Category Family Scientific Name

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Category Family Scientific Name CATEGORY FAMILY SCIENTIFIC_NAME COMMON_NAME S_RANK N_RANK G_RANK ESEA SARA COSEWIC Lichen Acarosporaceae Acarospora canadensis a lichen SNR N3 GNR Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Lichen Acarosporaceae Acarospora fuscata Brown Cobblestone Lichen S2S4 N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Lichen Acarosporaceae Acarospora glaucocarpa Rimmed Cobbelstone Lichen S2S4 N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Lichen Acarosporaceae Caeruleum heppii a cobblestone lichen SU N1 GNR Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Lichen Acarosporaceae Polysporina simplex a lichen S2S3 NNR G5? Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Lichen Acarosporaceae Sarcogyne regularis Frosted Grain-spored Lichen S3S5 N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Lichen Acarosporaceae Sporastatia testudinea Copper Patch Lichen SU N4N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Lichen Acarosporaceae Strangospora moriformis a lichen SU NNR G2G3 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Aceraceae Acer negundo Manitoba Maple S5 N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Aceraceae Acer spicatum Mountain Maple S5 N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Aceraceae Acer tataricum ssp. ginnala Amur Maple SNA NNA GNR Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Acoraceae Acorus americanus Sweet Flag S4S5 N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Adelanthaceae Odontoschisma denudatum a liverwort SU NNR G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Adelanthaceae Odontoschisma fluitans Bog Notchwort SU N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Adelanthaceae Odontoschisma macounii Macoun's Flapwort SU N4N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Adoxaceae Adoxa moschatellina Moschatel S1 N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Lichen Agyriaceae Sarea resinae a lichen SNR NNR GNR Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Lichen Agyriaceae Xylographa parallela Black Woodscript Lichen S3S5 N4 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Lichen Agyriaceae Xylographa vitiligo White-spotted Woodscript Lichen SNR NNR G4G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Lichen Alectoriaceae Alectoria ochroleuca Green Witch's Hair Lichen S4 N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Lichen Alectoriaceae Alectoria sarmentosa Familiar Witch's Hair Lichen SU N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Alismataceae Alisma gramineum Narrow-leaved Water-plantain S1 N4N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Alismataceae Alisma triviale Common Water-plantain S5 N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Alismataceae Sagittaria cuneata Arum-leaved Arrowhead S5 N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Alismataceae Sagittaria latifolia Broad-leaved Arrowhead S4S5 N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Alismataceae Sagittaria rigida Sessile-fruited Arrowhead S2? N4 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Amaranthaceae Amaranthus albus Tumble Pigweed SNA NNA GNR Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Amaranthaceae Amaranthus blitoides Prostrate Pigweed SNA NNA GNR Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Amaranthaceae Amaranthus hybridus Smooth Pigweed SNA NNA G5? Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Amaranthaceae Amaranthus retroflexus Redroot Pigweed SNA N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Amaranthaceae Amaranthus spinosus Thorny Amaranth SNA NNA G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Amaranthaceae Amaranthus tuberculatus Tall Rough-fruit Amaranth S1? N4 GNR Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Amaranthaceae Amaranthus tuberculatus var. tuberculatus Rough-fruited water-hemp S1? NNR G4G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Amblystegiaceae Amblystegium serpens Creeping Feather Moss S4S5 N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Amblystegiaceae Calliergonella cuspidata Common Large Wetland Moss SNR N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Amblystegiaceae Campyliadelphus chrysophyllus Golden Creeping Moss SU N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Amblystegiaceae Campylium stellatum Yellow Starry Fern Moss S4S5 N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Amblystegiaceae Campylophyllum hispidulum Common Fine Wet Moss SU N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Amblystegiaceae Conardia compacta Coast Creeping Moss SU NU G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Amblystegiaceae Cratoneuron filicinum Fern-leaved Hook Moss S4S5 N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Amblystegiaceae Drepanocladus aduncus Knieff's Hook Moss S4S5 N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Amblystegiaceae Drepanocladus longifolius Long-leaved Hook Moss SU NU GNR Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Amblystegiaceae Drepanocladus polygamus Polygamous Hook Moss S4S5 N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Amblystegiaceae Drepanocladus sordidus Dusty Hook Moss SU NU G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Amblystegiaceae Hygroamblystegium varium Willow Feather Moss SU N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Amblystegiaceae Hygroamblystegium varium ssp. varium SNR NNR G5TNR Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Amblystegiaceae Hygroamblystegium varium var. humile Constricted Feather Moss SU N5 G5T5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Amblystegiaceae Hygroamblystegium varium var. varium SNR NNR G5TNR Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Amblystegiaceae Hygrohypnum alpestre Northern Brook Moss SU N4N5 G4G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Amblystegiaceae Hygrohypnum luridum Drab Brook Moss SU N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Amblystegiaceae Leptodictyum riparium Riparian Feather Moss SU N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Amblystegiaceae Platydictya confervoides Alga-like Matted Moss SNR N4N5 G4G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Amblystegiaceae Platydictya jungermannioides False Willow Moss SU N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Amblystegiaceae Pseudocalliergon brevifolium Short-leaved Spear Moss SU N4N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Amblystegiaceae Pseudocalliergon trifarium Three-ranked Spear Moss SU N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Amblystegiaceae Pseudocalliergon turgescens Turgid Scorpion Moss SU N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Amblystegiaceae Pseudocampylium radicale Long-stalked Fine Wet Moss SU NU G3G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Amblystegiaceae Sanionia uncinata Sickle-leaved Hook Moss S4S5 N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Amblystegiaceae Tomentypnum falcifolium Sickle-leaved Golden Moss SU N4N5 G3G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Manitoba Conservation Data Centre Plant Conservation Status Ranks 2018-12-11 1of55 Bryophyte Amblystegiaceae Tomentypnum nitens Golden Fuzzy Fen Moss S4S5 N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Anacardiaceae Rhus glabra Smooth Sumac S3S4 N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Anacardiaceae Toxicodendron rydbergii Poison-ivy S5 N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Anastrophyllaceae Anastrophyllum saxicola Curled Notchwort SU NU G3G4 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Anastrophyllaceae Neoorthocaulis attenuatus a liverwort SU N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Anastrophyllaceae Schljakovia kunzeana Kunze's Pawwort SU N4N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Anastrophyllaceae Sphenolobus minutus Comb Notchwort SU N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Andreaeaceae Andreaea rupestris Black Rock Moss S4S5 N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Aneuraceae Aneura pinguis Small Greasewort S3S4 N5 G5T5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Aneuraceae Riccardia latifrons Bog Germanderwort SU N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Aneuraceae Riccardia multifida Comb LIverwort SU NU G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Anomodontaceae Anomodon attenuatus Slender Anomodon Moss SU N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Anomodontaceae Anomodon minor Blunt-leaved Anomodon Moss SU N3N4 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Anomodontaceae Anomodon rostratus Common Anomodon Moss SU N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Bryophyte Antheliaceae Anthelia juratzkana Juratzka's Silverwort SU N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Apiaceae Aegopodium podagraria Goutweed SNA NNA GNR Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Apiaceae Anethum graveolens Dill SNA NNA GNR Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Apiaceae Carum carvi Caraway SNA NNA GNR Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Apiaceae Cicuta bulbifera Bulb-bearing Water-hemlock S5 N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Apiaceae Cicuta maculata Spotted Water-hemlock S4S5 N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Apiaceae Cicuta virosa Mackenzie's Water-hemlock S3S4 N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Apiaceae Cryptotaenia canadensis Canadian Honewort S1 N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Apiaceae Cymopterus glomeratus Plains Cymopterus S2S3 N5? G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Apiaceae Daucus carota Wild Carrot SNA NNA GNR Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Apiaceae Heracleum maximum Cow-parsnip S4S5 N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Apiaceae Lomatium foeniculaceum Hairy-fruited Parsley S3 N5 G5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Apiaceae Lomatium foeniculaceum ssp. foeniculaceum Hairy-fruited Parsley S3 N5 G5T5 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Vascular Plant Apiaceae Lomatium
Recommended publications
  • Phylogeny and Classification of Cryptodiscus, with a Taxonomic Synopsis of the Swedish Species
    Fungal Diversity Phylogeny and classification of Cryptodiscus, with a taxonomic synopsis of the Swedish species Baloch, E.1,3*, Gilenstam, G.2 and Wedin, M.1 1Department of Cryptogamic Botany, Swedish Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden. 2Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden. 3Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AB, UK. Baloch, E., Gilenstam, G. and Wedin, M. (2009). Phylogeny and classification of Cryptodiscus, with a taxonomic synopsis of the Swedish species. Fungal Diversity 38: 51-68. The phylogeny, taxonomy and classification of Cryptodiscus are examined. The current generic and species delimitations, and the relationship of the genus within the Ostropomycetidae, are tested by molecular phylogenetic analyses of the nuclear ITS and LSU rDNA and the mitochondrial SSU rDNA. In our new circumscription Cryptodiscus is a monophyletic group of saprotrophic and lichenized fungi characterized by small, urceolate apothecia, mostly hyaline ascomatal walls without any embedded crystals, no clear periphysoids, and with oblong to narrow- cylindrical septate ascospores. Cryptodiscus forms a well-supported clade together with Absconditella and the remaining Stictidaceae. Paschelkiella and Bryophagus are synonymised with Cryptodiscus. Species excluded from Cryptodiscus are Cryptodiscus anguillosporus, C. angulosus, C. microstomus, and C. rhopaloides. Cryptodiscus in Sweden is revised and six species are accepted, of which one is newly described: C. foveolaris, C. gloeocapsa comb. nov. (≡ Bryophagus gloeocapsa), C. incolor sp. nov., C. pallidus, C. pini comb. nov. (≡ Paschelkiella pini), and the rediscovered species C. tabularum. The additional new combinations Cryptodiscus similis comb. nov. and C.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of the Cetrarioid Core (Parmeliaceae) Based on Five
    The Lichenologist 41(5): 489–511 (2009) © 2009 British Lichen Society doi:10.1017/S0024282909990090 Printed in the United Kingdom Phylogeny of the cetrarioid core (Parmeliaceae) based on five genetic markers Arne THELL, Filip HÖGNABBA, John A. ELIX, Tassilo FEUERER, Ingvar KÄRNEFELT, Leena MYLLYS, Tiina RANDLANE, Andres SAAG, Soili STENROOS, Teuvo AHTI and Mark R. D. SEAWARD Abstract: Fourteen genera belong to a monophyletic core of cetrarioid lichens, Ahtiana, Allocetraria, Arctocetraria, Cetraria, Cetrariella, Cetreliopsis, Flavocetraria, Kaernefeltia, Masonhalea, Nephromopsis, Tuckermanella, Tuckermannopsis, Usnocetraria and Vulpicida. A total of 71 samples representing 65 species (of 90 worldwide) and all type species of the genera are included in phylogentic analyses based on a complete ITS matrix and incomplete sets of group I intron, -tubulin, GAPDH and mtSSU sequences. Eleven of the species included in the study are analysed phylogenetically for the first time, and of the 178 sequences, 67 are newly constructed. Two phylogenetic trees, one based solely on the complete ITS-matrix and a second based on total information, are similar, but not entirely identical. About half of the species are gathered in a strongly supported clade composed of the genera Allocetraria, Cetraria s. str., Cetrariella and Vulpicida. Arctocetraria, Cetreliopsis, Kaernefeltia and Tuckermanella are monophyletic genera, whereas Cetraria, Flavocetraria and Tuckermannopsis are polyphyletic. The taxonomy in current use is compared with the phylogenetic results, and future, probable or potential adjustments to the phylogeny are discussed. The single non-DNA character with a strong correlation to phylogeny based on DNA-sequences is conidial shape. The secondary chemistry of the poorly known species Cetraria annae is analyzed for the first time; the cortex contains usnic acid and atranorin, whereas isonephrosterinic, nephrosterinic, lichesterinic, protolichesterinic and squamatic acids occur in the medulla.
    [Show full text]
  • Cryptic Species and Species Pairs in Lichens: a Discussion on the Relationship Between Molecular Phylogenies and Morphological Characters
    cryptic species:07-Cryptic_species 10/12/2009 13:19 Página 71 Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid Vol. 66S1: 71-81, 2009 ISSN: 0211-1322 doi: 10.3989/ajbm.2225 Cryptic species and species pairs in lichens: A discussion on the relationship between molecular phylogenies and morphological characters by Ana Crespo & Sergio Pérez-Ortega Departamento de Biología Vegetal II, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, E-28040 Madrid, Spain [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Resumen Crespo, A. & Pérez-Ortega, S. 2009. Cryptic species and species Crespo, A. & Pérez-Ortega, S. 2009. Especies crípticas y pares de pairs in lichens: A discussion on the relationship between mole- especies en líquenes: una discusión sobre la relación entre la fi- cular phylogenies and morphological characters. Anales Jard. logenia molecular y los caracteres morfológicos. Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 66S1: 71-81. Bot. Madrid 66S1: 71-81 (en inglés). As with most disciplines in biology, molecular genetics has re- Como en otras disciplinas, el impacto producido por la filogenia volutionized our understanding of lichenized fungi. Nowhere molecular en el conocimiento de los hongos liquenizados ha has this been more true than in systematics, especially in the de- producido avances y cambios conceptuales importantes. Esto limitation of species. In many cases, molecular research has ve- ha sido especialmente cierto en la sistemática y ha afectado de rified long-standing hypotheses, but in others, results appear to una manera muy notable en aspectos
    [Show full text]
  • Antarctic Bryophyte Research—Current State and Future Directions
    Bry. Div. Evo. 043 (1): 221–233 ISSN 2381-9677 (print edition) DIVERSITY & https://www.mapress.com/j/bde BRYOPHYTEEVOLUTION Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 2381-9685 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/bde.43.1.16 Antarctic bryophyte research—current state and future directions PAULO E.A.S. CÂMARA1, MicHELine CARVALHO-SILVA1 & MicHAEL STecH2,3 1Departamento de Botânica, Universidade de Brasília, Brazil UnB; �[email protected]; http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3944-996X �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2389-3804 2Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands; 3Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9804-0120 Abstract Botany is one of the oldest sciences done south of parallel 60 °S, although few professional botanists have dedicated themselves to investigating the Antarctic bryoflora. After the publications of liverwort and moss floras in 2000 and 2008, respectively, new species were described. Currently, the Antarctic bryoflora comprises 28 liverwort and 116 moss species. Furthermore, Antarctic bryology has entered a new phase characterized by the use of molecular tools, in particular DNA sequencing. Although the molecular studies of Antarctic bryophytes have focused exclusively on mosses, molecular data (fingerprinting data and/or DNA sequences) have already been published for 36 % of the Antarctic moss species. In this paper we review the current state of Antarctic bryological research, focusing on molecular studies and conservation, and discuss future questions of Antarctic bryology in the light of global challenges. Keywords: Antarctic flora, conservation, future challenges, molecular phylogenetics, phylogeography Introduction The Antarctic is the most pristine, but also most extreme region on Earth in terms of environmental conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Icmadophila Aversa and Piccolia Conspersa, Two Lichen Species New to Bolivia
    Polish Botanical Journal 55(1): 217–221, 2010 ICMADOPHILA AVERSA AND PICCOLIA CONSPERSA, TWO LICHEN SPECIES NEW TO BOLIVIA KARINA WILK Abstract. The species Icmadophila aversa and Piccolia conspersa are reported as new to the lichen biota of Bolivia. The studied material was collected in Madidi National Park (NW Bolivia). The species are briefl y characterized and their ecology and distribution are discussed. Key words: lichenized fungi, new records, Madidi region, Andes, South America Karina Wilk, Laboratory of Lichenology, W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lubicz 46, 31-512 Kraków, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION Bolivia is still one of the countries least studied While studying the material collected in the biologically, but the data already available indi- Madidi region I identifi ed two interesting lichen cate a potentially high level of biodiversity (Ibisch species – Icmadophila aversa and Piccolia con- & Mérida 2004). Knowledge of the cryptogams, spersa. The species are reported here as new to Bo- including lichens, is particularly defi cient (Feuerer livia. Brief descriptions and notes on their ecology et al. 1998). In the last decade, however, licheno- and worldwide distribution are provided. logical studies have progressed in Bolivia. The most recent works have provided many new dis- MATERIAL AND METHODS coveries: records new to the country, continent or Southern Hemisphere, and species new to The study is based on material collected in 2006–2007 in science (e.g., Ferraro 2002; Feuerer & Sipman Madidi National Park. The collection sites are located in 2005; Flakus & Wilk 2006; Flakus & Kukwa 2007; the Cordillera Apolobamba (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Puzzle of Lichen Symbiosis
    Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 1503 The puzzle of lichen symbiosis Pieces from Thamnolia IOANA ONUT, -BRÄNNSTRÖM ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6214 ISBN 978-91-554-9887-0 UPPSALA urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-319639 2017 Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Lindhalsalen, EBC, Norbyvägen 14, Uppsala, Thursday, 1 June 2017 at 09:15 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Faculty examiner: Associate Professor Anne Pringle (University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Botany). Abstract Onuț-Brännström, I. 2017. The puzzle of lichen symbiosis. Pieces from Thamnolia. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 1503. 62 pp. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. ISBN 978-91-554-9887-0. Symbiosis brought important evolutionary novelties to life on Earth. Lichens, the symbiotic entities formed by fungi, photosynthetic organisms and bacteria, represent an example of a successful adaptation in surviving hostile environments. Yet many aspects of the lichen symbiosis remain unexplored. This thesis aims at bringing insights into lichen biology and the importance of symbiosis in adaptation. I am using as model system a successful colonizer of tundra and alpine environments, the worm lichens Thamnolia, which seem to only reproduce vegetatively through symbiotic propagules. When the genetic architecture of the mating locus of the symbiotic fungal partner was analyzed with genomic and transcriptomic data, a sexual self-incompatible life style was revealed. However, a screen of the mating types ratios across natural populations detected only one of the mating types, suggesting that Thamnolia has no potential for sexual reproduction because of lack of mating partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Lichenicolous Fungi and Lichenicolous Lichens of Svalbard, Including New Species, New Records and Revisions
    Herzogia 26 (2), 2013: 323 –359 323 Checklist of lichenicolous fungi and lichenicolous lichens of Svalbard, including new species, new records and revisions Mikhail P. Zhurbenko* & Wolfgang von Brackel Abstract: Zhurbenko, M. P. & Brackel, W. v. 2013. Checklist of lichenicolous fungi and lichenicolous lichens of Svalbard, including new species, new records and revisions. – Herzogia 26: 323 –359. Hainesia bryonorae Zhurb. (on Bryonora castanea), Lichenochora caloplacae Zhurb. (on Caloplaca species), Sphaerellothecium epilecanora Zhurb. (on Lecanora epibryon), and Trimmatostroma cetrariae Brackel (on Cetraria is- landica) are described as new to science. Forty four species of lichenicolous fungi (Arthonia apotheciorum, A. aspicili- ae, A. epiphyscia, A. molendoi, A. pannariae, A. peltigerina, Cercidospora ochrolechiae, C. trypetheliza, C. verrucosar- ia, Dacampia engeliana, Dactylospora aeruginosa, D. frigida, Endococcus fusiger, E. sendtneri, Epibryon conductrix, Epilichen glauconigellus, Lichenochora coppinsii, L. weillii, Lichenopeltella peltigericola, L. santessonii, Lichenostigma chlaroterae, L. maureri, Llimoniella vinosa, Merismatium decolorans, M. heterophractum, Muellerella atricola, M. erratica, Pronectria erythrinella, Protothelenella croceae, Skyttella mulleri, Sphaerellothecium parmeliae, Sphaeropezia santessonii, S. thamnoliae, Stigmidium cladoniicola, S. collematis, S. frigidum, S. leucophlebiae, S. mycobilimbiae, S. pseudopeltideae, Taeniolella pertusariicola, Tremella cetrariicola, Xenonectriella lutescens, X. ornamentata,
    [Show full text]
  • Australasian Lichenology Number 56, January 2005
    Australasian Lichenology Number 56, January 2005 Australasian Lichenology Number 56, January 2005 ISSN 1328-4401 The Austral Pannaria immixta c.olonizes rock, bark, and occasionally bryophytes in both shaded and well-lit humid lowlands. Its two most distinctive traits are its squamulose thallus and its gyrose apothecial discs. 1 mm c:::::===-­ CONTENTS NEWS Kantvilas, ~ack Elix awarded the Acharius medal at IAL5 2 BOOK REVIEW Galloway, DJ-The Lichen Hunters, by Oliver Gilbert (2004) 4 RECENT LITERATURE ON AUSTRALASIAN LICHENS 7 ADDITIONAL LICHEN RECORDS FROM AUSTRALIA Elix, JA; Lumbsch, HT (55)-Diploschistes conception is 8 ARTICLES Archer, AW-Australian species in the genus Diorygma (Graphidaceae) ....... 10 Elix, JA; Blanco, 0; Crespo, A-A new species of Flauoparmelia (Parmeliaceae, lichenized Ascomycota) from Western Australia ...... .... ............................ ...... 12 Galloway, DJ; Sancho, LG-Umbilicaria murihikuana and U. robusta (Umbili­ cariaceae: Ascomycota), two new taxa from Aotearoa New Zealand .. ... .. ..... 16 Elix, JA; Bawingan, PA; Lardizaval, M; Schumm, F-Anew species ofMenegazzia (Parmeliaceae, lichenized Ascomycota) and new records of Parmeliaceae from Papua New Guinea and the Philippines .................................. .. .................... 20 Malcolm, WM-'ITansfer ofDimerella rubrifusca to Coenogonium ........ ......... 25 Johnson, PN- Lichen succession near Arthur's Pass, New Zealand ............... 26 NEWS JACK ELIXAWARDED THE ACHARIUS MEDALAT IAL5 The recent Fifth Conference of the International Association for Lichenology (1AL5) in Tartu, Estonia, was a highly successful event, and most Australasian lichenologists will have the opportunity to read of its various academic achieve­ ments in other media*. The social programme included the traditionallAL Din­ ner, where, after many days of symposia, poster sessions, excursions, meetings and other lichenological events, conference delegates mingle informally and dust away their weariness over food and drink.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evolving Phylogenetically Based Taxonomy of Lichens and Allied Fungi
    Opuscula Philolichenum, 11: 4-10. 2012. *pdf available online 3January2012 via (http://sweetgum.nybg.org/philolichenum/) An evolving phylogenetically based taxonomy of lichens and allied fungi 1 BRENDAN P. HODKINSON ABSTRACT. – A taxonomic scheme for lichens and allied fungi that synthesizes scientific knowledge from a variety of sources is presented. The system put forth here is intended both (1) to provide a skeletal outline of the lichens and allied fungi that can be used as a provisional filing and databasing scheme by lichen herbarium/data managers and (2) to announce the online presence of an official taxonomy that will define the scope of the newly formed International Committee for the Nomenclature of Lichens and Allied Fungi (ICNLAF). The online version of the taxonomy presented here will continue to evolve along with our understanding of the organisms. Additionally, the subfamily Fissurinoideae Rivas Plata, Lücking and Lumbsch is elevated to the rank of family as Fissurinaceae. KEYWORDS. – higher-level taxonomy, lichen-forming fungi, lichenized fungi, phylogeny INTRODUCTION Traditionally, lichen herbaria have been arranged alphabetically, a scheme that stands in stark contrast to the phylogenetic scheme used by nearly all vascular plant herbaria. The justification typically given for this practice is that lichen taxonomy is too unstable to establish a reasonable system of classification. However, recent leaps forward in our understanding of the higher-level classification of fungi, driven primarily by the NSF-funded Assembling the Fungal Tree of Life (AFToL) project (Lutzoni et al. 2004), have caused the taxonomy of lichen-forming and allied fungi to increase significantly in stability. This is especially true within the class Lecanoromycetes, the main group of lichen-forming fungi (Miadlikowska et al.
    [Show full text]
  • One Hundred New Species of Lichenized Fungi: a Signature of Undiscovered Global Diversity
    Phytotaxa 18: 1–127 (2011) ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ Monograph PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2011 Magnolia Press ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) PHYTOTAXA 18 One hundred new species of lichenized fungi: a signature of undiscovered global diversity H. THORSTEN LUMBSCH1*, TEUVO AHTI2, SUSANNE ALTERMANN3, GUILLERMO AMO DE PAZ4, ANDRÉ APTROOT5, ULF ARUP6, ALEJANDRINA BÁRCENAS PEÑA7, PAULINA A. BAWINGAN8, MICHEL N. BENATTI9, LUISA BETANCOURT10, CURTIS R. BJÖRK11, KANSRI BOONPRAGOB12, MAARTEN BRAND13, FRANK BUNGARTZ14, MARCELA E. S. CÁCERES15, MEHTMET CANDAN16, JOSÉ LUIS CHAVES17, PHILIPPE CLERC18, RALPH COMMON19, BRIAN J. COPPINS20, ANA CRESPO4, MANUELA DAL-FORNO21, PRADEEP K. DIVAKAR4, MELIZAR V. DUYA22, JOHN A. ELIX23, ARVE ELVEBAKK24, JOHNATHON D. FANKHAUSER25, EDIT FARKAS26, LIDIA ITATÍ FERRARO27, EBERHARD FISCHER28, DAVID J. GALLOWAY29, ESTER GAYA30, MIREIA GIRALT31, TREVOR GOWARD32, MARTIN GRUBE33, JOSEF HAFELLNER33, JESÚS E. HERNÁNDEZ M.34, MARÍA DE LOS ANGELES HERRERA CAMPOS7, KLAUS KALB35, INGVAR KÄRNEFELT6, GINTARAS KANTVILAS36, DOROTHEE KILLMANN28, PAUL KIRIKA37, KERRY KNUDSEN38, HARALD KOMPOSCH39, SERGEY KONDRATYUK40, JAMES D. LAWREY21, ARMIN MANGOLD41, MARCELO P. MARCELLI9, BRUCE MCCUNE42, MARIA INES MESSUTI43, ANDREA MICHLIG27, RICARDO MIRANDA GONZÁLEZ7, BIBIANA MONCADA10, ALIFERETI NAIKATINI44, MATTHEW P. NELSEN1, 45, DAG O. ØVSTEDAL46, ZDENEK PALICE47, KHWANRUAN PAPONG48, SITTIPORN PARNMEN12, SERGIO PÉREZ-ORTEGA4, CHRISTIAN PRINTZEN49, VÍCTOR J. RICO4, EIMY RIVAS PLATA1, 50, JAVIER ROBAYO51, DANIA ROSABAL52, ULRIKE RUPRECHT53, NORIS SALAZAR ALLEN54, LEOPOLDO SANCHO4, LUCIANA SANTOS DE JESUS15, TAMIRES SANTOS VIEIRA15, MATTHIAS SCHULTZ55, MARK R. D. SEAWARD56, EMMANUËL SÉRUSIAUX57, IMKE SCHMITT58, HARRIE J. M. SIPMAN59, MOHAMMAD SOHRABI 2, 60, ULRIK SØCHTING61, MAJBRIT ZEUTHEN SØGAARD61, LAURENS B. SPARRIUS62, ADRIANO SPIELMANN63, TOBY SPRIBILLE33, JUTARAT SUTJARITTURAKAN64, ACHRA THAMMATHAWORN65, ARNE THELL6, GÖRAN THOR66, HOLGER THÜS67, EINAR TIMDAL68, CAMILLE TRUONG18, ROMAN TÜRK69, LOENGRIN UMAÑA TENORIO17, DALIP K.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 2 – Fruticose Species
    Appendix 5.2-1 Vegetation Technical Appendix APPENDIX 5.2‐1 Vegetation Technical Appendix Contents Section Page Ecological Land Classification ............................................................................................................ A5.2‐1‐1 Geodatabase Development .............................................................................................. A5.2‐1‐1 Vegetation Community Mapping ..................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐1 Quality Assurance and Quality Control ............................................................................ A5.2‐1‐3 Limitations of Ecological Land Classification .................................................................... A5.2‐1‐3 Field Data Collection ......................................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐3 Supplementary Results ..................................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐4 Rare Vegetation Species and Rare Ecological Communities ........................................................... A5.2‐1‐10 Supplementary Desktop Results ..................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐10 Field Methods ................................................................................................................. A5.2‐1‐16 Supplementary Results ................................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐17 Weed Species
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY
    Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY Ackerfield, J., and J. Wen. 2002. A morphometric analysis of Hedera L. (the ivy genus, Araliaceae) and its taxonomic implications. Adansonia 24: 197-212. Adams, P. 1961. Observations on the Sagittaria subulata complex. Rhodora 63: 247-265. Adams, R.M. II, and W.J. Dress. 1982. Nodding Lilium species of eastern North America (Liliaceae). Baileya 21: 165-188. Adams, R.P. 1986. Geographic variation in Juniperus silicicola and J. virginiana of the Southeastern United States: multivariant analyses of morphology and terpenoids. Taxon 35: 31-75. ------. 1995. Revisionary study of Caribbean species of Juniperus (Cupressaceae). Phytologia 78: 134-150. ------, and T. Demeke. 1993. Systematic relationships in Juniperus based on random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs). Taxon 42: 553-571. Adams, W.P. 1957. A revision of the genus Ascyrum (Hypericaceae). Rhodora 59: 73-95. ------. 1962. Studies in the Guttiferae. I. A synopsis of Hypericum section Myriandra. Contr. Gray Herbarium Harv. 182: 1-51. ------, and N.K.B. Robson. 1961. A re-evaluation of the generic status of Ascyrum and Crookea (Guttiferae). Rhodora 63: 10-16. Adams, W.P. 1973. Clusiaceae of the southeastern United States. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 89: 62-71. Adler, L. 1999. Polygonum perfoliatum (mile-a-minute weed). Chinquapin 7: 4. Aedo, C., J.J. Aldasoro, and C. Navarro. 1998. Taxonomic revision of Geranium sections Batrachioidea and Divaricata (Geraniaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 594-630. Affolter, J.M. 1985. A monograph of the genus Lilaeopsis (Umbelliferae). Systematic Bot. Monographs 6. Ahles, H.E., and A.E.
    [Show full text]