DOCSLIB.ORG

Coral Sea Marine Park Advisory Committee Meeting #5 Communique 8 June 2021, MS Teams

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coral Sea Marine Park Advisory Committee Meeting #5 Communique 8 June 2021, MS Teams Coral Sea Marine Park Advisory Committee Meeting #5 Communique 8 June 2021, MS Teams The Coral Sea Marine Park (CSMP) Advisory Attendees Committee held a virtual meeting on Tuesday Russell Gueho (Chair) 8 June 2021. Andrew Hoey Clive Wilkinson The Committee was briefed by Dr Barbara Col McKenzie Musso (Acting Assistant Secretary, Marine and Craig Stephen Doug Sanderson Island Parks Branch) on key issues. Michelle Grady • The Ocean Leadership Package, Apologies announced by the Prime Minister on Chrissy Warren Russ Babcock 23 April 2021 is an additional $100 million Ryan Donnelly investment towards managing ocean Larissa Hale (resigned) habitat and coastal environments, and Observers contributing to the global task of reducing Chris Cochrane (Great Barrier Reef Marine Park emissions. Authority) • The Government has appointed a Senior Tina Alderson (Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service) Advisory Group on Joint Management Melinda McLean (Torres Strait Regional Arrangements to provide independent Authority) advice on the governance, structure and Darci Wallis, Steve Bolton and Saiful Marbun (Australian Fisheries Management Authority) culture of the management of jointly managed National Parks. Guests Barbara Musso (Assistant Secretary, Marine and The Committee was given an overview of Island Parks Branch, Parks Australia) fisheries managed by the Queensland Kimberly Foster and Tony Ham (Fisheries Queensland) Government in the CSMP by Fisheries Queensland. Sea cucumber, coral, aquarium Assessments and Authorisations Program fish, trawl, charter and recreational fisheries Nine authorisations have been issued since are to be managed under harvest strategies. Meeting 4: research and monitoring (4), use Parks Australia provided an update on key of a drone or other non-commercial remote management program activities. A summary piloted aircraft (1), commercial tourism (3), of these actions is provided: and commercial media (1). Since July 2018, 55 authorisations have been issued. parksaustralia.gov.au/marine The Committee was presented the draft Indigenous Engagement Program Australian Marine Parks (AMP) Authorisations Parks Australia is taking a co-design approach and Assessments Policy. The policy is a to developing an Indigenous engagement and guidance tool for assessment of proposed cultural heritage strategy for Australian activities in AMPs. Marine Parks. The strategy aims to improve understanding of cultural heritage in the Compliance Program Three compliance incidents were recorded in parks, link management with sea country the CSMP since November 2020. The plans, and maximise employment and incidents related to commercial tourism and enterprise opportunities for Traditional charter operations occurring without Owners. authorisation. Quarterly reports documenting Parks Protection and Management Program incidence of non-compliance observed across The Australian Marine Parks Guideline for the the Australian Marine Parks network are authorisation of commercial tourism and available on the Compliance webpage. general use activities on islands in the Coral Sea, Ashmore Reef and Cartier Island Marine Marine Science Program Coral Sea Coral Reef Health: 2020-2021 Parks is available on the website. project Communication, Education and Awareness In response to the 2020 severe coral Program bleaching event in the CSMP, Parks Australia The fourth Australia-New Caledonia Coral Sea contracted Newsletter is available at: Coral Sea - discover. James Cook University to undertake a Tourism and Visitor Experience Program comprehensive assessment of the condition The draft Australian Marine Parks Tourism of coral and fish communities. A report is Strategy was shared with the Committee for expected in August 2021. comment. The Strategy will be finalised later in 2021. Coral Sea Island Health Project Parks Australia is working closely with the Next Meeting Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, The next Committee meeting will be held in researchers, and volunteer botanists to assess November 2021. For more information about the health of islands in the Coral Sea. the Coral Sea Marine Park or the Committee: Reports from two Coral Sea Island Health Visit parksaustralia.gov.au/coralsea assessment voyages are now available on the Email [email protected] Parks Australia website: Environmental Assessment of the Coringa Islets and Herald Cays in the Coral Sea Marine Park Vegetation Assessment and Mapping of South Islet (Willis Islets), Coral Sea Marine Park The next voyage is planned for mid-2021 to survey 25 islands and cays in the central region of the CSMP. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vegetation Assessment and Mapping of South Islet Coral Sea Marine Park
    Report Vegetation Assessment and Mapping of South Islet (Willis Islets), Coral Sea Marine Park Prepared by Joy Brushe For Parks Australia, the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment January 2021 Acknowledgements Organising and undertaking the vegetation survey field trip to Willis Island required the assistance of many people. The contribution of following people and organisations are acknowledged: My husband Larry for assisting in preparation for and participation during the field survey and for proof reading the report. Bureau of Meteorology (BoM) for providing the opportunity to undertake the survey and particularly the staff of the BoM hub in Cairns and the officers stationed on Willis Island for their hospitality and assistance prior to and during the field visit and during our day in Cairns after arriving back from the voyage. The captain and crew of the “Spirit of Freedom” who looked after us very well during our sea voyage and provided assistance in loading and unloading gear. Staff and Management of Parks Australia (Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment) particularly Stephanie Lemm (Senior Marine Parks Officer, Marine Parks Branch) and Narelle Southam for obtaining the necessary permits, organising the required training and certifications for the survey participants and assisting with purchase and supply of field gear; Carolyn Armstrong for GIS support and Stephanie Lemm for proof reading and providing input into the report. SGS Cairns International analyses of the soil samples. i Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 6 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Objectives of the Willis Island Vegetation Survey .............................................................. 7 1.2 Limitations of the Vegetation Survey and Mapping ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CBD Sixth National Report
    Australia’s Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity 2014 2018 ‒ 24 March 2020 © Commonwealth of Australia 2020 Ownership of intellectual property rights Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights) in this publication is owned by the Commonwealth of Australia (referred to as the Commonwealth). Creative Commons licence All material in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence except content supplied by third parties, logos and the Commonwealth Coat of Arms. Inquiries about the licence and any use of this document should be emailed to [email protected]. Cataloguing data This report should be attributed as: Australia’s Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity 2014‒2018, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, 2020 CC BY 4.0. ISBN 978-1-76003-255-5 This publication is available at http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/international/un-convention-biological-diversity. Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment GPO Box 858 Canberra ACT 2601 Telephone 1800 900 090 Web awe.gov.au The Australian Government acting through the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment has exercised due care and skill in preparing and compiling the information and data in this publication. Notwithstanding, the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, its employees and advisers disclaim all liability, including liability for negligence and for any loss, damage, injury, expense or cost incurred by any person as a result of accessing, using or relying on any of the information or data in this publication to the maximum extent permitted by law.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Horizontal Falls Marine Park
    Commonwealth Marine Reserves Review National Parks Association of Queensland Submission 30th March 2015 The National Parks Association of Queensland (NPAQ) promotes the preservation, expansion and appropriate management of National Parks and the wider protected area estate in Queensland. NPAQ has a strong interest in Australian Marine Parks. NPAQ's submission refers explicitly to the Coral Sea Marine Reserve, and reiterates points made by Save our Marine Life and the Protect Our Coral Sea Alliances. Like these and other conservation groups, NPAQ believes that the existing zoning in all Commonwealth Marine Reserves should be retained, that the marine national park zones should be improved and expanded, and that the marine reserves should be established immediately. Retain Marine National Park Zones The Coral Sea Marine Reserve contains Australia’s largest Marine National Park Zone which extends over 51% of the Marine Reserve. This is one of the few places in the world where a large marine sanctuary for tropical marine life can be established, making the conservation values of this area globally significant. The Marine National Park Zones reproclaimed by the Coalition Government in December 2013 represent a compromise between these values and a desire to keep certain areas within the reserve open to commercial and/or recreational fishers. The broad structure of this compromise was first outlined in 2011 with the release of the draft plan for the Coral Sea Marine Reserve - largely welcomed by both commercial and recreational fishers. Over 70% of the commercial fishing interests displaced by the Coral Sea Marine Reserve stated that they would prefer to see simpler management arrangements involving increased protection down to 22oS, provided adequate structural adjustment assistance was available.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2009
    Australian Marine Conservation Society ANNUAL REPORT 2009 Australian Marine Conservation Society ANNUAL REPORT 2009 1 Table of CONTENTS OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................................... 1 PrESIDENT’S REPORT .............................................................................................................................. 3 CAMPAIGN REPORT .................................................................................................................................. 5 Overfishing .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Sharks: ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Sustainable fisheries: ................................................................................................................ 6 Sustainable Seafood: ................................................................................................................ 6 Marine National Parks ....................................................................................................................... 7 Coral Sea .................................................................................................................................... 8 Top End Sea Life ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Researchonline@JCU
    ResearchOnline@JCU This is the author-created version of the following work: Harrison, Hugo B., Álvarez-Noriega, Mariana, Baird, Andrew H., Heron, Scott F., Macdonald, Chancey, and Hughes, Terry P. (2019) Back-to-back coral bleaching events on isolated atolls in the Coral Sea. Coral Reefs, 38 (4) pp. 713- 719. Access to this file is available from: https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/60330/ © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018 Please refer to the original source for the final version of this work: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338%2D018%2D01749%2D6 Harrison et al. Back to back Coral Sea bleaching 1 2 Back to back coral bleaching events on isolated atolls in the Coral Sea 3 4 Hugo B. Harrison1, Mariana Álvarez-Noriega1, 2, Andrew H. Baird1, Scott F. Heron3,4,5, Chancey 5 MacDonald1,2, Terry P. Hughes1 6 7 8 1 Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, 9 Queensland 4811, Australia 10 2 College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia 11 3 Coral Reef Watch, US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, College Park, Maryland 20740, USA 12 4 ReefSense, Townsville, Queensland 4814, Australia 13 5 Marine Geophysical Laboratory, College of Science, Technology and Engineering, James Cook University, 14 Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia 15 16 17 Abstract: Severe bleaching events caused by marine heatwaves over the past four decades 18 have now affected almost every coral reef ecosystem in the world. These recurring events 19 have led to major losses of coral cover, with adverse consequences for troPical reef 20 ecosystems and the peoPle who dePend on them.
    [Show full text]
  • Template 6 Number of Submissions Using This Template: 5,011
    Template 6 Number of submissions using this template: 5,011 TO: Director of National Parks, Ms Sally Barnes CC: Minister for the Environment and Energy, Josh Frydenberg; Tony Burke MP 1. I am deeply concerned about cutbacks to National Park zone (IUCN II/ ‘sanctuary’) protection in Australia’s marine parks network. 2. The network should be science-based, and therefore deliver adequately sized and located National Park zones (IUCN II/ ‘sanctuaries’) on both the continental shelf and in deeper waters. 3. I am deeply concerned that oil and gas exploration continues to be allowed in regions where an oil spill could devastate the Marine Parks system, especially in the ecologically sensitive Great Australian Bight. Oil and gas exploration have no place in our Marine Parks, or in areas where oil spills could impact critical sanctuaries, and should be excluded from the entire Commonwealth Marine Reserve System and the Great Australian Bight. 4. I support the draft management plans where the National Park zones have not changed from what was declared in 2012, or where there are new and/or increased National Park zones, namely: the new National Park zone transect and National Park zone areas over the canyon in the Bremer Marine Park; the new National Park zone transect over the Swan Canyon in the SW Corner Marine Park; the increased National Park zone area in the Two Rocks Marine Park; and the new National Park zone area at Oceanic Shoals. 5. I reject the draft management plans where: National Park zone areas are made smaller (for example, the Coral Sea Marine Park, Cape York West Marine Park, Gascoyne Marine Park, Argo Rowley Terrace Marine Park, the SW Corner Marine Park [Diamantina Fracture Zone section], Lord Howe Marine Park, Dampier Marine Park and Twilight Marine Park); removed altogether (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Foraging Niche Specialisation and Resource Use in Tropical Seabirds: Implications for Management
    ResearchOnline@JCU This file is part of the following work: Miller, Mark (2018) Foraging niche specialisation and resource use in tropical seabirds: implications for management. PhD thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: https://doi.org/10.25903/5b5e4cf5655f8 Copyright © 2018 Mark Miller. The author has certified to JCU that they have made a reasonable effort to gain permission and acknowledge the owner of any third party copyright material included in this document. If you believe that this is not the case, please email [email protected] Foraging niche specialisation and resource use in tropical seabirds: implications for management Thesis submitted by Mark Miller BSc.(Hons), MSc. for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the College of Science and Engineering James Cook University Acknowledgements During this project I have had the privilege of getting to know a group of truly awe-inspiring animals. This research has allowed me, and hopefully the reader, the opportunity to understand and admire their lives on a deeper level. Firstly, I would like to thank my supervisor Brad Congdon who allowed me the freedom to find my own path while keeping me on the tracks. Your ability to make me ask the right questions of my garbled and excited ideas has undoubtedly improved the way I think, and your depth of knowledge and linguistic skills are truly inspiring - if I've absorbed any of them then I am certainly a better scientist for it. A huge thanks also goes to my secondary supervisor Nicholas Carlile. Your enthusiasm for seabirds, and drive for doing conservation science the right way are a huge motivation.
    [Show full text]
  • In Marine Protected Areas Authors
    Title: Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) in marine protected areas Authors: Renee Albrecht1,2, Carly N. Cook3, Olive Andrews4,5, Kelsey E. Roberts6,3, Martin F. J. Taylor7, Michael B. Mascia1, Rachel E. Golden Kroner1 Affiliations: 1 –Moore Center for Science, Conservation International, 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 600, Arlington, VA 22202, USA 2 –Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, University of California - Santa Barbara, 2400 Bren Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA 3 –School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800 Australia 4 –Whaleology, 37 Hekerua Road, Oneroa, Auckland, New Zealand 5 –Conservation International, University of Auckland Building 302, Room 331, 23 Symonds Street, Auckland 1010, New Zealand 6 –School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, 145 Endeavor Hall Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA 7 –World Wildlife Fund-Australia, 4/340 Adelaide Street, Brisbane QLD 4179, Australia 1 Highlights ● Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) affects MPAs ● We documented patterns, trends, and causes of enacted and proposed PADDD in MPAs ● Widespread downgrading in Australia authorized commercial and recreation fishing ● Downgrades to the Coral Sea Marine Park constitute the largest PA downgrade to date ● Science and policy responses are required to safeguard MPAs in the long term Abstract Marine protected areas (MPAs) are foundational to global marine biodiversity conservation efforts. Recently, countries have rapidly scaled up their MPA networks to meet targets established by the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). While MPA networks are intended to permanently safeguard marine ecosystems, evidence points to widespread legal changes that temper, reduce, or eliminate protected areas, known as protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD).
    [Show full text]
  • Coral Sea, Great Barrier Reef and New Caledonia Marine Parks
    Papua New Mer Eastern Guinea Island Fields Ashmore Reef Solomon Islands Lockhart .! 0 500 1,000 1,500 River nm Osprey Reef Coral Sea Shark Reef Marine Park Vema Reef Natural Park of the Coral Sea Bougainville (New Caledonia) Reef Diane Cooktown.! Moore Bank Reefs Willis Islets Holmes Reefs Herald .! Cays Lihou Cairns Flinders Reef Vanuatu Reefs Mellish Tregrosse Reef Reefs Entrecasteaux Marion Reef Townsville .! Chesterfield Plateau New Caledonia Great Barrier Reef Landsdown Marine Park Bank Kenn Frederick Reefs .! Reefs Mackay Bellona Plateau QUEENSLAND Saumarez Reefs Wreck Reefs Cato .! Reef 0 200 400 600 Rockhampton km Gladstone .! Approximate scale Fraser 0 100 200 300 Seamount nm Projection: Geographics Datum: GDA94 (effectively WGS84) Bundaberg .! Spatial data sources: Temperate East Marine Region AFMA (2012): Eastern Tuna and Billfish Fishery Management Plan 2010 AMSA (IMO) (2015): Area To Be Avoided and Two Way Routes Gifford DoEE (2018): Australia's Network of Marine Parks Marine Park DoEE (2018): Collaborative Australian Protected Areas Database Flanders Marine Institute (2018). Maritime Boundaries Geodatabase v3 ESRI (2015): World Ocean Base Layer Geoscience Australia (2014): Australian Maritime Boundaries (AMB) v3.0 Central Eastern Geoscience Australia (2003): GEODATA TOPO 2.5M Marine Park Norfolk Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (2004): Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Zoning Marine Park Queensland Department of Primary Industries (1996): Offshore Constitutional Settlement (OCS) Arrangements for Queensland Fisheries
    [Show full text]
  • European Union Overseas Coastal and Marine Protected Areas
    European Union Overseas Coastal and Marine Protected Areas Overview of coastal and marine conservation efforts in the European Union’s Overseas Countries and Territories and Outermost Regions Carole Martinez, Sylvie Rockel, Caroline Vieux IUCN GLOBAL MARINE AND POLAR PROGRAMME European Union Overseas Coastal and Marine Protected Areas Overview of coastal and marine conservation efforts in the European Union’s Overseas Countries and Territories and Outermost Regions Carole Martinez, Sylvie Rockel, Caroline Vieux This publication has been made possible by funding from the French Development Agency (AFD). The designation of geographical entities in this document and the presentation of the materials do neither imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland Copyright: © 2017 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: Martinez, C., Rockel, S., Vieux, C. European Overseas coastal and
    [Show full text]
  • Template 7 Number of Submissions Using This Template: 2,945
    Template 7 Number of submissions using this template: 2,945 Dear Director of National Parks (CC Minister Frydenberg, Tony Burke MP), At the 2030 World Conservation Congress scientists set an evidence-based target that 30% of the ocean should be protected by 2030. The government’s proposed changes to Australia’s marine parks network represent a giant step backward from our commitment to ocean protection. The biological and societal benefits of marine reserves are clear. It is well established that genuine marine reserves protect wildlife and also support productive fisheries and other uses of the marine environment. Crucially, they enhance the ocean’s resilience against the impacts of climate change, and mitigate its effects, promoting increased well-being for coastal communities. Resilience is greatest in reserves that are large long-established, well-managed and have full protections from all extractive activities including mining and its associated exploration. In the face of devastating coral bleaching, depleting global fisheries, mangrove dieback and vanishing kelp forests, Australia’s Commonwealth Marine Reserves are even more important than ever. As an Australian who wants to buy sustainable local seafood for my family, and support local fishing jobs, I value the role marine parks can play in ensuring that‘s possible for the long term. Therefore, I am opposed to any rollback of marine parks especially in critical areas like the Coral Sea, and I strongly support real protection from oil and gas mining in the uniquely biodiverse and productive Great Australian Bight which is currently at risk from oil exploration. In particular: 1. I am strongly opposed to any reduction in fully-protected National Park zones in Australia’s marine parks network - science tells us these no-take areas are critical if marine reserves are to give us full benefit; 2.
    [Show full text]
  • ACRS Submission CMR Sept 20 2017
    Australian Coral Reef Society Inc. A society promoting scientific study of Australian Coral Reefs ACRS Correspondence: c/- Biological Sciences The University of Queensland, St Lucia QLD 4072 PH: (07) 3365 1686, e: [email protected] Submission to the Australian Marine Parks Network (AMPN) Draft Management Plans 20 September 2017 Ms Sally Barnes Director of National Parks Australian Marine Parks Management Planning Comments Reply Paid 787 Canberra ACT 2601 Dear Ms Barnes: On behalf of the Australian Coral Reef Society (ACRS), we appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Australian Marine Parks Network (AMPN) Draft Management Plans released on 21 July 2017. The ACRS is the worlds’ oldest coral reef society (established 1922) and is the professional organisation for Australia’s coral reef scientists and managers. We are concerned with the study and protection of coral reefs, and have played a prominent role in bringing major conservation issues to the attention of governments and the general public. The society regularly draws on the expertise of its 300+ members to provide advice to governments and agencies on a range of marine issues (see http://www.australiancoralreefsociety.org/). The 2012 AMPN expansion made progress towards an evidence-based network of marine parks and indicated Australia’s global leadership in marine conservation. In its 2016 submission, ACRS expressed its support for the July 2012 expansion of the AMPN into four marine regions and the Coral Sea following decades of research and extensive community consultation. However, in consideration of the reports from the Bioregional Advisory Panel (Buxton and Cochrane 2015) and the Expert Scientific Panel (Beeton et al.
    [Show full text]