An Invisible Problem

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Invisible Problem Plastic in the deep: an invisible problem How the seafloor becomes a plastic trap 2 Plastic in the deep: Plastic in the deep: 3 an invisible problem an invisible problem © OCEANA / Carlos Suárez 1. Executive summary Contents Most marine debris remains hidden in the 1. Executive summary 3 depths where, year after year, currents 2. An invisible problem: Plastic traps 4 increase the concentration of waste, including Submarine canyons 6 macroplastics. Many estimates have been made of how long it takes for different plastic Escarpments 8 objects to degrade, but these approximations Pockmarks 9 mainly relate to surface water. Seamounts and reefs 10 They are not valid for the deep seas, as these Depressions 12 environments are characterised by a lack Submarine caves and other structures 13 of sunlight, low temperatures, and limited The deep sea 14 erosion. For this reason, marine debris can 3. The ecological vulnerability of plastic traps 16 disrupt these ecosystems for centuries before it eventually degrades. 4. Oceana’s recommendations 18 5. References 20 Much of Europe’s waters are deep. Canyons, seamounts, escarpments, and reefs trap plastics, while simultaneously Credits act as biodiversity hotspots. Observations Suggested citation: Aguilar, R., Marín, P., Álvarez, H., Blanco J., Sánchez, N. Plastic in the deep: made during Oceana’s expeditions show an invisible problem. How the seafloor becomes a plastic trap. Oceana, Madrid, 24 pp. accumulations of single-use plastics in areas of DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3992717 high biological value, abandoned fishing gear in The deep sea, Text: Ricardo Aguilar, Natividad Sánchez, Pilar Marín, Helena Álvarez the middle of the ocean, and half buried sheets Geographic Information Systems: Jorge Blanco an oasis for marine life of plastic hundreds of metres below the surface. Review: Allison Perry, Vera Coelho The deep seafloor has traditionally Editorial Support: Ángeles Sáez, Irene Campmany Very often, recovering this debris is technically been described as an oasis for life Design: Yago Yuste and economically unfeasible, either because Cover photo: Balloon and plastic bottle at a depth of more than 500 m in Sidon, Lebanon. or a biodiversity hotspot, due to the it is located at a great depth or because it enormous abundance and richness 1,2 All photos are © OCEANA unless specified otherwise in the caption. The information contained in this report may is snagged on fragile biological structures. of species that inhabit this area. be reproduced provided that © OCEANA is acknowledged as the source. Therefore, to reduce the damage, it is essential The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of OCEANA and the opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the official position of the European Commission. The European Commission is not responsible to drastically reduce the everyday use of This zone is of particular importance for any use that may be made of the information contained in this document. plastic and avoid its uncontrolled dumping. for marine biological diversity and, Oceana calls on all social agents to reduce in fact, many species use deep sea the irrational use of plastic and implement an environments as spawning, nursery, ambitious regulatory framework that responds breeding, or feeding grounds. decisively to one of the greatest challenges Canyons and seamounts house posed by debris and plastic in the marine emblematic species, from corals to environment: the pollution of the deep sea. cetaceans and sharks. 4 Plastic in the deep: Plastic in the deep: 5 an invisible problem an invisible problem Abundance of certain geohabitats in the Northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean. Source: 2. An invisible problem: Plastic traps Seamounts Escarpments Esri, Digital Globe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Submarine canyons The deep sea Most of what is known or assumed about The vast majority of these marine plastic in the oceans comes from coastal expanses have scarcely been studied, and observations. However, analysing the often scientists find that the litter arrived litter collected on beaches barely hints at before they did. In fact, it is estimated the magnitude of what lies hidden at the that only 1% of plastics are in surface bottom of the sea. waters, and the majority of the remaining 99% ends up in the deep sea3. For fifteen years, Oceana has been using an underwater robot (ROV, Remotely Due to their morphology, some geological Operated Vehicle) to document European formations concentrate marine debris. As and Mediterranean waters up to a thousand can be seen on the map on this page, these metres deep. Debris has been a constant are widely distributed habitats. on virtually every dive, excluding in certain areas where strong currents carry the litter Below, we detail some of these cases that far from the shore. are transforming from biodiversity hotspots to underwater landfills. From an ecological point of view, deep waters are considered to be 200 metres or more below sea level, where the influence of light begins to disappear. This depth is reached very close to the coastline in some regions, but in this report, we also demonstrate that marine plastics have been found at great distances from inhabited areas. The vast majority of these marine expanses have scarcely been studied, and often scientists find that the litter arrived before they did”. 6 Plastic in the deep: Plastic in the deep: 7 an invisible problem an invisible problem Submarine canyons -434 m 1:20000 500 1.000 m 0.25 0.5 nm Some submarine canyons, such as the Capbreton Canyon (France), are the extension St. Vincent Canyon, Portugal of rivers. This makes it easier for waste to reach the open sea and great depths. Sampling in the St. Vincent Canyon (Portugal)14 estimated an average of 1.67 objects per hectare, with Source: National Geographic, Esri. HERE, UNEP-WCMC, USGS, NASA, ESA, METI, NRCAN, GERCO, NOAA, INCREMENT P.CORP. concentrations exceeding 300 objects in some locations. These underwater structures are, in some Around 15% of the world’s submarine In Europe, the case of the Mediterranean cases, associated with existing or former canyons start close to the coast, is particularly worrying, as in some terrestrial rivers, and represent their increasing the amount of sediments and submarine canyons the concentrations of continuation onto the seafloor. anthropogenic waste they receive, and waste reach staggering figures. In certain The Mediterranean holds In general, canyons tend to originate as a facilitate the transport of plastics and canyons along the coast of Catalonia, result of erosion by water and transported other waste to the seafloor.12 concentrations of marine litter have been the submarine canyons with sediments, which generate valleys of estimated as being between 1,500 and the highest concentration of varying depths. In other cases, they have 15,000 objects per square kilometre, with plastics in Europe. been attributed to factors such as mud a maximum of 167,540 in one particular flows, landslides, subsidence, or glacial location. Of the items found, the majority activity, among others.4,5,6 (72%) were plastics.8 Recent studies have shown the important role rivers play in transporting plastics 42% Plastics from the land to the sea.7 Like land-based valleys, submarine canyons collect, channel, 16% and accumulate, meaning a great deal of Fishing gear waste ends up reaching the canyons and building up in large quantities. From these A study of fifteen canyons in the -610 m areas this debris is then transported to Bay of Biscay found litter in all the deep sea.8,9,10 This high concentration of them, with plastics (42%) and of waste is also influenced by the strong fishing gear (16%) being the most currents that can occur in the upper zone commonly encountered objects. Much of this fishing gear was of these geological formations.11 also plastic, including gill nets, trawl nets, and longlines.13 Batrun, Lebanon In other canyons, such as those in Lebanon (Jounieh, Batrun, Beirut, and Sidon) the concentrations of domestic waste far exceed the densities found in the St. Vincent Canyon. It is not known how long it takes for plastic to degrade at great depth. 8 Plastic in the deep: Plastic in the deep: 9 an invisible problem an invisible problem -500 m -541 m Escarpments Pockmarks Émile Baudot Escarpment, Balearic Islands Mallorca Channel, Balearic Islands Where there are no submarine canyons to Pockmarks are crater-shaped formations It is increasingly common to see commercial Forkbeard (Phycis sp.) next to plastics transport the waste, it reaches the deep species like this forkbeard (Phycis sp.) among formed by gases escaping through the between the Ausias March and sea via escarpments15,16, in the same way as agglomerations of urban debris. Recycled or not, submarine crust.20,21,22 Ses Olives seamounts. coastal runoff. plastic invades the depths. Their concave shape means they become These underwater cliffs result from traps for waste carried by marine currents various tectonic, geological, and erosional which, once deposited, is difficult processes. They can be interrupted by to remove. valleys and canyons, which increase their complexity.15,17,18 Many of these cliffs may have small platforms or terraces19 at different depths that retain some of the sediment and debris that would otherwise end up in the deeps. Pockmark plastic trap diagram Large concentrations of plastics can be seen in these places. Scanner, United Kingdom. Escarpment plastic trap diagram Plastics in the Scanner marine conservation area (North Sea). 10 Plastic in the deep: Plastic in the deep: 11 an invisible problem an invisible problem -30 m -323 m Seamounts and reefs Sa Creu Cape, Balearic Islands Abubacer Ridge, Alboran Sea The Single-Use Plastics Directive requires fishing gear manufacturers to defray the costs of awareness- Submarine rises are oases of life.
Recommended publications
  • Downloaded 09/27/21 09:22 PM UTC 1874 JOURNAL of PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY VOLUME 28
    OCTOBER 1998 PETRUNCIO ET AL. 1873 Observations of the Internal Tide in Monterey Canyon EMIL T. P ETRUNCIO,* LESLIE K. ROSENFELD, AND JEFFREY D. PADUAN Department of Oceanography, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California (Manuscript received 19 May 1997, in ®nal form 8 December 1997) ABSTRACT Data from two shipboard experiments in 1994, designed to observe the semidiurnal internal tide in Monterey Canyon, reveal semidiurnal currents of about 20 cm s21, which is an order of magnitude larger than the estimated barotropic tidal currents. The kinetic and potential energy (evidenced by isopycnal displacements of about 50 m) was greatest along paths following the characteristics calculated from linear theory. These energy ray paths are oriented nearly parallel to the canyon ¯oor and may originate from large bathymetric features beyond the mouth of Monterey Bay. Energy propagated shoreward during the April experiment (ITEX1), whereas a standing wave, that is, an internal seiche, was observed in October (ITEX2). The difference is attributed to changes in strati®cation between the two experiments. Higher energy levels were present during ITEX1, which took place near the spring phase of the fortnightly (14.8 days) cycle in sea level, while ITEX2 occurred close to the neap phase. Further evidence of phase-locking between the surface and internal tides comes from monthlong current and temperature records obtained near the canyon head in 1991. The measured ratio of kinetic to potential energy during both ITEX1 and ITEX2 was only half that predicted by linear theory for freely propagating internal waves, probably a result of the constraining effects of topography. Internal tidal energy dissipation rate estimates for ITEX1 range from 1.3 3 1024 to 2.3 3 1023 Wm23, depending on assumptions made about the effect of canyon shape on dissipation.
    [Show full text]
  • Burton 2013 Cultural History of Davidson Seamount
    Cultural History of Davidson Seamount: A Characterization of Mapping, Research, and Fishing Erica J. Burton Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary Technical Report August 2013 Cultural History of Davidson Seamount MBNMS Technical Report COVER IMAGES Top left: Davidson Seamount, the first undersea feature to be officially termed a seamount by the U.S. Board on Geographic Names. This feature was surveyed by the C&GS in 1933 and named in honor of the great Coast Survey West Coast pioneer George Davidson, 1825-1911. Latitude should range from 35 to 36 degrees. Image Credit: NOAA Central Library Historical Collection (NOAA Photo Library) and original chart credit: Association of Commissioned Officers (1933). Top right: George Davidson (circa 1883). Credit: NOAA, B.A. Colonna Album (NOAA Photo Library) Bottom: Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute’s ROV Tiburon. Credit: T. Trejo for NOAA. SUGGESTED CITATION Burton, E.J. 2013. Cultural History of Davidson Seamount: A Characterization of Mapping, Research, and Fishing. MBNMS Technical Report, 21 p. 2 Cultural History of Davidson Seamount MBNMS Technical Report TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................4 MAPPING ................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 RESEARCH AND MONITORING ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biologic and Geologic Characteristics of Cold Seeps in Monterey Bay, California
    Deep-Ser Research I, Vol. 43, No. 1 I-12, pp. 1739-1762, 1996 Pergamon Copyright 0 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd Primed in Great Britain. All rights reserved PII: SO967-0637(96)0007~1 0967-0637/96 Sl5.00+0.00 Biologic and geologic characteristics of cold seeps in Monterey Bay, California JAMES P. BARRY,* H. GARY GREENE,*? DANIEL L. ORANGE,* CHARLES H. BAXTER,* BRUCE H. ROBISON,* RANDALL E. KOCHEVAR,* JAMES W. NYBAKKEN,? DONALD L. REEDS and CECILIA M. McHUGHg (Received 12 June 1995; in revisedform 12 March 1996; accepted 26 May 1996) Abstract-Cold seep communities discovered at three previously unknown sites between 600 and 1000 m in Monterey Bay, California, are dominated by chemoautotrophic bacteria (Beggiatoa sp.) and vesicomyid clams (5 sp.). Other seep-associated fauna included galatheid crabs (Munidopsis sp.), vestimentiferan worms (LameNibrachia barhaml?), solemyid clams (Solemya sp.),columbellid snails (Mitrellapermodesta, Amphissa sp.),and pyropeltid limpets (Pyropelta sp.). More than 50 species of regional (i.e. non-seep) benthic fauna were also observed at seeps. Ratios of stable carbon isotopes (S13C) in clam tissues near - 36%0indicate sulfur-oxidizing chemosynthetic production, rather than non-seep food sources, as their principal trophic pathway. The “Mt Crushmore” cold seep site is located in a vertically faulted and fractured region of the Pliocene Purisima Formation along the walls of Monterey Canyon (Y 635 m), where seepage appears to derive from sulfide-rich fluids within the Purisima Formation. The “Clam Field” cold seep site, also in Monterey Canyon (_ 900 m) is located near outcrops in the hydrocarbon-bearing Monterey Formation.
    [Show full text]
  • MBARI Announces Construction of New State-Of-The-Art Research Ship, R/V David Packard
    ! EMBARGOED UNTIL APRIL 20, 2021, 9:00 a.m. PDT/12:00 p.m. EDT MBARI Media Contact: Raúl Nava, [email protected] MBARI announces construction of new state-of-the-art research ship, R/V David Packard MOSS LANDING, California—The Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (MBARI) is embarking on a new chapter in its ocean research with the construction of a state-of- the-art ship. The new research vessel will be named in honor of MBARI’s founder, David Packard. The R/V David Packard will be capable of accommodating diverse expeditions in Monterey Bay and beyond to further the institute’s mission to explore and understand our changing ocean. The R/V David Packard will be 50 meters (164 feet) long and 12.8 meters (42 feet) wide with a draft of 3.7 meters (12 feet). It will support a crew of 12, plus a science crew of 18. MBARI has selected Freire Shipyard in Vigo, Spain, for the construction of the R/V David Packard. “MBARI’s mission to explore and understand the ocean is more important than ever, especially in light of the growing threats of climate change, overfishing, and pollution,” said Chris Scholin, MBARI President and Chief Executive Officer. “This new state-of- the-art research vessel will expand MBARI’s reach and enhance our research, engineering development, and outreach efforts.” For over three decades, MBARI research has revealed the astounding diversity of life deep beneath the surface, and the institute’s technology innovations have provided priceless insights into the ocean’s geological, ecological, and biogeochemical processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Davidson Seamount Management Zone
    Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary Davidson Seamount Management Zone Management Plan Living Document June 2013 version 6.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................... 1 GOAL ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 CHARACTERISTICS OF SEAMOUNTS AND THE DAVIDSON SEAMOUNT MANAGEMENT ZONE ...................................... 1 NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF DAVIDSON SEAMOUNT ................................................................................................. 3 POTENTIAL THREATS TO THE DAVIDSON SEAMOUNT ................................................................................................ 4 EXPANSION OF THE MBNMS TO INCLUDE DAVIDSON SEAMOUNT MANAGEMENT ZONE ......................................... 5 ACTION PLAN STATUS – STRATEGIES, ACTIVITIES, AND PARTNERS ................................................... 6 STRATEGY DS-1: CONDUCT SITE CHARACTERIZATION ............................................................................................. 6 STRATEGY DS-2: CONDUCT ECOLOGICAL PROCESSES INVESTIGATIONS ................................................................... 9 STRATEGY DS-3: DEVELOP
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Monitoring of Mixed Sand and Mud Sediment in the Nearshore Area of Santa Cruz, California a Preliminary Assessmen
    MONITORING OF DREDGED UPPER SANTA CRUZ HARBOR MIXED SAND AND MUD SEDIMENT RELEASED INTO THE NEARSHORE AREA OF SANTA CRUZ, CALIFORNIA Report prepared by; Steve G. Watt and H.G. Greene Center for Habitat Studies Moss Landing Marine Laboratories (831) 771-4140 December 19, 2002 Monitoring of dredged upper Santa Cruz Harbor mixed sand and mud sediment released into the nearshore area of Santa Cruz, California Prepared by: Steve Watt and Dr. H.G. Greene Center for Habitat Studies Moss Landing Marine Laboratories 8272 Moss Landing Road Moss Landing, CA 95039 (831) 771-4140 December 19, 2001 Prepared for: the Santa Cruz Harbor Port District 135 Fifth Avenue Santa Cruz, CA 95062 and the California Department of Boating and Waterways Table of Contents List of Figures…………………………………………………………………ii List of Tables…………………………………………………………………iii Executive Summary…………………………………………………………..1 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………...2 2. Local Geologic and Climatic Setting…………………………………………4 3. Oceanographic Conditions……………………………….……………………7 4. Santa Cruz Littoral Cell……………………………………………………….8 5. Marine Biological Assessment……………………………………………….11 6. Methods………………………………………………………………………12 6.1 Scientific Literature Review……………………………………..………12 6.2 Monitoring Program…………………………………………………….13 6.3 San Lorenzo River……………………………………………………….14 6.4 Santa Cruz Harbor………………………………………………………16 6.5 Oceanographic Data…………………………………………………….17 6.6 Sediment & Water Sampling……………………………………………..19 6.6.1 Onshore Sample Collection……………………………………19 6.6.2 Offshore Sample Collection……………………………..…….23
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B: Geotechnical Investigations
    September Ranch Subdivision Project Draft REIR Appendix B: Geotechnical Investigations Michael Brandman Associates H:\Client (PN-JN)\2137\21370002\DREIR Dec 2004\21370002_Appendix_Slips.doc GEOLOGIC, SOILS AND DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT SEPTEMBER RANCH CARMEL VALLEY MONTEREY COUNTY, CALIFORNIA For Preparation of a Revised Environmental Impact Report To The County Of Monterey Planning and Inspection Department Prepared For: Michael Brandman Associates 415 Linden Way Pleasanton, California 94556 Attention: Mr. Jason Brandman Project Manager Copyright 2003 Kleinfelder, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This document was prepared for use only by Michael Brandman Associates and members of the project design team only for the purposes stated and within a reasonable time from its issuance. Please read the "Limitations" section of this report. Unauthorized use or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. See “Application for Authorization to Use” located at the end of this document if use or copying is desired by anyone other than those indicated for the project identified above. June 30, 2003 24236 (SJO3R272) mnc June 30, 2003 File: 24236/Geol Mr. Jason Brandman Michael Brandman Associates 415 Linden Way Pleasanton, California 94556 SUBJECT: Geologic, Soils and Drainage Assessment for the September Ranch Project, Carmel Valley, Monterey County, California. Dear Mr. Brandman: Kleinfelder is pleased to submit our geologic, soils and drainage assessment report for the September Ranch project in Monterey County, California. The accompanying report summarizes the results of our field investigation, data collection and review, and geologic interpretation. Recent geologic history recorded in the rocks and sediments in the vicinity of September Ranch is complex and subject to multiple interpretations. Possible deformation and uplift of Holocene deposits, active faulting and a complex fluvial history of the Carmel River add to the complexity of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biogeography and Distribution of Megafauna at Three California Seamounts
    The Biogeography and Distribution of Megafauna at Three California Seamounts A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Moss Landing Marine Laboratories California State University Monterey Bay In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science By Lonny J. Lundsten December 2007 ©2007 Lonny Lundsten All Rights Reserved 2 Approved for Moss Landing Marine Laboratories _________________________________________________ Dr. Jonathon Geller, Moss Landing Marine Laboratories _________________________________________________ Dr. Gregor M. Cailliet, Moss Landing Marine Laboratories _________________________________________________ Dr. James Barry, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute _________________________________________________ Dr. David Clague, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute 3 Table of Contents Abstract........................................................................................................... 5 Introduction..................................................................................................... 6 Methods........................................................................................................ 11 Results.......................................................................................................... 15 Discussion.................................................................................................... 25 Acknowledgements...................................................................................... 33 Literature Cited............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • California Seafloor Mapping Program Central Coast Marine Protected Areas Contents Central Coast MPA’S SMCA SMR
    California Seafloor Mapping Program Central Coast Marine Protected Areas Contents Central Coast MPA’s SMCA SMR Año Nuevo SMCA 6-7 Greyhound Rock SMCA Soquel Canyon SMCA 8-9 California Seafloor Mapping Program 4-5 Portugese Ledge SMCA & Central Coast MPA’s Edward F. Ricketts SMCA California MPA network design 26-27 Lovers Point SMR Pacific Grove Marine Gardens SMCA California MPA raw data 28-29 10-11 Asilomar SMR Acknowledgemnts 30-31 Carmel Pinnacles SMR Carmel Bay SMCA Pt. Lobos SMCA/SMR 12-13 Pt. Sur SMCA/SMR 14-15 Big Creek SMCA/SMR 16-17 California Central Coast Marine Protected Areas Piedras Blancas SMCA/SMR 18-19 Cambria SMCA White Rock Cambria SMCA 20-21 Pt. Buchon SMCA/SMR 22-23 Vandenberg SMR 24-25 0 25 km 50 km “…and some rin up hill and down dale, knapping the chucky stanes to pieces wi’ hammers, like sa mony road-makers run daft. They say ‘tis to see how the world was made!” Sir Walter Scott, St.Ronan’s Well, 1824 energy, as well as the basemap for applied and basic 24-25). Following the maps we have highlighted complex mosaic of diverse physical features. This research; the driving force behind the CSMP has some recent advances in science using CSMP data new knowledge is providing the foundation for been California’s Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) to understand how habitats are used by biological improved understanding and management of the rich and its mandate to create the nation’s first Marine communities (pages 28-31). diversity of marine habitats, species and ecosystems Protected Area (MPA) network.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruiz Capstone03.Pdf
    An understanding of the general geomorphology and processes occurring in the Monterey Bay Submarine Canyon A Capstone Project Presented to the Faculty of Earth Systems Science and Policy In the Center for Science, Technology and Information Resources At California State University, Monterey Bay In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science By Genoveva Ruiz May 2003 ESSP Faculty, Science is the constant task of trying to understand the complexities and patterns of earth's intricate systems. A comprehension of the earth’s natural processes and cycles allows scientists to synchronize anthropogenic activity with climatic activity. The Moss Landing harbor, which sits above the head of the Monterey Bay Canyon, is a prime example of the need to understand earth's cycles. Since the construction of the harbor in 1946 an eminent need for dredging of the mud and sediment that buries the harbor has existed. If the harbor was never constructed or had been fully completed to prevent the need of dredging in the harbor, the sediment would just flow into the canyon. Instead, the dredge fills the harbor creating costly problems for the Moss Landing District because it is considered toxic according to EPA standards preventing it from being dumped directly down the canyon. Many environmentalists and scientists alike believe that the dumping of toxic substances is never a solution and that other means of removal should be used on the dredge. The scientists at Moss Landing Marine Labs (MLML) and Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (MBARI) believe the proximity of the canyon, the presence of colonizing benthic communities, and sediment-flushing events make the Monterey Bay a perfect candidate for dredging.
    [Show full text]
  • Carmel Bay : Oceanographic Dynamics and Nutrient Transport in a Small Embayment of the Central California Coast
    California State University, Monterey Bay Digital Commons @ CSUMB Capstone Projects and Master's Theses 2009 Carmel Bay : oceanographic dynamics and nutrient transport in a small embayment of the central California coast Dustin Carroll California State University, Monterey Bay Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/caps_thes Recommended Citation Carroll, Dustin, "Carmel Bay : oceanographic dynamics and nutrient transport in a small embayment of the central California coast" (2009). Capstone Projects and Master's Theses. 69. https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/caps_thes/69 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ CSUMB. It has been accepted for inclusion in Capstone Projects and Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ CSUMB. Unless otherwise indicated, this project was conducted as practicum not subject to IRB review but conducted in keeping with applicable regulatory guidance for training purposes. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1.1 Carmel Bay Carmel Bay is a small embayment located on the central coast of California. The mouth of the bay faces directly westward and is exposed to open ocean coastal California Current conditions; however, it is also possibly influenced by smaller scale topographic effects such as wind and wave sheltering (Figure 1). Carmel Bay also has a unique bathymetric gradient, as the Carmel Submarine Canyon is located within close proximity to the near-shore environment within the bay. At the south end of Carmel Bay, the 100-m isobath is located ~ 500 m from shore. Stillwater Cove is a small semi-enclosed basin located directly inside of Carmel Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.1 Surface Water Resources
    4. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 4.1 Surface Water Resources 4.1.1 Introduction This section presents the existing surface water conditions and the applicable regulations on the federal, state, and local levels. The section evaluates potential impacts from construction and operation of the Moss Landing Project and the North Marina Project on surface water resources including fresh, estuarine, and marine water bodies within and adjacent to the project area. Section 4.1.2 presents the environmental setting related to surface hydrology, water quality, and flooding. Section 4.1.3 provides federal, state, and local regulations that would apply to the Moss Landing Project and North Marina Project. Section 4.1.4 describes the project impacts and identifies mitigation measures to minimize any potentially significant impacts. Refer to Section 4.2, Groundwater Resources, for groundwater-related impacts and Section 4.3, Marine Biological Resources, for impacts to biological resources in marine waters from the project- related discharges. 4.1.2 Environmental Setting The project area spans portions of several cities (i.e., Castroville, Marina, Sand City, Seaside, Del Rey Oaks, Monterey, and Pacific Grove) and unincorporated areas of Monterey County. The climate in the project area is moderate year-round with warm, dry summers and cool, moist winters. The average temperature is approximately 59 degrees Fahrenheit (Monterey County, 2007). Rainfall occurs primarily between November and April. The average rainfall in the county varies, but is approximately 18 inches per year. The project area lies within Monterey County, in the southern portion of the Coast Ranges geomorphic province. Topographic features in the basin are dominated by a rugged seacoast and three parallel ranges of the Southern Coast Mountains - the Diablo, Gabilan, and Santa Lucia Ranges, which have peaks of up to 5,844 feet above mean sea level (amsl).
    [Show full text]