E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 106 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
Vol. 145 WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1999 No. 165 House of Representatives
The House met at noon.
REVISED NOTICEÐNOVEMBER 17, 1999 If the 106th Congress, 1st Session, adjourns sine die on or before November 18, 1999, a final issue of the Congressional Record for the 106th Congress, 1st Session, will be published on December 3, 1999, in order to permit Members to revise and extend their remarks. All material for insertion must be signed by the Member and delivered to the respective offices of the Official Reporters of Debates (Room HT±60 or S±123 of the Capitol), Monday through Friday, between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. through December 1. The final issue will be dated December 3, 1999, and will be delivered on Monday, December 6, 1999. If the 106th Congress does not adjourn until a later date in 1999, the final issue will be printed at a date to be an- nounced. None of the material printed in the final issue of the Congressional Record may contain subject matter, or relate to any event that occurred after the sine die date. Senators' statements should also be submitted electronically, either on a disk to accompany the signed statement, or by e-mail to the Official Reporters of Debates at ``Records@Reporters''. Members of the House of Representatives' statements may also be submitted electronically by e-mail or disk, to accom- pany the signed statement, and formatted according to the instructions for the Extensions of Remarks template at http:// clerkhouse.house.gov. The Official Reporters will transmit to GPO the template formatted electronic file only after receipt of, and authentication with, the hard copy, signed manuscript. Deliver statements (and template formatted disks, in lieu of e-mail) to the Official Reporters in Room HT±60. Members of Congress desiring to purchase reprints of material submitted for inclusion in the Congressional Record may do so by contacting the Congressional Printing Management Division, at the Government Printing Office, on 512±0224, be- tween the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. daily. By order of the Joint Committee on Printing. WILLIAM M. THOMAS, Chairman.
N O T I C E Effective January 1, 2000, the subscription price of the Congressional Record will be $357 per year, or $179 for 6 months. Individual issues may be purchased for $3.00 per copy. The cost for the microfiche edition will remain $141 per year; single copies will remain $1.50 per issue. This price increase is necessary based upon the cost of printing and distribu- tion. MICHAEL F. DiMARIO, Public Printer.
b This symbol represents the time of day during the House proceedings, e.g., b 1407 is 2:07 p.m. Matter set in this typeface indicates words inserted or appended, rather than spoken, by a Member of the House on the floor.
H12893
.
VerDate 29-OCT-99 02:01 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 8633 E:\CR\FM\A19NO7.000 pfrm02 PsN: H19PT1 H12894 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE November 19, 1999
The Reverend Dr. Ronald F. Chris- tleman from Illinois (Mr. HASTERT) is ness by paying down debt while giving tian, Chaplain, Lutheran Social Serv- recognized for 5 minutes. tax relief to American families. ices, Fairfax, VA, offered the following Mr. HASTERT. Mr. Speaker, as the We have made progress in all four prayer: first session of the 106th Congress con- areas. Our budget stopped the raid on Almighty God, we speak our words of cludes, I think it is proper to give this Social Security for the first time in 30 gratitude from hearts that sense Your legislative body my thoughts on what years. Why do we care so much about goodness. the House has accomplished this year protecting Social Security and the sur- You open Your hand and You satisfy and what is left to accomplish next plus? Let me give you three reasons. the desire of every living thing, and so year. Together we have enjoyed many First, it helps to strengthen the So- we raise our thankful song, for again victories and some disappointments. cial Security system far into the next the fall harvest has provided us with When I became Speaker last January, century. That means baby-boomers can granaries that are overflowing. the House needed some serious work. have the peace of mind that Social Se- The good Earth has produced bounti- The distrust and bitterness and ramp- curity will be there for them. ful fruits and seeds, and we are all ant partisanship of both parties threat- Second, when we protect the Social blessed because of it. ened to undermine the public support Security surplus, we also pay down the So this day we are a chorus of Your of this House. We had Members who Nation’s debt. Think about how good grateful recipients, and we sing as so would not even talk to each other, let you feel when you pay off your home many have sung through the years. alone work with one another. mortgage or your car loan. When we Now thank we all our God with heart Given that situation, last January in take responsibilities for our Nation’s and hands and voices. this very spot I said solutions to prob- debt, we ease the crippling burden of Amen. lems cannot be found in a pool of bit- our debt on our children and our grand- f terness. Solutions can be found in an children. Our budget discipline has al- environment in which we trust one an- lowed our government to make the THE JOURNAL other, and we trust one another’s word, largest debt reduction payment in the The SPEAKER. The Chair has exam- and where we generate heat and pas- history of this Nation. ined the Journal of the last day’s pro- sion, but where we recognize that each Third, when we protect the Social Se- ceedings and announces to the House Member is equally important to our curity surplus, we stop the govern- his approval thereof. overall mission of improving the life of ment’s spending spree. We have torn up Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Jour- America’s people. the government credit card and said nal stands approved. We have made progress in putting that now it is time for a new era of fis- f that bitterness behind us, because we cal responsibility. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE decided to go to work. Members of the Retirement security also includes minority cosponsored six out of the ten vital programs like Medicare, and I am The SPEAKER. Will the gentleman top bills introduced by the majority. pleased that we were able to take steps from Indiana (Mr. PEASE) come forward Our greatest achievements this year to restore vital funding for Medicare. and lead the House in the Pledge of Al- had bipartisan support: The budget bill The health care bureaucrats misinter- legiance. that we just passed, the Social Secu- preted the Balanced Budget Act guide- Mr. PEASE led the Pledge of Alle- rity lockbox bill, the appropriations lines and began slashing Medicare re- giance as follows: bills, the missile defense bill, the Edu- imbursements to nursing homes, hos- I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the cation Flexibility bill and the Finan- pitals, and other health care agencies. United States of America, and to the Repub- cial Services Modernization Act. Both We believe that Medicare must be lic for which it stands, one nation under God, parties must continue to promote their more efficient, yet still responsive to indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. views and their philosophies, but we the needs of our citizens. We passed re- f must never sacrifice the common good form that fulfilled those needs and re- MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE of the American people on the altar of stored funding to the nursing homes A message from the Senate by Mr. partisan competition. and hospitals. Lundregan, one of its clerks, an- We have proved that when we work Millions of seniors rely on Medicare nounced that the Senate had passed together, we get our work done. This every day. Our government must con- without amendment a concurrent reso- year, we passed the budget on time for tinue to improve and strengthen this lution of the House of the following only the second time since 1974. By lifeline for our seniors. We still have a title: completing our budget on time, we year left in this Congress, and I hope were able to complete all 13 appropria- that the President will work with us to H. Con. Res. 235. Concurrent resolution providing for a conditional sine die adjourn- tions bills without dipping into the So- find long-term solutions to the prob- ment of the first session of the One Hundred cial Security Trust Fund, doing that lems that affect the Medicare program. Sixth Congress. for the first time since 1967. For the As important as retirement security The message also announced that the second consecutive year we passed a is to older Americans, education is Senate had passed with an amendment balanced budget. That is the first time vital to the future of all Americans. As in which the concurrence of the House that has happened since 1960. a former public schoolteacher, improv- is requested, a joint resolution of the The appropriations process was hard ing education is one of my top prior- House of the following title: work and took longer than I wanted to ities. take, but, thanks to the dogged deter- America’s teachers and parents and H.J. Res. 82. Joint resolution making fur- ther continuing appropriations for the fiscal mination of the gentleman from Flor- grandparents have told us that they year 2000, and for other purposes. ida (Chairman YOUNG) and the ranking want the government to help improve f member, the gentleman from Wis- the Nation’s schools. We have re- consin (Mr. OBEY), and the rest of the sponded by putting education improve- SPECIAL ORDERS Committee on Appropriations, we com- ment at the top of our agenda, and I The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. pleted the work of the House; and, by am proud to say that we passed more PEASE). Under the Speaker’s an- doing so, we made great progress in education funding with less strings at- nounced policy of January 6, 1999, and preparing America for the next cen- tached, which ensures that more dol- under a previous order of the House, tury. lars will go directly to the classroom. the following Members will be recog- We had four goals at the beginning of Earlier this year the President signed nized for 5 minutes each. this Congress: Protect retirement secu- our legislation that would give more f rity for the next century, improve na- control over education to parents and tional security by bolstering our armed teachers and local administrators. Al- THOUGHTS ON THE FIRST SESSION services, reform our education system though Washington provides only 6 per- OF THE 106TH CONGRESS so that all of our children can go to a cent of the resources for our Nation’s The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a good school in a safe environment, and schools, it mandates over 60 percent of previous order of the House, the gen- promote economic security and fair- the red tape that our schools have to
VerDate 29-OCT-99 02:02 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\K19NO7.001 pfrm02 PsN: H19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H12895 deal with. The Federal Government a Tax Code that punishes widows Government does have an important should be providing a helping hand not through the death tax. role to play in the lives of the Amer- a heavier load for our Nation’s schools. The time has come to get some fair- ican people. It does have a responsi- We also passed legislation to improve ness to the Tax Code. Couples should be bility to secure the freedom and pro- teacher quality, improve student re- able to get married without the fear of mote the general welfare of its citi- sults, and give parents and teachers higher taxes, the government should be zens. more flexibility to teach our children. encouraging people to save for retire- But we must remember this: the Gov- Every child should have the oppor- ment, not punishing them, and our tax ernment works for the people; the peo- tunity to go to a school in a safe envi- relief package was responsible because ple should not be forced to work for the ronment, and we are committed to see- it took money out of Washington and Government. ing that those opportunities exist. put it back into the pockets of the peo- I want to thank my colleagues for Likewise, all Americans must be safe ple who earned it, the American people. the great trust that they have placed from international threats, and so our It would be irresponsible to leave the in me over the course of this session. It Republican majority will continue our whole $3 trillion surplus here in Wash- is a great honor and privilege to serve commitment to improving the national ington so that only politicians can as Speaker of the House. I look forward security. spend it. to an even more productive second ses- I am proud to say that we have suc- Our tax relief package kept faith sion. cessfully increased commitment to our with the balanced budget and it se- f men and women in uniform. We have cured $2.2 trillion for retirement secu- given them a well-deserved pay in- rity and for debt relief. As a matter of RECESS crease. We have increased defense fact, our budget spends down $350 bil- The Speaker. Pursuant to clause 12 of spending in other areas so that our lion of national debt this year. Al- rule I, the Chair declares the House in troops have the resources to get the job though the President vetoed this com- recess for 5 minutes. done. And why have we made this com- mon sense proposal, I hope he will Accordingly (at 12 o’clock and 20 mitment to our nation’s defense? It is work with us next year to provide tax minutes p.m.), the House stood in re- a dangerous world out there, and for relief to the American people. cess for 5 minutes. too many years the administration has We have come a long way since the f been slashing funding for our military, House first asked me to be the Speak- b 1225 while at the same time asking our er, but we still have much left to ac- troops to serve in more and more dan- complish next year, and we will con- AFTER RECESS gerous places around the world. sider a conservative agenda that makes The recess having expired, the House We currently have soldiers and sail- America a more compassionate place was called to order at 12 o’clock and 25 ors stationed in the Middle East, in to live. minutes p.m. Bosnia, in Kosovo, in East Timor and Earlier this month the President and f Korea, to name just a few places. Our I went to the South Side of Chicago to servicemen and servicewomen spend promote a plan that we hope will revi- CORRECTING ENROLLMENT OF months away from their families and talize America’s most impoverished H.R. 3194, CONSOLIDATED APPRO- are poorly compensated for doing so, urban and rural communities. It ac- PRIATIONS AND DISTRICT OF CO- and, as a result, many of them are complishes this goal through tax incen- LUMBIA APPROPRIATIONS ACT, leaving the military. In these good eco- tives, environmental cleanup, and 2000 nomic times, it is crucial that we in- other private sector and public sector Mr. PEASE. Mr. Speaker, I ask unan- crease our military budget to deter partnerships. Coupled with common imous consent that House Concurrent hostile or maverick countries and to sense education reform and better Resolution 239, directing the Clerk of improve the quality of life for military crime and drug control strategy, we the House of Representatives to make personnel and their families. can make these communities a safer a technical correction in the enroll- We also passed and the President place to grow up and to raise a family. ment of the bill H.R. 3194, which has signed a national missile defense bill This is compassionate conservatism. been introduced, be considered and that will make our homes and neigh- We will push for tax relief for the adopted. borhoods safer. Many hostile nations American family. It is compassionate The Clerk read the title of the con- are developing missile technology that to put more dollars into the family current resolution. will soon put the United States in budget. The SPEAKER. Is there objection to harm’s way. Fortunately, our missile We will consider health care legisla- the request of the gentleman from Indi- defense bill makes it a national pri- tion that will make HMOs more ac- ana? ority for the United States to develop a countable and health care insurance There was no objection. missile defense system capable of pro- more accessible. The text of House Concurrent Resolu- tecting us from the threat of enemy We will take up a trade bill for Africa tion 239 is as follows: missiles. and the Caribbean basin. We believe H. CON. RES. 239 As Americans, our liberty is our helping these countries help them- Resolved by the House of Representatives (the most valuable asset, and we must pro- selves is done more effectively with Senate concurring), That in the enrollment of tect ourselves from those who would trade, not necessarily foreign aid. the bill (H.R. 3194), making appropriations threaten it. National defense is among We will continue to find ways to im- for the government of the District of Colum- the most important roles of our Fed- prove retirement security for our Na- bia and other activities chargeable in whole eral Government. This is why this Con- tion’s seniors by addressing the long- or in part against revenues of said District gress will continue to support our mili- term problems that face our Social Se- for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, tary and give our troops the funding curity system, our Medicare system, and for other purposes, the Clerk of the and our pension system. And we will House of Representatives shall insert before they need to defend America and her the comma at the end of section 1000(a)(7) of interests. continue to do the work of the House. division B the following: ‘‘, except that sub- Finally, we remain committed to As we continue our agenda in the sec- section (c) of section 912 of H.R. 3427 shall be providing tax relief to the American ond session of the 106th Congress, we deemed to read as follows: people. This is why we sent a fair and will fight for certain principles. We ‘(c) ADVANCE CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICA- responsible tax relief package to the will fight to keep the Social Security TION.— President’s desk. surplus dedicated only to retirement ‘(1) FISCAL YEAR 1998.—Funds made avail- Currently we have a Tax Code that security, we will also continue to fight able pursuant to section 911(a)(1) may be ob- punishes couples for getting married for the principles of a smaller and ligated and expended beginning on or after December 15, 1999, provided that the appro- through the marriage tax penalty. We smarter government, and we will con- priate certification has been submitted to have a Tax Code that punishes people tinue to fight against government the appropriate congressional committees. for trying to save for retirement waste, unnecessary government power ‘(2) FISCAL YEARS 1999 AND 2000.—Funds made through the capital gains tax. We have and undue government influence. available pursuant to paragraph (2) or (3) of
VerDate 29-OCT-99 01:28 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\K19NO7.003 pfrm02 PsN: H19PT1 H12896 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE November 19, 1999 section 911(a) may be obligated and expended Are Blind Or Severely Disabled, transmitting By Mr. ACKERMAN (for himself, Mr. only if the appropriate certification has been the Committee’s final rule—Procurement KING, Mr. WEINER, Mr. FORBES, Mrs. submitted to the appropriate congressional List Additions—received November 18, 1999, MALONEY of New York, Mr. CROWLEY, committees 30 days prior to the payment of pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); to the Com- Mr. BENTSEN, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. the funds’ ’’. mittee on Government Reform. CAPUANO, and Mr. OSE): The concurrent resolution was agreed 5472. A letter from the Director, Office of H.R. 3511. A bill to prohibit deductions to. Procurement and Assistance Management, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 for Department of Energy, transmitting the payments to Holocaust survivors under cer- A motion to reconsider was laid on DOE’s 1999 list of government activities not tain settlements; to the Committee on Ways the table. inherently governmental in nature; to the and Means. f Committee on Government Reform. By Mrs. CHRISTENSEN: 5473. A letter from the President and Chief H.R. 3512. A bill to amend title 46, United ADJOURNMENT TO MONDAY, Executive Officer, Overseas Private Invest- States Code, to exempt from inspection cer- NOVEMBER 22, 1999 ment Corporation, transmitting a report on tain small passenger vessels that operate in Mr. PEASE. Mr. Speaker, I ask unan- the FY 1999 activities of the agency’s formal waters of the United States only in the Vir- management control review program, pursu- gin Islands; to the Committee on Transpor- imous consent that when the House ad- ant to 5 app.; to the Committee on Govern- tation and Infrastructure. journs today, it adjourn to meet at ment Reform. By Mr. TALENT (for himself and Mr. noon on Monday next. 5474. A letter from the Board Members, THUNE): The SPEAKER. Is there objection to Railroad Retirement Board, transmitting H.R. 3513. A bill to provide for grants to as- the request of the gentleman from Indi- the Board’s commercial activities inventory; sist value-added agricultural businesses; to ana? to the Committee on Government Reform. the Committee on Agriculture. There was no objection. 5475. A letter from the Inspector General, By Mr. GILMAN (for himself and Mr. Social Security Administration, transmit- GEJDENSON): f ting the Administration’s inventory of com- H. Con. Res. 239. Concurrent resolution di- mercial activities; to the Committee on Gov- recting the Clerk of the House of Representa- SPECIAL ORDERS GRANTED ernment Reform. tives to make a technical correction in the By unanimous consent, permission to 5476. A letter from the Director, Fish and enrollment of the bill H.R. 3194; to the Com- address the House, following the legis- Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior, mittee on House Administration. lative program and any special orders transmitting the Department’s final rule— heretofore entered, was granted to: Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and f Plants; Determination of Endangered Status The following Member (at his own re- for the Plant Lesquerella thamnophila (Za- quest) to revise and extend his remarks pata Bladderpod) (RIN: 1018–AE54) received ADDITIONAL SPONSORS and include extraneous material: November 15, 1999, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Under clause 7 of rule XII, sponsors Mr. HASTERT, for 5 minutes, today. 801(a)(1)(A); to the Committee on Resources. were added to public bills and resolu- f f tions as follows: ADJOURNMENT TIME LIMITATION OF REFERRED H.R. 230: Ms. PELOSI. BILL H.R. 939: Ms. MCKINNEY and Mr. WATT of Mr. PEASE. Mr. Speaker, I move North Carolina. that the House do now adjourn. Pursuant to clause 5 of rule X the fol- H.R. 1168: Mr. FOSSELLA, Mr. GILCHREST, The motion was agreed to; accord- lowing action was taken by the Speak- and Mr. MCINNIS. ingly (at 12 o’clock and 26 minutes er: H.R. 1275: Mr. LAZIO, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. CON- p.m.), under its previous order, the H.R. 1838. Referral to the Committee on YERS, Mr. SABO, Mr. WYNN, Ms. PELOSI, Mr. INSLEE, Mr. BILBRAY, Mr. BERMAN, and Mr. House adjourned until Monday, Novem- Armed Services extended for a period ending HALL of Ohio. ber 22, 1999, at noon. not later than November 22, 1999. H.R. 3081. Referral to the Committee on H.R. 1322: Mr. BILBRAY. f Education and the Workforce extended for a H.R. 1606: Mrs. MALONEY of New York. H.R. 2166: Ms. BERKLEY and Mr. DEFAZIO. EXECUTIVE COMMUNICATIONS, period ending not later than November 22, 1999. H.R. 2511: Mr. GOODLATTE. ETC. H.R. 2782: Mr. ROTHMAN f Under clause 8 of rule XII, executive H.R. 2893: Mr. UDALL of Colorado PUBLIC BILLS AND RESOLUTIONS H.R. 2966: Mr. DELAHUNT communications were taken from the H.R. 3293: Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Ms. Speaker’s table and referred as follows: Under clause 2 of rule XII, public SLAUGHTER, and Mrs. FOWLER. 5471. A letter from the Executive Director, bills and resolutions were introduced H.R. 3405: Mr. FRANKS of New Jersey. Committee For Purchase From People Who and severally referred, as follows: H. Res. 357: Mr. DAVIS of Florida.
VerDate 29-OCT-99 01:28 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A19NO7.001 pfrm02 PsN: H19PT1 E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 106 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
Vol. 145 WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1999 No. 165 Senate
The Senate met at 10 a.m. and was called to order by the President pro tempore [Mr. THURMOND].
REVISED NOTICEÐNOVEMBER 17, 1999 If the 106th Congress, 1st Session, adjourns sine die on or before November 18, 1999, a final issue of the Congressional Record for the 106th Congress, 1st Session, will be published on December 3, 1999, in order to permit Members to revise and extend their remarks. All material for insertion must be signed by the Member and delivered to the respective offices of the Official Reporters of Debates (Room HT±60 or S±123 of the Capitol), Monday through Friday, between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. through December 1. The final issue will be dated December 3, 1999, and will be delivered on Monday, December 6, 1999. If the 106th Congress does not adjourn until a later date in 1999, the final issue will be printed at a date to be an- nounced. None of the material printed in the final issue of the Congressional Record may contain subject matter, or relate to any event that occurred after the sine die date. Senators' statements should also be submitted electronically, either on a disk to accompany the signed statement, or by e-mail to the Official Reporters of Debates at ``Records@Reporters''. Members of the House of Representatives' statements may also be submitted electronically by e-mail or disk, to accom- pany the signed statement, and formatted according to the instructions for the Extensions of Remarks template at http:// clerkhouse.house.gov. The Official Reporters will transmit to GPO the template formatted electronic file only after receipt of, and authentication with, the hard copy, signed manuscript. Deliver statements (and template formatted disks, in lieu of e-mail) to the Official Reporters in Room HT±60. Members of Congress desiring to purchase reprints of material submitted for inclusion in the Congressional Record may do so by contacting the Congressional Printing Management Division, at the Government Printing Office, on 512±0224, be- tween the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. daily. By order of the Joint Committee on Printing. WILLIAM M. THOMAS, Chairman.
N O T I C E Effective January 1, 2000, the subscription price of the Congressional Record will be $357 per year, or $179 for 6 months. Individual issues may be purchased for $3.00 per copy. The cost for the microfiche edition will remain $141 per year; single copies will remain $1.50 per issue. This price increase is necessary based upon the cost of printing and distribu- tion. MICHAEL F. DiMARIO, Public Printer.
∑ This ‘‘bullet’’ symbol identifies statements or insertions which are not spoken by a Member of the Senate on the floor.
S14839
.
VerDate 29-OCT-99 01:33 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 8633 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.000 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 S14840 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 19, 1999
PRAYER The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The lenge in terms of our role in Kosovo. So The Chaplain, Dr. Lloyd John Senator from Nevada. we went from one extreme in the Con- Ogilvie, offered the following prayer: f stitution, involving an impeachment against the President, to the other ex- Dear God, it is with reverence and treme, where this Senate had to con- commitment that we address You as BANKRUPTCY REFORM template the possibility, the very real Sovereign of our lives and of our Na- Mr. REID. Mr. President, I hope in possibility, of war. That is how our ses- tion. You are absolute Lord of all, the the final hours of the session in the sion began, at such a high level with one to whom we are accountable and final day we will not forget the such great challenges. the only one we must please. Our fore- progress that has been made on the There were so many other challenges fathers and foremothers called You bankruptcy bill. I spoke to the man- that were presented to the Senate dur- Sovereign, with awe and wonder as ager of the bill, the subcommittee ing the course of the year. I am sad to they established this land and trusted chair, late yesterday evening, and he report that we addressed very few of You for guidance and courage. Our indicated that there was some thought them. Things that American families founders really believed that they de- by the Republican majority leadership really care about we did not spend rived their power through You and gov- they would accept the unanimous-con- enough time on, we did not bring to a erned with divinely delegated author- sent agreement that I suggested yes- conclusion. So, as we return to our ity. terday morning. As I indicated at that homes, States, and communities after In our secularized society, Lord, re- time, we have gone from some 320 this session is completed and we are call the Senators to their commitment amendments down to 14, 7 of which confronted by those who are concerned to Your sovereignty over all that is have either been accepted or they will about their daily lives and they ask us, said and done. May this day be a reaf- be resolved in some manner. We only What did you achieve during the course firmation that You are in control and have seven contested amendments. of this session? I am afraid there is that their central task is to seek and I hope we do not lose the initiative very little to which to point. to do Your will. Thank You that this is that has taken place to this point in This morning, I received some letters the desire of the Senators. So speak, the next few hours, or the next few from my home State of Illinois from Lord; they are listening. Guide, minutes, really, that we could enter senior citizens concerned about the strengthen, and encourage faithfulness into that unanimous-consent agree- cost of prescription drugs, as well they to You. In Your holy, all-powerful ment so that at such time as we return should be, because not only are these name. Amen. to the bankruptcy bill, we have a finite costs skyrocketing, but we find gross f number of amendments and can pro- disparities between the charges for pre- ceed to wrapping that up. I repeat that scription drugs in the United States PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE it is not the minority but, rather, the and the cost of the very same drugs The Honorable CHUCK HAGEL, a majority that is holding up this most made by the same companies if they Senator from the State of Nebraska, important bill. are sold in Canada or in Europe. led the Pledge of Allegiance as follows: Mr. HAGEL. Mr. President, I note the In fact, in the northern part of the I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the absence of a quorum. United States, it is not uncommon for United States of America, and to the Repub- The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The many senior citizens to get on a bus lic for which it stands, one nation under God, clerk will call the roll. and go over the border to Canada to indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. The legislative clerk proceeded to buy their prescription drugs at a deep f call the roll. discount from what they would pay in (Mr. HAGEL assumed the chair.) the United States. That is difficult for RECOGNITION OF THE ACTING Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, I ask seniors to understand; it is difficult for MAJORITY LEADER unanimous consent that the order for Senators to understand as to why that The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The the quorum call be rescinded. same prescription drug should be so cheap if purchased overseas and so ex- acting majority leader is recognized. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without pensive for American citizens in a Mr. HAGEL. I thank the Chair. objection, it is so ordered. country where those pharmaceutical f f companies reside and do business. The senior citizens have asked us, as SCHEDULE RESERVATION OF LEADER TIME well as their families who are con- Mr. HAGEL. Mr. President, on behalf The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under cerned about the costs they bear, to do of the leader, this morning the Senate the previous order, the leadership time something. Yet this session comes to will consider numerous legislative is reserved. an end and nothing has been done— items that have been cleared for ac- f nothing has been done—either to ad- tion. Following consideration of those dress the spiraling cost of prescription bills, the Senate will resume debate on MORNING BUSINESS drugs or to amend the Medicare pro- the final appropriations conference re- gram and to make prescription drugs port. Cloture was filed on the con- The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, there will now be a part of the benefits. ference report yesterday, and it is still Think about it: In the 1960s, under hoped that those Senators objecting to period for the transaction of morning business. President Lyndon Johnson when Medi- an agreement to change the time of the care was created, we did not include The Senator from Illinois. cloture vote to occur at a reasonable any provision for paying for prescrip- hour during today’s session will recon- f tion drugs. We considered it from a sider. However, if no agreement is Federal point of view as if prescription made, the cloture vote will occur at A CHALLENGING SESSION OF THE drugs were something similar to cos- 1:01 a.m., Saturday morning. Senators SENATE metic surgery, just an option that one may also expect a vote on final passage Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, the Sen- might need or might not need, but cer- to occur a few hours after the cloture ate, we hope today or perhaps tomor- tainly something that was not life- vote. In addition, the Senate could con- row, will be bringing this session to a threatening. sider the work incentives conference close. It has been a session which has Today, we know we were wrong. In report prior to adjournment. involved some historic decisions by the many instances, because of the wide Mr. President, I thank you. Senate. Of course, it began with an im- array of prescription drugs and the val- I suggest the absence of a quorum. peachment trial of the President of the uable things they can do for seniors, we Mr. REID addressed the Chair. United States, which ended in a bipar- find a lot of our senior citizens depend- Mr. HAGEL. Mr. President, I would tisan decision of the Senate not to con- ent on them to avoid hospitalizations ask the acting minority leader be rec- vict the President. Then, shortly there- and surgeries and to keep their lives at ognized. after, we faced a rather historic chal- the highest possible quality level.
VerDate 29-OCT-99 01:33 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G19NO6.001 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S14841 Last week, I went to East St. Louis, never having addressed campaign fi- last thing said; no conference com- IL, the town where I was born, and St. nance reform, something so basic to mittee, no bill, no relief, no protection Mary’s Hospital and visited a clinic. I the future of our democracy. for families across America. walked around and met groups of sen- On a Patients’ Bill of Rights, there is I will return to Illinois, and my col- ior citizens and asked them how much a term which a few years ago American leagues to their States, unable to point they were paying for prescription families might not have been able to to anything specific we have done to drugs. The first couple took the prize: define. I think they understand it now. help families deal with this vexing $1,000 a month came in from their So- It was an effort on the floor of the Sen- problem. cial Security; $750 a month went out ate to say that families across America The minimum wage debate is another for prescription drugs. Three-fourths of and individuals and businesses would one. Senator KENNEDY, who sits to my all the money they were bringing in get a fair shake from their health in- right, has been a leader in trying to from Social Security went right out surance companies; that life-and-death raise the minimum wage 50 cents a the window to the pharmacy. decisions would be made by doctors and year for the next 2 years to a level of There was another lady with about nurses and medical professionals, not $6.15. He has been trying to do this for $900 a month in Social Security; $400 a by clerks at insurance companies. It is years. He has been stopped for years. month paid in prescription drugs. that basic. Mr. President, you know as We are literally talking about millions Another one, about $900 a month in well as I, time and again, a good doctor of Americans, primarily women, who Social Security; $300 a month in pre- making a diagnosis, who wants to go go to work in minimum-wage jobs and scription drugs. forward with a procedure, first has to try to survive. Many of them are the The last person we met, though, told get on the phone and ask for permis- sole bread winners of their families. We another story. He was retired from a sion. will leave this session of the Congress— union job he worked at for many years, I can recall a time several years ago the Senate and the House will go a tough job, a manual labor job, and in a hospital in downstate Illinois home—and those men and women will he, too, had expensive prescription where I accompanied a doctor on get up and go to work on Monday drugs, but he was fortunate. The union rounds for a day. I invite my colleagues morning still facing $5.15 an hour. plan helped him to pay for them. Out of to do that. It is an eye-opener to see In a Congress which could come up pocket, he puts down $5 to $15 a month what the life of a doctor is like, but with $792 billion for tax breaks for the and is happy to do it. also to understand how it has been wealthiest people in America, we can- not find 50 cents for the hardest work- Think of the contrast between $750 a changed because health insurance com- ing men and women, who get up every month and $15 a month. One can under- panies now rule the roost when it single day and go to work, as people stand why people across America, sen- comes to making decisions about who watch our children in day-care iors who want to continue to lead ac- health care. tive and healthy lives, have turned to This poor doctor was trying to take centers, as those who care for our par- Congress and said: Please, learn from care of his patients and do the right ents and grandparents in nursing homes, as those people who make our the President’s lead in the State of the thing from a medical point of view, and beds when we stay in hotels, service Union Address that we should have a he spent most of his time while I was our tables when we go to restaurants. prescription drug benefit. with him on the phone with insurance They get up and go to work every sin- This Senate—this Congress—will go companies. He would be at the nurses’ gle day. This Senate did not go to work home without even addressing that station on a floor of St. John’s Hos- to help those people. We could find tax issue. That is sad. It is a reality facing pital in Springfield, IL, begging these breaks for wealthy people, but when it American families. You will recall, as insurance companies to allow him to came to helping those who are largely well as I, a few months ago we were all keep a patient in the hospital over a voiceless in this political process, we in shock over what happened at Col- weekend, a patient he was afraid might did nothing. We will return home and umbine High School with the killing of have some dangerous consequences if face the reality of that decision. those innocent students. This Senate she went home before her surgery—her If there is any positive thing that made an effort to keep guns out of the brain surgery—on Monday. Finally, the came of this session, it emerged in the hands of children and criminals with a insurance company just flat out said: last few days. Finally, after an impasse very modest bill that said if you were No, send her home. over the budget that went on for month going to buy a gun at a gun show, we He said: I cannot do that. In good after weary month, the Republican want to know your background. conscience, she has to stay in the hos- leadership sat down at the table with The bill passed. It was sent over to pital, and I will accept the con- the President. The President insisted the House of Representatives. The gun sequences. on priorities, and you have to say, by lobby got its hands on it, and that was That is what doctors face. Patients any measure, he prevailed. And thank the end of it. End of discussion. who go to these doctors expecting to goodness he did. As we return home to face parents get the straight answers about their Let me tell you some of the things who say, what have you done to make medical condition and medical care that are achieved in the budget we will America safer, to make communities, find they are involved in a game in- vote for. It has its shortcomings—and I neighborhoods, and schools safer, the volving health insurance companies will point out a few of them—but it has honest answer is nothing, nothing. and clerks with manuals and com- several highlights. Take a look at campaign finance re- puters who decide their fate. The President’s 100,000 COPS Pro- form. Senator FEINGOLD of Wisconsin is When we tried to debate that issue on gram across America has had a dra- on the floor. He has been a leader on the floor of the Senate, we lost. Amer- matic impact in reducing violent crime this issue with Senator MCCAIN of Ari- ican families lost. The winners were and making America a safer place to zona. They had a bipartisan effort to the insurance companies. They came live. There was opposition from Repub- clean up this mess of campaign funding here, a powerful special interest, and lican leadership to continue this pro- in America. Yet when it came to a they won the day. They had a majority gram. But, finally, the President pre- vote, we could muster 55 votes out of of 100 Members of the Senate on their vailed, and we will move forward to 100 favoring reform, which most people side, and American families lost. send more police and community po- would say: You have a majority; why Thank goodness that bill went to the licemen into our neighborhoods and didn’t you win? other side of the Rotunda. The House schools across America to make them Under Senate rules, it takes more of Representatives was a different safer. That is something achieved by than a majority. It takes 60 votes. We story. Sixty-eight Republicans broke the President, in negotiation with con- were five votes short. All of the Demo- from the insurance lobby and voted gressional leaders at the 11th hour and cratic Senators supported campaign fi- with the Democrats for the Patients’ the 59th minute. nance reform, and 10 stalwarts on the Bill of Rights so that families across In the area of education, the Presi- Republican side came forward. Yet America would have a chance. But dent has an initiative at the Federal when it was all said and done, nothing nothing came of it. That was the end of level which makes sense from a par- was done. We will end this session it. The debate in the House was the ent’s point of view. If we can keep the
VerDate 29-OCT-99 01:02 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G19NO6.004 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 S14842 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 19, 1999 class sizes in the first and second grade Let me tell you about Head Start. was the lowest priority of the Appro- smaller—rather than larger—teachers This is a good story. Head Start is a priations Committee. When we wait have a better chance to connect with a program created by President Lyndon that long, we invite controversy and child, to find out if this is a gifted child Johnson in the Great Society. There delay. Fortunately, it ended well. The who has a bright future, or a child who were people who were critics of the President prevailed. These educational needs some special help with a learning President’s initiatives, but Head Start programs will be well funded. disability, or perhaps a slow learner has survived because it is a great idea. Let me tell you of a bipartisan suc- who needs a little more tutorial assist- We take kids from lower income and cess story: The National Institutes of ance to get through the first and sec- disadvantaged families, and bring them Health. That is one of the best parts of ond grade. into a learning environment at a very the bill that we are going to vote on. It You know what happens when those early age, put them in something simi- receives a 15-percent increase over last kids do not get that attention? They lar to a classroom, and give them a year’s funding level. The National In- start feeling frustrated and falling be- chance to start learning. And we in- stitutes of Health conducts medical re- hind, and the next thing you know, it volve their parents. That is the critical search. Those of us who are in the Sen- is even a struggle to stay in school, let element in Head Start. ate, those serving in the House, are vis- alone enjoy the experience and learn This budget is going to provide $5.3 ited every single year by parents with from it. The President has said: Let’s billion—the amount requested by the children who suffer from autism, juve- take our Federal funds, limited as they President—to serve an additional 44,000 nile diabetes, by people representing are, and focus on an American initia- kids across America, and to stay on those who have Alzheimer’s disease, tive to make class sizes smaller in the track to serve 1 million children by the cancer, heart disease, AIDS. And all of first and second grade. year 2002. them come with a single, unified mes- I went to Wheaton, IL, and I saw a Class size reduction, which I have sage: Please, focus more resources, class like this. Believe me, it works. mentioned to you, is one that is very more money on research, more money Don’t take my word for it. Ask the ad- important to all of us. Disadvantaged on the National Institutes of Health. ministrators at the school, who applied students—there is $8.7 billion for title I We increase it this year some 15 per- for it, and the teachers who benefit compensatory education programs. cent. from it. And the parents are happy that That is an increase of $274 million, but Fortunately, one of the budget gim- it is there. it is still short of what the President micks which would have delayed giving The Republican side of the aisle re- requested. the money to the National Institutes of sisted the President’s initiative. But In special education there is good Health until the last 48 hours of the fis- thank goodness, in the closing minutes news. This budget will provide $6 bil- cal year was changed dramatically. Be- of the negotiations, the President pre- lion, $912 million—or 18 percent—more cause of that change, we do not believe vailed. Common sense prevailed. And than the fiscal year 1999 appropriations there will be any disadvantage to this we will continue this initiative to re- for special ed. In my home State of Illi- important agency. duce class size. nois, school districts will receive $227 I will give you an example of the life The way we are paying for some of million, a 62-percent increase since of a Senator and how this agency af- these things is very suspect; I will be 1997. fects it. A few weeks ago, a family in honest with you. We had this long de- Keep in mind these school districts, Peoria, IL, who had a little boy named bate during the course of the year because of a court decision and Federal Eric with a life-threatening genetic disease called Pompe’s disease, called about the future of the Social Security legislation, now bring disabled children my office. Their son’s only chance to trust fund. Some on the Republican and kids with real problems into a live was through a clinical trial; in side said: We will never touch it. Well, learning atmosphere to give them a other words, an experimental project historically we have touched it many chance. But it is very labor intensive at Duke University, which was being and very expensive. I am glad to see times. The money, the excess and sur- sponsored by a private company. plus in that fund that is not needed to that this budget will provide more Unfortunately, there were not any pay Social Security recipients has been money to those school districts to help additional slots available for Eric in borrowed by President Reagan, Presi- pay for those costs. this clinical trial. The company could dent Bush, and President Clinton, with Afterschool programs: We provide only manufacture enough of the drug the understanding it would be paid $453 million, an increase of $253 mil- for three patients. Eric would have back with interest. lion, to serve an additional 375,000 stu- been the fourth. Eric was denied admis- Now that we have gotten beyond the dents in afterschool programs. How im- sion to the trial for this rare disease. deficit era in America, when we talk portant are afterschool programs? Ask Sadly, Eric passed away. Pompe’s dis- about surplus, we hope we do not have your local police department. Ask the ease is rare. Children like Eric fre- to borrow from it in the future. So this families who leave their kids at the quently rely on the Government and year, to avoid directly borrowing from school door early in the morning, and its sponsored research for cures be- the fund, Republicans argued that they perhaps do not return home from work cause a cure for a rare disease is un- have done some things that are fiscally until 6 or 7 o’clock at night. They have likely to be very profitable for a lot of responsible. to be concerned about those kids, as the pharmaceutical companies. I am Let me give one illustration. This anyone would be. And the people in the glad to salute Senator SPECTER, Repub- budget agreement contains $38 billion local police department will tell you, lican of Pennsylvania; Senator HARKIN, for education programs. That is 7 per- after school lets out, we often run into my Democratic colleague from Iowa; cent, $2.4 billion, more than last year. problems. So afterschool programs give and my colleague from Illinois, Con- However, this increase is due to the kids something constructive to do after gressman JOHN PORTER, a Republican. fact that the agreement includes $6.2 school. I am glad the Federal Govern- They have made outstanding progress billion more in advance appropriations ment is taking some leadership in pro- in increasing the money available for than last year’s bill. viding this. the National Institutes of Health in What is an advance appropriation? In student aid, the agreement in- this bill. You borrow from next year. You do not creases maximum Pell grant awards to There is money also available for take your current revenue; you borrow college students by $175, from $3,125 to community health centers. We have from next year. So in order to provide $3,300. Since President Clinton has talked about a lot of things in this more for education, we borrow from taken office, we have seen the Pell Congress, but we don’t talk about the next year. grants increase by 43 percent. 42 million Americans—and that num- You might assume, then, we are This is an illustration of things that ber is growing—who have no health in- going to have this huge surplus of can be done when Congress works to- surance. Many of these Americans who money from which we continue to bor- gether. But we literally waited until are not poor enough to qualify for Med- row. It is anybody’s guess. We pass a the last minute to consider the edu- icaid and not fortunate enough to have bill, we appropriate the money, but we cation bill in the Senate. What is the a job with health insurance go to com- cannot account for its sources. highest priority for American families munity health centers, trying to get
VerDate 29-OCT-99 01:02 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G19NO6.006 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S14843 the basic health care which all of us ex- this type of outreach program for asth- national family planning programs. pect for our families in this great Na- ma can have dramatic positive results. The Republican leadership in the House tion. These community health centers There is one other thing I will men- of Representatives insisted, if we are serve so many of these people, and they tion. That is a program in which I be- going to pay our U.N. dues, it has to be deserve our support. With a 30-year came interested in 1992. I went to De- at the expense of international family track record of providing quality serv- troit, MI, and saw an effort that was planning programs. I think that is ex- ice to America’s most vulnerable, these underway to provide residential treat- tremely shortsighted. I hope the next community health centers need to have ment to addicted pregnant women. I Congress will have a little more vision our support. thought it was such a good program, I when it comes to family planning, According to congressional testi- asked the directors: Where do you get when it comes to enacting a treaty, for mony by the Health Resources Service your Federal funds? They said: We example, a nuclear test ban treaty. The Administration, which overseas health don’t qualify for Federal funds. I went Senator from Nebraska, who is now center programs, 45 percent of these back to Washington and put a dem- presiding over the Senate, is working health centers are at risk financially, 5 onstration project in place so that we with Senator LIEBERMAN from Con- to 7 percent close to bankruptcy, and 5 could take addicted mothers across necticut in an effort to revive that ef- to 10 percent in severe financial trou- America out of their drug-infested fort as well. ble. Between 60 and 70 health center de- neighborhoods, put them in a safe envi- I hope the next session of Congress livery sites already have been forced to ronment, and try to make certain that will be more productive in that area close their doors. Changes in the Med- the babies they would bear would be and many others. icaid program have cut the compensa- free from drug addiction. I yield the floor. tion for these centers. The Balanced It was a demonstration project, and The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Sen- Budget Act, which was good overall, it worked—1,500 children in 1994 in ator from Nevada. made some cuts that really have re- America were born drug free because of Mr. WELLSTONE. Mr. President, sulted in deprivation of funds. An addi- this program which we started in 1992. will the Senator from Nevada yield? tional $100 million to community We were about to lose it this year. Mr. REID. Of course. health centers would provide health Imagine, we know a drug-addicted baby Mr. WELLSTONE. I ask unanimous care to another 350,000 Americans. It is extremely expensive, let alone, per- consent I be allowed to follow the Sen- can open up 259 new clinics. This is haps, a waste of great potential in ator from Nevada. something we should do. human life. I was able to work with The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without Let me point to one thing I am par- Senators SPECTER and HARKIN to put $5 objection, it is so ordered. ticularly proud of in this bill. It is an million in the bill to expand our cur- Mr. REID. Mr. President, before my initiative on asthma. I was shocked to rent efforts. friend from Illinois leaves the floor, I learn of the prevalence of asthma in I say, in closing, there is one area of want to direct a few questions to him. America today. I was stunned when I this bill I find particularly troubling. I appreciate very much the outline of learned it is the No. 1 diagnosis of chil- In a world which now has 6 billion peo- this congressional session made by my dren who were admitted to emergency ple, in a world where we see the need friend from Illinois. The Senator from rooms across America. Asthma is the for family planning and population Illinois and I came to the Senate from No. 1 reason for school absenteeism in control to avoid serious poverty, to the House of Representatives. I feel a America. When I asked my staff to re- avoid environmental disaster, and to great affinity for my friend, not only search what we are doing to deal with avoid wars, the leadership in the House for the great work he does but because asthma, I found that we did precious of Representatives and the Senate has we came as part of the same class. I little. I started asking my colleagues turned a blind eye to international made a number of notations as he gave in the Senate about their concerns over family planning. I cannot understand his speech. asthma and was surprised to find so how this Republican Party—not all of Isn’t it about time we updated, re- many of them who either had asthma them but many of them—can be so in- vised, modernized Medicare? I say that themselves or had a member of their sensitive to the need for international because it was almost 40 years ago, cer- family with asthma. family planning. Every year it is a bat- tainly 35, 36 years ago, that Medicare They joined in trying to find a new tle. We have to understand that when passed. Almost 40 years ago, 4 decades approach, a new initiative that would population growth is out of control in ago, we didn’t have prescription drugs; deal with this problem. Leading that underdeveloped countries, it is a threat we didn’t have drug therapies that ex- effort was my colleague from the State to the stability not only of that coun- tended lives or made life more com- of Ohio, Senator MIKE DEWINE. He and try, of that region, but of the world and fortable for most people. I put in an amendment, which was the United States. I say to my friend from Illinois, isn’t funded in this bill, to provide $10 mil- We have to follow the lead of Presi- it about time Medicare became mod- lion in funding to the Centers for Dis- dent Clinton and many in Congress ern? Isn’t it about time senior citizens ease Control for childhood asthma pro- who have said U.S. involvement in have a program where they can get an grams. international family planning is abso- affordable prescription drug program What is asthma like? I have never lutely essential. We hear arguments to keep them alive, to keep them suffered from it, thank God. But imag- and see amendments offered because healthy? ine this illustration: For the next 15 there are some who want to make this Mr. DURBIN. I agree with the Sen- minutes, imagine breathing through a an abortion issue. The sad reality is ator from Nevada. Isn’t it ironic that if tiny straw the size of a coffee stir, that if a woman in a faraway land does you bought a hospitalization policy never getting enough air. Now imagine not have the wherewithal to plan the now, as an employee of a company, you suffering this three to six times a day. size of her family and has an unin- would expect some sort of prescription That is asthma. tended pregnancy, it increases the like- drug benefit as part of it, that goes There have been some innovative lihood of abortion. So family planning, along with most policies? things that have been done. In South- when properly used, will reduce the Medicare does not include that. Sen- ern California, Dr. Jones, with the Uni- likelihood of these unintended preg- iors find themselves at a distinct dis- versity of Southern California, has nancies. That is as night follows day, advantage. Many of the seniors I started a ‘‘breathmobile’’ moving for those who care to even take a look talked to the other day in East St. around the areas and neighborhoods of at this policy issue. Louis, IL, had heart problems. Back 35 highest incidence of asthma, identi- I am sorry to report that although we years ago, we didn’t have the wide fying kids with the problem, making are going to finally pay a major part of array of potential prescription drugs to sure they receive the right treatment our U.N. dues, which has been an em- deal with blood pressure problems, for and that their parents and teachers barrassment to many of us for so many example. Now we do. The fact that know what to do. That is what we have years while the Republican Congresses these prescription drugs are available to encourage. The $10 million Senator have refused to pay those dues, it was means longer and better lives for sen- DEWINE and I have put in this bill for at the price of threatening inter- iors.
VerDate 29-OCT-99 01:02 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G19NO6.009 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 S14844 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 19, 1999 Mr. REID. Also, while we are talking you read the Patients’ Bill of Rights, In one circumstance, the employer about prescription drugs, I offered an the Senator knows it is not a Patients’ collected the health insurance pre- amendment in the Senate, which Bill of Rights. miums from the employee and then passed, that said for Federal employ- It is unusual in this country—and the didn’t pay the health insurance com- ees—I tried to broaden it to cover all Senator and I are both lawyers, and I pany. So when the family tried to get insurance policies but was unable to do know sometimes the legal profession coverage for medical care, the next that—health insurance programs, the doesn’t have the greatest name, unless thing that occurred was they found out people who are allowed to get prescrip- you need a lawyer. But in our great so- the premiums had not been paid by the tion drugs should be allowed to get pre- ciety, this country that we admire— employer. That was the only example scriptions for contraceptives. The rea- and we salute the flag every day—it is we could find. But if the employer son is that there are 3.6 million unin- interesting that the only two groups of picks a health insurance company and tended pregnancies in the United people you can’t sue in America are they make a decision, we could not find States and almost 50 percent of those foreign diplomats and HMOs. a single case where the employer was wind up in abortion. Doesn’t the Senator think that held liable because of the health insur- So if people really care about cutting should be changed? ance company’s bad medical decision. back the number of abortions, we Mr. DURBIN. I agree completely with So that, I think, is a red herring, one should have prescription drugs avail- the Senator from Nevada. If we did that really does a disservice to Amer- able in the form of contraceptives for nothing else but change that to say ican families who deserve this right. people. But what the Senator didn’t these health insurance companies Mr. REID. The Senator also gave an mention is hidden in this huge bill is could be held liable in a court of law example of one of his constituents in language to lessen the effectiveness of before a jury of Americans for their de- Illinois whose child has Pompe’s dis- this program. For reasons unknown to cisions on health care, it would have a ease, who, as we speak, is not receiving anyone, other than a way to attempt to dramatic overnight impact on their de- treatment for that. help the insurance companies, they cisions also. They would think twice Mr. DURBIN. The child has passed have said there is going to be a con- about denying a doctor’s recommenda- away. science clause for pharmacists. I say to tion for a surgical procedure or a hos- Mr. REID. He wanted to participate my friend, I understand there should be pitalization. They would think twice in what is called a clinical trial. Is the a conscience clause for physicians who about delaying these decisions. Senator aware that HMOs almost uni- might prescribe these drugs, but does I have noticed, and I am sure the versally deny the ability of their en- the Senator see any reason why you Senator from Nevada has noticed as rollees to participate in clinical trials? should weaken this most important well, many times, poor families I rep- Mr. DURBIN. Yes. Frankly, during piece of legislation in law and have a resent in Illinois will get into a strug- the course of the debate here, the Sen- so-called conscience clause for phar- gle with an insurance company to try ator can remember that when they re- macists? to get help, for example, for a child ferred to reputable medical leaders in Mr. DURBIN. I do not. I agree with with a serious illness or disease, and the United States, such as Sloan Ket- the Senator from Nevada that it is ex- the struggle goes on for months; ulti- tering—which is a great institution tremely shortsighted. Perhaps we are mately, the family prevails; but during when it comes to cancer treatment and striking a moralistic pose when we say that period of time, the poor child is research and is respected around the we are not going to allow prescriptions suffering and the family is suffering. I world—they said, after their survey, for contraception. In other words, we think that giving those families across that clinical trials really open the door will acknowledge all of the other needs America the right to sue health insur- for new treatments and therapies that, a woman may have, but not provide for ance companies and saying to the frankly, save us money. They found birth control pills. That seems to me to health insurance companies that, like better and more efficient ways to keep be out of step with what American every other business in America, you people healthy. Meanwhile, the health families expect us to do. Let them will be held accountable for any wrong- insurance companies won’t pay for make the decision with their doctor. doing, is just simple justice. To do oth- them, and we are literally stopped in Instead, we are imposing on them what erwise is to suggest that we are going our tracks from moving forward with may be viewed by many as a moralistic to create some special, privileged class this kind of medical research and clin- point of view that should not be in our of companies and that, literally, the ical trials. province. This is the first I have heard health insurance companies are above In this case, with this little boy, of this conscience clause, where a phar- the law. That is not America. Eric, who passed away from this dis- macist, for example, might refuse to Mr. REID. My friend also knows that ease, he was closed out of a clinical fill a prescription for birth control with part of the public relations mech- trial. Would he have survived with it? I pills. Under this amendment that is anisms these giant HMOs have, they am not sure, but because of the health being put in the bill, he or she is not are going around saying, well, what insurance company, he never got a required to do so. these people in Washington want to chance. Mr. REID. It is in this bill on which do—the Congressmen—is allow suits Mr. REID. On the floor today, right we are going to vote. against your employer. Now, the Sen- next to the Senator, is the Senator Mr. DURBIN. I think it really ator knows that is fallacious. Any liti- from Minnesota, who has been a leader stretches credibility to think that a gation that would be directed against in Congress fighting for the rights of pharmacist, in this situation, would be the wrongful acts of the entity that those people who are disadvantaged be- allowed to make that decision and per- disallows the treatment has nothing to cause of mental disease. Well, there haps disadvantage a woman who may do with the employer. Does the Sen- was a big fanfare a week or two ago not have easy access to another phar- ator understand that? about some big health entity in the macy. Mr. DURBIN. That is right. The Sen- Midwest that had decided they were Mr. REID. The Senator has said it all ator probably saw the survey that going to let doctors make the decision, there. Not everybody lives in metro- there are people against giving families rather than checking them out. They politan Chicago, where they can go to the right to hold health insurance com- looked on their accounting and found two or three different pharmacies with- panies accountable in court, and they they could spend a lot of money trying in a matter of a few blocks. In some say, well, if you work for an employer to direct care. They said what they are places, there is only one pharmacy. who provides health insurance, those going to do now is let doctors make the I also say to my friend it seems un- families may turn around and sue the decision. What they didn’t tell us is usual—while we are talking about employer, as opposed to the health in- that this would not apply to people health care—and the Senator did an ex- surance company. So we looked at that who had mental disease, who had emo- cellent job in talking about the Pa- and did a survey; we investigated. We tional problems. Is the Senator aware tients’ Bill of Rights. We passed a pa- found out that only in a very rare situ- of that? tients’ non-bill of rights. We passed a ation has that occurred. Here is an ex- Mr. DURBIN. I am aware of it. I sa- bill here that is a bill in name only. If ample. lute the Senator from Minnesota, my
VerDate 29-OCT-99 01:02 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G19NO6.012 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S14845 friend, Senator PAUL WELLSTONE, and It strikes me that those of us who this morning on the floor of the Senate our colleague, Senator DOMENICI from sought this office to serve in the Sen- talking about providing health insur- New Mexico, for their leadership on ate or the House of Representatives did ance to the uninsured than we have this issue. It is a classic illustration of not do it just to collect a paycheck and spent in the entire session this year de- another problem facing American fami- accumulate years toward a pension but bating any proposals to deal with the lies which this Congress has refused to to do something to help families across problem. address. The problem is very straight- this country. This is the No. 1 concern I would say to my friends on the Re- forward. of families across the country. publican side of the aisle that if you An internist from Springfield, IL, If you have a child reaching the age have an idea, or a concept, or a piece of came to see me and said, ‘‘Senator, I of 23, and all of a sudden it dawns on legislation, come forward with it. Let am literally afraid to put in a patient’s you: Where is my daughter going to get us put our best proposal on the table. record that I am giving them medica- her health insurance? I can’t bring her That is what the Senate is supposed to tion for depression because the insur- under my policy. You start thinking. I be about. It is supposed to be a contest ance company will then label them as am sure the Senator from Nevada has. of ideas, and the hope that when it is ‘victims of chronic depression,’ a men- I have. As a parent, every day I call my all said and done, the American people tal illness, and discriminate against daughter in Chicago, who is an art stu- will prosper because we will come out them when it comes to future health dent, and an artist, and say, ‘‘Jennifer, with something that improves the insurance coverage.’’ are you insured this month?’’ ‘‘Yes, quality of their lives. This year we That is outrageous. Mental illness is dad.’’ But I have to ask the question have not. an illness, it is not a moral short- because health insurance is not auto- Mr. REID. I want the Senator, also, coming. These people can and deserve matic. to react to this. If we passed all of the to receive the very best care. Unless This Congress has done little, if any- programs the Republicans have talked and until the Senator from Minnesota thing, to help families across America about, the majority has talked about, and others of like mind prevail in the who struggle with this every single on rare occasions—medical savings ac- Senate and in the House of Representa- day—not to mention those with pre- counts, tax breaks for employers, and tives, we will continue to discriminate existing conditions. If you have a pre- insurance—does the Senator realize against the victims of mental illness. existing condition and it is a serious that would cover less than 5 million of That is something this Congress can do one, and you have to change insurers, the 45 million people? something about. We will leave here good luck. Most people find themselves Mr. DURBIN. The Senator from Ne- today or tomorrow, again, with that being discriminated against. vada is right. We overlook the num- unfinished item on the agenda. I agree with the Senator from Ne- bers. The numbers are important. It is Mr. REID. I also say to my friend vada. We have been here day in and day good to do something symbolic, but it that we were here last year wrapping out, and I have heard literally nothing doesn’t solve the problem. We know the up the congressional session. Is the suggested by the Republican leadership problem grows, as the Senator from Senator aware that since that time we to deal with this. Nevada has indicated, by 1 or 2 million have had 11⁄2 million new people in Mr. REID. At the beginning of our a year—more people without health in- America added to the uninsured rolls? August break, I traveled back to Ne- Mr. DURBIN. The list grows. The vada with my wife. As we flew home, surance coverage, more people who are Senator from Nevada knows as well as my wife became very sick. We got off vulnerable, and a Congress which has a I do that unless and until we face the the airplane and went immediately to tin ear when it comes to this issue. We look at the Time magazine polls reality that every American citizen the Sunrise Hospital emergency room. and every American family deserves As we walked in that room—she was where it talks about the concern of the the peace of mind of health insurance wheeled into the room—there were lots American people about health care. It coverage, you will continue to see em- of people. It was very crowded. We were doesn’t get through to the leadership ployers deciding not to offer health in- probably among the 10 percent of the in Congress, and we will leave this year surance protection, and working, lower fortunate ones in that room; we had in- having done nothing to make it better. income people in America will be with- surance to cover my wife’s illness. She Mr. REID. The Senator made an out- out the protection of either Medicaid was there for 18 days. Ninety percent of standing statement relating to guns, or health insurance at work. These the people there had no health insur- juvenile justice, kids getting killed, people get sick as other people do. ance of any kind. They were there be- and people getting killed. So that those When they present themselves to hos- cause they had no place else to go. people within the sound of our voice pitals, they receive charity treatment Those uninsured people get care. The understand what we are talking about, which is paid for by everyone, instead most expensive kind of care you can we are talking about people who pur- of receiving quality health care from get anyplace is in an emergency room. chase a gun shouldn’t be crazies or a the start. Preventive care can avoid se- Who pays for that? You and I pay for criminal. Isn’t that what we are say- rious illness. it. Everybody in America pays for it in ing? Again, it is an issue that this Con- the form of higher taxes for indigent Mr. DURBIN. It is very basic. That is gress has refused to address. care—higher insurance premiums, it. Mr. REID. I wanted to say this—the higher insurance policies, and higher Mr. REID. We are saying that we be- Senator has said it, but I want to un- hospital and doctor bills. We all pay for lieve the legislation we passed, with derline it and make it more graphic. it anyway. the Democrats voting for it and a few The Senator who is on the floor is the But we don’t have the direction from Republicans, basically said that under leader for the Democrats. I am the the majority here to have a debate on this law if you are mentally deranged, whip for the Democrats. We spend a lot what we are going to do with the rap- a criminal, or a felon, you shouldn’t be of time here on the floor. Have we idly rising number of people with no able to buy a gun. It should apply to missed something? Has the Senator health insurance. pawnshops, and it should apply to gun heard any debate dealing with the un- Next year, we are going to probably shows. Is that what the legislation we insured in this country? have 2 million more. It is going up passed said, and we can’t even get to Mr. DURBIN. No. We haven’t missed every year. We have 45 million people— conference on it? it, as the Senator from Nevada knows actually 44 million people now—who Mr. DURBIN. That is what it came very well. This is the third rail for a have no health insurance. Next year, it down to. Those who would argue that lot of politicians around here because will be close to 46 million people. Will gun control legislation and Capitol Hill you have to start to talk about things the Senator agree with me that it is want to take your gun away, that is that cost a lot of money. Doing noth- somewhat embarrassing for this great, not the case at all. What it is all about ing costs a lot more money. People get rich country, the only superpower in here is to say if you want to purchase ill, they have to go to the doctor, and the world, that 44 million people will a gun in America, whether it is from a to the hospital. When they need to have no health insurance? licensed dealer, a pawnshop, or a gun have serious treatment, or hospitaliza- Mr. DURBIN. It is an embarrassment, show, we want to know a little about tion, that is very expensive, too. and it is sad. We have spent more time you. Are you a stable person? Do you
VerDate 29-OCT-99 01:02 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G19NO6.014 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 S14846 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 19, 1999 have a criminal record? If the answer is When Senators FEINGOLD and MCCAIN approve of what is happening as we yes to either of those, if you are unsta- came forward with campaign finance sink to lower and lower depths in the ble, or you have a criminal record, then reform, 55 Senators—45 Democrats, 10 Democratic or Republican campaigns. we will deny you the right to own a Republicans—said we agree, at least I agree with the Senator from Ne- gun. Who can argue with that? A per- with respect to eliminating soft vada. If one can’t say something honest son who may in a weak moment do money. We should go forward with re- and complimentary about someone something to hurt an innocent person form. across the aisle without another person shouldn’t be given advantage or given The Senator from Nevada, though, looking for a political advantage, that an opportunity by the purchase of a points to another problem: Even elimi- is a sorry commentary on the state of firearm. nating soft money will not eliminate political affairs in America. We passed that when Vice President the expense of campaigns, until we find Mr. REID. I very much appreciate Gore came to the floor and cast a de- a way to put legitimate candidates on the Senator’s statement on education. ciding vote just a few weeks after Col- the television without the extreme The Senator talked about how impor- umbine. And that issue died over in the costs they run into now. tant it is to have additional teachers in U.S. House of Representatives when (Mr. BROWNBACK assumed the America to reduce class sizes. the gun lobby came through and said chair.) My daughter is a second grade teach- that is an outrageous suggestion—that Mr. REID. Let me say to my friend er. She said she can tell within the you would keep guns out of the hands from Illinois to show how the system first few days with these little kids of kids and criminals. has frayed, I was interviewed in Wash- who the smart ones are and those who I think American families see this a ington by a Reno TV station for a half are not so smart. The problem is class- lot differently. I am hoping that when hour interview. During the interview, es are so big, what can be done about Members of the Senate who voted with they said: How do you feel about the those in between, the average kid? the gun lobby go home, they will hear present Senate race? The person I had Most people are average. What happens the other side of the story. the good fortune of being able to beat to the average kids? Many times they Mr. REID. The Senator also men- is running again for the Senate; Sen- are lost in our present system. No matter how teachers struggle, tioned something we have not done— ator BRYAN is not running for reelec- campaign finance reform. I would like tion. I said nice things about my oppo- work long hours, and prepare their les- sons, they don’t have time to do it all the Senator to reflect a minute on how nent. I said I have known him; he is a because the classes are too big. What many people live in the State of Illi- nice man; I have known his family, and we have been able to do as a result of nois, approximately. they always supported me. I said nice the President hanging in there is get Mr. DURBIN. About 12 million. things about my opponent and I said more teachers to reduce class size. Mr. REID. In the State of Nevada, we nice things about the person who is have at least 2 million. But yet in a That is a positive step. going to be the Democratic nominee. One thing the Senator didn’t men- Senate race a little over a year ago in The Republican Senatorial Campaign tion, and I know we have spoken about the State of Nevada, Harry REID and Committee issues a press release they it, is the problem we are having in his opponent spent $20 million; that is, poured out to Nevada saying, ‘‘Reid en- America with high school dropouts. between the State party moneys, our dorses Ensign,’’ because I said some- Every day we have about 3,000 children own money, $20 million. That doesn’t thing nice about my former opponent. drop out of high school, half a million count independent expenditures by peo- They stooped to the level of saying, a year. We have no specific programs to ple who come from someplace and are Reid endorses John Ensign. address that. The Senator from New spending money. You don’t know who I like John Ensign; he is a nice man. Mexico and I have introduced legisla- The system has gotten so callous. they are, and where they are from—an- tion two successive years. Last year, it After this came out, a radio talk show other probably $3 million. So in a small passed; it was killed in the House when host called me and said, I am a Repub- State of Nevada, about $23 million. the Gingrich Congress killed it. It lican but I want you to know I think Does that sound a little excessive to would have set up within the Depart- the Senator from Illinois? what the Republican Senatorial Cam- ment of Education a dropout czar who Mr. DURBIN. It is more than a little paign Committee did is despicable. I would have been able to work on pro- excessive. It is outrageous. In Illinois, think it is, too. We now are suspect be- grams that have been successful in of course, we are faced with similar de- cause we say something nice about other parts of the country and, in ef- mands. If you want to buy television somebody who is running for office. fect, give challenge grants to local time, you have to raise money. If you Shouldn’t it all be nice? We should be school districts—they would still con- can’t write a personal check for it, you in a contest where we can determine trol the programs, of course—giving have to go out and beg for it. who will be the best for the State of them guidance and direction in keep- Members of the Senate and House of Nevada, the State of Illinois, the State ing kids in school. Representatives who spend their time of Minnesota—not the worst. This year on a strictly partisan vote on the telephone begging for money Mr. DURBIN. I agree with the Sen- the majority killed the Bingaman-Reid from individuals and special interest ator from Nevada. He came to Con- amendment. groups are not using their time to rep- gress, as I did, in 1983. There has been Would the Senator acknowledge the resent people in Congress. They are, a dramatic and palpable change in the fact we have to do something about frankly, unfortunately bringing an ele- atmosphere on Capitol Hill in that pe- high school dropouts, we need to do ment into this political process that is riod of time. I know he can remember something to keep kids in school? not positive. And the voters know this. in the early days when there was real Mr. DURBIN. The Senator from Ne- Interestingly enough, since 1960, we civility between the political parties vada knows that is the source of many have seen a dramatic increase in spend- and real dialogue and parties at night. problems. At juvenile justice facilities ing on Presidential election campaigns, We went to dinner together even if we across America, whether in the courts for example. And we have seen a dra- fought like cats and dogs on an issue or in the correctional system, we will matic decline in voter turnout and the on the floor. generally find the kids who are there number of people who participate. Vot- That has changed. The well has been dropped out of high school. Having ers have decided to vote with their feet poisoned by the obsession with nega- dropped out, with time on their hands and stay home. They are sick of the tive politics. I think that is one of the and no skills to get a job, many of negative advertising. They are sick of reasons the American people are them veered toward drugs and crime the special interest groups. They are checking out. They said if that is the and a life that is not productive. sick of the fundraising involved in this. best that can be done, you profes- We end up paying for that over and And they are sick of the process. In a sionals in the business, we would just over and over and over again. The old democracy, you can’t stand that very as soon stay home and watch profes- saying about an ounce of prevention is long because if democracy is going to sional wrestling. Occasionally profes- true. The Senator from Nevada has work, people have to be involved in it. sional wrestlers are involved in poli- been a leader on this, telling the Na- And that means cleaning up our acts. tics. The point they make is they don’t tion we have to look at high school
VerDate 29-OCT-99 01:02 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G19NO6.016 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S14847 dropouts not just as a sad reality but budget; let’s exclude the Social Secu- crats on Capitol Hill, had a very posi- as a challenge to all to do better. rity trust fund from the balancing. tive impact on America and its future. I look at some of the things I have The Senator is aware they defeated We have gone through one of the long- learned recently about the American that because they wanted to have their est and strongest economic growth pe- workforce. When I visited Dell Com- calculations applying the vast surplus riods in our history. I think it relates puter in Austin, TX, last week and that we have had the last several years back directly to that 1993 vote. talked to their officers and leaders in with our Social Security fund, they I can recall a number of my col- their company, they said they hired wanted to apply that to balance the leagues—Congresswoman Mezvinsky, a some 6,000 people in the previous 3 budget. new Congresswoman from Pennsyl- months to work for Dell Computer in Is the Senator aware of that? vania who only served one term be- Austin and Nashville, TN. I find their Mr. DURBIN. I remember that de- cause she had the courage to cast that complaint or request similar to those I bate. Frankly, I think that was really vote. If she had not, America might have heard in Illinois. We can’t find the critical debate, when it came to the have gone on a different course than we enough skilled workers. That says to future of that amendment and when have seen recently. me that our educational system has to the Republican majority rejected our Mr. REID. I apologize to my friend be better, it can’t let any child fall be- attempts to protect the Social Secu- from Minnesota. I want to end by ask- hind and be forgotten. We have to ad- rity trust fund in the balanced budget ing one final group of questions to the dress dropouts. We have to address amendment debate. That was the end Senator from Illinois. skilled training. We have to address of the debate. As I recall, that amend- We are here in kind of a celebratory the kind of educational reform that ment lost by one or two votes at the fashion. We are going to complete this goes way beyond the question about most. I voted against it. I think the bill tonight, unless certain Members of who wears a uniform to school and who Senator from Nevada did as well. If it the Senate keep our staff in all night doesn’t. But we haven’t done it in this was not going to protect Social Secu- long. Otherwise, we will finish it very rity, then we should not go forward Congress. quickly. I am glad the Senator from Nevada with it. Does the Senator understand getting As I reflect on it, it is a little over 21⁄2 has been a leader on this issue of drop- to this point has been really difficult years ago that the battle cry on Cap- out. and we, the minority, have had to hang itol Hill was: The deficits, the balanced Mr. REID. If for no other statistics, very tough? budget amendment, let the courts step we should look at the penitentiaries Remember, in an effort to get where in and have Congress stop spending; and jails in America. Eighty-three per- we are, there have been a number of that was our only hope. Now we are in cent of the people sentenced for crimes ways the majority has attempted to the era of surpluses. We have changed in America today are high school drop- get to this point. You remember the so dramatically without that constitu- outs, 83 percent. That says it all as far Wall Street Journal article where they tional amendment. as I am concerned as to why we need to The Senator from Nevada recalls ac- talked about the two sets of books the do something about dropouts. curately the Social Security trust fund Republicans were keeping? They would, Mr. WELLSTONE. Will the Senator was a viable issue at that point. for certain things, go with the Office of yield? Mr. REID. The Senator was also part Management and Budget and for cer- Mr. REID. I am happy to yield to the of this Congress when, in 1993, without tain things go with the Congressional Senator. a single Republican vote, we passed the Budget Office. Does the Senator re- Mr. WELLSTONE. Mr. President, budget to address the deficit. It passed. member that? Judge Rick Solum from Minnesota told We had to have the Vice President Mr. DURBIN. Yes. me—and I have to have this confirmed; come down and break the tie. The Sen- Mr. REID. You can’t keep two sets of it is dramatically jarring—there is ac- ator recalls at that time clearly, we books. The Senator recalls that didn’t tually a higher correlation between had deficits of about $300 billion a year. work. Does the Senator remember high school dropout and incarceration Since then, we now have surpluses. We that? than between cigarette smoking and have done very well with low inflation, Mr. DURBIN. Yes, I do. lung cancer. It is quite predictable. low unemployment—40-year employ- Mr. REID. Does the Senator also re- The Senator from Nevada was talk- ment highs in that regard. We have member they came up with this inge- ing about his daughter’s experience as created about 20 million new jobs. We nious idea that they would add a a second grade teacher. In many ways have about 350,000 fewer Federal em- month to the calendar? Does the Sen- we harp on the complexity of it all to ployees than we had then. We have a ator remember that? the point it becomes the ultimate cop- Federal Government about the same Mr. DURBIN. That is right, 13 out, but a lot of these kids by kinder- size as when President Kennedy was months. garten are way behind. There is a President. Mr. REID. I remember the Senator learning gap and they fall further be- We could go on with other things from Illinois saying that is a great idea hind and then they drop out of school that happened as a result of the hard because we can just keep adding and wind up all too often in prison. vote we cast, without a single vote months to the year and we will never It does seem to me this is a full agen- from the Republicans. Does the Sen- have a Y2K problem. da that we barely touched. ator remember that? Mr. DURBIN. That is right. Sorry to interrupt. I am enjoying lis- Mr. DURBIN. I was in the House of Mr. REID. That was something also tening to the discussion. Representatives and cast a vote in where we said: That is not fair, we are Mr. REID. I appreciate hearing from favor of the President’s program. I can not going to do it. That didn’t work. the professor. tell you, literally, there were Demo- Does the Senator also recall when I want to talk with my friend from cratic Members of the House of Rep- they decided, with the earned-income Illinois about Social Security. The resentatives who lost in the next elec- tax credit, the program that President Senator mentioned Social Security. tion, in 1994, because of that vote they Reagan said was the best welfare pro- One of the things that puts a smile on cast. It was a really courageous effort gram in the history of the country, my face is when I hear the majority on their part. It was exploited by those where you would give the working poor talking about having saved Social Se- who said they were going to somehow tax incentives to keep working—does curity. If that doesn’t put a smile on destroy the economy and raise taxes the Senator recall they wanted to your face, nothing would because the across America. Yet look at what has withhold parts of those moneys to the Senator will recall a few years ago here happened. From 1993 to the current poor in an effort to balance the budget? in the Congress we were debating some- day, we have seen the Dow Jones index Mr. DURBIN. I remember there was a thing called the constitutional amend- go from 3,500 to over 11,000, and all the certain Governor from Texas who ad- ment to balance the budget. As the things the Senator from Nevada has al- monished the Republican Members in Senator will recall, I offered the first luded to. the House and Senate, the House in amendment to say, fine, we want a con- So that decision by President Clin- particular, for their insensitivity. He stitutional amendment to balance the ton, supported exclusively by Demo- said you should not balance the budget
VerDate 29-OCT-99 01:02 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G19NO6.019 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 S14848 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 19, 1999 on the backs of working people, and THE LACK OF SENATE school for kids in the Indian commu- that was about the time they aban- ACCOMPLISHMENTS nity. doned that particular gimmick. Mr. WELLSTONE. Mr. President, I It is interesting, just this past week Mr. REID. Then there was the across- say to my colleagues, there are other I was there, and at the end of the dis- the-board cut. Does the Senator under- colleagues on the floor. I have waited cussion I said to the students: I have to stand when they were doing that, and for some time. I think it has been an leave in 30 seconds, and I am sorry we it was decided to do all these things, important discussion, but I am going are finishing. Can any of you talk they did it without the offsets that to try, since there are other Senators about one thing you care more about would take an across-the-board cut of 7 on the floor, to abbreviate my remarks. than anything else? or 8 percent, but now they are declar- I actually could speak for 3 or 4 or 5 This one student who is age 15 said: ing a victory because they got an hours right now. I will not. We will see The thing I think the most about is I across-the-board cut—except the Presi- when we are going to finish up today. would like for the children—I viewed dent can decide what is going to be I would like to build on a little bit of him as a child at age 15—I would like cut—of .37 percent? Does the Senator the discussion I just heard, and then I the children to live a better life than from Illinois understand that crying would like to go to the issue at hand, we have been able to live, and I would victory over having a .3-percent across- which is the extension of the Northeast like to live a life that will help kids do the-board cut where the President can Dairy Compact, the way this was done, better. decide what would be cut is not some- the impact on my State of Minnesota, I said to this student: That was the thing they should be crowing about and why we have been fighting this most beautiful, powerful thing I heard victoriously? out. said in any school I have visited, and I First of all, I also thank Senator have been in a school every 2 weeks for Mr. DURBIN. It is a face-saving ges- DURBIN for his very strong voice on the the last 9, 91⁄2 years I have been in the ture on their part. Once we got into the floor of the Senate. I say to Senator Senate. budget negotiations and the Repub- REID from Nevada, sometimes we come I tend to come down more on the side lican leadership was faced with actu- out here and compliment each other to of the editorial debate of the Wash- ally saying, no, we won’t add addi- the point it becomes so flowery, people ington Post. I do not think this Con- tional teachers, we will not have addi- are not sure whether it is sincere or gress has much to be proud of at all. tional cops on the beat to address the not. I believe it is sincere. Senator Part of what has happened is we have crime problem across America, they REID is a good example of somebody in been engaged in a lot of mutual self-de- could not do it. They ended up saying politics who, if he suffers from any- ception. I came out to the floor quite a we actually won because we got this thing, it is modesty. He rarely takes while ago on an amendment dealing so-called across-the-board cut of .37 credit. He really has done some tre- with veterans’ health care. I said it was percent. mendous work in the mental health a deliberate effort to bust the budget I might say to the Senator from Ne- field. He has probably done more than caps. vada, as he well knows, this is entirely anybody in the Senate to get us to The ways in which we have been within the discretion of the President, focus on the problem of depression. He talking about ‘‘not raiding the Social so it is not across the board. He can de- never takes the credit. He should have Security surplus’’ has been ridiculous. cide which areas of Federal spending to included himself in this discussion. President Clinton started to do it. Tom reduce to reach this target. I am talking about Senator REID. DeLay has done it. We have put our- Mr. REID. I have enjoyed very much Mr. President, I am not sure how ex- selves in a straitjacket. We know that visiting with my friend from Illinois. actly to view this overall omnibus con- is not what it is about, but it is great As the session is drawing to a close, I ference report we now have before us. I political sloganeering. want to express appreciation, on behalf am a little worried about sounding so For Republicans who do not believe, of all the Democratic Senators, for the negative that it will seem I only come when it comes to the most critical Senator being our floor leader. He has to the floor to be negative. I do not. I issues of people’s lives, there is nothing done an outstanding job. He has been think some of what my colleagues have the Government can or should do, then here. He has been able to express him- talked about—given the framework we I think you are consistent and I respect self very well, as we all know he can. I were working within and given where your point of view, for those Repub- want to personally tell him how much we started, I think there are some licans who take that position, and this I appreciate it. And on behalf of the things people can feel good about. is not a problem. But for Democrats Democratic Senators, for all of them, I I am pleased to give the administra- and other Republicans who believe tell the Senator how much we appre- tion and Democrats some credit for at there are certain decisive areas of life ciate every word he has spoken, every- least being able to get some resources in America, such as investment in chil- thing he has done, and I will make sure for some areas of priorities, such as dren and education and opportunities the majority keeps their ear to what more teachers and schools and moving for children, decent health care cov- the Senator from Illinois is saying. He toward smaller class size. It was a fix. erage, environmental protection, mak- has done extremely well in expressing I know for the State of Minnesota, and ing sure we have some support for the what I believe are the views of the ma- I am sure for many States, the Bal- most vulnerable citizens in the Con- jority of the American people. anced Budget Act of 1997 and the cuts gress, whether it be congregate dining Mr. DURBIN. I thank the Senator. It in Medicare reimbursement had, no or Meals on Wheels or affordable child could not have been done without Sen- pun intended, catastrophic con- care or, for God’s sake, making sure ator DASCHLE and Senator REID and the sequences, especially for our rural hos- children are not hungry in America, I leadership of my colleagues who have pitals, some of the nursing homes, do not think we have much to be proud joined me. I also say it could not have home-based health care, and teaching of because we have done precious little. been done without having such good, hospitals. At least we were able to As a matter of fact, I say to my col- strong issues the American people sup- make a difference for a couple of years, leagues on our side of the aisle, if you port, that we can come talk about on though, again, it is temporary. were to take the ‘‘non-Social Security the floor each day, pointing out that in I feel pretty good about some invest- surplus,’’ 75 percent of it because of this session of Congress they have not ment of resources that are going to be cuts in the budget caps of 2 years ago been addressed. helpful to people in Minnesota. If I had in a lot of these areas we say we care to pick out one priority, it would be $14 the most about, in real dollar terms we I thank the Senator for his kind million for the Fon du Lac School, a are still not spending as much as we words. pretty important commitment of re- spent several years ago. Mr. WELLSTONE addressed the sources. I count as one of the best days I do not think we have all that much Chair. as a Senator the day I visited Fon du to be proud of and we have to do a lot The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under Lac School. It is a pretty horrendous better. I said at the beginning I would the previous order, the Senator from facility, and for years I have been try- talk about some positive things. I do Minnesota is recognized. ing to get some money to build a new not want to come out here appearing to
VerDate 29-OCT-99 03:39 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G19NO6.022 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S14849 be shrill. I do think, unfortunately, critically important, and we invest children and jobs at decent wages are this is a pretty rigorous analysis. hardly anything in affordable child important issues to them—that is their We did not pass campaign finance re- care. center; that is the center of their form. That is the core issue. That is Third, we do not do anything about lives—and they believe the Republican the core issue, the core problem. We the concerns and circumstances of chil- majority has not been willing to move did not pass patient protection legisla- dren’s lives in New York City or Min- on this agenda, and they feel as if there tion. We have done precious little to neapolis-St. Paul or rural Aitkin Coun- is a big disconnect between what is deal with the reality of 44 million peo- ty or rural anywhere or inner-suburban done here and the lives of people who ple without any health insurance cov- anywhere in the country before they go we are suppose to represent, then I say, erage and many other people having to school and when they go home, let the next election be a referendum. health insurance coverage but being whether it be the violence in the But I certainly wish we had done more. underinsured. homes, or the children who see the vio- f Under title I—I saw this listed as one lence or the violence in the commu- of our victories—we are funding about nities or children who come to school A FAIR DEAL FOR MINNESOTA one-third of the kids who are eligible hungry or children who come to school DAIRY FARMERS to be helped. These are some of our with an abscess because they do not Mr. WELLSTONE. Mr. President, most vulnerable children in America, have dental care. It is not very easy for final point. Some of us have been fight- to the point where in Minnesota, in St. children to do well in school under ing for several days. We are out of le- Paul, after you reach the threshold of a these conditions. We do not do hardly verage now. It is toward the end. But school that has 65 percent low-income anything to change any of those condi- to be real clear about it, there was a population, there is no money for any tions for children’s lives in America so time, when the Northeast Dairy Com- other schools. It is about a $16 billion that we can truly live up to the idea of pact was brought to the floor, it was shortfall, and we have increased spend- equal opportunity for every child. going to be part of the 1996 ‘‘Freedom ing by $75 million. But we are going to flunk them. We to Farm.’’ I think it is the ‘‘Freedom We have done hardly anything for af- are going to fail them. We are going to to Fail’’ bill. It was defeated. fordable child care. We did not include give them standardized tests and fail But this compact, which was not in prescription drug coverage as a part of them. We already know which kids are the farm bill that passed in either Medicare. On a whole host of amend- going to do well and which kids are House, was then put into the con- ments I have worked on as a Senator, not. I would argue it is cowardly. I ference committee. There is a reform almost all of them were eliminated in would argue it is a great political slo- issue on which we ought to work. There conference committee; whether it be at gan, but it is cowardly. There is a dif- is one in which I am really interested. least some support for kids who wit- ference between testing and standard- I do not think the conference com- ness violence in their homes or trying ized—we should have accountability, mittee, which has become the ‘‘third to deal with the problem of exploi- but there are different ways of testing. House’’ of the Congress, should be able If you cannot prove you are giving tation of women in international sex to put an amendment, a provision, into every child the same opportunity to trafficking or juvenile justice mental conference that was not passed in ei- achieve and do well in the test, what health services or having an honest ther House; or, for that matter, take are you doing giving these kids these policy evaluation of what the welfare out a provision that was passed in both standardized tests and flunking them ‘‘reform’’ is doing around the country Houses. and not letting them go on to the next or increasing some funding—I mean So this got snuck in. It was part of a grade? deal. It is how we got the ‘‘Freedom to real funding, a real increase of fund- We have done so little when it comes Fail’’ bill, which has visited unbeliev- ing—for Meals on Wheels or congregate to good health care for every citizen, dining or social services support. equal opportunity for every child, jobs able economic pain and misery. The argument that was made for the If you look at it from the point of at decent wages, and getting money Freedom to Farm bill was it should all view of how at least I think we can out of politics and bringing people back be in the market; there ought not be make life better for others—I am not into politics and speaking to the eco- going to speak for others—I think this nomic pain that exists among citizens any safety net; so a family farmer has been a do-nothing Congress, I real- in our country. should not have any real leverage for ly do. I start with agriculture. I am from an bargaining for a decent price. You I will make one other point before I agricultural State. We have a failed name it. It was a great bill for grain talk about this dairy compact, and it is farm policy that is driving family companies, a great bill for the packers, this: I am hearing so much discussion farmers off the land. We have not done but not a very good bill for family about testing. George W. is talking a thing about the price crisis. We have farmers. On the other hand, when it about testing third graders, and if they had another bailout. We have some came to dairy, it was a different set of do not pass those tests, they do not go money for people so they can live to rules. And we were going to have these on to fourth grade. It is high-stakes farm another day, but we have not dairy compacts with administered testing, and by the way, I will have an changed a thing when it comes to farm- prices. amendment next year to the Elemen- ers being able to get a decent price. We Our dairy producers were just asking tary and Secondary Education Act have not changed a thing when it for a fair shot—dairy producers in which makes sure we do not start test- comes to all the concentration of States such as Wisconsin and Min- ing at that young of an age. power in agriculture and in the media nesota. Here is the point. Jonathan Kozol and in banking and in energy and in Let me explain. In my State, we have wrote a book ‘‘Savage Inequalities,’’ in health insurance companies. We do not 8,700 dairy farms. We rank fifth in the which he points out—and all of us want to take on these big conglom- Nation in milk production. These know this about our States—some erates. We do not want to talk about farms generate about $1.2 billion for school districts have the best tech- antitrust action. our farmers each year. The average size nology, a beautiful building, recruit So I argue that at the macrolevel of the Minnesota dairy farm is about 60 the best teachers, have the best lab fa- this has been a do-nothing Congress. I cows—60 cows per farm. We are talking cilities, the best textbooks, and other think people in the country should about family-size farm operations. We schools have none of that. We do not do hold us accountable. I say to the ma- are going to lose many more because anything to change that. jority party, I think they should espe- this compact, for all sorts of reasons so I cite a second bit of evidence. We cially hold the majority party account- negative, impacts on our dairy farmers. have all these reports and studies, ir- able because I think many of us have Mr. President, I am disgraced by the refutable evidence that if you do not wanted to do much more. I think that recent action by the majority party to get it right for children by kinder- is what the next election probably will include such harmful dairy provisions garten, many of them come to school be all about. to the State of Minnesota as part of way behind and they fall further be- If people believe education and the final spending bill this year. The hind and then they drop out. This is health care and opportunities for their tactics used to include dairy as part of
VerDate 29-OCT-99 03:39 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G19NO6.028 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 S14850 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 19, 1999 this bill is yet another illustration of cows next year. Our 22-year-old son would The son and wife had to let their the flagrant abuse of power. I and my like to farm with us. But for us to do so he trailerhouse go since they could not make fellow colleagues have fought hard and must buy out my husband’s mother (his the payments and moved into a home owned have been successful in defeating pre- grandmother) because my husband and I who by a relative for the winter. Most of their are 47-years-old, still are unable to take over machinery is being liquidated. However, vious attempts to extend the Northeast the family farm. Our son must acquire a be- there are a few pieces of machinery that go Dairy Compact. We fought openly and ginning farmer loan. But should he shoulder toward paying off their existing debt. The fairly on the Senate floor, and now our that debt if there is no stable milk price? We family will be selling off 120 acres of land in successful efforts may be unjustly cur- continuously are told by bankers, veterinar- their struggle to reduce the debt. Recently, tailed by clandestine negotiations by ians and ag suppliers that we need to get big- the father has been having serious back trou- those who overtly misuse their power. ger or we will not survive. At 120 cows, we bles and has been unable to help his son with This type of backroom negotiating can manage our herd and farm effectively the work. This is tremendous stress both style is clearly not the first time that and efficiently. We should not be forced to physically and mentally on the son. The son harmful dairy provisions have been at- expand in order to survive. has decided he is going to have to sell part of the herd in order to reduce the herd to a tached to the bill. We have been fight- Lynn Jostock, a Waseca, MN dairy farmer: number that is more manageable for one per- ing such tactics since the authoriza- son. In addition, the money acquired from tion of the compact. In fact, the au- I have four children. My 11-year-old son Al selling off part of the herd will be applied to- helps my husband and I by doing chores. But thorization of the Northeast Dairy ward their debt. The son hopes that these it often is too much to expect of someone so Compact was inserted into the 1996 three items combined: selling machinery, young. For instance, one day our son came land and part of the herd can pay off enough farm bill as part of a backroom deal. In home from school. His father asked Al for of their debt that he might be able to do 1996, I offered an amendment which some help driving the tractor to another some restructuring on the remainder of the successfully struck the compact out of farm about 3 miles away. Al was going to farm and to reduce loan payments to a man- the Senate bill and the compact was come home right afterward. But he wound up ageable amount where there is something helping his father cut hay. Then he helped not in the farm bill initially passed by left to live on after payments are made. either House of Congress. Instead, it rake hay. Then he helped bale hay. My son These are just a few of the stories. I was later inserted during the bill’s con- did not return home until 9:30 p.m. He had read these stories, because it is impor- ference in the passage of the 1996 Free- not yet eaten supper. He had not yet done his schoolwork. We don’t have other help. The tant that when we consider national dom to Farm bill. Yet ironically, the price we get at the farm gate isn’t enough to dairy policy here in the Senate, we 1996 Freedom to Farm bill was passed allow us to hire any farmhands or to help our need to keep in mind that we are deter- with the intent to remove government community by providing more jobs. And it mining the future of an industry and a from the marketplace. Although, I ada- isn’t fair to ask your 11-year-old son to work way of life that are basic not only to mantly opposed the bill, many viewed so hard to keep the family going. When will the agricultural economy, but to the the 1996 farm bill as a way to decouple he burn out? How will he ever want to farm? very soul of America’s rural heartland. payments to family farmers. The Les Kyllo, a Goodhue dairy farmer: I am concerned that the dairy provi- thought at that time was that farmers My grandfather milked 15 cows. My dad sions attached to this omnibus bill will should produce for the market and that milked 26. I have milked as many as 100 hurt Minnesota dairy farmers and Congress should eliminate a safety net cows, and I’m going broke. They made a liv- frankly dairy farmers throughout the for our farmers. ing out here and I didn’t. Since my son went For some reason, we seemed to play away to college, my farmhands are my 73- country. I have been on the floor before year-old father and my 77-year-old father-in- discussing how the dairy compacts and by a different set of rules when it law who has an artificial hip. comes to dairy. We told our corn and any reversal to the implementation of I have a barn that needs repairs and up- an equitable milk marketing system soybean farmers that to succeed in the dates that I can’t afford. I have two children 21st century they should pay close at- that don’t want to farm. At one point, in a will harm Minnesota dairy farmers. tention to market signals, but at the 30-mile radius, there were 15 Kyllos farming. However, the dairy language included same time we considered implementing Now there are three. And now I’m selling my in this bill goes even further and could compacts that drown out those signals cows. My family has farmed since my ances- potentially threaten all family dairy tors emigrated to the United States. for dairy farmers. And yet even among farmers throughout the nation. When I leave farming, my community will What I am talking about and con- dairy producers, we scrutinized and lose the $15,000 I spend locally each year for cerned about as are many Americans is only allowed one region of the country cattle feed; the $3,000 I spend at the veteri- the trend towards factory-farm and to provide a safety net for their farm- narian; the $3,600 I spend for electricity; or concentration in dairy. It is unneces- ers, while hurting farmers in other the money I spend for fuel, cattle insemina- sary and unwise. There is no reason we parts of the country. tion and other farm needs. Minnesota is not asking for special The testimony I just read were from cannot have a family-farm based dairy favors. All Minnesota dairy producers MN farmers who felt comfortable to system. A dairy system which pro- are asking for is a fair shot. I have spo- share their names. I have additional motes economic vitality in rural com- ken here before about the importance testimony, but the farmers who shared munities and one which is more envi- of family dairy farming to my State’s their stories, had requested that I not ronmentally sustainable than a fac- economy. Minnesota’s dairy industry is use their name. This is testimony from tory-farm system. Family dairy farms one of the cornerstones of the State’s a farmer in East Ottertail, MN: are efficient and innovative. Family dairy farms can provide a plentiful sup- economy. We have 8,700 dairy farms in Despite the ongoing difficulties, it is amaz- Minnesota, ranking fifth in the Na- ing the steadfast willingness of this family ply of wholesome milk at a fair price. tion’s milk production. The milk pro- to try and hold things together. The farm is However, there is a provision stuck in duction from Minnesota farms gen- farmed by two families, a father and his son. this bill which no one has really dis- erates more than $1.2 billion for our Since dairy prices fell in the second quar- cussed, and would harm family dairy ter of 1999, there was not enough income for farmers everywhere. The provision farmers each year. Yet, the average this family to make the loan payments and herd size of a Minnesota dairy farm is would establish a pilot program allow- to provide for family living and cover farm ing for the expansion of forward con- about 60 cows. Sixty cows per farm. So operating expenses. The Farm Credit Serv- we are really talking about family op- ices would not release a loan for farm oper- tracting of milk. erations in my State. Family busi- ating assistance, and so the family had to Forward contracting reduces com- nesses with a total of $1.2 billion in borrow money from the lender from which petition in the marketplace and results sales a year, contributing to their they are already leasing their cows. They in lower prices to dairy producers. For- small-town economies, trying to live a have not been able to feed the cows properly ward contracting is not specific to the productive life on the land. because of the lack of funds. Because they dairy industry. In fact, one can note Let me read from a few farmers in cannot adequately feed their dairy herd, the effect of forward contracting by the their milk production has fallen and is con- my State of Minnesota who are recent events occurring in the hog in- siderably lower than the herd’s average pro- dustry. Recently, the hog industry has hurting: duction. In addition, because there was no Eunice Biel, a Harmony, MN dairy money for family living, the parents had to witnessed a significant increase in the farmer: cash out what little retirement savings they number of producers who decided to We currently milk 100 cows and just built had so that the two families had something forward contract. Hog producers will a new milking parlor. We will be milking 120 to live on day to day. contract with packers to guarantee
VerDate 29-OCT-99 03:39 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.004 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S14851 them a minimum price for their pigs. and it is a good price. Farmers could be Many, such as I heard Senator LEAHY Contracting is not inherently bad and pleased with that price. In September inquire, why doesn’t the Upper Mid- there are some good contracts. How- the BFP rose a little higher to $16.26 west form their own compact. Min- ever, what is occurring is that these per hundredweight. I haven’t seen the nesota and Wisconsin farmers would deals are made often in private and do analysis of why the BFP price rose so not benefit from organizing their own not reflect the spot market. There is a high. Back in May of 1999, the BFP was compact. A compact’s price boost ap- strong argument that contracting is only $11.26. Some would argue that it plies for only fluid milk. The percent- partly responsible for the depressed was due to the drought in the East that age of Upper Midwest milk going into hog prices and the rapid increase in the prices rose so high for August and Sep- fluid products is so low that any com- consolidation of the hog industry. tember. The milk price was high be- pact would do little for Minnesota’s What is happening in the hog industry cause cows in the eastern region were farmers’ income. The negative impact is also happening in dairy. strained and produces less milk. There- of compacts would far outweigh any This provision would expand forward fore, milk was in demand and thus the minimal boost to fluid prices here in contracting of milk by allowing proc- price rose. If this is the case, our farm- Minnesota. Congress should not accept essors to pay producers less than the ers are getting a decent price for their a policy that so clearly provides bene- federal milk price for milk. Under cur- milk only at the expense of farmers in fits to the producers of one region at rent law, forward contracting is al- other parts of the country who are suf- the expense of consumers and pro- lowed, however, only if the buyer is fering. ducers elsewhere. Instead, there should willing to offer at least as much as the In October, the BFP took a stum- be an effort to create a more uniform federal minimum price. In other words, bling tumble from the $16.26-September and rational national dairy policy—a this provision will remove an impor- price to $11.49 per hundredweight. This policy without the regional fragmenta- tant safety net for our dairy producers. is a dramatic drop price. The BFP for tion caused by compacts. Expanded forward contracting can also this month will not be released until To put it simply, compacts erect reduce the price for producers who do December 3rd, but it is predicted to be trade barriers in our country. By fixing not forward contract by reducing the even lower. Again, as I have stated be- milk prices at artificially high levels, competition for milk, thereby dam- fore with such volatility in the market, Compact proponents understand that it is no question why our farmers are aging the entire dairy market struc- their markets become vulnerable to having a difficult time to survive. And ture. This provision could also dis- market forces at work elsewhere in the if dairy farmers are not struggling criminate against our family farmers nation. So in order to prevent milk enough with the volatility of the mar- because the most likely scenario is from other regions entering those Com- ket, Congress is now assisting and in that processors would offer forward some cases is making the price of my pact markets at lower prices, a tariff- contracts to the largest producers. dairy farmers worse—and that is what like mechanism is established to en- Again, we would see the domino effect has happened with the Northeast Dairy sure that all milk entering the Com- of losing family farmers. By giving a Compact. The Northeast Dairy Com- pact area is priced at the level fixed by better deal to larger producers, our pact gives six states the right to join the price-fixing commission in the re- family farmers cannot compete and we together to raise prices to help pro- gion. It is bad enough that the exten- would see more losses of family farm- ducers in the region. While it may help sion of the Northeast Dairy Compact is ers. the Northeast, it is cutting into our attached to this bill, but it is unaccept- Those who support forward con- markets. It is true that the compact able for Congress to attempt to meddle tracting contend that forward con- provided a safety net this spring to cer- with USDA’s final plan by resurrecting tracting is a risk management tool; tain farmers when dairy prices an alternative similar to Option 1–A. however, this argument doesn’t hold plunged. When the price of raw milk As you know, the referendum voted water. In fact, National Farmers’ dropped by 37 percent, one Massachu- on by producers nationwide over- Union and other groups contend that setts farmer got a $2,100 check from the whelming passed this past summer. the proposal for forward contracting compact. Overall, that farmer said, aid Given the prominence of Minnesota’s will actually make it more difficult to from the compact totaled seven per- dairy industry, it should be no surprise manage risk by forcing producers to cent of his gross income during the that I have pushed for reform of the ex- guess whether the volatile dairy mar- first 12 months of its operation. Con- isting milk pricing system. The Sec- ket will go up or down. It is logically versely, Midwest dairy farmers—who retary’s reforms are a step forward in a deduced that in the absence of an ade- also confronted the sharp price de- long overhaul of dairy policy toward a quate support price, the market will cline—got no such price. more unified and simplified pricing continue to be highly volatile. What The Northeast Dairy Compact fixes system that benefits all producers. We can happen is that anytime producers fluid milk prices at artificially high need to reduce and eliminate the re- price guess wrong, they lose money prices for the benefit of dairy producers gional inequities that exist within the under this proposal. The truth is that in just that region. This artificial price federal order system. The current pric- our family dairy farmers cannot com- boost of a compact may benefit the ing system regulates the price of fluid pete in such a volatile market place. producers covered by the compact, but milk based on the distance from Eau We must set policy that keeps family it hurts all other dairy farmers. It is Claire, Wisconsin. This policy causes dairy farms in business while ensuring also no secret that the extension of the market distortions that disadvantage that consumer and taxpayer costs are Northeast Compact encourages other producers in the Upper Midwest. These kept at a reasonable level. What we regions such as the Southeast to form reforms must move forward quickly, need to achieve here is a fair, sustain- their own compact. This would be det- and be implemented as soon as possible able and stable price system for all rimental to the Upper Midwest. A re- by the Secretary. dairy farmers. cent report by University of Missouri These dairy provisions are putting at That has clearly not happened, and dairy economist Ken Baily found that great risk dairy farmers not just in my that’s partly why Minnesota continues Minnesota’s farm-level milk price State, but across the country. It is im- to lose dairy farmers at an appalling would drop at least 21 cents per hun- perative that we establish a national rate. Minnesota is losing dairy farms dredweight if a Southeast dairy com- and equitable dairy system for all. For at the rate of three per day due to base pact were allowed to be implemented this reason, and among numerous other price that are already low and unsta- alongside expanded Northeast dairy inequities included as part of this ble. Let me read to you the past couple compact. This would translate into a mammoth omnibus package, I cannot of BFP prices for family dairy farmers. $27.2 million annual reduction of Min- vote for the bill. The BFP is the basic formula price. It nesota farm milk sales. The compacts Mr. President, milk prices per 100 is the monthly base price per hundred- in Baily’s study would cover only 27 weight were about $16. Now they are weight paid to dairy farmers for their percent of U.S. milk production, yet down to $11. They are going down fur- milk. would have a sizable negative impact. ther. We do not have any kind of na- In August the BFP was $15.79 per If more regions adopted compacts Min- tional dairy policy that makes any hundredweight. That was quite high nesota prices would drop even further. sense.
VerDate 29-OCT-99 03:39 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.005 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 S14852 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 19, 1999 What has happened, which affects Eu- just mentioned, put into this amend- what has been done on a whole lot of nice Biel and Lynn Jostock, and Les ment, and now this omnibus conference other decisions. It is no way to legis- Kyllo, and all sorts of other farmers report is brought to us, and we cannot late. who will remain anonymous but whose amend it. We can’t amend it. I can’t I contend that that is no way to leg- statements are included in the RECORD come to the floor of the Senate and islate. I contend that this omnibus bill —they do not want their names used— deal with this forward contracting of makes a mockery of the legislative it is hard when you are going through milk without the safety net. I can’t process. I contend on the floor of the pain, and you are working 19 hours a come to the floor of the Senate with an Senate today, not only because of what day, and you are going to lose your amendment to knock out this amend- happened to dairy farmers in Min- farm. ment. You get a few people who decide nesota but because of the whole way in What has happened, to add salt to the in a closed room, outside of any scru- which this decisionmaking process has wound, insult to injury, is that in the tiny, and they put this back in. worked, that this is unconscionable. I dark of night in a conference com- I am outraged. But we fought this contend that this kind of decision- mittee a few people—it did not pass the every way we know how. Today is the making process is going to lead to Senate; they did not get it through— last day. There will be a vote, and we more and more disillusionment on the they put through a provision that ex- can’t stop that vote—whether it be at 1 part of people in the country. tended this Northeast Dairy Compact, a.m. or in midafternoon. To me, that is People hate the mix of money and which would have run out, and they no longer an issue. We have done every- politics. They don’t like poison poli- blocked the Secretary of Agriculture thing we can. tics. They don’t like all the hack-at- from being able to move forward with But I say to my colleagues that I tack politics my colleagues, Senator milk marketing order reform. think what has been done to the dairy REID and Senator DURBIN, were talking They have another provision which farmers in the Midwest is an injustice. about earlier because they believe that would allow for a pilot project for the I think it is an injustice in a piece of is what is wrong. They don’t like what, expansion of the forward contracting of legislation that, in and of itself, apparently, some of us relish. They milk. That is what we have had in the doesn’t represent all that much for don’t like backroom deals, decision- hog industry. Contracting is not inher- America, even though I know every- making that is not open, accountable, ently bad, but what happens is these body will be talking about how great and that people can understand and arrangements are made in private; this is. I am certainly going to vote comprehend. they do not reflect the spot market. against it. Now, my final point. I am not so sure Basically, what happens is, you are I also say to my colleagues that I that some of the major decision- going to have this consolidated indus- hope we will, next year, think about makers, given the sort of deck of cards try, as in the hog industry. And what how we can reform the way we operate. they had to work with—I don’t know will happen is that the processors will On this, I hold the majority leader ac- that I want to point the finger at any be able to pay the producers less than countable—to the extent that I can one person. I don’t think that is prob- the Federal milk price for milk. In hold him accountable. And I will figure ably fair. I am making an argument other words, under current law, for- out every way I can next year, when we about process, not about a particular ward contracting is allowed; however, come back, to keep raising this issue. Senator. Some of them who were in- only if the buyer is willing to offer at We didn’t get a lot of these appro- volved in this probably did everything least as much as the Federal minimum priations bills done. We had a lot of they could do from their point of view. price. But this little-known provision— legislation that came to the floor. We They are very skillful. But I will tell you one thing. Minnesota dairy farm- never debated on the floor of the Sen- weren’t allowed to do amendments. ers came out on the short end of the ate—would now remove that important Frankly, I don’t know how anybody in here thinks we can be good legislators stick. safety net for our dairy producers. I regret the fact that this has been Processors are going to offer better for- when we don’t have the bills coming to the floor. We need to get them out here done and stuck into a conference re- ward contracts to the larger producers, port and was not done in an honest to the largest producers, and our dairy in the open and have debates that are introduced, have up-or-down votes, and way, with open debate on the floor of farms are going to go under. the Senate, where we could have In Minnesota, we continue to lose then we move forward. And if we have amendments. I also regret a legislative dairy farms at an appalling rate. Min- to work from 9 in the morning until 9 process where we didn’t get to the bills nesota is losing dairy farms at the rate at night, so be it. But instead, we don’t on time, didn’t have the debate on the of three per day due to a base price do our work. floor, didn’t have amendments we that is already so low and so unstable. Those of us who believe the Senate could introduce, didn’t have the up-or- I say to each and every one of my floor is the place to fight for what we down votes, and it all got done by a few colleagues that it is a triple blow to ag- believe in and have the debates are not people, really, basically, with very lit- riculture, to dairy farmers, in Min- able to do so. Instead, we have this tle opportunity for public scrutiny, for nesota. First of all, again, this horren- process where six, seven, eight people decide what is in and what is out, and democratic accountability. dous piece of legislation, which was I am going to vote ‘‘no’’ on this bill. we have this huge monstrosity called passed in 1996, that I think the Senate I think I would vote ‘‘no’’ just on the the ‘‘omnibus’’ bill that is presented to should be ashamed of, took the bar- issue of the way in which these deci- us, which none of us has read—or gaining power away from farmers. sions have been made because, again, I maybe two people have. But none of us They cannot even get a price to sur- think we have made a mockery of what has read this from cover to cover. I vive. should be the legislative process. We have a depression in agriculture. doubt whether there are more than two I yield the floor. We are going to lose a whole genera- Senators who know everything that is The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Sen- tion of producers. The way this hap- in here. ator from Maine is recognized. I would like to raise the question, pened, with the Northeast Dairy Com- f pact, was to put that into the con- How can we be good legislators with ference report. It never passed on the this kind of process? We are not being UNANIMOUS CONSENT floor. It was part of the whole deal that good legislators. I am speaking for my- AGREEMENT made this bill possible. self. I am not able to be an effective Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I ask Then this dairy compact was going to legislator representing Minnesota if we unanimous consent that the Senator expire in 2 years. We had a vote on it. are going to continue making decisions from Iowa, Mr. GRASSLEY, be recog- It did not get through the Senate. It in conference committees and rolling nized for approximately 10 minutes, if came back into the conference com- in six, seven, eight major pieces of leg- that is sufficient for the Senator. mittee, in this horrendous process— islation with no opportunity for me as Mr. GRASSLEY. I think it is. which will be my last point about this a Senator from Minnesota to bring Ms. COLLINS. I also ask unanimous process—no vote, no public discussion, amendments to the floor. That was consent that he be followed by the Sen- all sorts of provisions, one of which I done on the dairy compact, and that is ator from New York, Mr. SCHUMER, for
VerDate 29-OCT-99 03:39 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G19NO6.030 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S14853 not to exceed 5 minutes, and that I be whatsoever that are kept just between dian-United States free trade agree- recognized to transact legislative busi- negotiators. ment. ness. In other words, if Congress is going The United States insisted that Can- The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without to legislate these agreements and se- ada was, indeed, selling wheat below objection, it is so ordered. cure these agreements, Congress has a cost in violation of the agreement. The Senator from Iowa is recognized. responsibility not only to make sure Canada denied the violation. The dis- f everything is on the table but to make pute was even taken to a binational sure the administration puts every- panel for resolution. CHINA’S ACCESSION TO THE thing on the table. In the argument before the bina- WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION Let me be clear about this. There is tional panel for dispute resolution, the Mr. GRASSLEY. Mr. President, in an absolute requirement of disclosure. Canadian side at that time produced a my capacity as chairman of the Inter- Congress must see everything that is letter from a few years back from the national Trade Subcommittee and get- negotiated. And it has not always been United States Trade Representative to ting ready for the Seattle Round, as this way, or I wouldn’t be to the floor the Canadians supporting the Canadian well as considering China’s accession asking my colleagues to consider this, interpretation of the provision and to the World Trade Organization, I and with an admonition to the admin- very devastating to the case brought want to speak on Congress’ power and istration to make sure everything is by the United States. our responsibility on the whole issue of given to Congress. When congressional The question now is whether the U.S. international trade. approval is required, only what we see Trade Representative’s letter, or his It is very clear in the Constitution and vote on should become the law. interpretation of this controversial and that the Congress of the United States Nothing should become the law of the important provision, was properly re- has the power, as one of the specifi- land that is secretly negotiated and ported to the Congress before we con- cally delineated powers of Congress in that isn’t submitted to Congress for sidered that agreement, voted on it, the first article, to regulate interstate our approval. and it became the law of the land. and foreign commerce. So the United Because there have been problems in Some might argue that it was dis- States has just concluded a bilateral this area in the past, Senator CONRAD closed. Others say it was not. market access agreement with China. of North Dakota and I have introduced In my view, because the issue of Can- It should pave the way for China’s ac- legislation. This legislation is con- ada’s price support system for wheat cession to the World Trade Organiza- tained in the African trade bill. That was such a politically sensitive issue in tion. trade bill was recently approved by the the context of the NAFTA agreement, From what I have heard about this Senate. I will work very hard to see there should not have been any room agreement—and, of course, we only that this provision is part of the final for doubt what the administration’s in- have summaries at this point—it is an bill approved by conference committee terpretation was. The disclosure of the exceptionally good one for the United before the African trade bill is sent to administration’s interpretation of this States and especially for American ag- the President. key language should have been fully riculture. I said, when the agreement Why are we where we are today with and completely disclosed—not just in fell through on April 8, I was fearful what Senator CONRAD and I have tried the fine print or in response to ques- that a lot of ground would be lost. I to accomplish, and did accomplish, as tions raised by a Senator at a hearing. don’t think, from what I know, there far as the Senate is concerned? Unfor- When important issues of foreign has been any ground lost with the re- tunately, past administrations have commerce are at stake and Congress is negotiation. Charlene Barshefsky, our not complied with their basic prin- exercising its constitutional power of U.S. Trade Representative, conducted ciples of complete disclosure and com- regulating foreign commerce, we in the herself in a highly professional way plete openness in their submittal of Congress should not have to guess what and negotiated what appears to be an agreements to the Congress. A prior the answer is or even have to figure out excellent agreement, and she did it administration—it happened to be a how to ask the right questions in the under very difficult circumstances. Republican administration—violated hearing at the right time and in the Now that the negotiations are fin- the spirit, if not the letter, of this ab- right way to get an honest answer, to ished, the job of the Senate and the solute good faith requirement of com- have open disclosure of what our agree- House of Representatives becomes even plete disclosure. This incident occurred ments are and what the results of the more important. Our constitutional re- in 1988. I want to give background on it negotiation are. sponsibility requires that the Senate because it was in regard to the Cana- This incident on the wheat and the and the House carefully review the dian Free Trade Agreement which be- Canadian Free Trade Agreement had agreement in its entirety, and the ex- came part of the North American Free unfortunate and profound con- tent to which there are changes in law, Trade Agreement. sequences. It led some in Congress to they obviously have to pass the Con- At that time, there was disagreement believe they could not trust our nego- gress, as any law would, and be signed about the meaning of a term relating tiators. Some of us believed we weren’t by the President. to Canada’s price support system for dealt with fairly. The American wheat It is a responsibility every Senator wheat. farmer has been harmed as a result of takes very seriously because it is as- If anybody has heard the articulate it. signed to us by the Constitution. And speaking of the Senator from North Now, I want to say I have the highest because the Congress has a unique and Dakota on this issue—Senator CONRAD regard for our negotiators, especially close relationship with the American has talked about this many times, for Ambassador Barshefsky. She has people, we must also keep faith with about wheat unfairly coming into the done a remarkable job. She has my the people who sent us here to fulfill northern United States in violation of complete trust. So this is not about our constitutional responsibilities. the free trade agreement but somehow Ambassador Barshefsky. It is not about That is why it is critical we know ev- being legal because of these side agree- any one of our negotiators. Nor is this erything that was negotiated. ments that Congress didn’t know about a partisan concern. The incident that I want to put emphasis upon that in the past. sparked my concern occurred during a statement. There was a disagreement about the Republican administration. I am con- That is why it is important that the meaning of a term relating to Canada’s cerned about one simple thing. The Congress of the United States know ev- price support system for wheat. The principle of openness and full disclo- erything that was negotiated—every- issue dealt with whether the Canadians sure to Congress. thing, every issue, every detail, and were manipulating their price support This simple, basic principle applies every interpretation—so there can be system by unfairly defining a very key not just to the agreement with China. no surprises, no private exchanges of term in their favor, thus allowing them In about ten days, the United States letters, no private understandings to sell wheat below cost in the United will help launch a new round of global about the key meanings of key phrases States market in violation of the clear trade negotiations in Seattle. This new in the agreement, and no reservations meaning of a provision of the Cana- round of trade liberalization talks will
VerDate 29-OCT-99 03:39 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G19NO6.032 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 S14854 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 19, 1999 cover agriculture, services, and other Yorkers in two ways. The Satellite it is they who seek to thwart the will key trade issues. Many of these issues Home Viewer Act will finally allow of the majority of the House and the are sensitive, and even controversial. rural residents in rural areas to receive Senate when they try at the last We must be confident that we will local television programming, and the minute to stop an omnibus bill from see everything that is negotiated in the dairy language in the omnibus final going through. We need this compact. new round before it can become law. package allows both option 1–A and the In New York and New England, the The legislation Senator CONRAD and I New England Dairy Compact to con- price of milk has not risen by more wrote that is part of the Africa trade tinue. Let me touch on both of these. It than 4 cents over the national average bill requires full disclosure to Congress is clearly two dollops of good news for in every given year. I say to my of all agreements or understandings rural New Yorkers. downstate constituents, to keep an in- with a foreign government relating to On the satellite bill, I have had con- dustry vital to all New Yorkers going, agricultural trade negotiations—what stituent after constituent in areas such is it worth it to pay that 4 cents? Al- we refer to here as agricultural trade as Allegany County and Chenango most everyone says yes. With senior negotiations, objectives, and consulta- County and Steuben County and Ulster citizen centers, WIC, and other types of tion. County, throughout New York State in good programs being exempt, this is a Anyway, our provision says that any rural areas, tell me all of a sudden they worthy piece of legislation. I think it is such agreement or understanding that were unable to receive over the air sig- a good day for the dairy farmers of New is not disclosed to Congress before leg- nals to receive local satellite program- York. islation implementing a trade agree- ming. Imagine being cut off. Imagine It is not all we wanted; I admit that. ment is introduced in the Congress for years depending on the weather re- We want New York to be added to the shall not become law. In other words, if ports before you took your kids to Northeast Dairy Compact, and we will Congress doesn’t know about the agree- school or because you are a farmer and fight like the devil to make that hap- ment, it should not become law. That then not being able to get them. Imag- pen in future years. Without 1–A and is very simple. It is very clear. It is a ine having your local news shows cut the existing dairy compact, which still restatement of the principle of full dis- off. Imagine not being able to see benefits New York dairy farms in the closure. It is consistent with Congress’ things your family was accustomed to north country and places such as Wash- constitutional responsibility for for- seeing, all because of a court action. ington and Warren Counties and in cen- eign commerce, but I understand the Today, that bill, that court action, is tral New York, those areas without the administration opposes this common- being overruled in the omnibus act. I New England Dairy Compact, we would sense provision. They want it removed am delighted to say half a million New have suffered dramatically. Adding in- from the bill. York residents will now be able to get sult to injury, not having option 1–A Mr. President, it says in the Conrad- their local signal from their satellite would have been devastating. Grassley bill, no secret side deals. The which they were not able to do before— In the last decade, New York State Congress agreed that there should be half a million people, all back the way has lost one-third of its dairy farms, fully submitted to Congress all of the they should be. 13,000 to 8,600. The dairy compact and provisions of any negotiations that I hope we will continue the progress option 1–A will help my State and re- must be approved by Congress. I don’t of the Satellite Home Viewer Act. The gion retain this vital and cherished in- know why the administration wants Federal provision was taken out. I un- dustry. I believe that can be done not this language removed from the trade derstand the Senate Banking Com- at the expense of our counterparts in bill, but this is what they have sent to mittee plans to hold hearings next year the Midwest. the conferees in the Congress of the to ensure that multiservice providers In conclusion, it is a good day for United States. They list this section are encouraged to extend competition. rural New Yorkers in this omnibus bill. that says no secret side deals. They are I want to work with my colleagues to No. 1, the Satellite Home Viewer Act suggesting we strike this subsection. make sure my constituents in upstate will allow half a million New York We cannot let this happen. I will do rural New York, central New York, the families to receive local signal once everything I can to make sure this west and southern tier, and in the again; and, an extension of the dairy physical disclosure provision becomes north country have the same viewing compact, as well as extension of option the law of the land when the House and options as those in downstate. 1–A, will allow our dairy farmers who Senate conferees finally consider the The other bit of good news, of course, have been struggling over the last dec- African trade bill. I believe our Gov- is the dairy language in the final bill. ade to have a better chance to survive, ernment should live by the same stand- First, I know some of my colleagues to grow, and to prosper in one of the ards we expect from farmers in my from Wisconsin and Minnesota have la- industries most vital to all of New hometown of New Hartford, IA, or any bored long and hard on behalf of their York State. businessman in Des Moines, IA. Tell us constituents in this regard. I salute The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under exactly what you mean. Show us every- their hard work, their tenacity, and the previous agreement, the Senator thing in the agreement. Act in good their diligence. I heard the Senator from Maine is recognized. faith. from Minnesota say the average dairy f I ask my colleagues to support this farm in his State has 60 cows. It is no SENATE ACCOMPLISHMENTS provision and vote for it when it comes different in New York. We don’t have back from the conference committee so large farms, by and large. We shouldn’t Ms. COLLINS. For the information of we have physical disclosure of every- be pitting one against the other. With- all of our colleagues, I inform Senators thing so Congress isn’t asked to vote out 1–A and without the dairy compact that we are still working out some on something that is secret, that we we would have had desperate times in last-minute issues that will then allow don’t know anything about. If we do rural New York for our dairy farmers. the Senate to move a number of impor- that, we are violating our constitu- We are the third largest dairy State. tant bills that have been cleared on tional responsibility to the people of Dairy is a vital industry in much of both sides. While we are waiting for this country. New York. these last-minute glitches to be re- The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under If option 1–B were allowed to be im- solved, I want to take this opportunity the previous agreement the Senator plemented, New York would experience to respond to some of the comments from New York is recognized for 5 min- the single largest loss of any State, made by my colleagues on the other utes. $30.5 million a year. Compacts, of side of the aisle this morning. f course, are necessary. The 1–A option I am disappointed in some of the passed both Houses. This is not some- process, and I do not support all of the GOOD NEWS FOR RURAL NEW thing being done in the dark of night provisions of the omnibus appropria- YORK and not being debated. Both Houses, tions bill which we will consider later Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, today after full debate, passed both compacts. this day, but I very much disagree with I am happy to say there is good news in I say with all due respect to my col- the assertions made by some of my col- the omnibus budget bill for rural New leagues from Minnesota and Wisconsin, leagues on the other side of the aisle
VerDate 29-OCT-99 03:39 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.002 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S14855 that we have not accomplished any- there has been a devastating impact on ardize their ability to provide care. thing during this Congress. We have, in the senior citizens of our country. Let These hospitals, in most cases, are the fact, accomplished a great deal of me use the example of the State of only hospital in the community. If which we can be proud. Rather than en- Maine. As you can see, in just a year’s they are forced to close because of un- gaging in harsh partisan rhetoric, we time, more than 6,000 Maine senior citi- fair and inadequate reimbursements should be coming together in these zens have lost their access to home from Medicare, it will devastate the final hours of this session to celebrate care. In fact, it is 6,600 Maine seniors communities. It will leave many of our what we have done for the American who have lost their access to home senior citizens and others in the com- people. health care. The number of home munity without access to health care First of all, I think we can take great health care visits in Maine has de- at all when they become ill and need pride in the accomplishment that we clined by more than 420,000. Reimburse- hospitalization. will be producing a balanced budget for ments to Maine’s home health agencies One of the features of the cutbacks in the first time in decades, one which have declined in a year’s time by more home health care troubles me. I wonder does not raid the Social Security trust than $20 million. what has become of these nearly 7,000 fund. This is a tremendous accomplish- Maine’s home health agencies have Maine citizens. In some cases they ment and it establishes a new mile- had a long tradition of providing low- have been forced to pay for the care stone in fiscal responsibility. It has cost compassionate care. We are not themselves. Many of the seniors in been the Republican caucus that has talking about home health agencies Maine simply cannot afford that kind held firm in their determination to pre- that were in any way abusing the sys- of out-of-pocket expense. They are liv- vent one penny of the Social Security tem, making too many visits, or over- ing on Social Security, on limited in- trust fund from being diverted to sup- billing Medicare. We are talking about comes. They already have a very dif- port expensive new unrelated Govern- home health agencies that were cost ef- ficult time affording their prescription ment programs. We have succeeded. We fective and efficient, providing quality drugs. Some of them have become sick- have kept that commitment. We have er because they have lost their access low-cost care throughout the State of fulfilled our obligation to the senior to home health care and have pre- Maine. citizens of this country. For the first I have visited with many of these maturely been forced into nursing time in 30 years, the Congress has pro- seniors who have lost access to home homes or have been subject to repeated duced a balanced budget which will re- health care. One was a retired priest in hospitalization which would have been sult in a surplus that does not rely on my hometown of Caribou, ME. He re- avoided had the home health care serv- funds from the Social Security trust lied on his home health services and ices been provided. The irony and the fund. The raid on the Social Security wrongheaded effect of this policy is we has now had to dig deeply into his sav- trust fund has been stopped cold. are probably going to end up paying ings to provide for the care out of his I give a great deal of credit to Sen- more for the care for these senior citi- own pocket because Medicare is no ator DOMENICI, to Senator STEVENS, to zens who have lost access to their longer providing the services he needs. Senator ABRAHAM, and to all col- In another case, I visited an elderly home health care because hospitaliza- leagues in the Republican caucus who couple in rural Maine who were able to tion and nursing home care is so much have united in their determination to stay together in their own home rather more expensive than home health care. secure the Social Security trust fund Surely this has been a shortsighted than go into a nursing home because of for our seniors and for future genera- policy. the valuable services provided by home tions. That is an accomplishment of I am pleased this legislation is going which we can be proud. health care nurses. The woman in this to take the first steps we need to pro- Second, I am delighted the omnibus case was severely diabetic. She was vide much needed financial relief to appropriations bill includes what has confined to a wheelchair and had a our Nation’s home health care agen- been my highest priority in the last wound that was not healing. It was cies, our rural hospitals, and our nurs- few months and that is to restore some home health care nurses who came ing homes. It is going to make a real of the unintended cuts made by the three times a week to clean the wound, difference. There is much else that is Balanced Budget Act of 1997 as well as to change the dressing, to take care of very valuable in this legislation for our by onerous regulations imposed by the her other health care needs. Home Nation’s families. Not only our senior Clinton administration that have im- health care allowed her and her elderly citizens but our children are going to paired the ability of our rural hos- husband to stay together in their gold- benefit from this legislation. pitals, our home health care agencies, en years. When you hear the rhetoric in this and our nursing homes to provide much It is that kind of service which has Chamber about education, you would needed quality health care to our Na- made such a difference to the quality think that somehow there has been an tion’s senior citizens. of life of our senior citizens, and it was attempt to slash education funding. The Presiding Officer has been an that kind of service which has been so Nothing could be further from the early supporter of legislation that I jeopardized by the ill-advised Clinton truth. In fact, the Republican Senate have introduced to provide financial administration regulations and the un- increased—increased, Mr. President— relief to our distressed home health intended consequences of the Balanced education spending by $500 million be- care agencies. America’s home health Budget Act of 1997. yond what was requested by President care agencies allow our senior citizens The legislation I introduced was a bi- Clinton in his budget. and our disabled citizens to receive the partisan bill. It was cosponsored by The increase also represents a sub- health care where they want it, in the more than 30 of my colleagues, to re- stantial hike in spending for education security and the privacy of their own verse these unintended consequences. programs over last year’s spending lev- homes. Unfortunately, under the Bal- The Balanced Budget Remedies Act els. In fact, the legislation we are anced Budget Act of 1997, and exacer- that is included in the omnibus appro- about to consider increases education bated by misguided policies of the Clin- priations bill does not go as far as I spending by $2 billion over the last fis- ton administration, America’s home would like, frankly, but it is a good cal year, and, again, the increase is health agencies have found their abil- and necessary first step. I commend $500 million over what the President ity to provide this care has been jeop- the chairman of the Finance Com- proposed. ardized. This care is so important to mittee, Senator ROTH, as well as Sen- Clearly, there is a deep and heartfelt our Nation’s senior citizens, particu- ator MOYNIHAN, for working with us to commitment in the Senate to increase larly those who are living in rural come up with legislation that we can education spending and to recognize its areas of our country where access to enact to ensure our senior citizens do importance to the future of this coun- home health care may spell the dif- not lose access to much needed health try and to ensuring a bright future for ference between staying in their own care. our Nation’s children. The issue has homes and having to travel many miles That is also a very important bill to not been about money. The issue has to receive health care. our rural hospitals. In our hospitals, in been who is best able to make edu- Unfortunately, since cutbacks in States such as Maine, we have been cation decisions. That is the debate we home health care have gone into effect, suffering from the cutbacks that jeop- will continue next year.
VerDate 29-OCT-99 03:39 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G19NO6.039 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 S14856 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 19, 1999 To me, the answer is obvious. We do could be cleaner, that we could work to Sec. 203. Certain transfers to be treated as a need to increase the Federal invest- get our legislation accomplished ear- separation from service for pur- ment in education, but at the same lier, that we had more cooperation poses of the thrift savings plan. Sec. 204. Clarifying amendments. time we need to empower our local with the White House in achieving this school boards, our parents, our teach- goal. But the fact is, this legislation TITLE III—AMENDMENT TO THE FEDERAL PROPERTY AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERV- ers, and our principals to make the de- will ensure brighter futures for the ICES ACT OF 1949 cisions and set the priorities. We need families of America. Sec. 301. Transfer of certain property to State to hold them accountable for improved I appreciate the opportunity to set and local governments. education achievement, but we do not the record straight on these important TITLE I—DECEPTIVE MAIL PREVENTION need a Washington-knows-best, a one- issues. The bill, which will be before us AND ENFORCEMENT size-fits-all approach to education pol- later today, is not perfect but it is good SEC. 101. SHORT TITLE. icy. legislation that deserves the support of This title may be cited as the ‘‘Deceptive Mail There is other good news in the om- all our colleagues. Prevention and Enforcement Act’’. nibus appropriations bill, and that is Mr. President, I suggest the absence SEC. 102. RESTRICTIONS ON MAILINGS USING good news for students and their fami- of a quorum. MISLEADING REFERENCES TO THE lies who are pursuing higher education. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT. Section 3001 of title 39, United States Code, is Since I have come to the Senate, one of clerk will call the roll. my highest priorities has been to in- amended— The legislative assistant proceeded (1) in subsection (h)— crease Pell grants and student loans so to call the roll. (A) in the first sentence by striking ‘‘contains that no qualified student faces a finan- Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I ask a seal, insignia, trade or brand name, or any cial barrier that makes it impossible unanimous consent that the order for other term or symbol that reasonably could be for him or her to attend college. the quorum call be rescinded. interpreted or construed as implying any Fed- Prior to coming to the Senate, I The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without eral Government connection, approval or en- worked at a small business and health dorsement’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘which objection, it is so ordered. college in Bangor, ME, known as reasonably could be interpreted or construed as Husson College. It was there that I f implying any Federal Government connection, first became aware of how critically approval, or endorsement through the use of a DECEPTIVE MAIL PREVENTION seal, insignia, reference to the Postmaster Gen- important Federal financial assistance AND ENFORCEMENT ACT eral, citation to a Federal statute, name of a was for students who are attending col- Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I ask Federal agency, department, commission, or pro- lege. gram, trade or brand name, or any other term or Eighty-five percent of the students at the Chair lay before the Senate a mes- symbol; or contains any reference to the Post- Husson College could not afford to at- sage from the House of Representatives master General or a citation to a Federal statute tend college but for the assistance they on the bill (S. 335) to amend chapter 30 that misrepresents either the identity of the were provided from student loans and of title 39, United States Code, to pro- mailer or the protection or status afforded such from Pell grants. This assistance was vide for the nonmailability of certain matter by the Federal Government’’; and absolutely essential in allowing them deceptive matter relating to sweep- (B) in paragraph (2)— stakes, skill contests, facsimile checks, (i) in subparagraph (A) by striking ‘‘and’’ at to attend college. Many of them were the end; first-generation college students. They administrative procedures, orders, and (ii) in subparagraph (B) by striking ‘‘or’’ at were the first people in their families civil penalties relating to such matter, the end and inserting ‘‘and’’; and to have the opportunity to attend col- and for other purposes. (iii) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the lege. They were taking a big step they The PRESIDING OFFICER laid be- following: knew would ensure a brighter future fore the Senate the following message ‘‘(C) such matter does not contain a false rep- from the House of Representatives: resentation stating or implying that Federal for them and more opportunities. Government benefits or services will be affected We know the vast majority of new Resolved, That the bill from the Senate (S. by any purchase or nonpurchase; or’’; jobs that are being created into the 335) entitled ‘‘An Act to amend chapter 30 of (2) in subsection (i) in the first sentence— next century will require some kind of title 39, United States Code, to provide for (A) in the first sentence by striking ‘‘contains postsecondary education, either at- the nonmailability of certain deceptive mat- a seal, insignia, trade or brand name, or any tendance at a technical college, a pri- ter relating to sweepstakes, skill contests, other term or symbol that reasonably could be vate college, or a university. We are facsimile checks, administrative procedures, interpreted or construed as implying any Fed- going to need more and more skills, orders, and civil penalties relating to such eral Government connection, approval or en- matter, and for other purposes’’, do pass with more and more education, if we are to dorsement’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘which the following amendment: reasonably could be interpreted or construed as compete for the jobs of the future. Strike out all after the enacting clause and implying any Federal Government connection, That is why I am so delighted the legis- insert: approval, or endorsement through the use of a lation provides a significant increase SECTION 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS. seal, insignia, reference to the Postmaster Gen- for Pell grants. The table of contents for this Act is as follows: eral, citation to a Federal statute, name of a As you can see, the maximum Pell Sec. 1. Table of contents. Federal agency, department, commission, or pro- grant will be increased in the appro- gram, trade or brand name, or any other term or TITLE I—DECEPTIVE MAIL PREVENTION symbol; or contains any reference to the Post- priations bill. Currently, it is $3,125. AND ENFORCEMENT The President proposed $3,250. The ap- master General or a citation to a Federal statute propriations bill passed by the Senate Sec. 101. Short title. that misrepresents either the identity of the Sec. 102. Restrictions on mailings using mis- mailer or the protection or status afforded such proposed $3,325. Those are good steps. leading references to the United matter by the Federal Government’’; and They will help make college a little bit States Government. (B) in paragraph (2)— more affordable for our Nation’s young Sec. 103. Restrictions on sweepstakes and de- (i) in subparagraph (A) by striking ‘‘and’’ at people; indeed, also for older adults ceptive mailings. the end; who are returning to college because Sec. 104. Postal service orders to prohibit decep- (ii) in subparagraph (B) by striking ‘‘or’’ at they realize they need additional tive mailings. the end and inserting ‘‘and’’; and skills. Sec. 105. Temporary restraining order for decep- (iii) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the tive mailings. following: Once again, it is important we em- ‘‘(C) such matter does not contain a false rep- phasize, the Senate increased spending Sec. 106. Civil penalties and costs. Sec. 107. Administrative subpoenas. resentation stating or implying that Federal for these essential Pell grants beyond Sec. 108. Requirements of promoters of skill con- Government benefits or services will be affected what the President recommended. This tests or sweepstakes mailings. by any contribution or noncontribution; or’’; is a budget of which we can be proud. It Sec. 109. State law not preempted. (3) by redesignating subsections (j) and (k) as does not include every provision each Sec. 110. Technical and conforming amend- subsections (m) and (n), respectively; and of us would like. It reflects hours, ments. (4) by inserting after subsection (i) the fol- Sec. 111. Effective date. lowing: weeks, and months of work. It reflects ‘‘(j)(1) Any matter otherwise legally accept- compromise. That is what the system TITLE II—FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD able in the mails which is described in para- is all about. RETIREMENT PORTABILITY graph (2) is nonmailable matter, shall not be Each of us would write this bill dif- Sec. 201. Short title. carried or delivered by mail, and shall be dis- ferently. Each of us wishes the process Sec. 202. Portability of service credit. posed of as the Postal Service directs.
VerDate 29-OCT-99 03:39 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 6333 E:\CR\FM\G19NO6.041 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S14857 ‘‘(2) Matter described in this paragraph is any statement qualifying, limiting, or explaining the (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ after ‘‘(h),’’ each place it matter that— rules or disclosures in a manner inconsistent appears; and ‘‘(A) constitutes a solicitation for the pur- with such rules or disclosures; (2) by inserting ‘‘, (j), or (k)’’ after ‘‘(i)’’ each chase of or payment for any product or service ‘‘(B)(i) includes entry materials for a skill place it appears. that— contest or a promotion that purports to be a skill SEC. 105. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER FOR ‘‘(i) is provided by the Federal Government; contest; and DECEPTIVE MAILINGS. and ‘‘(ii)(I) does not state all terms and conditions (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3007 of title 39, ‘‘(ii) may be obtained without cost from the of the skill contest, including the rules and United States Code, is amended— Federal Government; and entry procedures for the skill contest; (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as sub- ‘‘(B) does not contain a clear and conspicuous ‘‘(II) does not disclose the sponsor or mailer of section (c); and statement giving notice of the information set the skill contest and the principal place of busi- (2) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the forth in clauses (i) and (ii) of subparagraph ness or an address at which the sponsor or mail- following: (A).’’. er may be contacted; or ‘‘(a)(1) In preparation for or during the pend- ‘‘(III) does not contain skill contest rules that SEC. 103. RESTRICTIONS ON SWEEPSTAKES AND ency of proceedings under section 3005, the DECEPTIVE MAILINGS. state, as applicable— Postal Service may, under the provisions of sec- ‘‘(aa) the number of rounds or levels of the Section 3001 of title 39, United States Code, is tion 409(d), apply to the district court in any contest and the cost to enter each round or amended by inserting after subsection (j) (as district in which mail is sent or received as part level; added by section 102(4)) the following: ‘‘(bb) that subsequent rounds or levels will be of the alleged scheme, device, lottery, gift enter- ‘‘(k)(1) In this subsection— more difficult to solve; prise, sweepstakes, skill contest, or facsimile ‘‘(A) the term ‘clearly and conspicuously dis- ‘‘(cc) the maximum cost to enter all rounds or check or in any district in which the defendant played’ means presented in a manner that is levels; is found, for a temporary restraining order and readily noticeable, readable, and understand- ‘‘(dd) the estimated number or percentage of preliminary injunction under the procedural re- able to the group to whom the applicable matter entrants who may correctly solve the skill con- quirements of rule 65 of the Federal Rules of is disseminated; test or the approximate number or percentage of Civil Procedure. ‘‘(B) the term ‘facsimile check’ means any entrants correctly solving the past 3 skill con- ‘‘(2)(A) Upon a proper showing, the court matter that— tests conducted by the sponsor; shall enter an order which shall— ‘‘(i) is designed to resemble a check or other ‘‘(ee) the identity or description of the quali- ‘‘(i) remain in effect during the pendency of negotiable instrument; but fications of the judges if the contest is judged by the statutory proceedings, any judicial review of ‘‘(ii) is not negotiable; other than the sponsor; such proceedings, or any action to enforce or- ‘‘(C) the term ‘skill contest’ means a puzzle, ‘‘(ff) the method used in judging; ders issued under the proceedings; and game, competition, or other contest in which— ‘‘(gg) the date by which the winner or winners ‘‘(ii) direct the detention by the postmaster, in ‘‘(i) a prize is awarded or offered; will be determined and the date or process by any and all districts, of the defendant’s incom- ‘‘(ii) the outcome depends predominately on which prizes will be awarded; ing mail and outgoing mail, which is the subject the skill of the contestant; and ‘‘(hh) the quantity, estimated retail value, of the proceedings under section 3005. ‘‘(iii) a purchase, payment, or donation is re- and nature of each prize; and ‘‘(B) A proper showing under this paragraph quired or implied to be required to enter the con- ‘‘(ii) the schedule of any payments made over shall require proof of a likelihood of success on test; and time; or the merits of the proceedings under section 3005. ‘‘(D) the term ‘sweepstakes’ means a game of ‘‘(C) includes any facsimile check that does ‘‘(3) Mail detained under paragraph (2) chance for which no consideration is required to not contain a statement on the check itself that shall— enter. such check is not a negotiable instrument and ‘‘(A) be made available at the post office of ‘‘(2) Except as provided in paragraph (4), any has no cash value. mailing or delivery for examination by the de- matter otherwise legally acceptable in the mails ‘‘(4) Matter that appears in a magazine, news- fendant in the presence of a postal employee; which is described in paragraph (3) is non- paper, or other periodical shall be exempt from and mailable matter, shall not be carried or delivered paragraph (2) if such matter— ‘‘(B) be delivered as addressed if such mail is ‘‘(A) is not directed to a named individual; or not clearly shown to be the subject of pro- by mail, and shall be disposed of as the Postal ‘‘(B) does not include an opportunity to make Service directs. ceedings under section 3005. a payment or order a product or service. ‘‘(4) No finding of the defendant’s intent to ‘‘(3) Matter described in this paragraph is any ‘‘(5) Any statement, notice, or disclaimer re- make a false representation or to conduct a lot- matter that— quired under paragraph (3) shall be clearly and tery is required to support the issuance of an ‘‘(A)(i) includes entry materials for a sweep- conspicuously displayed. Any statement, notice, order under this section. stakes or a promotion that purports to be a or disclaimer required under subclause (I) or (II) ‘‘(b) If any order is issued under subsection sweepstakes; and of paragraph (3)(A)(ii) shall be displayed more (a) and the proceedings under section 3005 are ‘‘(ii)(I) does not contain a statement that dis- conspicuously than would otherwise be required concluded with the issuance of an order under closes in the mailing, in the rules, and on the under the preceding sentence. order or entry form, that no purchase is nec- ‘‘(6) In the enforcement of paragraph (3), the that section, any judicial review of the matter essary to enter such sweepstakes; Postal Service shall consider all of the materials shall be in the district in which the order under ‘‘(II) does not contain a statement that dis- included in the mailing and the material and subsection (a) was issued.’’. (b) REPEAL.— closes in the mailing, in the rules, and on the language on and visible through the envelope or (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 3006 of title 39, order or entry form, that a purchase will not im- outside cover or wrapper in which those mate- United States Code, and the item relating to prove an individual’s chances of winning with rials are mailed. such entry; ‘‘(l)(1) Any person who uses the mails for any such section in the table of sections for chapter ‘‘(III) does not state all terms and conditions matter to which subsection (h), (i), (j), or (k) ap- 30 of such title are repealed. of the sweepstakes promotion, including the plies shall adopt reasonable practices and proce- (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—(A) Section rules and entry procedures for the sweepstakes; dures to prevent the mailing of such matter to 3005(c) of title 39, United States Code, is amend- ‘‘(IV) does not disclose the sponsor or mailer any person who, personally or through a con- ed by striking ‘‘section and section 3006 of this of such matter and the principal place of busi- servator, guardian, or individual with power of title,’’ and inserting ‘‘section,’’. (B) Section 3011(e) of title 39, United States ness or an address at which the sponsor or mail- attorney— er may be contacted; ‘‘(A) submits to the mailer of such matter a Code, is amended by striking ‘‘3006, 3007,’’ and ‘‘(V) does not contain sweepstakes rules that written request that such matter should not be inserting ‘‘3007’’. state— mailed to such person; or SEC. 106. CIVIL PENALTIES AND COSTS. ‘‘(aa) the estimated odds of winning each ‘‘(B)(i) submits such a written request to the Section 3012 of title 39, United States Code, is prize; attorney general of the appropriate State (or amended— ‘‘(bb) the quantity, estimated retail value, and any State government officer who transmits the (1) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘$10,000 for nature of each prize; and request to that attorney general); and each day that such person engages in conduct ‘‘(cc) the schedule of any payments made over ‘‘(ii) that attorney general transmits such re- described by paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of this time; quest to the mailer. subsection.’’ and inserting ‘‘$50,000 for each ‘‘(VI) represents that individuals not pur- ‘‘(2) Any person who mails matter to which mailing of less than 50,000 pieces; $100,000 for chasing products or services may be disqualified subsection (h), (i), (j), or (k) applies shall main- each mailing of 50,000 to 100,000 pieces; with an from receiving future sweepstakes mailings; tain or cause to be maintained a record of all re- additional $10,000 for each additional 10,000 ‘‘(VII) requires that a sweepstakes entry be quests made under paragraph (1). The records pieces above 100,000, not to exceed $2,000,000.’’; accompanied by an order or payment for a prod- shall be maintained in a form to permit the sup- (2) in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (b) uct or service previously ordered; pression of an applicable name at the applicable by inserting after ‘‘of subsection (a)’’ the fol- ‘‘(VIII) represents that an individual is a win- address for a 5-year period beginning on the lowing: ‘‘, (c), or (d)’’; ner of a prize unless that individual has won date the written request under paragraph (1) is (3) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d), as such prize; or submitted to the mailer.’’. subsections (e) and (f), respectively; and ‘‘(IX) contains a representation that con- SEC. 104. POSTAL SERVICE ORDERS TO PROHIBIT (4) by inserting after subsection (b) the fol- tradicts, or is inconsistent with sweepstakes DECEPTIVE MAILINGS. lowing: rules or any other disclosure required to be Section 3005(a) of title 39, United States Code, ‘‘(c)(1) In any proceeding in which the Postal made under this subsection, including any is amended— Service may issue an order under section
VerDate 29-OCT-99 03:39 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 6333 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.003 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 S14858 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 19, 1999 3005(a), the Postal Service may in lieu of that ‘‘(A) delivering a duly executed copy thereof ‘‘§ 3017. Nonmailable skill contests or sweep- order or as part of that order assess civil pen- to any partner, executive officer, managing stakes matter; notification to prohibit mail- alties in an amount not to exceed $25,000 for agent, or general agent thereof, or to any agent ings each mailing of less than 50,000 pieces; $50,000 thereof authorized by appointment or by law to ‘‘(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— for each mailing of 50,000 to 100,000 pieces; with receive service of process on behalf of such part- ‘‘(1) the term ‘promoter’ means any person an additional $5,000 for each additional 10,000 nership, corporation, association, or entity; who— pieces above 100,000, not to exceed $1,000,000. ‘‘(B) delivering a duly executed copy thereof ‘‘(A) originates and mails any skill contest or ‘‘(2) In any proceeding in which the Postal to the principal office or place of business of the sweepstakes, except for any matter described in Service assesses penalties under this subsection partnership, corporation, association, or entity; section 3001(k)(4); or the Postal Service shall determine the civil pen- or ‘‘(B) originates and causes to be mailed any alty taking into account the nature, cir- ‘‘(C) depositing such copy in the United States skill contest or sweepstakes, except for any mat- cumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation mails, by registered or certified mail, return re- ter described in section 3001(k)(4); or violations of section 3005(a), and with respect ceipt requested, duly addressed to such partner- ‘‘(2) the term ‘removal request’ means a re- to the violator, the ability to pay the penalty, ship, corporation, association, or entity at its quest stating that an individual elects to have the effect of the penalty on the ability of the vi- principal office or place of business. the name and address of such individual ex- olator to conduct lawful business, any history of ERVICE ON NATURAL PERSONS.—Service ‘‘(4) S cluded from any list used by a promoter for prior violations of such section, the degree of of any subpoena may be made upon any natural mailing skill contests or sweepstakes; culpability and other such matters as justice person by— ‘‘(3) the terms ‘skill contest’, ‘sweepstakes’, may require. ‘‘(A) delivering a duly executed copy to the and ‘clearly and conspicuously displayed’ have ‘‘(d) Any person who violates section 3001(l) person to be served; or the same meanings as given them in section shall be liable to the United States for a civil ‘‘(B) depositing such copy in the United 3001(k); and penalty not to exceed $10,000 for each mailing to States mails, by registered or certified mail, re- ‘‘(4) the term ‘duly authorized person’, as an individual.’’. turn receipt requested, duly addressed to such used in connection with an individual, means a SEC. 107. ADMINISTRATIVE SUBPOENAS. person at his residence or principal office or conservator or guardian of, or person granted (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 30 of title 39, place of business. power of attorney by, such individual. ‘‘(5) VERIFIED RETURN.—A verified return by United States Code, is amended by adding at the ‘‘(b) NONMAILABLE MATTER.— the individual serving any such subpoena set- end the following: ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Matter otherwise legally ‘‘§ 3016. Administrative subpoenas ting forth the manner of such service shall be acceptable in the mails described in paragraph proof of such service. In the case of service by ‘‘(a) SUBPOENA AUTHORITY.— (2)— registered or certified mail, such return shall be ‘‘(1) INVESTIGATIONS.— ‘‘(A) is nonmailable matter; accompanied by the return post office receipt of ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In any investigation con- ‘‘(B) shall not be carried or delivered by mail; delivery of such subpoena. ducted under section 3005(a), the Postmaster and ‘‘(c) ENFORCEMENT.— General may require by subpoena the produc- ‘‘(C) shall be disposed of as the Postal Service ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Whenever any person, tion of any records (including books, papers, directs. partnership, corporation, association, or entity documents, and other tangible things which ‘‘(2) NONMAILABLE MATTER DESCRIBED.—Mat- fails to comply with any subpoena duly served constitute or contain evidence) which the Post- ter described in this paragraph is any matter upon him, the Postmaster General may request master General considers relevant or material to that— that the Attorney General seek enforcement of such investigation. ‘‘(A) is a skill contest or sweepstakes, except the subpoena in the district court of the United ‘‘(B) CONDITION.—No subpoena shall be issued for any matter described in section 3001(k)(4); States for any judicial district in which such under this paragraph except in accordance with and person resides, is found, or transacts business, procedures, established by the Postal Service, re- ‘‘(B)(i) is addressed to an individual who and serve upon such person a petition for an quiring that— made an election to be excluded from lists under order of such court for the enforcement of this ‘‘(i) a specific case, with an individual or enti- subsection (d); or section. ty identified as the subject, be opened before a ‘‘(ii) does not comply with subsection (c)(1). ‘‘(2) JURISDICTION.—Whenever any petition is subpoena is requested; ‘‘(c) REQUIREMENTS OF PROMOTERS.— ‘‘(ii) appropriate supervisory and legal review filed in any district court of the United States ‘‘(1) NOTICE TO INDIVIDUALS.—Any promoter of a subpoena request be performed; and under this section, such court shall have juris- who mails a skill contest or sweepstakes shall ‘‘(iii) delegation of subpoena approval author- diction to hear and determine the matter so pre- provide with each mailing a statement that— ity be limited to the Postal Service’s General sented, and to enter such order or orders as may ‘‘(A) is clearly and conspicuously displayed; Counsel or a Deputy General Counsel. be required to carry into effect the provisions of ‘‘(B) includes the address or toll-free tele- this section. Any final order entered shall be ‘‘(2) STATUTORY PROCEEDINGS.—In any statu- phone number of the notification system estab- tory proceeding conducted under section subject to appeal under section 1291 of title 28, lished under paragraph (2); and 3005(a), the Judicial Officer may require by sub- United States Code. Any disobedience of any ‘‘(C) states that the notification system may poena the attendance and testimony of wit- final order entered under this section by any be used to prohibit the mailing of all skill con- nesses and the production of any records (in- court may be punished as contempt. tests or sweepstakes by that promoter to such in- cluding books, papers, documents, and other ‘‘(d) DISCLOSURE.—Any documentary material dividual. tangible things which constitute or contain evi- provided pursuant to any subpoena issued ‘‘(2) NOTIFICATION SYSTEM.—Any promoter dence) which the Judicial Officer considers rel- under this section shall be exempt from disclo- that mails or causes to be mailed a skill contest evant or material to such proceeding. sure under section 552 of title 5, United States or sweepstakes shall establish and maintain a ‘‘(3) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in Code.’’. notification system that provides for any indi- paragraph (2) shall be considered to apply in (b) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 120 days vidual (or other duly authorized person) to no- any circumstance to which paragraph (1) ap- after the date of the enactment of this section, tify the system of the individual’s election to plies. the Postal Service shall promulgate regulations have the name and address of the individual ex- ‘‘(b) SERVICE.— setting out the procedures the Postal Service cluded from all lists of names and addresses ‘‘(1) SERVICE WITHIN THE UNITED STATES.—A will use to implement the amendment made by used by that promoter to mail any skill contest subpoena issued under this section may be subsection (a). or sweepstakes. served by a person designated under section 3061 (c) SEMIANNUAL REPORTS.—Section 3013 of ‘‘(d) ELECTION TO BE EXCLUDED FROM of title 18 at any place within the territorial ju- title 39, United States Code, is amended by strik- LISTS.— risdiction of any court of the United States. ing ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph (4), by redes- ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—An individual (or other ‘‘(2) FOREIGN SERVICE.—Any such subpoena ignating paragraph (5) as paragraph (6), and by duly authorized person) may elect to exclude the may be served upon any person who is not to be inserting after paragraph (4) the following: name and address of that individual from all found within the territorial jurisdiction of any ‘‘(5) the number of cases in which the author- lists of names and addresses used by a promoter court of the United States, in such manner as ity described in section 3016 was used, and a of skill contests or sweepstakes by submitting a the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure prescribe comprehensive statement describing how that removal request to the notification system estab- for service in a foreign country. To the extent authority was used in each of those cases; and’’. lished under subsection (c). that the courts of the United States may assert (d) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMEND- ‘‘(2) RESPONSE AFTER SUBMITTING REMOVAL jurisdiction over such person consistent with MENT.—The table of sections for chapter 30 of REQUEST TO THE NOTIFICATION SYSTEM.—Not due process, the United States District Court for title 39, United States Code, is amended by add- later than 60 calendar days after a promoter re- the District of Columbia shall have the same ju- ing at the end the following: ceives a removal request pursuant to an election risdiction to take any action respecting compli- ‘‘3016. Administrative subpoenas.’’. under paragraph (1), the promoter shall exclude ance with this section by such person that such SEC. 108. REQUIREMENTS OF PROMOTERS OF the individual’s name and address from all lists court would have if such person were personally SKILL CONTESTS OR SWEEPSTAKES of names and addresses used by that promoter to within the jurisdiction of such court. MAILINGS. select recipients for any skill contest or sweep- ‘‘(3) SERVICE ON BUSINESS PERSONS.—Service (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 30 of title 39, stakes. of any such subpoena may be made upon a United States Code (as amended by section 107) ‘‘(3) EFFECTIVENESS OF ELECTION.—An elec- partnership, corporation, association, or other is amended by adding after section 3016 the fol- tion under paragraph (1) shall remain in effect, legal entity by— lowing: unless an individual (or other duly authorized
VerDate 29-OCT-99 03:39 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 6333 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.003 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S14859 person) notifies the promoter in writing that SEC. 109. STATE LAW NOT PREEMPTED. section, any military service, and any service such individual— (a) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in the provisions of performed in the employ of a Federal Reserve ‘‘(A) has changed the election; and this title (including the amendments made by Bank) that was creditable under the Bank Plan ‘‘(B) elects to receive skill contest or sweep- this title) or in the regulations promulgated (as defined in subsection (i)), if the employee stakes mailings from that promoter. under such provisions shall be construed to pre- waives credit for such service under the Bank ‘‘(e) PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION.— empt any provision of State or local law that im- Plan and makes a payment to the Fund equal to ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—An individual who receives poses more restrictive requirements, regulations, the amount that would have been deducted from one or more mailings in violation of subsection damages, costs, or penalties. No determination pay under section 8422(a) had the employee been (d) may, if otherwise permitted by the laws or by the Postal Service that any particular piece subject to this chapter during such period of rules of court of a State, bring in an appropriate of mail or class of mail is in compliance with service (together with interest on such amount court of that State— such provisions of this title shall be construed to computed under paragraphs (2) and (3) of sec- ‘‘(A) an action to enjoin such violation; preempt any provision of State or local law. tion 8334(e)). ‘‘(B) an action to recover for actual monetary (b) EFFECT ON STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS.— Paragraph (5) shall not apply in the case of any loss from such a violation, or to receive $500 in Nothing contained in this section shall be con- employee as to whom subsection (g) (or, to the damages for each such violation, whichever is strued to prohibit an authorized State official extent subchapter III of chapter 83 is involved, greater; or from proceeding in State court on the basis of section 8332(n)) otherwise applies.’’. ‘‘(C) both such actions. (2) BANK PLAN DEFINED.—Section 8411 of title It shall be an affirmative defense in any action an alleged violation of any general civil or 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at brought under this subsection that the defend- criminal statute of such State or any specific the end the following: ant has established and implemented, with due civil or criminal statute of such State. ‘‘(i) For purposes of subsection (b)(5), the term care, reasonable practices and procedures to ef- SEC. 110. TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMEND- ‘Bank Plan’ means the benefit structure in fectively prevent mailings in violation of sub- MENTS. which employees of the Board of Governors of section (d). If the court finds that the defendant (a) REFERENCES TO REPEALED PROVISIONS.— the Federal Reserve System appointed on or willfully or knowingly violated subsection (d), Section 3001(a) of title 39, United States Code, is after January 1, 1984, participate, which benefit the court may, in its discretion, increase the amended by striking ‘‘1714,’’ and ‘‘1718,’’. structure is a component of the Retirement Plan amount of the award to an amount equal to not (b) CONFORMANCE WITH INSPECTOR GENERAL for Employees of the Federal Reserve System, es- more than 3 times the amount available under ACT OF 1978.— tablished under section 10 of the Federal Re- subparagraph (B). (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 3013 of title 39, serve Act (and any redesignated or successor ‘‘(2) ACTION ALLOWABLE BASED ON OTHER SUF- United States Code, is amended— version of such benefit structure, if so identified FICIENT NOTICE.—A mailing sent in violation of (A) by striking ‘‘Board’’ each place it appears section 3001(l) shall be actionable under this and inserting ‘‘Inspector General’’; in writing by the Board of Governors of the Fed- subsection, but only if such an action would not (B) in the third sentence by striking ‘‘Each eral Reserve System for purposes of this chap- also be available under paragraph (1) (as a vio- such report shall be submitted within sixty days ter).’’. (b) EXCLUSION FROM CHAPTER 84.— lation of subsection (d)) based on the same mail- after the close of the reporting period involved’’ (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section ing. and inserting ‘‘Each such report shall be sub- 8402(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended ‘‘(f) PROMOTER NONLIABILITY.—A promoter mitted within 1 month (or such shorter length of shall not be subject to civil liability for the ex- time as the Inspector General may specify) after by striking the matter before subparagraph (B) clusion of an individual’s name or address from the close of the reporting period involved’’; and and inserting the following: ‘‘(2)(A) any employee or Member who has sep- any list maintained by that promoter for mailing (C) by striking the last sentence and inserting arated from the service after— skill contests or sweepstakes, if— the following: ‘‘(1) a removal request is received by the pro- ‘‘The information in a report submitted under ‘‘(i) having been subject to— ‘‘(I) subchapter III of chapter 83 of this title; moter’s notification system; and this section to the Inspector General with re- ‘‘(II) subchapter I of chapter 8 of title I of the ‘‘(2) the promoter has a good faith belief that spect to a reporting period shall be included as Foreign Service Act of 1980; or the request is from— part of the semiannual report prepared by the ‘‘(III) the benefit structure for employees of ‘‘(A) the individual whose name and address Inspector General under section 5 of the Inspec- the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve is to be excluded; or tor General Act of 1978 for the same reporting System appointed before January 1, 1984, that is ‘‘(B) another duly authorized person. period. Nothing in this section shall be consid- a component of the Retirement Plan for Employ- ‘‘(g) PROHIBITION ON COMMERCIAL USE OF ered to permit or require that any report by the ees of the Federal Reserve System, established LISTS.— Postmaster General under this section include under section 10 of the Federal Reserve Act; and ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.— any information relating to activities of the In- ‘‘(ii) having completed— ‘‘(A) PROHIBITION.—No person may provide spector General.’’. any information (including the sale or rental of ‘‘(I) at least 5 years of civilian service cred- (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This subsection shall itable under subchapter III of chapter 83 of this any name or address) derived from a list de- take effect on the date of the enactment of this scribed in subparagraph (B) to another person title; Act, and the amendments made by this sub- ‘‘(II) at least 5 years of civilian service cred- for commercial use. section shall apply with respect to semiannual ‘‘(B) LISTS.—A list referred to under subpara- itable under subchapter I of chapter 8 of title I reporting periods beginning on or after such graph (A) is any list of names and addresses (or of the Foreign Service Act of 1980; or date of enactment. other related information) compiled from indi- ‘‘(III) at least 5 years of civilian service (other (3) SAVINGS PROVISION.—For purposes of any viduals who exercise an election under sub- than any service performed in the employ of a semiannual reporting period preceding the first section (d). Federal Reserve Bank) creditable under the ben- semiannual reporting period referred to in para- ‘‘(2) CIVIL PENALTY.—Any person who violates efit structure for employees of the Board of Gov- graph (2), the provisions of title 39, United paragraph (1) shall be assessed a civil penalty ernors of the Federal Reserve System appointed States Code, shall continue to apply as if the by the Postal Service not to exceed $2,000,000 per before January 1, 1984, that is a component of amendments made by this subsection had not violation. the Retirement Plan for Employees of the Fed- been enacted. ‘‘(h) CIVIL PENALTIES.— eral Reserve System, established under section ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Any promoter— SEC. 111. EFFECTIVE DATE. 10 of the Federal Reserve Act, ‘‘(A) who recklessly mails nonmailable matter Except as provided in section 108 or 110(b), determined without regard to any deposit or re- in violation of subsection (b) shall be liable to this title shall take effect 120 days after the date deposit requirement under either such sub- the United States in an amount of $10,000 per of the enactment of this Act. chapter or under such benefit structure, or any violation for each mailing to an individual of TITLE II—FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD requirement that the individual become subject nonmailable matter; or RETIREMENT PORTABILITY to either such subchapter or to such benefit ‘‘(B) who fails to comply with the require- structure after performing the service involved; SEC. 201. SHORT TITLE. ments of subsection (c)(2) shall be liable to the or’’. This title may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Reserve United States. (2) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (d) of section 8402 ‘‘(2) ENFORCEMENT.—The Postal Service shall, Board Retirement Portability Act’’. of title 5, United States Code, is amended to in accordance with the same procedures as set SEC. 202. PORTABILITY OF SERVICE CREDIT. read as follows: forth in section 3012(b), provide for the assess- (a) CREDITABLE SERVICE.— ‘‘(d) Paragraph (2) of subsection (b) shall not ment of civil penalties under this section.’’. (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 8411(b) of title 5, apply to an individual who— (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMEND- United States Code, is amended— ‘‘(1) becomes subject to— MENTS.—The table of sections for chapter 30 of (A) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph ‘‘(A) subchapter II of chapter 8 of title I of the title 39, United States Code, is amended by add- (3); Foreign Service Act of 1980 (relating to the For- ing after the item relating to section 3016 the fol- (B) in paragraph (4)— eign Service Pension System) pursuant to an lowing: (i) by striking ‘‘of the preceding provisions’’ election; or ‘‘3017. Nonmailable skill contests or sweepstakes and inserting ‘‘other paragraph’’; and ‘‘(B) the benefit structure in which employees matter; notification to prohibit (ii) by striking the period at the end and in- of the Board of Governors of the Federal Re- mailings.’’. serting ‘‘; and’’; and serve System appointed on or after January 1, (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take (C) by adding at the end the following: 1984, participate, which benefit structure is a effect 1 year after the date of the enactment of ‘‘(5) a period of service (other than any serv- component of the Retirement Plan for Employ- this Act. ice under any other paragraph of this sub- ees of the Federal Reserve System, established
VerDate 29-OCT-99 03:39 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 6333 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.003 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 S14860 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 19, 1999 under section 10 of the Federal Reserve Act (and ‘‘(2) the retirement system under subchapter sible. I particularly want to acknowl- any redesignated or successor version of such III of chapter 83; and edge the contributions of Senator ‘‘(3) any other retirement system under which benefit structure, if so identified in writing by LEVIN of Michigan, the ranking minor- individuals may contribute to the Thrift Savings the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve ity member of the permanent Sub- System for purposes of this chapter); and Fund through withholdings from pay.’’. ‘‘(2) subsequently enters a position in which, (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sec- committee on Investigations, and the but for paragraph (2) of subsection (b), such in- tions for chapter 84 of title 5, United States chief cosponsor of this important legis- dividual would be subject to this chapter.’’. Code, is amended by inserting before the item re- lation. In addition, Senator COCHRAN (c) PROVISIONS RELATING TO CERTAIN FORMER lating to section 8432 the following: and Senator EDWARDS were real leaders EMPLOYEES.—A former employee of the Board of ‘‘8431. Certain transfers to be treated as a sepa- in this effort and contributed greatly Governors of the Federal Reserve System who— ration.’’. to the legislation. (1) has at least 5 years of civilian service (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Subsection There were many other Senators, as (other than any service performed in the employ (b) of section 8351 of title 5, United States Code, well, who cosponsored this measure. In of a Federal Reserve Bank) creditable under the is amended by redesignating paragraph (11) as benefit structure for employees of the Board of particular, I want to recognize the con- paragraph (8), and by adding at the end the fol- tributions of several members of the Governors of the Federal Reserve System ap- lowing: pointed before January 1, 1984, that is a compo- ‘‘(9) For the purpose of this section, separa- Committee on Governmental Affairs, nent of the Retirement Plan for Employees of tion from Government employment includes a including Chairman THOMPSON, Sen- the Federal Reserve System, established under transfer described in section 8431.’’. ators LIEBERMAN, STEVENS, DURBIN, section 10 of the Federal Reserve Act; (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made DOMENICI, AKAKA, and SPECTER. They (2) was subsequently employed subject to the by this section shall apply with respect to trans- were early cosponsors of this legisla- benefit structure in which employees of the fers occurring before, on, or after the date of the tion. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Sys- enactment of this Act, except that, for purposes tem appointed on or after January 1, 1984, par- Senator CAMPBELL has also played an of applying such amendments with respect to important role. He first introduced leg- ticipate, which benefit structure is a component any transfer occurring before such date of en- of the Retirement Plan for Employees of the actment, the date of such transfer shall be con- islation to curb some of the deceptive Federal Reserve System, established under sec- sidered to be the date of the enactment of this practices of sweepstakes companies. tion 10 of the Federal Reserve Act (and any re- Act. The Executive Director (within the mean- In addition, there are several Mem- designated or successor version of such benefit ing of section 8401(13) of title 5, United States bers of the House of Representatives structure, if so identified in writing by the Code) may prescribe any regulations necessary who have also worked very hard to Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Sys- to carry out this subsection. bring to about passage today. They in- tem for purposes of chapter 84 of title 5, United SEC. 204. CLARIFYING AMENDMENTS. clude Congressman JOHN MCHUGH, who States Code); and (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (f) of section 3304 (3) after service described in paragraph (2), is chairman of the Subcommittee on of title 5, United States Code, as added by sec- the Postal Service; Congressman becomes subject to and thereafter entitled to tion 2 of Public Law 105–339, is amended— FATTAH, who is the ranking minority benefits under chapter 84 of title 5, United (1) by striking paragraph (4); States Code, (2) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as member of the subcommittee; Con- shall, for purposes of section 302 of the Federal paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; and gressman LOBIONDO, Congressman Employees’ Retirement System Act of 1986 (100 (3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the fol- ROGAN, Congressman MCCOLLUM, Con- Stat. 601; 5 U.S.C. 8331 note) be considered to lowing: gressman and Chairman DAN BURTON, have become subject to chapter 84 of title 5, ‘‘(2) If selected, a preference eligible or vet- and Congressman HENRY WAXMAN. All United States Code, pursuant to an election eran described in paragraph (1) shall acquire under section 301 of such Act. of them worked very hard to forge competitive status and shall receive a career or workable legislation that is going to (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.— career-conditional appointment, as appro- (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to succeeding provi- priate.’’. make a real difference. sions of this subsection, this section and the (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made I also want to express my thanks to amendments made by this section shall take ef- by subsection (a) shall take effect as if enacted the members of my staff who worked fect on the date of the enactment of this Act. on October 31, 1998. very hard on this. On the sub- (2) PROVISIONS RELATING TO CREDITABILITY TITLE III—AMENDMENT TO THE FEDERAL committee staff, Lee Blalack and Kirk AND CERTAIN FORMER EMPLOYEES.—The amend- PROPERTY AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERV- Walder were instrumental, and on my ments made by subsection (a) and the provisions ICES ACT OF 1949 of subsection (c) shall apply only to individuals personal staff, Michael Bopp, my legis- who separate from service subject to chapter 84 SEC. 301. TRANSFER OF CERTAIN PROPERTY TO lative director—all of them worked of title 5, United States Code, on or after the STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS. very hard. date of the enactment of this Act. Section 203(p)(1)(B)(ii) of the Federal Prop- The requirements in this legislation (3) PROVISIONS RELATING TO EXCLUSION FROM erty and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (40 will reduce the deceptive techniques U.S.C. 484(p)(1)(B)(ii)) is amended by striking CHAPTER.—The amendments made by subsection that have caused countless Americans, (b) shall not apply to any former employee of ‘‘December 31, 1999.’’ and inserting ‘‘July 31, 2000. During the period beginning January 1, hundreds of thousands of Americans, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve many of them elderly, to purchase System who, subsequent to his or her last period 2000, and ending July 31, 2000, the Adminis- of service as an employee of the Board of Gov- trator may not convey any property under sub- products they do not need nor do they ernors of the Federal Reserve System and prior paragraph (A), but may accept, consider, and want. Once this legislation takes ef- to the date of the enactment of this Act, became approve applications for transfer of property fect, mailings will be required to make subject to subchapter III of chapter 83 or chap- under that subparagraph.’’. crystal clear to consumers that no pur- ter 84 of title 5, United States Code, under the Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I ask chase is necessary to enter a sweep- law in effect at the time of the individual’s ap- unanimous consent that the Senate stakes and that making a purchase will pointment. agree to the amendment of the House. not improve your chances of winning. SEC. 203. CERTAIN TRANSFERS TO BE TREATED The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without That is the primary misconception AS A SEPARATION FROM SERVICE objection, it is so ordered. our investigation identified. Too many FOR PURPOSES OF THE THRIFT SAV- INGS PLAN. Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I am consumers believe if they make a pur- (a) AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 84 OF TITLE 5, delighted the Senate has now sent S. chase, somehow they will improve UNITED STATES CODE.— 335, the Deceptive Mail Prevention and their chances of winning, but nothing (1) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter III of chapter 84 Enforcement Act that I introduced to could be further from the truth. It is of title 5, United States Code, is amended by in- curb deceptive mailings, to the Presi- easy to see why they have that mis- serting before section 8432 the following: dent for his signature. conception because that is exactly the ‘‘§ 8431. Certain transfers to be treated as a The Senate originally passed this leg- impression these deceptive mailings separation islation by a vote of 93–0 on August 2. are intended to leave. ‘‘(a) For purposes of this subchapter, separa- It will impose new disclosure require- In addition, the legislation will pro- tion from Government employment includes a ments on sweepstakes mailings to pro- hibit sweepstakes companies from tell- transfer from a position that is subject to one of tect consumers. It will also provide ing people they are a winner unless the retirement systems described in subsection new authority to the Postal Service to (b) to a position that is not subject to any of they really have won a prize. them. take enforcement action against those Enactment of this legislation con- ‘‘(b) The retirement systems described in this companies sending deceptive mailings. cludes a year-long investigation by the subsection are— I want to thank several people whose Permanent Subcommittee on Inves- ‘‘(1) the retirement system under this chapter; hard work has made passage today pos- tigations, which I chair. Prompted by
VerDate 29-OCT-99 03:39 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.003 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S14861 complaints from my constituents in bold print, it proclaims: ‘‘Our sweep- fine print that declared, ‘‘If you have Maine, I began an investigation to ex- stakes results are now final.’’ ‘‘Ms. the winning number.’’ Unless the con- amine deceptive mailings. Hearings be- Susan M. Collins has won a cash prize testant reads and understands this fine fore the subcommittee demonstrated of $833,337.’’ ‘‘A bank check for $833,337 print, the mailing leaves the unmistak- that the deceptive techniques of major is on its way to’’—my address—‘‘in able impression that the recipient and sweepstakes companies were mis- Bangor.’’ It further warns that I will one other person have the winning leading thousands of Americans into forfeit the entire amount if I refuse to number for the $11 million prize. making purchases of products. Further respond to this notice. On the back it Mr. President, the bill adopted by the investigation into the activities of the says, again, ‘‘A bank check for $833,337 Senate would curb these problems by, smaller sweepstakes companies, the in cash will be sent to you by certified for the first time, establishing federal ones that I call the ‘‘stealth compa- mail if you respond now.’’ standards for a variety of promotional nies,’’ showed that their practices were I have a feeling you will not be sur- mailings, including sweepstakes mail- even more deceptive. In some cases, prised to learn that I am not the big ings. Such mailings must clearly and they bordered on outright fraud. winner. But if I relied on the informa- conspicuously display several impor- The subcommittee heard heart- tion in this mailing, it would be easy tant disclosures, including statements breaking testimony that deceptive to see why many people would be de- that no purchase is necessary to enter sweepstakes can induce trusting con- ceived into thinking they have, indeed, the contest and that a purchase will sumers to buy thousands of dollars of won the grand prize. not improve your chances of winning; unnecessary and unwanted merchan- Now, in the small print—not in the the odds of winning; the value and na- dise. One example was a magazine sub- bold type—but in the small print it ex- ture of each prize; and the name and address of the sponsor. Sweepstakes scription extending to the year 2018 plains that I have to have the winning mailings would also be required to in- that one witness testified that her 82- number to really win the prize. clude all the rules and entry proce- year-old father-in-law purchased be- That message is overwhelmed by the bold proclamations telling me I am a dures for the sweepstakes. cause of sweepstakes promotions. This legislation also addresses an- We found that our senior citizens are winner. Of course, in case I am tempted other problem consumers experience in particularly vulnerable to these kinds not to enter, there is what appears to be a personal note that says, ‘‘Please dealing with sweepstakes companies. of deceptive mailings. They are a trust- The Subcommittee heard from many don’t say no now,’’ and implores me to ing generation. Many seniors tend to individuals who found it difficult to enter and to buy the product offered. believe what they read, particularly if have their name or a parent’s name re- This is not unusual. This is typical of it is endorsed by a trusted spokesman, moved from the mailing lists of sweep- the kinds of deceptive mailings that comes from a well-known company, or stakes companies, or who were told are all too common and that flood the involves a mailing that has been de- that the name removal process might mailboxes of American consumers with signed to appear as if it is from the take as long as six months. To address more than a billion pieces of mail a Federal Government. this problem, this legislation includes Family members told us of loved year. a section developed by Senator ED- ones who were so convinced that they You shouldn’t have to be a lawyer, WARDS that would require companies you shouldn’t have to have a magni- had won a sweepstakes that they re- sending sweepstakes or skill contests fying glass, to figure out the rules of fused to leave their home for fear they to establish a system allowing con- the game and the odds of winning. Our would miss the Prize Patrol. One con- sumers to call or write to have their legislation will make a real difference stituent of mine actually canceled names removed from the companies’ by requiring honest disclosures, by pre- needed surgery because she did not mailing lists. want to miss Ed McMahon’s visit. venting sweepstakes companies from The House made several modifica- Sadly, of course, Ed McMahon never telling people they have won when they tions to this section of the bill, includ- showed up. have not, and, most importantly, by ing extending the time from 35 days to We found cases of seniors enticed by making crystal clear to consumers 60 days by which companies must re- the bold promises of sweepstakes who that you don’t have to make a pur- move names of consumers who do not spent their Social Security checks, chase to win and that making a pur- wish to receive future sweepstakes or squandered their life’s savings, and chase will not increase your chances of skill contest mailings. Non-profit mail- even borrowed money to buy unwanted winning. ers who use sweepstakes contests re- magazines and other merchandise. Mr. President, as I said, I am pleased quested a time limit of longer than 35 I will never forget the testimony of that the Senate is now poised to send days, arguing that their limited re- one man who broke down in tears as he my legislation to curb deceptive mail- sources might not allow the establish- recounted how the sweepstakes compa- ings to the President for his signature. ment of a system to quickly remove nies had deceived him into purchasing As I have described to my colleagues names. The 60-day limit in the bill, $15,000 worth of products in an effort to previously, you only have to look at however, should not be used by any win the big prize. some of these sweepstakes mailings to company to continue to inundate with The loss suffered by consumers can- understand why. For example, one more mailings those consumers who not be measured in dollars alone. As mailing by Publisher’s Clearing House, have asked to be removed from sweep- one elderly gentleman put it: which is famous for its Prize Patrol, stakes mailing lists. Accordingly, com- My wife has finally come to realize that tells the consumer to ‘‘Open Your Door panies should make every effort to re- she has been duped by the sweepstakes so- To $31 Million on January 31.’’ This move names as quickly as possible. licitations for all these years. Although the mailing suggests to the reader that his The House also added provisions to financial train is now halted, the loss of her or her past purchases are paying off. allow consumers to bring a private dignity is incalculable. Specifically, the mailing states: ‘‘You right of action in state court if they re- Unfortunately, these are not isolated see, your recent order and entry has ceive a mailing after previously re- examples. According to a survey com- proven to us that you’re indeed one of questing to be removed from the mail- missioned by the AARP, 40 percent of our loyal friends and a savvy sweep- ing list of a skill contest or sweep- seniors surveyed believe there is a con- stakes player. And now I’m pleased to stakes promoter. Sweepstakes pro- nection between purchasing and win- tell you that you’ve passed our selec- moters will have an affirmative defense ning. It is easy to see why consumers tion criteria to receive this special in- if they have established and imple- believe they have already won or that vitation.’’ mented, with due care, reasonable they will win if they just purchase Another mailing from American practices and procedures to effectively something as a result of these mail- Family Publishers stated, ‘‘It’s Down prevent mailings that would violate ings. to a 2 person race for $11,000,000—You the section on name removal. I would like to show you, Mr. Presi- And One Other Person In Georgia Were The notification system in the bill dent, and read from a sweepstakes Issued the Winning Number . . . Who- passed by the Senate, and modified by mailing that I received last week at my ever Returns It First Wins It All!’’ the House, requires companies to in- home in Bangor, ME. As you can see, in Most people probably didn’t see the clude in every mailing the address or a
VerDate 29-OCT-99 03:39 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G19NO6.042 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 S14862 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 19, 1999 toll-free telephone number of the noti- tive practices to suck into their net unreadable print that says but only ‘‘if fication system, but does not require people who will be lured into believing you have the winning number;’’ the that consumers submit their name in that if they buy something or subscribe headline which says ‘‘a million dollars writing to comply with the removal to something, somehow or other that is yours’’ or ‘‘just submit this number’’ system. Companies are encouraged to will increase their chances of winning a and you will have this big prize. The adopt a consumer friendly system for prize. fine print says ‘‘no,’’ you haven’t. We the removal of names from their mail- The bill we are passing today is simi- have all seen those kinds of examples ing lists, which may include the ability lar to one I had introduced in the 105th and the way people are taken in. to have names removed by calling a Congress to curb abuse of sweepstakes Fortunately, most people aren’t toll-free number. Under this legisla- solicitations and provide for additional taken in, but enough people are, so tion, companies using a toll-free num- enforcement tools against deceptive that a billion pieces of this kind of ber to permit the removal of names mailings by the Postal Service. There mail, sweepstakes mail, is sent out would not need to require a consumer were hearings held in September of 1998 each year, including by some compa- to also provide their name in writing. in the Governmental Affairs Com- nies that are otherwise companies that Any appropriate method of estab- mittee Federal Services Subcommittee have good reputations. We have had lishing a record of removal requests by that was then chaired by Senator COCH- these kinds of deceptive mailings sent consumers would comply with the re- RAN. out by Time Warner, by Reader’s Di- quirements of Section 8(d) of the legis- We learned from witnesses at that gest, by other companies whose names lation. For example, companies may hearing, including the Florida attorney have generally prompted positive re- wish to electronically verify the con- general, the Michigan assistant attor- sponses in people because their prod- sumer’s election to be removed from ney general, and the Postal Inspection ucts have been good products. Yet they their mailing list. Service, that senior citizens in par- have stooped, in the case of sweep- The legislation would strengthen the ticular are vulnerable to these decep- stakes, to deceptive practices in order ability of the Postal Service to inves- tive solicitations and that the financial to lull the people who receive these tigate, penalize, and stop deceptive cost to seniors for deceptive and fraud- sweepstakes mailings into believing mailings. It grants the Postal Inspec- ulent sweepstakes is a serious problem. that if they will just buy that maga- tion Service subpoena authority, na- Deceptive sweepstakes solicitations zine or just buy that product, they will tionwide stop mail authority, and the not only cause significant financial really seal the deal and the truck will ability to impose tougher civil pen- losses but frequently carry heavy emo- really show up with the check. We have alties. The House made several changes tional losses as well. seen these ads on television, the come- in the subpoena authority, including We have constituents in Michigan, ons. Thank God, 90 or 95 percent of the requiring the Postal Service to develop seniors, who have lost tens of thou- people look at them and can see them procedures for the issuance of sub- sands of dollars to deceptive sweep- for what they are. It is that 5 or 10 per- poenas and their approval by the Gen- stakes. Their houses are frequently cent, frequently seniors, who are taken eral Counsel or a Deputy General Coun- filled with hundreds of items they in. We are trying to stop these prac- sel of the Postal Service. The new sub- don’t need that they bought because tices. This bill, hopefully, will do ex- poena authority will give the Postal they thought somehow or other it actly that. might help them win the promised Inspection Service better ability to in- We are going to require that the prize. vestigate and stop deceptive mailings, statement that a purchase will not in- The Postal Service has inadequate and I encourage the General Counsel of crease an individual’s chances of win- tools to effectively shut down these de- the Postal Service to recognize that ef- ning and that no purchase is necessary ceptive marketing people, so we have fective enforcement of this legislation to win be clearly and conspicuously added some tough enforcement tools in requires the timely issuance of sub- displayed in the mailing—in fact more poenas. this bill. Until this bill becomes law, the Post- conspicuously displayed than the other Mr. President, S. 335 will provide im- information in the mailing. portant new consumer protections al Service, for instance, cannot impose The House changed the term ‘‘promi- against the many deceptive techniques a fine against a promoter who uses de- nently’’ in our Senate bill, which was currently used in promotional mail- ceptive practices until the Postal Serv- used to describe how these two key re- ings. I thank my colleagues for their ice first issues a stop order. Now, if you quired statements must be displayed support of this measure. wait for a stop order to be violated be- I yield to the subcommittee’s rank- fore you can impose an administrative and substituted ‘‘more conspicuously’’ for ‘‘prominently’’ to better match pre- ing minority member, Senator LEVIN. fine, what the deceptive sweepstakes As I explained earlier in my remarks, promoter does is slightly modify in vious uses of the term. The intent of he has been the chief cosponsor of this some way the deceptive mailing that is both houses on this subject is the legislation and a true leader in the ef- the subject of the stop order so they same, however, and we have empha- fort to crack down on deceptive mail- can avoid being caught by a violation sized that point in the committee re- ings. of the Postal Service stop order. The port. There should be no misunder- The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Sen- Postal Service currently is too often standing by the Postal Service and by ator from Michigan. powerless to stop these kinds of decep- the direct mail industry on what we in- Mr. LEVIN. Mr. President, I thank tive practices and the slight changes tend by this. the good Senator from Maine for her which are made in them which allow S. 335 is also going to provide the leadership in this and so many other the companies that are using these Postal Service with authority to issue consumer issues. This bill would not be practices to continue and ignore what a civil penalty for the first-time viola- here on the floor of the Senate without appears to be a stop order. tion of the statute, and we are going to her leadership on the Permanent Sub- In March and July of this year, Sen- give the Postal Service subpoena au- committee on Investigations, which ator COLLINS chaired hearings in the thority. Those are some of the things has taken responsibility for getting Permanent Subcommittee on Inves- we have done. this bill passed. tigations, where I serve as ranking Again, I thank the good Senator from S. 335, the bill we have just passed member. The bill we are taking up Maine, Ms. COLLINS, her staff, my staff, and sent to the President is going to today, S. 335, reflects what we learned Linda Gustitus and her good crew, who crack down on deceptive sweepstakes at those hearings as well. Senator COL- have made it possible for this bill to practices that have affected people in LINS has set forth for us some of the happen. Senator EDWARDS has been ex- all of our States. Most of us have per- egregious examples. I will not take the tremely helpful with his provision re- sonal knowledge of the kind of egre- time of this body to go through some of quiring a delisting of persons not want- gious deceptive practices which have these additional examples we have. We ing to receive sweepstakes mailings. been perpetrated by too many compa- have seen them all. We have seen the Senator COCHRAN has been very much nies, including some otherwise rep- big print that says, ‘‘you have just won in the forefront of this effort. Again, utable companies that are using decep- a big prize;’’ we have seen the fine, the majority and minority staffs of the
VerDate 29-OCT-99 03:39 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G19NO6.044 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S14863 Permanent Subcommittee on Inves- ‘‘(iii) a contract of indemnity or guarantee; or ‘‘(iv) any news reporting or analysis of wager- tigations have done an absolutely su- ‘‘(iv) a contract for life, health, or accident ing activity, including odds, racing or event re- perb job of putting together these hear- insurance. sults, race and event schedules, or categories of ‘‘(2) CLOSED-LOOP SUBSCRIBER-BASED SERV- ings and developing this legislation. wagering; or ICE.—The term ‘closed-loop subscriber-based ‘‘(v) any posting or reporting of any edu- I am confident that with the Senate’s service’ means any information service or system cational information on how to make a bet or passage today, the President will sign that uses— wager or the nature of betting or wagering. the bill into law. It is a bill that will ‘‘(A) a device or combination of devices— ‘‘(6) INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SERVICE.—The help end the abuses which too often ‘‘(i) expressly authorized and operated in ac- term ‘interactive computer service’ means any occur in this area and which take ad- cordance with the laws of a State, exclusively information service, system, or access software for placing, receiving, or otherwise making a bet provider that operates in, or uses a channel or vantage of people who are too often or wager described in subsection (f)(1)(B); and vulnerable to the power of suggestion. instrumentality of, interstate or foreign com- ‘‘(ii) by which a person located within any merce to provide or enable access by multiple f State must subscribe and be registered with the users to a computer server, including specifi- provider of the wagering service by name, ad- PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR cally a service or system that provides access to dress, and appropriate billing information to be the Internet. Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I ask authorized to place, receive, or otherwise make ‘‘(7) INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SERVICE PRO- unanimous consent that Benjamin a bet or wager, and must be physically located VIDER.—The term ‘interactive computer service Brown, a legislative assistant in Sen- within that State in order to be authorized to do provider’ means any person that provides an so; ator TED STEVENS’ office, be granted interactive computer service, to the extent that ‘‘(B) an effective customer verification and such person offers or provides such service. floor privileges for the 19th and 20th of age verification system, expressly authorized November. ‘‘(8) INTERNET.—The term ‘Internet’ means the and operated in accordance with the laws of the international computer network of both Federal The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without State in which it is located, to ensure that all and non-Federal interoperable packet switched objection, it is so ordered. applicable Federal and State legal and regu- data networks. f latory requirements for lawful gambling are met; ‘‘(9) PERSON.—The term ‘person’ means any and individual, association, partnership, joint ven- INTERNET GAMBLING ‘‘(C) appropriate data security standards to ture, corporation (or any affiliate of a corpora- PROHIBITION ACT OF 1999 prevent unauthorized access by any person who tion), State or political subdivision thereof, de- has not subscribed or who is a minor. partment, agency, or instrumentality of a State Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I ask ‘‘(3) FOREIGN JURISDICTION.—The term ‘for- or political subdivision thereof, or any other unanimous consent that the Senate eign jurisdiction’ means a jurisdiction of a for- government, organization, or entity (including proceed to the consideration of Cal- eign country or political subdivision thereof. any governmental entity (as defined in section endar No. 158, S. 692. ‘‘(4) GAMBLING BUSINESS.—The term ‘gambling business’ means— 3701(2) of title 28)). The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without ‘‘(10) PRIVATE NETWORK.—The term ‘private objection, it is so ordered. ‘‘(A) a business that is conducted at a gam- bling establishment, or that— network’ means a communications channel or The clerk will report the bill by title. ‘‘(i) involves— channels, including voice or computer data The legislative clerk read as follows: ‘‘(I) the placing, receiving, or otherwise mak- transmission facilities, that use either— A bill (S. 692) to prohibit Internet gam- ing of bets or wagers; or ‘‘(A) private dedicated lines; or bling, and for other purposes. ‘‘(II) the offering to engage in the placing, re- ‘‘(B) the public communications infrastruc- ture, if the infrastructure is secured by means of The Senate proceeded to consider the ceiving, or otherwise making of bets or wagers; ‘‘(ii) involves 1 or more persons who conduct, the appropriate private communications tech- bill, which had been reported from the finance, manage, supervise, direct, or own all or nology to prevent unauthorized access. Committee on the Judiciary with an part of such business; and ‘‘(11) STATE.—The term ‘State’ means a State amendment to strike all after the en- ‘‘(iii) has been or remains in substantially of the United States, the District of Columbia, acting clause and inserting in lieu continuous operation for a period in excess of 10 the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or a com- thereof the following: days or has a gross revenue of $2,000 or more monwealth, territory, or possession of the United States. S. 692 from such business during any 24-hour period; and ‘‘(12) SUBSCRIBER.—The term ‘subscriber’— Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Rep- ‘‘(B) any soliciting agent of a business de- ‘‘(A) means any person with a business rela- resentatives of the United States of America in scribed in subparagraph (A). tionship with the interactive computer service Congress assembled, ‘‘(5) INFORMATION ASSISTING IN THE PLACING provider through which such person receives ac- SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. OF A BET OR WAGER.—The term ‘information as- cess to the system, service, or network of that This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Internet Gam- sisting in the placing of a bet or wager’— provider, even if no formal subscription agree- bling Prohibition Act of 1999’’. ‘‘(A) means information that is intended by ment exists; and SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON INTERNET GAMBLING. the sender or recipient to be used by a person ‘‘(B) includes registrants, students who are (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 50 of title 18, engaged in the business of betting or wagering granted access to a university system or net- United States Code, is amended by adding at the to place, receive, or otherwise make a bet or work, and employees or contractors who are end the following: wager; and granted access to the system or network of their ‘‘(B) does not include— employer. ‘‘§ 1085. Internet gambling ‘‘(i) information concerning parimutuel pools ‘‘(b) INTERNET GAMBLING.— ‘‘(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: that is exchanged exclusively between or among ‘‘(1) PROHIBITION.—Subject to subsection (f), ‘‘(1) BETS OR WAGERS.—The term ‘bets or 1 or more racetracks or other parimutuel wager- it shall be unlawful for a person engaged in a wagers’— ing facilities licensed by the State or approved gambling business knowingly to use the Internet ‘‘(A) means the staking or risking by any per- by the foreign jurisdiction in which the facility or any other interactive computer service— son of something of value upon the outcome of is located, and 1 or more parimutuel wagering ‘‘(A) to place, receive, or otherwise make a bet a contest of others, a sporting event, or a game facilities licensed by the State or approved by or wager; or of chance, upon an agreement or understanding the foreign jurisdiction in which the facility is ‘‘(B) to send, receive, or invite information as- that the person or another person will receive located, if that information is used only to con- sisting in the placing of a bet or wager. something of value based on that outcome; duct common pool parimutuel pooling under ap- ‘‘(2) PENALTIES.—A person engaged in a gam- ‘‘(B) includes the purchase of a chance or op- plicable law; bling business who violates this section shall portunity to win a lottery or other prize (which ‘‘(ii) information exchanged exclusively be- be— opportunity to win is predominantly subject to tween or among 1 or more racetracks or other ‘‘(A) fined in an amount equal to not more chance); parimutuel wagering facilities licensed by the than the greater of— ‘‘(C) includes any scheme of a type described State or approved by the foreign jurisdiction in ‘‘(i) the total amount that such person bet or in section 3702 of title 28; and which the facility is located, and a support serv- wagered, or placed, received, or accepted in bets ‘‘(D) does not include— ice located in another State or foreign jurisdic- or wagers, as a result of engaging in that busi- ‘‘(i) a bona fide business transaction governed tion, if the information is used only for proc- ness in violation of this section; or by the securities laws (as that term is defined in essing bets or wagers made with that facility ‘‘(ii) $20,000; section 3(a)(47) of the Securities Exchange Act under applicable law; ‘‘(B) imprisoned not more than 4 years; or of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(47))) for the purchase ‘‘(iii) information exchanged exclusively be- ‘‘(C) both. or sale at a future date of securities (as that tween or among 1 or more wagering facilities ‘‘(3) PERMANENT INJUNCTIONS.—Upon convic- term is defined in section 3(a)(10) of the Securi- that are located within a single State and are li- tion of a person under this section, the court ties Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(10))); censed and regulated by that State, and any may enter a permanent injunction enjoining ‘‘(ii) a transaction on or subject to the rules of support service, wherever located, if the infor- such person from placing, receiving, or other- a contract market designated pursuant to sec- mation is used only for the pooling or processing wise making bets or wagers or sending, receiv- tion 5 of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. of bets or wagers made by or with the facility or ing, or inviting information assisting in the 7); facilities under applicable State law; placing of bets or wagers.
VerDate 29-OCT-99 05:32 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 6333 E:\CR\FM\G19NO6.046 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 S14864 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 19, 1999
‘‘(c) CIVIL REMEDIES.— shall not be liable, under this section or any ‘‘(ii) provides information reasonably suffi- ‘‘(1) JURISDICTION.—The district courts of the other provision of Federal or State law prohib- cient to permit the provider to locate (and, as United States shall have original and exclusive iting or regulating gambling or gambling-related appropriate, in a notice issued pursuant to jurisdiction to prevent and restrain violations of activities, for the use of its facilities or services paragraph (3)(A) to block access to) the material this section by issuing appropriate orders in ac- by another person to engage in Internet gam- or activity; cordance with this section, regardless of wheth- bling activity that violates such law— ‘‘(iii) is supplied to any agent of a provider er a prosecution has been initiated under this ‘‘(i) arising out of any transmitting, routing, designated in accordance with section 512(c)(2) section. or providing of connections for gambling-related of title 17, if information regarding such des- ‘‘(2) PROCEEDINGS.— material or activity (including intermediate and ignation is readily available to the public; ‘‘(A) INSTITUTION BY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.— temporary storage in the course of such trans- ‘‘(iv) provides information that is reasonably ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The United States may in- mitting, routing, or providing connections) by sufficient to permit the provider to contact the stitute proceedings under this subsection to pre- the provider, if— vent or restrain a violation of this section. law enforcement agency that issued the notice, ‘‘(I) the material or activity was initiated by including the name of the law enforcement ‘‘(ii) RELIEF.—Upon application of the United or at the direction of a person other than the States under this subparagraph, the district agency, and the name and telephone number of provider; an individual to contact at the law enforcement court may enter a temporary restraining order ‘‘(II) the transmitting, routing, or providing of or an injunction against any person to prevent agency (and, if available, the electronic mail ad- connections is carried out through an automatic dress of that individual); and or restrain a violation of this section if the court process without selection of the material or ac- determines, after notice and an opportunity for ‘‘(v) declares under penalties of perjury that tivity by the provider; the person submitting the notice is an official of a hearing, that there is a substantial probability ‘‘(III) the provider does not select the recipi- the law enforcement agency described in clause that such violation has occurred or will occur. ents of the material or activity, except as an (iv). ‘‘(B) INSTITUTION BY STATE ATTORNEY GEN- automatic response to the request of another ‘‘(3) INJUNCTIVE RELIEF.— ERAL.— person; and ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The attorney general of a ‘‘(IV) the material or activity is transmitted ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The United States, or a State (or other appropriate State official) in through the system or network of the provider State law enforcement agency acting within its which a violation of this section allegedly has without modification of its content; or authority and jurisdiction, may, not less than 24 occurred or will occur, after providing written ‘‘(ii) arising out of any gambling-related mate- hours following the issuance to an interactive notice to the United States, may institute pro- rial or activity at an online site residing on a computer service provider of a notice described ceedings under this subsection to prevent or re- computer server owned, controlled, or operated in paragraph (2)(B), in a civil action, obtain a strain the violation. by or for the provider, or arising out of referring temporary restraining order, or an injunction to ‘‘(ii) RELIEF.—Upon application of the attor- or linking users to an online location containing prevent the use of the interactive computer serv- ney general (or other appropriate State official) such material or activity, if the material or ac- ice by another person in violation of this sec- of an affected State under this subparagraph, tivity was initiated by or at the direction of a tion. the district court may enter a temporary re- person other than the provider, unless the pro- ‘‘(B) LIMITATIONS.—Notwithstanding any straining order or an injunction against any vider fails to take expeditiously, with respect to other provision of this section, in the case of person to prevent or restrain a violation of this the particular material or activity at issue, the any application for a temporary restraining section if the court determines, after notice and actions described in paragraph (2)(A) following order or an injunction against an interactive an opportunity for a hearing, that there is a the receipt by the provider of a notice described computer service provider described in para- substantial probability that such violation has in paragraph (2)(B). graph (1)(B) to prevent a violation of this occurred or will occur. ‘‘(B) ELIGIBILITY.—An interactive computer section— ‘‘(C) INDIAN LANDS.—Notwithstanding sub- service provider is described in this subpara- ‘‘(i) arising out of activity described in para- paragraphs (A) and (B), for a violation that is graph only if the provider— graph (1)(A)(i), the injunctive relief is limited alleged to have occurred, or may occur, on In- ‘‘(i) maintains and implements a written or to— dian lands (as that term is defined in section 4 electronic policy that requires the provider to of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. ‘‘(I) an order restraining the provider from terminate the account of a subscriber of its sys- 2703))— providing access to an identified subscriber of ‘‘(i) the United States shall have the enforce- tem or network expeditiously following the re- the system or network of the interactive com- ment authority provided under subparagraph ceipt by the provider of a notice described in puter service provider, if the court determines (A); and paragraph (2)(B) alleging that such subscriber that there is probable cause to believe that such ‘‘(ii) the enforcement authorities specified in has violated or is violating this section; and subscriber is using that access to violate this an applicable Tribal-State compact negotiated ‘‘(ii) with respect to the particular material or section (or to engage with another person in a under section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regu- activity at issue, has not knowingly permitted communication that violates this section), by latory Act (25 U.S.C. 2710) shall be carried out its computer server to be used to engage in activ- terminating the specified account of that sub- in accordance with that compact. ity that the provider knows is prohibited by this scriber; and ‘‘(D) EXPIRATION.—Any temporary restraining section, with the specific intent that such server ‘‘(II) an order restraining the provider from order or preliminary injunction entered pursu- be used for such purpose. providing access, by taking reasonable steps ant to subparagraph (A) or (B) shall expire if, ‘‘(2) NOTICE TO INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SERV- specified in the order to block access, to a spe- and as soon as, the United States, or the attor- ICE PROVIDERS.— cific, identified, foreign online location; ney general (or other appropriate State official) ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—If an interactive computer ‘‘(ii) arising out of activity described in para- of the State, as applicable, notifies the court service provider receives from a Federal or State graph (1)(A)(ii), the injunctive relief is limited that issued the order or injunction that the law enforcement agency, acting within its au- to— thority and jurisdiction, a written or electronic United States or the State, as applicable, will ‘‘(I) the orders described in clause (i)(I); notice described in subparagraph (B), that a not seek a permanent injunction. ‘‘(II) an order restraining the provider from particular online site residing on a computer ‘‘(3) EXPEDITED PROCEEDINGS.— providing access to the material or activity that server owned, controlled, or operated by or for ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In addition to any pro- violates this section at a particular online site the provider is being used by another person to ceeding under paragraph (2), a district court residing on a computer server operated or con- violate this section, the provider shall may, in exigent circumstances, enter a tem- trolled by the provider; and porary restraining order against a person al- expeditiously— ‘‘(III) such other injunctive remedies as the leged to be in violation of this section upon ap- ‘‘(i) remove or disable access to the material or court considers necessary to prevent or restrain plication of the United States under paragraph activity residing at that online site that alleg- access to specified material or activity that is (2)(A), or the attorney general (or other appro- edly violates this section; or prohibited by this section at a particular online priate State official) of an affected State under ‘‘(ii) in any case in which the provider does location residing on a computer server operated paragraph (2)(B), without notice and the oppor- not control the site at which the subject mate- or controlled by the provider, that are the least tunity for a hearing as provided in rule 65(b) of rial or activity resides, the provider, through burdensome to the provider among the forms of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (except as any agent of the provider designated in accord- relief that are comparably effective for that pur- provided in subsection (d)(3)), if the United ance with section 512(c)(2) of title 17, or other pose. States or the State, as applicable, demonstrates responsible identified employee or contractor— that there is probable cause to believe that the ‘‘(I) notify the Federal or State law enforce- ‘‘(C) CONSIDERATIONS.—The court, in deter- use of the Internet or other interactive computer ment agency that the provider is not the proper mining appropriate injunctive relief under this service at issue violates this section. recipient of such notice; and paragraph, shall consider— ‘‘(B) HEARINGS.—A hearing requested con- ‘‘(II) upon receipt of a subpoena, cooperate ‘‘(i) whether such an injunction, either alone cerning an order entered under this paragraph with the Federal or State law enforcement agen- or in combination with other such injunctions shall be held at the earliest practicable time. cy in identifying the person or persons who con- issued, and currently operative, against the ‘‘(d) INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SERVICE PRO- trol the site. same provider would significantly (and, in the VIDERS.— ‘‘(B) NOTICE.—A notice is described in this case of relief under subparagraph (B)(ii), taking ‘‘(1) IMMUNITY FROM LIABILITY FOR USE BY subparagraph only if it— into account, among other factors, the conduct ANOTHER.— ‘‘(i) identifies the material or activity that al- of the provider, unreasonably) burden either the ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—An interactive computer legedly violates this section, and alleges that provider or the operation of the system or net- service provider described in subparagraph (B) such material or activity violates this section; work of the provider;
VerDate 29-OCT-99 05:32 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 6333 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.006 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S14865 ‘‘(ii) whether implementation of such an in- ‘‘(iii) initiated from a State in which betting Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I ask junction would be technically feasible and effec- or wagering on that same type of live horse or unanimous consent that reading of the tive, and would not materially interfere with ac- live dog racing is lawful and received in a State amendment be dispensed with. cess to lawful material at other online locations; in which such betting or wagering is lawful; The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without ‘‘(iii) whether other less burdensome and com- ‘‘(iv) subject to the regulatory oversight of the parably effective means of preventing or re- State in which the bet or wager is received and objection, it is so ordered. straining access to the illegal material or activ- subject by such State to minimum control stand- (The text of the amendment is print- ity are available; and ards for the accounting, regulatory inspection, ed in today’s RECORD under ‘‘Amend- ‘‘(iv) the magnitude of the harm likely to be and auditing of all such bets or wagers trans- ments Submitted.’’) suffered by the community if the injunction is mitted from 1 State to another; and AMENDMENT NO. 2783 TO AMENDMENT NO. 2782 not granted. ‘‘(v) in the case of— Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I send ‘‘(D) NOTICE AND EX PARTE ORDERS.—Injunc- ‘‘(I) live horse racing, made in accordance tive relief under this paragraph shall not be with the Interstate Horse Racing Act of 1978 (15 an amendment to the desk and ask for available without notice to the service provider U.S.C. 3001 et seq.); or its immediate consideration. and an opportunity for such provider to appear ‘‘(II) live dog racing, subject to consent agree- The PRESIDING OFFICER. The before the court, except for orders ensuring the ments that are comparable to those required by clerk will report. preservation of evidence or other orders having the Interstate Horse Racing Act of 1978, ap- The legislative clerk read as follows: no material adverse effect on the operation of proved by the appropriate State regulatory The Senator from Maine [Ms. COLLINS], for the communications network of the service pro- agencies, in the State receiving the signal, and Mr. CAMPBELL, proposes an amendment num- vider. in the State in which the bet or wager origi- bered 2783 to amendment No. 2782. ‘‘(4) EFFECT ON OTHER LAW.— nates; or ‘‘(A) IMMUNITY FROM LIABILITY FOR COMPLI- ‘‘(C) any otherwise lawful bet or wager that is Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I ask ANCE.—An interactive computer service provider placed, received, or otherwise made for a fan- unanimous consent that reading of the shall not be liable for any damages, penalty, or tasy sports league game or contest. amendment be dispensed with. forfeiture, civil or criminal, under Federal or ‘‘(2) BETS OR WAGERS MADE BY AGENTS OR The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without State law for taking in good faith any action PROXIES.— objection, it is so ordered. described in paragraph (2)(A) to comply with a ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) does not The amendment is as follows: notice described in paragraph (2)(B), or com- apply in any case in which a bet or wager is On page 35 of the Kyl-Bryan substitute, plying with any court order issued under para- placed, received, or otherwise made by the use of after line 18, insert the following: graph (3). an agent or proxy using the Internet or an (4) INDIAN GAMING.— ‘‘(B) DISCLAIMER OF OBLIGATIONS.—Nothing interactive computer service. (A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), in this section may be construed to impose or ‘‘(B) QUALIFICATION.—Nothing in this para- the prohibition in this section does not apply authorize an obligation on an interactive com- graph may be construed to prohibit the owner to any otherwise lawful bet or wager that is puter service provider described in paragraph operator of a parimutuel wagering facility that placed, received, or otherwise made on any (1)(B)— is licensed by a State from employing an agent game that constitutes class II gaming or ‘‘(i) to monitor material or use of its service; or in the operation of the account wagering system class III gaming (as those terms are defined ‘‘(ii) except as required by a notice or an order owned or operated by the parimutuel facility. in section 4 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory of a court under this subsection, to gain access ‘‘(3) ADVERTISING AND PROMOTION.—The pro- Act, 25 U.S.C. 2703), or the sending, receiving, to, to remove, or to disable access to material. hibition of subsection (b)(1)(B) does not apply to or inviting of information assisting in the ‘‘(C) RIGHTS OF SUBSCRIBERS.—Nothing in this advertising or promotion of any activity that is placing of any such bet or wager, as applica- section may be construed to prejudice the right not prohibited by subsection (b)(1)(A). ble, if— of a subscriber to secure an appropriate deter- ‘‘(g) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this (i) the game is permitted under and con- mination, as otherwise provided by law, in a section may be construed to affect any prohibi- ducted in accordance with the Indian Gam- Federal court or in a State or local tribunal or tion or remedy applicable to a person engaged in ing Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.); agency, that the account of such subscriber a gambling business under any other provision (ii) each person placing, receiving, or oth- should not be terminated pursuant to this sub- of Federal or State law.’’. erwise making such bet or wager, or trans- section, or should be restored. (b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—The analysis for mitting such information, is physically lo- ‘‘(e) AVAILABILITY OF RELIEF.—The avail- chapter 50 of title 18, United States Code, is cated on Indian lands (as that term is de- ability of relief under subsections (c) and (d) amended by adding at the end the following: fined in section 4 of Indian Gaming Regu- shall not depend on, or be affected by, the initi- ‘‘1085. Internet gambling.’’. ation or resolution of any action under sub- latory Act, 25 U.S.C. 2703) when such person section (b), or under any other provision of Fed- SEC. 3. REPORT ON ENFORCEMENT. places, receives, or otherwise makes the bet eral or State law. Not later than 3 years after the date of enact- or wager, or transmits such information; ‘‘(f) APPLICABILITY.— ment of this Act, the Attorney General shall (iii) the game is conducted on a closed-loop ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), submit to Congress a report, which shall subscriber-based system or a private net- the prohibition in this section does not apply include— work; and to— (1) an analysis of the problems, if any, associ- (iv) in the case of a game that constitutes ‘‘(A) any otherwise lawful bet or wager that is ated with enforcing section 1085 of title 18, class III gaming— placed, received, or otherwise made wholly United States Code, as added by section 2 of this (I) the game is authorized under, and is intrastate for a State lottery, or for a multi- Act; conducted in accordance with, the respective State lottery operated jointly between 2 or more (2) recommendations for the best use of the re- Tribal-State compacts (entered into and ap- States in conjunction with State lotteries if— sources of the Department of Justice to enforce proved pursuant to section 11(d) of the In- ‘‘(i) each such lottery is expressly authorized, that section; and dian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 U.S.C. 2710) and licensed or regulated, under applicable (3) an estimate of the amount of activity and governing gaming activity on the Indian State law; money being used to gamble on the Internet. lands, in each respective State, on which ‘‘(ii) the bet or wager is placed on an inter- SEC. 4. SEVERABILITY. each person placing, receiving, or otherwise active computer service that uses a private net- If any provision of this Act, an amendment making such bet or wager, or transmitting work; made by this Act, or the application of such pro- such information, is physically located when ‘‘(iii) each person placing or otherwise making vision or amendment to any person or cir- such person places, receives, or otherwise that bet or wager is physically located when cumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the re- makes the bet or wager, or transmits such such bet or wager is placed at a facility that is mainder of this Act, the amendments made by information; and open to the general public; and this Act, and the application of this Act and the (II) each such Tribal-State compact ex- ‘‘(iv) each such lottery complies with sections provisions of such amendments to any other per- pressly provides that the game may be con- 1301 through 1304, and other applicable provi- son or circumstance shall not be affected there- ducted using the Internet or other inter- sions of Federal law; by. active computer service only on a closed- loop subscriber-based system or a private ‘‘(B) any otherwise lawful bet or wager that is AMENDMENT NO. 2782 placed, received, or otherwise made on an inter- network. state or intrastate basis on a live horse or a live (Purpose: To provide a complete substitute) (B) ACTIVITIES UNDER EXISTING COMPACTS.— dog race, or the sending, receiving, or inviting Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I send The requirement of subparagraph (A)(iv)(II) of information assisting in the placing of such a an amendment to the desk and ask for shall not apply in the case of gaming activ- bet or wager, if such bet or wager, or the trans- its immediate consideration. ity, otherwise subject to this section, that mission of such information, as applicable, is— The PRESIDING OFFICER. The was being conducted on Indian lands on Sep- ‘‘(i) expressly authorized, and licensed or reg- tember 1, 1999, with the approval of the state ulated by the State in which such bet or wager clerk will report. gaming commission or like regulatory au- is received, under applicable Federal and such The legislative clerk read as follows: thority of the State in which such Indian State’s laws; The Senator from Maine [Ms. COLLINS], for lands are located, but without such required ‘‘(ii) placed on a closed-loop subscriber-based Mr. KYL, for himself and Mr. BRYAN, pro- compact approval, until the date on which service; poses an amendment numbered 2782. the compact governing gaming activity on
VerDate 29-OCT-99 05:32 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.006 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 S14866 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 19, 1999 such Indian lands expires (exclusive of any ings on an Internet gambling bill in tailored to this new medium—for en- automatic or discretionary renewal or exten- that the last Congress (H.R. 2380) and forcing that prohibition. In estab- sion of such compact), so long as such gam- approved a revised version of the bill lishing such a mechanism, however, it ing activity is conducted using the Internet (H.R. 4427), but the House did not com- is also important to avoid impeding or or other interactive computer service only on a closed-loop subscriber-based system or a plete action on the legislation due to disrupting the use of the Internet as an private network. For purposes of this sub- the lateness of the session, and the instrument of lawful activity. I am paragraph, the phrase ‘‘conducted on Indian Senate language was not included in confident that S. 602 meets these objec- lands’’ shall refer to all Indian lands on the final version of the appropriations tives. Moreover, the fact that the legis- which any person placing, receiving, or oth- measure. New legislation, similar to S. lation is strongly supported by the erwise making a bet or wager, or sending, re- 692, has been introduced in the House chief law enforcement officers of the ceiving, or inviting information assisting in in this Congress, and I am quite hope- States is compelling evidence that it the placing of a bet or wager, is physically ful that Internet gambling legislation strikes the right balance between Fed- located when such person places, receives, or will be enacted into law early next eral and State authority in this area. otherwise makes the bet or wager, or sends, S. 692 creates a new section 1085 of receives, or invites such information. year. title 18. It prohibits any person en- Mr. KYL. Mr. President, I rise in Mr. President, as documented in the Judiciary Committee’s report, both the gaged in a gambling business from strong support of S. 692, the Internet using the Internet to place, receive, or Gambling Prohibition Act of 1999. As number of Internet gambling sites, and Internet gambling revenues, have otherwise make a bet or wager, or to we move toward passage of this land- send, receive, or invite information as- mark legislation, I want to thank espe- grown rapidly since Internet gambling first appeared in the summer of 1995. sisting in the placing of a bet or wager, cially Senator BRYAN, the original co- Two studies cited by the National and it establishes mechanisms tailored sponsor of S. 692, Senator FEINSTEIN, Gambling Impact Study Commission in to the Internet to enforce this prohibi- the ranking member of the Sub- tion. The new section provides criminal committee on Technology, Terrorism, its ‘‘Final Report’’ to Congress this summer indicate that Internet gam- penalties for violations, authorizes and Government Information, and Sen- civil enforcement proceedings by Fed- ator HATCH, the Chairman of the Judi- bling revenues have doubled every year for the past three years. One study re- eral and State authorities, and estab- ciary Committee. I also want to ac- lishes mechanisms for requiring Inter- knowledge the role of Senator CAMP- ported growth from $300 million in 1998 to $651 million in 1999, and projected net service providers to terminate or BELL in helping ensure that the legisla- block access to material or activity tion addressed issues of concern to In- revenues of $2.3 billion by 2001. Another study reported growth from $445.4 mil- that violates the prohibition. dian tribes, and Senator LEAHY, the Because section 1085, as reported by lion in 1997 to $919.1 million in 1998. ranking member of the Judiciary Com- the Judiciary Committee, is com- mittee, who helped advance S. 692 not- The Commission noted estimates by prehensively analyzed in the Judiciary withstanding his differences with some the Financial Times and Smith Barney Committee’s report, I will only de- of its features. Finally, I want to thank that Internet gambling will reach an- scribe its structure here. Section all of my colleagues who joined the leg- nual revenues of $10 billion early in the 1085(a) contains definitions. Section islation as cosponsors following its in- new millennium. A third study cited by 1085(b) contains the prohibitions and troduction. the Commission found that the number criminal penalties. Section 1085(c) pro- S. 692 enjoys extraordinarily broad of online gamblers had increased from vides for civil actions by the United public support. Those supporting it— 6.9 million to 14.5 million between 1997 States and the States to prevent and ranging from Federal and State law-en- and 1998. According to the Commission, restrain violations, applicable to per- forcement authorities to religious, con- ‘‘virtually all observers assume the sons other than Internet service pro- sumer, and family groups, from the rapid growth of Internet gambling will viders. Section 1085(d) establishes re- professional and amateur sports continue.’’ sponsibilities for Internet service pro- leagues to the thoroughbred racing in- It is no exaggeration to say that the viders, enforceable through civil in- dustry—are fully identified in the Judi- Internet has brought gambling into junction actions by Federal and State ciary Committee report accompanying every home that has purchased a com- authorities, and grants providers speci- the bill. I want to acknowledge, in par- puter and chosen to go online. Accord- fied immunities from liability. Section ticular, the support of the National As- ing to the Department of Commerce, 1085(e) specifies that the availability of sociation of Attorneys General, the Na- 26.2 percent of U.S. households had relief under subsections (c) and (d), tional Football League, and the Na- Internet access at the end of 1998, rep- which is civil in nature, is independent tional Collegiate Athletic Association, resenting 27 million households. That of any criminal action under sub- and the constructive role played by the percentage will undoubtedly continue section (b) or any other Federal or American Horse Council, the Major to grow (millions of other U.S. house- State law. Section 1085(f) specifies cat- League Baseball Players Association, holds have computers but simply have egories of activities that, if otherwise and America Online, which spear- not yet chosen to go online) until, not lawful, are not subject to the prohibi- headed a coalition of Internet service long from now, online home computers tion of subsection (b). This subsection providers and others interested in this will be as commonplace as the humble addresses State lotteries, pari-mutuel legislation. I would particularly like to telephone—which, like the telegraph animal wagering, Indian gaming, and thank David Remes, Gerry Waldron, before it, seemed as revolutionary and fantasy sports league games and con- Marty Gold, Daniel Nestel, and Ste- wondrous, in its day, as the Internet tests. Section 1085(f) specifically pre- phen Higgins, whose hard work and seems today. serves the regulatory authority of the diplomatic skills played an important As a new technology, the Internet States with respect to gambling and role in securing the passage of the bill presents new problems that current gambling-related activities not subject by unanimous consent. law must be updated to address. These to the prohibition of subsection (b), but The bill we are voting on today, problems, which S. 692 is designed to nothing in section 1085 authorizes dis- which the Judiciary Committee ap- remedy, are extensively documented in criminatory or other action by a State proved in June by a recorded vote of the Judiciary Committee’s report. that would otherwise violate the Com- 16–1, is the culmination of efforts They include, among others, serious merce Clause. Section 1085(g) specifies begun in the last Congress, when Sen- harms to our young people, who are the that section 1085 does not create immu- ator BRYAN and I first introduced legis- most adept users of Internet; harms nity from any criminal prosecution lation to prohibit Internet gambling. from gambling on professional and under any provision of Federal or State That legislation, S. 474, was approved amateur sports events and athletic per- law, except as provided in subsection by the Judiciary Committee in August formances; and harms relating to path- (d), and does not affect any prohibition 1997 and passed by a 90–10 vote as an ological gambling and criminal activ- or remedy applicable to a person en- amendment to the Commerce-Justice- ity. It is vital that we legislate to pre- gaged in a gambling business under any State appropriations bill in July 1998. vent the Internet from being used as an other provision of Federal or State law. The Subcommittee on Crime of the instrument of gambling and establish Mr. President, the bill we are voting House Judiciary Committee held hear- an effective mechanism—specifically on today has been modified in several
VerDate 29-OCT-99 04:51 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.008 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S14867 respects from the version reported by section (f)(1)(B)(v)(I) to recognize, ex- the Indian lands in Idaho on which Per- the Judiciary Committee. All but one pressly, the authority of the State in son B is physically located when the of those modifications affect section which the bet or wager originates to bet is placed, received, or otherwise 1085. The other affects section 3 of the prohibit or regulate the activity relat- made. In addition, both compacts must bill, which calls for a report to Con- ing to live horse races described in sub- expressly provide such gaming activity gress by the Department of Justice two paragraph (B). this authority was im- may be conducted using the Internet or years after enactment. plicit; the amendment makes it ex- other interactive computer service Proceedings by Sports Organizations. plicit. only on a closed-loop subscriber-based The bill has been amended by adding a Indian Gaming. The bill has been system or a private network. new subparagraph (C) to section amended to address Indian gaming by 1085(c)(2) to authorize a professional or adding a new paragraph (4) to section Paragraph (4) further provides that amateur sports organization whose 1085(f). The new paragraph specifies the requirement of compact language games, or the performances of whose that the prohibitions of section 1085 re- expressly allowing the game to be con- athletes in such games, are alleged to garding the use of the Internet or other ducted using the Internet or other be the basis of a violation of section interactive computer service do not interactive computer service, if a 1085 to institute civil proceedings in an apply to any otherwise lawful bet or closed-loop subscriber-based system or appropriate district court of the United wager that is placed, received, or oth- a private network is used, as set forth States to prevent or restrain the viola- erwise made on any game that con- in paragraph (4)(A)(iv)(II), shall not tion. The right of action provided by stitutes class II gaming or class III apply in the case of gaming activity, this subparagraph is similar to the gaming (as those terms are defined in otherwise subject to section 1085, that right of action for sports organizations the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act), or was being conducted on Indian lands provided in the Professional and Ama- the sending, receiving, or inviting of using the Internet or other interactive teur Sports Protection Act, 28 U.S.C. information assisting in the placing of computer service on September 1, 1999, 3701 et seq., which Congress passed in any such bet or wager, as applicable, if with the approval of the State gaming 1992 to halt the spread of legalized four conditions are met. commission or like regulatory author- sports betting and S. 692 is intended to First, the game must be one that is ity of the State in which such Indian reinforce. The new subparagraph limits permitted under and conducted in ac- lands are located, but without the com- proceedings, by sports organizations cordance with the Indian Gaming Reg- pact language required by paragraph against interactive computer service ulatory Act. (4)(A)(iv)(II). The exemption applies providers. Second, each person placing, receiv- only until the date on which the com- Advertising and promotion of Non- ing, or otherwise making such bet or pact governing gaming activity on Internet Gambling. The bill has been wager, or transmitting (i.e., sending, such Indian lands expires (exclusive of amended by adding a new paragraph (4) receiving, or inviting) such informa- any automatic or discretionary re- to section 1085(d) to address the respon- tion, must be physically located in a newal or extension of such compact), sibilities and immunities of an Inter- gaming facility on Indian lands when and only to the extent that the gaming net service provider relating to the use such person places, receives, or other- activity is conducted using the In- of its facilities by another person to wise makes the bet or wager, or trans- terned or other interactive computer advertise or promote non-online gam- mits such information. service on a closed-loop subscriber- bling. Paragraph (4) generally mirrors Third, the game must be conducted based system or a private network. the approach of paragraph (1), which on a closed-loop subscriber-based sys- This exemption avoids the need to re- addresses the responsibilities and im- tem or a private network. negotiate compacts currently in effect munities of an Internet service pro- Fourth, in the case of a game that if the specified conditions are satisfied. vider relating to the use of its facilities constitutes class III gaming, the game The exemption waives only the require- by another person to engage in online must be authorized under, and be con- ment of subparagraph (A)(iv)(II). It gambling activity. Paragraph (4) pro- ducted in accordance with, the respec- does not in any manner waive the com- vides that, if specified conditions are tive Tribal-State compacts that govern pact authorization requirement of sub- met, a provider shall not be liable, gaming activity on the Indian lands on paragraph (A)(iv)(I), the physical loca- under any provision of Federal or State which each person placing, receiving, tion requirement of subparagraph law prohibiting or regulating gambling or otherwise making such bet or wager, (A)(ii), the closed-loop or private net- or gambling-related activities, or or transmitting such information, is work requirement of subparagraph under any State law prohibiting or reg- physically located when such person (A)(iii), or any other requirement of ulating advertising and promotional places, receives, or otherwise makes subparagraph (A). activities, either (1) for content, pro- the bet or wager, or transmits such in- vided by another person, that adver- formation. In addition, each such Trib- To use the previous illustration, if tises or promotes non-Internet gam- al-State compact must expressly pro- the compact that currently governs bling activity that is unlawful under vide that the game may be conducted gaming on the Indian lands in Florida such Federal or State law, arising out using the Internet or other interactive on which Person A is physically lo- of any of the activities described in computer service only on a closed-loop cated when Person A places or makes section 1085(d)(1)(A)(i) or (ii); or (2) for subscriber-based system or a private the bet or wager does not expressly content, provided by another person, network. specify that the game may be con- that advertises or promotes non-Inter- To illustrate one application of the ducted using the Internet or other net gambling activity that is lawful fourth condition, suppose that Person interactive computer service (if a under both Federal law and the law of A, a player who is physically located closed-loop subscriber-based system or the State where the gambling activity on Indian lands in Florida, by using the a private network is used), the game is being conducted. To be eligible for Internet or other interactive computer may nevertheless be conducted on immunity under paragraph (4), a pro- service, places or makes a bet or wager those Indian lands using the Internet vider must, among other things, offer with Person B, a person operating or or other interactive computer service residential customers at reasonable employed by a casino who is physically (if a closed-loop subscriber-based sys- cost computer software, or another fil- located on Indian lands in Idaho. To be tem or a private network is used), not- tering or blocking system, that in- lawful under section 1085 in this illus- withstanding section 1085, until that cludes the capability of filtering or tration, the game, among other things, compact expires, if the game was one blocking access by minors to Internet must be one that is expressly author- that was conducted on those Indian gambling sites that violate section ized (1) by the compact that governs lands in Florida using the Internet or 1085. Paragraph (4) provides for injunc- gaming activity on the Indian lands in other interactive computer service on tive relief under specified cir- Florida on which Person A is phys- September 1, 1999, with the approval of cumstances. ically located when he places or makes the gaming commission or like regu- Horse Racing. The bill has been the bet or wager, and (2) by the com- latory authority of Florida. After the amended by adding language to sub- pact that governs gaming activity on compact expires, however, any gaming
VerDate 29-OCT-99 05:25 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.010 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 S14868 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 19, 1999 on those Indian lands using the Inter- Internet gambling ban for certain for addressing my third concern in net or other interactive computer serv- forms of gambling activities without a their substitute amendment. I was con- ice is subject to the requirement of ex- clear public policy justification. For cerned that the bill might unneces- press approval (limited to use of a example, the bill exempts parimutuel sarily create immunity from criminal closed-loop subscriber-based system or wagering on horse and dog racing from prosecution under State law for Inter- a private network) in subsequent com- its ban on Internet gambling. The net gambling. Any new immunity pacts governing gaming activity on sponsors of S. 692 have offered no com- would have been in sharp contrast to those Indian lands. pelling reason for this special treat- existing Federal law, which specifically Rule of Construction. The bill has ment of one form of gambling. Indeed, does not grant immunity from State been amended by adding a new para- the Department of Justice is ‘‘espe- prosecution for illegal gambling over graph to section 1085(g) to make even cially troubled by the broad exemp- wire communications. more explicit that, except as provided tions given to parimutuel wagering, To address this concern, the sub- in subsection (d), section 1085 does not which essentially would make legal on stitute amendment adds a new Rules of create immunity from any criminal the Internet types of parimutuel wa- Construction section, section 2 (g)(1), prosecution under any provision of gering that are not legal in the phys- which I authored. This section makes Federal or State law. This amendment ical world,’’ according to its June 9, it clear that, except for the liability responds to a concern expressed by 1999 views letter on S. 692. limits provided to Interactive Com- Senator LEAHY. Broad exemptions from the Internet puter Service Providers in section 2 (d) Report on Enforcement. Section 3 of gambling ban also contradict the re- of the bill, S. 692 does not provide any S. 692 has been amended to require the cent recommendations to Congress of other immunity from Federal or State Justice Department to include in the the National Gambling Impact Study prosecution for illegal Internet gam- required report to Congress further in- Commission. After 2 years of taking bling. formation specified by the Gambling testimony at hearings across the coun- Indeed, the New York Attorney Gen- Impact Study Commission in its ‘‘Final try, the Commission has endorsed the eral recently prosecuted an offshore Report’’. need for Federal legislation to prohibit Internet gambling company, World Mr. President, S. 692 is urgently Internet gambling. But the Commis- Interactive Gaming Corporation, for needed to address a serious social prob- sion clearly rejected adding new ex- targeting New York citizens in viola- lem. It reflects the very best thinking emptions to the law in such a ban. tion of State and Federal anti-gam- on how to update existing law to meet Indeed, in a letter to me dated June bling statutes. This past July, the New the challenges of a new technology. I 15, 1999, Kay C. James, Chair, and Wil- York State Supreme Court upheld that respectfully urge its passage. liam Bible, Commissioner, of the Na- prosecution. Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I have tional Gambling Impact Study Com- As a former State prosecutor in long been an advocate for legislation mission, wrote: Vermont, I strongly believe that Con- that ensures that existing laws keep The Commission recommends to the Presi- gress should not tie the hands of our pace with developing technology. It is dent, Congress, and the Department of Jus- State crime-fighting partners in the for this reason that I have sponsored tice (DOJ) that the Federal government battle against Internet gambling when and supported over the past few years a should prohibit, without allowing new exemp- we do not mandate Federal preemption tions or the expansion of existing federal exemp- host of bills to bring us into the 21st tions to other jurisdictions, Internet gambling of state criminal laws for other forms Century. not already authorized within the United of illegal gambling. Instead, we need to This same impetus underlies my sup- States or among parties in the United States foster effective Federal-State partner- port of legislation to ensure our na- and any foreign jurisdiction. (emphasis in ships to combat illegal Internet gam- tion’s gambling laws keep pace with the original) bling. developing technology, particularly My second concern is that the bill During our consideration of the the Internet. The Department of Jus- unnecessarily creates a new section in Internet Gambling Prohibition Act in tice has noted that ‘‘the Internet has our Federal gambling statutes, which this Congress and the last, the sponsors allowed for new types of electronic may prove inconsistent with existing of the bill and members of the Senate gambling, including interactive games law and established legal precedent. In- Judiciary Committee have improved such as poker or blackjack, that may stead of updating section 1084 of title and refined the bill on a bipartisan not clearly be included within the 18, which has prohibited interstate basis. The bill now applies only to gam- types of gambling currently made ille- gambling through wire communica- bling businesses, instead of individual gal. . . .’’ This new technology clearly tions since 1961, S. 692 creates a new betters. This will permit Federal au- has the potential to diminish the effec- section 1085 to title 18 to cover Internet thorities to target the prosecution of tiveness of current gambling statutes. gambling only. Creating a new section interstate gambling businesses, while Vermonters have spoken clearly that out of whole cloth with different defini- rightly leaving the prosecution of indi- they do not want certain types of gam- tions and other provisions from exist- vidual bettors to the discretion of state bling permitted in our state, and they ing Federal gambling statutes creates authorities acting under state law. do not want current laws to be ren- overlapping and inconsistent Federal As Senators continue to work to- dered obsolete by the Internet. gambling laws for no good reason. gether to enact a ban on Internet gam- Vermont Attorney General William According to its views letter on S. bling, we should keep these words from Sorrell strongly supports federal legis- 692, the Department of Justice believes the Department of Justice foremost in lation to address Internet gambling, as overlapping and inconsistent Federal our minds: ‘‘[A]ny prohibitions that do other law enforcement officials in gambling laws can be easily avoided by are designed to prohibit criminal activ- Vermont. amending section 1084 of title 18 to ity on the Internet must be carefully I believe, therefore, that there is con- cover Internet gambling: drafted to accomplish the legislation’s siderable value in updating our federal We therefore strongly recommend that objectives without stifling the growth gambling statutes, which is why I Congress address the objective of this legis- of the Internet or chilling its use as a voted for S. 692, the ‘‘Internet Gam- lation through amending existing gambling communication medium.’’ bling Prohibition Act,’’ during Senate laws, rather than creating new laws that spe- I look forward to working with my Judiciary Committee consideration. I cifically govern the Internet. Indeed, the De- colleagues on both sides of the aisle support the bill as a step forward in partment of Justice believes that an amend- and the administration to enact into ment to section 1084 of title 18 could satisfy our bipartisan efforts to make sure our many of the concerns addressed in S. 692, as law carefully drafted legislation to up- federal laws continue to keep pace with well as ensure that the same laws apply to date our Federal gambling statutes to emerging technologies. gambling businesses, whether they operate ensure that new types of gambling ac- I do, however, have concerns that S. over the Internet, the telephone, or some tivities made possible by emerging 692 might unnecessarily weaken exist- other instrumentality of interstate com- technologies are prohibited. ing federal and state gambling laws. merce. Mr. TORRICELLI. Mr. President, I My first concern is that the bill pro- I want to thank the sponsors of the express my deep appreciation and vides unnecessary exemptions from its legislation, Senators KYL and BRYAN, thanks to Senator KYL for his diligent
VerDate 29-OCT-99 04:51 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.012 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S14869 work to help resolve my concerns. This with drafting any language dealing the specific authorization required in compromise is reflected in section 1085. with Indian gaming and the IGRA cen- S. 692, the amendment allows them to This language is very important to per- tered on the following requirements: continue the operations of those games mitting parimutuel wagering on horse 1. All gaming must be legal under until the expiration of their current racing to be exempted from the prohi- current federal law; compact. The current language ad- bition on Internet gambling that we 2. All class III gaming (casino style) dressing technology that is included in are enacting. must be conducted pursuant to a tribal most compacts does not contain the The new language makes explicit state compact; and exact terminology as defined in S. 692. which was implicit and assures that 3. All aspects of the game must take Additionally, there are other states every State has the right to establish place on Indian Lands (game, player, where language that addresses the use requirements for Internet and phone facility, server, etc.). of technology is not contained in the wagering that will best serve the public It is critical to note that there is no compact, but the state has consented and governmental interests of the tribe in the U.S. that is currently offer- to the use of technology. My amend- State and to do so, if it wishes, before ing online/Internet betting. Instead, ment contains a ‘‘grandfather clause’’ such wagering takes place. I believe several tribes currently use widely- for those operations, which will run this is so important because it ensures available technology to broadcast until their compacts expire by their that a State will have its traditional bingo to numerous operations located own terms. Once a tribe’s compact ex- authority to safeguard the interests of on Indian lands or to link class III pires, the compact must be renegoti- its consumers and racing industry games for the purpose of determining ated and will be required to contain through the regulatory and approval an aggregate betting pool for the pur- language which conforms to the re- process of proposed phone or Internet pose of offering bigger prizes. quirements of S. 692. wagering. It is my understanding in supporting Contrary to the views of some, Indian Mr. CAMPBELL. Mr. President, the substitute along with my amend- tribes are not generally interested in today the Senate considers S. 692, enti- ment, that S. 692 allows tribes to con- operating games which are broadcast tled the ‘‘Internet Gaming Prohibition tinue their current practices regarding on the ‘‘world wide web’’ or the Inter- Act.’’ As my colleagues know, I sup- the use of technology to enhance the net, and in which a person sitting in port this measure but from the day effectiveness and profitability of their their home may ‘‘log on’’ to a com- this bill was introduced I have had con- operations, but does not authorize any puter and begin placing bets. cerns about its scope. As Chairman of tribe to operate betting on the Internet Indian tribes are, however, interested the Committee on Indian Affairs I have as it currently perceived by the general in continuing the operation of the been concerned that existing law, public. games they currently have, and which namely the Indian Gaming Regulatory The specific provisions of my amend- they have agreed with their states are Act, would be irreparably harmed un- ment address all currently legal class legal. This amendment allows them to less we made certain changes to the II and class III gaming, as defined in do just that. bill. the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 Mr. FEINGOLD. Mr. President, I rise This is an important bill and I sup- U.S.C. § 2701 et seq. today to express my opposition to the port the intent of the bill’s sponsors to Accordingly, for Indian gaming ac- Internet Gambling Prohibition Act of make it more difficult for this kind of tivities to not run afoul of the provi- 1999. I voted against this bill when it gaming to be conducted, particularly sions of S. 692 was brought to the floor last year as an by underage players. 1. The game must be conducted ac- amendment to an appropriations bill If enacted, this bill would prohibit cording to the requirements of IGRA. and again this year when it came Internet gambling, but make excep- 2. All persons making or receiving a through the Judiciary Committee. tions for certain segments of the gam- bet, or transmitting information re- I am pleased to see that Senator KYL ing industry which currently use a va- garding a bet must be on Indian lands. was able to reach an agreement with riety of technologies to enhance tradi- That means all aspects of the game Senator CAMPBELL and others to ad- tional gaming. must be located on tribal land, includ- dress Indian gaming issues. The bill’s It is important for my colleagues to ing the person playing the game, the special treatment of certain forms of realize that the bill does not prohibit actual machine which is the game, and gambling was one of the reasons I all forms of gaming using available any computer server which may be voted against this bill when it was be- high-technology. When I reviewed S. used to keep track of information re- fore the Judiciary Committee. It al- 692 for the first time, I realized that lating to the play of the game. In the lowed state lotteries, fantasy sports certain gaming activities currently case of a satellite (which cannot be lo- leagues, and horse and dog track racing being conducted by Indian tribes would cated on Indian land), all machinery to continue to operate over the Inter- be prohibited by this bill. used to receive the signal must be lo- net, but prohibited use of the Internet My concerns centered on the fact cated on Indian land. for Indian gaming, which is expressly that the same or similar activities 3. The game must be conducted on an authorized by federal law. Under Sen- were allowed to other entities—such as interactive computer service which ator CAMPBELL’s amendment to S. 692, the states, the horse-racing industry uses a closed-loop subscriber based Indian gaming can continue to operate and others—that were disallowed to service or a private network. over the Internet under certain cir- tribes. This fundamental inequity is 4. Where class III games are con- cumstances. what led me to propose fair treatment ducted, each tribe participating in a While I am glad to see the Indian for tribal governmental gaming. network must have a compact which gaming issue addressed, I nevertheless In addition to issues of equity, the authorizes games to be conducted using remain concerned with the fact that economic impacts of Indian gaming are the technology described, that is, an this bill singles out one emerging tech- substantial and should be acknowl- interactive computer service which nology, the Internet, to try to attack edged. These revenues provide an im- uses a closed-loop subscriber-based the broad, complex social problems as- portant source of development capital service or a private network. It is crit- sociated with gambling. The Internet is and jobs for many tribes across the ical to understand that this means that an evolving technology, and its full po- country. Contrary to the views many a tribe must have a compact only in tential as a medium of expression has here hold, Indian gaming is very highly the state in which they are located, not not been reached. While I share some of regulated by federal, state and tribal that they compact with every state in the concerns about the dangers of gam- officials, and has been subject to fed- which the network is located. bling that have inspired the sponsors of eral law for eleven years. 5. In jurisdictions where class III this legislation, I am reluctant to start I addressed my concerns to the Sen- gaming is currently using technology down the path of restricting the use of ate Judiciary Committee in June of to link games, but either have com- the Internet for any particular lawful this year and began discussions on how pacts which do not specifically author- purpose. Once we have prohibited gam- best to address currently-legal Indian ize networked games, or that do au- bling on the Internet, what will be the gaming in S. 692. My main concerns thorize these games, but do not contain next on-line activity that we will try
VerDate 29-OCT-99 04:51 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.007 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 S14870 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 19, 1999 to ban? We need to be very careful not Bodily Harm, Georgia Home Boy, Scoop) has in a drug product for which an application to create a precedent that might stifle become a significant and growing problem in has been approved under section 505 of the the commercial and educational devel- law enforcement. At least 20 States have Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.’’; and scheduled such drug in their drug laws and ø(4) by inserting after (4) (as so redesig- opment of this very exciting techno- law enforcement officials have been experi- nated) the following: logical tool with unhealthy implica- encing an increased presence of the drug in ø‘‘(5) Ketamine and its salts, isomers, and tions for the First Amendment. I fear driving under the influence, sexual assault, salts of isomers.’’. that this bill starts us down a road in and overdose cases especially at night clubs ø(c) ADDITIONAL LIST I CHEMICAL.—Section that direction. and parties. 102(34) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 Mr. President, in light of the ex- (2) A behavioral depressant and a hypnotic, U.S.C. 802(34)) is amended— pressed sentiment of this body last gamma hydroxybutyric acid (‘‘GHB’’) is ø(1) by redesignating subparagraph (X) as subparagraph (Y); and year, I did not object to the unanimous being used in conjunction with alcohol and other drugs with detrimental effects in an ø(2) by inserting after subparagraph (W) consent request to pass this bill in the increasing number of cases. It is difficult to the following subparagraph: closing days of this session, but I would isolate the impact of such drug’s ingestion ø‘‘(X) Gamma butyrolactone.’’. like the record to reflect my con- since it is so typically taken with an ever- ø(d) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION REGARDING tinuing opposition to this bill. changing array of other drugs and especially CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE ANALOGUES.—Sec- Thank you. I yield the floor. alcohol which potentiates its impact. tion 102(32) of the Controlled Substances Act Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I ask (3) GHB takes the same path as alcohol, (21 U.S.C. 802(32)) is amended— processes via alcohol dehydrogenase, and its ø(1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘sub- unanimous consent that the amend- paragraph (B)’’ and inserting ‘‘subparagraph ments be agreed to, the substitute symptoms at high levels of intake and as im- pact builds are comparable to alcohol inges- (C)’’; amendment be agreed to, as amended, tion/intoxication. Thus, aggression and vio- ø(2) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as the bill be read the third time and lence can be expected in some individuals subparagraph (C); and passed, the motion to reconsider be who use such drug. ø(3) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the laid upon the table, and that any state- (4) If taken for human consumption, com- following new subparagraph (B): ments relating to the bill be printed in mon industrial chemicals such as gamma bu- ø‘‘(B) The designation of gamma butyro- tyrolactone and 1.4-butanediol are swiftly lactone or any other chemical as a listed the RECORD. chemical pursuant to paragraph (34) or (35) The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without converted by the body into GHB. Illicit use of these and other GHB analogues and pre- does not preclude a finding pursuant to sub- objection, it is so ordered. cursor chemicals is a significant and growing paragraph (A) that the chemical is a con- The amendment (No. 2783) was agreed law enforcement problem. trolled substance analogue.’’. (e) PENALTIES REGARDING SCHEDULE I.— to. (5) A human pharmaceutical formulation ø (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 401(b)(1)(C) of the The amendment (No. 2782) was agreed of gamma hydroxybutyric acid is being de- ø Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. veloped as a treatment for cataplexy, a seri- to. 841(b)(1)(C)) is amended in the first sentence ous and debilitating disease. Cataplexy, The committee amendment in the by inserting after ‘‘schedule I or II,’’ the fol- which causes sudden and total loss of muscle nature of a substitute, as amended, was lowing: ‘‘gamma hydroxybutyric acid in control, affects about 65 percent of the esti- agreed to. schedule III,’’. mated 180,000 Americans with narcolepsy, a (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section The bill (S. 692), as amended, was sleep disorder. People with cataplexy often ø 401(b)(1)(D) of the Controlled Substances Act read the third time and passed, as fol- are unable to work, drive a car, hold their (21 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)(D)) is amended by insert- lows: children or live a normal life. [The bill was not available for print- (6) Abuse of illicit GHB is an imminent hazard ing ‘‘(other than gamma hydroxybutyric to public safety that requires immediate regu- acid)’’ after ‘‘schedule III’’. ing. It will appear in a future edition of (f) DISTRIBUTION WITH INTENT TO COMMIT latory action under the Controlled Substances ø the RECORD.] CRIME OF VIOLENCE.—Section 401(b)(7)(A) of Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.). f the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. øSEC. 3. ADDITION OF GAMMA HYDROXYBUTYRIC 841(b)(7)(A)) is amended by inserting ‘‘or con- DATE-RAPE DRUG CONTROL ACT ACID AND KETAMINE TO SCHED- ULES OF CONTROLLED SUB- trolled substance analogue’’ after ‘‘distrib- OF 1999 STANCES; GAMMA BUTYROLACTONE uting a controlled substance’’.¿ Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I ask AS ADDITIONAL LIST I CHEMICAL. SEC. 3. EMERGENCY SCHEDULING OF GAMMA HY- ø(a) ADDITION TO SCHEDULE I.— DROXYBUTYRIC ACID AND LISTING unanimous consent that the Senate OF GAMMA BUTYROLACTONE AS proceed to the consideration of Cal- ø(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 202(c) of the Con- trolled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812(c)) is LIST I CHEMICAL. endar No. 416, S. 1561. amended by adding at the end of schedule I (a) EMERGENCY SCHEDULING OF GHB.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Congress finds that the The PRESIDING OFFICER. The the following: clerk will report the bill by title. ø‘‘(d) Unless specifically excepted or unless abuse of illicit gamma hydroxybutyric acid is an The legislative clerk read as follows: listed in another schedule, any material, imminent hazard to the public safety. Accord- compound, mixture, or preparation, which ingly, the Attorney General, notwithstanding A bill to amend the Controlled Substance sections 201(a), 201(b), 201(c), and 202 of the Act to add gamma hydroxybutyric acid and contains any quantity of the following sub- stance having a depressant effect on the cen- Controlled Substances Act, shall issue, not later ketamine to the schedules of control sub- than 60 days after the date of the enactment of stances, to provide for a national awareness tral nervous system, or which contains any of their salts, isomers, and salts of isomers this Act, a final order that schedules such drug campaign, and for other purposes. whenever the existence of such salts, iso- (together with its salts, isomers, and salts of iso- There being no objection, the Senate mers, and salts of isomers is possible within mers) in the same schedule under section 202(c) proceeded to consider the bill which the specific chemical designation: of the Controlled Substances Act as would apply had been reported from the Committee ø‘‘(1) Gamma hydroxybutyric acid.’’. to a scheduling of a substance by the Attorney on the Judiciary, with amendments as ø(2) SECURITY OF FACILITIES.—For purposes General under section 201(h)(1) of such Act (re- follows: of any requirements that relate to the phys- lating to imminent hazards to the public safety), except as follows: [Matter proposed to be deleted is en- ical security of registered manufacturers and registered distributors, gamma hydroxy- (A) For purposes of any requirements that re- closed in black brackets; new matter is butyric acid and its salts, isomers, and salts late to the physical security of registered manu- printed in italic.] of isomers manufactured, distributed, or pos- facturers and registered distributors, the final S. 1516 sessed in accordance with an exemption ap- order shall treat such drug, when the drug is Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Rep- proved under section 505(i) of the Federal manufactured, distributed, or possessed in ac- resentatives of the United States of America in Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act shall be treat- cordance with an exemption under section 505(i) Congress assembled, ed as a controlled substance in schedule III of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (whether the exemption involved is authorized øSECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. under section 202(c) of the Controlled Sub- stances Act. before, on, or after the date of the enactment of øThis Act may be cited as the ‘‘Date-Rape ø(b) ADDITION TO SCHEDULE III.—Schedule this Act), as being in the same schedule as that Drug Control Act of 1999’’. ¿ III under section 202(c) of the Controlled recommended by the Secretary of Health and SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812(c)) is amended Human Services for the drug when the drug is This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hillory J. in (b)— the subject of an authorized investigational new Farias and Samantha Reid Date-Rape Drug ø(1) by redesignating (4) through (10) as (6) drug application (relating to such section Prohibition Act of 1999’’. through (12), respectively; and 505(i)). The recommendation referred to in the SEC. 2. FINDINGS. ø(2) by redesignating (3) as (4); preceding sentence is contained in the first Congress finds as follows: ø(3) by inserting after (2) the following: paragraph of the letter transmitted on May 19, (1) Gamma hydroxybutyric acid (also ø‘‘(3) Gamma hydroxybutyric acid and its 1999, by such Secretary (acting through the As- called G, Liquid X, Liquid Ecstasy, Grievous salts, isomers, and salts of isomers contained sistant Secretary for Health) to the Attorney
VerDate 29-OCT-99 04:51 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 6333 E:\CR\FM\G19NO6.114 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S14871 General (acting through the Deputy Adminis- may, in addition to any other requirements clude a finding pursuant to subparagraph (A) of trator of the Drug Enforcement Administration), that apply under this section with respect to this paragraph that the chemical is a controlled which letter was in response to the letter trans- such a drug product, establish any of the fol- substance analogue.’’. mitted by the Attorney General (acting through lowing as reporting requirements: (b) DISTRIBUTION WITH INTENT TO COMMIT such Deputy Administrator) on September 16, ‘‘(1) That every person who is registered as CRIME OF VIOLENCE.—Section 401(b)(7)(A) of the 1997. In publishing the final order in the Fed- a manufacturer of bulk or dosage form, as a Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. eral Register, the Attorney General shall publish packager, repackager, labeler, relabeler, or 841(b)(7)(A)) is amended by inserting ‘‘or con- a copy of the letter that was transmitted by the distributor shall report acquisition and dis- trolled substance analogue’’ after ‘‘distributing Secretary of Health and Human Services. tribution transactions quarterly, not later a controlled substance’’. (B) In the case of gamma hydroxybutyric acid than the 15th day of the month succeeding SEC. 6. DEVELOPMENT OF MODEL PROTOCOLS, that is contained in a drug product for which the quarter for which the report is sub- TRAINING MATERIALS, FORENSIC an application is approved under section 505 of mitted, and annually report end-of-year in- FIELD TESTS, AND COORDINATION the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act ventories. MECHANISM FOR INVESTIGATIONS (whether the application involved is approved AND PROSECUTIONS RELATING TO ‘‘(2) That all annual inventory reports GAMMA HYDROXYBUTYRIC ACID, before, on, or after the date of the enactment of shall be filed no later than January 15 of the OTHER CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES, this Act), the final order shall schedule such year following that for which the report is AND DESIGNER DRUGS. drug in the same schedule as that recommended submitted and include data on the stocks of (a) IN GENERAL.— The Attorney General, in by the Secretary of Health and Human Services the drug product, drug substance, bulk drug, consultation with the Administrator of the Drug for authorized formulations of the drug. The and dosage forms on hand as of the close of Enforcement Administration and the Director of recommendation referred to in the preceding business December 31, indicating whether the Federal Bureau of Investigation, shall— sentence is contained in the last sentence of the materials reported are in storage or in proc- (1) develop— fourth paragraph of the letter referred to in sub- ess of manufacturing. (A) model protocols for the collection of toxi- paragraph (A) with respect to May 19, 1999. ‘‘(3) That every person who is registered as cology specimens and the taking of victim state- (2) FAILURE TO ISSUE ORDER.—If the final a manufacturer of bulk or dosage form shall ments in connection with investigations into order is not issued within the period specified in report all manufacturing transactions both and prosecutions related to possible violations of paragraph (1), gamma hydroxybutyric acid (to- inventory increases, including purchases, the Controlled Substances Act or other Federal gether with its salts, isomers, and salts of iso- transfers, and returns, and reductions from or State laws that result in or contribute to mers) is deemed to be scheduled under section inventory, including sales, transfers, theft, rape, other crimes of violence, or other crimes 202(c) of the Controlled Substances Act in ac- destruction, and seizure, and shall provide involving abuse of gamma hydroxybutyric acid, cordance with the policies described in para- data on material manufactured, manufac- other controlled substances, or so-called ‘‘de- graph (1), as if the Attorney General had issued tured from other material, use in manufac- signer drugs’’; and a final order in accordance with such para- turing other material, and use in manufac- (B) model training materials for law enforce- graph. turing dosage forms. ment personnel involved in such investigations; (b) ADDITIONAL PENALTIES RELATING TO ‘‘(4) That all reports under this section and GHB.— must include the registered person’s reg- (2) make such protocols and training materials (1) CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT.— istration number as well as the registration available to Federal, State, and local personnel (A) IN GENERAL.—Section 401(b)(1)(C) of the numbers, names, and other identifying infor- responsible for such investigations. Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. mation of vendors, suppliers, and customers, (b) GRANT.— 841(b)(1)(C)) is amended in the first sentence by sufficient to allow the Attorney General to (1) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General shall inserting after ‘‘schedule I or II,’’ the following: track the receipt and distribution of the make a grant, in such amount and to such pub- ‘‘gamma hydroxybutyric acid (including when drug. lic or private person or entity as the Attorney scheduled as an approved drug product for pur- ‘‘(5) That each dispensing practitioner General considers appropriate, for the develop- poses of section 3(a)(1)(B) of the Hillory J. shall maintain for each prescription the ment of forensic field tests to assist law enforce- Farias and Samantha Reid Date-Rape Drug name of the prescribing practitioner, the ment officials in detecting the presence of Prohibition Act of 1999),’’. prescribing practitioner’s Federal and State gamma hydroxybutyric acid and related sub- (B) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section registration numbers, with the expiration stances. 401(b)(1)(D) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 dates of these registrations, verification that (2) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— U.S.C. 841(b)(1)(D)) is amended by striking ‘‘, or the prescribing practitioner possesses the ap- There are authorized to be appropriated such 30’’ and inserting ‘‘(other than gamma hydroxy- propriate registration to prescribe this con- sums as may be necessary to carry out this sub- butyric acid), or 30’’. trolled substance, the patient’s name and ad- section. (2) CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES IMPORT AND EX- dress, the name of the patient’s insurance (c) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the PORT ACT.— provider and documentation by a medical date of the enactment of this Act, the Attorney (A) IN GENERAL.—Section 1010(b)(3) of the practitioner licensed and registered to pre- General shall submit to the Committees on the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act scribe the drug of the patient’s medical need Judiciary of the Senate and House of Represent- (21 U.S.C. 960(b)(3)) is amended in the first sen- for the drug. Such information shall be atives a report on current mechanisms for co- tence by inserting after ‘‘I or II,’’ the following: available for inspection and copying by the ordinating Federal, State, and local investiga- ‘‘gamma hydroxybutyric acid (including when Attorney General. tions into and prosecutions related to possible scheduled as an approved drug product for pur- ‘‘(6) That section 310(b)(3) (relating to mail violations of the Controlled Substances Act or poses of section 3(a)(1)(B) of the Hillory J. order reporting) applies with respect to other Federal or State laws that result in or Farias and Samantha Reid Date-Rape Drug gamma hydroxybutyric acid to the same ex- contribute to rape, other crimes of violence, or Prohibition Act of 1999),’’. tent and in the same manner as such section other crimes involving the abuse of gamma hy- (B) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section applies with respect to the chemicals and droxybutyric acid, other controlled substances, 1010(b)(4) of the Controlled Substances Import drug products specified in subparagraph or so-called ‘‘designer drugs’’. The report shall and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 960(b)(4)) is amended (A)(i) of such section.’’. also include recommendations for the improve- by striking ‘‘flunitrazepam)’’ and inserting the ment of such mechanisms. following: ‘‘flunitrazepam and except a viola- øSEC. 5. DEVELOPMENT OF FORENSIC FIELD TESTS FOR GAMMA HYDROXY- øSEC. 6. ANNUAL REPORT REGARDING DATE- tion involving gamma hydroxybutyric acid)’’. BUTYRIC ACID. RAPE DRUGS; NATIONAL AWARE- (c) GAMMA BUTYROLACTONE AS ADDITIONAL NESS CAMPAIGN.¿ øThe Attorney General shall make a grant LIST I CHEMICAL.—Section 102(34) of the Con- for the development of forensic field tests to SEC. 7. ANNUAL REPORT REGARDING DATE-RAPE trolled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802(34)) is DRUGS; NATIONAL AWARENESS CAM- assist law enforcement officials in detecting PAIGN. amended— the presence of gamma hydroxybutyric acid (1) by redesignating subparagraph (X) as sub- (a) ANNUAL REPORT.—The Secretary of and related substances.¿ paragraph (Y); and Health and Human Services (in this section (2) by inserting after subparagraph (W) the SEC. 5. CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ANALOGUES. referred to as the ‘‘Secretary’’) shall periodi- following subparagraph: (a) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION REGARDING CON- cally submit to Congress reports each of ‘‘(X) Gamma butyrolactone.’’. TROLLED SUBSTANCE ANALOGUES.—Section which provides an estimate of the number of SEC. 4. AUTHORITY FOR ADDITIONAL REPORT- 102(32) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 incidents of the abuse of date-rape drugs (as ING REQUIREMENTS FOR GAMMA U.S.C. 802(32)) is amended— defined in subsection (c)) that occurred dur- HYDROXYBUTYRIC PRODUCTS IN (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘sub- ing the most recent one-year period for SCHEDULE III. paragraph (B)’’ and inserting ‘‘subparagraph which data are available. The first such re- Section 307 of the Controlled Substances (C)’’; port shall be submitted not later than Janu- Act (21 U.S.C. 827) is amended by adding at (2) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as sub- ary 15, 2000, and subsequent reports shall be the end the following: paragraph (C); and submitted annually thereafter. ‘‘(h) In the case of a drug product con- (3) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the (b) NATIONAL AWARENESS CAMPAIGN.— taining gamma hydroxybutyric acid for following new subparagraph (B): (1) DEVELOPMENT OF PLAN; RECOMMENDA- which an application has been approved ‘‘(B) The designation of gamma butyrolactone TIONS OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE.— under section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, or any other chemical as a listed chemical pur- (A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary, in con- and Cosmetic Act, the Attorney General suant to paragraph (34) or (35) does not pre- sultation with the Attorney General, shall
VerDate 29-OCT-99 04:51 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.013 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 S14872 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 19, 1999
develop a plan for carrying out a national (2) TREATMENT OF REPORT.—Nothing in para- Michigan, Mr. ABRAHAM, who has been campaign to educate individuals described in graph (1) may be construed to prohibit the At- a real leader on this bill, for any com- subparagraph (B) on the following: torney General or the Administrator of the Drug ments he might have. (i) The dangers of date-rape drugs. Enforcement Administration from making any The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Sen- (ii) The applicability of the Controlled reallocation of existing resources that the Attor- Substances Act to such drugs, including pen- ator from Michigan is recognized. ney General or the Administrator, as the case Mr. ABRAHAM. Mr. President, I alties under such Act. may be, considers appropriate. wanted to make a few comments about (iii) Recognizing the symptoms that indi- SEC. 9. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT. cate an individual may be a victim of such Section 401 of the Controlled Substances Act the legislation we are about to pass. drugs, including symptoms with respect to (21 U.S.C. 841) is amended by redesignating sub- Before I do so, I would like to thank a sexual assault. sections (d), (e), (f), and (g) as subsections (c), number of people for their help in this (iv) Appropriately responding when an in- (d), (e), and (f), respectively. effort. dividual has such symptoms. Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘An Act to First, I would like to thank my col- (B) INTENDED POPULATION.—The individuals amend the Controlled Substances Act to di- leagues who cosponsored this legisla- referred to in subparagraph (A) are young rect the emergency scheduling of gamma hy- tion: Senators FEINSTEIN, LIEBERMAN, adults, youths, law enforcement personnel, droxybutyric acid, to provide for a national DEWINE, GRASSLEY, COVERDELL, and educators, school nurses, counselors of rape awareness campaign, and for other pur- victims, and emergency room personnel in poses.’’. GRAHAM. Their support was crucial to hospitals. moving forward with this bill and AMENDMENT NO. 2784 (C) ADVISORY COMMITTEE.—Not later than doing so in a timely fashion. Second, I (Purpose: To modify the short title) 180 days after the date of the enactment of would like to thank Senator HATCH, his Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I send this Act, the Secretary shall establish an ad- Judiciary Chief Counsel Manus Cooney, an amendment to the desk and ask for visory committee to make recommendations his Deputy Chief Counsel Sharon Prost, to the Secretary regarding the plan under its immediate consideration. his Chief of Staff Patricia Knight, and subparagraph (A). The committee shall be The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Bruce Artim and Pattie DeLoatche, all composed of individuals who collectively clerk will report. possess expertise on the effects of date-rape The legislative clerk read as follows: of whose commitment to seeing this ef- drugs and on detecting and controlling the fort through to fruition I appreciate The Senator from Maine [Ms. COLLINS], for drugs. Mrs. HUTCHISON, proposes an amendment both for the advice and guidance they (2) IMPLEMENTATION OF PLAN.—Not later numbered 2784. provided and as the act of friendship I than 180 days after the date on which the ad- recognize it to be. Third, I would like visory committee under paragraph (1) is es- Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I ask tablished, the Secretary, in consultation unanimous consent that reading of the to thank Senator BIDEN and his staff, with the Attorney General, shall commence amendment be dispensed with. especially Marcia Lee, whose assist- carrying out the national campaign under The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without ance and cooperation in working out a such paragraph in accordance with the plan objection, it is so ordered. final version of this bill acceptable to developed under such paragraph. The cam- The amendment is as follows: all involved, including the Administra- paign may be carried out directly by the Sec- On page 1, beginning on line 4, strike tion, was indispensable. I would also retary and through grants and contracts. ‘‘Samantha Reid and Hillory J. Farias’’ and like to thank my good friend Fred (3) EVALUATION BY GENERAL ACCOUNTING OF- insert ‘‘Hillory J. Farias and Samantha Upton, who first brought the serious FICE.—Not later than two years after the Reid’’. problem that is the focus of this legis- date on which the national campaign under On page 6, line 21, strike ‘‘Samantha Reid paragraph (1) is commenced, the Comptroller lation to my attention, and Congress- and Hillory J. Farias’’ and insert ‘‘Hillory J. man BLILEY and his able staff, espe- General of the United States shall submit to Farias and Samantha Reid’’. Congress an evaluation of the effects with re- On page 7, line 12, strike ‘‘Samantha Reid cially John Manthei, who patiently tol- spect to date-rape drugs of the national cam- and Hillory J. Farias’’ and insert ‘‘Hillory J. erated and assisted with the vagaries of paign. Farias and Samantha Reid’’. bicameral legislative drafting. Finally, (c) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this sec- I would like to thank my own staff, es- tion, the term ‘‘date-rape drugs’’ means Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I ask gamma hydroxybutyric acid and its salts, unanimous consent that the amend- pecially my Subcommittee General isomers, and salts of isomers and such other ment be agreed to, the committee Counsel Chase Hutto, who worked tire- drugs or substances as the Secretary, after amendment, as amended, be agreed to, lessly and creatively on this effort, and consultation with the Attorney General, de- and the bill be read the third time. I Lee Otis, my Subcommittee Chief termines to be appropriate. further ask unanimous consent that Counsel. SEC. 8. SPECIAL UNIT IN DRUG ENFORCEMENT the Senate proceed to the consider- S. 1561, and its counterpart, H.R. 2130, ADMINISTRATION FOR ASSESSMENT are named for a young woman by the OF ABUSE AND TRAFFICKING OF ation of the House companion bill, H.R. GHB AND OTHER CONTROLLED SUB- 2130, all after the enacting clause be name of Samantha Reid. Samantha STANCES AND DRUGS. stricken and the text of S. 1561, as was born in the Henry Ford Hospital in (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 60 days Detroit on January 2, 1984. She grew up after the date of the enactment of this Act, the amended, be inserted in lieu thereof. I further ask that the bill be read the in Lincoln Park. She played trumpet in Attorney General shall establish within the Op- her elementary school band. She was a erations Division of the Drug Enforcement Ad- third time and passed, the motion to ministration a special unit which shall assess reconsider be laid upon the table, the girl scout for eight years, with the help the abuse of and trafficking in gamma hydroxy- amendment to the title be agreed to, of her mother, Judi Clark, who was a butyric acid, flunitrazepam, ketamine, other and that any statements relating to troop leader. She was an ‘‘all star’’ 6th grade baseball player. She went on to controlled substances, and other so-called ‘‘de- the bill be printed in the RECORD. Fi- signer drugs’’ whose use has been associated nally, I ask that S. 1561 be placed back attend Carlson High School in Gibral- with sexual assault. tar, where she played freshman basket- (b) PARTICULAR DUTIES.—In carrying out the on the calendar. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without ball. Her favorite restaurant was assessment under subsection (a), the special unit McDonald’s, and her favorite meal shall— objection, it is so ordered. (1) examine the threat posed by the substances The amendment (No. 2784) was agreed there was a Big Mac. She loved to go to and drugs referred to in that subsection on a to. Cedar Point Amusement Park, and got national basis and regional basis; and The committee amendments, as mad if she couldn’t go at least twice a (2) make recommendations to the Attorney amended, were agreed to. year. She earned her spending money General regarding allocations and reallocations The bill (H.R. 2130), as amended, was by helping around the house with of resources in order to address the threat. chores and babysitting, and indeed, on (c) REPORT ON RECOMMENDATIONS.— read the third time and passed. (1) REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 180 days The title was amended so as to read: February 11, 1995, she earned an award after the date of the enactment of this Act, the ‘‘An Act to amend the Controlled for outstanding performance in com- Attorney General shall submit to the Committees Substances Act to direct the emer- pleting babysitting training from the on the Judiciary of the Senate and House of gency scheduling of gamma hydroxy- City of Lincoln Park. Her mother Representatives a report which shall— butyric acid, to provide for a national called her ‘‘Hammy Sammy’’ because (A) set forth the recommendations of the spe- of the way she always smiled in pic- cial unit under subsection (b)(2): and awareness campaign, and for other pur- (B) specify the allocations and reallocations poses.’’ tures. Her older brother Charles Reid, of resources that the Attorney General proposes Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I yield who is 18, remembers and misses her to make in response to the recommendations. to the distinguished Senator from loud voice.
VerDate 29-OCT-99 04:51 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.013 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S14873 On January 17, 1999, Samantha died a Schedule I or II, which would carry the This legislation also addresses three few weeks after turning 15. She and most serious penalties for illicit sale, other major problems society has had two friends, none of them yet 16, were because the security requirements that in responding to the threat posed by at a party given by a 25 year-old man would accompany such scheduling this drug. First, it would require the in Woodhaven, Michigan. Samantha would interfere with this medical re- Attorney General to develop, and make Reid drank a Mountain Dew—a soft search. On the other hand, the DEA has available to Federal, State, and local drink—and passed out within minutes. been understandably reluctant to agree authorities, model protocols for taking She vomited in her sleep, and she died. to any lesser scheduling, because the toxicology specimens and victim state- Her friend, Melanie Sindone, also 15, result would be lower penalties for the ments in connection with suspected passed out as well. Melanie lapsed into unauthorized sale and distribution of crimes involving GHB and other con- a coma, but she has survived. this drug. Moreover, under the Con- trolled substances or so-called designer These two girls had no reason to be- trolled Substances Act, the fact that drugs. The Attorney General also lieve that they were drinking anything GHB is under investigation for possible would be required to provide training dangerous. But they were wrong. Their medical use precludes the Attorney materials for law enforcement officials drinks had been laced with the drug General from using her emergency au- responsible for investigating these of- GHB, commonly known as a ‘‘date rape thority to schedule it as an ‘‘imminent fenses. And finally, she would be di- drug.’’ Samantha was undoubtedly hazard to the public safety.’’ rected to make a grant for the develop- slipped it for the purpose that this The result has been an administra- name suggests, although she died be- tive deadlock that has resulted in a ment of standardized tests that could fore that purpose was accomplished. complete failure to schedule GHB at be used in the field to test for the pres- Mr. President, GHB and its analogues all. Hence legislative intervention is ence of these drugs. are becoming increasingly common in needed. The reason for these requirements is our nation. They are finding their way This legislation has been drafted as a that even many in law enforcement are into nightclubs, onto campuses and specific response to these various com- unfamiliar with the operation of GHB. into homes. They are being used by peting considerations, which the cur- As a result, they may defer testing for sexual predators against young—some- rent scheduling categories are not all it or taking victim statements on the times very young—women. Their un- that well suited to handle in any event. mistaken assumption that the victim witting victims may be raped, become Notwithstanding the current investiga- is drunk and will be more coherent violently ill, and even die. tional medical use, the legislation de- later, whereas in fact this drug can be GHB is especially dangerous because termines that GHB is an imminent haz- processed very quickly by the body and it is relatively easy to produce. Accord- ard to public safety. It therefore di- no longer be detectable at that time. ing to the DEA, the clandestine syn- rects the Attorney General to place it Moreover, the victim’s memory may be thesis involves the use of two common, on the schedule on which imminent impaired by the substance and she may non-regulated chemicals: gamma-bu- hazards are ordinarily placed, which is forget events that she would have re- tyrolactone (GBL), the primary pre- Schedule I. It relaxes the physical se- membered had her statement been cursor chemical, and sodium hydroxide curity requirements that would ordi- taken more quickly. Hence the need for (lye). GBL is a solvent with a wide narily apply to Schedule I substances model protocols, training, and tests. range of industrial uses. Tens of thou- for the investigational medical uses of sands of metric tons are produced an- the drug, however, following the rec- Second, the legislation directs the nually and it is readily available from ommendation of the Secretary of HHS Secretary of HHS to conduct a Na- chemical supply companies. The syn- on what is appropriate in that area and tional Awareness Campaign about the thesis is a simple one-pot method re- thereby avoiding interfering with the dangers of GHB. Consciousness of the quiring no special chemical expertise. ongoing research. It also makes clear dangers of this drug is lagging far be- In addition, kits for making GHB con- that should this research pay off with a hind the threat the drug presents, and taining GBL and sodium hydroxide are drug that the FDA approves because it it is critical that we make it a national being sold on the Internet. GBL, once concludes that it can responsibly be priority to remedy that problem. absorbed from the gastrointestinal prescribed to treat narcolepsy, Finally, the legislation would direct tract after oral administration, is read- cataplexy, or other diseases, the FDA the Attorney General to examine and ily converted to GHB in the body and approved drug will be classified as a recommend improvements to current produces the same profile of physio- Schedule III drug, although the Attor- mechanisms for coordinating federal, logical and behavioral effects as GHB. ney General can impose additional state and local investigations and pros- The combination of the ease with record keeping requirements to help ecutions in this area. And it would es- which GHB can be produced and wide- assure that it is not diverted to im- tablish a special unit within the DEA spread ignorance about GHB’s dangers proper uses. Finally, anyone involved to assess the federal response to the especially among our nation’s youth in selling or distributing the diverted abuse and trafficking of GHB, other has led the law enforcement commu- product will be subject to the same controlled substances, and other de- nity to view GHB as a serious and tough ‘‘Schedule I’’ penalties that signer drugs associated with sexual as- growing threat. apply to the sale or distribution of the sault, recommended any reallocations The Controlled Substances Act pro- illicit or unapproved drug. of enforcement resources necessary to vides an administrative mechanism for In practice, this means that while improve that response, and direct the the Attorney General, in consultation medical research will continue unham- Attorney General to make any such re- with the Secretary of HHS, to place pered by the most cumbersome con- allocations she believes are appro- dangerous substances susceptible of sequences of placing this drug in priate. abuse on a ‘‘schedule’’ of controlled Schedule I, the harsh penalties pro- substances, thereby restricting access vided for the sale, manufacture, and It is time to act, Mr. President, to to them and imposing criminal pen- distribution of all Schedule I sub- save young people, and young women alties for their illicit sale and manu- stances will apply to any and all illicit in particular, from these deadly drugs facture. The Attorney General and the trafficking in GHB, whether the drug and the predators who use them. Secretary are in agreement that GHB originated in a bathtub or a medical fa- I ask my colleagues to give their full should in fact be scheduled, but they cility. This means that traffickers will support to this amendment. are in disagreement over which sched- be subject to a 20 year statutory max- ule it should be placed on. This is be- imum for distributing this drug, and I also ask unanimous consent that a cause GHB is currently under inves- that if, as in the case of Samantha number of letters from families and tigational use as a means of treating Reid, the drug is slipped to someone victims of date-rape drugs be printed in narcolepsy and cataplexy, afflictions who dies, or if it is slipped to someone the RECORD. affecting about 70,000 Americans, and who is raped or suffers serious bodily There being no objection, the letters HHS has been understandably reluc- injury, that 20 year maximum become were ordered to be printed in the tant to agree that GHB belongs on a 20 year minimum. RECORD, as follows:
VerDate 29-OCT-99 05:07 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.025 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 S14874 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 19, 1999
TRINKA D. PORRATA, DESIGNER hadn’t known to report it to anyone. Dr. Jim will only skyrocket as doctors blatantly DRUGS—TEACHING & CONSULTING, Tolliver, who was at that time tracking GHB abuse the controversial, dangerous ‘‘off label Pasadena, CA, October 3, 1999. information for the DEA, began to make in- use’’ policy that would enable them to pre- Senator SPENCER ABRAHAM, quiries around the country, and the death scribe it for anything, not just the combina- 329 Dirksen Senate Office Building, count rapidly jumped to 26. The death toll tion of narcolepsy and cataplexy of which it Washington, DC. continued to slowly increase, based on word is being researched. There is simply no DEAR SENATOR ABRAHAM: I’m writing in of mouth, followed by the DEA obtaining a mechanism in place that will prevent such support of Senate Bill 1561. For four years, copy of the autopsy to review before includ- abuse (there is plenty of evidence of abuse of my life has revolved around a world of drug ing each death in the tally. Still, there was other drugs because of this policy). And, I abuse little known by law enforcement, med- no reporting mechanism, no blanket means cannot imagine in my wildest dreams a com- ical personnel, politicians and parents. I’ve of obtaining information. Despite DEA poll- pany saying, ‘‘Oh excuse me, we are making watched MDMA explode worldwide in the ing its offices, where knowledge of this drug too much money!!!!’’ If the Legislature is de- rave, college and club scenes. I’ve seen was limited by DEA agents and local au- termined to deal with future issues, then I flunitrazepam (Rohypnol, aka roofies) make thorities, it was obvious that not all cases adamantly urge that this drug be specifically its mark on sexual assaults. I’ve seen LSD were being spotted. I have personally worked excluded from the ‘‘off label use’’ policy. Any resurface. And, I’ve watched in horror as the closely with Dr. Chris Sannerud, who is now use of GHB beyond narcolepsy/cataplexy drug gamma hydroxy butyrate (GHB) has tracking GHB data for the DEA, and have re- would require its own proper research and marched coast to coast, plucking out young ferred numerous leads about deaths to her development. If, as the drug company claims, lives in its path, picking up momentum as it for investigation. their only interest is for narcolepsy/ goes. I consider it simply the most dangerous The count recently jumped to 49. I would cataplexy patients, then there is simply no drug I’ve encountered in 25 years as a police like to point out to you that of the 49, ten reason they would protest such a clause officer. This is because of the overwhelming have been in 1999. Furthermore, 25 additional being included. amount of misinformation spread about cases have come to light, all but one of them There is much work to be done on this drug GHB, the dramatic lack of real scientific in 1999. These cases are now being reviewed. in all arenas. The dangers of GHB need to knowledge of it,the difficulty in testing for That would mean more than 30 in 1999 to made crystal clear to America’s youth and it and recognizing it in the street, and how date. The victims get younger. More of them parents. Law enforcement, prosecutors and easily and unpredictably it kills. GHB is in- involve GHB and its analogs only (no alcohol medical personnel are not uniformly pre- deed the Bad Child of the Internet. And, it or other drugs). I receive leads on GHB re- pared to handle cases involving GHB. GHB has forever change the face of sexual assault lated death and rape cases virtually daily. has brought to the sexual assault investiga- investigations. And, we have only scratched the surface at tion a unbelievably challenge to overcome Despite a world brimming with technology this point. Law enforcement, legislators, and an added horror for rape victims that I and communication devices, knowledge of doctors and parents are still largely unfa- cannot even begin to address in this docu- this drug has been based primarily on infor- miliar with GHB. Remember too, these fig- ment. As a start, we need to standardize all mation via the Internet that runs the gamut ures do not reflect the victims of impaired sexual assault medical kits nationwide to in- from outdated to totally false. Any drug drivers under the influence of GHB. clude urine samples from victims and up- Meanwhile, the drug company and the pro- abuser or drug pusher can go on the Internet grade investigative and testing procedures. drug abuse element want to divert attention and pump out volumes of lies and half truths Changes need to be made in the impaired saying that it is the homebrew aspect of driving world as well. Aggressive federal/ unabated. There are thousands of websites GHB that is the problem and that it is only state prosecution is needed against manufac- claiming GHB to be the wonder drug that dangerous with alcohol and other drugs. The turers and distributors of GHB and analogs. will cure anything you can think of and in- homebrew aspect occasionally adds an extra The GHB death toll speaks for itself. Legis- structing everyone NOT to call 911 for the element of burns from high pH levels. But lation and strong federal backing for edu- victim of a GHB overdose. Deadly advice in- that isn’t the problem. It is GHB that im- cation and enforcement is clearly overdue deed. Meanwhile, government, law enforce- pairs, resulting in dangerous users behind and urgently needed. ment and the medical world have failed to the wheel causing accidents and deaths and Sincerely, make significant gain in countering the resulting in victims unable to protect them- TRINKA D. PORRATA, flood of bad information, identifying and selves from sexual assault. Look beyond the Drug Consultant. making available accurate testing methods smoke and mirrors. The fact remains: 25- for it and providing even the most basic edu- year-olds don’t die from a .17 blood alcohol; To the members of the judiciary committee: cation about GHB. The ‘‘system’’ has truly Jeffery Fraga died that night BECAUSE he On Jan. 17, 1999 I lost my only daughter, failed the American public on this drug. As a took GHB. Samantha Reid was drinking a Samantha Reid, when GHB and/or GBL was friend of Samantha Reid, the 15-year-old Mountain Dew the night she died. And 20- slipped into her Mountain Dew soft drink. I Michigan victim of GHB, so aptly put it, year olds don’t die from sleeping face down knew nothing about GHB before this tragic ‘‘You tell us every day about marijuana and on a pillow . . . unless in coma from GHB in- event. I took six months off of work and other drugs. Why didn’t you tell us about gestion. Kyle Hagmann took it as a sleep aid began educating myself on GHB. The more I GHB?’’ Daily, I am asked by the families who (after reading on the Internet that it is ‘‘to- learn about this invisible predator the more have lost loved ones to GHB—‘‘I’ve never tally safe’’), not a recreational drug. It is concerned for our nations safety I become. heard of this drug. Why, why didn’t we know GHB that kills. I have joined Spencer Abraham on cam- about this drug?’’ Not nearly enough is known about this paigning to pass S. 1561. This bill is long Each day that GHB is not a federally con- drug from a medical and scientific view- overdue in our country and contains many trolled substance is another day of failure by point. The literature is old and outdated. positive programs for awareness and will the ‘‘system.’’ No, controlling a drug does New information is being learned daily and give law enforcement the much needed tools not solve the problem, but it allows addi- still not nearly enough is known. The old lit- necessary to prosecute GHB cases. S. 1561 tional resources to be plugged into the tasks erature says GHB is not addictive. We know will allow for education targeting teens who of educating the public, providing more this to be untrue. In fact, withdrawal from are now receiving false information on GHB. standardized information to law enforce- GHB addiction is life threatening. This is A nation wide awareness campaign will give ment, and developing testing procedures. It simply not a market-ready product—any many young ladies the information nec- would be a giant step toward stopping the drug that is leaving 13-year olds suffering essary to protect and ultimately save them- lies about GHB as a totally safe, wonder pulmonary edema in our nation’s hospitals selves from GHB. Parents can be reached drug. and alleys is not ready for market. One doc- through public service announcements giv- There isn’t a meaningful data collection tor with nine years of GHB research walked ing them the opportunity to communicate mechanism to capture drug trends like this. away from it, saying a much safer, longer the dangers of GHB to their children. Existing systems are cumbersome, far behind acting product is needed. One doctor cur- Samantha and I were not given the oppor- in reporting statistics, and non-responsive to rently researching GHB for narcolepsy first tunity that S. 1561 has to offer. Lets not wait for one more senseless death changing trends. In early 1997, the tally of told me personally that it was eight to ten before passing this legislation. Not one more GHB-related deaths kept by the Drug En- years away for being ready and changed his mother should have to water the grass of a forcement Administration was seven. We story only after claims were publicized that fresh grave, or place wind chimes on a ten- knew that there was no way to put a figure the supply would cease for research if it be- der, young tree planted to shade the site of on the possible number of deaths related to came a Schedule I drug. There is simply no their daughter. Pumpkins for Halloween GHB where neither law enforcement nor the reason to give concessions to future issues re should be carved at the kitchen table to- coroners knew to test for it. During our this drug. Let the research take its course gether, not placed by a headstone. hearings before the California Legislature, and determine the future. Other drugs have Our country is in desperate need of all the Dennis Fraga showed up on the witness list. been developed in Schedule I. I personally do good this bill has to offer. He arrived with autopsy report in hand, not believe it will be GHB, but a safer, longer Respectfully, showing that his 25-year-old son, Jeffery, had acting cousin that is yet to be developed. JUDI CLARK, died from alcohol and GHB ingestion. We re- Don’t let them bypass proper research and Rockwood, Michigan. alized that if we hadn’t known about this development!!!!! death, there were undoubtedly more where I have no doubt that if GHB is ever ap- Mr. ABRAHAM. Mr. President, I the coroner knew that GHB was involved but proved for narcolepsy, the horror of abuse would like to close by reading one of
VerDate 29-OCT-99 05:43 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.027 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S14875 those letters, the letter I received from Mr. HATCH. Mr. President, Today, from low-prevalence conditions. We Judi Clark, Samantha Reid’s mother, the Senate adopted a significant meas- need to do everything we can to get that, better than anything I can say, ure against date rape and other hei- academic researchers and the pharma- makes the case as to why this legisla- nous crimes associated with abusing ceutical industry to find cures for the tion is needed now. She wrote this let- certain types of drugs. I want to make hundreds of currently untreatable rare ter to the members of the Senate Judi- a few comments on this bill, S. 1561, diseases. ciary Committee. which addresses the abuse of the dan- The problem for policymakers, both It is as follows: gerous drug GHB which has been used in the Congress and at the DEA, is how To the Members of the Senate Judiciary Com- to commit date rape and other crimes. to encourage the use of the medically mittee: As Chairman of the Senate Judiciary promising uses of GHB while discour- On January 17, 1999, I lost my only daugh- Committee, I am proud that it was a aging and outlawing the illicit uses ter, Samantha Reid, when GHB and/or GBL member of our Committee, Senator such as date rape. was slipped into her Mountain Dew soft drink. I knew nothing about GHB before this SPENCER ABRAHAM, who introduced and While there are no known cases of di- tragic event. I took six months off of work has played the key leadership role in version of this drug from the on-going and began educating myself on GHB. The Senate passage of S. 1561, The and highly promising clinical trials of more I learned about this invisible predator Samantha Reid and Hillory J. Farias GHB as a treatment for cataplexy and the more concerned for our nations safety I Date Rape Prohibition Act of 1999.’’ I narcolepsy, the problem of GHB abuse become. am also proud that other members of demands our attention. I have joined Spencer Abraham on cam- the Judiciary Committee, Senators According to DEA, hospital and law paigning to pass S. 1561. This bill is long overdue in our country and contains many DEWINE, FEINSTEIN, and GRASSLEY have enforcement officials have reported positive programs for awareness, and will joined Senator ABRAHAM in co-spon- about 5,500 cases of GHB abuse, includ- give law enforcement the much needed tools soring this legislation. ing 49 deaths. Aggregate statistics, as necessary to prosecute GHB cases. S. 1561 It is only through the hard work and alarming as they may be, cannot con- will allow for education targeting teens who insistence of Senator ABRAHAM that vey the absolute upheaval that GHB are now receiving false information on GHB. this bill will pass the Senate today. I abuse can cause for an individual and a A nationwide awareness campaign will give also want to commend his able staff, family. many young ladies the information nec- Senator ABRAHAM has told me the essary to protect and ultimately save them- especially Lee Otis and Chase Hutto, selves from GHB. Parents can be reached who have spent considerable time and story about the untimely death of a through public service announcements giv- effort in improving this legislation. bright and vivacious 15-year-old young ing them the opportunity to communicate Their efforts were in the best tradition woman from Michigan, Samantha Reid. the dangers of GHB to their children. of staff of the United States Senate. She went to a small gathering of Samantha and I were not given the oppor- I also want to thank my friend on the friends, was given a drink from a soft tunity that S. 1561 has to offer. Lets not wait other side of the aisle, Senator BIDEN, drink bottle laced with GHB, and died. for one more senseless death before passing who has long been in the forefront of Samantha did nothing wrong. Her this legislation. Not one more mother should have to water the grass of a fresh grave, or controlled substances and other drug mother, Judi Clark, did nothing wrong. place wind chimes on a tender young tree abuse issues. I must also recognize the Unfortunately, this tragedy has struck planted to shade the site of their daughter. efforts of Ms. Marcia Lee of his staff this family. Pumpkins for Halloween should be carved at for her diligence and creativity in de- Four young men have been charged the kitchen table together, not placed by a veloping this language. under Michigan law for involuntary headstone. I must also recognize the efforts of manslaughter and poisoning. But, Our country is in desperate need of all the Chairmen THOMAS BLILEY and FRED given the prevalence and, as the Reid good this bill has to offer. Respectfully, UPTON for their work in developing and case highlights, the potential severity JUDI CLARK, sheparding the House companion to S. of GHB abuse, it seems clear—and both Rockwood, Michigan. 1561, H.R. 2310, through that body. In public health and law enforcement offi- Mr. President, I would say in closing this regard, I must mention the efforts cials agree on this—that this chemical that I am happy we have finally taken of John Manthei of the House Com- warrants regulation under the Con- the action which Judi Clark and other merce Committee as well as Ms. Jane trolled Substances Act. That’s exactly parents across this country have been Williams of Rep. UPTON’s staff. Both of what S. 1561 and its House companion asking us to take, to make sure that them deserve recognition for their accomplish. other children will be made aware of dedication to passing this bill. Some may raise a question about the dangers of GHB. Hopefully the S. 1561 is concerned with the proper whether the federal Controlled Sub- predators who use drugs such as this regulation of gamma hydrobutyric stances Act failed to operate in a fash- will be treated in the fashion they de- acid, the chemical known on the street ion that could have prevented deaths serve, which is to be prosecuted effec- as GHB which has both hateful and or sexual assaults through abuse of tively and put behind bars where they hopeful uses. On one hand, many fami- GHB. belong. lies across America have suffered due Although there have been reports of No one else should have to go to abuse of this agent which has been substantial GHB abuse for several through what this family has suffered. used to lull unsuspecting women into a years now, I do not know why the At- I am very determined to not only see date-rape situation and has even re- torney General and Secretary of Health this legislation pass, but also to work sulted in death through overdose. On and Human Services have been unable closely with the Department of Jus- the other hand, GHB holds unprece- to resolve the matters that have pre- tice, the Drug Enforcement Agency, dented promise to those one-quarter cluded this drug from being scheduled and State and local law enforcement million Americans suffering from ex- through the normal procedures under agencies, to make sure this is just the treme sleep disorders such as cataplexy the Controlled Substances Act. I don’t first step in what will ultimately be a and narcolepsy. know why it took until September of successful campaign to rid this Nation Cataplexy is a debilitating condition 1997 for the DEA to request FDA to of the illicit use of this drug, and to suffered by some 70,000 Americans that analyze the medical and scientific mat- make sure the children of our country results in an inability of the muscles to ters relating to GHB. I don’t know why are no longer the victims of predators function. Narcolepsy, which attacks it took until May 19, 1999 to get a re- who use it for criminal purposes. 170,000 Americans, causes a person sud- sponse to this request. I don’t know I yield the floor. denly and unpredictably to fall asleep. why DEA has not acted in the last six The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Neither of these terrible diseases have months to bring this matter to a con- Chair recognizes the Senator from an effective treatment today. As au- clusion through administrative means. Maine. thor of the 1984 Orphan Drug Act which It should not take an act of Congress Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I com- creates incentives for private sector to schedule a dangerous drug under the mend the Senator from Michigan for drug firms to investigate treatments Controlled Substances Act. his leadership and his eloquent state- for rare diseases, I am particularly sen- I do know that part of the unjustifi- ment. sitive to the needs of families suffering able delay in the scheduling of GHB
VerDate 29-OCT-99 05:43 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G19NO6.069 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 S14876 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 19, 1999 stemmed from the fact that there is a Subsections (b) and (c) of section 201 the control of GHB in Schedule I of the difference of opinion between DEA and of the Controlled Substances Act iden- CSA’’ and then asserts: ‘‘The data col- FDA about how to schedule this drug. tify eight criteria that must be taken lected to date would support control of But that answer is not good enough. It into account in scheduling a drug. With the GHB product in Schedule II.’’ is simply inadequate to tell a mother respect to scheduling a drug, these fac- Second, in addition to giving no ap- of a child like Samantha Reid, a prom- tors are: parent deference to HHS on matters ising young woman with her whole life (1) Its actual or relative potential for supposedly binding on DOJ under sec- ahead of her, that the system ‘‘just abuse. tion 201(b) of the CSA, DOJ almost takes time’’ because two bureaucracies (2) Scientific evidence of its pharma- seems to be interpreting the statute as disagreed about how something so seri- cological effect, if known. requiring full FDA approval before the (3) The state of current scientific knowl- ‘‘currently accepted medical use’’ lan- ous should be handled. edge regarding the drug or other substance. This situation points out that a sig- (4) Its history and current pattern of abuse. guage of the CSA can be satisfied. Such nificant breakdown in the system has (5) The scope, duration, and significance of an outcome is neither compelled by the occurred with respect to the scheduling abuse. statute, nor does it reflect sound public of GHB. It behooves the Congress to de- (6) What, if any, risk there is to the public health policy as it acts to discourage liberate more over ways to make the health. drug development and patient access to key agencies, DEA and FDA, be more (7) Its psychic or physiological dependence promising drugs in clinical trials. liability. responsive in the future, rather than be (8) Whether the substance is an immediate I hasten to point out that I have ad- forced to do their jobs for them. The precursor of a substance already controlled vocated stiffening the penalties for lesson of GHB should not be to teach under this title. abuse of date-rape drugs such as GHB. the agencies to wait for Congressional The statute proscribes that. In 1997 I successfully led the charge to action whenever the bureaucracy can- The recommendations of the Secretary (of enact a law that imposed schedule I- not act. Health and Human Services) to the Attorney level penalties for another date rape Let me just say that as a general General shall be binding on the Attorney drug, flunitrazepam. This product was matter I do not favor legislative sched- General as to such scientific and medical marketed for legitimate medical pur- uling or rescheduling. By statute, the matters, and if the Secretary recommends poses overseas and did not meet the responsibility for scheduling is dele- that a drug or other substance not be con- Schedule I requirement that ‘‘there is gated to the experts at DOJ and HHS. trolled, the Attorney General shall not con- lack of accepted safety for use of the The world is turned upside down when trol the drug or other substances. drug or other substance under medical DOJ informs Congress, as if did on May This is the section of the law which supervision.’’ Therefore, the Congress 3, 1999, that: ‘‘DOJ believes that it is appears not to have functioned opti- passed, and the President signed, my appropriate for Congress to schedule mally in the case of GHB. We can, and legislation to increase the penalties for GHB at this time.’’ should, do better in anticipating and this drug. But we stopped short of By any measure, a fair reading of the combating the next GHB. scheduling the pharmaceutical into Controlled Substances Act places the To a large degree, the legislation we Schedule I, recognizing that the prod- primary responsibility for regulating adopt today implements the May 19, uct does have accepted medical uses. It dangerous drugs upon law enforcement 1999 HHS recommendations and the ac- was my hope that this could be the and public health experts at the appro- companying ‘‘Eight Factor Analysis model for GHB legislation as well. priate federal agencies. I do have a con- Report’’ that take into account both I want to work constructively with cern about Congress legislating on the the illicit abuse of GHB as well as the my colleagues in Congress to achieve safety and efficacy of individual drug highly promising legitimate uses of our common goals of taking immediate products, especially before clinical this substance. While I believe that the action against GHB, preserving the in- testing or introduction into commerce language worked out by Senators tegrity of the CSA, and sending a commences. Nor should we allow the ABRAHAM and BIDEN, Chairman BLILEY, strong message to those agencies Congress to be placed in the position of Chairman MCCOLLUM, and the DEA, is charged with implementing the CSA making technical, scientific and law preferable to the earlier versions of the that they must work together in a co- enforcement judgment whenever an in- bill, I remain troubled by some aspects operative and expeditious way to pro- dividual drug product with an actual or of how the current statute has worked tect the American public. potential legitimate medicinal use is and may work in the future. While I think the bill we adopt today determined by experts to warrant the First, I am troubled that if we place might have been written differently, I application of the CSA. promising pharmaceutical candidates agree with my colleagues that our fore- I am firmly behind efforts to stop so- such as GHB into Schedule I of the most goal must be to take quick and called ‘‘date rapes,’’; this is a des- Controlled Substance Act we under- decisive action with respect to the picable crime and the Federal Govern- mine its integrity of the CSA and will criminalization of GHB used for non- ment should take action to make sure discourage the legitimate, potential medical purposes. Senator Abraham’s it does not occur. While I whole- life-saving uses of such compounds. Ac- bill is a good bill and he deserves a lot heartedly applaud the efforts of the cording to the statute, one of the three of credit for putting this improved leg- House to strike a blow against abuse of requirements of schedule I is that there islative package together. GHB, I am concerned about Congress is ‘‘no accepted medical use’’ in the Let me also note that the bill we getting directly involved in the sched- United States. But the May 19, 1999 have just passed includes language I uling process as the House mandated in HHS recommendation has already drafted requiring DEA to create a Spe- adopting H.R. 2130. In this regard, it found that the cataplexy product has cial Unit to assess the abuse and traf- was my strong sense that rather than cleared this hurdle: ficking of GHB and other date rape for Congress to legislatively schedule .. . the abuse potential of GHB, when used drugs, and will identify the threat GHB, it would have more impact to under an authorized research protocol, is posed by date rape drugs on a national amend the statute and direct DEA to consistent with substances typically con- and regional basis. I am pleased to be implement the Surgeon General’s rec- trolled under Schedule IV . . . An authorized the sponsor of S. 1947, the bill that cre- formulation of GHB is far enough along in ates this Special Unit. S. 1947 has been ommendations that were issued back the development process to meet the stand- on May 19, 1999. ard under Schedule II of a drug or substance incorporated in the final language that I will not take the time today to con- having a ‘‘currently accepted medical use we adopt today. I can assure all my sider the full implications of a policy with severe restrictions.’’ Under these cir- colleagues that this is one Senator of legislative rescheduling. I do plan in cumstances, HHS recommends placing au- that will closely review the Attorney the future to re-examine the sched- thorized formulations of GHB in Schedule General’s report on the allocation and uling provisions of the Controlled Sub- III. reallocation of resources to combat stances Act. On October 12, 1999 DOJ sent a letter date rape and other crimes related to At this point, let me elaborate fur- that disregards the May 19th HHS designer drugs. ther on some of the issues I have schedule III recommendation. DOJ first We can and should look further into raised. states ‘‘. . . the DEA strongly supports the problems associated with the
VerDate 29-OCT-99 05:47 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.100 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S14877 scheduling of drugs under CSA and contract’ means a contract that provides for October 1, 2002, the interoperability and whether we need to change the rel- the issuance, use, or redemption of coupons portability required under paragraph (2); evant laws. But today we honor the in the form of electronic benefit transfer ‘‘(ii) demonstrates that the best interest of memory of Hillory Farias and cards. the food stamp program would be served by ‘‘(C) INTEROPERABILTY.—The term ‘inter- granting the waiver with respect to the elec- Samantha Reid by taking an act that operability’ means a system that enables a tronic benefit transfer system used by the will hopefully reduce the risk of GHB coupon issued in the form of an electronic State agency to administer the food stamp abuse being visited upon unsuspecting benefit transfer card to be redeemed in any program; and women. State. ‘‘(iii) specifies a date by which the State f ‘‘(D) INTERSTATE TRANSACTION.—The term agency will achieve the interoperability and ‘interstate transaction’ means a transaction portability required under paragraph (2). ELECTRONIC BENEFIT TRANSFER that is initiated in 1 State by the use of an ‘‘(C) SMART CARD SYSTEMS.—The Secretary INTEROPERABILITY AND PORT- electronic benefit transfer card that is issued shall allow a State agency that is using ABILITY ACT OF 1999 in another State. smart cards for the delivery of food stamp ‘‘(E) PORTABILITY.—The term ‘portability’ program benefits to comply with the require- Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I ask ments of paragraph (2) at such time after Oc- unanimous consent that the Agri- means a system that enables a coupon issued in the form of an electronic benefit transfer tober 1, 2002, as the Secretary determines culture Committee be discharged from card to be used in any State by a household that a practicable technological method is further consideration of S. 1733, and to purchase food at a retail food store or available for interoperability with electronic that the Senate then proceed to its im- wholesale food concern approved under this benefit transfer cards. mediate consideration. Act. ‘‘(6) FUNDING.— The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without ‘‘(F) SETTLING.—The term ‘settling’ means ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In accordance with reg- objection, it is so ordered. movement, and reporting such movement, of ulations promulgated by the Secretary, the The clerk will report the bill by title. funds from an electronic benefit transfer Secretary shall pay 100 percent of the costs incurred by a State agency under this Act The legislative clerk read as follows: card issuer that is located in 1 State to a re- tail food store, or wholesale food concern, for switching and settling interstate A bill (S. 1733) to amend the Food Stamp that is located in another State, to accom- transactions— Act of 1977 to provide for a national standard plish an interstate transaction. ‘‘(i) incurred after the date of enactment of of interoperability and portability applicable ‘‘(G) SMART CARD.—The term ‘smart card’ this subsection and before October 1, 2002, if to electronic food stamp benefit trans- means an intelligent benefit card described the State agency uses the standard of inter- actions. in section 17(f). operability and portability adopted by a ma- There being no objection, the Senate ‘‘(H) SWITCHING.—The term ‘switching’ jority of State agencies; and proceeded to consider the bill. means the routing of an interstate trans- ‘‘(ii) incurred after September 30, 2002, if the State agency uses the uniform national AMENDMENT NO. 2785 action that consists of transmitting the de- standard of interoperability and portability Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, there is tails of a transaction electronically recorded through the use of an electronic benefit adopted under paragraph (4)(A). a substitute amendment at the desk transfer card in 1 State to the issuer of the ‘‘(B) LIMITATION.—The total amount paid submitted by Senator FITZGERALD, and card that is in another State. to State agencies for each fiscal year under I ask for its consideration. ‘‘(2) REQUIREMENT.—Not later than October subparagraph (A) shall not exceed $500,000.’’. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The 1, 2002, the Secretary shall ensure that sys- SEC. 4. STUDY OF ALTERNATIVES FOR HANDLING clerk will report. tems that provide for the electronic ELECTRONIC BENEFIT TRANS- issuance, use, and redemption of coupons in ACTIONS INVOLVING FOOD STAMP The legislative clerk read as follows: BENEFITS. the form of electronic benefit transfer cards The Senator from Maine (Ms. COLLINS), for Not later than 1 year after the date of en- are interoperable, and food stamp benefits Mr. FITZGERALD, proposes an amendment actment of this Act, the Secretary of Agri- are portable, among all States. numbered 2785. culture shall study and report to the Com- ‘‘(3) COST.—The cost of achieving the inter- Strike all after the enacting clause and in- mittee on Agriculture of the House of Rep- operability and portability required under sert the following: resentatives and the Committee on Agri- paragraph (2) shall not be imposed on any culture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Sen- SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. food stamp retail store, or any wholesale ate on alternatives for handling interstate This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Electronic food concern, approved to participate in the electronic benefit transactions involving Benefit Transfer Interoperabilty and Port- food stamp program. food stamp benefits provided under the Food ability Act of 1999’’. ‘‘(4) STANDARDS.—Not later than 210 days Stamp Act of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.), in- SEC. 2. PURPOSES. after the date of enactment of this sub- cluding the feasibility and desirability of a The purposes of this Act are— section, the Secretary shall promulgate reg- single hub for switching (as defined in sec- (1) to protect the integrity of the food ulations that— tion 7(k)(1) of that Act (as added by section stamp program; ‘‘(A) adopt a uniform national standard of 3)). (2) to ensure cost-effective portability of interoperability and portability required food stamp benefits across State borders under paragraph (2) that is based on the Mr. FITZGERALD. Mr. President, I without imposing additional administrative standard of interoperability and portability rise today to recognize the passage of expenses for special equipment to address used by a majority of State agencies; and the Electronic Benefit Transfer Inter- problems relating to the portability; ‘‘(B) require that any electronic benefit operability and Portability Act of 1999. (3) to enhance the flow of interstate com- transfer contract that is entered into 30 days This legislation addreses the problem merce involving electronic transactions in- or more after the regulations are promul- of food stamp beneficiaries being un- volving food stamp benefits under a uniform gated, by or on behalf of a State agency, pro- national standard of interoperability and vide for the interoperability and portability able to redeem their benefits in author- portability; and required under paragraph (2) in accordance ized stores that may be located outside (4) to eliminate the inefficiencies resulting with the national standard. their state of residence. from a patchwork of State-administered sys- ‘‘(5) EXEMPTIONS— As you may know, Congress passed tems and regulations established to carry ‘‘(A) CONTRACTS.—The requirements of legislation in 1996 that required the out the food stamp program paragraph (2) shall not apply to the transfer federal government to deliver food SEC. 3. INTEROPERABILTY AND PORTABILITY OF of benefits under an electronic benefit trans- stamp benefits electronically, rather FOOD STAMP TRANSACTIONS. fer contract before the expiration of the than using paper coupons. Most states Section 7 of the Food Stamp Act of 1977 (7 term of the contract if the contract— U.S.C. 2016) is amended by adding at the end ‘‘(i) is entered into before the date that is have started the process of issuing the following: 30 days after the regulations are promul- plastic cards, very similar to ATM ‘‘(k) INTEROPERABILTY AND PORTABILITY OF gated under paragraph (4); and cards, to access these benefits. The fed- ELECTRONIC BENEFIT TRANSFER TRANS- ‘‘(ii) expires after October 1, 2002. eral government termed this new proc- ACTIONS.— ‘‘(B) WAIVER.—At the request of a State ess, electronic benefits transfer (EBT). ‘‘(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection: agency, the Secretary may provide 1 waiver You may have noticed a separate ‘‘(A) ELECTRONIC BENEFIT TRANSFER CARD.— to temporarily exempt, for a period ending button on the payment terminal in The term ‘electronic benefit transfer card’ on or before the date specified under clause your local supermarket with the des- means a card that provides benefits under (iii), the State agency from complying with ignation ‘‘EBT’’ or a separate stand- this Act through an electronic benefit trans- the requirements of paragraph (2), if the fer service (as defined in subsection State agency— along payment terminal to handle (i)(11)(A)). ‘‘(i) establishes to the satisfaction of the these new transactions. ‘‘(B) ELECTRONIC BENEFIT TRANSFER CON- Secretary that the State agency faces un- More than half of the country has al- TRACT.—The term ‘electronic benefit transfer usual technological barriers to achieving by ready switched from the paper coupons
VerDate 29-OCT-99 05:07 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.101 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 S14878 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 19, 1999 to this new EBT card. However, one stamps. Since 1996, the transition from for the government of the District of Colum- significant issue is causing problems in paper coupons to electronic benefit bia and other activities chargeable in whole the program for retailers, states, and transfers has saved the federal govern- or in part against revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, recipients. That issue is the inability ment a significant amount of money. and for other purposes, shall make the fol- of recipients to use their state-issued For example, while the food stamp lowing correction: cards across state lines. This is espe- caseload decreased 24 percent from fis- At the appropriate place of the bill insert cially true in communities that are cal year 1995 to 1998, food stamp pro- the following: near a state border. duction and redemption costs dropped COMMODITY CREDIT CORPORATION Under the old paper system, recipi- by an impressive 39 percent. While it is PRODUCER-OWNED MARKETING ASSOCIATIONS ents could use the coupons in any state estimated that the bill’s implementa- FORGIVENESS in the country. Under the new elec- tion will cost the federal government SEC. 1. The Secretary of Agriculture shall tronic system, that is the case Cus- no more than $500,000 annually, it will reduce the amount of any principal due on a tomers go into a food store expecting save at least $20 million per year when loan made to marketing association incor- to use their federal benefits to pur- paper coupons are a thing of the past. porated in the State of North Carolina for the 1999 crop of an agricultural commodity chase food. When they cannot use their This legislation is sound public pol- by at least 75 percent if the marketing asso- EBT cards, they become frustrated and icy that enjoys strong bipartisan sup- ciation suffered losses of the agricultural dissatisfied with the food stamp pro- port. I thank my colleagues, Senators commodity in a county with respect to gram. LEAHY, LUGAR, HARKIN, CRAIG, COCH- which—(1) a natural disaster was declared by For example, under the old system, a RAN, CRAPO, KOHL, and KERREY for join- the Secretary for losses due to Hurricane food stamp recipient living in Palmyra, ing me as co-sponsors of this bill. This Dennis, Floyd, or Irene; or (2) a major dis- Missouri could use his food stamp cou- legislation is vitally important to aster or emergency was declared by the pons in his favorite grocery store in President for losses due to Hurricane Dennis, every food stamp recipient, every state Floyd, or Irene under the Robert T. Stafford Quincy, Illinois, just over the border. food stamp program administrator, and Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Similarly, a recipient living in Illinois every grocery store in the country. Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.) could visit family in Tennessee and I thank the presiding officer, and I If the Secretary assigns a grade quality for still purchase food for his children. yield the floor. the 1999 crop of an agricultural commodity Food stamp beneficiaries are not un- Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I ask marketed by an association described in this like the average shopper. Cross-border unanimous consent that the amend- section that is below the base quality of the agricultural commodity, the Secretary shall shopping occurs for a variety of rea- ment be agreed to, the bill be read a compensate the association for losses in- sons. One reason is convenience; an- third time and passed, as amended, the curred by the association as a result of the other equally important reason is the motion to reconsider be laid upon the reduction in grade quality. cost of groceries. The supermarket in- table, and that any statements relating Up to $81,000,000 of the resources of the dustry is very competitive. Customers to the bill be printed in the RECORD. Commodity Credit Corporation shall be used paying with every type of tender ex- The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without for the cost of this section: Provided, That cept EBT have the ability to shop objection, it is so ordered. the entire amount necessary to carry out this section shall be available only to the ex- around for the best prices. Shouldn’t The amendment (No. 2785) was agreed tent that an official budget request for the recipients of our nation’s federal food to. entire amount, that includes designation of assistance benefits be able to stretch The bill (S. 1733), as amended, was the entire amount of the request as an emer- their dollars without regard to state read the third time and passed, as fol- gency requirement as defined in the Bal- borders? lows: anced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Another reason for cross-border shop- [The bill was not available for print- Act of 1985, as amended, is transmitted by ping is convenience. While one of my ing. It will appear in a future edition of the President to the Congress: Provided fur- constituents may live in the metro ther, That the entire amount is designated the RECORD.] by the Congress as an emergency require- east area of Illinois, he or she may f ment pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A) and work in St. Louis. Under the current MAKING TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS Section 252(e) of such Act. situation, if the only grocery store be- SEC. 2. In administering $50,000,000 in emer- tween work and home is in Missouri, TO THE ENROLLMENT OF H.R. 3194 gency supplemental funding for the Emer- the recipient cannot purchase food Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I ask gency Conservation Program, the Secretary without traveling miles out of the way. unanimous consent that the Senate shall give priority to the repair of structures The legislation would once again pro- turn to the consideration of Senate essential to the operation of the farm. vide for the portability of food assist- Concurrent Resolution 77 now at the f ance benefits and allow food stamp re- desk introduced earlier by Senators EXEMPTIONS PURSUANT TO THE cipients the flexibility of shopping at LOTT and DASCHLE, and that the resolu- FEDERAL REPORTS ELIMI- locations that they choose. tion be considered read a third time NATION AND SUNSET ACT OF Interoperability works well today and passed, and the motion to recon- 1995 with ATM/Debit cards, the type of sider be laid upon the table. Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I ask cards that EBT was modeled after. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The unanimous consent that the Govern- Consumers and merchants are con- clerk will report the concurrent resolu- mental Affairs Committee be dis- fident that when a MAC card issued by tion by title. charged from further consideration of a bank in Pittsburgh is presented, au- The legislative clerk read as follows: H.R. 3111, and that the Senate proceed thorization and settlement of that A concurrent resolution (S. Con. Res. 77) to its immediate consideration. transaction will work the same as making technical corrections to the enroll- The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without ment of H.R. 3194. when a Star card, issued by Bank of objection, it is so ordered. America in California is presented. There being no objection, the Senate The clerk will report the bill by title. This occurs regardless of where the proceeded to consider the concurrent The legislative clerk read as follows: merchant is located. resolution. A bill (H.R. 3111) to exempt certain reports Unfortunately, this is currently not The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without from automatic elimination and sunset pur- the case with EBT cards. If every state objection, the concurrent resolution is suant to the Federal Reports Elimination operated their EBT program under a agreed to. and Sunset Act. standard set of operating rules, as this The concurrent resolution (S. Con. There being no objection, the Senate legislation requires, companies oper- Res. 77) was agreed to. proceeded to consider the bill. ating in multiple states could be more The concurrent resolution (S. Con. AMENDMENT NO. 2786 efficient, resolve any discrepancies in Res. 77) is as follows: (Purpose: To provide continued reporting of customer accounts more quickly, and S. CON. RES. 77 intercepted wire, oral, and electronic com- ultimately hold down the price of gro- Resolved by the Senate (the House of Rep- munications) ceries for all consumers. resentatives concurring), That the Clerk of the Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, Sen- This legislation is more about good House of Representatives, in the enrollment ator LEAHY has an amendment at the government than it is about food of the bill (H.R. 3194), making appropriations desk.
VerDate 29-OCT-99 05:47 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.090 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S14879 The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I am sitivities by changing the reporting clerk will report. pleased that the Senate is today con- agency and methodology on little to no The legislative clerk read as follows: sidering for final passage S. 1769, as notice. I appreciate, however, the AO’s The Senator from Maine (Ms. COLLINS), for amended by the House. I introduced S. interest in transferring the wiretap re- Mr. LEAHY, proposes an amendment num- 1769 with Chairman HATCH on October porting requirement to another entity. bered 2786. 22, 1999 and it passed the Senate on No- Any such transfer must be accom- Add at the end the following: vember 5, 1999. This bill will continue plished with a minimum of disruption SEC. 2. (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be and enhance the current reporting re- to the collection and reporting of infor- cited as the ‘‘Continued Reporting of Inter- quirements for the Administrative Of- mation and with complete assurances cepted Wire, Oral, and Electronic Commu- that any new entity is able to fulfill nications Act’’. fice of the Courts and the Attorney (b) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the fol- General on the eavesdropping and sur- this important job as capably as the lowing findings: veillance activities of our federal and AO has done. (1) Section 2519(3) of title 18, United States state law enforcement agencies. The S. 1769 would update the reporting re- Code, requires the Director of the Adminis- House amendment is the text of H.R. quirements currently in place with one trative Office of the United States Courts to 3111, a bill to exempt from automatic additional reporting requirement. Spe- transmit to Congress a full and complete an- elimination and sunset certain reports cifically, the bill would require the nual report concerning the number of appli- submitted to Congress that are useful wiretap reports prepared beginning in cations for orders authorizing or approving calendar year 2000 to include informa- the interception of wire, oral, or electronic and helpful in informing the Congress and the public about the activities of tion on the number of orders in which communications. This report is required to encryption was encountered and include information specified in section federal agencies in the enforcement of whether such encryption prevented law 2519(3). federal law. I am also glad to support enforcement from obtaining the plain (2) The Federal Reports Elimination and this amendment. Sunset Act of 1995 provides for the termi- For many years, the Administrative text of communications intercepted nation of certain laws requiring submittal to Office (AO) of the Courts has complied pursuant to such order. Encryption technology is critical to Congress of annual, semiannual, and regular with the statutory requirement, in 18 periodic reports as of December 21, 1999, 4 protect sensitive computer and online U.S.C. § 2519(3), to report to Congress years from the effective date of that Act. information. Yet, the same technology (3) Due to the Federal Reports Elimination annually the number and nature of fed- poses challenges to law enforcement Act and Sunset Act of 1995, the Administra- eral and state applications for orders when it is exploited by criminals to tive Office of United States Courts is not re- authorizing or approving the intercep- hide evidence or the fruits of criminal quired to submit that annual report de- tion of wire, oral or electronic commu- activities. A report by the U.S. Work- scribed in section 219(3) of title 18, United nications. By letter dated September 3, States Code, as of December 21, 1999. ing Group on Organized Crime titled, 1999, the AO advised that it would no ‘‘Encryption and Evolving Tech- (c) CONTINUED REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.— longer submit this report because ‘‘as (1) CONTINUED REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.— nologies: Tools of Organized Crime and Section 2519 of title 18, United States Code, of December 21, 1999, the report will no Terrorism,’’ released in 1997, collected is amended by adding at the end the fol- longer be required pursuant to the Fed- anecdotal case studies on the use of lowing: eral Reports Elimination and Sunset encryption in furtherance of criminal ‘‘(4) The reports required to be filed by sub- Act of 1995.’’ I commend the AO for activities in order to estimate the fu- section (3) are exempted from the termi- alerting Congress that their responsi- ture impact of encryption on law en- nation provisions of section 3003(a) of the bility for the wiretap reports would forcement. The report noted the need Federal Reports Elimination and Sunset Act lapse at the end of this year, and for for ‘‘an ongoing study of the effect of of 1995 (Public Law 104–66).’’. doing so in time for Congress to take (2) EXEMPTION.—Section 3003(d) of the Fed- encryption and other information tech- eral Reports Elimination and Sunset Act of action. nologies on investigations, prosecu- 1995 (Public Law 104–66) is amended— The AO has done an excellent job of tions, and intelligence operations’’. As (a) in paragraph (31), by striking ‘‘or’’ at preparing the wiretap reports. We need part of this study, ‘‘a database of case the end; to continue the AO’s objective work in information from federal and local law (b) in paragraph (32), by striking the period a consistent manner. If another agency enforcement and intelligence agencies and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and took over this important task at this should be established and maintained.’’ (c) by adding at the end the following: juncture and the numbers came out in Adding a requirement that reports be ‘‘(33) section 2519(3) of title 18, United a different format, it would imme- States Code.’’. furnished on the number of occasions diately generate questions and con- (d) ENCRYPTION REPORTING REQUIRE- when encryption is encountered by law MENTS.— cerns over the legitimacy and accuracy enforcement is a far more reliable basis (1) Section 2519(2)(b) of title 18, United of the contents of that report. than anecdotal evidence on which to States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘and In addition, it would create difficul- assess law enforcement needs and make (iv)’’ and inserting ‘‘(iv) the number of orders ties in comparing statistics from prior sensible policy in this area. in which encryption was encountered and years going back to 1969 and com- The final section of S. 1769 would cod- whether such encryption prevented law en- plicate the job of congressional over- ify the information that the Attorney forcement from obtaining the plain text of sight. Furthermore, transferring this General already provides on pen reg- communications intercepted pursuant to reporting duty to another agency such order, and (v)’’. ister and trap and trace device orders, (2) The encryption reporting requirement might create delays in issuance of the and would require further information in subsection (a) shall be effective for the re- report since no other agency has the on where such orders are issued and the port transmitted by the Director of the Ad- methodology in place. Finally, federal, types of facilities—telephone, com- ministrative Office of the Courts for cal- state and local agencies are well accus- puter, pager or other device—to which endar year 2000 and in subsequent reports. tomed to the reporting methodology the order relates. Under the Electronic (e) REPORTS CONCERNING PEN REGISTERS developed by the AO. Notifying all Communications Privacy Act AND TRAP AND TRACE DEVICES.—Section 3126 these agencies that the reporting (‘‘ECPA’’) of 1986, P.L. 99–508, codified of title 18, United States Code, is amended by standards and agency have changed striking the period and inserting ‘‘, which re- at 18 U.S.C. § 3126, the Attorney Gen- port shall include information concerning— would inevitably create more confusion eral of the United States is required to ‘‘(1) the period of interceptions authorized and more expense as law enforcement report annually to the Congress on the by the order, and the number and duration of agencies across the country are forced number of pen register orders and or- any extensions of the order; to learn a new system and develop a li- ders for trap and trace devices applied ‘‘(2) the offense specified in the order or ap- aison with a new agency. for by law enforcement agencies of the plication, or extension of an order; The system in place now has worked Department of Justice. As the original ‘‘(3) the number of investigations involved; well and we should avoid any disrup- sponsor of ECPA, I believed that ade- ‘‘(4) the number and nature of the facilities tions. We know how quickly law en- quate oversight of the surveillance ac- affected; and ‘‘(5) the identity, including district, of the forcement may be subjected to criti- tivities of federal law enforcement applying investigative or law enforcement cism over their use of these surrep- could only be accomplished with re- agency making the application and the per- titious surveillance tools and we porting requirements such as the one son authorizing the order.’’. should avoid aggravating these sen- included in this law.
VerDate 29-OCT-99 05:07 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G19NO6.074 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 S14880 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 19, 1999 The reports furnished by the Attor- eral Reports Elimination and Sunset information from federal and local law ney General on an annual basis compile Act of 1995.’’ I commend the AO for enforcement and intelligence agencies information from five components of alerting Congress that their responsi- should be established and maintained.’’ the Department of Justice: the Federal bility for the wiretap reports would Adding a requirement that reports be Bureau of Investigation, the Drug En- lapse at the end of this year, and for furnished on the number of occasions forcement Administration, the Immi- doing so in time for Congress to take when encryption is encountered by law gration and Naturalization Service, the action. enforcement is a far more reliable basis United States Marshals Service and the The AO has done an excellent job of than anecdotal evidence on which to Office of the Inspector General. The re- preparing the wiretap reports. We need assess law enforcement needs and make port contains information on the num- to continue the AO’s objective work in sensible policy in this area. ber of original and extension orders a consistent manner. If another agency The final section of this amendment made to the courts for authorization to took over this important task at this would codify the information that the use both pen register and trap and juncture and the numbers came out in Attorney General already provides on trace devices, information concerning a different format, it would imme- pen register and trap and trace device the number of investigations involved, diately generate questions and con- orders, and require further information the offenses on which the applications cerns over the legitimacy and accuracy on where such orders are issued and the were predicted and the number of peo- of the contents of that report. types of facilities—telephone, com- ple whose telephone facilities were af- In addition, it would create difficul- puter, pager or other device—to which fected. ties in comparing statistics from prior the order relates. Under the Electronic These specific categories of informa- years going back to 1969 and com- Communications Privacy Act, ‘‘ECPA’’ tion are useful, and S. 1769 would direct plicate the job of congressional over- of 1986, P.L. 99–508, codified at 18 U.S.C. the Attorney General to continue pro- sight. Furthermore, transferring this § 3126, the Attorney General of the viding these specific categories of in- reporting duty to another agency United States is required to report an- formation. In addition, the bill would might create delays in issuance of the nually to the Congress on the number direct the Attorney General to include report since no other agency has the of pen register orders and orders for trap and trace devices applied for by information on the identity, including methodology in place. Finally, federal, law enforcement agencies of the De- the district, of the agency making the state and local agencies are well accus- partment of Justice. As the original application and the person authorizing tomed to the reporting methodology sponsor of ECPA, I believed that ade- the order. In this way, the Congress developed by the AO. Notifying all quate oversight of the surveillance ac- and the public will be informed of those these agencies that the reporting tivities of federal law enforcement jurisdictions using this surveillance standards and agency have changed could only be accomplished with re- technique—information which is cur- would inevitably create more confusion porting requirements such as the one rently not included in the Attorney and more expense as law enforcement included in this law. General’s annual reports. agencies across the country are forced The reports furnished by the Attor- The requirement for preparation of to learn a new system and develop a li- ney General on an annual basis compile the wiretap reports will soon lapse so I aison with a new agency. information from five components of am delighted to see the Congress take The system in place now has worked the Department of Justice: the Federal prompt action on this legislation to well and should be continued. We know Bureau of Investigation, the Drug En- continue the requirement for submis- how quickly law enforcement may be forcement Administration, the Immi- sion of the wiretap reports and to up- subjected to criticism over their use of gration and Naturalization Service, the date the reporting requirements for these surreptitious surveillance tools United States Marshals Office and the both the wiretap reports submitted by and we should avoid aggravating these Office of the Inspector General. The re- the AO and the pen register and trap sensitivities by changing the reporting port contains information on the num- and trace reports submitted by the At- agency. ber of original and extension orders torney General. The amendment would update the re- made to the courts for authorization to Mr. President, I am also pleased that porting requirements currently in use both pen register and trap and the Senate is today considering H.R. place with one additional reporting re- trace devices, information concerning 3111 to exempt from automatic elimi- quirement. Specifically, the amend- the number of investigations involved, nation and sunset certain reports sub- ment would require the wiretap reports the offenses on which the applications mitted to Congress that are useful and prepared beginning in calendar year were predicted and the number of peo- helpful in informing the Congress and 2000 to include information on the ple whose telephone facilities were af- the public about the activities of fed- number of orders in which encryption fected. eral agencies in the enforcement of fed- was encountered and whether such These specific categories of informa- eral law. Senator HATCH and I offer as encryption prevented law enforcement tion are useful, and the amendment an amendment to H.R. 3111 the text of from obtaining the plain text of com- would direct the Attorney General to a bill S. 1769, which I introduced with munications intercepted pursuant to continue providing these specific cat- Chairman Hatch on October 22, 1999 and such order. egories of information. In addition, the which passed the Senate on November Encryption technology is critical to amendment would direct the Attorney 5, 1999. This amendment will continue protect sensitive computer and online General to include information on the and enhance the current reporting re- information. Yet, the same technology identity, including the district, of the quirements for the Administrative Of- poses challenges to law enforcement agency making the application and the fice of the Courts and the Attorney when it is exploited by criminals to person authorizing the order. In this General on the eavesdropping and sur- hide evidence or the fruits of criminal way, the Congress and the public will veillance activities of our federal and activities. A report by the U.S. Work- be informed of those jurisdictions using state law enforcement agencies. ing Group on Organized Crime titled, this surveillance technique-informa- For many years, the Administrative ‘‘Encryption and Evolving Tech- tion which is currently not included in Office (AO) of the Courts has complied nologies: Tools of Organized Crime and the Attorney General’s annual reports. with the statutory requirement, in 18 Terrorism,’’ released in 1997, collected The requirement for preparation of U.S.C. § 2519(3), to report to Congress anecdotal case studies on the use of the wiretap reports will soon lapse so I annually the number and nature of fed- encryption in furtherance of criminal am delighted to see the Senate take eral and state applications for orders activities in order to estimate the fu- prompt action on this legislation to authorizing or approving the intercep- ture impact of encryption on law en- continue the requirement for submis- tion of wire, oral or electronic commu- forcement. The report noted the need sion of the wiretap reports and to up- nications. By letter dated September 3, for ‘‘an ongoing study of the effect of date the reporting requirements for 1999, the AO advised that it would no encryption and other information tech- both the wiretap reports submitted by longer submit this report because ‘‘as nologies on investigations, prosecu- the AO and the pen register and trap of December 21, 1999, the report will no tions, and intelligence operations’’. As and trace reports submitted by the At- longer be required pursuant to the Fed- part of this study, ‘‘a database of case torney General.
VerDate 29-OCT-99 05:07 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G19NO6.075 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S14881 Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I ask tion that enacts such laws should have the right Uniform State Law in the form or any variation unanimous consent that the amend- to determine the need for any exceptions to pro- thereof that is authorized or provided for in ment be agreed to, the bill, as amend- tect consumers and maintain consistency with such report. ed, be read a third time and passed, the existing related bodies of law within a par- SEC. 5. PRINCIPLES GOVERNING THE USE OF ticular jurisdiction. ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES IN INTER- motion to reconsider be laid upon the (7) Industry has developed several electronic NATIONAL TRANSACTIONS. table, and that any statements relating signature technologies for use in electronic To the extent practicable, the Federal Govern- to the bill be printed in the RECORD. transactions, and the public policies of the ment shall observe the following principles in an The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without United States should serve to promote a dy- international context to enable commercial elec- objection, it is so ordered. namic marketplace within which these tech- tronic transaction: The amendment (No. 2786) was agreed nologies can compete. Consistent with this Act, (1) Remove paper-based obstacles to electronic to. States should permit the use and development of transactions by adopting relevant principles The bill (H. R. 3111), as amended, was any authentication technologies that are appro- from the Model Law on Electronic Commerce read the third time and passed. priate as practicable as between private parties adopted in 1996 by the United Nations Commis- and in use with State agencies. sion on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). f SEC. 3. PURPOSES. (2) Permit parties to a transaction to deter- THIRD MILLENNIUM ELECTRONIC The purposes of this Act are— mine the appropriate authentication tech- nologies and implementation models for their COMMERCE ACT (1) to permit and encourage the continued ex- pansion of electronic commerce through the op- transactions, with assurance that those tech- Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I now eration of free market forces rather than pro- nologies and implementation models will be rec- ask unanimous consent that the Sen- scriptive governmental mandates and regula- ognized and enforced. (3) Permit parties to a transaction to have the ate proceed to the consideration of Cal- tions; endar No. 243, S. 761. (2) to promote public confidence in the valid- opportunity to prove in court or other pro- The PRESIDING OFFICER. The ity, integrity and reliability of electronic com- ceedings that their authentication approaches merce and online government under Federal and their transactions are valid. clerk will report the bill by title. (4) Take a non-discriminatory approach to law; The legislative clerk read as follows: electronic signatures and authentication meth- (3) to facilitate and promote electronic com- A bill (S. 761) to regulate interstate com- ods from other jurisdictions. merce by clarifying the legal status of electronic merce by electronic means by permitting SEC. 6. INTERSTATE CONTRACT CERTAINTY. and encouraging the continued expansion of records and electronic signatures in the context of writing and signing requirements imposed by (a) IN GENERAL.—The following rules apply to electronic commerce through the operation any commercial transaction affecting interstate of free market forces, and other purposes. law; (4) to facilitate the ability of private parties commerce: There being no objection, the Senate engaged in interstate transactions to agree (1) A record or signature may not be denied proceeded to consider the bill which among themselves on the terms and conditions legal effect or enforceability solely because it is had been reported from the Committee on which they use and accept electronic signa- in electronic form. on Commerce, Science, and Transpor- tures and electronic records; and (2) A contract may not be denied legal effect or enforceability solely because an electronic tation, with an amendment to strike (5) to promote the development of a consistent national legal infrastructure necessary to sup- record was used in its formation. all after the enacting clause and insert- (3) If a law requires a record to be in writing, port of electronic commerce at the Federal and ing in lieu thereof the following: or provides consequences if it is not, an elec- State levels within existing areas of jurisdiction. SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. tronic record satisfies the law. This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Third Millen- SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS. (4) If a law requires a signature, or provides nium Digital Commerce Act’’. In this Act: consequences in the absence of a signature, the SEC. 2. FINDINGS. (1) ELECTRONIC.—The term ‘‘electronic’’ law is satisfied with respect to an electronic The Congress makes the following findings: means relating to technology having electrical, record if the electronic record includes an elec- (1) The growth of electronic commerce and digital, magnetic, wireless, optical, electro- tronic signature. electronic government transactions represent a magnetic, or similar capabilities. (b) METHODS.—The parties to a contract may powerful force for economic growth, consumer (2) ELECTRONIC AGENT.—The term ‘‘electronic agree on the terms and conditions on which choice, improved civic participation and wealth agent’’ means a computer program or an elec- they will use and accept electronic signatures creation. tronic or other automated means used to initiate and electronic records, including the methods (2) The promotion of growth in private sector an action or respond to electronic records or therefor, in commercial transactions affecting electronic commerce through Federal legislation performances in whole or in part without review interstate commerce. Nothing in this subsection is in the national interest because that market is by an individual at the time of the action or re- requires that any party enter into such a con- globally important to the United States. sponse. tract. (3) A consistent legal foundation, across mul- (3) ELECTRONIC RECORD.—The term ‘‘elec- (c) INTENT.—The following rules apply to any tiple jurisdictions, for electronic commerce will tronic record’’ means a record created, gen- commercial transaction affecting interstate com- promote the growth of such transactions, and erated, sent, communicated, received, or stored merce: that such a foundation should be based upon a by electronic means. (1) An electronic record or electronic signature simple, technology neutral, non-regulatory, and (4) ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE.—The term ‘‘elec- is attributable to a person if it was the act of the market-based approach. tronic signature’’ means an electronic sound, person. The act of the person may be established (4) The Nation and the world stand at the be- symbol, or process attached to or logically asso- in any manner, including a showing of the effi- ginning of a large scale transition to an infor- ciated with an electronic record and executed or cacy of any security procedures applied to de- mation society which will require innovative adopted by a person with the intent to sign the termine the person to which the electronic legal and policy approaches, and therefore, electronic record. record or electronic signature was attributable. States can serve the national interest by con- (5) GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY.—The term ‘‘gov- (2) The effect of an electronic record or elec- tinuing their proven role as laboratories of inno- ernmental agency’’ means an executive, legisla- tronic signature attributed to a person under vation for quickly evolving areas of public pol- tive, or judicial agency, department, board, com- paragraph (1) is determined from the context icy, provided that States also adopt a consistent, mission, authority, institution, or instrumen- and surrounding circumstances at the time of its reasonable national baseline to eliminate obso- tality of the Federal Government or of a State or creation, execution, or adoption, including the lete barriers to electronic commerce such as of any county, municipality, or other political parties’ agreement, if any, and otherwise as pro- undue paper and pen requirements, and further, subdivision of a State. vided by law. that any such innovation should not unduly (6) RECORD.—The term ‘‘record’’ means infor- (d) FORMATION OF CONTRACT.—A contract re- burden inter-jurisdictional commerce. mation that is inscribed on a tangible medium or lating to a commercial transaction affecting (5) To the extent State laws or regulations do that is stored in an electronic or other medium interstate commerce may not be denied legal ef- not provide a consistent, reasonable national and is retrievable in perceivable form. fect solely because its formation involved— baseline or in fact create an undue burden to (7) TRANSACTION.—The term ‘‘transaction’’ (1) the interaction of electronic agents of the interstate commerce in the important burgeoning means an action or set of actions relating to the parties; or area of electronic commerce, the national inter- conduct of commerce between 2 or more persons, (2) the interaction of an electronic agent of a est is best served by Federal preemption to the neither of which is the United States Govern- party and an individual who acts on that indi- extent necessary to provide such consistent, rea- ment, a State, or an agency, department, board, vidual’s own behalf or for another person. sonable national baseline eliminate said burden, commission, authority, institution, or instru- (e) APPLICATION IN UETA STATES.—This sec- but that absent such lack of consistent, reason- mentality of the United States Government or of tion does not apply in any State in which the able national baseline or such undue burdens, a State. Uniform Electronic Transactions Act is in effect. the best legal system for electronic commerce (8) UNIFORM ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS ACT.— SEC. 7. STUDY OF LEGAL AND REGULATORY BAR- will result from continuing experimentation by The term ‘‘Uniform Electronic Transactions RIERS TO ELECTRONIC COMMERCE. individual jurisdictions. Act’’ means the Uniform Electronic Trans- (a) BARRIERS.—Each Federal agency shall, (6) With due regard to the fundamental need actions Act as reported to State legislatures by not later than 6 months after the date of enact- for a consistent national baseline, each jurisdic- the National Conference of Commissioners on ment of this Act, provide a report to the Director
VerDate 29-OCT-99 05:21 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 6333 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.017 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 S14882 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 19, 1999 of the Office of Management and Budget and Commerce Act, and Senator WYDEN, merce Act. This measure is important the Secretary of Commerce identifying any pro- the lead cosponsor of the legislation, because it would ensure the legal cer- vision of law administered by such agency, or and Senators MCCAIN, BURNS, and tainty of electronic signatures in inter- any regulations issued by such agency and in LOTT, who joined as cosponsors. I also state commerce. effect on the date of enactment of this Act, that Mr. President, right now, there are may impose a barrier to electronic transactions, thank Senator LEAHY, Senator SAR- or otherwise to the conduct of commerce online BANES, Senator HOLLINGS, Senator over forty different state electronic au- or be electronic means. Such barriers include, MCCAIN and others who have worked thentication regimes in play. This but are not limited to, barriers imposed by a law with Senator WYDEN and me in moving patchwork of inconsistent and often or regulation directly or indirectly requiring this through the legislative process. I conflicting state laws makes it dif- that signatures, or records of transactions, be express my appreciation to all my col- ficult to conduct business-to-business accomplished or retained in other than elec- leagues. and business-to-consumer transactions tronic form. In its report, each agency shall As we move into the era of e-com- over the Internet. Those involved in identify the barriers among those identified merce it is important that people who electronic transactions want assurance whose removal would require legislative action, and shall indicate agency plans to undertake wish to engage in commercial trans- that their contractual arrangements regulatory action to remove such barriers among actions online over the Internet be able are legally binding. those identified as are caused by regulations to do so as effectively and efficiently Senator ABRAHAM took the lead on issued by the agency. as possible. Part of the challenge we this issue and crafted a bill to ensure (b) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—The Secretary of confront is when people are entering that a national framework would gov- Commerce, in consultation with the Director of into contracts in this nonwritten con- ern the use of electronic signatures. It the Office of Management and Budget, shall, text, the potential exists for questions is a rational, coherent, and minimalist within 18 months after the date of enactment of approach. An approach supported by this Act, and after the consultation required by to be raised as to the validity of the subsection (c) of this section, report to the Con- contractual arrangements. Without America Online, American Bankers As- gress concerning— getting into all the details, the goal of sociation, American Council of Life In- (1) legislation needed to remove barriers to the Millennium Digital Commerce Act surance, the American Electronics As- electronic transactions or otherwise to the con- is to address this issue. Approximately sociation, American Financial Services duct of commerce online or by electronic means; 42 States have already passed what in Association, American Insurance Asso- and effect are digital signature authentica- ciation, Apple, Business Software Alli- (2) actions being taken by the Executive ance, Charles Schwab, the Coalition for Branch and individual Federal agencies to re- tion laws which address contracts en- move such barriers as are caused by agency reg- tered into online or which address the Electronic Authentication, Consumer ulations or policies. validity of contracts entered into Mortgage Coalition, DLJ Direct, the (c) CONSULTATION.—In preparing the report through the web. The problem is those Electronic Industry Alliance, FORD, required by this section, the Secretary of Com- 42 bills are all different. It is possible Gateway2000, General Electric Com- merce shall consult with the General Services for people to argue that a contract is pany, GTE, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Administration, the National Archives and valid in one State and not valid in the Intel, Intuit, the Information Tech- Records Administration, and the Attorney Gen- State of the other contracting party nology Association of America, the In- eral concerning matters involving the authen- formation Technology Industry Coun- ticity of records, their storage and retention, and, thus, is an invalid document. and their usability for law enforcement pur- The purpose of our legislation is to cil, Microsoft, NCR, the National Asso- poses. try to make all such agreements valid ciation of Manufacturers, National Re- (d) INCLUDE FINDINGS IF NO RECOMMENDA- if they fit or meet some parameters, tail Federation, and the U.S. Chamber TIONS.—If the report required by this section identical to the ones the States are of Commerce, among others. omits recommendations for actions needed to moving toward; a uniform system. In Mr. President, in drafting his legisla- fully remove identified barriers to electronic short, we believe this will be an in- tion, Senator ABRAHAM included key transactions or to online or electronic commerce, terim approach until the States have concepts and provisions developed by it shall include a finding or findings, including the National Conference of Commis- substantial reasons therefor, that such removal passed a model uniform act. If we don’t is impracticable or would be inconsistent with do this, impediments will exist be- sioners on Uniform State Law the implementation or enforcement of applicable tween parties who wish to contract via (NCCUSL). A NCCUSL working group, laws. the Internet and through electronic which included legal scholars, experts AMENDMENT NO. 2787 commerce. We believe the passage of on electronic commerce, state officials Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, Sen- this bill will relieve those impediments and other interested stakeholders, ators ABRAHAM, WYDEN, and LEAHY and allow for e-commerce to continue spent the better part of two years have an amendment at the desk, and I to expand and grow and strengthen our drafting the Uniform Electronic Trans- ask for its consideration. economy. actions Act (UETA). This model legis- The PRESIDING OFFICER. The I am very pleased at the passage of lation was formally approved in August clerk will report. the bill today, and look forward to and is expected to be enacted on a The legislative clerk read as follows: working with our counterparts in the state-by-state basis, much like the The Senator from Maine [Ms. COLLINS] for House, they have passed a slightly dif- process followed in approving the Uni- Mr. ABRAHAM, for himself, Mr. WYDEN, and ferent bill, to pound out a final con- form Commercial Code, over the next Mr. LEAHY, proposes an amendment num- sensus through the conferencing proc- three to five years. bered 2787. ess and bring back to the Senate the Senator ABRAHAM’s electronic signa- The amendment is as follows: output of that process. I hope to do this tures measure is timely in that it The amendment is printed in today’s very early in the next session, so we serves as an interim solution needed to RECORD under ‘‘Amendments Sub- can enact this legislation and move it fill the void until states approve the mitted.’’ to the President for his signature, and, model UETA package. Ms. COLLINS. I ask unanimous con- as I said at the outset, improve the ef- I applaud the junior Senator from sent that the amendment be agreed to. ficiency with which we engage in an ex- Michigan for his continuing leadership The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without panded e-commerce universe. on technology issues and commend the objection, it is so ordered. I yield the floor. Senate’s action today. This is defi- The amendment (No. 2787) was agreed Mr. LOTT. Mr. President, I want to nitely a significant step in the right di- to. acknowledge the significant efforts of rection. Ms. COLLINS. It is my under- Senator ABRAHAM to author and pass Mr. President, Senator ABRAHAM, my standing the Senator from Michigan, legislation aimed at facilitating the colleagues on this side of the aisle, and Senator ABRAHAM, has a statement to growth of electronic commerce. Com- I agree that the measure passed today, make on this important legislation. merce that everyone agrees is a signifi- while a significant accomplishment, I yield to the Senator from Michigan. cant driving force behind our nation’s only gets consumers to the 50-yard line Mr. ABRAHAM. Mr. President, I will robust and expanding economy. when it comes to e-commerce. In order briefly comment on this legislation. Today, the Senate passed by unani- to get to the end-zone, Congress still First, I thank the cosponsors of this mous consent an Abraham substitute needs to address the issue of electronic legislation, the Millennium Digital for S. 761, the Millennium Digital Com- records.
VerDate 29-OCT-99 05:21 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.018 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S14883 The Millennium Digital Commerce Consumers want and need electronic use their superior bargaining power to Act that was unanimously approved by records, not only because digitized compel or confuse consumers into the Senate Commerce Committee in records are the equivalent of paper-no- waiving their rights to insist on paper July would have also provided legal tices, records, and disclosures, but also disclosures and communications, even certainty to electronic records. How- because such information is often easi- when they do not have the techno- ever, eleventh hour objections from the er to access, read, store and maintain. logical capacity to receive, retain, and minority, some of which were com- Electronic records will save consumers print electronic records. Could a bor- pletely unrelated to this bill, thwarted time, money, and the hassle of waiting rower be compelled to receive delin- repeated efforts to bring this crucial for paper notices and disclosures. Used quency or foreclosure notices by elec- measure to the floor. in conjunction with an electronic sig- tronic mail, even if she did not have a Mr. President, I would point out that nature, electronic records, with appro- computer, or her computer could not the reported bill, with its electronic priate and effective electronic disclo- read the notices in the electronic for- records provisions, had bipartisan sup- sures, allow anyone, with a hook-up to mat in which they were sent? Would port and was strongly endorsed by the the borderless World Wide Web, to Administration, not once, but twice. In transact business at any time and at she be entitled to revert to paper com- fact the Office of Management and any place. munications if her computer broke or Budget’s Statement of Administration Mr. President, it is the seamless na- became obsolete? Could a company re- Policy noted ‘‘the Administration sup- ture of the Internet that makes it such quire customers to check its Web site ports the passage of S. 761 . . . [Its] a phenomenal communications and for important safety information re- provisions strike the appropriate bal- business medium. To ensure that no garding its products, or for recall no- ance between the needs of each State one is left out of this new millennium tices? to develop its own laws in relation to paradigm, the legal certainty of elec- Under S.761 as reported, the company commercial transactions and the needs tronic records must be codified in fed- would not have been required to pro- of the Federal government to ensure eral statute—at least until UETA is vide any information on paper, even if that electronic commerce will not be adopted nationally. It is my sincere a state consumer protection law so re- impeded by the lack of consistency in hope that Congress will address the le- quired. Crucial information about the the treatment of electronic authentica- gality of electronic records in the near consumer’s rights and obligations tion.’’ term so consumers will experience the The Commerce Committee reported would not be received. It was federal full benefits and to reap the rewards of preemption beyond need, to the det- measure did not, as some contend, the Internet. alter federal or state consumer protec- Again, I want to applaud the efforts riment of American consumers. tion laws. Instead, Senator ABRAHAM’s of the Senate in passing S. 761, Senator The problem did not stop there. When bill simply held that records could not ABRAHAM’s electronic signatures bill. information is provided electronically, be denied legal effect solely, and the This action is good for America’s con- for it to be useful at a later time to key word is ‘‘solely,’’ because such sumers, good for America’s businesses, prove its contents, the electronic file records were in electronic form. and good for our nation’s economy and must be tamperproof. Otherwise, a con- Mr. President, consumers stand the prosperity. sumer could inadvertently change a most to gain from electronic records Mr. President, Senator ABRAHAM has single byte on the file and thus make it and the most to lose if such records are once again proven that he is a cham- technically different from the original, not clearly granted legal effect, valid- pion of technology, a guardian of the and useless to prove its contents. The ity, and enforceability. In order to fur- consumer, and an extremely effective consumer would be left without any ther assuage concerns, Senator ABRA- legislator. means of proving critical terms of the HAM, in earnest, offered a substitute Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I am contract, including the terms of the version that largely incorporated key pleased that the Senate today is pass- warranty. provisions of UETA, verbatim. Even so, ing the Abraham-Leahy substitute and as perplexing as it would seem, his amendment to S.761, the Millennium I have been working with Senator UETA substitute was opposed by the Digital Commerce Act. This bill seeks ABRAHAM and others since August to minority. Remember, these are the to permit and encourage the continued address these and other concerns I had words developed and agreed to by an expansion of electronic commerce, and with the bill. We crafted a bipartisan esteemed panel of national and state to promote public confidence in its in- compromise several weeks ago, but it legal experts, and these are the same tegrity and reliability. These are wor- fell apart after certain industry rep- words that will go into effect as states thy goals—goals that I have long resentatives complained that it did not adopt UETA during the next few years. sought to advance. In the last Con- go far enough to relieve them of federal I would point out that the Depart- gress, many of us worked together to and state regulatory authority. Fortu- ment of Commerce, in its June 22, 1999 pass the Government Paperwork Elimi- nately, other industry representatives position letter supporting the Abraham nation Act, which established a frame- recognized that this was not the pri- substitute bill that passed the Com- work for the federal government’s use mary or even an intended purpose of merce Committee, noted that ‘‘In the of electronic forms and electronic sig- this legislation, and worked to get the view of the Administration, the cur- natures. Today’s legislation is part of legislative process back on track. I am rent UETA draft adheres to the our continuing efforts to ease the bur- pleased that we were able to do this minimalist ‘enabling’ framework advo- dens of conducting business electroni- and that we were able to reach agree- cated by the Administration, and we cally. ment, for the second time, on an Abra- believe that UETA will provide an ex- This is an important bill on an issue ham-Leahy substitute that encourages cellent domestic legal model for elec- of paramount concern to American the continued expansion of electronic tronic transactions, as well as a strong businesses that engage in electronic commerce, while leaving in place es- model for the rest of the world.’’ commerce. It has had a long journey sential safeguards protecting the na- With these glowing endorsements of since it was reported by the Commerce tion’s consumers. both the Commerce Committee re- Committee in June. As reported, the ported measure and UETA, both of bill took a sweeping approach, pre- In a letter dated November 5, 1999, which provide legal certainty to elec- empting untold numbers of federal, the National Conference of State Leg- tronic records, I was surprised and dis- state and local laws that require con- islatures identified what it believed mayed that the Administration flip- tracts, records and signatures to be in were four essential criteria for any fed- flopped on the records issue at the last traditional written form. I was con- eral legislation related to electronic moment. One has to wonder what moti- cerned that such a sweeping approach signatures: vated this 180-degree change in position would radically undermine legislation (1) Any preemption of state law and au- and why the Administration went to that is currently in place to protect thority must be limited in duration. The great lengths to stall and eventually consumers. idea should be to ensure the validity of most oppose electronic transactions legisla- For example, the Committee-passed electronic signatures for a period of time, tion that included digital records. bill would have enabled businesses to thus giving the states time to act. (2) States
VerDate 29-OCT-99 05:21 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.128 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 S14884 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 19, 1999 must be allowed to adopt the Uniform Elec- making it easier for the proponent of late, nothing prevents companies from tronic Transactions Act or some similar leg- an electronic record or electronic sig- providing notices and disclosures to islation. (3) Essential state consumer protec- nature to prove its authenticity. By consumers electronically, so long as tions must be preserved, along with the ca- eliminating these rules, we have en- they also provide paper notices and dis- pacity of states to enact consumer protec- tion measures in the future. (4) Any federal sured that current contract and evi- closures in the limited set of cir- legislation must be limited to the topic of dence laws remain in place. A person is cumstances in which a law so requires. electronic signatures. It must not embrace always entitled to assert that an elec- Requirements that certain information any preemption of state regulatory and tronic signature is a forgery, was used be provided in a particular format, or record keeping authority. without authority, or otherwise is in- by a particular method of delivery, are The Abraham-Leahy substitute valid for reasons that would invalidate often adopted to serve consumers’ in- meets these criteria. the effect of a signature in written terests by providing them with infor- Most importantly, the scope of the form. mation critical to making informed bill has been limited to address the Having just last year worked with choices in the marketplace, under- principal concern of industry. When Senator KYL on passage of the Kyl- standing their rights and obligations Senator ABRAHAM introduced S.761 ear- Leahy substitute to S.512, the Identity during commercial transactions, and lier this year, he said it was designed Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act, enforcing their rights when trans- to eliminate uncertainty about the le- to combat identity theft, we should be actions go sour. Such laws should not gality of electronic contracts signed careful to avoid taking actions that be swept away without adequate assur- with electronic signatures. Consistent could have the unintended consequence ance that consumers will be able to re- with this design, the Abraham-Leahy of making such crimes easier to com- ceive and retain the information elec- mit. substitute ensures that contracts will tronically. In his introductory floor statement, not be denied legal effect that they The AARP made this point in a letter Senator ABRAHAM stressed that S.761 otherwise have under state law solely to all Senators dated November 15, was an interim measure, which would because they are in electronic form or 1999, with respect to the more provide a national baseline for the use because they were signed electroni- sweepingly preemptive H.R. 1714: ‘‘The of electronic signatures only until the cally. However, as section 4(4) of the states enacted their own e-signature time to investigate the implications of bill makes clear, an electronic signa- legislation. To ensure the temporary such a pivotal change in established ture is valid only if executed by a per- nature of the federal preemption, the consumer protections . . . is before, son who intended to sign the contract. Abraham-Leahy substitute which not after, legislation is enacted. Meas- The purpose of this legislation is to passes the Senate today includes a sig- ures to take advantage of electronic facilitate electronic commerce over the nificant change from earlier versions of market efficiencies must be tempered Internet. It is not intended that this S.761, including the version reported by by a concern for legal and techno- legislation be the basis for unfair or de- the Commerce Committee. The Com- logical responsibilities that are being ceptive attempts by some to avoid pro- mittee bill preempted a state’s laws shifted to the consumer.’’ viding mandated information, disclo- until the state enacted the Uniform The benefits of electronic commerce sures, notices or content. For example, Electronic Transactions Act (‘‘UETA’’) should not, and need not, come at the when the parties have conducted a as reported by the National Conference expense of increased risk to consumers. transaction entirely in person, the fine of Commissioners on Uniform State I commend the Department of Com- print of a form contract cannot include Law, or any variation that was ‘‘au- merce for its help in crafting a sub- an agreement that the contract can be thorized or provided for in such re- stitute amendment that is more care- provided electronically rather than on port.’’ The full Senate votes today on fully tailored to protect the interests paper. The basic rules of good faith and language that gives states more leeway of America’s consumers. I also thank fair dealing apply to electronic com- on the version of the UETA that they Senators SARBANES, who shared many merce, and this legislation is not in- choose to pass—including more leeway of my concerns about the original bill’s tended to be a basis upon which con- to adopt strong consumer protections. impact on consumers, and Senators sumers can be asked to agree to terms The revised definition is meant to ABRAHAM and WYDEN, for agreeing to and conditions for using electronic sig- cover the electronic transactions legis- address our concerns. natures and electronic records which lation passed earlier this year by the This bill shows what can be achieved are unreasonable based on the cir- State of California, and will preserve by bipartisan cooperation and com- cumstances surrounding the trans- the capacity of states to perform their promise. It enjoys broad support from action. traditional role in protecting the the Administration, the states, con- Further, accurate copies of contracts health and safety of their citizens. sumer representatives, and responsible must be delivered to consumers. The Nothing in this bill would allow any companies and trade associations that Abraham-Leahy substitute amendment of the notices that may accompany an care about their customers. I urge its therefore provides that if a law re- electronic contract to be provided elec- speedy enactment into law. quires a contract to be in writing, an tronically. This is especially important I ask unanimous consent to include electronic record of the contract will to ensure that consumers are apprised in the RECORD a Statement of Adminis- not satisfy such law unless it is deliv- of all their rights under federal and tration Policy dated November 8, 1999, ered to all parties in a form that can be state laws. It was the records language in support of the Abraham-Leahy sub- retained for later reference and used to of S.761 that held the greatest poten- stitute amendment; a letter dated No- prove the terms of the agreement. This tial to harm consumers, with its vember 8, 1999, from the National Auto- important provision is intended to pro- across-the-board invalidation of hard- mobile Dealers Association, and a let- tect consumers who execute contracts won consumer protections embodied in ter dated November 5, 1999, from the online, by ensuring that contracts are such laws as the Truth in Lending Act, National Conference of State Legisla- provided in a tamperproof, or ‘‘read- the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Real tures. only’’ format. The delivery of any Estate Settlement Procedures Act, and STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATION POLICY, other type of electronic record would others. I am pleased that the sponsors NOVEMBER 8, 1999 (SENATE) make it useless to prove its terms in of this legislation agreed to remove the (This statement has been coordinated by court. electronic records language so that we OMB with the concerned agencies.) The new legislation also improves on can allow the critical provisions re- S. 761—MILLENNIUM DIGITAL COMMERCE ACT the Committee-passed version by garding contracts and signatures to (ABRAHAM (R) MICHIGAN AND 11 COSPONSORS) eliminating its ‘‘intent’’ section, which move forward. There will be time in Electronic commerce can provide con- established interpretive rules regard- the coming months to revisit the sumers and businesses with significant bene- ing the intent of the parties to an elec- fits in terms of costs, choice, and conven- broader issue of electronic records, and ience. The Administration strongly supports tronic transaction. These rules inap- to craft legislation that will not place the development of this marketplace and propriately allowed businesses to put consumers at risk. supports legislation that will advance that the risk of forgery, unauthorized use, In the meantime, contrary to some of development, while providing appropriate and identity theft on consumers, by the rhetoric that has been heard of consumer protection. Many businesses and
VerDate 29-OCT-99 05:21 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G19NO6.104 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S14885 consumers are still wary of conducting ex- the federal rule. This exception would be By now, all of us have heard the pro- tensive business over the Internet because of necessary to ensure that the states could phetic pronouncements: ‘‘The Internet the lack of a predictable legal environment still perform their traditional role of estab- will change of all of our lives.’’ ‘‘The governing transactions. Both the Congress lishing the legal framework for major pur- Computer Age is reshaping the world.’’ and the Administration have been working chases. to address this important potential impedi- We appreciate the opportunity to bring our And so on. These words are true, and a ment to commerce. concerns to your attention, and we appre- review of the indicators which docu- S. 761 addresses important concerns associ- ciate all your efforts in addressing these ment the Internet’s extraordinary ated with electronic commerce and the rise matters before the legislation moves forward growth bear this out. In 1993 about of the Internet as a worldwide commercial in the Senate. 90,000 Americans had access to these forum and marketplace. The Administration Sincerely, on-line resources. By early 1999 that supports Senate passage of the amendment H. THOMAS GREENE, number had grown to about 81 million, in the nature of a substitute to S. 761 ex- Chief Operating Officer, Legislative Affairs. pected to be offered by Senator Abraham, an increase of about 900 percent. The based on an agreement with Senators Leahy NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF Computer Industry Almanac predicts and Wyden. The Administration supports STATE LEGISLATURES, 320 million Internet users world-wide this version of S. 761 because the bill, as pro- Washington, DC, November 5, 1999. by the end of the year 2000. posed to be amended, would: Ensure the legal Hon. PATRICK J. LEAHY And now the figures are coming in on validity of contracts between private parties Russell Senate Office Building, how electronic commerce is trans- that are made and signed electronically; pre- Washington, DC. forming the way we do business. They serve the ability of States to establish safe- DEAR SENATOR LEAHY: The National Con- ference of State Legislatures understands are equally impressive. E-commerce guards, such as consumer protection laws, to between businesses has grown to an es- promote the public interest in electronic the need to revise federal and state laws as commerce among private parties just as they a means of encouraging electronic com- timate $64.8 billion for 1999. 10 million can now establish safeguards for paper-based merce. In particular, NCSL understands that customers shopped for some product commerce; cover only commercial trans- legislation is needed to allow the more wide- using the Internet in 1998 alone. And 5.3 actions between private parties that affect spread use of electronic signatures as a million households had access to finan- interstate commerce; not affect Federal laws means of encouraging such commerce. cial transactions like electronic bank- or regulations, but instead would give Fed- Over 40 state legislatures have addressed various state law issues related to the valid- ing and stock trading by the end of eral agencies six months to conduct a careful 1999. study of barriers to electronic transactions ity of electronic signatures. Nevertheless, NCSL has in principle no objection to federal While the Internet has experienced under Federal laws or regulations and to de- legislation on this same topic, provided that almost exponential growth since its in- velop plans to remove such barriers, where it is tightly focused on removing barriers to appropriate; and sunset completely as to the ception, there is still room to expand. legitimate electronic commerce and does not law of any State that enacts the Uniform Today, new technologies enable the broadly preempt essential elements of state Electronic Transactions Act. Internet to serve as an efficient new consumer protection and contract law. NCSL believes that federal legislation re- tool for companies to transact business NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE DEALERS AS- lated to electronic signatures must meet as never before. This capability is pro- SOCIATION, OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE four criteria: (1) Any preemption of state law vided by the development of secure AFFAIRS, and authority must be limited in duration. electronic authentication methods. Washington, DC, November 8, 1999. The idea should be to ensure the validity of These technologies permit an indi- Hon. PATRICK J. LEAHY, most electronic signatures for a period of Ranking Member, Committee on the Judiciary, vidual to positively identify the person time, thus giving the states time to act. (2) with whom they are transacting busi- Dirksen Senate Office Building, Wash- States must be allowed to adopt the Uniform ington, DC. Electronic Transactions Act or some similar ness and to ensure that information DEAR SENATOR LEAHY: On behalf of the Na- legislation. (3) Essential state consumer pro- being shared by the parties has not tional Automobile Dealers Association tections must be preserved, along with the been tampered with or modified with- (NADA), I am writing to express our views on capacity of states to enact consumer protec- out the knowledge of both parties. S. 761, the Millennium Digital Commerce tion measures in the future. (4) Any federal While such technologies are seeing lim- Act. legislation must be limited to the topic of Like many entrepreneurs throughout the ited use today, the growth of this ap- electronic signatures. It must not embrace country, America’s new car and truck deal- plication has out-paced government’s any preemption of state regulatory and ers are using today’s technological advances record keeping authority. ability to appropriately modify the to better serve customers, and at NADA we The version of S. 761 that is now being pre- legal framework governing the use of understand the desire to accelerate the role sented comes closer to meeting NCSL’s cri- electronic signatures and other authen- of electronic commerce. Even so, we share teria than earlier versions of the bill. In gen- tication methods. your desire to preserve the state’s role in eral, this ‘‘compromise’’ version is taking The growth of electronic signature this process. the right approach to the issue. NCSL looks technologies will increasingly allow or- The automobile is one of the single biggest forward to working with the sponsors and purchases that a consumer makes. As a re- ganizations to enter into contractual others to resolve any remaining issues of arrangements without ever having to sult, state legislatures throughout the coun- preemption and consumer protection. NCSL try have enacted various requirements and much prefers the new compromise to other drive across town or fly thousands of disclosures governing the purchase and sale earlier versions of electronic signatures leg- miles to personally meet with a client of motor vehicles. In light of this extensive islation which we vigorously opposed be- or potential business partner. The body of existing state law, an overly preemp- cause of its unnecessary preemption of state Internet is prepared to go far beyond tive federal statute would deny the states consumer protection and contract law. the ability to buy a book or order ap- the ability to protect their citizens in the For additional information about NCSL’s parel on-line. It is ready to lead a revo- manner they deem appropriate in these types position, please call Neal Osten (202–624–8660) of transactions. or Michael Bird (202–624–8686). lution in the execution of business NADA does not oppose a temporary federal Sincerely, transactions which may involve thou- rule to ensure that contracts can not be in- Joanne G. Emmons, Michigan State Sen- sands or millions of dollars in products validated solely because they are in elec- ate, Chair, NCSL Commerce and Commu- or services; transactions so important tronic form or because they are signed elec- nications Committee. they require that both parties enter tronically. We believe, however, that any Mr. ABRAHAM. Mr. President, the into a legally binding contract. federal legislation should only be an interim Mr. President, the Millennium Dig- measure to provide stability while the states Senate is soon expected to pass the consider the Uniform Electronic Trans- Millennium Digital Commerce Act—a ital Commerce Act is designed to pro- actions Act (UETA). Once a state adopts the bill introduced by Senators WYDEN, mote the use of electronic signatures UETA, the temporary federal rule should MCCAIN, BURNS, LOTT and myself which in business transactions and contracts. sunset. is designed to promote electronic com- At present, the greatest barrier to such We understand that some drafts of the leg- merce. I rise today to speak in support transactions is the lack of a consistent islation that have been put forward would of this legislation and to thank the co- and predictable national framework of allow the federal rule to preempt the UETA rules governing the use of electronic in effect in a state, thus denying the states sponsors for their tireless efforts to the opportunity to be more protective of pass this legislation. I believe it will signatures. Over forty States have en- consumers should they so desire. If that pro- have a profound impact on the way acted electronic authentication laws, vision is retained, we believe that motor ve- commerce is conducted on the Inter- and no two laws are the same. This in- hicle transactions should not be covered by net. consistency deters businesses from
VerDate 29-OCT-99 05:56 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.129 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 S14886 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 19, 1999 fully utilizing electronic signature electronic signatures and authentica- this bill to address protection issues. In technologies for contracts and other tion technologies will be used in trans- particular, my colleagues were con- business transactions. The differences actions. cerned about the effects of this legisla- in our State laws create uncertainty Since the Internet is inherently an tion on the notification and disclosure about the effectiveness or legality of international medium, consideration requirements required by law. I under- an electronic contract signed with an must also be given to the manner in stand very well the concerns my col- electronic signature. This legal uncer- which the U.S. conducts business with leagues raised and I agree with many, tainty limits the potential of elec- overseas governments and businesses. but not all, of their conclusions. tronic commerce, and, thus, our na- This legislation therefore sets forth a I believe the use of electronic records tion’s economic growth. series of principles for the inter- in electronic transactions is crucial to Fortunately, the need for uniformity national use of electronic signatures. real growth in electronic commerce. in electronic authentication rules was In the last year, U.S. negotiators have And if e-commerce is to truly expand recognized early by the States. For the been meeting with the European Com- the opportunities for individuals, busi- past two years, the National Con- missioners to discuss electronic signa- nesses and consumers must have the ference of Commissioners on Uniform tures in international commerce. In freedom to agree to the types of docu- State Law, an organization comprised these negotiations, the U.S. Depart- ments and information they receive of e-commerce experts from the States, ment of Commerce and the State De- electronically. This right to choose to has been working to develop a uniform partment have worked in support of an receive records electronically must be system for the use of electronic signa- open system governing the use of au- provided by Congress. The best way to tures for all fifty States. Their prod- thentication technologies. Some Euro- do that is to pass laws which establish uct, the Uniform Electronic Trans- pean nations oppose this concept, how- legal certainties for the sending, re- actions Act, or UETA, was finished in ever. For example, Germany insists ceipt and storage for the broad range of July. As was expected, the UETA is an that electronic transactions involving electronic records, and in particular, excellent piece of work and I look for- a German company must utilize a Ger- for records associated with loans and ward to the day when this model legis- man electronic signature application. I mortgages. Today, a vacuum exists lation is enacted by each of the 50 applaud the Administration for their with respect to these records. Aggres- states. steadfast opposition to that approach. sive businesses and small banks are filling this vacuum by providing loans But agreement on the final language This bill will bolster and strengthen and mortgages electronically even of the UETA proposal is not the same the U.S. position in these international though there is question as to whether as enactment, and despite the hard negotiations by establishing the fol- such transactions are protected under work of the Commissioners, uniformity lowing principles as the will of the law. The increasing demand for such will not occur until all fifty States ac- Congress: services demonstrates the popularity tually enact the UETA. That will like- One, paper-based obstacles to elec- for electronic loans. By making appli- ly take some time. Because some State tronic transactions must be elimi- cations easier and reducing associated legislatures are not in session next nated. year and other States have more press- Two, parties to an electronic trans- consumer costs, these businesses are ing legislative items, it could take action should choose the electronic au- providing a service which is becoming increasingly popular with the Amer- three to four years for forty-five or thentication technology. ican public. Rather than ignore this fifty States to enact the UETA. When Third, parties to a transaction should new market, or worse, condemn it, you consider the changes that have have the opportunity to prove in court Congress should work with the indus- taken place in just the last two years, that their authentication approach and try and the proper regulatory agencies it is obvious that in the high-tech- transactions are valid. to ensure that these increased con- nology sector four years is an eternity. Fourth, the international approach The Digital Millennium Commerce to electronic signatures should take a sumer opportunities are maintained Act is therefore designed as an interim non-discriminatory approach to elec- and that relevant consumer protection measure to provide relief until the tronic signature. This will allow the provisions are modernized. I believe my proposal to permit individuals to opt-in States adopt the provisions of the fees market—not a government—to de- to the receipt of records and to opt-out UETA. It will provide companies the termine the type of authentication of receipt at any time represented rea- federal framework they need until a technologies used in international sonable middle ground on this issue, national baseline governing the use of commerce. and am disappointed that my col- electronic authentication exists at the Mr. President, it is my hope that leagues and I could not agree on a State level. Once States enact the adoption of these principles will in- framework for records based on this UETA, the Federal preemption is lift- crease the likelihood of an open, mar- ket-based international framework for model. ed. I intend to continue working toward To be specific, this legislation pro- electronic commerce. a resolution which will permit individ- motes electronic commerce in the fol- Finally, the bill directs the Depart- uals to have access to electronic ment of Commerce and Office of Man- lowing manner. First and foremost, the records. It is simply in the long-term agement and Budget to report on Fed- legislation provides that the electronic best interest of both consumers and the signatures used to agree to a contract eral laws and regulations that might economy. And I am sure I will not shall not be denied effect solely be- pose barriers to e-commerce and report labor on this effort alone. I am pleased cause they are electronic in nature. back to Congress on the impact of such to note that, among parties familiar This provision assures that a company provisions and provide suggestions for with this debate, there is growing sup- will be able to rely on an electronic reform. Such a report will serve as the port for legislation to quickly address contract and that another party will basis for Congressional action, or inac- this important issue. not be able to escape such certainty, tion, in the future. Mr. President, despite our philo- this bill will reduce the likelihood of Mr. President, Senator WYDEN, Sen- sophical differences, it was clear from dissatisfied parties attempting to es- ator MCCAIN, Senator BURNS, the Ma- the beginning that everyone involved cape electronic contractual agreements jority Leader and I worked very hard was interested in working coopera- and transactions. to address the multiple of issues and tively to enact good legislation. And To ensure a level playing field for all concerns raised by those most affected while I wish this bill could go further, types of authentication, the bill grants by this legislation, namely the high- I am nevertheless pleased with the parties to a transaction the freedom to tech industry, the states and the con- product that we have passed today. So determine the technologies to be used sumer. I also want to recognize the I want to thank Senator LEAHY and in the execution of an electronic con- considerable time and effort dedicated Senator SARBANES for their coopera- tract. In essence, this assures tech- to this legislation by Senator LEAHY, tion and hard work. I also want to rec- nology neutrality because businesses Senator HOLLINGS and Senator SAR- ognize the efforts of the Ranking Mem- and consumers, not government, will BANES. Senators LEAHY and SARBANES ber of the Commerce Committee, Sen- make the decisions as to what type of worked diligently with the sponsors of ator HOLLINGS. Senator HOLLINGS made
VerDate 29-OCT-99 05:21 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.132 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S14887 it clear very early that he had concerns now being handled by electronic The basic rules of good faith and fair surrounding the issue of preemption. means, cutting both costs and trans- dealing apply to electronic commerce, His staff and mine worked quickly and action times. These techniques will and this Act should not be the basis effectively to find common ground on make our overall economy more effi- upon which parties to a contract can be this legislation and his spirit of com- cient, and the benefits should eventu- asked to agree to terms and conditions promise allowed us to move forward on ally be passed on to consumers. for using electronic signatures and a bill that I do not doubt he would have The world of electronic commerce is electronic contracts which are unrea- written differently. I want to thank not without its problems, however. One sonable based on the circumstances him for his contribution. of the largest of these is the lack of co- surrounding the transaction. For ex- Finally, I wish to express my thanks herent legal framework for the conduct ample, when the parties have con- to the Technology Division of the of electronic transactions. The com- ducted a transaction entirely in per- State of Massachusetts. Governor Paul mercial world is governed by a patch- son, the fine print of a form contract Cellucci’s staff provided indispensable work of Federal, state, and local laws. should not include an agreement that counsel on existing State law gov- Because electronic commerce is such a the contract can be provided electroni- erning the use of electronic signatures recent phenomenon, it can be difficult cally rather than on paper. In addition, and the manner in which Federal law to apply existing commercial codes and companies must deliver to consumers can bolster or hamstring State con- statutes to these new kinds of trans- electronic records of the contract in a tract law. I value the Governor’s input actions. Often the laws are simply si- form they can receive, retain, and use and will continue to work with him to lent on electronic issues, leading to un- to prove the terms of an agreement. address the extent to which the States certainty for businesses and consumers Such an electronic record would have are impacted by this legislation as it alike. to be provided in a ‘‘locked,’’ or tamper One such area is electronic signa- advances. Of course, the business and proof, format. tures. Technology now exists that can technology sectors have also been cru- Regarding new laws on electronic cial in helping to craft this bill. Rep- replace written signatures on paper documents with computer code that transactions, the states have been en- resentatives from the Information performs the same functions. However, gaged for some time, through the Na- Technology Association of America, many states have not yet enacted laws tional Conference of Commissioners on Ford, the Coalition for Electronic Au- to ensure that digital signature tech- Uniform State Laws, in the formula- thentication, the Information Tech- nologies, when used in a reasonable and tion of a model Uniform Electronic nology Industry Council, Apple, the appropriate manner, will be considered Transactions Act (UETA). Versions of American Electronics Association, valid. According to business groups, the UETA will be enacted by the indi- NCR, America Online, the Electronic this uncertainty has had a dampening vidual states. The bill we are consid- Industry Alliance, Microsoft, Hewlett- effect on the growth of electronic com- ering today includes a revised defini- Packard, IBM and the National Asso- merce. tion of UETA, changed from the bill re- ciation of Manufacturers have each Many state legislatures are hard at ported by the Commerce Committee, lent their time and expertise to this ef- work to devise a workable, consistent that gives states more flexibility to fort. I appreciate their contributions legal framework for electronic records pass versions of UETA that best meet and look forward to continuing this ef- and signatures. Until their efforts are the needs of their citizens. It is in- fort to ensure that we develop the best complete, however, S. 761, the bill in- tended that California’s recently approach possible to promote use of troduced by Senator ABRAHAM, will passed version of UETA, for example, electronic signatures in business trans- serve as a stop-gap measure. It will meet this test. actions. provide a measure of legal certainty, I would like once again to thank my Mr. President, despite the great work while protecting the rights of con- colleagues, Senator ABRAHAM, Senator that has taken place here in the Sen- sumers under existing laws governing LEAHY, and Senator WYDEN for their ate, there is more work to do on this many types of transactions. hard work on this issue. I believe that legislation. The House is currently I am pleased to have worked closely we have reached an accommodation on working on a companion bill and I look with Senator ABRAHAM, Senator this legislation that provides industry forward to working with the Chairman LEAHY, Senator WYDEN, members of with the provisional legal certainty of the Commerce Committee and other the Commerce Committee, industry, they seek, while ensuring that existing Representatives to ensure that the leg- and consumer groups to craft a bill consumer laws are not diluted by the islation sent to the President for his that answers the legal need, yet pro- increasing use of electronic commerce. signature is the best and most effective vides for continued consumer protec- This is an important step toward mak- approach to expanding electronic com- tions. I would like briefly to describe ing our commercial laws ready for the merce possible. some of these critical consumer protec- twenty-first century. Mr. SARBANES. Mr. President, I rise tion aspects of the bill. Mr. LIEBERMAN. Mr. President, I today to discuss S. 761, the Third Mil- While electronic commerce can pro- rise today to express my support for lennium Digital Commerce Act. This is vide consumers with enormous bene- an important bill at a pivotal time in fits, a sad stream of news articles over the Millennium Digital Commerce Act our nation’s history. The rapid growth the past few years show clearly that of 1999. I thank Senators ABRAHAM, of the Internet, and its transformation there are unscrupulous operators on LEAHY, and WYDEN for their leadership from an academic research tool to a the Internet. The passage of this Act is on this important issue. As a cosponsor truly global communications network, intended to serve as a means of pro- of this legislation, I am proud of the is exerting its influence in more and tecting consumers from deceptive prac- steps it takes to support an important more areas of our daily lives. tices. and still emerging technology and in- One are of enormous change is the To provide businesses with greater dustry. The Millennium Digital Com- way in which Americans buy, sell, and legal certainty, the bill stipulates that merce Act will facilitate the continued trade products and services. Just as the contracts cannot be deemed unenforce- growth of the Internet and of elec- general store gave way to the shopping able solely because they involved the tronic commerce. With this legislation, mall and mail order catalogues, these use of an electronic signature. Under the Senate recognizes the significant now ‘‘traditional’’ forms of retailing this bill, companies and consumers transformations taking place in our are being supplanted by electronic should only be able to agree to reason- economy and how we do business today commerce over the Internet. Elec- able and appropriate electronic signa- and into the future. tronic retailers are providing con- ture technologies that provide ade- I think we all recognize that we are sumers with a broad range of new quate security to both parties. How- witnessing an electronic revolution. choices in goods and services. ever, as the definition of the electronic There is no shortage of statistics to Electronic transactions are also be- signature makes clear, the electronic prove what we are seeing all around us. coming an integral part of business-to- signature is only valid under this Act if According to a recent U.S. Department business relationships. Ordering, bill- the person intended to sign the con- of Commerce report, approximately ing, and a host of other activities are tract. one third of the U.S. economic growth
VerDate 29-OCT-99 05:21 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.134 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 S14888 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 19, 1999 in the past few years has come from in- have to wait in line for things like a Choice of technology: It does not dic- formation technologies (over $1.1 tril- driver’s license or construction permit, tate the type of electronic signature lion). Just this year, venture capital- could see their business expedited by a technology to be used; it allows the ists have invested more than $8 billion few clicks of their mouse. parties to a transaction to choose their in Internet companies—twice the rate We live in an increasingly mobile so- own authentication technology. of last year. ciety, where young people get recruited Consumer protections: It protects According to a University of Texas for jobs clear across the country. They consumer rights under State laws; it report, e-commerce is growing at a may need to move in a hurry but don’t does not preempt State consumer pro- much faster rate than many had ex- have the time, for example, to pack up tection laws. It assures that consumers pected. The digital economy generated a home in Virginia and look for an- without a computer are not treated as more than $300 billion in revenue in other one in Portland, Oregon. With second class citizens. If a consumer 1998 and was responsible for 1.2 million the Internet, they can shop for a house buys a car online, the consumer cannot jobs. Many e-commerce companies in in another town. With this electronic be forced to use the computer to re- my State of Connecticut, like Micro- signatures bill, they can pretty much ceive important recall or safety notices Warehouse in Norwalk, Coastal Tool & conclude the whole transaction of pur- but retains the option to continue to Supply in West Hartford, and chasing the house online. get such notices through the mail. Sagemaker Inc. of Fairfield, are lead- The legislation puts electronic and No State preemption: Its provisions ing the way in the digital economy. paper contracts and agreements on sunset when a State enacts UETA. In the Senate, I have worked to sup- equal footing legally. Like the Internet Excludes matters of family law: It port the growth of e-commerce by co- Tax Freedom Act, the bill would estab- specifically excludes agreements relat- sponsoring the Internet Tax Freedom lish technological neutrality between ing to marriage, adoption, premarital Act which places a three year morato- electronic and paper contracts and agreements, divorce, residential land- rium on new state and local taxes on agreements. This means consumers lord-tenant matters because these are the Internet in order to give the digital will enjoy the same legal protections not commercial transactions. economy some breathing room to when purchasing a car or home online Report on Federal statutory barriers evolve. as when they walk into an auto dealer- to electronic transactions: It requires OMB to report to Congress 18 months This legislation takes further steps ship or real estate office and sign all after enactment identifying statutory to continue the growth of e-commerce the documents in person. We worked barriers to electronic transactions and and is a powerful follow-on to the long and hard to make sure that the recommending legislation to remove Internet Tax Freedom Act. With this system established here benefits con- legislation we will eliminate a major such barriers. sumers who wish to receive informa- In conclusion, M. President, I wish to barrier to e-commerce by providing for tion electronically without treating acknowledge the leadership of Sen. the legal recognition of electronic sig- those without computers as second ABRAHAM in moving this legislation natures in contracting and by creating class citizens. forward. He and I have teamed up suc- a consistent, but temporary, national This legislation does not address the cessfully on other legislation, and it electronic signatures law to preempt a issue of electronic records because this was a pleasure to work with him and multitude of sometimes inconsistent matter deserves more thorough study his tireless staff on this bill. I also state laws. This bill is technology neu- and discussion. I intend to work with want to recognize the contribution of tral, allowing contracting parties to all interested parties on this—from Senator LEAHY, particularly with re- determine the appropriate electronic consumer groups to financial services gard to the consumer protection provi- signature technology for their trans- firms—over the course of the coming sions, as well as the effort of Senator action. Importantly, this legislation is months to craft legislation that will HOLLINGS. It took a bipartisan team to the result of thoughtful compromise. It extend the benefits of this measure to get this bill through the Senate today, gives electronic signatures more legal electronic records in a way that con- and I look forward to continuing to certainty but also provides for con- tinues consumer protections. work with this team as we go to con- sumer protection. It deals with elec- Commercial transactions have tradi- ference with the House on S. 761. tronic signatures only in creating con- tionally been governed by State laws I ask unanimous consent that my tracts. It preempts state law only until which are modeled on the Uniform statement be printed in the record fol- the states enact their own statutes and Commercial Code. Forty-two states lowing Senator ABRAHAM’s statement standards as provided for by the Uni- have some law in place relating to dig- on the passage of S. 761. form Electronic Transactions Act ital authentication. But differences be- Mr. LIEBERMAN. Mr. President, I (UETA). tween and among these laws can create rise today to express my support for Mr. President, I would like to thank confusion for e-entrepreneurs. The the Millennium Digital Commerce Act those who have worked so diligently to unstoppable growth of electronic com- of 1999. I thank Senators ABRAHAM, create this Act. Through the consid- merce has led the States recently to LEAHY, and WYDEN for their leadership erate and collaborative approach of develop a Uniform Electronic Trans- on this important issue. As a cosponsor several of my colleagues, including actions Act, or UETA (as part of the of this legislation, I am proud of the Senators ABRAHAM, LEAHY, and WYDEN, Uniform Commercial Code), to serve as steps it takes to support an important we now have legislation with language a model for each State legislature in and still emerging technology and in- that achieves a broad public purpose. developing further its own electronic dustry. The Millennium Digital Com- We are now able to continue supporting signatures law. However, only one merce Act will facilitate the continued the growth and evolution of electronic State—California—has enacted a growth of the Internet and of elec- commerce and technologies that will UETA. The purpose of this legislation tronic commerce. With this legislation, effectively bring us into the next cen- is to provide interim Federal legal va- the Senate recognizes the significant tury. lidity for electronic contracts and transformations taking place in our Mr. WYDEN. Mr. President, for the agreements until each state enacts its economy and how we do business today past several years, Congress has been own UETA. This means e-commerce and into the future. working in a bipartisan way to write will not be hamstrung by the lack of I think we all recognize that we are the rules of the digital economy. We legal standing. witnessing an electronic revolution. have made significant progress on I would like to take a minute to run There is no shortage of statistics to Internet taxes, privacy, encryption and through the highlights of S. 761: prove what we are seeing all around us. the Y2K problem. Now is the time to Technological neutrality: It allows According to a recent U.S. Department move forward on rules for electronic electronic signatures to replace writ- of Commerce report, approximately signatures. ten signatures. In interstate commerce one third of the U.S. economic growth The bill before us today, S. 761, is a contract cannot be denied legal effect in the past few years has come from in- based on the premise that it’s better to solely because of an electronic signa- formation technologies (over $1.1 tril- be online than waiting in line. A grow- ture, electronic record or an electronic lion). Just this year, venture capital- ing number of Americans who now agent was used in its formation. ists have invested more than $8 billion
VerDate 29-OCT-99 05:21 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G19NO6.103 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S14889 in Internet companies—twice the rate UNANIMOUS-CONSENT AGREEMENT from general church assets, or purchases in- surance coverage with general church assets, of last year. Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I ask According to a University of Texas or both. unanimous consent at 4 p.m. the Sen- (b) STATE INSURANCE LAW.—A State insur- report, e-commerce is growing at a ate proceed to the Work Incentives ance law described in this subsection is a law much faster rate than many had ex- conference report, and that there be 120 that— pected. The digital economy generated minutes equally divided in the usual (1) requires a church plan, or an organiza- more than $300 billion in revenue in form, with an additional 10 minutes tion described in section 414(e)(3)(A) of the 1998 and was responsible for 1.2 million Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and section under the control of Senator LOTT. I 3(33)(C)(i) of the Employee Retirement In- jobs. Many e-commerce companies in further ask consent that following the my State of Connecticut, like Micro- come Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. use or yielding back of time, the vote 1002(33)(C)(i)) to the extent that it is admin- Warehouse in Norwalk, Coastal Tool & on the adoption of the conference re- istering or funding such a plan, to be li- Supply in West Hartford, and port occur immediately following the censed; or Sagemaker Inc. of Fairfield, are lead- vote on adoption of the conference re- (2) relates solely to the solvency or insol- ing the way in the digital economy. port to accompany H.R. 3195. vency of a church plan (including participa- In the Senate, I have worked to sup- tion in State guaranty funds and associa- The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without tions). port the growth of e-commerce by co- objection, it is so ordered. sponsoring the Internet Tax Freedom (c) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this sec- Ms. COLLINS. I further ask consent tion: Act which places a three year morato- immediately following the vote on the (1) CHURCH PLAN.—The term ‘‘church plan’’ rium on new state and local taxes on adoption of the conference report, H. has the meaning given such term by section the Internet in order to give the digital Con. Res. 236 be agreed to, and the mo- 414(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 economy some breathing room to tion to reconsider be laid upon the and section 3(33) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. evolve. table. This legislation takes further steps 1002(33)). The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without to continue the growth of e-commerce (2) REIMBURSES COSTS FROM GENERAL objection, it is so ordered. and is a powerful follow-on to the CHURCH ASSETS.—The term ‘‘reimburses costs f from general church assets’’ means engaging Internet Tax Freedom Act. With this in an activity that is not the spreading of legislation we will eliminate a major CHURCH PLAN PARITY AND EN- risk solely for the purposes of the provisions barrier to e-commerce by providing for TANGLEMENT PREVENTION ACT of State insurance laws described in sub- the legal recognition of electronic sig- OF 1999 section (b). natures in contracting and by creating Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I ask (3) WELFARE PLAN.—The term ‘‘welfare plan’’— a consistent, but temporary, national unanimous consent the health com- electronic signatures law to preempt a (A) means any church plan to the extent mittee be discharged from further con- that such plan provides medical, surgical, or multitude of sometimes inconsistent sideration of S. 1309 and that the Sen- hospital care or benefits, or benefits in the state laws. This bill is technology neu- ate proceed to its immediate consider- event of sickness, accident, disability, death tral, allowing contracting parties to ation. or unemployment, or vacation benefits, ap- determine the appropriate electronic The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without prenticeship or other training programs, or signature technology for their trans- objection, it is so ordered. day care centers, scholarship funds, or pre- action. Importantly, this legislation is The clerk will report the bill by title. paid legal services; and (B) does not include any entity, such as a the result of thoughtful compromise. It The legislative clerk read as follows: gives electronic signatures more legal health insurance issuer described in section A bill (S. 1309) to amend title I of the Em- 9832(b)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of certainty but also provides for con- ployee Retirement Income Security Act of 1986 or a health maintenance organization sumer protection. It deals with elec- 1974 to provide for the preemption of State described in section 9832(b)(3) of such Code, tronic signatures only in creating con- law in certain cases relating to certain or any other organization that does business tracts. It preempts state law only until church plans. with the church plan or organization spon- the states enact their own statutes and There being no objection, the Senate soring or maintaining such a plan. standards as provided for by the Uni- proceeded to consider the bill. (d) ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY.—Notwith- form Electronic Transactions Act standing any other provision of this section, AMENDMENT NO. 2788 for purposes of enforcing provisions of State (UETA). (Purpose: To provide for a complete insurance laws that apply to a church plan Mr. President, I thank those who substitute) that is a welfare plan, the church plan shall have worked so diligently to create Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, there is be subject to State enforcement as if the this Act. Through the considerate and a substitute amendment at the desk church plan were an insurer licensed by the collaborative approach of several of my State. submitted by Senators SESSIONS and colleagues, including Senators ABRA- (e) APPLICATION OF SECTION.—Except as JEFFORDS. I ask for its consideration. provided in subsection (d), the application of HAM, LEAHY, and WYDEN, we now have The PRESIDING OFFICER. The this section is limited to determining the legislation with language that achieves clerk will report. status of a church plan that is a welfare plan a broad public purpose. We are now The legislative clerk read as follows: under the provisions of State insurance laws able to continue supporting the growth described in subsection (b). This section The Senator from Maine [Ms. COLLINS] for and evolution of electronic commerce shall not otherwise be construed to recharac- Mr. SESSIONS, for himself, and Mr. JEFFORDS, terize the status, or modify or affect the and technologies that will effectively proposes an amendment numbered 2788. bring us into the next century. rights, of any plan participant or bene- The amendment is as follows: ficiary, including participants or bene- Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I ask ficiaries who make plan contributions. unanimous consent the committee Strike all after the enacting clause and in- sert the following: Ms. COLLINS. I ask unanimous con- amendment in the nature of a sub- sent that the amendment be agreed to. stitute be agreed to as amended, the SECTION 1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this Act is only to clarify The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without bill be read the third time and passed, the application to a church plan that is a objection, it is so ordered. the motion to reconsider laid upon the welfare plan of State insurance laws that re- The amendment (No. 2788) was agreed table, and any statements be printed in quire or solely relate to licensing, solvency, to. the RECORD. insolvency, or the status of such plan as a Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I ask The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without single employer plan. unanimous consent the bill be read the objection, it is so ordered. SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF CHURCH WELFARE third time and passed, as amended, the The committee amendment in the PLAN STATUS UNDER STATE INSUR- motion to reconsider be laid upon the ANCE LAW. nature of a substitute was agreed to. table and any statements be printed in The bill (S. 761), as amended, was (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of deter- mining the status of a church plan that is a the RECORD. read the third time and passed, as fol- welfare plan under provisions of a State in- The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without lows: surance law described in subsection (b), such objection, it is so ordered. [The bill was not available for print- a church plan (and any trust under such The bill (S. 1309), as amended, was ing. It will appear in a future edition of plan) shall be deemed to be a plan sponsored read the third time and passed, as fol- the RECORD.] by a single employer that reimburses costs lows:
VerDate 29-OCT-99 05:21 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G19NO6.148 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 S14890 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 19, 1999 S. 1309 terize the status, or modify or affect the that we need to do better to combat Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Rep- rights, of any plan participant or bene- this theft, both with enforcement of resentatives of the United States of America in ficiary, including participants or bene- our current copyright laws and with Congress assembled, ficiaries who make plan contributions. strengthened copyright laws to deter SECTION 1. PURPOSE. Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, the Sen- potential infringes. The purpose of this Act is only to clarify ate is today passing an important bill, The Hatch-Leahy-Schumer ‘‘Digital the application to a church plan that is a S. 1257, the Hatch-Leahy-Schumer Theft Deterrence and Copyright Dam- welfare plan of State insurance laws that re- ‘‘Digital Theft Deterrence and Copy- ages Improvement Act’’ would help quire or solely relate to licensing, solvency, right Damages Improvement Act of provide additional deterrence by insolvency, or the status of such plan as a single employer plan. 1999.’’ This legislation should help our amending the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. copyright industries, which in turn SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF CHURCH WELFARE § 504(c), to increase the amounts of PLAN STATUS UNDER STATE INSUR- helps both those who are employed in statutory damages recoverable for ANCE LAW. those industries and those who enjoy copyright infringements. These (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of deter- the wealth of consumer products, in- amounts were last increased in 1988 mining the status of a church plan that is a cluding books, magazines, movies, and when the United States acceded to the welfare plan under provisions of a State in- computer software, that makes the vi- Berne Convention. Specifically, the bill surance law described in subsection (b), such brant culture of this country the envy a church plan (and any trust under such would increase the cap on statutory plan) shall be deemed to be a plan sponsored of the world. This legislation has al- damages by 50 percent, raising the min- by a single employer that reimburses costs ready traveled an unnecessarily bumpy imum from $500 to $750 and raising the from general church assets, or purchases in- road to get to this stage, and it is my maximum from $20,000 to $30,000. In ad- surance coverage with general church assets, hope that it will be sent promptly to dition, the bill would raise from or both. the President’s desk. $100,000 to $150,000 the amount of statu- (b) STATE INSURANCE LAW.—A State insur- On July 1, 1999, the Senate passed tory damages for willful infringements. ance law described in this subsection is a law four intellectual property bills which Courts determining the amount of that— Senator HATCH and I had joined in in- statutory damages in any given case (1) requires a church plan, or an organiza- tion described in section 414(e)(3)(A) of the troducing and which the Judiciary would have discretion to impose dam- Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and section Committee had unanimously reported. ages within these statutory ranges at 3(33)(C)(i) of the Employee Retirement In- Each of these bills (S. 1257, which we just and appropriate levels, depending come Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. consider today; S. 1258, the Patent Fee on the harm caused, ill-gotten profits 1002(33)(C)(i)) to the extent that it is admin- Integrity and Innovation Protection obtained and the gravity of the offense. istering or funding such a plan, to be li- Act; S. 1259, the Trademark Amend- The bill preserves provisions of the cur- censed; or ments Act; and S. 1260, the Copyright rent law allowing the court to reduce (2) relates solely to the solvency or insol- Act Technical Corrections Act) make the award of statutory damages to as vency of a church plan (including participa- tion in State guaranty funds and associa- important improvements to our intel- little as $200 in cases of innocent in- tions). lectual property laws, and I congratu- fringement and requiring the court to (c) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this sec- late Senator HATCH for his leadership remit damages in certain cases involv- tion: in moving these bills promptly through ing nonprofit educational institutions, (1) CHURCH PLAN.—The term ‘‘church plan’’ the Committee. libraries, archives, or public broad- has the meaning given such term by section Three of those four bills then passed casting entities. 414(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 the House without amendment and Finally, the bill provides authority and section 3(33) of the Employee Retirement were signed by the President on August for the Sentencing Commission expedi- Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1002(33)). 5, 1999. The House sent back to the Sen- tiously to fulfill its responsibilities (2) REIMBURSES COSTS FROM GENERAL ate S. 1257, the Digital Theft Deter- under the No Electronic Theft Act, CHURCH ASSETS.—The term ‘‘reimburses costs rence and Copyright Damages Improve- which directed the Commission to en- from general church assets’’ means engaging ment Act, with two modifications sure that the guidelines provide for in an activity that is not the spreading of which I will describe below. consideration of the retail value and risk solely for the purposes of the provisions I have long been concerned about re- quantity of the items with respect to of State insurance laws described in sub- ducing the levels of software piracy in which the intellectual property offense section (b). this country and around the world. The was committed. Since the time that (3) WELFARE PLAN.—The term ‘‘welfare theft of digital copyrighted works and, plan’’— this law became effective, the Sen- (A) means any church plan to the extent in particular, of software, results in tencing Commission has not had a full that such plan provides medical, surgical, or lost jobs to American workers, lost slate of Commissioners serving. In fact, hospital care or benefits, or benefits in the taxes to Federal and State govern- we have had no Commissioners since event of sickness, accident, disability, death ments, and lost revenue to American October, 1998. This situation was cor- or unemployment, or vacation benefits, ap- companies. A recent report released by rected last week with the confirmation prenticeship or other training programs, or the Business Software Alliance esti- of seven new Commissioners. day care centers, scholarship funds, or pre- mates that worldwide theft of copy- As I noted, the House amended the paid legal services; and righted software in 1998 amounted to version of S. 1257 that the Senate (B) does not include any entity, such as a health insurance issuer described in section nearly $11 billion. According to the re- passed in July in two ways. First, the 9832(b)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of port, if this ‘‘pirated software has in- original House version of this legisla- 1986 or a health maintenance organization stead been legally purchased, the in- tion, H.R. 1761, contained a new pro- described in section 9832(b)(3) of such Code, dustry would have been able to employ posed enhanced penalty for infringers or any other organization that does business 32,700 more people. In 2008, if software who engage in a repeated pattern of in- with the church plan or organization spon- piracy remains at its current rate, fringement, but without any scienter soring or maintaining such a plan. 52,700 jobs will be lost in the core soft- requirement. I shared the concerns (d) ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY.—Notwith- ware industry.’’ This theft also reflects raised by the Copyright Office that this standing any other provision of this section, for purposes of enforcing provisions of State losses of $991 million in tax revenue in provision, absent a willfulness scienter insurance laws that apply to a church plan the United States. requirement, would permit imposition that is a welfare plan, the church plan shall These statistics about the harm done of the enhanced penalty even against be subject to State enforcement as if the to our economy by the theft of copy- person who negligently, albeit repeat- church plan were an insurer licensed by the righted software alone, prompted me to edly, engaged in acts of infringement. State. introduce the ‘‘Criminal Copyright Im- Consequently, the Hatch-Leahy-Schu- (e) APPLICATION OF SECTION.—Except as provement Act’’ in both the 104th and mer bill, S. 1257, that we sent to the provided in subsection (d), the application of 105th Congresses, and to work for pas- House in July avoided casting such a this section is limited to determining the status of a church plan that is a welfare plan sage of this legislation, which was fi- wide net, which could chill legitimate under the provisions of State insurance laws nally enacted as the ‘‘No Electronic fair uses of copyrighted works. Instead, described in subsection (b). This section Theft Act of 1997,’’ Pub. L. 105–147. The the bill we sent to the House would shall not otherwise be construed to recharac- current rates of software piracy show have created a new tier of statutory
VerDate 29-OCT-99 06:08 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.097 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S14891 damages allowing a court to award tions posed at their confirmation hear- ‘‘(C) allow the borrower to obtain a loan, in damages in the amount of $250,000 per ings, each of the nominated Sentencing addition to any other outstanding loans infringed work where the infringement Commissioners indicated that they under this title, to pay any amounts due on is part of a willful and repeated pattern would make this issue a priority. For a shared appreciation agreement, at a rate of interest that is not greater than the rate of or practice of infringement. The entire example, Judge William Sessions of the interest on outstanding marketable obliga- ‘‘pattern and practice’’ provision, District of Vermont specifically noted tions of the United States of a maturity which originated in the House, has that: comparable to that of the loan.’’. been removed from the version of S. If confirmed, our first task must be to ad- (b) APPLICATION.—The amendment made by 1257 sent back to the Senate. dress Congress’ longstanding directives, in- subsection (a) shall apply to a shared appre- Second, the original House version of cluding implementation of the guidelines ciation arrangement entered into under sec- this legislation provided a direction to pursuant to the NET Act. Congress directed tion 353(e) of the Consolidated Farm and the Sentencing Commission to amend the Sentencing Commission to fashion guide- Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 2001(e)) the guidelines to provide an enhance- lines under the NET Act that are sufficiently that matures on or after the date of enact- ment of this Act. ment based upon the retail price of the severe to deter such criminal activity. I per- sonally favor addressing penalties under this Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I ask legitimate items that are infringed and statute expeditiously. the quantity of the infringing items. I unanimous consent the amendment be was concerned that this direction I fully concur in the judgment of agreed to, the bill be read the third would require the Commission and, ul- Chairman HATCH that the Sentencing time and passed as amended, the mo- timately, sentencing judges to treat Commission directive provision added tion to reconsider be laid upon the similarly a wide variety of infringe- by the House and to send, again, S. 1257 table, and that any statements be ment crimes, no matter the type and to the House for action. printed in the RECORD. magnitude of harm. This was a problem This bill represents an improvement The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without we avoided in the carefully crafted in current copyright law, and I hope objection, it is so ordered. The amendment (No. 2789) was agreed Sentencing Commission directive origi- that it will soon be sent to the Presi- to. nally passed as part of the No Elec- dent for enactment. The bill (S. 961), as amended, was tronic Theft Act. Consequently, the f read the third time and passed, as fol- version of S. 1257 passed by the Senate TO AMEND THE CONSOLIDATED lows: in July did not include the directive to FARM AND RURAL DEVELOP- [The bill was not available for print- the Sentencing Commission. The House MENT ACT ing. It will appear in a future edition of then returned S. 1257 with the same Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I ask the RECORD.] problematic directive to the Sen- unanimous consent the Agriculture f tencing Commission. Committee be discharged from further I appreciate that my House col- COPYRIGHT DAMAGES consideration of S. 961, and the Senate leagues and interested stakeholders IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1999 proceed to its immediate consider- have worked over the past months to ation. Ms. COLLINS. I ask unanimous con- address my concerns over the breadth The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without sent the Chair lay before the Senate a of the proposed directive to the Sen- objection, it is so ordered. message from the House to accompany tencing Commission, and to find a bet- The clerk will report the bill by title. S. 1257. ter definition of the categories of cases The legislative clerk read as follows: The PRESIDING OFFICER laid be- in which it would be appropriate to fore the Senate the following message compute the applicable sentencing A bill (S. 961) to amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act to im- from the House of Representatives: guideline based upon the retail value of prove shared appreciation arrangements. Resolved, That the bill from the Senate (S. the infringed upon item. A better solu- There being no objection, the Senate 1257) entitled ‘‘An Act to amend statutory tion than the one contained in the No damages provisions of title 17, United States Electronic Theft Act remains elusive, proceeded to consider the bill. Code’’, do pass with the following amend- however. AMENDMENT NO. 2789 ment: For example, one recent proposal (Purpose: To provide a substitute Strike out all after the enacting clause and seeks to add to S. 1257 a direction to amendment) insert: the Sentencing Commission to enhance Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, there is SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. the guideline offense level for copy- a substitute amendment at the desk This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Copyright Dam- ages Improvement Act of 1999’’. right and trademark infringements submitted by Senator BURNS, and I ask for its consideration. SEC. 2. STATUTORY DAMAGES ENHANCEMENT. based upon the retail price of the le- Section 504(c) of title 17, United States Code, gitimate products multiplied by the The PRESIDING OFFICER. The is amended— quantity of the infringing products, ex- clerk will report. (1) in paragraph (1)— cept where ‘‘the infringing products are The legislative clerk read as follows: (A) by striking ‘‘$500’’ and inserting ‘‘$750’’; substantially inferior to the infringed The Senator from Maine [Ms. COLLINS] for and upon products and there is substantial Mr. BURNS, proposes an amendment num- (B) by striking ‘‘$20,000’’ and inserting bered 2789. ‘‘$30,000’’; and price disparity between the legitimate (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘$100,000’’ products and the infringing products.’’ The amendment is as follows: and inserting ‘‘$150,000’’. This proposed direction appears to be Strike all after the enacting clause and in- SEC. 3. SENTENCING COMMISSION GUIDELINES. under-inclusive since it would not sert the following: Section 2(g) of the No Electronic Theft (NET) allow a guideline enhancement in cases SECTION 1. SHARED APPRECIATION ARRANGE- Act (28 U.S.C. 994 note) is amended by striking where fake goods are passed off as the MENTS. paragraph (2) and inserting the following: real item to unsuspecting consumers, (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 353(e) of the Con- ‘‘(2) In implementing paragraph (1), the Sen- even though this is clearly a situation solidated Farm and Rural Development Act tencing Commission shall amend the guideline (7 U.S.C. 2001(e)) is amended by striking in which the Commission may decide applicable to criminal infringement of a copy- paragraph (2) and inserting the following: right or trademark to provide an enhancement to provide an enhancement. ‘‘(2) TERMS.—A shared appreciation agree- based upon the retail price of the legitimate In view of the fact that the full Sen- ment entered into by a borrower under this items that are infringed upon and the quantity tencing Commission has not had an op- subsection shall— of the infringing items. To the extent the con- portunity for the past two years to ‘‘(A) have a term not to exceed 10 years; duct involves a violation of section 2319A of title consider and implement the original ‘‘(B) provide for recapture based on the dif- 18, United States Code, the enhancement shall direction in the No Electronic Theft ference between— be based upon the retail price of the infringing Act, passing a new and flawed directive ‘‘(i) the appraised value of the real security items and the quantity of the infringing items. appears to be both unnecessary and un- property at the time of restructuring; and ‘‘(3) Paragraph (1) shall be implemented not ‘‘(ii) that value at the time of recapture, later than 3 months after the later of— wise. This is particularly the case since except that that value shall not include the ‘‘(A) the first day occurring after May 20, the new Commissioners have already value of any capital improvements made to 1999; or indicated a willingness to consider this the real security property by the borrower ‘‘(B) the first day after the date of the enact- issue promptly. In response to ques- after the time of restructuring; and ment of this paragraph,
VerDate 29-OCT-99 06:08 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 6333 E:\CR\FM\G19NO6.102 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 S14892 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 19, 1999 on which sufficient members of the Sentencing waste, and abuse in the Federal Government; (B) if that council is eliminated, by a majority Commission have been confirmed to constitute a and vote of the inspector generals created under the quorum. (2) independence is vital for an Inspector Gen- Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.). ‘‘(4) The Commission shall promulgate the eral to function effectively. (c) SEPARATE APPROPRIATIONS ACCOUNT.— guidelines or amendments provided for under (b) ESTABLISHMENT OF INSPECTOR GENERAL.— Section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, is this section in accordance with the procedures The Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. amended by adding at the end the following: set forth in section 21(a) of the Sentencing Act App.) is amended— ‘‘(33) a separate appropriation account for ap- of 1987, as though the authority under that Act (1) in section 8G(a)(2) by striking ‘‘the Ten- propriations for the Inspectors General Criminal had not expired.’’. nessee Valley Authority,’’; and Investigator Academy and the Inspectors Gen- SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. (2) in section 11— eral Forensic Laboratory of the Department of The amendments made by section 2 shall (A) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘or the Com- the Treasury.’’. apply to any action brought on or after the date missioner of Social Security, Social Security Ad- (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— of the enactment of this Act, regardless of the ministration;’’ and inserting ‘‘the Commissioner There are authorized to carry out this section date on which the alleged activity that is the of Social Security, Social Security Administra- such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year basis of the action occurred. tion; or the Board of Directors of the Tennessee 2001 and each fiscal year thereafter. Valley Authority;’’; and Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I ask AMENDMENT NO. 2790 (B) in paragraph (2) by striking ‘‘or the Social (Purpose: To provide for the promulgation of Security Administration;’’ and inserting ‘‘the unanimous consent that the committee emergency guidelines by the United States Social Security Administration, or the Tennessee substitute be agreed to, the bill be read Sentencing Commission relating to crimi- Valley Authority;’’. the third time and passed, the motion nal infringement of a copyright or trade- (c) EXECUTIVE SCHEDULE POSITION.—Section to reconsider be laid upon the table, mark, and for other purposes) 5315 of title 5, United States Code, is amended and any statements related to the bill Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I ask by inserting after the item relating to the In- be printed in the RECORD. unanimous consent that the Senate spector General of the Small Business Adminis- The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without concur in the House amendment with a tration the following: objection, it is so ordered. ‘‘Inspector General, Tennessee Valley Author- further amendment which is at the ity.’’. The committee amendment in the desk. (d) EFFECTIVE DATE AND APPLICATION.— nature of a substitute was agreed to. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by The bill (S. 1707), as amended, was clerk will report. this section shall take effect 30 days after the read the third time and passed, as fol- The legislative clerk read as follows: date of enactment of this Act. lows: (2) INSPECTOR GENERAL.—The person serving The Senator from Maine [Ms. COLLINS] for S. 1707 as Inspector General of the Tennessee Valley Mr. HATCH, for himself, and Mr. LEAHY, pro- Authority on the effective date of this section— Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Rep- poses an amendment numbered 2790. (A) may continue such service until the Presi- resentatives of the United States of America in The amendment is as follows: dent makes an appointment under section 3(a) Congress assembled, On page 1, line 2, insert ‘‘Digital Theft De- of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. SECTION 1. THE TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY terrence and’’ before ‘‘Copyright’’. App.) consistent with the amendments made by AS AN ESTABLISHMENT UNDER THE this section; and INSPECTOR GENERAL ACT OF 1978. On page 2, strike lines 2 through 26 and in- (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds that— sert the following: (B) shall be subject to section 8G (c) and (d) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. (1) Inspectors General serve an important Within 120 days after the date of the enact- function in preventing and eliminating ment of this Act, or within 120 days after the App.) as applicable to the Board of Directors of the Tennessee Valley Authority, unless that per- fraud, waste, and abuse in the Federal Gov- first date on which there is a sufficient num- ernment; and ber of voting members of the Sentencing son is appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to be In- (2) independence is vital for an Inspector Commission to constitute a quorum, which- General to function effectively. ever is later, the Commission shall promul- spector General of the Tennessee Valley Author- ity. (b) ESTABLISHMENT OF INSPECTOR GEN- gate emergency guideline amendments to ERAL.—The Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF INSPECTORS GEN- implement section 2(g) of the No Electronic U.S.C. App.) is amended— Theft (NET) Act (28 U.S.C. 994 note) in ac- ERAL CRIMINAL INVESTIGATOR ACADEMY AND INSPECTORS GEN- (1) in section 8G(a)(2) by striking ‘‘the Ten- cordance with the procedures set forth in ERAL FORENSIC LABORATORY. nessee Valley Authority,’’; and section 21(a) of the Sentencing Act of 1987, as (a) INSPECTORS GENERAL CRIMINAL INVESTI- (2) in section 11— though the authority under that Act had not GATOR ACADEMY.— (A) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘or the expired. (1) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established the Commissioner of Social Security, Social Se- The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without Criminal Investigator Academy within the De- curity Administration;’’ and inserting ‘‘the objection, it is so ordered. partment of the Treasury. The Criminal Investi- Commissioner of Social Security, Social Se- curity Administration; or the Board of Di- f gator Academy is established for the purpose of performing investigator training services for of- rectors of the Tennessee Valley Authority;’’; AMENDING THE INSPECTOR fices of inspectors general created under the In- and GENERAL ACT spector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.). (B) in paragraph (2) by striking ‘‘or the So- (2) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR.—The Criminal In- cial Security Administration;’’ and inserting Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I ask vestigator Academy shall be administered by an ‘‘the Social Security Administration, or the unanimous consent that the Senate Executive Director who shall report to an in- Tennessee Valley Authority;’’. now proceed to the consideration of spector general for an establishment as defined (c) EXECUTIVE SCHEDULE POSITION.—Sec- Calendar No. 408, S. 1707. in section 11 of the Inspector General Act of 1978 tion 5315 of title 5, United States Code, is The PRESIDING OFFICER. The (5 U.S.C. App.)— amended by inserting after the item relating clerk will report the bill by title. (A) designated by the President’s Council on to the Inspector General of the Small Busi- ness Administration the following: The legislative clerk read as follows: Integrity and Efficiency; or (B) if that council is eliminated, by a majority ‘‘Inspector General, Tennessee Valley Au- A bill (S. 1707) to amend the Inspector Gen- vote of the inspector generals created under the thority.’’. eral Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. app,.) to provide Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.). (d) EFFECTIVE DATE AND APPLICATION.— that certain designated Federal entities (b) INSPECTORS GENERAL FORENSIC LABORA- (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by shall be establishments under such Act, and TORY.— this section shall take effect 30 days after for other purposes. (1) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established the the date of enactment of this Act. There being no objection, the Senate Inspectors General Forensic Laboratory within (2) INSPECTOR GENERAL.—The person serv- proceeded to consider the bill which the Department of the Treasury. The Inspector ing as Inspector General of the Tennessee had been reported from the Committee General Forensic Laboratory is established for Valley Authority on the effective date of the purpose of performing forensic services for this section— on Governmental Affairs, with an offices of inspectors general created under the (A) may continue such service until the amendment to strike all after the en- Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.). President makes an appointment under sec- acting clause and inserting in lieu (2) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR.—The Inspectors tion 3(a) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 thereof the following: General Forensic Laboratory shall be adminis- (5 U.S.C. App.) consistent with the amend- SECTION 1. THE TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY tered by an Executive Director who shall report ments made by this section; and AS AN ESTABLISHMENT UNDER THE to an inspector general for an establishment as (B) shall be subject to section 8G (c) and (d) INSPECTOR GENERAL ACT OF 1978. defined in section 11 of the Inspector General of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds that— Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.)— App.) as applicable to the Board of Directors (1) Inspectors General serve an important (A) designated by the President’s Council on of the Tennessee Valley Authority, unless function in preventing and eliminating fraud, Integrity and Efficiency; or that person is appointed by the President, by
VerDate 29-OCT-99 06:08 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.021 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S14893 and with the advice and consent of the Sen- fined in section 11 of the Inspector General lishment as defined in section 11 of the In- ate, to be Inspector General of the Tennessee Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.)— spector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.)— Valley Authority. (A) designated by the President’s Council (A) designated by the President’s Council on Integrity and Efficiency; or on Integrity and Efficiency; or SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF INSPECTORS GEN- (B) if that council is eliminated, by a ma- (B) if that council is eliminated, by a ma- ERAL CRIMINAL INVESTIGATOR ACADEMY AND INSPECTORS GEN- jority vote of the inspector generals created jority vote of the inspector generals created ERAL FORENSIC LABORATORY. under the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 under the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.). U.S.C. App.). (a) INSPECTORS GENERAL CRIMINAL INVESTI- (b) INSPECTORS GENERAL FORENSIC LABORA- (c) SEPARATE APPROPRIATIONS ACCOUNT.— GATOR ACADEMY.— TORY.— Section 1105(a) of title 31, United States (1) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established (1) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established the Criminal Investigator Academy within the Inspectors General Forensic Laboratory Code, is amended by adding at the end the the Department of the Treasury. The Crimi- within the Department of the Treasury. The following: nal Investigator Academy is established for Inspector General Forensic Laboratory is es- ‘‘(33) a separate appropriation account for the purpose of performing investigator train- tablished for the purpose of performing fo- appropriations for the Inspectors General ing services for offices of inspectors general rensic services for offices of inspectors gen- Criminal Investigator Academy and the In- created under the Inspector General Act of eral created under the Inspector General Act spectors General Forensic Laboratory of the 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.). of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.). Department of the Treasury.’’. (2) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR.—The Criminal In- (2) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR.—The Inspectors (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— vestigator Academy shall be administered by General Forensic Laboratory shall be admin- There are authorized to carry out this sec- an Executive Director who shall report to an istered by an Executive Director who shall tion such sums as may be necessary for fiscal inspector general for an establishment as de- report to an inspector general for an estab- year 2001 and each fiscal year thereafter.
N O T I C E Senate proceedings for today are incomplete. Today’s Senate proceedings will be continued in the next issue of the Record.
VerDate 29-OCT-99 06:08 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 8633 E:\CR\FM\A19NO6.103 pfrm01 PsN: S19PT1 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks E2457 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS
REFORM OF THE COMMUNICA- to understand that you won't be around long only 32 students nationwide to earn the much TIONS SATELLITE COMPETITION in this business if you're only resting on your coveted scholarship named in honor of philan- AND PRIVATIZATION ACT laurels. thropist Cecil Rhodes. And just last year Mr. Speaker, I believe we can make this Manuel also earned the distinguished Truman HON. W.J. (BILLY) TAUZIN market even better for consumers. As the con- Scholarship. I want to recognize Manuel for OF LOUISIANA ference committee moves forward, we need to bringing honor to his family, his community IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ensure that legislation intending to direct the and to New Mexico. future of the satellite industry is consistent with Manuel was born and raised in Rainsville, in Thursday, November 18, 1999 current economics, and that it recognizes the the County of Mora. He lost his father at an Mr. TAUZIN. Mr. Speaker, when I last ad- enormous strides toward full, free and private early age. Through his faith and his gifts, he dressed the House concerning H.R. 3261, at competition that are already underway. We has turned tragedy into inspiration and misfor- Chairman BLILEY's request, I read his state- need to ensure that a wide range of issues tune into strength, both for himself and for ment into the CONGRESSIONAL RECORD. Due to are addressed in a manner that fosters even those around him. The County of Mora is one my long legislative history in issues relating to more competition, and that Congress enacts of the most economically disadvantaged coun- the satellite industry, I believe it is necessary balanced legislation which offers all compa- ties in our country. The county confronts all of for me to provide some additional views as the nies in the satellite services industry a level the challenges that affect rural America today. House and Senate prepare to begin a con- playing field. Although stricken by poverty, Mora is one of ference aimed at reconciling differences be- I want to specifically commend Chairman the wealthiest counties in spirit in our country, tween their respective bills. BLILEY for working to improve upon H.R. 1872 rich in culture and history with its Hispanic The Communications Satellite Competition in several important areas. I am particularly Heritage, rich in beauty with its mountains, and Privatization Act of 1999 is an important gratified that the House legislation has effec- valleys and rivers, rich in people that place the step forward in Congress' efforts to update the tively ensured that private contracts negotiated highest value on family, honor and respect. Communications Satellite Act of 1962 (1962 between entities are safeguarded and not sub- And Mora is rich in faith and rich in hope. The Act). I wish to acknowledge the efforts of ject to manipulation as a result of new legisla- best of Mora is personified in Manuel Montoya Chairman BLILEY in reaching out to members tion. and he has made our State and his commu- of the Telecommunications Subcommittee to We also need to be sensitive to the fact that nity very proud. address important issues and advance the this bill is necessary to accommodate a com- On behalf of all New Mexicans I want him legislative process. mercial transaction between two companies to know that he is in our thoughts and we look Mr. Speaker, reform of the 1962 Act is vi- that have already received regulatory approval forward to his many successes. Manuel, La tally necessary, as technological innovation for their merger. In this regard we should work Gente de Mora y de Nuevo Mexico estan and marketplace competition has dramatically to ensure that any action of the Congress Contigo. changed the satellite industry over the past 30 should not diminish the value of current invest- Thank you Mr. Speaker, I ask that a copy of years. Indeed, the arrival and rapid advance of ments or ongoing business activities. the newspaper article recognizing Manuel's undersea and underground fiber-optic cable We should also ensure that no single com- accomplishments also be placed in the systems has forced the industry to move be- petitor in the satellite services industry is ad- RECORD. yond what many policymakers have thought to vantaged or disadvantaged by our actions. In [From the Santa Fe New Mexican, Dec. 8, be its only role: universally providing tele- our effort to create a more dynamic market- 1999] communications services to broad audiences. place, we should endeavor ourselves to pro- MORA NATIVE WINS RHODES SCHOLARSHIP While the industry will certainly continue to vide even more consumer choice. Any limita- (By Kim Baca) lead efforts to develop new markets, satellites tion on services that any one company would As a boy, Manuel-Julian Rudolfo Montoya are now highly sought after to provide the ca- offer should be seen as an outcome that re- of Mora wrote stories about his father—his pacity and redundancy necessary to continue duces consumer choice. As I said previously, favorite hero next to Batman. the explosion in telecommunications usage, In his stories, his father helped him and at a time when demand for Internet and other the family. Montoya was 7 when his father data transmission, and e-commerce. In other broadband services are driving growth across died, but the child never forgot the things words, we have now learned that not only are the telecommunications industry, it would be his father taught him—especially things cable systems unable and, in some cases, un- terribly ironic if an action of the Congress ac- about trust, honor and leadership. willing to reach everyone, they may not be tually limited choice in the satellite market. It may be those things that helped the 21- able to service everyone. I am optimistic that we will produce legisla- year-old University of New Mexico senior be- As the landscape of the marketplace con- tion in the conference committee that is genu- come one of 32 American students named a tinues to change more cable and satellite sys- inely pro-competitive and offers customers Rhodes scholar Saturday. ‘‘I am not proud of the accomplishment, tems find themselves in direct competition for around the world more choices. I look forward but what it means to all those people that customers, and we have been forced to recon- to working with Chairman BLILEY and Senator helped me get there,’’ Montoya said. ‘‘This is sider our assumptions regarding the average BURNS to produce legislation that meets these by no means my scholarship; it belongs to a satellite services user. No longer are these objectives. lot of people—to my family, to my friends, users simply interested in access to services; f my community. It belongs to UNM and ev- satellite customers want exactly what other erybody has the right to celebrate that.’’ telecommunications customers want. They TRIBUTE TO MANUEL MONTOYA The prestigious scholarship program was want choice in the marketplace. They want the created in 1902 by British philanthropist and colonial pioneer Cecil J. Rhodes to help stu- option of different transmission systems. They HON. TOM UDALL dents from English colonies and the United want broadband services over the Internet. OF NEW MEXICO States attend Oxford University in England They want high quality and highly dependable IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES for two or three years. services. And they want it now. The scholarship, which pays all college and This change in consumer demand, coupled Thursday, November 18, 1999 university fees, is one of the oldest inter- with the exponential increase in Internet Mr. UDALL of New Mexico. Mr. Speaker, it national study awards available to students. usage, interactive data and direct-to-home sat- makes me very proud to rise before the House Montoya, a 1995 Mora High School grad- uate, has a long list of achievements. After ellite services fuels much of the growth in the of Representatives to recognize Manuel Mon- graduating as valedictorian, he was awarded satellite services industry today. The result is toya from Mora, NM. Just a few weeks ago the Regents Scholarship, a four-year grant a dynamic and highly competitive marketplace. Manuel began his studies at Oxford, England given to New Mexico’s highest achievers. How competitive? One need look no further as a Rhodes Scholar. Manuel is a graduate of While in college, the English and economics than the chapter 11 filings of Iridium and ICO the University of New Mexico and is one of double major helped establish a rural honors
∑ This ‘‘bullet’’ symbol identifies statements or insertions which are not spoken by a Member of the Senate on the floor. Matter set in this typeface indicates words inserted or appended, rather than spoken, by a Member of the House on the floor.
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
Canada-20th District price Mexico-20th District price Canadian 20th District differential differential Prescription drug and dosage form price Mexican price price Percent Dollar Percent Dollar
Zocor: 5 mg, 60 tab ...... $46.17 $67.65 $113.94 147 $67.77 68 $46.29 Prilosec: 20 mg, 30 cap ...... 55.10 32.10 129.49 135 74.39 303 97.39 Procardia XL: 30 mg, 100 tab ...... 74.25 76.60 142.17 91 67.92 86 65.57 Zoloft: 50 mg, 100 tab ...... 129.05 219.35 238.69 85 109.64 9 19.34 Norvasc: 5 mg, 90 tab ...... 89.91 99.32 127.77 42 37.86 29 28.45 Average differential ...... 100 99
These price differences can have substan- as much for their prescription drugs than are scriptions annually. They also frequently tial impacts on the cost of a prescription. consumers in other countries. Taken to- have inadequate insurance coverage or no in- Prilosec, and ulcer medication manufactured gether, the two studies indicate that drug surance coverage at all to pay for these by Merck, was the top prescription drug in manufacturers engage in a consistent pat- drugs. Approximately 75% of Medicare bene- dollar sales in the United States in 1998. An tern of price discrimination, resulting in ficiaries lack dependable, private-sector pre- uninsured senior citizen in Rep. Gonzalez’s prices for senior citizens and other con- scription drug coverage, and 35%—over 13 district must pay over $70 more than a con- sumers who buy their own drugs that far ex- million seniors—do not have any insurance sumer in Canada and nearly $100 more than ceed those paid by other purchasers in the coverage for prescription drugs. As a result, a consumer in Mexico for a one month sup- United States and other countries. many seniors cannot afford the high costs of ply of this drug. The total difference between I. INTRODUCTION prescription drugs. One study estimated that the price a senior in Rep. Gonzalez’s district more than one in eight seniors were forced to would pay for a year’s supply of Prilosec In the United States, drug manufacturers choose between buying food or paying for compared to a similar consumer in Mexico is are allowed to discriminate in drug pricing. prescription drugs. over $1,000. The difference between the price As the Congressional Budget Office reported In part to protect their citizens from these a senior in Rep. Gonzalez’s district would in a 1998 study, ‘‘[d]ifferent buyers pay dif- hardships, the governments of Canada and pay for a year’s supply of Prilosec compared ferent prices for brand-name prescription Mexico do not allow drug manufacturers to to a similar consumer in Canada is nearly drugs. . . . In today’s market for outpatient engage in price discrimination. In Canada, $900. prescription drugs, purchasers that have no approximately 35% of prescription drugs are In the case of two additional drugs consid- insurance coverage for drugs, pay the high- paid for by the government for beneficiaries ered in the study, Synthroid and Micronase, est prices for brand name drugs.’’ In 1999, the of government health care programs. In Mex- senior citizens in Rep. Gonzalez’s district Federal Trade Commission reached the same ico, 30% of prescription drugs are paid for by were forced to pay more than two times, and conclusion, reporting that drug manufactur- the government under similar cir- in one case over five times, the prices ers use a ‘‘two tiered pricing structure’’ cumstances. The rest of the population in charged to Canadian or Mexican consumers. under which they ‘‘charge higher prices to these two countries must either buy their This is the second congressional report on the uninsured.’’ own drugs or obtain prescription drug insur- drug price discrimination requested by Rep. This discriminatory pricing imposes severe ance coverage. To prevent drug companies Gonzalez. the first report showed that senior hardships on senior citizens. As documented from charging individual consumers exces- citizens in Texas’s 20th Congressional Dis- in the previous report released by Rep. Gon- sive prices, both the Canadian and Mexican trict are forced to pay over twice as much zalez, senior citizens often have the greatest governments regulate prices for patented for their prescription drugs as the drug com- need for prescription drugs, but the least prescription drugs. Drug manufacturers do panies’ favored domestic customers, such as ability to pay for them. The elderly in the not have to sell their products in Canada or HMOs and the federal government. This re- United States, who make up 12% of the popu- Mexico, but if they do, they cannot sell their port shows that senior citizens in Rep. Gon- lation, use one-third of all prescription drugs at prices above the maximum prices zalez’s district are also forced to pay twice drugs, with the average senior using 18.5 pre- established by the government.
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
VerDate 29
HIGHLIGHTS Senate agreed to Consolidated Appropriations Conference Report. First Session of the 106th Congress adjourned sine die. Senate operability and portability applicable to electronic Chamber Action food stamp benefit transactions, and the bill was Routine Proceedings, pages S14839–S14893 then passed, after agreeing to the following amend- Measures Introduced: Twenty-eight bills and nine ment proposed thereto: Pages S14877±78 resolutions were introduced, as follows: S. Collins (for Fitzgerald) Amendment No. 2785, in 1971–1998, S. Res. 234–241, and S. Con. Res. 77. the nature of a substitute. Pages S14877±78 (See next issue.) Enrollment Correction: Senate agreed to S. Con. Measures Reported: Reports were made as follows: Res. 77, making technical corrections to the enroll- S. 795, to amend the Fastener Quality Act to ment of H.R. 3194. Page S14878 strengthen the protection against the sale of Federal Reports Elimination and Sunset Act of mismarked, misrepresented, and counterfeit fasteners 1995 Exemptions: Committee on Governmental Af- and eliminate unnecessary requirements, with fairs was discharged from further consideration of amendments. (S. Rept. No. 106–224) H.R. 3111, to exempt certain reports from auto- (See next issue.) matic elimination and sunset pursuant to the Federal Measures Passed: Reports Elimination and Sunset Act of 1995, and Internet Gambling Prohibition Act: Senate the bill was then passed, after agreeing to the fol- passed S. 692, to prohibit Internet gambling, after lowing amendment proposed thereto: Pages S14878±81 agreeing to a committee amendment in the nature Collins (for Leahy) Amendment No. 2786, to pro- of a substitute, and the following amendments pro- vide continued reporting of intercepted wire, oral, posed thereto: Pages S14863±70 and electronic communications. Pages S14878±81 Collins (for Kyl/Bryan) Amendment No. 2782, in Millennium Digital Commerce Act: Senate the nature of a substitute. Pages S14865±70 passed S. 761, to regulate interstate commerce by Collins (for Campbell) Amendment No. 2783 (to electronic means by permitting and encouraging the Amendment No. 2782), to provide for Indian gam- continued expansion of electronic commerce through ing provisions. Pages S14865±70 the operation of free market forces, after agreeing to Date-Rape Drug Control Act: Senate passed H.R. a committee amendment in the nature of a sub- 2130, to amend the Controlled Substances Act to stitute, and the following amendment proposed add gamma hydroxybutyric acid and ketamine to the thereto: Pages S14881±89 schedules of control substances, to provide for a na- Collins (for Abraham) Amendment No. 2787, in tional awareness campaign, after striking all after the the nature of a substitute. Page S14882 enacting clause and inserting in lieu thereof the text Church Plan Parity and Entanglement Preven- of S. 1561, Senate companion measure, after agreeing tion Act: Committee on Health, Education, Labor, to committee amendments, and the following and Pensions was discharged from further consider- amendment proposed thereto: Pages S14870±77 ation of S. 1309, to amend title I of the Employee Collins (for Hutchison) Amendment No. 2784, to Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to provide modify the short title Page S14872 for the preemption of State law in certain cases relat- Subsequently, S. 1561 was placed back on the ing to certain church plans, and the bill was then Senate calendar. Page S14872 passed, after agreeing to the following amendment Electronic Benefit Transfer Interoperability and proposed thereto: Pages S14889±91 Portability Act: Committee on Agriculture, Nutri- Collins (for Sessions/Jeffords) Amendment No. tion, and Forestry was discharged from further con- 2788, in the nature of a substitute. Page S14889 sideration of S. 1733, to amend the Food Stamp Act Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act of 1977 to provide for a national standard of inter- Amendments: Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, D1321
VerDate 29-OCT-99 07:22 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5627 Sfmt 5627 E:\CR\FM\D19NO9.REC pfrm04 PsN: D19NO9 D1322 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — DAILY DIGEST November 19, 1999 and Forestry was discharged from further consider- Taiwan in the World Health Organization: Sen- ation of S. 961, to amend the Consolidated Farm ate passed H.R. 1794, concerning the participation And Rural Development Act to improve shared ap- of Taiwan in the World Health Organization preciation arrangements, and the bill was then (WHO), clearing the measure for the President. passed, after agreeing to the following amendment (See next issue.) proposed thereto: Page S14891 Sudan Peace Act: Senate passed S. 1453, to facili- Collins (for Burns) Amendment No. 2789, in the tate famine relief efforts and a comprehensive solu- nature of a substitute. Page S14891 tion to the war in Sudan, after agreeing to a com- Inspector General Act Amendments: Senate mittee amendment in the nature of a substitute. passed S. 1707, to amend the Inspector General Act (See next issue.) of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) to provide that certain des- Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Res- ignated Federal entities shall be establishments toration Act: Senate passed S. 1119, to amend the under such Act, after agreeing to a committee Act of August 9, 1950, to continue funding of the amendment in the nature of a substitute. Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restora- Pages S14892±93 tion Act. (See next issue.) Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Equitable Com- State Flexibility Clarification Act: Senate passed pensation Act: Senate passed S. 964, to provide for H.R. 3257, to amend the Congressional Budget Act equitable compensation for the Cheyenne River of 1974 to assist the Congressional Budget Office Sioux Tribe, after agreeing to a committee amend- with the scoring of State and local mandates, clear- ment in the nature of a substitute. (See next issue.) ing the measure for the President. (See next issue.) Indian Tribal Justice Technical and Legal As- Radiation Exposure Compensation Act Amend- sistance Act of 1999: Senate passed S. 1508, to pro- ments: Senate passed S. 1515, to amend the Radi- vide technical and legal assistance for tribal justice ation Exposure Compensation Act, after agreeing to systems and members of Indian tribes, after agreeing a committee amendment. (See next issue.) to a committee amendment in the nature of a sub- Private Relief: Senate passed S. 302, for the relief stitute. (See next issue.) of Kerantha Poole-Christian. (See next issue.) Federal Emergency Management Food and Shel- Private Relief: Senate passed S. 1019, for the re- ter Program Reauthorization: Senate passed S. lief of Regine Beatie Edwards. (See next issue.) 1516, to amend title III of the Stewart B. McKinney Private Relief: Senate passed S. 276, for the relief Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11331 et seq.) of Sergio Lozano, after agreeing to a committee to reauthorize the Federal Emergency Management amendment in the nature of a substitute. Food and Shelter Program. (See next issue.) (See next issue.) Federal Report Elimination and Sunset Act Secretary of the Treasury/Republic of Iceland Amendments of 1999: Senate passed S. 1877, to Minting of Coins: Senate passed H.R. 3373, to re- amend the Federal Report Elimination and Sunset quire the Secretary of the Treasury to mint coins in Act of 1995. (See next issue.) conjunction with the minting of coins by the Re- Office of Government Ethics Authorization Act public of Iceland in commemoration of the millen- of 1999: Senate passed S. 1503, to amend the Ethics nium of the discovery of the New World by Lief Er- in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) to ex- icson, clearing the measure for the President. tend the authorization of appropriations for the Of- (See next issue.) fice of Government Ethics through fiscal year 2003. Export Enhancement Act: Senate passed H.R. (See next issue.) 3381, to reauthorize the Overseas Private Investment U.S. Holocaust Assets Commission Extension Corporation and the Trade and Development Agen- Act: Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban cy, clearing the measure for the President. Affairs was discharged from further consideration of (See next issue.) H.R. 2401, to amend the U.S. Holocaust Assets Secretariat of the Free Trade Area of the Amer- Commission Act of 1998 to extend the period by icas Location: Committee on Finance was discharged which the final report is due and to authorize addi- from further consideration of S. Con. Res. 71, ex- tional funding, and the bill was then passed, clearing pressing the sense of Congress that Miami, Florida, the measure for the President. (See next issue.) and not a competing foreign city, should serve as the Federal Reserve Act: Committee on Banking, permanent location for the Secretariat of the Free Housing, and Urban Affairs, was discharged from Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) beginning in further consideration of H.R. 1094, to amend the 2005, and the resolution was then agreed to. Federal Reserve Act to broaden the range of discount (See next issue.) window loans which may be used as collateral for Condemning Violence in Chechnya: Committee Federal reserve notes, and the bill was then passed, on Foreign Relations was discharged from further clearing the measure for the President. consideration of S. Res. 223, condemning the vio- (See next issue.) lence in Chechnya, and the resolution was then
VerDate 29-OCT-99 07:22 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5627 Sfmt 5627 E:\CR\FM\D19NO9.REC pfrm04 PsN: D19NO9 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — DAILY DIGEST D1323 agreed to, after agreeing to the following amend- United States Navy on the 100th anniversary of the ment proposed thereto: (See next issue.) force, and the resolution was then agreed to. Collins (for Helms) Amendment No. 2791, to (See next issue.) make clerical corrections. (See next issue.) Printing Authority: Senate agreed to S. Res. 235, Human Rights in China: Senate agreed to S. to authorize the printing of a revised edition of the Res. 217, relating to the freedom of belief, expres- Senate Election Law Guidebook. (See next issue.) sion, and association in the People’s Republic of Printing Authority: Senate agreed to S. Res. 236, China. (See next issue.) to authorize the printing of a revised edition of the U.S. Border Patrol’s 75 Years of Service: Senate Nomination and Election of the President and Vice agreed to H. Con. Res. 122, recognizing the United President of the United States. (See next issue.) States Border Patrol’s 75 years of service since its Printing Authority: Senate agreed to H. Con. founding. (See next issue.) Res. 221, authorizing printing of the brochures enti- Celebrating One America: Senate agreed to H. tled ‘‘How Our Laws Are Made’’ and ‘‘Our American Con. Res. 141, celebrating One America. Government’’, the pocket version of the United (See next issue.) States Constitution, and the document-sized, anno- tated version of the United States Constitution, after Commending WWII Veterans: Senate passed H.J. agreeing to the following amendment proposed Res. 65, commending the World War II veterans thereto: Page who fought in the Battle of the Bulge, clearing the Collins (for McConnell/Robb) Amendment No. measure for the President. (See next issue.) 2793, in the nature of a substitute. (See next issue.) National Family Week: Senate agreed to S. Res. 204, designating the week beginning November 21, Commemorative Postage Stamp/4-H Youth De- 1999, and the week beginning on November 19, velopment Program: Committee on Governmental Affairs was discharged from further consideration of 2000, as ‘National Family Week.’ (See next issue.) S. Res. 218, expressing the sense of the Senate that National Biotechnology Month: Senate agreed to a commemorative postage stamp should be issued S. Res. 200, designating January 2000 as ‘‘National recognizing the 4-H Youth Development Program’s Biotechnology Month,’’ after agreeing to committee centennial, and the resolution was then agreed to. amendments, and the following amendment pro- (See next issue.) posed thereto: (See next issue.) Commemorative Postage Stamp/Purple Heart Collins (for Grams) Amendment No. 2792, pro- Recipients: Committee on Governmental Affairs was viding for a title amendment. (See next issue.) discharged from further consideration of S. Con. Res. National Children’s Memorial Day: Senate 42, expressing the sense of the Congress that a com- agreed to S. Res. 118, designating December 12, memorative postage stamp should be issued by the 1999, as ‘‘National Children’s Memorial Day’’. United States Postal Service honoring the members (See next issue.) of the Armed Forces who have been awarded the Give Thanks, Give Life: Committee on the Judi- Purple Heart, and the resolution was then agreed to. ciary was discharged from further consideration of S. (See next issue.) Res. 225, to designate November 23, 2000, Thanks- Lance Corporal Harold Gomez Post Office: Sen- giving Day, as a day to ‘‘Give Thanks, Give Life’’ ate passed S. 1295, to designate the United States and to discuss organ and tissue donation with other Post Office located at 3813 Main Street in East Chi- family members, and the resolution was then agreed cago, Indiana, as the ‘‘Lance Corporal Harold Gomez to. (See next issue.) Post Office’’. (See next issue.) Recognizing the Contributions of Older Persons: Postal Service Building Designations: Senate Senate agreed to S. Res. 234, recognizing the con- passed H.R. 100, to establish designations for tribution of older persons to their communities and United States Postal Service buildings in Philadel- commending the work of organizations that partici- phia, Pennsylvania, clearing the measure for the pate in programs assisting older persons and that President. (See next issue.) promote the goals of the International Year of Older Clifford R. Hope Post Office: Senate passed H.R. Persons. 197, to designate the facility of the United States Honoring Air National Guard’s 109th Airlift Postal Service at 410 North 6th Street in Garden Wing: Senate agreed to H. Con. Res. 205, recog- City, Kansas, as the ‘‘Clifford R. Hope Post Office’’, nizing and honoring the heroic efforts of the Air Na- clearing the measure for the President. tional Guard’s 109th Airlift Wing and its rescue of (See next issue.) Dr. Jerri Nielsen from the South Pole. Postal Service Facility Designations: Senate (See next issue.) passed H.R. 1191, to designate certain facilities of Commending U.S. Navy: Committee on Armed the United States Postal Service in Chicago, Illinois, Services was discharged from further consideration of clearing the measure for the President. S. Res. 196, commending the submarine force of the (See next issue.)
VerDate 29-OCT-99 07:22 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5627 Sfmt 5627 E:\CR\FM\D19NO9.REC pfrm04 PsN: D19NO9 D1324 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — DAILY DIGEST November 19, 1999 Noal Cushing Baterman Post Office Building: Collins (for Hatch) Amendment No. 2796, to Senate passed H.R. 1251, to designate the United amend the designation date of ‘‘National Colorectal States Postal Service building located at 8850 South Cancer Awareness Month’’. (See next issue.) 700 East, Sandy, Utah, as the ‘‘Noal Cushing Bate- Enrollment Correction: Senate agreed to H. Con. man Post Office Building’’, clearing the measure for Res. 236, correcting the enrollment of H.R. 1180. the President. (See next issue.) (See next issue.) Maurine B. Neuberger U.S. Post Office: Senate El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro National passed H.R. 1327, to designate the United States Historic Trail Act: Senate passed S. 366, to amend Postal Service building located at 34480 Highway the National Trails System Act to designate El Ca- 101 South in Cloverdale, Oregon, as the ‘‘Maurine mino Real de Tierra Adentro as a National Historic B. Neuberger United States Post Office’’, clearing Trail, after agreeing to committee amendments. the measure for the President. (See next issue.) (See next issue.) John J. Buchanan Post Office Building: Senate Glacier Bay Fisheries Act: Senate passed S. 501, passed H.R. 1377, to designate the facility of the to address resource management issues in Glacier United States Postal Service located at 9308 South Bay National Park, Alaska, after agreeing to a com- Chicago Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, as the ‘‘John J. mittee amendment in the nature of a substitute, and Buchanan Post Office Building’’, after agreeing to a the following amendment proposed thereto: committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. (See next issue.) (See next issue.) Lott (for Bingaman) Amendment No. 2801, in Private Relief: Committee on the Judiciary was the nature of a substitute. (See next issue.) discharged from further consideration of H.R. 322, Lewis and Clark Rural Water System Act: Sen- for the relief of Suchada Kwong, and the bill was ate passed S. 244, to authorize the construction of then passed, clearing the measure for the President. the Lewis and Clark Rural Water System and to au- (See next issue.) thorize assistance to the Lewis and Clark Rural Senate Representation: Senate agreed to S. Res. Water System, Inc., a nonprofit corporation, for the 238, to authorize representation of Member of the planning and construction of the water supply sys- Senate in the case of Brett Kimberlin v. Orrin tem, after agreeing to a committee amendment in Hatch, et al. (See next issue.) the nature of a substitute. (See next issue.) DEFEAT Meth Act: Senate passed S. 486, to pro- Gateway Visitor Center Authorization Act: Sen- vide for the punishment of methoamphetamine lab- ate passed H.R. 449, to authorize the Gateway Vis- oratory operators, provide additional resources to itor Center at Independence National Historical combat methamphetamine production, trafficking, Park, clearing the measure for the President. and abuse in the United States, after agreeing to a (See next issue.) committee amendment in the nature of a substitute, Mt. Hope Waterpower Project: Senate passed H. and the following amendment proposed thereto: R. 459, to extend the deadline under the Federal (See next issue.) Power Act for FERC Project No. 9401, the Mt. Collins (for Hatch) Amendment No. 2794, in the Hope Waterpower Project, clearing the measure for nature of a substitute. (See next issue.) the President. (See next issue.) Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial Commission Act: Star-Spangled Banner National Historic Trail Committee on the Judiciary was discharged from Study Act: Senate passed H.R. 791, to amend the further consideration of H.R. 1451, to establish the National Trails System Act to designate the route of Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial Commission, and the the War of 1812 British invasion of Maryland and bill was then passed, after agreeing to the following Washington, District of Columbia, and the route of amendment proposed thereto: (See next issue.) the American defense, for study for potential addi- Collins (for Hatch) Amendment No. 2795, in the tion to the national trails system, clearing the meas- nature of a substitute. (See next issue.) ure for the President. (See next issue.) Child Abuse Prevention and Enforcement Act: Otay Mountain Wilderness Act: Senate passed H. Senate passed H.R. 764, to reduce the incidence of R. 15, to designate a portion of the Otay Mountain child abuse and neglect, after agreeing to a com- region of California as wilderness, clearing the meas- mittee amendment in the nature of a substitute. ure for the President. (See next issue.) (See next issue.) Arizona Statehood and Enabling Act Amend- National Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month: ments: Senate passed H. R. 747, to protect the per- Committee on the Judiciary was discharged from manent trust funds of the State of Arizona from ero- further consideration of S. Res. 108, designating the sion due to inflation and modify the basis on which month of March 2000, as ‘‘National Colorectal Can- distributions are made from those funds, clearing the cer Awareness Month’’, and the resolution was then measure for the President. (See next issue.) agreed to, after agreeing to the following amend- Home of Franklin D. Roosevelt National His- ment proposed thereto: (See next issue.) toric Site: Senate passed H.R. 1104, to authorize the
VerDate 29-OCT-99 07:22 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 5627 Sfmt 5627 E:\CR\FM\D19NO9.REC pfrm04 PsN: D19NO9 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — DAILY DIGEST D1325 Secretary of the Interior to transfer administrative ju- lands in the State of South Dakota, and the bill was risdiction over land within the boundaries of the then passed, clearing the measure for the President. Home of Franklin D. Roosevelt National Historic (See next issue.) Site to the Archivist of the United States for the Central Utah Project Completion Act Amend- construction of a visitor center, clearing the measure ment: Senate passed H.R. 2889, to amend the Cen- for the President. (See next issue.) tral Utah Project Completion Act to provide for ac- Thomas Cole National Historic Site Act: Senate quisition of water and water rights for Central Utah passed H.R. 658, to establish the Thomas Cole Na- Project purposes, completion of Central Utah project tional Historic Site in the State of New York as an facilities, and implementation of water conservation affiliated area of the National Park System, clearing measures, clearing the measure for the President. the measure for the President. (See next issue.) (See next issue.) Virginia Wilderness Battlefield: Senate passed National Park Entertainment Fee Collection: H.R. 1665, to allow the National Park Service to ac- Senate passed H.R. 154, to allow the Secretary of the quire certain land for addition to the Wilderness Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture to establish Battlefield in Virginia, as previously authorized by a fee system for commercial filming activities on law, by purchase or exchange as well as by donation, Federal land, after agreeing to a committee amend- clearing the measure for the President. ment in the nature of a substitute. (See next issue.) (See next issue.) Alaska Rescue Cost Recovery: Senate passed S. Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area: 698, to review the suitability and feasibility of re- Senate passed H.R. 2140, to improve protection and covering costs of high altitude rescues at Denali Na- management of the Chattahoochee River National tional Park and Preserve in the State of Alaska. Recreation Area in the State of Georgia, clearing the (See next issue.) measure for the President. (See next issue.) Alaska Native Hiring Improvement: Senate Perkins County Rural Water System Act: Senate passed S. 748, to improve Native hiring and con- passed H.R. 970, to authorize the Secretary of the tracting by the Federal Government within the State Interior to provide assistance to the Perkins County of Alaska, after agreeing to committee amendments. Rural Water System, Inc., for the construction of (See next issue.) water supply facilities in Perkins County, South Da- National Discovery Trails Act: Senate passed S. kota, clearing the measure for the President. 734, entitled the ‘‘National Discovery Trails Act of National Geologic Mapping Reauthorization 1999’’, after agreeing to committee amendments. Act: Senate passed H.R. 1528, to reauthorize and (See next issue.) amend the National Geologic Mapping Act of 1992, National Oilheat Research Alliance Act: Senate clearing the measure for the President. passed S. 348, to authorize and facilitate a program (See next issue.) to enhance training, research and development, en- Upper Delaware Scenic and Recreational River ergy conservation and efficiency, and consumer edu- Mongaup Visitor Center Act: Senate passed H.R. cation in the oilheat industry for the benefit of 20, to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to con- oilheat consumers and the public, after agreeing to struct and operate a visitor center for the Upper committee amendments, and the following amend- Delaware Scenic and Recreational River on land ment proposed thereto: (See next issue.) owned by the State of New York, after withdrawing Lott (for Murkowski) Amendment No. 2802, to the committee amendment, clearing the measure for provide for national oil heat research, small hydro- the President. (See next issue.) electric projects in Alaska, hydroelectric projects in World War Veterans Park: Senate passed H.R. Hawaii, and to extend the time for Federal Energy 592, to designate a portion of Gateway National Regulatory Commission project. (See next issue.) Recreation Area as ‘‘World War Veterans Park at Arizona National Forest Improvement Act: Sen- Miller Field’’, clearing the measure for the President. ate passed S. 1088, to authorize the Secretary of Ag- (See next issue.) riculture to convey certain administrative sites in na- Quinebaug and Shetucket Rivers Valley Na- tional forests in the State of Arizona, to convey cer- tional Heritage Corridor Reauthorization Act: Sen- tain land to the City of Sedona, Arizona for a waste- ate passed H.R. 1619, to amend the Quinebaug and water treatment facility, after agreeing to the fol- Shetucket Rivers Valley National Heritage Corridor lowing amendment proposed thereto: (See next issue.) Act of 1994 to expand the boundaries of the Cor- Lott (for Kyl) Amendment No. 2803, to reduce ridor, clearing the measure for the President. the amount of consideration to be paid by the City (See next issue.) by the amount of special use permit fees paid by the Terry Peak Land Transfer Act: Committee on City. (See next issue.) Energy and Natural Resources was discharged from Exxon Valdez Settlement Investment: Senate further consideration of H.R. 2079, to provide for passed S. 711, to allow for the investment of joint the conveyance of certain National Forest System Federal and State funds from the civil settlement of
VerDate 29-OCT-99 07:22 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 5627 Sfmt 5627 E:\CR\FM\D19NO9.REC pfrm04 PsN: D19NO9 D1326 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — DAILY DIGEST November 19, 1999 damages from the Exxon Valdez oil spill, after agree- Daschle (for Bingaman) Amendment No. 2805, to ing to a committee amendment in the nature of a authorize the appropriation of $5 million each year. substitute. (See next issue.) (See next issue.) Omnibus Parks Technical Corrections Act: Sen- Vicksburg Campaign Trail Battlefields Preser- ate passed H.R. 149, to make technical corrections vation Act: Senate passed S. 710, to authorize the to the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Manage- feasibility study on the preservation of certain Civil ment Act of 1996, after agreeing to committee War battlefields along the Vicksburg Campaign amendments, and the following amendment pro- Trail, after agreeing to committee amendments. posed thereto: (See next issue.) Lackawanna Valley American Heritage Area Lott (for Murkowski) Amendment No. 2804, to Act: Senate passed S. 905, to establish the Lacka- make further amendments. (See next issue.) wanna Valley National Heritage Area, after agreeing Nye County, Nevada Land Conveyance: Senate to committee amendments. (See next issue.) passed S. 1329, to direct the Secretary of the Interior Corinth Battlefield Preservation Act: Senate to convey certain land to Nye County, Nevada, after passed S. 1117, to establish the Corinth Unit of Shi- agreeing to a committee amendment. (See next issue.) loh National Military Park, in the vicinity of the Mesquite, Nevada Public Land Purchase: Senate city of Corinth, Mississippi, and in the State of Ten- passed S. 1330, to give the city of Mesquite, Ne- nessee, after agreeing to committee amendments. vada, the right to purchase at fair market value cer- (See next issue.) tain parcels of public land in the city. Gettysburg National Military Park Boundary (See next issue.) Expansion: Senate passed S. 1324, to expand the boundaries of the Gettysburg National Military Park Arrowrock Dam Hydroelectric Project: Senate to include Wills House. (See next issue.) passed S. 1236, to extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act for commencement of the con- Hoover Dam Miscellaneous Sales Act: Senate struction of the Arrowrock Dam Hydroelectric passed S. 1275, to authorize the Secretary of the In- terior to produce and sell products and to sell publi- Project in the State of Idaho. (See next issue.) cations relating to the Hoover Dam, and to deposit Dickinson Dam Bascule Gates Settlement Act: revenues generated from the sales into the Colorado Senate passed S. 769, to provide a final settlement River Dam fund. (See next issue.) on certain debt owed by the city of Dickinson, Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act: North Dakota, for the construction of the bascule Senate passed S. 624, to authorize construction of gates on the Dickinson Dam, after agreeing to a the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System in committee amendment. (See next issue.) the State of Montana, after agreeing to a committee Griffith Project Prepayment and Conveyance amendment in the nature of a substitute. Act: Senate passed S. 986, to direct the Secretary of (See next issue.) the Interior to convey the Griffith Project to the Methane Hydrate Research and Development Southern Nevada Water Authority, after agreeing to Act: Senate passed H.R. 1753, to promote the re- a committee amendment in the nature of a sub- search, identification, assessment, exploration, and stitute. (See next issue.) development of methane hydrate resources, after Wyoming Surface Estate Conveyance: Senate agreeing to the following amendment proposed passed S. 1030, to provide that the conveyance by thereto: (See next issue.) the Bureau of Land Management of the surface estate Daschle (for Akaka) Amendment No. 2806, in the to certain land in the State of Wyoming in exchange nature of a substitute. (See next issue.) for certain private land will not result in the removal Toiyabe National Forest Boundary Adjustment: of the land from operation of the mining laws, after Senate passed S. 439, to amend the National Forest agreeing to a committee amendment. (See next issue.) and Public Lands of Nevada Enhancement Act of Imperial Dam Salinity Control: Senate passed S. 1988 to adjust the boundary of the Toiyabe National 1211, to amend the Colorado River Basin Salinity Forest, Nevada. (See next issue.) Control Act to authorize additional measures to carry Miwaleta Park Expansion Act: Senate passed S. out the control of salinity upstream of Imperial Dam 977, to provide for the conveyance by the Bureau of in a cost-effective manner, after agreeing to a com- Land Management to Douglas County, Oregon, of a mittee amendment. (See next issue.) county park and certain adjacent land, after agreeing Community Forest Restoration Act: Senate to committee amendments. (See next issue.) passed S. 1288, to provide incentives for collabo- Lower Delaware Wild and Scenic Rivers Act: rative forest restoration projects on National Forest Senate passed S. 1296, to designate portions of the System and other public lands in New Mexico, after lower Delaware River and associated tributaries as a agreeing to a committee amendment in the nature component of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers of a substitute, and the following amendment pro- System, after agreeing to a committee amendment in posed thereto: (See next issue.) the nature of a substitute. (See next issue.)
VerDate 29-OCT-99 07:22 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 5627 Sfmt 5627 E:\CR\FM\D19NO9.REC pfrm04 PsN: D19NO9 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — DAILY DIGEST D1327 National Park System New Area Study Act: the Dugger Mountain Wilderness, clearing the meas- Senate passed S. 1349, to direct the Secretary of the ure for the President. (See next issue.) Interior to conduct special resource studies to deter- Foster Care Independence Act: Committee on Fi- mine the national significance of specific sites as well nance was discharged from further consideration of as the suitability and feasibility of their inclusion as H.R. 1802, to amend part E of title IV of the Social units of the National Park System, after agreeing to Security Act to provide States with more funding committee amendments. (See next issue.) and greater flexibility in carrying out programs de- Taunton River Wild and Scenic River Study signed to help children make the transition from fos- Act: Senate passed S. 1569, to amend the Wild and ter care to self sufficiency, and the bill was then Scenic Rivers Act to designate segments of the passed, after agreeing to the following amendment Taunton River in the Commonwealth of Massachu- proposed thereto: (See next issue.) setts for study for potential addition to the National Collins Amendment No. 2797, in the nature of a Wild and Scenic Rivers System, after agreeing to substitute. (See next issue.) committee amendments. (See next issue.) Black Hills National Forest Land Exchange: Convening of the 2nd Session/106th Congress: Senate passed S. 1599, to authorize the Secretary of Senate passed H.J. Res. 85, appointing the day for Agriculture to sell or exchange all or part of certain the convening of the second session of the One Hun- administrative sites and other land in the Black dred Sixth Congress, clearing the measure for the Hills National Forest and to use funds derived from President. (See next issue.) the sale or exchange to acquire replacement sites and Commending Keeper of the Stationery: Senate to acquire or construct administrative improvements agreed to S. Res. 240, commending Stephen G. Bale, in connection with Black Hills National Forest. Keeper of the Stationery, U.S. Senate. (See next issue.) (See next issue.) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration: Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail Land Senate passed H.R. 3419, to amend title 49, United Conveyance: Senate passed H.R. 2737, to authorize States Code, to establish the Federal Motor Carrier the Secretary of the Interior to convey to the State Safety Administration, clearing the measure for the of Illinois certain Federal land associated with the President. (See next issue.) Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail to be used Congressional Gold Medal: Committee on Bank- as an historic and interpretive site along the trail, ing, Housing, and Urban Affairs was discharged clearing the measure for the President. from further consideration of S. 1971, to authorize (See next issue.) the President to award a gold medal on behalf of the Jackson Multi-Agency Campus Act: Senate Congress to Milton Friedman, in recognition of his passed S. 1374, to authorize the development and outstanding and enduring contributions to indi- maintenance of a multi-agency campus project in the vidual freedom and opportunity in American society town of Jackson, Wyoming, after agreeing to a com- through his exhaustive research and teaching of eco- mittee amendment in the nature of a substitute. nomics, and his extensive writings on economics and (See next issue.) public policy, and the bill was then passed. Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act Amendments: Committee on En- Father Theodore M. Hesburgh Congressional ergy and Natural Resources was discharged from fur- Gold Medal Act: Senate passed H.R. 1932, to au- ther consideration of S. 1937, to amend the Pacific thorize the President to award a gold medal on be- Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation half of the Congress to Father Theodore M. Act to provide for sales of electricity by the Bonne- Hesburgh, in recognition of his outstanding and en- ville Power Administration to joint operating enti- during contributions to civil rights, higher edu- ties, and the bill was then passed. (See next issue.) cation, the Catholic Church, the Nation, and the global community, clearing the measure for the Keweenaw National Historical Parks Advisory President. (See next issue.) Commission Members Appointments: Committee on Energy and Natural Resources was discharged Vaccine Injury Compensation: Senate passed S. from further consideration of H.R. 748, to amend 1996, to amend the Public Health Service Act to the Act that established the Keweenaw National clarify provisions relating to the content of petitions Historical Park to require the Secretary of the Inte- for compensation under the vaccine injury compensa- rior to consider nominees of various local interests in tion program. (See next issue.) appointing members of the Keweenaw National His- Clinical Research Enhancement Act: Committee torical Parks Advisory Commission, and the bill was on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions was dis- then passed, clearing the measure for the President. charged from further consideration of S. 1813, to (See next issue.) amend the Public Health Service Act to provide ad- Dugger Mountain Wilderness Act: Senate passed ditional support for and to expand clinical research H.R. 2632, to designate certain Federal lands in the programs, and the bill was then passed. Talladega National Forest in the State of Alabama as (See next issue.)
VerDate 29-OCT-99 07:22 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 5627 Sfmt 5627 E:\CR\FM\D19NO9.REC pfrm04 PsN: D19NO9 D1328 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — DAILY DIGEST November 19, 1999 Fire Protection Overtime: Senate passed H.R. Digital Theft Deterrence and Copyright Dam- 1693, to amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of ages Improvement Act: Senate passed H.R. 3456, to 1938 to clarify the overtime exemption for employ- amend statutory damages provisions of title 17, ees engaged in fire protection activities, clearing the United States Code, clearing the measure for the measure for the President. (See next issue.) President. (See next issue.) Cardiac Arrest Survival Act: Committee on ‘‘Shoeless Joe’’ Jackson Baseball Accomplishment Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions was dis- Recognition: Committee on Commerce, Science, and charged from further consideration of S. 1488, to Transportation was discharged from further consider- amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for ation of S. Res. 134, expressing the sense of the Sen- recommendations of the Secretary of Health and ate that Joseph Jefferson ‘‘Shoeless Joe’’ Jackson Human Services regarding the placement of auto- should be appropriately honored for his outstanding matic external defibrillators in Federal buildings in baseball accomplishments, and the resolution was order to improve survival rates of individuals who then agreed to, after agreeing to the following experience cardiac arrest in such buildings, and to amendment proposed thereto: (See next issue.) establish protections from civil liability arising from Collins (for Thurmond) Amendment No. 2800, in the emergency use of the devices, and the bill was the nature of a substitute. (See next issue.) then passed, after agreeing to the following amend- Zachary Fisher Honorary Veteran Status Con- ment proposed thereto: (See next issue.) ferment: Senate passed H. J. Res. 46, conferring sta- Collins (for Gorton) Amendment No. 2798, in the tus as an honorary veteran of the United States nature of a substitute. (See next issue.) Armed Forces on Zachary Fisher, clearing the meas- Twenty-First Century Research Laboratories ure for the President. (See next issue.) Act: Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Directing the Senate Commission on Art: Senate Pensions was discharged from further consideration agreed to S. Res. 241, to direct the Senate Commis- of S. 1268, to amend the Public Health Service Act sion on Art to recommend to the Senate 2 out- to provide support for the modernization and con- standing individuals whose paintings shall be placed struction of biomedical and behavioral research facili- in 2 of the remaining unfilled spaces in the Senate ties and laboratory instrumentation, and the bill was reception room. (See next issue.) then passed, after agreeing to the following amend- Electronic Commerce Taxation Moratorium: Sen- ment proposed thereto: (See next issue.) ate agreed to H. Con. Res. 190, urging the United Collins (for Harkin) Amendment No. 2799, to States to seek a global consensus supporting a mora- modify the authorization of appropriations. torium on tariffs and on special, multiple, and dis- (See next issue.) criminatory taxation of electronic commerce. Prostate Cancer Research and Prevention Act: (See next issue.) Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pen- State Funding: Senate passed H.R. 3443, to sions was discharged from further consideration of S. amend part E of title IV of the Social Security Act 1243, to amend the Public Health Service Act to re- to provide States with more funding and greater vise and extend the prostate cancer preventive health flexibility in carrying out programs designed to help program, and the bill was then passed. children make the transition from foster care to self (See next issue.) sufficiency, clearing the measure for the President. Enrollment Correction: Senate agreed to H. Con. (See next issue.) Res. 239, correcting enrollment of H.R. 3194 with Deceptive Mail Prevention and Enforcement a technical change. (See next issue.) Act: Senate concurred in the amendment of the Immigration and Nationality Act Amendments: House to S. 335, to amend Chapter 30 of title 39, Committee on the Judiciary was discharged from United States Code, to provide for the nonmail- further consideration of H.R. 2886, to amend the ability of certain deceptive matter relating to sweep- Immigration and Nationality Act to provide that an stakes, skill contests, facsimile checks, administrative adopted alien who is less than 18 years of age may procedures, orders, and civil penalties relating to be considered a child under such Act if adopted with such matter, clearing the measure for the President. or after a sibling who is a child under such Act, and Pages S14856±63 the bill was then passed, clearing the measure for the Copyright Damages Improvement Act: Senate President. (See next issue.) concurred in the amendment of the House to S. Animal Cruelty Depiction Prohibition: Senate 1257, to amend statutory damages provisions of title passed H.R. 1887, to amend title 18, United States 17, United States Code, with a further amendment Code, to punish the depiction of animal cruelty, proposed thereto: Pages S14891±92 clearing the measure for the President. Page Collins (for Hatch) Amendment No. 2790, to pro- National American Indian Heritage Month: vide for the promulgation of emergency guidelines Senate agreed to S. Res. 216, designating the Month by the United States Sentencing Commission relat- of November 1999 as ‘‘National American Indian ing to criminal infringement of a copyright or trade- Heritage Month’’. (See next issue.) mark. Page S14892
VerDate 29-OCT-99 07:22 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 5627 Sfmt 5627 E:\CR\FM\D19NO9.REC pfrm04 PsN: D19NO9 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — DAILY DIGEST D1329 Veterans’ Compensation Cost-of-Living Adjust- meaningful opportunities to work, clearing the ment Act: Senate concurred in the amendments of measure for the President. (See next issue.) the House to Senate amendment to H.R. 2280, to Consolidated Appropriations Conference Report: amend title 38, United States Code, to provide a By 74 yeas to 24 nays (Vote No. 374), Senate agreed cost-of-living adjustment in rates of compensation to the conference report on H.R. 3194, making con- paid for service-connected disabilities, to enhance the solidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending compensation, memorial affairs, and housing pro- September 30, 2000, clearing the measure for the grams of the Department of Veterans Affairs, to im- President. (See next issue.) prove retirement authorities applicable to judges of During consideration of this measure, the Senate the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans also took the following action: Claims, clearing the measure for the President. By 87 yeas to 9 nays (Vote No. 373), three-fifths (See next issue.) of those Senators duly chosen and sworn having Mississippi Courts: Senate concurred in the amend- voted in the affirmative, Senate agreed to the motion ment of the House to S. 1418, to provide for the to close further debate on the conference report. holding of court at Natchez, Mississippi in the same (See next issue.) manner as court is held at Vicksburg, Mississippi, Standing Rules of the Senate—Agreement: A clearing the measure for the President. unanimous-consent agreement was reached directing (See next issue.) the Committee on Rules and Administration prepare Open-Market Reorganization for the Betterment a revised edition of the Standing Rules of the Senate, of International Telecommunications Act: Senate and that such standing rules be printed as a Senate disagreed to the amendment of the House to S. 376, document. (See next issue.) to amend the Communications Satellite Act of 1962 Bankruptcy Reform Act—Cloture Motion Filed: to promote competition and privatization in satellite A motion was entered to close further debate on S. communications, requested a conference with the 625, to amend title 11, United States Code and, in House thereon, and the Chair was authorized to ap- accordance with Rule XXII of the Standing Rules of point the following conferees on the part of the Sen- the Senate, a vote on the cloture motion will occur ate: Senators McCain, Stevens, Burns, Hollings, and on Tuesday, January 25, 2000, at 12 noon. (See next issue.) Inouye. (See next issue.) Oregon Land Use: Senate concurred in the amend- Nominations Received By The Senate—Agree- ment of the House to S. 416, to direct the Secretary ment: A unanimous-consent agreement was reached of Agriculture to convey the city of Sisters, Oregon, providing that all nominations received by the Sen- ate during the 10th Congress, first session, remain a certain parcel of land for use in connection with in status quo, notwithstanding the November 19, a sewage treatment facility, clearing the measure for 1999 adjournment of the Senate, and the provisions the President. (See next issue.) of rule XXXI, paragraph 6 of the standing rules of Veterans’ Millennium Health Care Act Con- the Senate. (See next issue.) ference Report: Senate agreed to the conference re- University of Alaska Land Conveyance—Agree- port on H.R. 2116, to amend title 38, United States ment: A unanimous-consent-time agreement was Code, to enhance programs providing health care, reached providing for consideration of S. 744, to education, memorial, and other benefits for veterans, provide for the continuation of higher education to authorize major medical facility projects for the through the conveyance of certain public lands in Department of Veterans Affairs, clearing the measure the State of Alaska to the University of Alaska, with for the President. (See next issue.) amendments to be proposed thereto. (See next issue.) Intelligence Authorization Conference Report: Appointment Authority—Agreement: A unani- Senate agreed to the conference report on H.R. mous-consent agreement was reached providing that 1555, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2000 notwithstanding the sine die adjournment of the for intelligence and intelligence-related activities of present session of the Senate, the President of the the United States Government, the Community Senate, the President of the Senate Pro tempore, the Management Account, and the Central Intelligence Majority Leader of the Senate and the Minority Agency Retirement and Disability System, clearing Leader of the Senate be, and they are hereby author- the measure for the President. (See next issue.) ized, to make appointments to commissions, com- Work Incentives Improvement Act Conference mittees, boards, conferences, or interparliamentary Report: By 95 yeas to 1 nay (Vote No. 372), Senate conferences authorized by law, by concurrent action agreed to the conference report on H.R. 1180, to of the two Houses, or by order of the Senate. amend the Social Security Act to expand the avail- (See next issue.) ability of health care coverage for working individ- Authority for Committees: All committees were uals with disabilities, to establish a Ticket to Work authorized to file executive and legislative reports and Self-Sufficiency Program in the Social Security during the adjournment of the Senate on Tuesday, Administration to provide such individuals with December 7, 1999 from 11 a.m. until 1 p.m., and
VerDate 29-OCT-99 07:22 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 5627 Sfmt 5627 E:\CR\FM\D19NO9.REC pfrm04 PsN: D19NO9 D1330 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — DAILY DIGEST November 19, 1999 on Friday, January 7, 2000 from 11 a.m. until 1 Ernest W. DuBester, of New Jersey, to be a Mem- p.m. (See next issue.) ber of the National Mediation Board for a term ex- Appointment: piring July 1, 2001. Joint Committee on Taxation Membership: The Deanna Tanner Okun, of Idaho, to be a Member Chair announced on behalf of the Chairman of the of the United States International Trade Commission Finance Committee, pursuant to section 8002 of title for a term expiring June 16, 2008. 26, U.S. Code, the designation of Senator Hatch as Routine lists in the Coast Guard. a member of the Joint Committee on Taxation, in Nominations Received: Senate received the fol- lieu of the late Senator Chafee. (See next issue.) lowing nominations: Nominations Confirmed: Senate confirmed the fol- E. Douglas Hamilton, of Kentucky, to be United lowing nominations: States Marshal for the Western District of Kentucky Stephen Hadley, of the District of Columbia, to for the term of four years. be a Member of the Board of Directors of the United Francis J. Duggan, of Virginia, to be a Member States Institute of Peace for a term expiring January of the National Mediation Board for a term expiring 19, 2003. July 1, 2003. Zalmay Khalilzad, of Maryland, to be a Member Timothy Earl Jones, Jr., of Georgia, to be a Com- of the Board of Directors of the United States Insti- missioner of the United States Parole Commission tute of Peace for a term expiring January 19, 2001. for a term of six years. John C. Truesdale, of Maryland, to be a Member of the National Labor Relations Board for the term Marie F. Ragghianti, of Tennessee, to be a Com- of five years expiring August 27, 2003. missioner of the United States Parole Commission Paul Steven Miller, of California, to be a Member for a term of six years. of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Routine lists in the Public Health Service. for a term expiring July 1, 2004. (Reappointment) (See next issue.) Irasema Garza, of Maryland, to be Director of the Nominations Withdrawn: Senate received notifica- Women’s Bureau, Department of Labor. tion of the withdrawal of the following nominations: T. Michael Kerr, of the District of Columbia, to Timothy Earl Jones, Jr., of Georgia, to be a Com- be Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, missioner of the United States Parole Commission Department of Labor. for a term of six years, vice George MacKenzie Rast, Anthony Musick, of Virginia, to be Chief Finan- resigned, which was sent to the Senate on July 19, cial Officer, Corporation for National and Commu- 1999. (See next issue.) nity Service. Marie F. Ragghianti, of Maryland, to be a Com- Susan M. Wachter, of Pennsylvania, to be an As- missioner of the United States Parole Commission sistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Develop- for a term of six years, vice Edward F. Reilly, term ment. expired, which was sent to the Senate on July 19, Neal S. Wolin, of Illinois, to be General Counsel 1999. (See next issue.) for the Department of the Treasury. Messages From the House: (See next issue.) Ivan Itkin, of Pennsylvania, to be Director of the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Measures Referred: (See next issue.) Department of Energy. Measures Placed on Calendar: (See next issue.) Richard Linn, of Virginia, to be United States Communications: (See next issue.) Circuit Judge for the Federal Circuit. Statements on Introduced Bills: (See next issue.) Joseph R. Crapa, of Virginia, to be an Assistant Administrator of the United States Agency for Inter- Additional Cosponsors: (See next issue.) national Development. Amendments Submitted: (See next issue.) Alan Phillip Larson, of Iowa, to be Under Sec- Enrolled Measures Presented: (See next issue.) retary of State (Economic, Business and Agricultural Enrolled Measures Signed: (See next issue.) Affairs). Linda J. Bilmes, of California, to be an Assistant Record Votes: Three record votes were taken today. Secretary of Commerce. (Total—374) (See next issue.) Linda J. Bilmes, of California, to be Chief Finan- Adjournment Sine Die: Senate met at 9:30 a.m., cial Officer, Department of Commerce. and, in accordance with the provisions of H. Con. Magdalena G. Jacobsen, of Oregon, to be a Mem- Res. 235, adjourned sine die at 8:49 p.m., until 12 ber of the National Mediation Board for a term ex- noon, on Monday, January 24, 2000. piring July 1, 2002. Francis J. Duggan, of Virginia, to be a Member of the National Mediation Board for a term expiring Committee Meetings July 1, 2000. No committee meetings were held.
VerDate 29-OCT-99 07:22 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 5627 Sfmt 5627 E:\CR\FM\D19NO9.REC pfrm04 PsN: D19NO9 November 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — DAILY DIGEST D1331 House of Representatives Quorum Calls—Votes: No recorded votes or Chamber Action quorum calls developed during the proceedings of Bills Introduced: 3 public bills, H.R. 3511–3513; the House today. and 1 resolution, H. Con. Res. 239, were intro- Adjournment: The House met at 12:00 p.m. and duced. Page H12896 adjourned at 12:26 p.m. Reports Filed: No reports were filed today. Guest Chaplain: The prayer was offered by the Committee Meetings guest Chaplain, Rev. Dr. Ronald Christian of Fair- No committee meetings were held. fax, Virginia. Page H12894 f Recess: The House recessed at 12:20 p.m. and re- convened at 12:25 p.m. Page H12895 CONGRESSIONAL PROGRAM AHEAD Correcting Enrollment: The House agreed to H. Week of November 22 through November 24, Con. Res. 239, directing the Clerk of the House of 1999 Representatives to make a technical correction in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 3194. Pages H12895±96 House Chamber Meeting Hour—Monday, November 22: Agreed Monday, The House will meet at 12:00 p.m. that when the House adjourn today, it adjourn to Tuesday and the Balance of the Week, To be an- meet on Monday, November 22, 1999 at noon. nounced. Page H12896 Any Further Program Will Be Announced Later. Senate Messages: Message received from the Senate House Committees appears on page H12894 No committee meetings are scheduled.
VerDate 29-OCT-99 07:22 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 5627 Sfmt 5627 E:\CR\FM\D19NO9.REC pfrm04 PsN: D19NO9 D1332 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — DAILY DIGEST November 19, 1999
Next Meeting of the SENATE Next Meeting of the HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 12 noon, Monday, January 24 12 noon, Monday, November 22
Senate Chamber House Chamber Program for Monday: Senate will begin a period for the Program for Monday: To be announced. transaction of any routine morning business until 2 p.m.
Extensions of Remarks, as inserted in this issue
HOUSE Fossella, Vito, N.Y., E2467 Porter, John Edward, Ill., E2484 Gonzalez, Charles A., Tex., E2460, E2474 Portman, Rob, Ohio, E2480 Armey, Richard K., Tex., E2487 Goodlatte, Bob, Va., E2461 Quinn, Jack, N.Y., E2461, E2463 Baird, Brian, Wash., E2464 Greenwood, James C., Pa., E2464 Roybal-Allard, Lucille, Calif., E2483 Baldwin, Tammy, Wisc., E2482 Hooley, Darlene, Ore., E2459 Royce, Edward R., Calif., E2477 Barton, Joe, Tex., E2477 Lantos, Tom, Calif., E2479 Ryan, Paul, Wisc., E2480 Berry, Marion, Ark., E2479 McInnis, Scott, Colo., E2460, E2463, E2466 Sanders, Bernard, Vt., E2481 Bilbray, Brian P., Calif., E2468 McKeon, Howard P. ‘‘Buck’’, Calif., E2478 Sherman, Brad, Calif., E2468 Bonior, David E., Mich., E2482 Maloney, Carolyn B., N.Y., E2479 Smith, Christopher H., N.J., E2477 Burton, Dan, Ind., E2487 Markey, Edward J., Mass., E2486 Talent, James M., Mo., E2484 Davis, Danny K., Ill., E2459, E2461 Meek, Carrie P., Fla., E2467 Tauzin, W.J. (Billy), La., E2457, E2487 DeLauro, Rosa L., Conn., E2467 Menendez, Robert, N.J., E2466 Thompson, Mike, Calif., E2466 Doyle, Michael F., Pa., E2646 Miller, George, Calif., E2480 Udall, Mark, Colo., E2460, E2462, E2465 Ehlers, Vernon J., Mich., E2476 Myrick, Sue Wilkins, N.C., E2487 Udall, Tom, N.M., E2457, E2461, E2463, E2467, E2476 Engel, Eliot L., N.Y., E2460, E2462, E2466, E2468 Northup, Anne M., Ky., E2467 Underwood, Robert A., Guam, E2484 Etheridge, Bob, N.C., E2478 Oberstar, James L., Minn., E2482 Visclosky, Peter J., Ind., E2465 Fletcher, Ernie, Ky., E2481 Oxley, Michael G., Ohio, E2481
E PL UR UM IB N U U S The public proceedings of each House of Congress, as reported by the Official Reporters thereof, are printed pursuant to directions Congressional Record of the Joint Committee on Printing as authorized by appropriate provisions of Title 44, United States Code, and published for each day that one or both Houses are in session, excepting very infrequent instances when two or more unusually small consecutive issues are printed at one time. ¶ Public access to the Congressional Record is available online through GPO Access, a service of the Government Printing Office, free of charge to the user. The online database is updated each day the Congressional Record is published. The database includes both text and graphics from the beginning of the 103d Congress, 2d session (January 1994) forward. It is available on the Wide Area Information Server (WAIS) through the Internet and via asynchronous dial-in. Internet users can access the database by using the World Wide Web; the Superintendent of Documents home page address is http://www.access.gpo.gov/suldocs, by using local WAIS client software or by telnet to swais.access.gpo.gov, then login as guest (no password required). Dial-in users should use communications software and modem to call (202) 512–1661; type swais, then login as guest (no password required). For general information about GPO Access, contact the GPO Access User Support Team by sending Internet e-mail to [email protected], or a fax to (202) 512–1262; or by calling Toll Free 1–888–293–6498 or (202) 512–1530 between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern time, Monday through Friday, except for Federal holidays. ¶ The Congressional Record paper and 24x microfiche will be furnished by mail to subscribers, free of postage, at the following prices: paper edition, $165.00 for six months, $325.00 per year, or purchased for $2.75 per issue, payable in advance; microfiche edition, $141.00 per year, or purchased for $1.50 per issue payable in advance. The semimonthly Congressional Record Index may be purchased for the same per issue prices. Mail orders to: Superintendent of Documents, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250–7954, or phone orders to (202) 512–1800, or fax to (202) 512–2250. Remit check or money order, made payable to the Superintendent of Documents, or use VISA, MasterCard, Discover, or GPO Deposit Account. ¶ Following each session of Congress, the daily Congressional Record is revised, printed, permanently bound and sold by the Superintendent of Documents in individual parts or by sets. ¶ With the exception of copyrighted articles, there are no restrictions on the republication of material from the Congressional Record.
VerDate 29-OCT-99 07:22 Nov 20, 1999 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 0664 Sfmt 0664 E:\CR\FM\D19NO9.REC pfrm04 PsN: D19NO9