Salt River Project; Horseshoe-Bartlett Application: Mr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Salt River Project; Horseshoe-Bartlett Application: Mr 23488 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 84 / Wednesday, April 30, 2008 / Notices Dated: April 8, 2008. that will be implemented and discusses Pursuant to the National Wendi Weber, all factors leading to the decision. Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), this Acting Regional Director, Region 5, U.S. Fish ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to review notice advises the public that the and Wildlife Service. the final EIS and Application Service has gathered the information [FR Doc. E8–9443 Filed 4–29–08; 8:45 am] documents may obtain a copy by necessary to determine impacts and BILLING CODE 4310–55–P writing to Mr. Steve Spangle, Field formulate alternatives for the EIS, Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife related to the potential issuance of an Service, 2321 West Royal Palm Road, ITP to SRP and that SRP has developed DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Suite 103, Phoenix, AZ 85021. and is prepared to implement the HCP, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: which provides measures to minimize Fish and Wildlife Service Final EIS: Ms. Debra Bills, Arizona State and mitigate the effects of the incidental Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, take of federally listed species to the [FWS–R2–ES–2008–N0063; 20124–1112– 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103, maximum extent practicable, pursuant 0000–F2] Phoenix, AZ 85021; 602/242–0210. to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA. Section 9 of the ESA prohibits the Salt River Project; Horseshoe-Bartlett Application: Mr. Charles Paradzick, Senior Ecologist, Salt River Project, P.O. ‘‘taking’’ of threatened and endangered Habitat Conservation Plan, Maricopa species. However, the Service, under and Yavapai Counties, AZ Box 52025, PAB352, Phoenix, AZ 85072–2025; 602/236–2724, or Mr. Craig limited circumstances, may issue AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Sommers, President, ERO Resources permits to take threatened or Interior. Corporation, 1842 Clarkson Street, endangered wildlife species when such taking is incidental to, and not the ACTION: Notice of availability: final Denver, CO 80218; 303/830–1188. purpose of, otherwise lawful activities. environmental impact statement, final Read-only downloadable copies of the Regulations governing permits for habitat conservation plan, and proposed final EIS and Application documents endangered species are at 50 CFR Parts implementing agreement for incidental are available on the Internet at http:// www.fws.gov/southwest/es/arizona. A 13 and 17. take. Copies of the final EIS and printed or CD copy of the documents is Application are available for public SUMMARY: The Salt River Project (SRP) available upon request from Mr. Charles inspection and review at the following has submitted an application for an Paradzick, Salt River Project, P.O. Box locations (by appointment only at incidental take permit (ITP) for species 52025, Phoenix, AZ 85072–2025; (602) government offices): currently listed under the Endangered 236–2724; • Department of the Interior, Natural Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA) [email protected]. Copies Resources Library, 1849 C St., NW., and species that may become listed in of the final EIS and Application are also Washington, DC 20240. the future (collectively, ‘‘covered available for public inspection and • species’’). The proposed take would U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 110 review at the locations listed below S. Church, Suite 3450, Tucson, AZ occur in Maricopa and Yavapai under Supplementary Information. Counties, Arizona, as a result of impacts 85701. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SRP has • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, on covered species and occupied habitat submitted an application for an ITP for 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103, from modified operation of Horseshoe the following covered species: Phoenix, AZ 85021. Dam and Reservoir (Horseshoe) and (1) Southwestern willow flycatcher • Salt River Project, 1521 Project Bartlett Dam and Reservoir (Bartlett). (Empidonax traillii extimus) Drive, Tempe, AZ 85281. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (flycatcher); • Flagstaff Public Library, 300 W. (Service) has issued a final (2) Bald eagle (Haliaeetus Aspen Ave., Flagstaff, AZ 86001. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) leucocephalus); • Government Document Service, to evaluate the impacts of and (3) Yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ alternatives for the possible issuance of americanus)(cuckoo); 85287. an ITP. SRP has completed the final (4) Razorback sucker (Xyrauchen • Phoenix Public Library (Burton Barr Horseshoe-Bartlett Habitat Conservation texanus); Central), 1221 N. Central Ave., Phoenix, Plan (HCP), along with a proposed (5) Colorado pikeminnow AZ 85004. Implementing Agreement as part of the (Ptychocheilus lucius); • Cottonwood Public Library, 100 S. application package submitted to the (6) Gila topminnow (Poeciliopsis o. 6th St., Cottonwood, AZ 86326. Service (collectively, the ‘‘Application’’) occidentalis); • Camp Verde Public Library, 130 as required by the ESA, for (7) Spikedace (Meda fulgida); Black Bridge Loop Rd., Camp Verde, AZ consideration of issuance of an ITP. The (8) Loach minnow (Tiaroga cobitis); 86322. Application provides measures to (9) Roundtail chub (Gila robusta); • Fountain Hills Library, 12901 N. La minimize and mitigate the effects of the (10) Longfin dace (Agosia Montana Dr., Fountain Hills, AZ 85268. proposed taking of covered species and chrysogaster); Background effects to the habitats upon which they (11) Sonora sucker (Catostomus depend. insignis); Horseshoe and Bartlett are operated The final EIS includes all comments (12) Desert sucker (Catostomus by SRP in conjunction with four received on the draft EIS, and responses clarki); reservoirs on the Salt River and one to those comments. No decision will be (13) Speckled dace (Rhinichthys reservoir on East Clear Creek as integral made on the proposed action until at osculus); features of the Salt River Federal least 30 days after publication of this (14) Lowland leopard frog (Rana Reclamation Project, authorized by the notice of availability of the final EIS in yavapaiensis); Reclamation Act of 1902, and under a the Federal Register. After the 30-day (15) Northern Mexican gartersnake 1917 contract with the United States (43 waiting period, the U.S. Fish and (Thamnophis eques megalops); U.S.C. 499). Since completion in the Wildlife Service will complete a Record (16) Narrow-headed gartersnake 1930s and 1940s, Horseshoe and Bartlett of Decision (ROD) that states the action (Thamnophis rufipunctatus). have provided water for irrigation, VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:09 Apr 29, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30APN1.SGM 30APN1 rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 84 / Wednesday, April 30, 2008 / Notices 23489 municipal, and other uses. Currently, Horseshoe water levels to minimize ADDRESSES: Written comments should SRP reservoirs supply much of the impacts to covered native fish, frog, and be sent directly to the Desk Officer for water for the population of more than gartersnake species. The HCP also the Department of the Interior, by 2.6 million people in the cities of includes other measures to minimize facsimile at (202) 395–6566 or you may Phoenix, Mesa, Chandler, Tempe, and mitigate incidental take of the send an e-mail to: Glendale, Gilbert, Scottsdale, Tolleson, covered species to the maximum extent [email protected]. Send a and Avondale. Water deliveries are also practicable, and which ensure that the copy of your comments to Daisy West, made under specific water rights in incidental take will not appreciably Chief, Division of Tribal Government Horseshoe and Bartlett held by the City reduce the likelihood of the survival Services, Office of Indian Services, of Phoenix, the Salt River Pima- and recovery of these species in the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Department of Maricopa Indian Community, and the wild. the Interior, 1849 C Street, NW., Mail Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation. In Stop 4513–MIB, Washington, DC 20240; Alternatives addition, water is provided to irrigate telephone (202) 513–7641. agricultural lands within SRP and for Two other alternatives being FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: satisfaction of the independent water considered by the Service include the Elizabeth Colliflower, (202) 513–7627. rights of Buckeye Irrigation Company, following: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Gila River Indian Community, Roosevelt A 60-day 1. No Permit—No issuance of an ITP notice for public comments was Irrigation District, Roosevelt Water by the Service. This alternative would Conservation District, and others. published in the Federal Register on require SRP to do everything within its January 29, 2008. No comments were Horseshoe, Bartlett, and the other SRP control to avoid any take of federally reservoirs also provide a variety of received on the workload burden or the listed species associated with its form itself (OMB Control No. 1076– recreational uses and environmental continued operation of Horseshoe and benefits in central Arizona. 0160) during this public comment Bartlett. period. Due to dry conditions in central 2. Modified Historical Operation— Arizona for the past 12 years, water Approval by the Service of an I. Abstract levels in Horseshoe and Bartlett have application for an ITP authorizing been below normal. As a result, riparian The purpose of the Indian Preference incidental take of threatened and Form is to encourage qualified Indians trees and shrubs have grown in the endangered species associated with the Horseshoe storage space and have been to seek employment
Recommended publications
  • Phase I Environmental Assessment, East Clear Creek, Coconino County
    PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EAST CLEAR CREEK, COCONINO COUNTY, ARIZONA Resolution Copper Prepared for: Attn: Mary Morissette 102 Magma Heights Superior, Arizona 85173-2523 Project Number: 807.211 September 4, 2020 Date WestLand Resources, Inc. 4001 E. Paradise Falls Drive Tucson, Arizona 85712 5202069585 East Clear Creek, Coconino County, Arizona Phase 1 Environmental Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................................... ES-1 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Purpose ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Scope of Services .............................................................................................................................. 2 1.3. Limitations and Exceptions ............................................................................................................ 2 1.4. Special Terms and Conditions ........................................................................................................ 3 1.5. User Reliance ..................................................................................................................................... 3 1.6. Continued Viability ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 5-Yr Review LEVI
    Little Colorado Spinedace (Lepidomeda vittata) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Photo by Arizona Game and Fish Department U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arizona Ecological Services Office Phoenix, Arizona 5-YEAR REVIEW Little Colorado Spinedace/Lepidomeda vittata 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1 Reviewers Lead Regional Office: Southwest (Region 2), Wendy Brown, Endangered Species Recovery Coordinator, (505) 248-6664; Brady McGee, Endangered Species Recovery Biologist, (505) 248-6657. Lead Field Office: Arizona Ecological Services Office, Shaula Hedwall, Senior Fish and Wildlife Biologist, (928) 226-0614 x103; Steven L. Spangle, Field Supervisor, (602) 242-0210 x244. Cooperating Field Office: Arizona Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office, Stewart Jacks, Project Leader, (928) 338-4288 x20. 1.2 Methodology used to complete the review: This review was conducted by Arizona Ecological Services Office (AESO) staff using information from species survey and monitoring reports, the 1998 Little Colorado River Spinedace (Lepidomeda vittata) Recovery Plan (Recovery Plan) (USFWS 1998), peer-reviewed journal articles, and documents generated as part of section 7 and section 10 consultations. We discussed potential recommendations to assist in recovery of the species with recognized spinedace experts. 1.3 Background: 1.3.1 FR Notice citation announcing initiation of this review: The FR notice initiating this review was published on January 11, 2006 (71 FR 1765). This notice opened a 90-day request for information period, which closed on April 11, 2006. We received comments from the Arizona Game and Fish Department (AGFD) and from Mr. Jim Crosswhite, owner of the EC Bar Ranch on Nutrioso Creek. 1 1.3.2 Listing history Original Listing FR notice: 32 FR 2001 (USFWS 1967) Date listed: March 11, 1967 Entity listed: Species, Lepidomeda vittata Classification: Threatened.
    [Show full text]
  • Roundtail Chub Repatriated to the Blue River
    Volume 1 | Issue 2 | Summer 2015 Roundtail Chub Repatriated to the Blue River Inside this issue: With a fish exclusion barrier in place and a marked decline of catfish, the time was #TRENDINGNOW ................. 2 right for stocking Roundtail Chub into a remote eastern Arizona stream. New Initiative Launched for Southwest Native Trout.......... 2 On April 30, 2015, the Reclamation, and Marsh and Blue River. A total of 222 AZ 6-Species Conservation Department stocked 876 Associates LLC embarked on a Roundtail Chub were Agreement Renewal .............. 2 juvenile Roundtail Chub from mission to find, collect and stocked into the Blue River. IN THE FIELD ........................ 3 ARCC into the Blue River near bring into captivity some During annual monitoring, Recent and Upcoming AZGFD- the Juan Miller Crossing. Roundtail Chub for captive led Activities ........................... 3 five months later, Additional augmentation propagation from the nearest- Department staff captured Spikedace Stocked into Spring stockings to enhance the genetic neighbor population in Eagle Creek ..................................... 3 42 of the stocked chub, representation of the Blue River Creek. The Aquatic Research some of which had travelled BACK AT THE PONDS .......... 4 Roundtail Chub will be and Conservation Center as far as seven miles Native Fish Identification performed later this year. (ARCC) held and raised the upstream from the stocking Workshop at ARCC................ 4 offspring of those chub for Stockings will continue for the location. future stocking into the Blue next several years until that River. population is established in the Department biologists conducted annual Blue River and genetically In 2012, the partners delivered monitoring in subsequent mimics the wild source captive-raised juvenile years, capturing three chub population.
    [Show full text]
  • Oak Flat Acres – 2,422
    Location – Pinal County, east of Superior Oak Flat Acres – 2,422 The Oak Flat parcel and surrounding lands include approximately 2,422 acres of Tonto National Forest lands intermingled with private lands owned by Resolution Copper. Unpatented mining claims staked as early as 1917 cover this suitable nesting place for birds of prey, and bats may inhabit parcel except for 760 acres that were withdrawn from mineral some of the historic mine shafts existing in the area. Protection entry through executive order during the Eisenhower of these important features is part of the planning process for Administration. These 2,422 acres of federal land, which include the Resolution Copper mine. Specific language in the bill calls the withdrawal area, would be traded to Resolution Copper in the for a management plan and significant limitations on surface land exchange for more than 5,000 acres of high-value uses within the easement area. This includes appropriate conservation lands owned by the company in various Arizona levels of non-motorized public access and use and other locations. measures to protect the open space and conservation values of Apache Leap. When the ownership of this parcel transfers to Resolution Copper, access to some Oak Flat recreational sites will be limited or lost. • To protect public safety, rock climbing and bouldering activities This will include 16 campsites that are located on about 50 acres ultimately will need to be relocated. Resolution Copper is of the forest service parcel as well as portions of the parcel that working with interested stakeholders, including members of the are used for climbing and bouldering.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix / Attachment 1A
    ATTACHMENT 1A (Supplemental Documentation to the: Mogollon Rim Water Resource, Management Study Report of Findings) Geology and Structural Controls of Groundwater, Mogollon Rim Water Resources Management Study by Gaeaorama, Inc., July, 2006 GEOLOGY AND STRUCTURAL CONTROLS OF GROUNDWATER, MOGOLLON RIM WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT STUDY Prepared for the Bureau of Reclamation GÆAORAMA, INC. Blanding, Utah DRAFT FOR REVIEW 22 July 2006 CONTENTS page Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………….. 1 MRWRMS ii 1/18/11 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………... 2 GIS database……………………………………………………………………………………. 5 Faults and fault systems………………………………………………………………………… 6 Proterozoic faults…………………………………………………………………………… 6 Re-activated Proterozoic faults……………………………………………………………... 6 Post-Paleozoic faults of likely Proterozoic inheritance…………………………………….. 7 Tertiary fault systems……………………………………………………………………….. 8 Verde graben system……………………………………………………………………. 8 East- to northeast-trending system……………………………………………………… 9 North-trending system…………………………………………………………………...9 Regional disposition of Paleozoic strata………………………………………………………. 10 Mogollon Rim Formation – distribution and implications……………………………………..10 Relation of springs to faults…………………………………………………………………… 11 Fossil Springs……………………………………………………………………………… 13 Tonto Bridge Spring………………………………………………………………………..14 Webber Spring and Flowing Spring………………………………………………………..15 Cold Spring………………………………………………………………………………... 16 Fossil Canyon-Strawberry-Pine area…………………………………………………………...17 Speculations on aquifer systems……………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Assessment Units
    APPENDIX A ASSESSMENT UNITS SURFACE WATER REACH DESCRIPTION REACH/LAKE NUM WATERSHED Agua Fria River 341853.9 / 1120358.6 - 341804.8 / 15070102-023 Middle Gila 1120319.2 Agua Fria River State Route 169 - Yarber Wash 15070102-031B Middle Gila Alamo 15030204-0040A Bill Williams Alum Gulch Headwaters - 312820/1104351 15050301-561A Santa Cruz Alum Gulch 312820 / 1104351 - 312917 / 1104425 15050301-561B Santa Cruz Alum Gulch 312917 / 1104425 - Sonoita Creek 15050301-561C Santa Cruz Alvord Park Lake 15060106B-0050 Middle Gila American Gulch Headwaters - No. Gila Co. WWTP 15060203-448A Verde River American Gulch No. Gila County WWTP - East Verde River 15060203-448B Verde River Apache Lake 15060106A-0070 Salt River Aravaipa Creek Aravaipa Cyn Wilderness - San Pedro River 15050203-004C San Pedro Aravaipa Creek Stowe Gulch - end Aravaipa C 15050203-004B San Pedro Arivaca Cienega 15050304-0001 Santa Cruz Arivaca Creek Headwaters - Puertocito/Alta Wash 15050304-008 Santa Cruz Arivaca Lake 15050304-0080 Santa Cruz Arnett Creek Headwaters - Queen Creek 15050100-1818 Middle Gila Arrastra Creek Headwaters - Turkey Creek 15070102-848 Middle Gila Ashurst Lake 15020015-0090 Little Colorado Aspen Creek Headwaters - Granite Creek 15060202-769 Verde River Babbit Spring Wash Headwaters - Upper Lake Mary 15020015-210 Little Colorado Babocomari River Banning Creek - San Pedro River 15050202-004 San Pedro Bannon Creek Headwaters - Granite Creek 15060202-774 Verde River Barbershop Canyon Creek Headwaters - East Clear Creek 15020008-537 Little Colorado Bartlett Lake 15060203-0110 Verde River Bear Canyon Lake 15020008-0130 Little Colorado Bear Creek Headwaters - Turkey Creek 15070102-046 Middle Gila Bear Wallow Creek N. and S. Forks Bear Wallow - Indian Res.
    [Show full text]
  • ECOLOGICAL OVERVIEW EAST CLEAR CREEK PARCEL COCONINO COUNTY, ARIZONA Resolution Copper
    ECOLOGICAL OVERVIEW EAST CLEAR CREEK PARCEL COCONINO COUNTY, ARIZONA Resolution Copper Prepared for: 102 Magma Heights – Superior, Arizona 85173 Project Number: 807.98 13 06 January 2017 WestLand Resources, Inc. 4001 E. Paradise Falls Drive Tucson, Arizona 85712 5202069585 East Clear Creek Parcel - Coconino County, Arizona Ecological Overview TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................................... ES-1 1. INTRODUCTION AND METHODS ................................................................................................ 1 1.1. Purpose and Organization of Report ............................................................................................ 1 1.2. Methods and Approach ................................................................................................................... 1 2. REGIONAL SETTING .......................................................................................................................... 3 3. PROPERTY AND ADJACENT LAND USES .................................................................................. 5 4. PHYSICAL RESOURCES ...................................................................................................................... 7 4.1. Landform and Topography ............................................................................................................. 7 4.2. Geology and Geomorphology .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior U.S
    United States Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 Phoenix, Arizona 85021-4951 Telephone: (602) 242-0210 FAX: (602) 242-2513 In Reply Refer To: AESO/SE 22410-2007-F-0197-R001 April 23, 2012 Mr. M. Earl Stewart Forest Supervisor Coconino National Forest 1824 South Thompson Street Flagstaff, Arizona 86001-2529 RE: Revised Biological Opinion for the Chiricahua leopard frog on the Fossil Creek Range Allotment Dear Mr. Stewart: Thank you for your request to reinitiate formal consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531- 1544), as amended (ESA or Act). Your request was dated February 9, 2012, and received by us on February 13, 2012. This consultation concerns the possible effects of livestock grazing and management activities on the Fossil Creek Range Allotment (FCRA) located on the Red Rock Ranger District in Yavapai County, Arizona. The Forest Service has determined that the proposed action may affect the threatened Chiricahua leopard frog (Lithobates {=Rana} chiricahuensis) and its designated critical habitat. In January 2012, the U.S. District Court of Arizona (No. CV 10-330 TUC AWT) found that our February 26, 2010, Final Biological Opinion on the Fossil Creek Allotment Plan (USFWS 2010, consultation number 22410-2007-F-0197) and accompanying incidental take statement did not satisfy the requirements of the ESA in analyzing effects on the Chiricahua leopard frog. The other species’ effects analyses and determinations, as described in the 2010 biological opinion, continue to be valid and we are not revisiting those determinations in this document.
    [Show full text]
  • SRP Reservoir and Watershed Status Update
    SRP Reservoir and Watershed Status Update Andrew Volkmer, P.E. Hydrologist SRP Surface Water Resources Andrew Volkmer, P.E. • Hydrologist, Surface Water Resources at Salt River Project • B.S. Agricultural Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln • M.S. Agricultural and Biological Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska- Lincoln • Registered Professional Civil Engineer in State of Arizona 2 Overview • SRP Overview • Reservoir status • Watershed conditions • Precipitation • Snowpack • Runoff • Weather Outlook • Runoff Outlook 3 Salt River Project Structure • Salt River Valley Water Users Association • Established in 1903 • Private Corporation • One of the first reclamation projects under the Reclamation Act of 1902 • Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District • Established in 1937 • Political Subdivision of the State of Arizona • Allowed for the growth of power generation and service 4 Salt River Valley Water Users Association 5 KEY MAP Williams Flagstaff E. Clear Creek Watershed Sedona Verde River Watershed SRVWUA Salt River EAST CLEAR CREEK Watershed WATERSHED Prescott Camp SALT RIVER Verde WATERSHED VERDE RIVER Show Low WATERSHED Payson Alpine Agua Agua Fria SRV Phoenix Globe WUA SRP Watersheds 6 SRP Reservoir Systems East Clear Salt River Creek Dam Dams Verde River Dams Roosevelt C.C. Cragin Dam Horseshoe Dam (1911, 1996) Dam (1965) (1951) Horse Mesa Dam (1927) Bartlett Dam Stewart Mt Dam (1939, 1997) (1930, 1992) Mormon Flat Dam (1925) 7 SRP Reservoir System Capacity in Acre-Feet VERDE TOTAL SALT TOTAL Horseshoe SRP STORAGE: SRP STORAGE: Dam 287,403 AF 2,004,287 AF 2026’ Roosevelt Horseshoe Dam Horse Mesa 2218’ 109,217 AF Bartlett Dam 2151’ Dam 1914’ 1798’ Apache Lake Bartlett Mormon Flat 245,138 AF Roosevelt Lake 178,186 AF Dam 1,631,532 AF 1660.5’ Stewart EAST CLEAR CREEK Mountain Canyon Lake TOTAL Dam 57,852 AF SRP STORAGE: 1529’ 15,000 AF C.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Roundtail Chub (Gila Robusta) Status Survey of the Lower Colorado River Basin
    ROUNDTAIL CHUB (GILA ROBUSTA) STATUS SURVEY OF THE LOWER COLORADO RIVER BASIN Jeremy B. Voeltz, Wildlife Technician Nongame Branch, Wildlife Management Division Final Report to The Central Arizona Project Native Fish Conservation and Nonnative Aquatic Species Management and Control Program U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Field Office Phoenix, Arizona and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Phoenix Area Office Phoenix, Arizona Technical Report 186 Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program Program Manager: Terry B. Johnson Arizona Game and Fish Department 2221 West Greenway Road Phoenix, Arizona 85023-4399 January 2002 CIVIL RIGHTS AND DIVERSITY COMPLIANCE The Arizona Game and Fish Commission receives federal financial assistance in Sport Fish and Wildlife Restoration. Under Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, or disability. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information please write to: Arizona Game and Fish Department Office of the Deputy Director, DOHQ 2221 West Greenway Road Phoenix, Arizona 85023-4399 and The Office for Diversity and Civil Rights U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4040 North Fairfax Drive, Room 300 Arlington, Virginia 22203 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT COMPLIANCE The Arizona Game and Fish Department complies with all provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Eligibility Report for the National Wild and Scenic River System
    United States Department of Agriculture Eligibility Report for Forest Service Southwestern the National Wild and Region May 2009 Scenic River System Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326- W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Printed on recycled paper – May 2009 Eligibility Report for the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System Compiled By: Evelyn Treiman, Recreation Planner Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests 30 S Chiricahua Street PO Box 650 Springerville, AZ 85938 Approved By: Chris Knopp Forest Supervisor June 2009 This page intentionally left blank. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Background ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Assessment Units
    APPENDIX A ASSESSMENT UNITS SURFACE WATER REACH DESCRIPTION REACH/LAKE NUM WATERSHED A Ackers East Headwaters - Ackers West 15060202-3313 Verde River Ackers West Headwaters - Granite Creek 15060202-3333 Verde River Agua Fria River Sycamore Creek - Bishop Creek 15070102-023 Middle Gila Agua Fria River State Route 169 - Yarber Wash 15070102-031B Middle Gila Alamo Lake 15030204-0040A Bill Williams Alder Creek Headwaters - Verde River 15060203-910 Verde River Alum Gulch Headwaters - 312820 / 1104351 15050301-561A Santa Cruz Alum Gulch 312820 / 1104351 - 312917 / 1104425 15050301-561B Santa Cruz Alum Gulch 312917 / 1104425 - Sonoita Creek 15050301-561C Santa Cruz Alvord Park Lake 15060106B-0050 Middle Gila American Gulch Headwaters - No. Gila Co. WWTP 15060203-448A Verde River American Gulch No. Gila County WWTP - East Verde River 15060203-448B Verde River Arnett Creek Headwaters - Queen Creek 15050100-1818 Middle Gila Apache Lake 15060106A-0070 Salt River Aravaipa Creek Aravaipa Cyn Wilderness - San Pedro River 15050203-004C San Pedro Aravaipa Creek Stowe Gulch - Aravaipa Wild. Bndry 15050203-004B San Pedro Arivaca Lake 15050304-0080 Santa Cruz Arizona Canal (15070102) HUC boundary 15070102 - Gila River 15070102-202 Middle Gila Aspen Creek Headwaters - Granite Creek 15060202-769 Verde River B Bannon Creek Headwaters - Granite Creek 15060202-774 Verde River Barbershop Canyon Creek Headwaters - East Clear Creek 15020008-537 Little Colorado Bartlett Lake 15060203-0110 Verde River Bass Canyon Tributary at 322606 / 110131 15050203-899B San Pedro
    [Show full text]