DOCSLIB.ORG

Turkey River DRAFT Watershed Restoration August 2021 and Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Turkey River DRAFT Watershed Restoration August 2021 and Management Plan Turkey River DRAFT Watershed Restoration August 2021 and Management Plan Prepared for: Prepared by: Turkey River Watershed Restoration and Management Plan Acknowledgements Funding for this project was provided in part by a Watershed Assistance Grant from the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services with Clean Water Act Section 319 funds from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Funding support was also provided by generous contributions from supporters of the Upper Merrimack Watershed Association. i Turkey River Watershed Restoration and Management Plan Contents Introduction....………….….……...………………………………………………………………………….…………………1 1. Turkey River Water Quality Data ...................................................................................................... 4 1.1 SAMPLING DATA AND LOCATIONS .......................................................................................... 4 1.2 SUMMARY OF WATER QUALITY IMPAIRMENTS ..................................................................... 5 2. Water Quality Goals ........................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 WATER QUALITY GOAL SETTING - OVERVIEW ...................................................................... 7 2.2 PHOSPHORUS DATA AND RELEVANT CRITERIA ................................................................... 7 2.3 WATER QUALITY GOAL RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................... 9 2.4 SUMMARY OF WATER QUALITY GOAL SETTING MEETING ................................................ 11 3. Nutrient Load Modeling .................................................................................................................. 13 3.1 METHODS .................................................................................................................................. 13 3.1.1 Model Overview ................................................................................................................................ 13 3.1.2 Data Collection ................................................................................................................................. 13 3.1.3 Subwatershed Delineations .............................................................................................................. 13 3.1.4 Observed Water Quality Data........................................................................................................... 13 3.1.5 Model Inputs ..................................................................................................................................... 13 3.1.6 Buildout Analysis .............................................................................................................................. 18 3.2 CALIBRATION ............................................................................................................................ 19 3.2.1 Flow .................................................................................................................................................. 19 3.2.2 Nutrient Attenuation .......................................................................................................................... 19 3.2.3 Phosphorus Coefficients .................................................................................................................. 20 3.3 RESULTS ................................................................................................................................... 21 3.3.1 Phosphorus Loading by Source ....................................................................................................... 21 3.3.2 Phosphorus Loading by Subwatershed ............................................................................................ 22 3.4 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......................................................................................................... 25 4. Watershed Management ................................................................................................................... 26 4.1 STRUCTURAL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ................................................................. 26 4.1.1 Field Watershed Investigation .......................................................................................................... 26 4.1.2 Culvert Improvement Sites ............................................................................................................... 62 4.2 WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................... 67 4.2.1 Background ...................................................................................................................................... 67 ii Turkey River Watershed Restoration and Management Plan 4.2.2 New Hampshire State Regulations ................................................................................................... 67 4.2.3 Septic System Risk Analysis ............................................................................................................ 68 4.2.4 Alternative Treatment Systems ........................................................................................................ 72 4.2.5 Recommendations for Wastewater Management ............................................................................. 74 4.3 NON-STRUCTURAL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ....................................................... 75 4.3.1 Public Information and Education ..................................................................................................... 75 4.3.2 Land Conservation ........................................................................................................................... 78 4.3.3 Regulatory Tools .............................................................................................................................. 81 4.3.4 Institutional Practices and Programs ................................................................................................ 83 5. Summary of Technical and Financial Support ................................................................................ 88 5.1 TECHNICAL SUPPORT ............................................................................................................. 88 5.2 FINANCIAL SUPPORT ............................................................................................................... 88 6. Schedule and Interim Milestones .................................................................................................... 91 7. Evaluation Criteria and Monitoring ................................................................................................. 93 7.1 EVALUATION CRITERIA ........................................................................................................... 93 7.2 MONITORING ............................................................................................................................. 95 7.3 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT ....................................................................................................... 95 iii Turkey River Watershed Restoration and Management Plan Figures Figure 1: Turkey River Watershed ................................................................................................................ 2 Figure 2. Total Phosphorus Measurements from Turkey River Mainstem Monitoring Stations ................... 4 Figure 3. Turkey River Watershed – Impairments to Designated Uses ....................................................... 5 Figure 4. Turkey River Watershed Impaired Parameters ............................................................................. 6 Figure 5. Estimated Total Annual Phosphorus Load from Land Uses ........................................................ 22 Figure 6. Estimated Increase in Annual Average TP Concentration per Subwatershed at Buildout .......... 24 Figure 7. Proposed Structural BMP Locations ............................................................................................ 28 Figure 8. Culvert Locations in the Turkey River Watershed ....................................................................... 65 Figure 9. Septic System Risk Analysis for the Turkey River Watershed .................................................... 71 Figure 10. Alternative Onsite System with Phosphorus Treatment (Source: EPA, 2013) .......................... 72 Figure 11. Land Conservation Areas for the Turkey River Watershed ....................................................... 80 Tables Table 1. Existing U.S. State and Territory Total Phosphorus Criteria .......................................................... 9 Table 2. Vermont WWMG TP and Aquatic Habitat Criteria ........................................................................ 10 Table 3. Potential TP Goals for the Turkey River ....................................................................................... 10 Table 4. Water Quality Goal Setting Meeting Participants (March 1, 2021) ............................................... 11 Table 5. Annual Precipiation Totals ............................................................................................................ 14 Table 6. Calculated Subwatershed Area .................................................................................................... 14 Table 7. LLRM Specified Land Uses .........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Official List of Public Waters
    Official List of Public Waters New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Water Division Dam Bureau 29 Hazen Drive PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 (603) 271-3406 https://www.des.nh.gov NH Official List of Public Waters Revision Date October 9, 2020 Robert R. Scott, Commissioner Thomas E. O’Donovan, Division Director OFFICIAL LIST OF PUBLIC WATERS Published Pursuant to RSA 271:20 II (effective June 26, 1990) IMPORTANT NOTE: Do not use this list for determining water bodies that are subject to the Comprehensive Shoreland Protection Act (CSPA). The CSPA list is available on the NHDES website. Public waters in New Hampshire are prescribed by common law as great ponds (natural waterbodies of 10 acres or more in size), public rivers and streams, and tidal waters. These common law public waters are held by the State in trust for the people of New Hampshire. The State holds the land underlying great ponds and tidal waters (including tidal rivers) in trust for the people of New Hampshire. Generally, but with some exceptions, private property owners hold title to the land underlying freshwater rivers and streams, and the State has an easement over this land for public purposes. Several New Hampshire statutes further define public waters as including artificial impoundments 10 acres or more in size, solely for the purpose of applying specific statutes. Most artificial impoundments were created by the construction of a dam, but some were created by actions such as dredging or as a result of urbanization (usually due to the effect of road crossings obstructing flow and increased runoff from the surrounding area).
    [Show full text]
  • Partnership Opportunities for Lake-Friendly Living Service Providers NH LAKES Lakesmart Program
    Partnership Opportunities for Lake-Friendly Living Service Providers NH LAKES LakeSmart Program Only with YOUR help will New Hampshire’s lakes remain clean and healthy, now and in the future. The health of our lakes, and our enjoyment of these irreplaceable natural resources, is at risk. Polluted runoff water from the landscape is washing into our lakes, causing toxic algal blooms that make swimming in lakes unsafe. Failing septic systems and animal waste washed off the land are contributing bacteria to our lakes that can make people and pets who swim in the water sick. Toxic products used in the home, on lawns, and on roadways and driveways are also reaching our lakes, poisoning the water in some areas to the point where fish and other aquatic life cannot survive. NH LAKES has found that most property owners don’t know how their actions affect the health of lakes. We’ve also found that property owners want to do the right thing to help keep the lakes they enjoy clean and healthy and that they often need help of professional service providers like YOU! What is LakeSmart? The LakeSmart program is an education, evaluation, and recognition program that inspires property owners to live in a lake- friendly way, keeping our lakes clean and healthy. The program is free, voluntary, and non-regulatory. Through a confidential evaluation process, property owners receive tailored recommendations about how to implement lake-friendly living practices year-round in their home, on their property, and along and on the lake. Property owners have access to a directory of lake- friendly living service providers to help them adopt lake-friendly living practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Space Master Plan
    SECTION VII. CONSERVATION AND OPEN SPACE A. INTRODUCTION The Conservation and Open Space Section is intended to guide the protection of the City’s natural resources and environment while promoting the appropriate and efficient use of land and water within the City of Concord in a manner consistent with the economic, physical, and social needs and desires of the citizens of Concord. Appropriate uses of open space have been identified as recreation, public service and safety, resource production, and environmental protection while providing the maximum and multi-purpose use of open space by the citizens of Concord. Open space in Concord is intended to be a system, interconnected and interrelated, and therefore, the links among major open space areas, as well as between the open areas and developed areas, must be defined The Conservation and Open Space Use Section consists of a review of existing protected lands with a focus on additions to the protected land inventory that have occurred since the last Master Plan was adopted in December 1993. Conservation and open space goals are articulated, and applied to and interpreted upon the landscape of the City, and as displayed on maps that indicate how land in Concord should be preserved and protected. Policies and recommendations to guide the implementation of the Future Open Space Plan complete this Section of the Master Plan. B. CONSERVATION AND OPEN SPACE GOALS When the City Council established the Conservation Commission in 1971, it set forth for the Commission the goal of "protecting, promoting and developing the natural resources...and for protecting the watershed resource of the City" and mandated the Conservation Commission, in conjunction with the City Planning Board, to prepare "a conservation and open space plan" as the major objective in achieving this goal, noting that the plan shall be based "on the concept of multiple use of natural resources and open space".
    [Show full text]
  • Walden Planning Unit Resource Management Plan
    Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Bureau of Planning and Resource Protection Resource Management Planning Program RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Walden Planning Unit Including Walden Pond State Reservation May 2013 In coordination with: Crosby | Schlessinger | Smallridge, LLC Walden Planning Unit Including Walden Pond State Reservation RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2013 Deval L. Patrick, Governor Timothy P. Murray, Lt. Governor Richard K. Sullivan, Jr., Secretary Edward M. Lambert, Jr., Commissioner John P. Murray, Deputy Commissioner for Park Operations Resource Management Plans (RMPs) provide guidelines for management of properties under the stewardship of the Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR). They are intended to be working documents for setting priorities, enabling the Department to adapt to changing fiscal, social, and environmental conditions. The planning process provides a forum for communication and cooperation with park visitors and the surrounding communities to ensure transparency in the DCR’s stewardship efforts. One of the most recognizable properties in the DCR park system, Walden Pond State Reservation is an iconic national and international destination. The pond that inspired Henry David Thoreau’s seminal work Walden, or Life in the Woods holds divergent meanings. To many, the reservation is a sacred landscape and international cultural heritage site. To some, it is a profound symbol of both Thoreau’s writings and the genesis of the land conservation movement. Simultaneously, the reservation is valued for its recreation opportunities, whether swimming in Walden Pond’s waters on hot summer days, canoeing on the pond’s calm waters, or cross-country skiing in its surrounding forests. This plan outlines recommendations that will improve the visitor experience for all, while preserving Walden Pond and its surrounding natural and cultural resources for the benefit of future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Lakes Region
    Aú Aè ?« Aà Kq ?¨ Aè Aª Ij Cã !"b$ V# ?¨ ?{ V# ?¬ V# Aà ?¬ V# # VV# V# V# Kq Aà A© V# V# Aê !"a$ V# V# V# V# V# V# V# ?¨ V# Kq V# V# V# Aà C° V# V# V# V#V# ?¬A B C D V# E F G 9.6 V#Mount Passaconaway Kq BAKERAê RIVER 10.0 Saco River WARRENWARREN 9.2 Mount Paugus Mount Chocorua 0.9 NH 25A 0.2 Peaked Hill Pond Ij Mad River Mount Whiteface V# ?Ã Noon0 Peak 2.5 5 10 V# Pequawket Pond CONWAY Mud Pond V# CONWAY ELLSWORTHELLSWORTH Aj JenningsV# Peak ?¨Iona Lake Cone Pond MilesALBANYALBANY Conway Lake LAKES REGIONNH 175 THORNTONTHORNTON WHITE MOUNTAIN NATIONAL FOREST Ellsworth Pond WATERVILLEWATERVILLEV# VALLEYVALLEY Upper Pequawket Pond Flat Mountain Ponds Snake Pond WENTWORTHWENTWORTH US 3 Sandwich MountainSandwich Dome Ledge Pond WW H H I I T T E E MM O O U U N N T T A A I I N N RR E E G G I I O O N N Whitton Pond BICYCLE ROUTES V# Haunted Pond Dollof Pond 1 I NH 49 Middle Pea Porridge Pond 1 27 Pea Porridge Pond Ae ")29 13.4 Labrador Pond 4.0 ?{ 34 Atwood Pond Aá 8.6 Campton Pond Black Mtn Pond Lonely Lake Davis Pond Tilton Pond Câ James Pond 14.1 Chinook Trail South Branch Moosilauke Rd 13.0 2.1 Chase Rd Chocorua Lake RUMNEYRUMNEY 2.8 ")28 Great Hill Pond fg Tyler Bog Roberts Pond 2.0 Guinea Pond Little Lake Blue PondMADISONMADISON R-5 4.2 HEMMENWAY STATE FOREST Mack Pond Loud Pond NH 118 Pemigewasset River 5.1 Mailly Pond Drew Pond 3.7 fg Buffalo Rd CAMPTON Hatch PondEATONEATON 5.3 CAMPTON Baker River Silver Pond Beebe River ?¬ Quincy Rd Chocorua Rd DORCHESTERDORCHESTER 27 0.8 Durgin Pond ") SANDWICHSANDWICH 4.5 Loon Lake BLAIR STATE
    [Show full text]
  • View Our Current Map Listing
    Country (full-text) State (full-text) State Abbreviation County Lake Name Depth (X if no Depth info) Argentina Argentina (INT) Rio de la Plata (INT) Rio de la Plata (From Buenos Aires to Montevideo) Aruba Aruba (INT) Aruba (INT) Aruba Australia Australia (INT) Australia (Entire Country) (INT) Australia (Entire Country) Australia Australia (INT) Queensland (INT) Fraser Island Australia Australia (INT) Cape York Peninsula (INT) Great Barrier Reef (Cape York Peninsula) Australia Australia (INT) New South Wales (INT) Kurnell Peninsula Australia Australia (INT) Queensland (INT) Moreton Island Australia Australia (INT) Sydney Harbor (INT) Sydney Harbor (Greenwich to Point Piper) Australia Australia (INT) Sydney Harbor (INT) Sydney Harbor (Olympic Park to Watsons Bay) Australia Australia (INT) Victoria (INT) Warrnambool Australia Australia (INT) Whitsunday Islands (INT) Whitsunday Islands Austria Austria (INT) Vorarlberg (INT) Lake Constance Bahamas Bahamas (INT) Bahamas (INT) Abaco Island Bahamas Bahamas (INT) Elbow Cay (INT) Elbow Cay Bahamas Bahamas (INT) Bahamas (INT) Eleuthera Island Bahamas Bahamas (INT) Bahamas (INT) Exuma Cays (Staniel Cay with Bitter Guana Cay and Guana Cay South) Bahamas Bahamas (INT) The Exumas (INT) Great Exuma and Little Exuma Islands Bahamas Bahamas (INT) Bahamas (INT) Long Island and Ruma Cay Bahamas Bahamas (INT) New Providence (INT) New Providence Bahamas Bahamas (INT) Bahamas (INT) San Salvador Island Bahamas Bahamas (INT) Waderick Wells Cay (INT) Waderick Wells Cay Barbados Barbados (INT) Barbados (Lesser Antilles)
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Fact Sheet: Water Milfoil
    ENVIRONMENTAL NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF Environmental Services B Hazen Drive, Concord, New Hampshire 03301 • [603) 271-3503 • www.state.nh.us/des WD-DD-1 Revised 1997 Water Milfoil Aquatic plants are found in most of the lakes and ponds in New Hampshire. They are a natural component and a vital link to a healthy and diverse aquatic ecosystem. When aquatic plants interfere with man's activities, the plants are quickly designated "weeds" - something that must be removed. However, complete eradication of native aquatic plants is not recommended. Not only is it costly and impractical, it is detrimental to a healthy lake ecosystem. Nature abhors a vacuum - and will quickly repopulate an empty niche. A balanced population of plant life is the ultimate goal. New Hampshire has been fortunate not to have had many serious "weed" problems in its lakes and ponds. The one exception has been the introduction of exotic or non- native weeds such as milfoil (Myriophyllum heterophyllum). Most exotic species of animals or plants introduced to a foreign habitat have few, it any, enemies to keep them in check. Milfoil is no exception - and has become an economic and recreational nuisance in certain waters of the state. This fact sheet was prepared to answer the questions that are most often asked by the public concerning the milfoil problem. 1. Why is exotic milfoil considered to be a nuisance in New Hampshire surface waters? This species is not native to our state and it is very difficult to control once it becomes fully established . Milfoil spreads rapidly and displaces beneficial native plant life.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 LIST of THREATENED OR IMPAIRED WATERS THAT REQUIRE a TMDL Mar
    2014 LIST OF THREATENED OR IMPAIRED WATERS THAT REQUIRE A TMDL Mar. 27, 2017 (i.e., Category 5 Impairments - this represtents the Section 303(d) List) Page 1 of 91 (Excluding Fish/Shellfish Consumption Advisories due to Mercury - see Note 3) R-WD-15-11 Notes: 1. See the Consolidated Assessment and Listing Methodology (CALM) for definitions and details regarding how this list was developed. 2. This list is sorted by Waterbody Type and then Assessment Unit ID. 3. By this note, all marine surface waters in New Hampshire are also included on this list due to statewide fish/shellfish consumption advisories issued because of mercury levels in fish/shellfish tissue. To keep the size of this list manageable, mercury impairment for fish/shellfish consumption are not shown below. 4. TMDL stands for Total Maximum Daily Load study. TMDL schedules are subject to change as funding and resources become available. 5. Waters presented on this list may also be threatened or impaired by other pollutants or nonpollutants that do not require a TMDL. Assessment Water Primary Water Size Use Impairment DES TMDL Source Unit ID Name Town Size Unit Desc Name Category Threatened Priority Name NHEST600030406-01 Salmon Falls River Dover 0.282 Sq. miles Aquatic Life Chlorophyll-a 5-P N Low Source Unknown Dissolved oxygen saturation 5-P N Low Source Unknown Nitrogen (Total) 5-M N Low Source Unknown Oxygen, Dissolved 5-P N Low Source Unknown pH 5-M N Low Source Unknown Fish Consumption Polychlorinated biphenyls 5-M N Low Source Unknown Primary Contact Chlorophyll-a 5-P N Low Source Unknown Recreation Nitrogen (Total) 5-P N Low Source Unknown Shellfishing Dioxin (including 2,3,7,8-TCDD) 5-M N Low Source Unknown Polychlorinated biphenyls 5-M N Low Source Unknown NHEST600030608-01 Cocheco River Dover 0.277 Sq.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resource Inventory
    NATURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY OF HARRISVILLE, NH SEPTEMBER 26, 2013 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: SURVEY - SAMPLE SURVEY, DATA TABULATIONS, VERBATIM COMMENTS APPENDIX B: SPECIES LIST APPENDIX C: CHILDREN'S NRI APPENDIX D: VLAP REPORTS FOR MAJOR PONDS 85 APPENDIX A SURVEY - SAMPLE SURVEY, DATA TABULATIONS, VERBATIM COMMENTS HARRISVILLE NATURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY COMMUNITY SURVEY The Harrisville Natural Resource Inventory working group conducted a town-wide survey of resident attitudes toward various aspects of our natural resource heritage. Between July, 2012 and October 2012 surveys were gathered at Old Home Days, during three workshops on various aspects of the natural community, at two distribution locations (Harrisville General Store, Harrisville Town Hall) and by direct mail to every household with a Harrisville mailing address (nearly 500 homes). In total, 89 residents participated in the research. The 4-page survey included ratings for the importance of 14 aspects of our resource heritage. Ratings were provided for various aspects of our natural resource base (water, land and air quality, wildlife habitat, recreational and agricultural resources). To put natural resource ratings in context, ratings were also gathered for Harrisville's cultural and commercial resources. These ratings are summarized in the chart below: Harrisville Natural Resource Inventory Survey Results % Rating each item Most or 2nd Most Imporant #1 - Most important #2 - Next most important (on a scale of #1 to #7 = least important) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% NATURAL RESOURCES:
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Invasive Species
    Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) Infestation in New Hampshire Pittsburg Legend AIS Infestations Type Clarksville a[ Atkinson & Gilmanton Asian clam Ü Stewartstown Brazilian elodea X Dixs GrantSecond College Colebrook .! Curly-leaf pondweed Dixville $+ Eurasian milfoil Wentworths Location Columbia Eurasian milfoil, European naiad, Didymo, curly-leaf pondweed, water chestnut " Ervings Location ^_ European naiad Millsfield Errol # Fanwort Odell Stratford ! Variable milfoil a[ Variable milfoil, Asian clam Dummer Cambridge $1 Variable milfoil, Curly-leaf pondweed Stark Northumberland " Variable milfoil, Eurasian milfoil, fanwort, water chestnut, European naiad, curly-leaf pondweed Milan [! Variable milfoil, European naiad Success Variable milfoil, curly-leaf pondweed Kilkenny Berlin Lancaster *# Variable milfoil, fanwort /" Variable milfoil, fanwort, Eurasian milfoil, curly-leaf pondweed, European naiad Jefferson Randolph Gorham Town_Boundaries_polygons Dalton Shelburne Whitefield NH_Hydrography_polygons Littleton Low & Burbanks Martins Location State_Boundary Carroll Thompson & Meserve Beans Purchase Monroe Greens Grant Lyman Crawfords Purchase Pinkham's Grant Bethlehem Lisbon Chandlers Purchase 0 12.5 25 50 Miles Sugar Hill Beans Grant Cutts Grant Bath Franconia Sargents PurchaseJackson Chatham Landaff Hart's Location Easton Hadleys Purchase Bartlett Haverhill Lincoln Benton Livermore Hales Location Conway Woodstock Piermont Albany Warren Waterville Valley Thornton Ellsworth Eaton Orford Madison Wentworth Tamworth 74 Sandwich 46 $+ Rumney
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Habitats, Natural Communities, and Rare Species Analysis for Concord, New Hampshire
    Wildlife Habitats, Natural Communities, and Rare Species Analysis for Concord, New Hampshire Dan Sperduto Sperduto Ecological Services, LLC Canterbury, New Hampshire with contributions from Ellen Snyder, Ibis Wildlife Consulting, Newmarket, New Hampshire October 2010 Sperduto Ecological Services, LLC 359 Baptist Road Canterbury, New Hampshire 03224 [email protected] Cover: Red maple floodplain forest along the Soucook River Above: Pontederia cordata (pickerel weed) dominates the border of Turtletown Pond Table of Contents Overview .................................................................................................................... 5 1 - Methods ................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 - WAP Habitat Map Refinement ......................................................................................................... 5 1.2 - Predicted exemplary natural communities ...................................................................................... 6 1.2 - Rare Species and Exemplary Natural Communities ......................................................................... 7 1.3 - Conservation Recommendations ..................................................................................................... 7 A Word About the WAP Habitat Quality Assessment ....................................................................... 7 Conservation Priorities .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2008 Proposed Herbicide Applications For
    2008 Proposed Herbicide Applications for Control of Variable Milfoil in New Hampshire Waterbodies Waterbody Town Treatment Date1 Applicator Captains Pond Salem 5/22/08 Aquatic Control Technology, Inc. Phone: 508-865-1000 Lake Pemigewasset Meredith/New Hampton 5/22/2008 Lycott Environmental, Inc. Phone: 508-765-0101 Melendy Pond Brookline 5/23 or 6/11 Aquatic Control Technology, Inc. Phone: 508-865-1000 Lake Potanipo Brookline 5/23 or 6/11 Aquatic Control Technology, Inc. Phone: 508-865-1000 Lake Winnipesaukee, Back Bay Wolfeboro 6/3/08 Aquatic Control Technology, Inc. Phone: 508-865-1000 Lake Wentworth Wolfeboro 6/3/08 Aquatic Control Technology, Inc. Phone: 508-865-1000 Lake Winnipesaukee, Lakeport Landing Laconia 6/4/08 Aquatic Control Technology, Inc. Phone: 508-865-1000 Lees Pond Moultonboro 6/4/08 Aquatic Control Technology, Inc. Phone: 508-865-1000 Lake Winnipesaukee, Pickerel Cove Laconia 6/4/08 Aquatic Control Technology, Inc. Phone: 508-865-1000 Haunted Lake (aka Scobie Pond) Francestown 6/4/2008 Lycott Environmental, Inc. Phone: 508-765-0101 Northwood Lake Northwood 6/4/2008 Lycott Environmental, Inc. Phone: 508-765-0101 Powwow Pond Kingston 6/4/2008 Lycott Environmental, Inc. Phone: 508-765-0101 Lake Winnipesaukee, Black Cat Island Moultonboro 6/5/2008 Lycott Environmental, Inc. Phone: 508-765-0101 Forest Lake Winchester 6/9/08 Aquatic Control Technology, Inc. Phone: 508-865-1000 Lake Monomonac Rindge 6/9/08 Aquatic Control Technology, Inc. Phone: 508-865-1000 Contoocook Lake Jaffrey 6/10/08 Aquatic Control Technology, Inc. Phone: 508-865-1000 Pearly Pond Rindge 6/10/08 Aquatic Control Technology, Inc.
    [Show full text]