Mineralogic Notes Series 3

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mineralogic Notes Series 3 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY . GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Bulletin 610 MINERALOGIC NOTES SERIES 3 BY WALDEMAR T. SCHALLER WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1916 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction................................................................ 9 Koechlinite (bismuth molybdate), a new mineral............................ 10 Origin of investigation................................................... 10 Nomenclature......................................................... 10 Locality............................................................... 11 Paragenesis........................................................... 11 Crystallography........'............................................... 14 General character of crystals....................................... 14 Calculation of elements............................................. 14 Forms and angles................................................. 15 Combinations..................................................... 19 < Zonal relations and markings...................................... 19 Habits........................................................... 21 Twinning........................................................ 23 Measured crystals................................................. 26 Etch figures...................................................... 27o Intergrowths........................................................ 31 Relation to other minerals.......................................... 31 Physical properties.................................................... 32 Optical properties...................................................... 32 Chemical properties.................................................... 33 Pyrognostics...................................................... 33 Quantitative composition.......................................... 33 Diagnostic properties................................................... 34 Inyoite and meyerhofferite, two new calcium borates......................... 35 Relation of meyerhofferite to inyoite................................... 35 Nomenclature......................................................... 36 Locality and paragenesis.......................'....................... 36 Inyoite............................................................... 37 Crystallography................................................... 37 General character of crystals................................... 37 Calculation of elements......................................... 37 Forms......................................................... 38 Physical properties................................................ 38 Optical properties.................................................. 38 Chemical properties...............................................: 39 Pyrognostics.................................................. 39 Quantitative composition...................................... 39 Alteration.................................................... 40 Diagnostic properties............................................... 40 Meyerhofferite............... ......................................... 41 Crystallography................................................... 41 General character of crystals................................... 41 Calculation of elements......................................... 41 Forms and angles............................................. 45 3 4 . CONTENTS. Inyoite and meyerhofferite, two new calcium borates Continued. Meyerhofferite Continued. Crystallography Continued. Page. Combinations................................................. 48 Zonal relations................................................. 50 Habits....................................................... 50 Measured crystals............................................. 52 Physical properties................................................ 53 Optical properties.................................................. 54 Chemical properties................................................ 54 Pyrognostics.................................................. 54 Quantitative composition...................................... 54 Synthesis....................................................... 55 Diagnostic properties. v............................................ 55 Lucinite, a new mineral: a dimorphous form of variscite ..................... 56 Origin of investigation................................................. 56 Nomenclature and locality............................................. 56 Paragenesis........................................................... 56 Crystallography....................................................... 57 General character of crystals....................................... .57 Calculation of elements............................................. 58 Forms and angles................................................. 59 Combinations..................................................... 61 Zonal relations..................................................... 61 Habits........................................................... 61 Measured crystals................................................. 62 Relation to other minerals......................................... 64 Physical properties.................................................... 66 Optical properties...................................................... 67 Chemical properties.................................................... 67 Diagnostic properties.................................................. 68 The crystallography of variscite............................................. 69 Previous description.......................... i........................ 69 General character of crystals........................................... 69 Calculation of elements................................................. 69 Forms and angles.......:............................................. 71 Combinations......................................................... 73 Zonal relations......................................................... 73 Habits...... ; ........................................................ 73 Twinning.............................................................. 77 Relation to variscite crystals from Arkansas............................. 78 Schneebergite............................................................. 81 Origin of investigation................................................. 81 Historical sketch....................................................... 82 Bibliography......................................................... 85 Paragenesis........................................................... 86 Crystallography....................................................... 90 Physical properties.................................................... 91 Optical properties...................................................... 91 Chemical properties.................................................... 91 Pyrognostics...................................................... 91 Homogeneity of sample analyzed................................... 91 Analytical methods used........................................... 92 Quantitative composition. .......................................... 93 CONTENTS. Romeite........................... ..........................' .:............ 95 Origin of investigation................................................. 95 Historical sketch....................................................... 95 Bibliography......................................................... 96 Paragenesis........................................................... 96 Crystallography....................................................... 97 Physical properties.................................:.................. 98 Optical properties...................................................... 98 Chemical properties.................................................... 99 Pyrognostics...................................................... 99 Quantitative composition.......................................... 99 The natural antimonites and antimonates..........\......................... 104 Velardenite, a new member of the melilite group............................ 106 The melilite group........................................................ 109 Historical sketch..................................................... 1. 109 Review of old theories............................................. 109 Characteristics of the melilite group. ................................. 110 New theory............................................................ Ill Primary compounds................................................ Ill Natural anhydrous calcium-aluminum silicates.................. Ill Sarcolite...................................................... 113 Soda sarcolite.................................................. 115 JLkennanite.................................................. 116 Velardenite................................................... 117 Summary of properties of primary compounds................... 117 Isomorphous mixtures of two or more of the primary compounds...... 118 Composition of the mixtures........................................ 126 The composition of cebollite............................................... 129 The crystallography of thaumasite.......................................... 131 The chemical composition of tremolite...................................... 133 New occurrences of some rare minerals....................................
Recommended publications
  • Fall 2016 Gems & Gemology
    FALL 2016 VOLUME LII THE UARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE GEMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA Review of CVD Synthetic Diamonds Reversible Color Alteration of Blue Zircon Sapphires from the Russian Far East Grandidierite from Madagascar Editorial Staff Editor-in-Chief Editors, Lab Notes Contributing Editors Duncan Pay Thomas M. Moses James E. Shigley gia.edu/gems-gemology [email protected] Shane F. McClure Andy Lucas Donna Beaton Subscriptions Managing Editor Editors, Micro-World Copies of the current issue may be purchased for Stuart D. Overlin Nathan Renfro Editor-in-Chief Emeritus $29.95 plus shipping. Subscriptions are $79.99 for one [email protected] Elise A. Skalwold Alice S. Keller year (4 issues) in the U.S. and $99.99 elsewhere. Cana- John I. Koivula dian subscribers should add GST. Discounts are avail- Editor Customer Service able for group subscriptions, GIA alumni, and current Jennifer-Lynn Archuleta Editors, Gem News Martha Erickson GIA students. To purchase print subscriptions, visit [email protected] (760) 603-4502 store.gia.edu or contact Customer Service. For insti- Emmanuel Fritsch tutional rates, contact Customer Service. [email protected] Technical Editors Gagan Choudhary Tao Z. Hsu Christopher M. Breeding Database Coverage Gems & Gemology’s impact factor is 0.394, accord- [email protected] Editorial Assistants ing to the 2015 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Jennifer Stone-Sundberg Brooke Goedert Reports (issued July 2016). G&G is abstracted in Erin Hogarth Thomson Reuters products (Current Contents: Phys- ical, Chemical & Earth
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Formation of Caal2si2o8 in Melilite-Based Glass-Ceramics: Combined Diffraction and Spectroscopic Studies
    This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License, which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes. Article http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf Understanding the Formation of CaAl2Si2O8 in Melilite-Based Glass- Ceramics: Combined Diffraction and Spectroscopic Studies † ‡ † ‡ § ∥ ⊥ Amarnath R. Allu,*, , Sathravada Balaji, Dilshat U. Tulyaganov, , Glenn C. Mather, Fabian Margit, ∥ # ¶ # ∇ María J. Pascual, Reneé Siegel, Wolfgang Milius, Jürgen Senker, Dmitrii A. Agarkov, ∇ ‡ Vladislav V. Kharton, and JoséM. F. Ferreira*, † Glass Science and Technology Section, CSIRCentral Glass and Ceramic Research Institute, 700032 Kolkata, India ‡ Department of Materials and Ceramics Engineering, CICECO, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal § Turin Polytechnic University in Tashkent, 17, Small Ring, 100095 Tashkent, Uzbekistan ∥ Instituto de Ceramicá y Vidrio (CSIC), C/Kelsen 5, Campus de Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain ⊥ Centre for Energy Research, Konkoly-Thege Street 29-33, 1121 Budapest, Hungary # ¶ Inorganic Chemistry III and Inorganic Chemistry I, University of Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany ∇ Institute of Solid State Physics RAS, 142432 Chernogolovka, Moscow District, Russia *S Supporting Information ABSTRACT: An assessment is undertaken for the formation of anorthite crystalline phase in a − − − melilite-based glass composition (CMAS: 38.7CaO 9.7MgO 12.9Al2O3 38.7SiO2 mol %), used as a sealing material in solid oxide fuel cells, in view of the detrimental effect of anorthite on the sealing properties. Several advanced characterization techniques are employed to assess the material after prolonged heat treatment, including neutron powder diffraction (ND), X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), 29Si and 27Al magic-angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (MAS-NMR), and in situ Raman spectroscopy.
    [Show full text]
  • Progressive Metamorphism of Permian Siliceous Limestone and Dolomite
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/31 Progressive metamorphism of Permian siliceous limestone and dolomite - a complete sequence around a monzonite intrusion, Marble Canyon, Diablo Plateau, west Texas Thomas E. Bridge, 1980, pp. 225-229 in: Trans Pecos Region (West Texas), Dickerson, P. W.; Hoffer, J. M.; Callender, J. F.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 31st Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 308 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1980 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks.
    [Show full text]
  • Geochemical Modeling of Iron and Aluminum Precipitation During Mixing and Neutralization of Acid Mine Drainage
    minerals Article Geochemical Modeling of Iron and Aluminum Precipitation during Mixing and Neutralization of Acid Mine Drainage Darrell Kirk Nordstrom U.S. Geological Survey, Boulder, CO 80303, USA; [email protected] Received: 21 May 2020; Accepted: 14 June 2020; Published: 17 June 2020 Abstract: Geochemical modeling of precipitation reactions in the complex matrix of acid mine drainage is fundamental to understanding natural attenuation, lime treatment, and treatment procedures that separate constituents for potential reuse or recycling. The three main dissolved constituents in acid mine drainage are iron, aluminum, and sulfate. During the neutralization of acid mine drainage (AMD) by mixing with clean tributaries or by titration with a base such as sodium hydroxide or slaked lime, Ca(OH)2, iron precipitates at pH values of 2–3 if oxidized and aluminum precipitates at pH values of 4–5 and both processes buffer the pH during precipitation. Mixing processes were simulated using the ion-association model in the PHREEQC code. The results are sensitive to the solubility product constant (Ksp) used for the precipitating phases. A field example with data on discharge and water composition of AMD before and after mixing along with massive precipitation of an aluminum phase is simulated and shows that there is an optimal Ksp to give the best fit to the measured data. Best fit is defined when the predicted water composition after mixing and precipitation matches most closely the measured water chemistry. Slight adjustment to the proportion of stream discharges does not give a better fit. Keywords: geochemical modeling; acid mine drainage; iron and aluminum precipitation; schwertmannite; basaluminite 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultrahigh-Field Mg NMR and DFT Study of Magnesium Borate Minerals
    Ultrahigh-Field 25Mg NMR and DFT Study of Magnesium Borate Minerals 1 2† 3 4 5 Bing Zhou, § Alexandra Faucher, § Robert Laskowski, Victor V. Terskikh, Scott Kroeker, Wei Sun,6,7 Jinru Lin,6 Jin-Xiao Mi,7 Vladimir K. Michaelis2* and Yuanming Pan6* 1. College of Materials Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 21000, China 2. Department of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G2, Canada 3. Institute of High Performance Computing, A*STAR, 1 Fusionopolis Way, #16-16, Connexis, Singapore 138632 4. Department of Chemistry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5 Canada 5. Department of Chemistry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada 6. Department of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5E2, Canada 7. Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Advanced Materials, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Materials, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, Fujian Province, China †Current address: Bernal Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Republic of Ireland §BZ and AF contributed equally *Corresponding authors: Vladimir K. Michaelis ([email protected]) and Yuanming Pan ([email protected]) Keywords: MAS NMR, grandidierite, quantum chemical calculations, WURST, CPMG, wideline, NMR crystallography 1 ABSTRACT A series of well-characterized magnesium borate minerals and synthetic analogues have been studied via ultrahigh-field 25Mg solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Correlations between 25Mg NMR parameters and the local structure at the magnesium site(s) are highlighted and discussed. First-principles density functional theory calculations of 25Mg NMR parameters carried out with the WIEN2k software package support our experimental 25Mg NMR 25 data. Experimental Mg CQ values range from 0.7 ± 0.1 MHz in hungchaoite to 18.0 ± 0.5 MHz in 25 boracite-type Mg3B7O13Br.
    [Show full text]
  • Supergene Mineralogy and Processes in the San Xavier Mine Area, Pima County, Arizona
    Supergene mineralogy and processes in the San Xavier mine area, Pima County, Arizona Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Arnold, Leavitt Clark, 1940- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 28/09/2021 18:44:48 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/551760 SUPERGENE MINERALOGY AND PROCESSES IN THE SAN XAVIER MINE AREA— PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA by L. Clark Arnold A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1964 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of require­ ments for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is de­ posited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judg­ ment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author.
    [Show full text]
  • The New IMA List of Gem Materials – a Work in Progress – Updated: July 2018
    The New IMA List of Gem Materials – A Work in Progress – Updated: July 2018 In the following pages of this document a comprehensive list of gem materials is presented. The list is distributed (for terms and conditions see below) via the web site of the Commission on Gem Materials of the International Mineralogical Association. The list will be updated on a regular basis. Mineral names and formulae are from the IMA List of Minerals: http://nrmima.nrm.se//IMA_Master_List_%282016-07%29.pdf. Where there is a discrepancy the IMA List of Minerals will take precedence. Explanation of column headings: IMA status: A = approved (it applies to minerals approved after the establishment of the IMA in 1958); G = grandfathered (it applies to minerals discovered before the birth of IMA, and generally considered as valid species); Rd = redefined (it applies to existing minerals which were redefined during the IMA era); Rn = renamed (it applies to existing minerals which were renamed during the IMA era); Q = questionable (it applies to poorly characterized minerals, whose validity could be doubtful). Gem material name: minerals are normal text; non-minerals are bold; rocks are all caps; organics and glasses are italicized. Caveat (IMPORTANT): inevitably there will be mistakes in a list of this type. We will be grateful to all those who will point out errors of any kind, including typos. Please email your corrections to [email protected]. Acknowledgments: The following persons, listed in alphabetic order, gave their contribution to the building and the update of the IMA List of Minerals: Vladimir Bermanec, Emmanuel Fritsch, Lee A.
    [Show full text]
  • This Dissertation Has Been 62—2136 M Icrofilm Ed Exactly As Received GIELISSE, Peter Jacob M., 1934- INVESTIGATION of PHASE EQ
    This dissertation has been 62—2136 microfilmed exactly as received GIELISSE, Peter Jacob M., 1934- INVESTIGATION OF PHASE EQUILIBRIA IN THE SYSTEM ALUMINA-BORON OXIDE-SILICA. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1961 M ineralogy University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan INVESTIGATION OP PHASE EQUILIBRIA IN THE SYSTEM ALUMINA-BORON OXIDE-SILICA DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Peter Jacob M. Gielisse, M. S. The Ohio State University 1961 Approved by Adviser Department of Mineralogy ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer wishes to extend his sincere thanks to the many people without whose help the preparation of this dissertation would have been impossible. He is indebted in particular to his adviser, Dr. Wilfrid R. Foster, for his invaluable aid, advice and many kindnesses; to the other members of the faculty of the Department of Mineral ogy, Drs. Ernest G. Ehlers, Henry E. Wenden, and Rodney T Tettenhorst; and to his friend and colleague, Thomas J. Rockett. Acknowledgment is also made for financial support re­ ceived under contract No. AF 33(616)-3189, sponsored by Aeronautical Research Laboratories, Air Force Research Division, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio; as well as for aid received through a Mershon National Graduate Fellowship awarded to the writer by the Mershon Committee on Education in National Security for 1960-‘61'. It goes without saying that he is also most grate­ ful to his wife, Anna, for her excellent help and encour­ agement over the years. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strontium Borate) Mineral
    STUDIES ON TUNELLITE (STRONTIUM BORATE) MINERAL Hüseyin GÜLENSOY and T. TEBERDAR İstanbul University, Faculty of Chemistry SUMMARY. — In these studies, the physical, chemical and mineralogical properties of the tunellite found associated with the boron mines in Turkey, which have long been known, have been investigated and the chemical compositon determined. The thermal decomposition of tunellite mineral has been studied both by dynamic and static methods. The results obtained with the methods above were checked with those obtained by Röntgenographic analysis and with the DTA studies. As a result of these studies, it has been observed that the tunellite mineral was transformed into veatchite mineral, after losing 4 molecules of its crystal water. INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY Boron minerals which are gaining ever-increasing importance in the world industry occur widespread in the northwest part of Turkey. Boron occurrences of the country are generally located in the vicinity of Bigadiç, Balıkesir, Mustafakemalpaşa, Emet and Eskişehir. Borate ores encountered in these mines are generally, ulexite and colemanite. The reserves and the grade of the ore are con- sidered favorable for economic production. Associated with the colemanite and ulexite produced from these mines, some other boron minerals are also found and the most important of these are inyoite, meyerhofferite, tertschite and howlite. These secondary minerals are locally found interbedded in the clay seams, as thin beds or nodules. In some mines, a new mineral, showing the composition of strontium borate, is found in association with colemanite and ulexite; this new mineral, which sometimes shows a prismatic struc- ture, is also found to occur closely mixed with clay having bentonite texture.
    [Show full text]
  • NEW MINERALS It Is Proposed Hereafter to Indicate In.A General Way the Classification of All New Minerals Recoided in This Department
    JOURNAL MINERALOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMENICA 63 Dr. Kunz then spoke of the various city localities and the minerals found therein. He stated that the East Side, from 37 to 110 St., probably afforded the most specimens. The various tunnels and their minerals were spoken of. Capt. Miller called attention to the fine collection of Brooklyn Drift Minerals and Rocks in the collection of the Long Island Historical Society. Ife abo mentioned the occurrence of monazite and xenotime crystals, on the Speedway,Harlem River. Dr. Kunz emphasizedthe irnportance of complete records being kept of all finds. Tnou,q,s L Mrr,r,nn, SecretaryPro, Tem. NEW MINERALS It is proposed hereafter to indicate in.a general way the classification of all new minerals recoided in this department. Subdivision will be first into "families," of which nine may be recognized,as listed in the January number (Am. Min.6 (1), 12,1921). Eachfamilywillbe separatedinto "subfamilies " based on special features of composition. This arrangement is tentative and open to modification, and criticism of it will be welcome, [Eo.] FAMILY 2. SULFIDES, ETC. SosreMrr,v 3. Doust,u suLFrDEs oF METALSAND sEMr-METAr,s. I'LTRABASITE V. Rosrcxf and J. Srnnse-Btinu. Ultrabasit, ein neues Mineral aus Freiberg in Sachsen. (Ultrabasite, a new mineral from Freiberg, Saxony). Rozpr.Eeslcd Ako,il. Prag,25, No. 45, 1916;Z. Krgst. Min., 55,43H39, 1920, Neun: From its extremely basic chemical composition. Pnrsrcar, Pnopnnrrus Color black, somewhat grayish; luster metallic; streak black; cleavage none; fracture scaly, with somewhat greasy luster on the surface. H. : 5; sp. gr.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Mineralogist, 51
    785 The Canadian Mineralogist Vol. 51, pp. 785-800 (2013) DOI : 10.3749/canmin.51.5.785 A COMBINED GEOCHEMICAL AND GEOCHRONOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF NIOCALITE FROM THE OKA CARBONATITE COMPLEX, CANADA WEI CHEN§, ANTONIO SIMONETTI, AND PETER C. BURNS* Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering & Earth Sciences, 156 Fitzpatrick Hall, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame IN, 46556 USA ABSTRACT This study is the first to report a detailed geochemical investigation and in situ U-Pb ages for niocalite, which occurs within carbonatite from the Bond Zone area of the Oka Carbonatite Complex (Canada). Niocalite is a Nb-disilicate member of the låvenite−cuspidine group. The major element composition of the niocalite studied here is relatively homogeneous with the average formula of: (Na0.34Fe0.06Mn0.19Mg0.09Ca13.40REE0.15Ti0.02)Σ14.25Nb2.12Ta0.06(Si2O7)4O7.65F2.44. Niocalite is enriched in minor and trace elements [i.e., Ta, Ti, and rare earth elements (REEs) up to 4.35 wt.%], with double- and triple-valenced elements (i.e., Sr, Y, REEs) substituting at different Ca-occupied lattice sites. The chondrite-normalized REE patterns for niocalite are LREE-enriched (~104 times chondrite) and negatively sloped. In addition, niocalite has higher HREE contents compared to those for co-existing apatite from the identical carbonatite sample. This result is expected based on bond valence data because of differing cation sizes. In situ U-Pb ages for niocalite from three carbonatite samples obtained by LA-ICP-MS define a wide range of ages, between ~111 and ~133 Ma. Niocalite from one carbonatite sample yields a bimodal distribution with weighted mean 206Pb/238U ages of 110.1 ± 5.0 Ma and 133.2 ± 6.1 Ma, and overlap those of co-existing apatite for the same sample.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengite.Pdf
    3+ Strengite Fe PO4 • 2H2O c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Orthorhombic. Point Group: 2/m 2/m 2/m. Crystals are variable in habit, may be dominated by {111}, lathlike along [001], or elongated along [100] or [010], to 5 cm, with many forms. Generally radial fibrous, as botryoidal or spherical aggregates and crusts. Twinning: Rarely on {201}. Physical Properties: Cleavage: On {010}, good; on {001}, poor. Hardness = 3.5 D(meas.) = 2.84–2.87 D(calc.) = 2.84 Optical Properties: Transparent to translucent. Color: Purple, violet, pink, peach-blossom- red, carmine, greenish white; may be nearly colorless. Streak: White. Luster: Vitreous. Optical Class: Biaxial (+). Orientation: X = a; Y = c; Z = b. Dispersion: r< v,strong. α = 1.697–1.708 β = 1.708–1.719 γ = 1.741–1.745 2V(meas.) = Moderate to small. Cell Data: Space Group: P cab. a = 10.122(1) b = 9.886(1) c = 8.7233(7) Z = 8 X-ray Powder Pattern: The Kreuzberg, Germany. (ICDD 33–667). 3.114 (100), 4.383 (85), 5.509 (60), 2.546 (50), 3.996 (45), 3.002 (45), 2.949 (45) Chemistry: (1) (2) P2O5 38.24 37.99 Fe2O3 43.40 42.73 H2O 18.89 19.28 Total 100.53 100.00 • (1) Pleystein, Germany. (2) FePO4 2H2O. Polymorphism & Series: Dimorphous with phosphosiderite, forms a series with variscite. Mineral Group: Variscite group. Occurrence: A late secondary mineral in complex granite pegmatites; in “limonite” iron ores and gossans; with magnetite iron ores; rarely a cave mineral. Association: Beraunite, hur´eaulite,dufr´enite,bermanite, stewartite, cacoxenite, rockbridgeite, vivianite, apatite, leucophosphite, phosphosiderite.
    [Show full text]