COMMENTARY

Wanderers of Rajaji: are learning new lessons in the changing environment?

Ritesh Joshi

Factors which influence learning of ridors in revealed that the presence and the Asian elephant15. However, only behaviour in wild animal populations are of traffic on the road, construction of few studies have been conducted on the important for understanding the re- steep retaining walls and human popula- social organization of Asian elephants sponses of species to changing environ- tion along the entire Rajaji–Corbett wild- throughout their range. Future studies ments and for their conservation1. An life corridor area have almost restricted should focus on a better understanding of important and often neglected aspect of the migration of elephants between the the social organizations of Asian ele- behavioural ecology concerns the ability Rajaji and Corbett National Parks11. The phants. Despite the fact that RNP is one of animal populations and individuals to northwestern population in of the crucial and biologically rich pro- respond to changes in their immediate India once had a continuous range, from tected areas, little has been done on the environment, both on long- and short- Katerniaghat Wildlife Sanctuary in the behaviour of Asian elephants. In con- term basis2. (Elephas east, to the Yamuna river in the west; trast, several studies have been con- maximus) is one of the flagship species however, over the time this continuity ducted on the movement and status of in the Indian forests, which requires has been broken, and now the whole ecological corridors of the elephants, large landscapes for movement, feeding, population occurs in six isolated sub- which revealed their movement pattern etc. Connectivity of large migratory cor- populations12,13. Though RNP has been in the entire Rajaji–Corbett National ridors helps the elephant to move across recently notified as the Rajaji Re- Parks11,16,17. While studying elephants in larger landscapes and breed conven- serve to enhance conservation activities, the northwestern Shivalik landscape for iently, ensuring its long-term survival. providing a natural connectivity for fre- about a decade, the present article obser- However, the population of this giant quent movement of elephants has been ved a few of their behavioural responses, animal remains fragmented and restricted one of the major challenges. RNP has which revealed that the elephants were to the foothills-dominant areas, mainly been maintaining a stable population of learning to adapt themselves to fulfil because of the conversion of natural elephants for the last one and half dec- their requirements, according to the habitats in the fertile river valleys to ag- ades, with an average of 394.5  71.90 changing environment. ricultural fields, industrial areas and hu- (range 302–469) individuals14. Elephants live in a matriarchal society, man settlements3. It is now widely Various aspects of social organization where the oldest female usually leads the acknowledged that the elephants are in- have been intensively studied in African group. In contrast, bull elephants prefer telligent and learning to adapt to their savannah elephant (Loxodonta africana to lead a solitary life, especially after changing natural environments4–6. They africana), compared to the African forest attaining the pubertal stage. Male ele- possess higher levels of intelligence and elephant (Loxodonta africana cyclotis) phants are known to use a wide range of cognitive abilities, and thus are capable of exhibiting novel behavioural re- sponses to a changing environment7. The Rajaji National Park (RNP; 2915–3031N, 7752–7822E; Figure 1) is one of the crucial wildlife habitats in the northwestern Shivalik landscape in , forming the northwestern limit of the range of elephants in India. It falls within the Gangetic Plains bio- geographic zone and upper Gangetic Plains province8; and a major portion of the area is dominated by tropical moist deciduous forest. RNP is spread at an elevation of 302–1000 m and has been considered as the northwestern limit of distribution of many endangered species like the Asian elephant, tiger, great-pied hornbill and king cobra9,10. Isolation of large migratory corridors and increasing anthropogenic and deve- lopmental activities have been some of the causes threatening the survival of elephants in the area. One of the studies Figure 1. Location map of the Rajaji National Park, Uttarakhand, India indicating carried out on the status of elephant cor- important wildlife corridors and crop-raiding areas.

1808 CURRENT SCIENCE, VOL. 112, NO. 9, 10 MAY 2017 COMMENTARY habitats, and travel more distances com- recorded ranging from ~300 to 700 m. phants were familiar with these fences. pared to the family groups. They are However, above this elevation, their Elephants use twigs or branches of trees known to enter agricultural fields to feed movement was found to be rare and sea- on the fences and/or bend the iron pillars on cultivated crops and return to the sonal. During monsoon, on several occa- of the fences causing the electric current forest unharmed. While studying the sions, the present author recorded the to trip due to wet ground vegetation. behaviour of elephants in RNP, it was movement of male elephants at an eleva- They would then bend the iron pillars observed that the bull elephants arrive tion of ~980 m on the outskirts of vil- with their forefoot and cross the fence. and assemble in the forest adjacent to the lages, situated along the boundary of Similar observations were made from the agricultural fields in the afternoon and the park, mainly to feed upon palatable southern Indian elephant ranges from stay there till dusk; they enter the fields crops in these villages. A few of the where they were reported to use their by forming groups and return to the for- villages, where the movement of ele- tusks, soles of forefeet and trees to cross est before dawn. As observed, the tim- phants was recorded include Talla Banas the fence22. A study carried out by a ings of their movements entirely depend (2958384N, 7819930E; 943 m), team from World Wildlife Fund indi- on the distances which have to be cov- Kasaan (2958810N, 781710E; cated that in parts of South Asia, some ered. However, sometimes they also get 983 m) and Garakot (295429.7N, elephants eventually adapted to pro- trapped in the villages when they stay in 782219.4E; 970 m). A number of vil- longed exposure to these fences. Ele- the fields for longer duration up to dawn lages situated along the eastern boundary phants have been reported to break or when they travel long distances during of the Park grow various cash crops like electric fences using their tusks, which night and are not able to return from the paddy, wheat, maize, etc. It was also are considered to be non-conductive; and fields. In such situations, bull elephants observed during the study that elephants few elephants appeared to have learnt stay in any of the small forest patches prefer to move across higher ridges dur- that an electric shock does not harm them (islands) located in the River and ing monsoon, as all the natural water and simply barged through the wires23. sometimes in the agricultural fields. sources located across the hilly terrain Recently, similar reports from the south- It was observed during several occa- are filled with rainwater during mon- ern Indian elephant ranges showed that sions that the older bull elephants were soon, and several species of grasses like the elephants were short-circuiting the getting used to facing the crowds and Neyraudia arundinacea (Madagascar electric fences using logs24. A study in vehicular traffic pressure. The bull ele- grass), Desmostachya bipinnata (sacrifi- Africa also indicated a similar observa- phants, especially older ones, while cial grass) and Dendrocalamus strictus tion, wherein the elephants were reported crossing the national highways/motor (bamboo) grow in abundance in the high to have short-circuited the electric fences roads, were observed to show no fear of ridges of the Park. in order to gain access to crops or water any objects, whether vehicular traffic or Electric fences have been considered installation. This study observed that the the crowds (Figure 2). Sometimes, ele- as one of the effective barriers to restrict elephants had learnt to protect them- phants spent a few minutes standing on elephants from entering crop fields19–21. selves against electric shock while break- the road and facing the vehicular traffic During 2006–2011, on a few occasions, ing an electrified fence using a tusk or and exhibiting mock charges to threaten observations were made from areas adja- even holding a rock to the forehead or the crowds standing there. A study car- cent to the Shyampur and Chiriapur throwing a tree into the fence25. Another ried out on the life history of male Afri- forests of Forest Division, study in Sri Lanka reported that the elec- can elephants suggested that older males Uttarakhand, that some of the bull ele- tric fence could not prevent the elephants were more likely to be raiders than young males, when their closest associ- ates were also raiders and when their second closest associates were raiders older than them1. Another study carried out in the northwestern Shivalik land- scape on the social bonding of male ele- phants indicated that the bull elephants in the area have a year round association, mainly during their movements outside the boundaries of protected habitats and during raiding of crops18. Individual adult and sub-adult male elephants are known to show a higher propensity of occurrence in high-disturbance areas when forming groups, whereas solitary elephants are suggested to exhibit the least propensity in such areas2. Generally the movement of elephants occurs across the higher ridges of the

Park during monsoon and is confined to lowlands during winter and summer. In Figure 2. Bull elephants crossing the Haridwar–Bijnor national highway, across the RNP, the movement of elephants was Rajaji Tiger Reserve.

CURRENT SCIENCE, VOL. 112, NO. 9, 10 MAY 2017 1809 COMMENTARY from entering the agriculture fields, since ridors. Whereas elephants were reported human beings30. During 1970s, after the they had learnt to break these fences26. using the Rawasan–Sonanadi corridor on establishment of Chilla Hydroelectric It was observed during the study a regular basis. Elephant movement was Power Station, RNP was divided into period that the feeding requirements of not observed in the Motichur–Gohri cor- two major parts – the eastern part and the the elephants have undergone changes ridor for about half a decade, before western part. Also, after the establish- over the last decade. Like human beings, 2010, when they were first observed ment of Uttarakhand State in 2000, in- elephants also have feeding preferences; moving across this corridor. In 2010, a creased rate of vehicular traffic pressure they take interest in exploring new spe- recognized bull elephant was observed the Haridwar– national high- cies to feed upon. In RNP, elephants using this corridor for nearly a month; way and railway track across RNP, and were reported to feed on 50 species, out whether he entered the eastern part of the establishment of SIDCUL along the of which 37 (74%) are trees and 13 Park (Gohri forest) or not, is unknown. southwestern boundary of the Park had (26%) are shrubs, grasses and climbers All these observations may indicate that restricted frequent movements of the species27. Interestingly, the elephants the elephants in the northwestern Shiv- elephant. This had also affected the ele- were reported feeding on Tectona gran- alik landscape are adapting to the chang- phant movement between Rajaji and dis (sagaun/teak) and Haplophragma ing environment. It is important to note Corbett National Parks. Nearly 14,100 adenophylla (kut-sagaun) in 2006 in that elephants are attempting to find new vehicles were recorded passing across Chilla forest of RNP. The bark of teak is ways to move across their traditional this highway everyday, except for 3 h at frequently consumed by the elephants in home-ranges, which were not accessible night31. southern India, but rarely observed in the about two to three decades ago. Further The widening of the Haridwar– northern part of the country22. Similarly, study is required to investigate how the Dehradun national highway to four lanes in 2007, elephants were reported feeding elephants, especially older bulls, are ex- could affect the movement of elephants on Eucalyptus obliqua (eucalyptus)28. In ploring new areas and previously inac- across various wildlife corridors. Keep- 1990s, elephants were first reported cessible traditional home-ranges, which ing in view the importance of biodiver- using the bark of eucalyptus tree in ele- would help in understanding the use of sity and animal movement across these phant ranges of the southern India22. changing landscapes by elephants, for corridors, efforts are being made to faci- During the same year, elephants were better management of human–elephant litate such movements by constructing a also reported feeding on quite a few tree co-existence. natural connectivity across various corri- species for the first time, which included During 1999–2000, movements of a dors. Four flyovers are being constructed Cordia obliqua (clammy cherry), Holar- few of the identified groups of elephants (each ~0.5 km long) in different animal- rhena antidysenterica (Tellicherry) and were recorded across Jagjeetpur village, crossing areas, which lie within the Mitragyna parvifolia (kaim). In 2009, which had arrived from the Rawli/ Motichur–Kansrao and Motichur–Chilla elephants were reported to have started Ranipur forest of RNP (southwestern corridors. consuming the Careya arborea (wild part of the Park). The elephants used to Today, the Asian elephant is listed guava) in the Park area. The sporadic cross Roshnabad, Ravli–Mehdood, Sub- under Schedule I of the Indian Wildlife feeding among elephants and their explo- hash Nagar and Pandowala villages, and (Protection) Act 1972, Appendix I of the ration of new plant species, which could the Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited and CITES and as Endangered in IUCN Red have a greater influence in the regenera- Ranipur Jhal areas, which at that time List of Threatened Species. Increasing tion of vegetation, need to be further had less human population. This tradi- developmental and anthropogenic activi- studied. A recent study in Nepal indi- tional track was earlier a connecting cor- ties across the boundaries of the Park, cated that the rapidly growing elephant ridor for elephant movements between shrinkage of natural water sources inside population may modify the composition the southwestern and eastern parts of the protected areas, expansion of road of the forest by increasing its preferred RNP, and had facilitated movement be- networks existing across long fragments food species29. tween RNP and Corbett Tiger Reserve. of protected habitats, and poor awareness Four crucial wildlife corridors exist Elephants used this tract frequently of the local communities about the eco- across the RNP, which connect it with before 1990, as part of their traditional logical role of species were observed to the Corbett Tiger Reserve, namely Moti- home-range. However, after 2001, such be some of the conservation threats to chur–Kansrao–Barkot (2.5 km long  2 km movements were entirely restricted, elephants and wildlife in general. RNP is wide), Chilla–Motichur (3.5 km long  mainly because of establishment of the now experiencing advocacy of develop- 1 km wide), Rawasan–Sonanadi (10 km State Industrial Development Corpora- ment and conservation together. To sci- long  5 km wide) and Motichur–Gohri tion of Uttarakhand Limited along the entifically address all the conservation (4 km long  1 km wide). During the boundary of RNP. issues would be a challenging task. It is, study of about a decade, I observed that RNP is one of the crucial elephant however, important to document and the movement of wildlife, especially ele- habitats in the northwestern Shivalik observe in the next few years, how the phants was restricted in these corridors, landscape. However, fragmentation of wide-ranging elephants adapt themselves mainly because of the presence of two large forests has converted the larger to the changing environment and how national highways (Dehradun–Haridwar family units of elephants into smaller development of the area would help the and Haridwar–Bijnor) and a railway ones. A study carried out on the mortal- locals without affecting conservation. track (Dehradun–Haridwar), which exist ity of tuskers in RNP and adjoining habi- in RNP. Some elephant populations were tats revealed that wide-ranging tuskers in rarely reported using the Chilla–Moti- this landscape were pocketed in small 1. Chiyo, P. I., Moss, C. J. and Alberts, chur and Motichur–Kansrao–Barkot cor- areas and were facing confrontation with S. C., PLoS ONE, 2012, 7(2), e31382.

1810 CURRENT SCIENCE, VOL. 112, NO. 9, 10 MAY 2017 COMMENTARY

2. Srinivasaiah, N. M., Anand, V. D., Vaid- 2015. Report, Wildlife Preservation Or- 26. Ranjeewa, A. D. G., Tharanga, Y. J. S., yanathan, S. and Sinha, A., PLoS ONE, ganisation, Uttarakhand Forest Depart- Sandanayake, G. H. N. A., Perera, B. V. 2012, 7(8), e42571. ment, Uttarakhand, India, 2015. and Fernando, P., Gajah, 2015, 42, 3. Singh, A. P. and Chalisgaonkar, R., Res- 15. Vidya, T. N. C. and Sukumar, R., Curr. 7–14. toration of corridors to facilitate the Sci., 2005, 89(7), 1200–1207. 27. Joshi, R. and Singh, R., J. Am. Sci., movement of wild Asian elephants in 16. Johnsingh, A. J. T., Prasad, S. N. and 2008, 4(2), 34–48. Rajaji–Corbett elephant range. Irrigation Goyal, S. P., Biol. Cons., 1990, 51, 125– 28. Joshi, R. and Singh, R., Gajah, 2008, 29, Department, , India, 2006; 138. 32–34. https://www.pdffiller.com/en/project/ 17. Johnsingh, A. J. T. and Joshua, J., Oryx, 29. Pradhan, N. M. B., Wegge, P. and Moe, 65298359.htm?form_id=100528626 1994, 28(2), 135–140. S. R., J. Zool., 2007, 273(2), 183–191. 4. Plotnik, J. M. and de Waal, F. B. M., 18. Joshi, R., Hystrix, 2015, 26(1), 41–45. 30. Joshi, R. and Singh, R., Natl. Acad. Sci. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 2014, 111(14), 19. Hoare, R., Pachyderm, 1995, 19, 54– Lett., 2010, 33(7–8), 205–215. 5071–5072. 63. 31. Joshi, R. et al., Global J. Environ. Res., 5. Holdrege, C., The Flexible Giant, Seeing 20. Williams, A. C., Johnsingh, A. J. T. and 2010, 4(2), 113–126. the Elephant Whole, The Nature Insti- Krausman, P. R., Wildl. Soc. Bull., 2001, tute, New York, 2003, p. 70. 29(4), 1097–1104. 6. Rangarajan, M. et al., Gajah: Securing 21. Thirunavukarasu, V., Assessment of hu- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. I thank the the Future for Elephants in India. Report man elephant conflicts and mitigation three anonymous reviewers and the Section of the Elephant Task Force, Ministry of measures to resolve the conflict in Editor, for providing valuable inputs and Environment, Forest and Climate Dharamapuri Forest Division, Tamil comments that helped improve the manu- Change, Government of India, New Nadu, India. Paper, MCT Phase IV as- script. I also thank the Department of Science Delhi, 2010. signment, 2014; http://www.teriuni- and Technology, Government of India for 7. Report of the Elephant Task versity.ac.in/mct/pdf/new/assignment/V_ providing financial support to study the eco- Force, submitted to Honourable High Thirunavukarasu%20_Dharamapuri_di- logy of Asian elephants in Rajaji National Court of Karnataka, 2012; http://www. vision.pdf Park during 2005–2008; Directors of G.B. atree.org/sites/default/files/KETF%20- 22. Sukumar, R., Elephant Days and Nights: Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Final%20Report%20SCREEN%20RES.pdf Ten Years with the Indian Elephant, Development, , Uttarakhand and Doon 8. Rodgers, W. A., Panwar, H. S. and Oxford University Press, New Delhi, Institute of Management and Research, Mathur, V. B., Wildlife Protected Areas 1994. , Uttarakhand for infrastructure sup- in India: A Review (Executive Summary), 23. Fernando, P., Ananda Kumar, M., port during the research period; Uttarakhand Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Christy Williams, A., Wikramanayake, State Forest Department for providing permis- 2002. E., Aziz, T. and Singh, S. M., Review of sion to study elephants in Rajaji National 9. Anon., Elephant at crossroads, ENVIS human-elephant conflict mitigation Park; and the forest officers of RNP, numer- (wildlife & protected areas), Wildlife measures practiced in South Asia. ous villagers, Gujjars and forest staff, for pro- Institute of India, Dehradun, 1998. AREAS technical support document viding assistance and valuable information 10. Kumar, H. and Subudhi, S. P., Cibtech J. submitted to World Bank, World Wide during the field surveys. Zool., 2013, 2(1), 30–39. Fund for Nature, 2008. 11. Johnsingh, A. J. T. and Williams, A. C., 24. Elephants prove to be cleverer than man. Oryx, 1999, 33(3), 210–214. Deccan Chronicle, 3 June 2015; http://

12. Singh, V. B., J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., www.deccanchronicle.com/150603/nation- Ritesh Joshi is in the Conservation & 1978, 75, 71–82. current-affairs/article/elephants-prove-be- 13. Johnsingh, A. J. T., Qureshi, Q., Mohan, cleverer-man Survey Division, Ministry of Environ- D. and Williams, C. A., Gajah, 2006, 25, 25. O’Connell, C., Elephant Don, the Poli- ment, Forest and Climate Change, Indira 61–70. tics of a Pachyderm Posse, The Univer- Paryavaran Bhawan, Jor Bagh Road, 14. Uttarakhand Forest Department. Wild sity of Chicago Press, Chicago and New Delhi 110 003, India. Asiatic elephant, population estimation London, 2015. e-mail: [email protected]

CURRENT SCIENCE, VOL. 112, NO. 9, 10 MAY 2017 1811