DOCSLIB.ORG

Finch-1990-Con-House Wrens and Tree Swallows-1.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Finch-1990-Con-House Wrens and Tree Swallows-1.Pdf The Condor92674487 Q The CooperOrnithological Society 1990 EFFECTS OF PREDATION AND COMPETITOR INTERFERENCE ON NESTING SUCCESS OF HOUSE WRENS AND TREE SWALLOWS DEBORAH M. FINCH ’ Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, 222 South 22nd Street, Laramie, WY 82070 Abstract. I examined the relationships among brood survival in House Wrens (Trog- lodytesaedon) and Tree Swallows (Tachycinetabicolor) and rates of nest-box use, species interference, and nest predation. Tree Swallows nested in boxes in one of three woodlands occupied by House Wrens. Over a 4-year period, clutch mortality rates in swallows were significantly higher than those in wrens, but wrens on swallow-free plots had lower failure rates than wrens that coexisted with swallows. Though conspecificsinterfered at 9 of 99 (9%) wren nests, predation was the major causeof wren nest failure, accountingfor 70% of 27 unsuccessfulattempts. Increasednest failure in wrens was associatedwith increasedrates of box use. In contrast, clutch mortality in Tree Swallows was related to nest interference by wrens. Of 29 swallow nests, 13 (45%) showed signs of interference by wrens, and eight of these 13 (62%) were initiated in boxes containing empty “dummy” nests built earlier by wrens. HouseWrens are interferencecompetitors because they exclude swallows from boxes by destroyingswallow nests. Destroying nests of otherspecies has advantages for wrensif high concentrationsof empty nests,including dummy nests,inhibits searchefficiency of predators.An experimentalapproach is recommendedfor testingthe hypothesisthat House Wrens build dummy nestsand destroyheterospecific nests because empty nestsdeceive predators. Key words: Interferencecompetition; clutch mortality; nestpredation; box-use rate; dum- my nest;riparian woodlands;House Wren; Troglodytesaedon; Tree Swallow; Tachycineta bicolor. INTRODUCTION populations (Stutchbury and Robertson 1987a), The availability of nest holes may limit abun- brood parasitism and egg dumping (Lombard0 dances of secondary cavity-nesting birds (Von 1988, Picman and Belles-Isles 1988, Price et al. Haartman 1957; Holroyd 1975; Gustafsson 1988; 1989) bigamy and extra-pair copulations (Quin- Brawn and Balda 1987,1988). House Wrens and ney 1983, Johnson and Kermott 1989) infan- Tree Swallowsare secondarycavity-nesters whose ticide (Belles-Isles and Picman 1986b, Robert- abundances often increase after introduction of son and Stutchbury 1988) and killing of adult nest boxes (Low 1933, Drilling and Thompson conspecifics (Lombard0 1986, Belles-Isles and 1984, Yahner 1983/1984). Male House Wrens Picman 1987). build dummy nests and defend multiple cavities Under conditions of nest-site limitation, the within their territory boundaries (Kendeigh 194 1, consequencesof interspecificcompetition for nest Belles-Isles and Picman 1986a), thereby limiting boxes and natural tree holes may overshadow breeding opportunities for other nesting pairs. In the effectsof intraspecific competition (Van Bal- Tree Swallows, territorial defense in the form of en et al. 1982, Gustafsson 1988, Ingold 1989) aggressiveattacks can prevent conspecificsfrom resulting in reduced reproductive successof the breeding even when unoccupied boxes are pres- subordinate competitor (Gustafsson 1987, In- ent (Harris 1979, Robertson and Gibbs 1982). gold 1989). In House Wrens, both sexespuncture Intraspecific competition for nest sitesand mates eggs and destroy nests of open-nesting birds in these speciescan apparently lead to nest usur- (Belles-Isles and Picman 1986b) and other cav- pation (Leffelaar and Robertson 1985) floating ity-nesting species(Gardner 1925, Sherman 1925, Kendeigh 1941). Belles-Islesand Picman (1986b) speculatedthat interspecificcompetition for food I Received 27 November 1989. Final acceptance12 or nest sites may explain nest-destroying behav- April 1990. ior by House Wrens. If House Wrens dominate NESTING SUCCESS OF HOUSE WRENS AND TREE SWALLOWS 675 interactions, then interference competition by ability in nesting productivity and focusing on wrens may result in lowered reproductive success correlative relationships among the residuals of in other species.Yet, no studies have compared rates of box use, interference, and nesting failure. reproductive successin House Wrens to success To determine if availability and frequency of use in hole-nesting speciesexposed to wren interfer- of nest boxes influenced rates of nest destruction ence. Unfortunately, effectsof predation on nest and competition, I used the ratio of used to total distribution and brood survival can mask or be nest boxesas an index. If the number of potential mistaken for results of competition (Nillson sites that remain unused or empty is as infor- 1984). To determine if interspecific competition mative to search-strategypredators or compet- is assymetrical, interference effectsmust first be itors as the number of used sites(e.g., Watts 1987, isolated from nesting lossescaused by factorslike Martin and Roper 1988), then this ratio may be predation. a more relevant predictor of “density-depen- In the central Rocky Mountains, House Wrens dent” interactions than abundances of birds or and Tree Swallowsfrequently co-occur in foothill nests. riparian woodlands (Finch 1989a); House Wrens numerically dominate cavity-nesting avifaunas STUDY AREA in these habitats, with population levels that are Three study plots were established in May 1982 two to three times higher than Tree Swallows in streamsidehabitats in Carbon County, south- (Finch 1987, Finch 1989b). During a study of eastern Wyoming, at elevations ranging between nest-siteselection by House Wrens (Finch 1989~) 2,050 and 2,250 m. One plot was established at I observed that swallows and wrens were syn- Rock Creek 5 km northeast of Arlington, and topic in one of three woodlands containing nest two plots, named Foote Camp and Treasure Is- boxes. Here, I postulate that temporal, spatial, land, were spaced 34 km apart along the North and interspecificdifferences in frequenciesof box Platte River near Saratoga.House Wrens nested use influence reproductive successof wrens and in boxes at all three plots, but Tree Swallows swallows through effectson probabilities of nest usedboxes at Foote Camp only. Woodlands were destruction and competitive interference. For ex- dominated by narrowleaf cottonwood (Populus ample, rates of nest predation were positively angustijblia), a variety of shrub species, espe- associated with densities of box-nesting Great cially willows (Salix spp.),and herbaceousspecies. Tits (Purus major) (Krebs 197 1, Dunn 1977) but Shortgrass prairie interspersed with sagebrush were unrelated to densities of other cavity-nest- (Artemisia tridentata) bordered riparian wood- ing species(Tompa 1967, Brawn 1987). Varia- lands. Vegetation composition of the study areas tion in the densities or spacing of box-nesters is described in greater detail in Finch (1987, may also influence competition for nest sites, 1989~). dictating rates of box intrusion (Kendeigh 194 1, Muldal et al. 1985) and subsequent nesting suc- METHODS cess. On each of the three plots, 21 to 22 nest boxes In this study, I predicted the following: (1) rates (n = 65 boxes) were mounted at heights of 2 m of nesting failure in wrens and swallows vary in on live deciduous trees > 10 cm dbh. The num- relation to probabilities of nest predation or in- ber of boxes on each plot was limited by habitat terspecificinterference, (2) spatial and temporal patch size. Boxes were spacedat intervals of 30- changes in frequencies of nest destruction and 35 m in grids conforming to the shape and size interspecific nest intrusion are associated with of the riparian corridor. Nest boxes were built differences in box availability and rates of box ofcedar 1.7 cm thick, 14 x 14 x 28 cm in outside use, (3) in areas of syntopy, House Wrens out- dimension, with latchable top doors and en- compete Tree Swallows for boxes as reflected by trances3.8 cm diameter. Boxeswere labeled with interspecific differences in rates of interference grid coordinates. Although natural cavities were and nesting success,and (4) wrens benefit by the available, spot-map checks indicated that most absence or exclusion of nesting swallows such cavity-nesters shifted to boxes after they were that wren productivity is higher in areas without erected. swallowsthan in areaswith swallows. These pre- I determined status(empty or occupied) of box dictions were addressed by first assessingand and progressof nesting attempts by checking all then controlling for spatial and temporal vari- nest boxes early in the afternoon every 24 days 616 DEBORAH M. FINCH from mid-May to early August of 1983 through Tree Swallows and House Wrens exclusively. In- 1986. Becauseof the short period of temperate terferenceby House Wrens at Tree Swallow nests weather, only a few boxes were nested in more was determined iftwigs were found in boxesafter than once in a single breeding season,either by swallowsconstructed grass nests, or if wrens were the same nesting pair, by different pairs, or by observed at swallow nests. Pierced or cracked different species.Based on observations of entry eggs, partial clutch losses, or emptied swallow by other speciesor additional conspecificsinto nests were sometimes discovered at, or follow- occupied boxes, and records of egg destruction, ing, the time of box intrusion by wrens. Inter- followed by subsequent egg laying, it appeared ference by swallows at wren nests was recorded that some “second” clutches were products of if twig nests
Load more

Recommended publications
  • House Wren Vs. House Sparrow
    NEST BOX DRAMA: HOUSE WREN VS. HOUSE SPARROW GARTH NELSON, 529 Dalhousie Crescent, Saskatoon, SK S7H 3S5 Figure 1. The disputed birdhouse and its contents, fall 1999 Garth Nelson In 1997, we were seeking a tenant for since. We did see a House Wren go in our birdhouse. We were hoping to and inspect it early last week. attract a House Wren, but ended up with a House Sparrow. And so, the following June 5,1998 : Earlier this week we saw year, I altered the “doorway” of the House Sparrows starting a nest on top birdhouse, so that only a wren would be of the birdhouse, wedged between the able to get inside. Needless to say, slanted roof of the birdhouse and the although the wrens were happy with this eaves of the garage. I took it down from renovation, the sparrows were furious. the garage and relocated it in the crab What followed was nothing less than a apple tree. Today, House Wrens were in pitched battle. and out of it with nesting material. They were singing in our yard this evening. May 24,1998 : House Sparrows are still trying to get into our birdhouse. About June 6, 1998 : Some interesting bird a week ago I put up the birdhouse under dynamics today! After breakfast, we the eaves of the garage. I had altered it noticed the male House Sparrow so that the hole is 1 inch in diameter frantically trying to get into the birdhouse instead of VA inches, hoping to keep while the House Wren fretted nearby, out the House Sparrows and attract a watching him intently.
    [Show full text]
  • House Wren Monitoring
    House Wren Intern Summary By: Jon Van Arragon Summer 2020 The Beaverhill Bird Observatory keeps record of the nesting success of House Wrens in man-made nest boxes throughout the Beaverhill Natural Area. There are 4 House Wren nest box grids labeled A-D, the boxes are arranged in a 5x5 square in grids A, C, and D; grid B is arranged in a 3x8 manner. These grids are located in mature stands of aspen and poplar forest. There are 99 House Wren boxes in total throughout the natural area. The nest boxes in all 4 grids were checked weekly from May 23 to July 21, 2020. On each visit I recorded the extent of construction for each nest, the number of eggs, the number and ages of any nestlings, and the presence of any adult birds nearby. The House Wren boxes are also frequently used by Tree Swallows, swallow nests were also monitored according to the same protocol. 51 of the 99 nest boxes in the House Wren grids were occupied during the survey period. 35 of those boxes were occupied by House Wrens; the remaining 16 nest boxes were occupied by Tree Swallows. House Wrens nesting in the grids had an average clutch size of 6.44 eggs; Tree Swallows in the same grids had an average clutch size of 4.62 eggs. The average number of nestlings in House Wren nests was 5.08; the average number of Tree Swallow nestlings in the grids was 3.83. Of the 35 House Wren nests constructed, 11 had young that successfully fledged, giving what appears to be a success rate of 31%.
    [Show full text]
  • House Wren Troglodytes Aedon
    House Wren Troglodytes aedon House Wrens are small, plain, brown birds, more distinguished for their exuberant, me­ lodious voices and frenetic behavior than for their outward appearance. Although far from abundant, House Wrens are among the more familiar inhabitants of yards, gar­ dens, and farm hedgerows in the warmer ! parts of Vermont. They are cavity nesters, taking readily to birdhouses and utilizing a wide variety of natural and artificial cavities. ~! House Wrens forage near the ground and thus prefer the cover provided by thick, brushy vegetation. These birds are not al­ dates for Vermont, determined from 10 ways associated with human habitation; iso­ clutches, range from May 18 to July 16. lated pairs may be found nesting in a variety Records of 17 nests containing young in­ of locales, including beaver ponds, swamps, clude dates from June 10 to August 2; six hedgerows, and streamside thickets. dates for recently fledged young range from Male House Wrens return to Vermont in June 24 to August 8. Late fledgling dates late April and early May; most are back by suggest that eggs are sometimes laid as late the first week of May. They immediately set as the first week of July. Although House about establishing territories by sounding Wrens are usually double-brooded, in north­ their distinctive loud, bubbling warble, and ern Vermont most pairs probably only man­ begin claiming all available nest sites within age a single brood. The species' autumn their territories by building stick "nests" in migration is inconspicuous, probably peak­ all nearby cavities. Nest sites are generally ing in September.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Houses for Cavity Nesting Songbirds – SW Oregon – Guidelines
    Lee Webb, Wildlife Biologist 22 March 2002 Bird Houses for Cavity Nesting Songbirds – SW Oregon – Guidelines Nest Box Placement 1. Face box away from afternoon sun, nor should the prevailing wind blow into the opening. 2. Correct height, but not so high the box can’t be checked or cleaned (see Table below). 3. Generally, nest boxes placed on the bare portion of a tree trunk or on a pole in the open have a better chance of being occupied than do boxes surrounded by vegetation. 4. The top of the box should not tip to the rear (backwards). Young birds might not be able to get out! 5. Boxes do not need perches, which serve predators better than residents of the boxes. 6. Well-spaced-out boxes will receive more use than those clustered together. (Avoid inter- and intra-species territorial conflicts.) If possible, place boxes so that one cannot be seen from another. 7. Black-capped chickadee (conifer), White-breasted Nuthatch (conifer), Oak Titmouse (hardwood), and Ash-throated Flycatcher (hardwood) seem to favor nest boxes placed up into the lowest live limbs of the preferred tree type, a short distance (perhaps 1 to 3 feet) out from the bole, preferably not in densely vegetative limbs, but somewhat open. (Dennis Vroman) Song birds which use standard “square” nest boxes with an entrance hole of 1½" SW Oregon (Siskiyou National Forest and surrounding areas) Likely Possible (these species tend to prefer natural “tree-like” cavities) Western Bluebird Black-capped Chickadee* Mountain Bluebird (at high elevation) Chestnut-backed Chickadee* (higher elevation) Tree Swallow Mountain Chickadee* (at high elevation) Violet-green Swallow White-breasted Nuthatch* (valleys, foothills) House Finch (sometimes nest in bird houses) Red-breasted Nuthatch* (higher elevation) House Wren* Oak Titmouse* (valleys, foothills) Bewick’s Wren* Bold = most common nest box users in interior (Rogue/Illinois) valleys.
    [Show full text]
  • Foraging Behavior of Plain-Mantled Tit-Spinetail (Leptasthenura Aegithaloides) in Semiarid Matorral, North-Central Chile
    ORNITOLOGIA NEOTROPICAL 22: 247–256, 2011 © The Neotropical Ornithological Society FORAGING BEHAVIOR OF PLAIN-MANTLED TIT-SPINETAIL (LEPTASTHENURA AEGITHALOIDES) IN SEMIARID MATORRAL, NORTH-CENTRAL CHILE Andrew Engilis Jr. & Douglas A. Kelt Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology - University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Resumen. – Comportamiento de forrajeo del tijeral (Leptasthenura aegithaloides) en matorral semiárido, centro-norte de Chile. – Hemos estudiado el comportamiento de forrajeo del tijeral (Leptas- thenura aegithaloides) en el matorral del centro-norte de Chile. Se trata de una especie de la familia Fur- nariidae que es insectívora recolectora desde perchas. Frecuenta los arbustos más dominantes y busca presas y alimentos principalmente en el follaje, grupos de flores, pequeñas ramas y masas de líquenes. Los arbustos preferidos incluyen a Porlieria y Baccharis. Se alimentan desde alturas cercanas al suelo hasta arbustos superiores a dos metros de altura. Se los encuentra más frecuentemente en parejas o en grupos pequeños, posiblemente familias, de tres a cinco aves. Las densidades promedio en el matorral (1,49 - 1,69 aves por hectárea) son mayores que las reportadas para otros lugares. Los tijerales en el matorral forman grupos de especies mixtas con facilidad, especialmente en el invierno Austral. Su estrategia de forrajeo y su comportamiento son similares a las del Mito sastrecillo de América del Norte (Psaltriparus minimus) y del Mito común (Aegithalos caudatus), ambos de la familia Aegithalidae, sugir- iendo estrategias ecológicas convergentes en ambientes estructuralmente similares. Abstract. – We studied foraging behavior of Plain-mantled Tit-spinetail (Leptasthenura aegithaloides) in matorral (scrubland) habitat of north-central Chile.
    [Show full text]
  • Early- to Mid-Succession Birds Guild
    Supplemental Volume: Species of Conservation Concern SC SWAP 2015 Early- to Mid-Succession Birds Guild Bewick's Wren Thryomanes bewickii Blue Grosbeak Guiraca caerulea Blue-winged Warbler Vermivora pinus Brown Thrasher Toxostoma rufum Chestnut-sided Warbler Dendroica pensylvanic Dickcissel Spiza americana Eastern Kingbird Tyrannus tyrannus Eastern Towhee Pipilo erythrophthalmus Golden-winged Warbler Vermivora chrysoptera Gray Kingbird Tyrannus dominicensis Indigo Bunting Passerina cyanea Orchard Oriole Icterus spurius Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor White-eyed Vireo Vireo griseus Yellow-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus americanus Yellow-breasted Chat Icteria virens NOTE: The Yellow-billed Cuckoo is also discussed in the Deciduous Forest Interior Birds Guild. Contributors (2005): Elizabeth Ciuzio (KYDNR), Anna Huckabee Smith (NCWRC), and Dennis Forsythe (The Citadel) Reviewed and Edited: (2012) John Kilgo (USFS), Nick Wallover (SCDNR); (2013) Lisa Smith (SCDNR) and Anna Huckabee Smith (SCDNR) DESCRIPTION Taxonomy and Basic Description All bird species in this guild belong to the taxonomic order Passeriformes (perching birds) and they are grouped in 9 different families. The Blue-winged, Chestnut-sided, Golden-winged, and Prairie Warblers are in the family Parulidae (the wood warblers). The Eastern and Gray Kingbirds are in the flycatcher family, Tyrannidae. The Blue Grosbeak, Dickcissel, and Indigo Bunting are in the family Cardinalidae. The Bewick’s Wren is in the wren family, Troglodytidae. The orchard oriole belongs to the family Icteridae. The Brown Thrasher is in the family Mimidae, the Yellow-billed Cuckoo belongs to the family Cuculidae, the Eastern Towhee is in the family Emberizidae, and the White-eyed Vireo is in the family Vireonidae. All are small Blue-winged Warbler birds and can be distinguished by song, appearance, and habitat preference.
    [Show full text]
  • House Wren Nest-Destroying Behavior’
    The Condor 88:190-193 0 The Cooper Ornithological Society 1986 HOUSE WREN NEST-DESTROYING BEHAVIOR’ JEAN-CLAUDE BELLES-ISLES AND JAROSLAV PICMAN Department of Biology, Universityof Ottawa, Ottawa KIN 6N5, Canada Abstract. House Wren (Troglodytesaedon) nest-destroying behavior was studied by experi- mentally offering 38 wrens nestswith eggs(or nestlings)throughout the nesting season.Individuals of both sexespecked all six types of eggspresented, regardless of the nest type and location. House Wrens also attacked conspecificyoung. Older nestlings(nine days old) were less vulnerable than three-day-old young. Our resultssuggest that nest-destroyingbehavior is inherent in all adult House Wrens but is inhibited in mated males and breeding females. It is suggestedthat nest destruction may have evolved as an interference mechanism reducing intra- and interspecific competition. Key words: House Wren; Troglodytes aedon; infanticide;nest destruction; competition. INTRODUCTION specificnestlings? (3) Is this behavior exhibited Destruction of eggs by small passerinesis a throughout the breeding season?(4) Do indi- relatively rare phenomenon which has been vidual House Wrens destroy neststhroughout observed mainly in members of two families, their breeding cycle? (5) How widespread is the Troglodytidae and Mimidae. Species this behavior among individuals from a pop- known to destroy eggsinclude the Marsh Wren ulation? (6) Is this behavior a local phenom- (Cistothoruspalustris; Allen 19 14); House enon or is it characteristic of all House Wren Wren (Troglodytesaedon; Sherman 1925, populations?(7) What is the adaptive value of Kendeigh 194 1); Cactus Wren (Campylorhyn- this behavior? thusbrunneicapillus; Anderson and Anderson METHODS 1973); SedgeWren (Cistothorusplatensis; Pic- man and Picman 1980); Bewick’s Wren This study was conducted at Presqu’ile Pro- (Thryomanesbewickii; J.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Report Species - Cistothorus Platensis Page I of 19
    Comprehensive Report Species - Cistothorus platensis Page I of 19 NatureServe () EXPLORER • '•rr•K•;7",,v2' <-~~~ •••'F"'< •j • ':'•k• N :;}• <"• Seach bot. the Dat -Abou-U Cot Chana eCrite «<Previous I Next»> Cistothorusplatensis - (Latham, 1790) Google, Sedge Wren Search for Images on Google Spanish Common Names: Chivirin Sabanero, Chercan de las Vegas French Common Names: Troglodyte & bec court Other Common Names: Curruira-do-Campo Unique Identifier: ELEMENTGLOBAL.2.105322 Element Code: ABPBG10010 Informal Taxonomy: Animals, Vertebrates - Birds - Perching Birds Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Genus Animalia Craniata Aves Passeriformes Troglodytidae Cistothorus Genus Size: B - Very small genus (2-5 species) Check this box to expand all report sections: Concept Reference 0 Concept Reference: American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC. 829 pp. Concept Reference Code: B98AOU01NAUS Name Used in Concept Reference: Cistothorusplatensis Taxonomic Comments: Formerly known as Short-billed Marsh-Wren. Composed of three groups: STELLARIS (Sedge Wren), PLATENSIS (Western Grass-Wren), and POLYGLOTTUS (Eastern Grass-Wren) (AOU 1998). Constitutes a superspecies with C. MERIDAE and C. APOLINARI (AOU 1998). Conservation Status 0 NatureServe Status Global Status: G5 Global Status Last Reviewed: 03Dec1996 Global Status Last Changed: 03Dec1996 Rounded Global Status: G5 - Secure Nation: United States National Status: N4B,N5N Nation: Canada National Status:N5B
    [Show full text]
  • LIFE HISTORY of the SOUTHERN HOUSE WREN by ALEXANDER F
    May, 1953 121 LIFE HISTORY OF THE SOUTHERN HOUSE WREN By ALEXANDER F. SKUTCH From Canada to the Strait of Magellan, House Wrens are so widely distributed over the American continents that scarcely anyone who has given attention to ornithology anywhere within this vast area will need an introduction to them. Wherever he meets them, the bird-watcher finds these active small birds so similar in their brown plumage, barred on wings and tail, and so much alike in voice and mannerisms, that he is inclined to question why systematists should place the House Wrens of temperate North America in one species (Troglodyltes agdon) , and those spreading over the extensive region from southern Mexico to Patagonia in another (T. musculus). The modern classification of birds includes in the same species many wrens whose coloration differs far more strik- ingly than does that of the two House Wrens. Differences in the lengths of wings and tail are now used to keep Troglodytes aifdon distinct from T. musc~lus despite the many reasons which might be adduced for joining them more closely in our systems of taxonomy. In Central America, Southern House Wrens are found almost everywhere, from sea- level up to 9000 feet in both Guatemala and Costa Rica, and in arid no less than in excessively rainy districts. As with a number of other species,a wide latitudinal distri- bution is matched by a wide altitudinal one. These wrens seem to be somewhat more abundant in the interior than on the coasts, probably because at moderate elevations in ’ Central America man has more thoroughly cleared the land and raised more buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Unusual Behavior in Parental Care by a House Wren (Troglodytes Aedon): Post Fledging Use of an Old Nest During Cold Nights
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Articles Publications 9-1-2015 Unusual Behavior in Parental Care by a House Wren (Troglodytes aedon): Post Fledging Use of an Old Nest During Cold Nights Micah N. Scholer University of British Columbia Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/sagestep_articles Part of the Animal Sciences Commons, and the Plant Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Scholer, M.N. Unusual Behavior in Parental Care by a House Wren (Troglodytes aedon): Post Fledging Use of an Old Nest During Cold Nights. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 127(3), 545-547, (1 September 2015) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Publications at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Unusual Behavior in Parental Care by a House Wren (Troglodytes aedon): Post Fledging Use of an Old Nest During Cold Nights Author: Scholer, Micah N. Source: The Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 127(3) : 545-547 Published By: The Wilson Ornithological Society URL: https://doi.org/10.1676/14-083.1 BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Complete website, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/terms-of-use. Usage of BioOne Complete content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non - commercial use.
    [Show full text]
  • Why House Wrens Destroy Clutches of Other Birds: a Support for the Nest Site Competition Hypothesis’
    184 SHORT COMMUNICATIONS ican birds. Vol. 5. Yale University Press, New WHITE, C. M., AND T. J. CADE. 1971. Cliff nesting Haven. raptorsand ravens along the Colville River in arc- POOLE,K. G., AND R. G. BROMLEY. 1988. Natural tic Alaska. Living Bird 10:107-150. history of the Gyrfalcon in the central Canadian WHITE, C. M., AND D. G. ROSENEAU.1970. Obser- Arctic. Arctic 41:3 l-38. vations on food, nesting, and winter populations USPENSKII,S. M. 1969. [Life in high latitudes:a study of large North American falcons. Condor 72: 113- of bird life.] Mysl Publishers, Moscow. 115. WALKER,D. A., ANDK. R. EVERETT.1987. Road dust and its environmental impact on Alaskan taiga and tundra. Arc. and Alp. Res. 19:479489. The Condor 93:1X4-185 0 The CooperOrnithological Society I99 1 WHY HOUSE WRENS DESTROY CLUTCHES OF OTHER BIRDS: A SUPPORT FOR THE NEST SITE COMPETITION HYPOTHESIS’ STANISLAVPRIBIL AND JAROSLAVPICMAN Department of Biology, Universityof Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario KIN 6N5, Canada Key words: House Wren; Troglodytes aedon; egg receding from the House Wren nest; the first box was destruction;cannibalism: competition. 20 m from the wren nest. Each nesting box contained a dry-grass nest with one quail (Coturnix chinensis) House Wrens, Troglodytesaedon. are notorious for egg.The wren nestscontained either eggsor small nest- destroying clutches of other birds, including those of lings of the first brood. The nestingboxes were checked conspecifics.The destruction usually involves pecking after 6 hr, 1 day and 3 days. During the three-day holes in eggs and removing the soft lining from the period.
    [Show full text]
  • Critter Class Nuthatches
    Critter Class Nuthatches White breasted Nuthatch December 1, 2011 MVK: Some were asking where the nuthatch got the name - They get their common name from their habit of jamming large nuts and acorns into tree bark, then whacking them with their sharp bill to “hatch” out the seed from the inside. White- breasted Nuthatches may be small but their voices are loud, and often their insistent nasal yammering will lead you right to them. Per Allaboutbirds.com MVK: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHlTrWQbnms MVK: White-breasted nuthatch by E. George Strasser There is a little bird, who lives in my hometown. he is the strangest bird, as he's mostly upside down. He may come to your feeder, for a seed or two to take. he really does like best, to peck a suet cake. He searches bark for insects, and his wings may start to flutter. when he finds somebody's feeder, is filled with peanut butter. The constant nasal chatter, whenever he's around. you'll know exactly who it is, when you just hear the sound. How they named this bird, I really do not know. he's surely not a nut, and hatched a while ago. Through snow or heat of summer, at any time of year. he migrates not at all, so always will be here. As you watch this small bird's antics, you'll never have a frown. because this little bird, is mostly upside down Critter Class – Nuthatches 1 12/1/2011 Comment: I love to watch Snitch walking straight down that concrete wall in the bear pen.
    [Show full text]