DOCSLIB.ORG

Conference Proceedings 01 September

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conference Proceedings 01 September Regulation Review Committee Parliament of New South Wales Proceedings of the International Conference on Regulation Reform Management and Scrutiny of Legislation Parliament House, Sydney 9 - 13 July 2001 Report No 19/52 November 2001 This report was compiled using Microsoft Word 97 and printed by Parliamentary Printing Services New South Wales Parliamentary Library cataloguing-in-publication data: International Conference on Regulation Reform Management and Scrutiny of Legislation (2001 : Sydney, N.S.W.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Regulation Reform Management and Scrutiny of Legislation, Parliament House, Sydney, 9-13 July 2001. [Sydney, N.S.W.] : Regulation Review Committee, Parliament of New South Wales, 2001. – 1 v. (various foliations) ; 30 cm. (Report no. 19/52, September 2001) ISBN 0 7347 6826 5 1. Delegated legislation—Congresses. I. Parliament of New South Wales. Regulation Review Committee. II. Title III. Series: New South Wales. Parliament. Regulation Review Committee. Report ; 52/19 348.025 (DDC21) _________________________________________________________________ International Conference on Regulation Reform Management & Scrutiny of Legislation 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS COMMITTEE AND SECRETARIAT MEMBERS……………………………………………..1 CHAIRMAN’S FOREWORD…………………………………………………………..……….2 CONFERENCE PROGRAM…………………………………………..………………..……….4 PHOTO OF CONFERENCE DELEGATES….………………….….…………..……..……..12 LIST OF DELEGATES……………………………..………………………..…………...……13 TRANSCRIPTS OF PROCEEDINGS……………………………………..………..……….18 Monday 9 July 2001 Welcome: Mr Peter R. Nagle MP….……………………………………….…..…………………..………….19 Official Opening: Her Excellency Professor Marie Bashir AC……………………….………………...22 The Hon Chief Justice Murray Gleeson AC……………………………………………………….………..24 The Hon Chief Justice James Spigelman………………………….……………….……………………….30 Lord Mayhew OF Twysden …..…….…………………………………………….………………………..…….36 Tuesday 10 July 2001 Mr Gary Banks…………………………………….………………………………………….………….……………45 Mr Steve Gilchrist MPP.………………………………………..……………………………………….………….53 Mr Peter Nagle MP……………………………………………………………………………………..….…………63 Ms Sue Holmes……………………………………………………….…………………………………...………….72 Workshop One: Dr Philippa Tudor……………………….………………….…………………….….……….82 Workshop Two: Mr Luigi Carbone…………………….………………………..…..…………………………99 Wednesday 11 July 2001 Mr Peter Pike MP………………………………………………………………………………………………….…118 Mr Richard Worth MP……………………………………….………………….…..…….………………………127 Workshop One: Senator Helen Coonan…………………………………..………………………….…….158 Mr Paul Bek & Ms Jennifer Bryant………….….……………………………….….165 Workshop Two: Ms Sue Holmes……………..………………………………..……………………………..177 Thursday 12 July 2001 Hon Norman George…………………………………..………………………………..….…………………….193 Professor John Braithwaite……………………………………………………………………….………..……200 Mr Firoz Cachalia MPL…………………….………………………………………..……….……….…………..206 Dr Liz Kernohan MP………………………………………………………………………………………..………209 Hon Malcolm Jones MLC………………………………………………………………………………..…….….213 Mr Russell Turner MP………………………………………………………………………………………………216 Ms Marianne Saliba MP………………………………………………………………………..………….………218 Mr Andrew Homer……………..………………………………………………………………….……………….220 Hon Angus Redford MLC……………………………………………………………..………………………….222 Hon Geoff Squibb MLC………………………………………………………………..……………………..…..223 Dr Philippa Tudor……………………………………………………………………………………………………224 Mr Greg McLean………………………………………………………………………..…………………………..224 Mr Ray Molomo………………………………………………………………………………………………………225 Senator Barney Cooney…………………………………………………………….…………………..………..225 Mr Peter Pike MP………………………………………………………………………………………..………….226 Hon John Hargreaves MLA……………………………………………………………………………..……….227 Friday 13 July 2001 Mr Chandra Gowda…………………………………………………………………………………………………229 Mr David Simeon……………………………………………..…………………………………………………….237 Mr Mick Bates………………………………………………………………………………………..….…………..239 Professor Margaret Allars…………………………………………………………………………………………247 Senator Barney Cooney………………………………………………………………………………..…………256 CONFERENCE RESOLUTIONS……………………..………………………….………….266 SPEAKERS PAPERS…………………………………………………………………..……..267 _________________________________________________________________ International Conference on Regulation Reform Management & Scrutiny of Legislation 2 APPENDIX: FINANCIAL STATEMENT _________________________________________________________________ International Conference on Regulation Reform Management & Scrutiny of Legislation 3 COMMITTEE AND SECRETARIAT MEMBERS Mr Gerard Martin, MP, Chairman Hon Janelle Saffin, MLC, Vice Chairman Hon Malcolm Jones, MLC, Hon Don Harwin, MLC, Dr Liz Kernohan, MP, Ms Marianne Saliba, MP, Mr Russell Turner, MP, Mr Graham West, MP, Mr Peter R Nagle MP, Chairman of the Regulation Review Committee, resigned from Parliament on 13 July 2001 SECRETARIAT Mr Jim Jefferis, Committee Manager Mr Greg Hogg, Project Officer Mr Don Beattie, Committee Officer Ms Rachel Dart, Assistant Committee Officer _________________________________________________________________ International Conference on Regulation Reform Management & Scrutiny of Legislation 4 CHAIRMAN'S FORWORD It is a pleasure to present the proceedings of the International Conference on Regulation Reform Management and Scrutiny of Legislation. These proceedings are Part 2 of the scheme by the Regulation Review Committee to improve regulatory management and controls in New South Wales. Part one of that enterprise, entitled Re-Engineering Regulations in New South Wales for the Twenty-First Century, is comprised in Report No 9/52, tabled in Parliament in June 2000. Part 3, to be published separately, will deal exclusively with the Australian viewpoint on regulatory management and reform. Part 4 will contain recommendations for change to the New South Wales regulatory system. The proceedings of this international conference show the importance accredited world wide to effective regulatory management and scrutiny of legislation. Lord Mayhew in his address said that almost all of the 29 OECD member countries now have a regulatory reform program in place. In the 1980’s there were only three or four. In his keynote address, the Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia, Chief Justice Gleeson, spoke of the vast increase in the bulk of legislation and that in many areas the burden of compliance with regulations, in terms of knowledge, time and exposure, is so great that citizens give up the attempt. This indicates how important it is to have in place effective scrutiny mechanisms that test the justification for new and existing laws and that screen out unnecessary ones. We are fortunate to have had strong OECD participation and the workshop on the role of Parliament in ensuring the quality of law and regulation will have a lasting usefulness for us all. All scrutiny committee’s depend for their success particularly on support at the Ministerial level. The OECD has put this repeatedly at the top of its list in terms of importance. The excellent address by the Hon Justice Spigelman, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, contains a wealth of cautionary advice on permitting the regulatory decision-making process to be dominated by matters that are capable of measurement at the expense of qualitative considerations. The former he says, have acquired an entirely inappropriate significance by reason of their concreteness. The Chief Justice concluded his address with the words: “In my opinion it is of some significance to appreciate that the importance of what can be measured varies from one area of discourse to the other. There is a tendency in the literature on cost-benefit analysis and performance indicators to act on the assumption that the methodology is equally appropriate to any area of discourse. That is not the case, in my opinion. There are some areas of government regulation or public administration in which the things that can be measured are the important things. There are other areas – and the law is one of those areas – in which the things that can be measured are not central to the objectives and functions preformed by the organisations involved. Computation _________________________________________________________________ International Conference on Regulation Reform Management & Scrutiny of Legislation 5 can be of great utility. However, in significant areas there is no escaping the centrality of judgement of a qualitative character”. Ms Sue Holmes, on behalf of the OECD, gave us a reassuring response on this issue by saying that while quantification of costs and benefits is considered the best practice, the OECD has also said that the most important contributor to the quality of regulatory decisions is not the precision of calculations but the action of analysing, questioning, understanding real-world impacts and exploring assumptions. The transcript and papers in these proceedings contains a discussion and analysis of many fundamental regulatory problems. It was the basic objective of our New South Wales Committee to produce this type of dialogue so that the usefulness of the Conference could continue well after the close of it. At the closing session my colleague, Mr Peter Nagle MP, thanked all delegates and all those who assisted in the organisation of the Conference, in particular the Hon John Murray MP, Speaker of the Legislative Assembly of New South Wales and the Hon Dr Meredith Burgmann, President of the Legislative Council. The importance of the Conference is reflected in the resolution of the delegates to accept the generous invitation of Mr Steve Gilchrist, Co-Chair of the Ontario Red Tape Commission, to host the next International Conference
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hand Book for Members of Karnataka Legislative Council
    HAND BOOK FOR MEMBERS OF KARNATAKA LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL INTRODUCTION This Hand Book has been brought out for acquainting the Members with the salient features of the procedure in the House and the periods of notice with regard to legislative and other business coming up before the House and several facilities available to them. Part I contains the Instructions about giving notice of Questions, Motions, etc., under the Rules of Procedure. Part II contains facilities provided to each member of Legislative Council. Part III contains the Acts and Rules which are of special interest to members. It is hoped that this publication would be useful to Hon’ble members. For any further and detailed information, members may refer to the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Council and relevant Articles of the Constitution of India. Any suggestions for it’s improvement are whole heartedly accepted. K.R. MAHALAKSHMI Bangalore Secretary (I/c) Sept. 2018 Karnataka Legislative Council i Part I - Legislative Business Page Nos. 1. Composition of Legislative Council 1-1 2. Duration of Legislative Council 1-1 3. Sessions of the Legislative Council 2-2 4. Oath or Affirmation by Members 2-3 5. Governor's Address 3-5 6. Election of Chairman / Deputy Chairman 5-5 7. Recognition of Parties or Group 6-6 8. Seating of Members 6-6 9. Time and Duration of Sittings 6-6 10. Government Business 7-7 11. Private Members Business 7-7 12. Quorum 7-7 13. Adjournment Motions 7-9 14. Discussion on Matters of Urgent Public Importance for Short Duration 9-9 15.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 March 2010 (Extract from Book 3)
    EXTRACT FROM BOOK PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL FIFTY-SIXTH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION Tuesday, 9 March 2010 (Extract from book 3) Internet: www.parliament.vic.gov.au/downloadhansard By authority of the Victorian Government Printer The Governor Professor DAVID de KRETSER, AC The Lieutenant-Governor The Honourable Justice MARILYN WARREN, AC The ministry Premier, Minister for Veterans’ Affairs and Minister for Multicultural Affairs....................................................... The Hon. J. M. Brumby, MP Deputy Premier, Attorney-General and Minister for Racing............ The Hon. R. J. Hulls, MP Treasurer, Minister for Information and Communication Technology, and Minister for Financial Services.............................. The Hon. J. Lenders, MLC Minister for Regional and Rural Development, and Minister for Industry and Trade............................................. The Hon. J. M. Allan, MP Minister for Health............................................... The Hon. D. M. Andrews, MP Minister for Energy and Resources, and Minister for the Arts........... The Hon. P. Batchelor, MP Minister for Police and Emergency Services, and Minister for Corrections................................................... The Hon. R. G. Cameron, MP Minister for Community Development.............................. The Hon. L. D’Ambrosio, MP Minister for Agriculture and Minister for Small Business.............. The Hon. J. Helper, MP Minister for Finance, WorkCover and the Transport Accident Commission,
    [Show full text]
  • Recorder Official Organ of the Melbourne Branch of the Australian Society for the Study of Labour History Issue No 263—October 2009
    Registered by Australia Post PRINT POST 306‐181‐0004‐ISSN 0155‐8722 Recorder Official organ of the Melbourne Branch of the Australian Society for the Study of Labour History Issue No 263—October 2009 IN THIS EDITION: • Working Class ANZAC Heroes, Paddy Garriy, p. 1 • Barney Cooney, Senator for Victoria 1984‐2002, Rennis Witham, p. 6 • JOHN CUMMINS MEMORIAL FUND, Peter Love p. 2 • Congratulaons to Gwen Goedecke, p. 6 • ‘J.P.M.’ – John Peter Maynes (Part 2), Keith Harvey, p. 3 • Melbourne branch notes and contacts, p. 7 • Noceboard, p. 8 Working Class ANZAC Heroes By Paddy Garriy On the second day of November in 1923, 636 members police officer that fired the fatal bullet has never been of the Victorian Police force went on strike. All were revealed. sacked and replaced by volunteer strikebreakers. The 1928 dispute was very similar to polical aacks on Five years to the day, on the second of November in waterfront unionists in 1998, when ship‐owners, the 1928, and during a marime industrial dispute, some of Federal Government, Arbitraon Court, and State police, the same police strikebreakers were amongst armed again acted in collusion to lock out workers belonging to police protecng waterfront strikebreakers at Princes unions from their workplace. During the 1928 lockout, Pier. On this day the police shot and wounded four the media was very dishonest and totally in the pockets waterside workers. One of them, Allan Whiaker died of ship‐owners and the establishment. This media three months later. constantly praised the ‘free volunteer labour’ and heavily cricised the locked out and starving Despite requests from many concerned union workers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Karnataka Legislature (Members Medical Attendance) Rules, 1968
    THE KARNATAKA LEGISLATURE (MEMBERS MEDICAL ATTENDANCE) RULES, 1968 (As amended up to 1st Sept. 1997) In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 15 of the Karnataka Legislature Salaries Act, 1956 (Mysore Act 2 of the 1957), the Government of Karnataka hereby makes the following rules, namely:- 1. Title and Commencement:- (1) These rules may be called the Karnataka Legislature (Members medical Attendance) Rules, 1968. (2) They shall be deemed to have come into force on the tenth day of August 1967. 2. Definitions:- In these rules, unless the context otherwise requires, (a) "authorised medical attendant" means (i) in the case of Members residing in places where there are Government Hospitals or Dispensaries, the Medical Officers, whether Gazetted or Non-Gazetted, incharge of such Hospitals or Dispensaries. (ii) in the case of Members residing in places where there are no Government Hospitals or Dispensaries, the Medical Officers, whether Gazetted or Non- Gazetted, in charge of local fund dispensaries, health units or health centres, at such places; (iii) In the case of Members suffering from Tuberculosis and receiving treatment at the Karnataka Health Institute, Ghataprabha, the Chief Medical Officer of the said Institute); Provided that honorary Specialists, honorary Medical Officers part-time specialists and part-time Medical Officers shall not be deemed to be authorised Medical Attendants. b) "Controlling Officer" for the purpose of claims for reimbursement of expenditure incurred in connection with Medical Attendance,
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Joint Select Committee On
    The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia Report of the Joint Select Committee on Corporations Legislation April 1989 The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia Report of the Joint Select Committee on Corporations Legislation April 1989 Australian Government Publishing Service Canberra © Commonwealth of Australia 1989 ISBN 0 644 09620 9 Printed by Pirie Printers Sales Pty Ltd, Fyshwick, A.C.T. 2609 MEMBERSHIP OF THE COMMITTEE Mr Ron Edwards, Chairman, Member for Stirling Senator Jim Short, Deputy Chairman, (Victoria) Senate House of Representatives Senator Richard Alston Mr Peter Fisher, MP (Victoria) (Mallee, Victoria) Senator Barney Cooney Mr Duncan Kerr, MP (Victoria) (Denison, Tasmania) Senator Michael Macklin Mr Ted Lindsay, MP (Queensland) (Herbert, Queensland) Senator Bob McMullan Mr Warwick Smith, MP (Australian Capital Territory) (Bass, Tasmania) Secretary Andrew Snedden The Senate Parliament House Canberra iii CONTENTS Para Page TERMS OF REFERENCE PREFACE Terms of Reference ix Committee's approach to the Reference and x Inquiry Evidence and Submissions xii Style and format of the Report xiii Acknowledgements xv RECOMMENDATIONS THE PROPOSED NEW SCHEME FOR REGULATION OF COMPANIES AND SECURITIES CHAPTER 1: REGULATION OF COMPANIES AND SECURITIES: A NEW SCHEME Introduction 1.1 1 A new scheme: reasons for and against 1.10 3 A compromise scheme 1.19 6 CHAPTER 2: TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS Requirements for transitional provisions 2.1 9 Proposed transitional provisions 2.5 10 PART 2 - THE AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES COMMISSION CHAPTER
    [Show full text]
  • (Prevention of Disqualification) Act, 1956
    THE KARNATAKA LEGISLATURE (PREVENTION OF DISQUALIFICATION) ACT, 1956. ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. Sections : 1. Short Title. 2. Definitions. 3. Removal of certain disqualifications. * * * * STATEMENT OF OBJECTS AND REASONS I Act 4 of 1957.- Consequent on the taking over of life insurance business by the Government of India, any member of the State Legislature holding an office of profit in any of the Insurance Companies whose life insurance business has been taken over, will incur disqualifications from membership of the State Legislature. The disqualification in respect of members of Parliament holding similar offices of profit has been removed by section 15 of the Insurance (Emergency Provisions) Act, 1956 (Central Act 9 of 1956), and the Government of India have drawn attention of the State Government to this provision and have suggested consideration of enactment of similar law to cover cases of members of the State legislature. It is considered necessary to enact a similar law in the State. Hence the Bill. (Published in the Mysore Gazette (Extraordinary) dated 18-9-1956 at page 2) II Amending Act 35 of 1962.- At present the Home Guards Organisation is in existence only in the Bombay-Karnataka Districts of the State. In view of the present emergency it is considered necessary to have a voluntary body of person throughout the State to discharge duties in relation to the protection of persons, the security of property and preservation of public order in emergency. Hence, it is proposed to organise Home Guards in the entire State. In order to effectively control and administer the Organisation it is necessary to have a uniform law.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPREME COURT of INDIA Page 1 of 7 CASE NO.: Appeal (Civil) 3633 of 2001
    http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 7 CASE NO.: Appeal (civil) 3633 of 2001 PETITIONER: M.V. RAJASHEKARAN & ORS. Vs. RESPONDENT: VATAL NAGARAJ & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/01/2002 BENCH: G.B. Pattanaik & R.P. Sethi JUDGMENT: WithCivil Appeal No.3714 of 2001 and Civil Appeal No.3844 of 2001 JUDGMENT PATTANAIK, J. These three appeals are directed against one and the same Judgment of the Karnataka High Court. An Election Petition was filed under Section 81 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, challenging the election of the present appellants as Members of the Karnataka Legislative Council and for declaring the said election as null and void inter alia on the ground that the nomination of Vatal Nagaraj, respondent No. 1 had been improperly rejected. Said Vatal Nagaraj was an ex M.L.A. and had been appointed as a One Man Commission by the Government of Karnataka by Order dated 18.4.2000 to study the problems of the Kannadigas in the Border areas of Kerala, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Goa and Tamil Nadu. By a subsequent order, the Chairman of the Commission was accorded the status of a Minister of Cabinet rank and thereafter by a Government Order dated 24.5.2000, for defraying the expenses of pay and day to day expenditure of the Chairman of the Commission, a sum of Rs. 5 lacs was provided in the Budget estimate for the year 2000-2001. When election to the Karnataka Legislative Council was held for filling up 11 vacancies and said Vatal Nagaraj filed his nomination paper, on an objection being filed for accepting the nomination, the Returning Officer took up the scrutiny and rejected the nomination of said Vatal Nagaraj on a finding that he was holding an office of profit and as such was disqualified from being elected.
    [Show full text]
  • Gap Congress on Regulatory Affairs
    GAP CONGRESS ON REGULATORY AFFAIRS “OPPORTUNITIES FOR BUSINESS” 25 ‐ 26 September 2008 Melbourne, Victoria GAP CONGRESS ON REGULATORY AFFAIRS “OPPORTUNITIES FOR BUSINESS” Melbourne, Australia 25 & 26 September 2008 For further information contact: Global Access Partners Pty Ltd 53 Balfour St, Chippendale, Sydney NSW Australia 2008 Phone +61 2 8383 2416 Fax +61 2 9319 5754 Website www.globalaccesspartners.org 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 4 Partners & Sponsors 5 Keynote Speakers 6 Report of the Congress Proceedings 7 The Steering Committee 27 Participating Organisations 28 Appendices: Appendix 1 – Programme 29 Appendix 2 – Speakers’ Profiles 31 Appendix 3 – Sponsors’ Profiles 37 Appendix 4 – List of Delegates 45 DISCLAIMER: This Report represents a wide range of views and interests of the participating individuals and organisations. Statements made during discussions are the personal opinions of the speakers and do not necessarily reflect those of the organisers and sponsors of the Congress. 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The GAP Congress on Regulatory Affairs, held Key points arising from the Congress included: at Parliament House of Victoria on 26 September Technological innovation and the dissolving of 2008, brought government, business and industry national boundaries in cyberspace render traditional experts together to discuss how companies can approaches to its regulation irrelevant. Despite the best adapt and respond to new regulation by problems this raises, technology offers great benefits embracing the commercial opportunities it in citizen‐centric service delivery which should not be provides. stymied by the hyping of privacy concerns not shared by the majority of citizens. The Congress, organised by Sydney‐based policy network Global Access Partners (GAP), ‘Cloud computing’ has the ability to revolutionise championed a forward thinking approach to how business computing, but requires safeguards and Australian businesses can use regulation to their incentives to promote its adoption.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Parliament House Annual Report 2011-2012
    2011 OLD PARLIAMENT HOUSE ANNUAL 2012 REPORT © Commonwealth of Australia 2012 This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior permission from Old Parliament House. ISSN: 1837-2309 Online version: This report is available for download via moadoph.gov.au/about/ corporate-documents/ Inquiries about the content of this report should be directed to: Annual Report Coordinator Old Parliament House PO Box 7088 CANBERRA BC ACT 2610 Telephone (02) 6270 8219 Facsimile (02) 6270 8235 E-mail [email protected] Typeset and published by Old Parliament House Prepared by the Human Resources and Governance Section Edited by WordsWorth Writing, Canberra Designed by Giraffe Visual Communication Management Pty Ltd Printed by New Millennium Print Cover – Old Parliament House illuminated as part of the Enlighten: see Canberra in a whole new light festival, March 2012. Photo: Stefan Postles LETTER Of TRANsmittal iii REPORT 2011-12 ANNUAL OLD PARLIAMENT HOUSE OLD PARLIAMENT iv CONTENTs REPORT 2011-12 1 D iRECTOR’s REViEW 2 2 AGENCY OVERViEW ANNUAL Role and functions 6 Organisational structure 7 Outcome and program structure 8 Governance framework 8 3 REPORT ON PERfORmANCE Performance overview 14 OLD PARLIAMENT HOUSE OLD PARLIAMENT Managing the heritage values of Old Parliament House 15 Developing and managing collections 19 Increasing engagement and participation 25 4 MANAGEmENT AND ACCOUNTABiLiTY Overview 54 Corporate governance 54 External scrutiny 60 Freedom of information
    [Show full text]
  • What Does the Saga Mean For
    165 VICTORIAN BAR NEWS BAR VICTORIAN ISSUE 165 WINTER 2019 2019 Dr Katie Pro bono VICTORIAN Victorian Greenaway awards Bar Dinner on keeping BAR secrets NEWS WHAT DOES THE BARRISTER X WINTER 2019 SAGA MEAN FOR US? 165 Plus: Where do we come from? The diverse backgrounds of our barristers. ISSUE 165 WINTER 2019 MONASH VICTORIAN LAW BAR NEWS News and Views Editorial 40 What does the ‘Barrister X’ saga Confronting the 5 mean for us? challenges before us Gain a NATALIE HICKEY WITH MATT COLLINS THE EDITORS 42 The mental health benefits Letters to the editors 7 and burdens of keeping Cultural intelligence at the Bar 8 other people’s secrets competitive ARUSHAN PILLAY AND RICHARD INGLEBY NATALIE HICKEY President’s report 10 44 A barrister’s obligations to keep MATT COLLINS 34 client information confidential CEO Report 12 ROISIN ANNESLEY, CHAIR ETHICS COMMITTEE KATHERINE LORENZ 46 Where we come from edge for your COLIN GOLVAN QC Around town 52 2019 Pro Bono Awards 14 Delusions of certitude: An interview VBN with Dr James Raymond JUSTIN WHEELAHAN 2019 Victorian Bar Dinner 18 54 Disruption and innovation in the VBN future in law. family law space Peter O’Callaghan QC 24 TALYA FAIGENBAUM & ANNETTE CHARAK Gallery extension Bar Lore SIOBHAN RYAN 56 The more things change, the more The Gallery’s new space— 25 they stay the same JACK RUSH Enrol now in 3 new tech subjects: The Hartog Berkeley QC Room 46 THE HON SUSAN KIEFEL AC, CHIEF JUSTICE Back of the Lift 60 Silence all stand Testing their mettle: 30 Legal Tech Studio Prospective arbitration 67 Vale
    [Show full text]
  • Official Hansard No
    COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES SENATE Official Hansard No. 14, 2001 MONDAY, 24 SEPTEMBER 2001 THIRTY-NINTH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION—TENTH PERIOD BY AUTHORITY OF THE SENATE INTERNET The Votes and Proceedings for the House of Representatives are available at: http://www.aph.gov.au/house/info/votes Proof and Official Hansards for the House of Representatives, the Senate and committee hearings are available at: http://www.aph.gov.au/hansard SITTING DAYS—2001 Month Date February 6, 7, 8, 26, 27, 28 March 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 26, 27, 28, 29 April 2, 3, 4, 5 May 9, 10, 22, 23, 24 June 4, 5, 6, 7, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 27, 28 August 6, 7, 8, 9, 20, 21, 22, 23, 27, 28, 29, 30 September 17, 18, 19, 20, 24, 25, 26, 27 October 22, 23, 24, 25, 29, 30, 31 November 1, 12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 22 December 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13 RADIO BROADCASTS Broadcasts of proceedings of the Parliament can be heard on the following Parliamentary and News Network radio stations, in the areas identified. CANBERRA 1440 AM SYDNEY 630 AM NEWCASTLE 1458 AM BRISBANE 936 AM MELBOURNE 1026 AM ADELAIDE 972 AM PERTH 585 AM HOBART 729 AM DARWIN 102.5 FM Monday, 24 September 2001 SENATE 27603 Monday, 24 September 2001 We cannot lose sight of the fact that refugees will ————— be amongst those people travelling to Australia without authority. The PRESIDENT (Senator the Hon. But it is critical that Migration Act powers to test Margaret Reid) took the chair at 12.30 p.m., these claims effectively match the challenge be- and read prayers.
    [Show full text]
  • D.H. Shankaramurthy's Contributions to Karnataka Politics an Overview
    International Journal of Applied Research 2018; 4(12): 327-330 ISSN Print: 2394-7500 ISSN Online: 2394-5869 D.H. Shankaramurthy’s contributions to Karnataka Impact Factor: 5.2 IJAR 2018; 4(12): 327-330 politics an overview www.allresearchjournal.com Received: 13-10-2018 Accepted: 16-11-2018 Nagaraju MS and Dr. RN Dinesh Nagaraju MS Research Student and Abstract Assistant Professor of Political The political and economic democracy would not be much developed with out the true leaders of the Science, Government First nation. That is why Plato rightly asserted that “The philosopher king must rule the kingdom”. With out Grade College, Kunigal, the rich knowledge of the ruler the nation will not be in the proper forwardness. In this article, the Tumkur District Karnataka, researcher tries to study how the leadership qualify helps to the nation development and also explain India the contribution of D H Shankar Murthy to Karnataka politics and particularly to Shimoga district. The data used for his research article for the secondary data which has been collected from the books, Dr. RN Dinesh journals, Periodicals etc. Assistant Professor of Political Science and Research Guide, Keywords: Leader, democratic governance, people’s development, parliamentary democracy, University Evening College Mysore University, Mysore, contributions, politics Karnataka, India Introduction Shimoga is one of the district of the Karnataka state, is situated roughly in the mid-south- western part of the state. It had an eventful history and has rich cultural traditions. It is bestowed with abundant natural recourses. The western area of the district consists of a mountains terrain while on the eastern side, there is a striking transition from malnad and semi malnad to maidan.
    [Show full text]