Morton's Ranking of Races by Cranial Capacity Author(s): Stephen Jay Gould Reviewed work(s): Source: Science, New Series, Vol. 200, No. 4341 (May 5, 1978), pp. 503-509 Published by: American Association for the Advancement of Science Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1746562 . Accessed: 12/06/2012 22:38 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. American Association for the Advancement of Science is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Science. http://www.jstor.org work with our own hands; we will speak our own minds" (4, 5). Morton's work was hailed as a jewel of American science. Jules Marcou re- marked that no zoologist except the great Cuvier had so influenced the thought of America's most illustrious Morton's Ranking of Races scientificimmigrant, Louis Agassiz (5, p. 102).On the occasion of Morton'sdeath, by Cranial Capacity the New York Tribune exclaimed that "probablyno scientific man in America enjoyed a higher reputation among Unconscious manipulationof data scholars throughoutthe world than Dr. may be a scientific norm. Morton" (5, p. 144). Mortondid not achieve his reputation by astute interpretationor ingenuity of Stephen Jay Gould speculation-American science had been plaguedby too high a ratio of theo- ry to data.