1 %$ , [! $% + M% ?.! $ 4 >) $% , M$U 2O. M# .+ ?O [! 1,$ > $% $ 4v 4, $% 2() #$U ?O 4 z4 $% &R1 40 O0 ,S$.+ YR] 2]%& 0 2() M' ,M$U % O &7 J4 ?0 , z40 &x#40 %) &x#40 @+ 2() 2O. 3 ' $% >) O0 $ BQ &O(% 4, $% 4#$v+ [! 1,$ , z40 &x#40 % ^1 ,z 40 &x#40 % 0 $% &7 I') .'+ &R1 S$.+ $. 4, H,$ 4v >$% % 4' $X&0 &0 (% $ &0 ( U YR 8.N $ %40 &'.' , ‚$ ,$. W40 ×B %O0 &0 $ %40 &'.' p! 1U , &:7 $ 5# [! H 40 Y7 34N &0 ,M $U % O KI$ $7 04 MP ) &0 89' lU .'+ M% % $ 4] H^W H4#" 40 2+ % % >0 M# H$ / $ % M' ,M$U % O ?P' M+ S$.+ [! .N % 4c' , z40 2U &R4 4, $% K ) $% % ,&x#40 Y7 % O &0 & 0 .+ &R1 &x#40 m > ;&0 '+ S$.+ % $ $% 1$40 4 , $% 2() 2O. H$ %40 &'.' > $% M# 4, m "7 $X &0 & #$U 2O. M' ]0 .+ M% ?.! $ 4 4, 40 H$ %40&'.' .'+ &(4# 4c' $% -' 2O. $. k 0 (% Y7 r"0 {4X J] $% @ ) &1 $. $% +U [1 (,+) ~ $. $% +U €) :'%0 4 $ 4] &0 ,$. .+ eI' $ 4 BQ 4, ,$. 41 $% 4#$+ 1,$ (- @L M4N) (4#$+ @7 M4N >0) ,+ $. tB %I %40$7 1,$ 4V` + eI' $0 / $ - 4#$+ M%1 $. t ƒ! + eI' O0 O(% $% &L @7 M4N 4#$+ - @7 M4N M%1 $. t CB $%&' "# / ! / / Y+) %0 44V‡ 4P% K9" $. % &0 2R:' K+U [1 $-T ,$. O 9" ,$. $% ?.q $% .%+ $% &7 %0 K"R] H, @,hU „' 40 ` &I' ? .( ?0 . + eI' +U [1 @ ) 0 $% $0 / a9( 2, [,% $ $% $'7 /.:1 @7 M4N 4V` ?40 >) 0 ,$. &"7 $% @ ) > [, *4+ &0 & 0 J4 ? 40 0 .(B) %0 >) %40$7 lU $ BC k &"( $% $% H 1,$ eI' 4c' &L ' 4W` ?(4# 4c' $% $ f H$0 H 1,$ @7 M4N K O $-T $. $% - @L M4N H,$. 0 &:9 $% 9" H,$. H 40 e > , &7 ? Y% &0 K+U [1 O0 +U €) $0 @+ @ ) >U 2+ % % - 4#$v+ $ „ U - 2+ ' % @7 M4N 4V` ?40 4#$v+) % $. $% 1,$ $0 @+ (,+) ~ $. $% 4 z4 %I $% 4.7 4V` 2+5# >) %40$7 „ U (- @L M4N) &1 $. $% +U [1 $0 @+ (- H 1,$ @7 M4N O 2, $. $% . + M, $% 1,$ $0$-T „ U $-T ,$. $% 1,$ $0 4V @,7 2"; &0 ' K+U [1 O0 $ Q H$0 .%4# eI' 2, @+ ,$. (+U [1 lU $ Q O) > ? $% @7M4N @ ( 8.N ,+ Mh &0 ,$. oO0 $% &7 I') 2() 2O. m ] @ ( 40 R1 24( 2+ % % & 2O. "R] 2O. &0 2R:' 2O. 2O. &0 M' ]0 % 4( 2R:' &I' $% &7 ) @U “4 1$ $% BQQ @0 &0 $ 9 ? g] $% 4P% &0 2R:' %N ( +U [1 YR] 2O. ) & 2R:' $ &0 2() 2O. 46 $ ,$. &"7 4V` .%0 4 @0 ,$. lU + &(4# 4c' $% "R] 2O. &0 M' ]0 % 4( $. (- @7 M4N) &1 $. y"! ,$. > 4†7 &'40 /.7 &0 ' x + Q/f 0 ,M% % >%47 84' [1 O0 $ f H$0 H 1,$ + @7 M4N) $-T > ) a1 , ?P' '+ $) Y" & I SAS ?40 H 1,$ K+U [1 ? $% J4 &0 (K+U .'+ &:9 ?' % & % T &0 >) > &L + % 2() 2O. @,7 $% $ 4V` ,$. 41 .%0 M']0 % 4( 2R:' Q/n Q/D J4 ^g Z) " + @7 M4N) „ U $. (- 4#$+) % $. O ?P' &:9 Y" & I M) 21% &0 „' @+ $. (K+U [1 O0 $ BQ H$0 H 1,$ YR] 2O. &0 2R:' M']0 % 4( % O &0 b04 , M% % (K+U [1 O0 $ Bf H$0 H 1,$ + @7 M4N) 1,$ YN 4 e. $% &7 % % >' &"N4 4, $% >) O0 $ Q H$0 H 1,$ + @7 M4N) 2, $. wW ) ,$. ?0 +U[1 ' 4#$+ .(B Y+) + ' $ % O wW [, 0 ' (K+U [1 M$ ., 2+ % % $% ~ $) <^1 $% $ % O &0 b04 - $-T $. $% 4V` $ 9 ? 1$ 4c' &0 M']0 2O. 2R:' ?40 ?40 (,+) ~ $. @7 M4N *.I Y.; K+' &v"0 M%R' 4#$+ 4V .(B Y+) 2+ % ,$. 41 0 &:9 $% $ YR] 2O. &0 > $% & #$U 2O. , &L 4T % 0 4#$+ ,$. $% 1,$ ? +†.1 ?0 ' &"( $% ' K+U[ 1 O0 $ „ U K O H$0 1,$ ? H$0 H 1,$ @7 M4N $. O „ U $. 9" $'7 @7 M4N 4V` (4X 2+ % % %N lU 2() M' ]0 % 4( ?4 [7 0 K+U [1 O0 $ BQ &L 4#$+ 1,$ > $% ' 2() 4 z4 %I $% $.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Effect of Different Host Plants of Normal Wheat Aphid (Sitobion Avenae) on the Feeding and Longevity of Green Lacewing (Chrysoperla Carnea)
    2011 International Conference on Asia Agriculture and Animal IPCBEE vol.13 (2011) © (2011)IACSIT Press, Singapoore Effect of different host plants of normal wheat aphid (Sitobion avenae) on the feeding and longevity of green lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea) Shahram Hesami 1, Sara Farahi 1 and Mehdi Gheibi 1 1 Department of Plant Protection, College of Agricultural Sciences, Shiraz branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran Abstract. The role of two different hosts of normal wheat aphid (Sitobion avenae) on feeding and longevity of larvae of green lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea), were conducted in laboratory conditions (50 ± 1 ˚C 70 ± 5 % RH and photoperiod of L16: D8). In this study wheat aphid had fed on wheat (main host) and oleander (compulsory host) for twenty days. For the experiments we used 3rd and 4th instars of aphids and 2nd instar larvae of green lacewing. The results were compared by each other and oleander aphid (Aphis nerii). Significant effects of host plant and aphid species on feeding rate and longevity of green lacewing were observed. The average feeding rate of 2nd instar larvae of C. carnea on wheat aphid fed on wheat, oleander aphid and wheat aphid fed on oleander were 40.3, 19.5, 30.6 aphids respectively. Also the longevity of 2nd instar larvae of green lacewing which fed on different aphids was recorded as 3.7, 7.8 and 6 days respectively. The results showed that biological characteristics of larvae of C. carnea are influenced by the quality of food which they fed on. Keywords: host plant effect, Biological control, Chrysoperla carnea, Sitobion avenae, Aphis nerri 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovering the True Chrysoperla Carnea (Insecta: Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) Using Song Analysis, Morphology, and Ecology
    SYSTEMATICS Discovering the True Chrysoperla carnea (Insecta: Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) Using Song Analysis, Morphology, and Ecology 1 2 3 4 CHARLES S. HENRY, STEPHEN J. BROOKS, PETER DUELLI, AND JAMES B. JOHNSON Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269Ð3043 Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 95(2): 172Ð191 (2002) ABSTRACT What was once considered a single Holarctic species of green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens), has recently been shown to be a complex of many cryptic, sibling species, the carnea species group, whose members are reproductively isolated by their substrate-borne vibrational songs. Because species in the complex are diagnosed by their song phenotypes and not by morphology, the current systematic status of the type species has become a problem. Here, we attempt to determine which song species corresponds to StephensÕ 1835 concept of C. carnea, originally based on a small series of specimens collected in or near London and currently housed in The Natural History Museum. With six European members of the complex from which to choose, we narrow the Þeld to just three that have been collected in England: C. lucasina (Lacroix), Cc2 Ôslow-motorboatÕ, and Cc4 ÔmotorboatÕ. Ecophysiology eliminates C. lucasina, because that species remains green during adult winter diapause, while Cc2 and Cc4 share with StephensÕ type a change to brownish or reddish color in winter. We then describe the songs, ecology, adult morphology, and larval morphology of Cc2 and Cc4, making statistical comparisons between the two species. Results strongly reinforce the conclusion that Cc2 and Cc4 deserve separate species status. In particular, adult morphology displays several subtle but useful differences between the species, including the shape of the basal dilation of the metatarsal claw and the genital ÔlipÕ and ÔchinÕ of the male abdomen, color and coarseness of the sternal setae at the tip of the abdomen and on the genital lip, and pigment distribution on the stipes of the maxilla.
    [Show full text]
  • Chrysoperla Carnea by Chemical Cues from Cole Crops
    Biological Control 29 (2004) 270–277 www.elsevier.com/locate/ybcon Mediation of host selection and oviposition behavior in the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella and its predator Chrysoperla carnea by chemical cues from cole crops G.V.P. Reddy,a,* E. Tabone,b and M.T. Smithc a Agricultural Experiment Station, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Guam, Mangilao, GU 96923, USA b INRA, Entomologie et Lutte Biologique, 37 Bd du Cap, Antibes F-06606, France c USDA, ARS, Beneficial Insect Introduction Research Unit, University of Delaware, 501 S. Chapel, St. Newark, DE 19713-3814, USA Received 28 January 2003; accepted 15 July 2003 Abstract Host plant-mediated orientation and oviposition by diamondback moth (DBM) Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Ypo- nomeutidae) and its predator Chrysoperla carnea Stephens (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) were studied in response to four different brassica host plants: cabbage, (Brassica oleracea L. subsp. capitata), cauliflower (B. oleracea L. subsp. botrytis), kohlrabi (B. oleracea L. subsp. gongylodes), and broccoli (B. oleracea L. subsp. italica). Results from laboratory wind tunnel studies indicated that orientation of female DBM and C. carnea females towards cabbage and cauliflower was significantly greater than towards either broccoli or kohlrabi plants. However, DBM and C. carnea males did not orient towards any of the host plants. In no-choice tests, oviposition by DBM did not differ significantly among the test plants, while C. carnea layed significantly more eggs on cabbage, cauliflower, and broccoli than on kohlrabi. However, in free-choice tests, oviposition by DBM was significantly greater on cabbage, followed by cauliflower, broccoli, and kohlrabi, while C.
    [Show full text]
  • Dispersal and Opposition Strategies in Chrysoperla Carnea
    Progress in World's Neuropterology. Gepp J-, if. Aspöck & EL Hòìzet ed, 265 pp^ 1984, Graz. Dispersal and Opposition Strategies in Chrysoperla carnea By Peter DUELLI (Berkeley and Basel) Summary The flight and oviposition behavior of the holarctic common green lacewing Chrysoperla car- nea (STEPHENS) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), has been investigated in alfalfa fields in the Califor- nia Central Valley and in laboratory experiments. In the first two nights after emergence the adult lacewings perform straight downwind disper: sal flights. Take-off behavior is elicited by the decrease in illumination at sunset. Since neither take- off nor the flight duration appear to be influenced by so-called "vegetative" stimuli such as food or mating partners, these pre-ovipository fligths are termed "obligatory migration flights". For the Central Valley an average initial flight distance of 40 km per night was estimated. In the third night after emergence the lacewings start to react anemochemotactically to food kairomons signalling the presence of honey dew. Males and females on their downwind flight are induced to land and approach the food source in a low, stepwise flight against the wind. Females mate in the third or fourth night after emergence and may deposit the first eggs on day 5. The consequence of the pre-ovipository migration flights is that very few females will deposit their eggs in the habitat in which they emerged. Consequently, virtually all eggs deposited in a particular field most probably stem from immigrant females. But even after mating and the onset of oviposition the dispersal activitiy continues. Reproductively active lacewings also take off every night after sunset and perform "appetitive downwind flights" until they enter the scent plume of a food source.
    [Show full text]
  • Ag. Ento. 3.1 Fundamentals of Entomology Credit Ours: (2+1=3) THEORY Part – I 1
    Ag. Ento. 3.1 Fundamentals of Entomology Ag. Ento. 3.1 Fundamentals of Entomology Credit ours: (2+1=3) THEORY Part – I 1. History of Entomology in India. 2. Factors for insect‘s abundance. Major points related to dominance of Insecta in Animal kingdom. 3. Classification of phylum Arthropoda up to classes. Relationship of class Insecta with other classes of Arthropoda. Harmful and useful insects. Part – II 4. Morphology: Structure and functions of insect cuticle, moulting and body segmentation. 5. Structure of Head, thorax and abdomen. 6. Structure and modifications of insect antennae 7. Structure and modifications of insect mouth parts 8. Structure and modifications of insect legs, wing venation, modifications and wing coupling apparatus. 9. Metamorphosis and diapause in insects. Types of larvae and pupae. Part – III 10. Structure of male and female genital organs 11. Structure and functions of digestive system 12. Excretory system 13. Circulatory system 14. Respiratory system 15. Nervous system, secretary (Endocrine) and Major sensory organs 16. Reproductive systems in insects. Types of reproduction in insects. MID TERM EXAMINATION Part – IV 17. Systematics: Taxonomy –importance, history and development and binomial nomenclature. 18. Definitions of Biotype, Sub-species, Species, Genus, Family and Order. Classification of class Insecta up to Orders. Major characteristics of orders. Basic groups of present day insects with special emphasis to orders and families of Agricultural importance like 19. Orthoptera: Acrididae, Tettigonidae, Gryllidae, Gryllotalpidae; 20. Dictyoptera: Mantidae, Blattidae; Odonata; Neuroptera: Chrysopidae; 21. Isoptera: Termitidae; Thysanoptera: Thripidae; 22. Hemiptera: Pentatomidae, Coreidae, Cimicidae, Pyrrhocoridae, Lygaeidae, Cicadellidae, Delphacidae, Aphididae, Coccidae, Lophophidae, Aleurodidae, Pseudococcidae; 23. Lepidoptera: Pieridae, Papiloinidae, Noctuidae, Sphingidae, Pyralidae, Gelechiidae, Arctiidae, Saturnidae, Bombycidae; 24.
    [Show full text]
  • From Chewing to Sucking Via Phylogeny—From Sucking to Chewing Via Ontogeny: Mouthparts of Neuroptera
    Chapter 11 From Chewing to Sucking via Phylogeny—From Sucking to Chewing via Ontogeny: Mouthparts of Neuroptera Dominique Zimmermann, Susanne Randolf, and Ulrike Aspöck Abstract The Neuroptera are highly heterogeneous endopterygote insects. While their relatives Megaloptera and Raphidioptera have biting mouthparts also in their larval stage, the larvae of Neuroptera are characterized by conspicuous sucking jaws that are used to imbibe fluids, mostly the haemolymph of prey. They comprise a mandibular and a maxillary part and can be curved or straight, long or short. In the pupal stages, a transformation from the larval sucking to adult biting and chewing mouthparts takes place. The development during metamorphosis indicates that the larval maxillary stylet contains the Anlagen of different parts of the adult maxilla and that the larval mandibular stylet is a lateral outgrowth of the mandible. The mouth- parts of extant adult Neuroptera are of the biting and chewing functional type, whereas from the Mesozoic era forms with siphonate mouthparts are also known. Various food sources are used in larvae and in particular in adult Neuroptera. Morphological adaptations of the mouthparts of adult Neuroptera to the feeding on honeydew, pollen and arthropods are described in several examples. New hypoth- eses on the diet of adult Nevrorthidae and Dilaridae are presented. 11.1 Introduction The order Neuroptera, comprising about 5820 species (Oswald and Machado 2018), constitutes together with its sister group, the order Megaloptera (about 370 species), and their joint sister group Raphidioptera (about 250 species) the superorder Neuropterida. Neuroptera, formerly called Planipennia, are distributed worldwide and comprise 16 families of extremely heterogeneous insects.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Lacewings May Fail to Suppress Aphids …
    yield losses were apparent. As has been Why lacewings may fail to suppress aphids. found in studies of several different cot- ton insect pests, plants that are setting bolls appear to have limited abilities to compensate for feeding damage. During Predators that eat other the late season, when bolls are opening and cotton lint is exposed, cotton aphids create problems by excreting large quan- predators disrupt cotton tities of sugary honeydew, which fall onto lint and create “sticky cotton.” Problems with sticky cotton become ap- aphid control parent during harvest, ginning and yarn manufacturing, and threaten overseas markets and the price premiums Califor- Jay A. Rosenheim D Lawrence R. Wilhoit nia cotton has historically received. Be- cause the cotton aphid is already resis- tant to many insecticides in California and an even larger array of pesticides in The predatory green lacewing, predators may attack other predators, the southern United States, long-term with potentially negative effects on pest Chrysoperla carnea, is often management of aphids will probably control. Here, we report a study de- need to rely on noninsecticidal alterna- abundant in mid- and late-season signed to determine the effectiveness of tives. cotton fields in the San Joaquin lacewing larvae, Chrysoperla carnea, as Cotton grown in the San Joaquin Val- Valley. However, neither these biological control agents of the cotton ley generally develops large populations aphid, Aphis gossypii, which feed on natural populations nor insecfary- of generalist predators, including big- mid- and late-season cotton in the San eyed bugs (Geocoris spp.), damsel bugs reared and mass-released lace- Joaquin Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Chrysoperla Carnea (Steph.) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) As a Potential Dispersive Agent of Noctuid Baculoviruses
    insects Article The Role of Chrysoperla carnea (Steph.) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) as a Potential Dispersive Agent of Noctuid Baculoviruses Oscar Giovanni Gutiérrez-Cárdenas 1 , Ángeles Adán 1, Inés Beperet 2 , Pilar Medina 1 , Primitivo Caballero 3 and Agustín Garzón 1,* 1 Unidad de Protección de Cultivos, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Puerta de Hierro, 2, 28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] or [email protected] (O.G.G.-C.); [email protected] (Á.A.); [email protected] (P.M.) 2 Research & Development Department, Bioinsectis SL. Pol. Ind. Mocholi Plaza Cein 5, Nave A14, 31110 Noain, Navarra, Spain; [email protected] 3 Institute for Multidisciplinary Research in Applied Biology, Universidad Pública de Navarra, 31006 Pamplona, Navarra, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 16 October 2020; Accepted: 3 November 2020; Published: 5 November 2020 Simple Summary: Baculoviruses (BV) infect several lepidopteran pests of economic importance, such as the beet armyworm Spodoptera exigua. The joint use of microbiological and macrobiological strategies may improve the efficacy of control. Laboratory bioassays were developed to evaluate the interactions between two BVs: the multiple nucleopolyhedroviruses of S. exigua (SeMNPV) and Autographa californica (AcMNPV), and the predator Chrysoperla carnea. The excretion products of the predator’s larvae (drops) and adults (meconia) were microscopically examined after the ingestion of BV-infected S. exigua larvae. For both types of excreta and BVs, viral occlusion bodies (OBs) (resistance forms) were observed. These OBs were infective to healthy S. exigua larvae when applied in water suspension and in direct deposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Chrysoperla Carnea) Digestive Physiology: Impact of a Cysteine Protease Inhibitor and a Synthetic Pyrethroid Evan A
    Characterisation of adult green lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea) digestive physiology: impact of a cysteine protease inhibitor and a synthetic pyrethroid Evan A. Mulligan, Nathalie Ferry, Lise Jouanin, Joerg Romeis, Angharad M.R. Gatehouse To cite this version: Evan A. Mulligan, Nathalie Ferry, Lise Jouanin, Joerg Romeis, Angharad M.R. Gatehouse. Char- acterisation of adult green lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea) digestive physiology: impact of a cysteine protease inhibitor and a synthetic pyrethroid. Pest Management Science, Wiley, 2010, 66 (3), pp.325- 336. 10.1002/ps.1879. hal-01203923 HAL Id: hal-01203923 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01203923 Submitted on 31 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Research Article Received: 21 April 2009 Revised: 17 August 2009 Accepted: 8 September 2009 Published online in Wiley Interscience: 18 November 2009 (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI 10.1002/ps.1879 Characterisation of adult green lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea) digestive physiology: impact of a cysteine protease inhibitor and a synthetic pyrethroid Evan A Mulligan,a Natalie Ferry,a Lise Jouanin,b Jorg¨ Romeisc and Angharad MR Gatehousea∗ Abstract BACKGROUND: In spite of concern regarding potential non-target effects of GM crops, few studies have compared GM pest control with conventional methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Lacewing Species in Tennessee in Tennessee, We Have Found the Green Lacewing Lacewing Larvae Look Like Tiny Alligators
    College of Agriculture Cooperative Extension ANR-E1-2020 Entomology Insect Predators-Green Lacewings Kaushalya Amarasekare, Assistant Professor, Tennessee State University Contact: 615 963 5001, [email protected] Natural enemies such as green lacewings Adults (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) are important for sus- Adult lacewings are green in color and have golden tainable agriculture because they provide us a free eyes. They have two pairs of green lacelike netted service in managing and controlling unwanted insect wings. The body of the adult is 1/2–3/4 inch long and mite (arthropod) pests in agricultural crops in depending on the species. They are not strong fliers fields and greenhouses. Green lacewings are preda- and are commonly found near aphid colonies. Adults tors of many soft-bodied insects (e.g. aphids, thrips, fly during night and are often attracted to night- mealybugs, soft scales, whiteflies, psyllids and small lights. They can live approximately 30-40 days. New- caterpillars) and mites (e.g. spider mites) and their ly emerged adults mate and lay eggs within 4–5 days. eggs. They are called generalist predators because It takes approximately one month to complete the they feed on many different types of insect and/or life cycle from newly laid eggs to emergence of mite prey. Green lacewings are considered as one of adults. the most important predatory natural enemies of agricultural pests. Eggs Adult females lay their eggs as small batches on plant materials. They prefer to lay eggs among aphid colonies. Lacewing larvae are cannibalistic and attack sibling eggs and larvae. To avoid the first hatched larva/larvae attacking unhatched eggs or young larvae, females lay each egg on a long stalk.
    [Show full text]
  • Chrysoperla Carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) Feeding on Rice Meal Moth, Corcyra Cephalonica Eggs
    Pakistan J. Agric. Res. Vol. 25 No. 3, 2012 EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON BIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS OF IMMATURE STAGES OF CHRYSOPERLA CARNEA (NEUROPTERA: CHRYSOPIDAE) FEEDING ON RICE MEAL MOTH, CORCYRA CEPHALONICA EGGS Javed Khan, Ehsan-ul-Haq, Naheed Akhtar, Waseem Ahmad Gillani*, Naila Assad**, M.Asif Masood and Irum Raza* ABSTRACT:- Developmental durations of immature stages of Chrysoperla carnea, feeding on Corcyra cephalonica eggs at three constant temperatures 24 ±1 ºC, 28 ±1 ºC and 32 ±1 °C were studied. The results indicated that incubation period was 4.9±0.08, 3.8±0.08 and 3.0±0.06 days at three temperatures, respectively. Developmental duration of first instar were 3.6±0.07, 3.0±0.11, 2.0±0.06 days, second instar were 3.4±0.11, 3.0±0.07, 2.8±0.07 and third instars were, 4.9±0.10, 4.0±0.06, 3.4±0.13 days at three temperatures, respectively. The larval developmental duration were 11.9±0.13, 9.7±0.31, 8.2±0.14 and pupal duration were 9.2±0.10, 8.3±0.10 and 6.8±0.07 days at three temperatures respectively. Biological cycle of immature stages were 26.0±0.13, 21.8 ±0.08 and 18.0±0.56 days, respectively with total survival rate from egg to adult emergence of 82%, 68% and 42% at the respective temperature. The results indicate that developmental cycle of immature stages were significantly different at three different temperatures and with increasing temperature the developmental cycle decrease significantly.
    [Show full text]
  • (Chrysoperla Carnea Stephens) Against Sucking Insect Pests of Okra
    Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 2017, 13, 47-51 47 Effect of Natural Enemy (Chrysoperla carnea Stephens) against Sucking Insect Pests of Okra Syed Shahzad Ali1,*, Syed Sohail Ahmed1, Huma Rizwana2, Ali Ahmed1, Abdul Ghaffar Khoso1, Paras Mureed1, Sumbel Mureed1, Falak Naz Meano3, Muhammad Ibrahim Mengal1 and Shahid Ali Shahwani1 1Department of Entomology, Faculty of Crop Protection; 2Department of Livestock Management, Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam, Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam; 3Department of Plant Protection, Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam, Pakistan Abstract: An experiment effect of natural enemy (Chrysoperla carnea Stephens.) against sucking insect pests of Okra was carried out at Latif Farm, Sindh Agriculture University, Tando Jam during 2014.The results showed that overall maximum mean population of jassids (1009.5 ± 78.12/plant) was recorded in pre-treatment treated plot followed by thrips (706.17 ± 34.26/plant), mites (572.5± 33.00/plant) and whiteflies (209.83 ± 19.76/plant) respectively. Whereas, the overall maximum mean population of jassids (1322.44 ± 8.6/plant6) was recorded in pre-treatment control plot, followed by thrips (828.05 ± 6.77/plant), mites (640.55 ± 5.95/plant) and whiteflies (267.38 ± 4.74/plant) respectively. However, the overall maximum mean of jassids (434.27 ± 4.91/plant) were recorded in post-treatment control plot, followed by thrips (278.11 ± 3.93/plant), mites (134.11 ± 2.63/plant) and whiteflies (18.83 ± 0.99/plant), respectively. The results further revealed that the statistical analysis of data through paired T-test between treated and control plot of jassids, whiteflies, thrips and mites showed significantly different at (P<0.05) level.
    [Show full text]