DOCSLIB.ORG

23618 2019 35 1501 27992 J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
23618 2019 35 1501 27992 J 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3123 of 2020 DR. JAISHRI LAXMANRAO PATIL ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE CHIEF MINISTER & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3124 of 2020 SANJEET SHUKLA ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3133 of 2020 KRISHNAJI DATTATRAYA MORE ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DR. JAISHRI LAXMANRAO & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3134 of 2020 MADHUSHRI NANDKISHOR JETHLIYA & ORS. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) 2 WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3131 of 2020 DEVENDRA ROOPCHAND JAIN & ORS. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3129 of 2020 KAMALAKAR SUKHDEO DARODE @ DARWADE ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH WRIT PETITION (C) NO.915 of 2020 DESHMUKH ESHA GIRISH ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH WRIT PETITION (C) NO.504 of 2020 ADITYA BIMAL SHASTRI & ORS. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH 3 WRIT PETITION (C) NO.914 of 2020 DR. AMITA LALIT GUGALE & ORS. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3127 of 2020 SAGAR DAMODAR SARDA & ORS. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3126 of 2020 MOHAMMAD SAYEED NOORI SHAFI AHMED & ORS. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3125 of 2020 DR. UDAY GOVINDRAJ DHOPLE & ANR. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH 4 CIVIL APPEAL NO.3128 of 2020 VISHNUJI P. MISHRA ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3130 of 2020 RUCHITA JITEN KULKARNI & ORS. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE CHIEF MINISTER & ANR. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH WRIT PETITION (C) NO.938 of 2020 SHIV SANGRAM & ANR. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ...RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T Ashok Bhushan,J.(for himself and S. Abdul Nazeer, J.), L.Nageswara Rao,J. Hemant Gupta,J. and S. Ravindra Bhat have also concurred on Question Nos. 1, 2 and 3. This Constitution Bench has been constituted to consider questions of seminal importance relating to 5 contours and extent of special provisions for the advancement of socially and educationally backward class (SEBC) of citizens as contemplated under Article 15(4) and contours and extent of provisions of reservation in favour of the backward class citizens under Article 16(4) of the Constitution of India. The challenge/interpretation of the Constitution (102nd Amendment) Act, 2018 is also up for consideration. 2. All the above appeals have been filed challenging the common judgment of the High Court dated 27.06.2019 by which judgment several batches of writ petitions have been decided by the High Court. Different writ petitions were filed before the High Court between the years 2014 to 2019, apart from other challenges following were under challenge: The Ordinance No. XIII of 2014 dated 09.07.2014 providing 16% reservation to Maratha. The Ordinance No.XIV of 2014 dated 09.07.2014 providing for 5% reservation to 52 Muslim 6 Communities. The Maharashtra State Reservation (of seats for appointment in educational institutions in the State and for appointment or posts for public services under the State) for educationally and socially backward category (ESBC) Act, 2014 and Maharashtra State Socially and Educationally Backward Class (SEBC) (Admission in Educational Institutions in the State and for posts for appointments in public service and posts) Reservation Act, 2018 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act, 2018”). 3. The High Court by the impugned judgment upheld Act, 2018, except to the extent of quantum of reservation provided under Section 4(1)(a), 4(1)(b) over and above 12% and 13% respectively as recommended by Maharashtra State Backward Class Commission. The writ petitions challenging the Ordinance XIII and XIV of 2014 as well as Act, 2014 were dismissed as having become infructuous. Few writ petitions were also allowed and few detagged and other writ petitions have been disposed of. 7 4. Writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, namely, Writ Petition(C) No. 938 of 2020 (Shiv Sangram & Anr. vs. Union of India & Anr.) has been filed questioning the Constitution (102nd Amendment) Act, 2018. 5. While issuing notice on 12.07.2019, a three- Judge Bench of this Court directed that the action taken pursuant to the impugned judgment of the High Court shall be subject to the result of the SLP. It was made clear that the judgment of the High Court and the reservation in question shall not have any retrospective effect. The three-Judge Bench after hearing the parties, on 09.09.2020, while granting leave passed following order: “17. In view of the foregoing, we pass the following orders: - (A) As the interpretation of the provisions inserted by the Constitution (102nd Amendment) Act, 2018 is a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, these Appeals are referred to a larger Bench. These matters shall be placed before Hon’ble The Chief Justice of India for suitable orders. 8 (B) Admissions to educational institutions for the academic year 2020-21 shall be made without reference to the reservations provided in the Act. We make it clear that the Admissions made to Post-Graduate Medical Courses shall not be altered. (C) Appointments to public services and posts under the Government shall be made without implementing the reservation as provided in the Act. Liberty to mention for early hearing. “ 6. A Three-Judge Bench referring the matter to Constitution Bench has referred all the appeals and the order contemplated that the matter shall be placed before the Chief Justice for the suitable orders. Referring order although mention that the interpretation of Constitution (One Hundred and Second Amendment) Act, 2018 is substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution but the reference was not confined to the above question. The learned counsel for the parties have made elaborate submissions in all the appeals as well as the writ petitions filed under Article 32. Elaborate submissions were addressed on the impugned judgment of the High Court. We thus have proceeded 9 to hear the parties and decide all the appeals and writ petitions finally. 7. After appeals being referred to a larger Bench by order dated 09.09.2020, Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India has constituted this Constitution Bench before whom these appeals and writ petitions are listed. This Constitution Bench after hearing learned counsel for the parties passed an order on 08.03.2021 issuing notice to all the States. The Bench by order further directed the States to file brief notes of their submissions. 8. The hearing commenced on 15.03.2021 and concluded on 26.03.2021. At this stage, we may indicate the headings in which we have divided to comprehensively understand the issues, submissions, our consideration, our conclusion and operative part of the judgment. The following are the heads of subjects under which we have treated the entire batch of cases: 10 (1) Questions Framed. (2) Background Facts. (3) Points for consideration before the High Court. (4) Submissions of the parties. (5) The 10 grounds urged for referring Indra Sawhney judgment to a larger Bench. (6) The status of Reservation at the time of Enactment of Act, 2018. (7) Consideration of 10 grounds urged for revisiting and referring the judgment of Indra Sawhney to a larger Bench. (8) Principle of Stare Decisis. (9) Whether Gaikwad Commission Report has made out a case of extra-ordinary situation for grant of separate reservation to Maratha community exceeding 50% limit ? (10) Whether the Act, 2018 as amended in 2019 granting separate reservation for Maratha community by exceeding the ceiling limit of 50% makes out exceptional circumstances as per the judgment of Indra Sawhney ? (11) Gaikwad Commission Report – a scrutiny. (12) Whether the data of Marathas in public employment as found out by Gaikwad Commission makes out cases for grant of reservation under Article 16(4) of the Constitution of India to Maratha community ? (13) Social and Educational Backwardness of Maratha Community. 11 (14) The Constitution (102nd Amendment) Act, 2018. (15) Conclusions. (16) Order. 9. On 08.03.2021 the six questions which were proposed to be considered were enumerated in the following manner: (1)Questions Framed. “1. Whether judgment in case of Indra Sawhney v. Union of India [1992 Suppl. (3) SCC 217] needs to be referred to larger bench or require re-look by the larger bench in the light of subsequent Constitutional Amendments, judgments and changed social dynamics of the society etc.? 2. Whether Maharashtra State Reservation (of seats for admission in educational institutions in the State and for appointments in the public services and posts under the State) for Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBC) Act, 2018 as amended in 2019 granting 12% and 13% reservation for Maratha community in addition to 50% social reservation is covered by exceptional circumstances as contemplated by Constitution Bench in Indra Sawhney’s case? 3. Whether the State Government on the strength of Maharashtra State Backward Commission Report chaired by M.C. Gaikwad has made 12 out a case of existence of extraordinary situation and exceptional circumstances in the State to fall within the 12 exception carved out in the judgment of Indra Sawhney? 4. Whether the Constitution One Hundred and Second Amendment deprives the State Legislature of its power to enact a legislation determining the socially and economically backward classes and conferring the benefits on the said community under its enabling power? 5.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Complete List of Books in Library Acc No Author Title of Book Subject Publisher Year R.No
    Complete List of Books in Library Acc No Author Title of book Subject Publisher Year R.No. 1 Satkari Mookerjee The Jaina Philosophy of PHIL Bharat Jaina Parisat 8/A1 Non-Absolutism 3 Swami Nikilananda Ramakrishna PER/BIO Rider & Co. 17/B2 4 Selwyn Gurney Champion Readings From World ECO `Watts & Co., London 14/B2 & Dorothy Short Religion 6 Bhupendra Datta Swami Vivekananda PER/BIO Nababharat Pub., 17/A3 Calcutta 7 H.D. Lewis The Principal Upanisads PHIL George Allen & Unwin 8/A1 14 Jawaherlal Nehru Buddhist Texts PHIL Bruno Cassirer 8/A1 15 Bhagwat Saran Women In Rgveda PHIL Nada Kishore & Bros., 8/A1 Benares. 15 Bhagwat Saran Upadhya Women in Rgveda LIT 9/B1 16 A.P. Karmarkar The Religions of India PHIL Mira Publishing Lonavla 8/A1 House 17 Shri Krishna Menon Atma-Darshan PHIL Sri Vidya Samiti 8/A1 Atmananda 20 Henri de Lubac S.J. Aspects of Budhism PHIL sheed & ward 8/A1 21 J.M. Sanyal The Shrimad Bhagabatam PHIL Dhirendra Nath Bose 8/A2 22 J.M. Sanyal The Shrimad PHIL Oriental Pub. 8/A2 Bhagabatam VolI 23 J.M. Sanyal The Shrimad PHIL Oriental Pub. 8/A2 Bhagabatam Vo.l III 24 J.M. Sanyal The Shrimad Bhagabatam PHIL Oriental Pub. 8/A2 25 J.M. Sanyal The Shrimad PHIL Oriental Pub. 8/A2 Bhagabatam Vol.V 26 Mahadev Desai The Gospel of Selfless G/REL Navijvan Press 14/B2 Action 28 Shankar Shankar's Children Art FIC/NOV Yamuna Shankar 2/A2 Number Volume 28 29 Nil The Adyar Library Bulletin LIT The Adyar Library and 9/B2 Research Centre 30 Fraser & Edwards Life And Teaching of PER/BIO Christian Literature 17/A3 Tukaram Society for India 40 Monier Williams Hinduism PHIL Susil Gupta (India) Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Unravelling the Indian Conception of Secularism: Tremors of the Pandemic and Beyond
    Katrak, N and Kulkarni, S. 2021. Unravelling the Indian Conception of Secularism: Tremors of the Pandemic and Beyond. Secularism and Nonreligion, 10: 4, pp. 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/snr.145 RESEARCH ARTICLE Unravelling the Indian Conception of Secularism: Tremors of the Pandemic and Beyond Malcolm Katrak* and Shardool Kulkarni† The State’s engagement with religion has formed one of the recurring themes of conflict in India’s demo- cratic experiment. The Indian model of secularism, which evolved in an attempt to resolve this conflict, has distinguished itself from separation-model secularism. This paper seeks to analyse the impact of the measures undertaken during the COVID-19 pandemic on the Indian understanding of secularism. To this end, it provides an overview of the nature and evolution of Indian secularism. Thereafter, it encapsulates the steps taken by the State to meet the exigencies of the present contagion and attempts to gauge the impact of the said steps on the jurisprudence on religious freedoms. It then seeks to contextualise this impact by using it to inform the Indian conception of secularism and, thereby, promote a richer, more holistic understanding of how a deeply divided society has functioned as a secular State for seven decades. 1 Introduction much of the globe in crisis, chaos and panic, has not left Religion has frequently formed the bone of socio-politi- India untouched. The pandemic is not only a public health cal contention in India; a country whose social milieu is crisis of monumental proportions but has had cascading characterised in equal parts by its multicultural diver- effects on almost all aspects of public life across the globe sity and inter-religious strife.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Affairs= 07-09-2020
    CURRENT AFFAIRS= 07-09-2020 KESAVANANDA BHARATI Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressed grief over the passing away of Kesavananda Bharati Ji. About: Kesavananda Bharati was the head seer of the Edneer Mutt in Kasaragod district of Kerala since 1961. He left his signature in one of the significant rulings of the Supreme Court when he challenged the Kerala land reforms legislation in 1970. The Kesavananda Bharati judgement, is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India that outlined the basic structure doctrine of the Constitution. Justice Hans Raj Khanna asserted through the Basic Structure doctrine that the constitution possesses a basic structure of constitutional principles and values. The doctrine forms the basis of power of the Indian judiciary to review and override amendments to the Constitution of India enacted by the Indian parliament. MOPLAH REBELLION A report submitted to the Indian Council of Historical Research (ICHR) in 2016 had recommended the removal of the Wagon Tragedy victims and Malabar Rebellion leaders Ali Musliyar and Variamkunnath Ahmad Haji, and Haji’s two brothers from a book on martyrs of India’s freedom struggle. CROSS & CLIMB 2019 1 About: The report sought the removal of names of 387 ‘Moplah rioters’ from the list of martyrs. The book, Dictionary of Martyrs: India’s Freedom Struggle 1857-1947, was released by Prime Minister Narendra Modi last week. The report describes Haji as the “notorious Moplah Riot leader” and a “hardcore criminal,” who “killed innumerable innocent Hindu men, women, and children during the 1921 Moplah Riot, and deposited their bodies in a well, locally known as Thoovoor Kinar”.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources of Maratha History: Indian Sources
    1 SOURCES OF MARATHA HISTORY: INDIAN SOURCES Unit Structure : 1.0 Objectives 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Maratha Sources 1.3 Sanskrit Sources 1.4 Hindi Sources 1.5 Persian Sources 1.6 Summary 1.7 Additional Readings 1.8 Questions 1.0 OBJECTIVES After the completion of study of this unit the student will be able to:- 1. Understand the Marathi sources of the history of Marathas. 2. Explain the matter written in all Bakhars ranging from Sabhasad Bakhar to Tanjore Bakhar. 3. Know Shakavalies as a source of Maratha history. 4. Comprehend official files and diaries as source of Maratha history. 5. Understand the Sanskrit sources of the Maratha history. 6. Explain the Hindi sources of Maratha history. 7. Know the Persian sources of Maratha history. 1.1 INTRODUCTION The history of Marathas can be best studied with the help of first hand source material like Bakhars, State papers, court Histories, Chronicles and accounts of contemporary travelers, who came to India and made observations of Maharashtra during the period of Marathas. The Maratha scholars and historians had worked hard to construct the history of the land and people of Maharashtra. Among such scholars people like Kashinath Sane, Rajwade, Khare and Parasnis were well known luminaries in this field of history writing of Maratha. Kashinath Sane published a mass of original material like Bakhars, Sanads, letters and other state papers in his journal Kavyetihas Samgraha for more eleven years during the nineteenth century. There is much more them contribution of the Bharat Itihas Sanshodhan Mandal, Pune to this regard.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Contemporary India
    OF CONTEMPORARY INDIA Catalogue Of The Papers of Prabhakar Machwe Plot # 2, Rajiv Gandhi Education City, P.O. Rai, Sonepat – 131029, Haryana (India) Dr. Prabhakar Machwe (1917-1991) Prolific writer, linguist and an authority on Indian literature, Dr. Prabhakar Machwe was born on 26 December 1917 at Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India. He graduated from Vikram University, Ujjain and obtained Masters in Philosophy, 1937, and English Literature, 1945, Agra University; Sahitya Ratna and Ph.D, Agra University, 1957. Dr. Machwe started his career as a lecturer in Madhav College, Ujjain, 1938-48. He worked as Literary Producer, All India Radio, Nagpur, Allahabad and New Delhi, 1948-54. He was closely associated with Sahitya Akademi from its inception in 1954 and served as Assistant Secretary, 1954-70, and Secretary, 1970-75. Dr. Machwe was Visiting Professor in Indian Studies Departments at the University of Wisconsin and the University of California on a Fulbright and Rockefeller grant (1959-1961); and later Officer on Special Duty (Language) in Union Public Service Commission, 1964-66. After retiring from Sahitya Akademi in 1975, Dr. Machwe was a visiting fellow at the Institute of Advanced Studies, Simla, 1976-77, and Director of Bharatiya Bhasha Parishad, Calcutta, 1979-85. He spent the last years of his life in Indore as Chief Editor of a Hindi daily, Choutha Sansar, 1988-91. Dr. Prabhakar Machwe travelled widely for lecture tours to Germany, Russia, Sri Lanka, Mauritius, Japan and Thailand. He organised national and international seminars on the occasion of the birth centenaries of Mahatma Gandhi, Rabindranath Tagore, and Sri Aurobindo between 1961 and 1972.
    [Show full text]
  • India's New Constitutionalism: Two Cases That Have Reshaped Indian Law Milan Dalal
    Boston College International and Comparative Law Review Volume 31 | Issue 2 Article 4 5-1-2008 India's New Constitutionalism: Two Cases That Have Reshaped Indian Law Milan Dalal Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/iclr Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Milan Dalal, India's New Constitutionalism: Two Cases That Have Reshaped Indian Law, 31 B.C. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 257 (2008), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/iclr/vol31/iss2/4 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INDIA’S NEW CONSTITUTIONALISM: TWO CASES THAT HAVE RESHAPED INDIAN LAW Milan Dalal* Abstract: As a nation of over one billion people and the world’s largest democracy, India is sometimes confronted with situations in which its democratic institutions clash. Under the Indian Constitution, legislation concerning land reform is placed in a special category designed to im- munize it from judicial scrutiny. This scheme, known as the Ninth Schedule, has been abused by legislators seeking electoral benefit. Simul- taneously, the country has been rocked by a series of public corruption scandals. As Parliament has sought to clean up its image by expelling dis- graced members, its actions have been challenged as unconstitutional, leading to a constitutional showdown between the legislative and judicial branches.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Inter-Religious and Inter-Caste Marriages in India Kumudin Das, K
    Dynamics of inter-religious and inter-caste marriages in India Kumudin Das, K. C. Das, T. K. Roy and P. K. Tripathy Abstract Caste and religion are integral components of Indian society since the time immemorial. These two systems create water tight compartment between communities and bring division, hatred and tension among various social groups. Marriages within the same caste and same religion is the norm of the Indian society. To think of marriages between different castes and different religions is a difficult and socially unacceptable proposition. Recently the process of modernization, democratization and development has brought lots of positive changes in Indian society. The major objectives of the present paper is to understand the spatial patterns and determinants of inter-caste and inter-religious marriages in India. The study uses the data of third round of National Family Health Survey( 2005-06)) having sample size of 43102 ever married couples. It is found that about 10 percent of the total marriages in India takes place between different castes while only 2.1 percent marriages are inter-religious. Key Words : Caste, religion, marriage, India Introduction The concept of caste system and religious discrimination are like a bane on the path of India's progress. For centuries Indian society has been divided on the basis of caste system and religion (Malhotra et al, 1977). The problem of caste system was so deep rooted that it took years for the Indians to come out of that idea. Even today also India is struggling to come out of this social menace. History reveals that efforts have been made by various social reformers and individuals whose name doesn't appear in the pages of history to make India free from the clutches of caste system, untouchability and race discrimination.
    [Show full text]
  • JUDGMENT [Per Ranjit More, J.]
    1 Marata(J) final.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 175 OF 2018 Dr. Jishri Laxmnarao Patil, ] Member the Indian Constitutionalist ] Council, Age 39 years, Occu : Advocate, ] Having oce at C/o 109/18, ] Esplanade Mansion, M. G. Road, ] Mumbai 400023. ...Petitioner ]..Petitioner. Versus 1. The Chief Minister ] of State of Maharashtra, Mantralaya, ] Mumbai – 400 032. ] ] 2. the Chief Secretary, ] State of Maharashtra, Mantralaya, ] Mumbai – 400 032. ]..Respondents. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6 OF 2019 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 175 OF 2018 Gawande Sachin Sominath. ] Age 32 years, Occ : Social Activist, ] R/o Plot No. 64, Lane No. 7, Gajanan Nagar ] Garkheda Parisar, Aurangabad. ]..Applicant. IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Dr. Jishri Laxmnarao Patil, ] Member the Indian Constitutionalist ] Council, Age 39 years, Occu : Advocate, ] Having oce at C/o 109/18, ] Esplanade Mansion, M. G. Road, ] Mumbai 400023. ]..Petitioner. patil-sachin. ::: Uploaded on - 08/07/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 15/07/2019 20:18:51 ::: 2 Marata(J) final.doc Versus 1. The Chief Minister ] of State of Maharashtra, Mantralaya, ] Mumbai – 400 032. ] ] 2. The Chief Secretary, ] State of Maharashtra, Mantralaya, ] Mumbai – 400 032. ] ] 3. Anandrao S. Kate, ] Address at Shoop no. 12 ] Building no. 26, A, ] Lullbhai Compound, ] mumbai-400043 ] ] 4. Akhil Bhartiya Maratha ] Mahasangh, ] Reg. No. 669/A, ] Though. Dilip B Jagatap ] ts Oce at.5, Navalkar ] Lane Prarthana Samaj ] Girgaon, Mumbai-04 ] ] 5. Vilas A. Sudrik, ] 265, “Shri Ganesh Chalwal, ] Juie Aunty Compound ] Santosh Nagar, Gaorgaon (E) ] Mumbai-64 ] ] 6. Ashok Patil ] A/G/001, Mehdoot Co-op Society, ] Mahada Vasahat Thane, 4000606 ] ] 7.
    [Show full text]
  • WELFARE SCHEMES for Obcs
    For the use of Members of Parliament Not for Publication Reference Note On WELFARE SCHEMES FOR OBCs 1 Reference Division (LARRDIS) Lok Sabha Secretariat New Delhi November 2014 The Reference Note is for personal use of the Members in the discharge of their Parliamentary duties, and is not for publication. This Service is not to be quoted as the source of information as it is based on the sources indicated at the end/in the text. This Service does not accept any responsibility for the accuracy or veracity of the information or views contained in the note/collection. WELFARE SCHEMES FOR OBCs An Overview The Second Backward Classes Commission, commonly known as the Mandal Commission, constituted under Article 340, submitted its Report in 1980. In the light of this Report, the Government of India had, vide O.M. dated 13 August 1990 of the Department of Personnel & Training, issued an order providing 27% reservation in Central Government posts for persons belonging to the Socially and Economically Backward Classes, also referred to as “Other Backward Classes” or OBCs. With the amendment of Article 15 of the Constitution in January, 2006 [Nothing in this article or in sub-clause (g) of clause (1) of article 19 shall prevent the State from making any special provision, by law, for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens or for the Scheduled Castes or the Scheduled Tribes in so far as such special provisions related to their admission to educational institutions including private educational institutions, whether aided or unaided by the State, other than minority educational institutions referred to in clause (1) of article 30] and the enactment of the Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admissions) Act in January, 2007, listing of Other Backward Classes has become relevant for admission in Central Educational Institutions also.
    [Show full text]
  • Reportable in the Supreme Court of India Civil
    1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 274 OF 2014 RAM SINGH & ORS. ...PETITIONER (S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA ...RESPONDENT (S) WITH W.P. (C) No. 261 of 2014, W.P. (C) No.278 of 2014, W.P. (C) No.297 of 2014, W.P. (C) No.298 of 2014, W.P. (C) No.305 of 2014, W.P. (C) No. 357 of 2014 & W.P. (C) No.955 of 2014 J U D G M E N T RANJAN GOGOI, J. 1. The challenge in the present group of writ petitions is to a Notification published in the Gazette of India dated 04.03.2014 by which the Jat Community has been included in the Central List of Backward Classes for the States of Bihar, 2 Gujarat, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, NCT of Delhi, Bharatpur and Dholpur districts of Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand. The said Notification was issued pursuant to the decision taken by the Union Cabinet on 02.03.2014 to reject the advice tendered by the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC) to the contrary on the ground that the said advice “did not adequately take into account the ground realities”. RESUME OF THE CORE FACTS : 2. Pursuant to several requests received from individuals, organisations and associations for inclusion of Jats in the Central List of Backward Classes for the States of Haryana, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh, the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC) studied their claims and submitted a report on 28.11.1997.
    [Show full text]
  • TYBA POLITICAL SCIENCE - PAPER VI DETERMINANTS of POLITICS of MAHARASHTRA SAMPLE Mcqs
    TYBA POLITICAL SCIENCE - PAPER VI DETERMINANTS OF POLITICS OF MAHARASHTRA SAMPLE MCQs Q.1 The relationship between business class and politics existed A. Even Pre-1947 B. Only Post-1947 C. Only after 1960s D. Only after 1990s Q.2 Which business house had intimate relationship with Indian national Congress in the pre-independence days A. Adani B. Ambani C. Bajaj D. Pendharkar Q.3 The commercial capital of India A. Delhi B. Mumbai C. Bangalore D. Calcutta Q.4 The business class is regarded as A. Religious interest group. B. Social interest group. C. Cultural interest group. D. Institutional interest group. Q.5 The associations of business classes are called A. Congress of commerce B. Forum of commerce C. Platform of commerce D. Chambers of commerce Q.6 The Indian Merchants Chamber was established in A. 1887 B. 1900 C. 1905 D. 1907 Q.7 Which nationalist leader had his influence in working of chambers of commerce in the pre-independence days? A. Netaji Bose B. Dadabhai Naoroji C. Sardar Patel D. Lokmanya Tilak Q.8 Which act provided 4 seats to the Indian business community in the Central Legislature A. Act of 1905 B. Act of 1910 C. Act of 1919 D. Act of 1930 Q.9 Which State has the largest no. of co-operative institutes in India? A. Bihar B. Manipur C. Maharashtra D. Assam Q.9 Who was the first CM of Maharashtra ? A. Y.B. Chavan B. V.P. Naik C. Vasantdada Patil D. A.R. Antulay Q.10 The no. of co-operative institutions in Maharashtra in 1961 were A.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Economy of a Dominant Caste
    Draft Political Economy of a Dominant Caste Rajeshwari Deshpande and Suhas Palshikar* This paper is an attempt to investigate the multiple crises facing the Maratha community of Maharashtra. A dominant, intermediate peasantry caste that assumed control of the state’s political apparatus in the fifties, the Marathas ordinarily resided politically within the Congress fold and thus facilitated the continued domination of the Congress party within the state. However, Maratha politics has been in flux over the past two decades or so. At the formal level, this dominant community has somehow managed to retain power in the electoral arena (Palshikar- Birmal, 2003)—though it may be about to lose it. And yet, at the more intricate levels of political competition, the long surviving, complex patterns of Maratha dominance stand challenged in several ways. One, the challenge is of loss of Maratha hegemony and consequent loss of leadership of the non-Maratha backward communities, the OBCs. The other challenge pertains to the inability of different factions of Marathas to negotiate peace and ensure their combined domination through power sharing. And the third was the internal crisis of disconnect between political elite and the Maratha community which further contribute to the loss of hegemony. Various consequences emerged from these crises. One was simply the dispersal of the Maratha elite across different parties. The other was the increased competitiveness of politics in the state and the decline of not only the Congress system, but of the Congress party in Maharashtra. The third was a growing chasm within the community between the neo-rich and the newly impoverished.
    [Show full text]