Stalking ^ a Contemporary Challenge for Forensic and Clinical Psychiatry

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stalking ^ a Contemporary Challenge for Forensic and Clinical Psychiatry BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY (2000), 176, 206^209 REVIEW ARTICLE Stalking ^ a contemporary challenge for forensic As often found with recently developed behavioural concepts, there is no consensus and clinical psychiatry about the exact definition of stalking. Most of the disagreement seems to centre on the degree of emphasis placed on the extent to J. H. KAMPHUIS and P. M. G. EMMELKAMP which the stalking evokes a subjective sense of threat. Generally, the various definitions have the following elements in common: &a) a pattern of intrusive behaviour, akin to harassment; &b) an implicit or explicit threat that emanates from the behavioural pattern; and &c) as a result, the target Background StalkingisStalking is causing Stalking gained major media attention by experiences considerable real fear &Meloy, pervasive andandintense intense personal suffering the often-spectacular accounts of celebrity 1998). In this article we use Meloy and stalking. Well-known cases from the United Gothard's definition: ``Stalking is typically andis an area of psychiatry thatisthat is States include the stalkers of Madonna and defined as the wilful, malicious, and re- currently overlooked. Jodie Foster. However, repeated intrusive peated following or harassing of another communication and harassment is by no person that threatens his or her safety'' Aims To reviewdemographic and means limited to fans targeting the rich &Meloy & Gothard, 1995, p. 258). clinical characteristics of stalkers as wellwellas as and famous. Much more common is the the psychological consequences for scenario in which stalker and `stalkee' had victims of stalking. some sort of `real' prior relationship: they NATURE AND PREVALENCE were often prior acquaintances or inti- OF STALKING MethodMethod A Medline and PsycLit search mates, but professional contacts can also was conducted on stalking, forensic give rise to stalking later &e.g. by clients of Stalking behaviour typically consists of in- psychiatry,personalitydisorders,psychiatry,personality disorders, de psychiatrists or lawyers; or by rejected job trusive following of a `target': for example, applicants). by placing one's self in front of the target's CleClerambault¨ rambault syndrome and erotomania, Forensic psychiatry has given scant at- home, or other unexpected and unwelcome with respect to the relevance of the tention to the phenomenon of stalking. appearances in their private domain. Stalk- articles selected for stalking. Few studies have investigated the psycholo- ers most often persecute their targets by un- gical make-up of stalkers, and to date only wanted communications, which can consist ResultsResults Stalkers arebestthoughtof as a one study &Pathe & Mullen, 1997) has re- of frequent &often nightly) telephone calls, heterogeneousgroupheterogeneous group whose behaviour ported on the psychological impact of stalk- letters, e-mail, graffiti, notes &e.g. left on can be motivated by differentforms of ing on its victims. There are no reports of the target's car), or packages &e.g. gifts, the development of any specific treatment pictures). Somewhat more extreme forms psychopathology,includingpsychopathology, including psychosis and programmes, either for stalkers or for their include ordering goods and services in the severe personalitydisorders. victims. This article aims to give an overview victim's name and charging to the victim's of stalking and its clinical ramifications. account, placing false advertisements or Conclusions There is a clear need to announcements, ordering funeral wreaths, arrive at a consensus on a typologyoftypology of CURRENT DEFINITION spreading rumours about the victim, start- stalkers and associated diagnostic criteria. ing numerous frivolous law suits, smearing The effectiveness of psychological and Partly as a result of publications in the med- the victim's home or destroying or moving ia on stalking of celebrities, research into their property, threatening the victim with pharmacologicalpharmacologicaltreatments treatments have not yet marital violence, and anti-stalking laws in violence, or actually attacking them. Stalk- beenbeeninvestigated.Treatment investigated.Treatment may need to some countries, mental health workers have ers sometimes involve third parties, which be supplemented with external incentives recently started to study stalkers. It became leads to victimisation by association of provided by the legal system. apparent that a proportion of stalkers suf- their family, friends, colleagues, lawyers, fered from erotomania. Originally, eroto- psychiatrists or psychologists, etc. Stalking Declaration of interest None. mania &or de CleClerambault'sÂrambault's syndrome) was can be of brief duration, but it can also last a term reserved for women who held the for many years. Research from the United delusional belief that a man, typically of a States shows that in slightly over half the higher social class or social esteem, was cases, stalking ceases within one year, while deeply in love with them. However, a delu- in one-quarter of the cases it lasts for 2±5 sional disorder of the erotomanic type, as it years &Tjaden & Thoenness, 1997). is currently classified in DSM±IV &Ameri- In some cases, the violence may escalate can Psychiatric Association, 1994), only ac- until the stalker actually murders the victim counts for a very limited subset of episodes and/or his/her children. In the United States, of stalking; stalking can result from many it is estimated that between 21% and different motivations and constellations of 25% of forensic stalking cases culminate psychopathological symptoms. ininsignificant violence &Harmon et aletal,, 206206 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. 29 Sep 2021 at 15:48:13, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use. STALKING 1995; Meloy & Gothard, 1995). The inci- Gothard, 1995; Harmon et aletal, 1995; Mul- knowledge of the identity of the stalker. dence of murder or manslaughter in stalk- lenlen et aletal, 1999), all conducted from forensic Finally, Mullen et aletal &1999) distinguish five ing cases in the United States is estimated settings. The findings suggest the following types of stalkers: &a) the rejected stalker, at 2% &Meloy, 1996). Fritz &1995) showed tentative profile of the `typical' stalker: a who has had a relationship with the victim that 90% of women killed by their ex- single or divorced man in his thirties, often and who is often characterised by a mixture husband had previously been stalked. unemployed, of above-average intelligence, of revenge and desire for reconciliation; &b) These numbers should probably not be with a criminal and psychiatric history. the stalker seeking intimacy, which includes extrapolated unreservedly to the European However, the overall &composite) sample individuals with erotomanic delusions; &c) situation: for one reason, because of differ- does not represent the more ordinary the incompetent stalker ± usually intellec- ences in the availability and possession of &non-&non-criminal)criminal) stalking cases. The attrition tually limited and socially incompetent in- firearms.firearms. at eachateachstep of the sequence: stalking com- dividuals; &d) the resentful stalker, who Obtaining reliable data regarding the plaint±plaint±policepolice report±arrest±criminal pros- stalks to frighten and distress the victim; prevalence and incidence of stalking is a ecution, makes it at least doubtful whether and finally &e) the predatory stalker, who formidable international problem. Inconsis- the entire spectrum of stalkers is adequately is preparing a sexual attack. In addition to tent definition and demarcation of the con- represented. Stalkers form a heterogeneous these categories, there are reports on the cept is partly responsible for this state of group with widely different psychopatho- so-called `false victimisation syndrome', affairs. In some European countries stalk- logical motivations, and it is unlikely that during which the `victim' pretends to have ing by itself is not considered a distinct legal the erotomanic stalker, the psychopathic been stalked, by pursuing herself, in order offence which compounds the problem of stalker and the `other cluster B stalker' to gain attention &Pathe et aletal, 1999).,1999). monitoring and tracking cases for both can be treated equally. There is a clear need to derive a consensus police and forensic researchers. As a result, on a typology of stalkers, with associated estimates of prevalence and incidence are diagnostic criteria. At present, there is no based on very few, predominantly Ameri- Typology of stalkers evidence that one proposed typology is can studies. The US National Violence Several authors have proposed stalker superior to another. The typology eventually Against Women Survey contacted 8000 typologies &Zona et aletal, 1993; Harmon etet agreed upon should have clear implications women and 8000 men by telephone, and alal, 1995; Wright et aletal, 1996; Mullen et aletal,, for treatment. asked them about stalking experiences 1999) based on purported psychological &Tjaden & Thoenness, 1997): 8% of the characteristics of the stalker and/or the women and 2% of the men had been relationship between the stalker and the Personality of stalkers stalked at some point in their life. This victim. Most authors agree on the import- To date, no systematic research has investi- research also illustrates that criminal stalk- ance of the distinction between stalking in gated the motivations and personality of ing cases merely reflect the tip of the ice-ice-
Recommended publications
  • What's the Difference Between Harassment and / Or Stalking?
    What’s the difference between Harassment and / or stalking? - The key is to think OBSESSION. Why is it difficult to separate stalking and harassment? • There are similarities in what constitutes harassment and what is stalking. • They are often discussed together and don’t separate. • There is an overlap, and some people may be a victim of both. • A lot of the abuse techniques are the same, but become stalking when used more aggressively, more threateningly and more obsessively. • There is overlap two legal definitions overlap. Definitions Stalking – Stalking is harassment that involves a course of conduct that amounts to stalking, either involving the fear of violence or involving serious alarm or distress. The protection of Freedoms Act 2012 and in the Protection from harassment Act (1997). Stalking victims may like they have their freedom curtailed and feel constantly like they need to be careful. It causes extreme alarm and distress and it is repeated abuse. Harassment - Protection from Harassment Act (1997 section 2) explains that harassment causes harm or distress, putting people in fear in any reasonable person and of fear of violence, repeated attempts of imposed communications. The key differences? Think stalking if the abuse has become an ‘obsession’, if it indicates fixation, is excessively repeated and aggressive in its nature. Data • SafeLives observed that 57% of all high risk cases of domestic abuse had stalking and harassment. Of which, over half said this was at a severe level. Only 14% said that there was no violence. • A Suzy Lampard report suggested 25% of all cases of stalking are reported to the police.
    [Show full text]
  • Technology, Intimate Partner Stalking and Advocacy
    A High-Tech Twist on Abuse: Technology, Intimate Partner Stalking, and Advocacy By Cindy Southworth, Shawndell Dawson, Cynthia Fraser, and Sarah Tucker Safety Net: National Safe & Strategic Technology Project at the National Network to End Domestic Violence Fund authors commissioned by Copyright © 2005 Violence Against Women Online Resources June, 2005 A High-Tech Twist on Abuse: Technology, Intimate Partner Stalking, and Advocacy Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 2 Research and Scope ....................................................................................................................... 3 The Use of Technology to Stalk ..................................................................................................... 5 Telephone Technologies ........................................................................................................ 5 Location &Surveillance Technologies ................................................................................... 6 Computer &Internet Technology ........................................................................................... 7 Advocacy Response: What Can Advocates Do? ............................................................................ 8 Survivor Advocacy ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stalking and Attachment Theory: Causes and Management
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects CUNY Graduate Center 9-2020 Stalking and Attachment Theory: Causes and Management Zoe Turner The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/4048 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: AcademicWorks@cuny.edu STALKING AND ATTACHMENT THEORY: CAUSES AND MANAGEMENT by ZOE TURNER A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Psychology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2020 i © 2020 ZOE TURNER All Rights Reserved ii Stalking and Attachment Theory: Causes and Management by Zoe Turner This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Psychology in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _______________ ____________________________________ Date Phil Yanos, Ph.D. Chair of Examining Committee _______________ ____________________________________ Date Richard Bodner, Ph.D. Executive Officer Supervisory Committee: Elizabeth Jeglic, Ph.D. Louis Schlesinger, Ph.D. Philip Erdberg, Ph.D. Ali Khadivi, Ph.D. THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT Stalking and Attachment Theory: Causes and Management by Zoe Turner Advisor: Phil Yanos, Ph.D. Stalking is an issue that has drawn increasing attention over the past four decades. Approximately 6 million Americans report being the victims of stalking each year. The psychological and physical effects of stalking can be severe, ranging from anxiety and depression to physical harm and even death.
    [Show full text]
  • Stalking Any Individual During the Aggravated Stalking Penalties [MCL 750.411I] • Entering Onto Or Remaining on Property Owned, Leased, Term of Probation
    • Appearing at the victim’s workplace or residence. • Refrain from stalking any individual during the Aggravated stalking penalties [MCL 750.411i] • Entering onto or remaining on property owned, leased, term of probation. Aggravated stalking is a felony punishable for not or occupied by the victim. • Refrain from having any contact with the victim more than 5 years or a fine of not more than A Citizen’s Guide • Contacting the victim by telephone. of the offense. $10,000, or both. • Sending mail or electronic communications (such as • Be evaluated to determine the need for psychiatric, to Michigan’s email or text messaging) to the victim. psychological, or social counseling and if, If the victim was less than 18 years of age at any • Placing an object on, or delivering an object to, determined appropriate by the court, to receive time during the individual’s course of conduct and the Anti-Stalking Laws property owned, leased, or occupied by the victim. psychiatric, psychological, or social counseling individual is 5 or more years older than the victim, by at his or her own expense. imprisonment for not more than 10 years or a fine of Do not minimize the danger of being stalked. Stalkers not more than $15,000, or both. don’t just stop this harassing behavior. Victims should In a prosecution for a violation of this section, evidence seek assistance from advocates, law enforcement and that the defendant continued to engage in a course The court may place an individual convicted of violating the courts to intervene to stop the stalking.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMON FEELINGS WHEN EXPERIENCING INTIMATE to Be with You Day and Night
    NOTES • What You Can Do: If you want company, don’t hesitate to ask people you trust COMMON FEELINGS WHEN EXPERIENCING INTIMATE to be with you day and night. You may want to make your physical environment PARTNER VIOLENCE & STALKING ________________________________________________________________________ feel safer (for example, moving, making your home more secure and/or getting ________________________________________________________________________ to know your neighbors better). Safety planning is a good way to prepare. If possible, check out the main CARE brochure for some tips and talk you your SHOCK AND NUMBNESS CARE advocate for more information. ________________________________________________________________________ • How You May Feel: Confused, easily overwhelmed, unsure of how to feel or ________________________________________________________________________ VULNERABILITY, DISTRUST what to do, spacey or out of it. • How You May Feel: That you’re at the mercy of your own emotions or the actions ________________________________________________________________________ • What You Can Do: Be aware that these are normal reactions to trauma and of others; unsure of who to trust or how to trust yourself; suspicious and cautious. abuse. Each person handles crisis differently, so think of things that helped ________________________________________________________________________ you get through crises in the past. Get help to sort out what you would like to • What You Can Do: Trust your instincts in regards to who you want to talk with do and how you may want to organize your time, thoughts and decisions. Be ________________________________________________________________________ about what happened to you. Try to talk with people whom you have found to be compassionate toward yourself and give yourself time to heal from past and/or the most dependable in the past, select those who have been good listeners and ongoing abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyberbullying, Cyberstalking, Sexting & the Law
    HUMAN SCIENCES Advancing Bullying Awareness Cyberbullying, Cyberstalking, Sexting & the Law ► In this third of a five-part series, you will learn Alabama’s laws and penalties related to cyber harassment and how they apply to youth. Parents and guardians often think that cyberbullying and sexting only have short-term social and psychological consequences for their children. But cyber harassment, stalking, or forwarding sexually explicit photos to peers can have serious legal consequences for youth and families. The consequences can impact both the victim and the one doing the harrassment. It is important, therefore, for families to be aware of the laws that address cyberbullying, cyberstalking, and sexting. This article will help parents/guardians understand the legal definitions of cyberbullying, cyberstalking, and sexting, along with the Alabama laws that govern those behaviors. Cyberbullying, Cyberstalking, and Sexting Cyberbullying, also referred to legally as cyber someone shared online (home address, license harassment, is defined as using the internet (social plate number, etc.), and technological attacks media, email, etc.), cell phones, or other technology (such as shutting down a person’s social media to send text or images intended to hurt or embarrass account or creating a social media account under the another person. Cyberbullying includes sending hurtful victim’s name). words and images, pretending to be another person online, sending hate mail, stalking, and doing other Cyberbullying and cyberstalking can both be connected harmful behaviors. When people talk about cyberbullying to sexting abuse. Sexting is sharing or forwarding in general, cyberstalking is not often discussed, but it is sexually explicit messages and photos (nude or nearly also a serious issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Information for Stalking Victims
    Kansas Victims’ Bill of Rights Kansas Domestic and Sexual Violence Hotline Numbers 1. Victims should be treated with courtesy, compassion and with respect for their dignity and privacy and Kansas Crisis Hotline should suffer the minimum of necessary inconvenience (888) 363-2287 from their involvement with the criminal justice system. Atchison (800) 367-7075 or (913) 367-0363 Information for 2. Victims should receive, through formal and informal Dodge City (620) 225-6510 procedures, prompt and fair redress for the harm which El Dorado (800) 870-6967 or (316) 321-7104 they have suffered. Emporia (800) 825-1295 or (620) 342-1870 3. Information regarding the availability of criminal Garden City (620) 275-5911 Stalking Victims restitution, recovery of damages in a civil cause of Great Bend (866) 792-1885 or (620) 792-1885 action, the crime victims compensation fund and other Hays (800) 794-4624 or (785) 625-3055 remedies and the mechanisms to obtain such remedies Hutchinson (800) 701-3630 or (620) 663-2522 should be made available to victims. Iola (620) 365-7566 4. Information should be made available to victims about Kansas City, KS their participation in criminal proceedings and the El Centro, Inc. ¡Si Se Puede! (dv) scheduling, progress and ultimate disposition of the (913) 677-0177 proceedings. Friends of Yates / Joyce H. Williams Center (dv) 5. The views and concerns of victims should be (913) 321-0951 ascertained and the appropriate assistance provided Kansas City, MO throughout the criminal process. KCAVP (816) 561-0550 6. When the personal interests of victims are affected, MOCSA (sv) (816) 531-0233 the views or concerns of the victim should, when Lawrence appropriate and consistent with criminal law and GaDuGi Safe Center (sv) (785) 843-8985 procedure, be brought to the attention of the court.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Aid Report Into Online Abuse, Harassment and Stalking
    VIRTUAL WORLD, REAL FEAR Women’s Aid report into online abuse, harassment and stalking www.womensaid.org.uk Report Author CONTENTS Clare Laxton Forewords 3 Polly Neate, Chief Executive, Women’s Aid With thanks to: Caroline Criado-Perez Defi nition of terms 5 Hilary Fisher Siân Hawkins Introduction 6 The links between online abuse and domestic violence 8 The impact of online abuse, harassment and stalking 10 Response of social media providers 13 Response of the police 14 Response of criminal justice agencies 15 Culture of misogyny 16 Support for survivors 18 Conclusion and recommendations 19 Acknowledgments Women’s Aid would like to thank everyone who attended the online stalking, harassment and abuse Production and Design: conference in September 2013 – without your Susannah Marwood contribution this report would not have been Published by: possible. Thank you also to Katie Ross for organising Women’s Aid Federation of England, the conference, the entire Women’s Aid staff for PO Box 391, Bristol, BS99 7WS making it possible and Avon for sponsoring the © Women’s Aid 2014 conference. ISBN 978-0-907817-77-2 Women’s Aid is the national domestic violence charity that supports a network of around 300 local services working to end domestic violence against women and children in England. Our member services are integrated domestic violence service providers delivering a range of holistic services for women experiencing domestic violence and their children. Keeping the voices of survivors at the heart of its work, Women’s Aid campaigns for better support for women and children, provides training and resources for professionals and delivers a package of vital 24 hour lifeline services through publications, websites and the National Domestic Violence Helpline (run in partnership with Refuge).
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Violence, Stalking, and Antistalking Legislation
    NT OF ME J T US U.S. Department of Justice R T A I P C E E D B O J C S Office of Justice Programs F A V M F O I N A C I J S R E BJ G O OJJ DP O F PR National Institute of Justice JUSTICE National Institute of Justice Research Report Domestic Violence, Stalking, and Antistalking Legislation An Annual Report to Congress under the Violence Against Women Act The studies reported here were mandated by Title IV, the Violence Against Women Act, of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994. The enabling legislation is: SUBTITLE F—NATIONAL STALKER AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE REDUCTION SECTION 40610, REPORT TO CONGRESS, WHICH STATES THE FOLLOWING: The Attorney General shall submit to the Congress an annual report, beginning one year after the date of the enactment of the Act, that provides information concerning the incidence of stalking and domestic violence, and evaluates the effectiveness of antistalking efforts and legislation. Domestic Violence, Stalking, and Antistalking Legislation An Annual Report to Congress under the Violence Against Women Act National Institute of Justice A Publication of the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice April 1996 U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice Jeremy Travis, J.D. Director This report was edited by Mary Graham, NIJ publications manager, with support from Jolene Hernon, Anne Pritchett, and Patti Schwartz, Cygnus Corporation. The National Institute of Justice acknowl- edges with thanks the contributions of the following reviewers: Office of Policy Development, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • STALKING an Old Behavior, a New Crime
    FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY 0193-953X/99 $8.00 + .00 STALKING An Old Behavior, A New Crime J. Reid Meloy, PhD If there is a heart of darkness in the desire to bond with another, it is stalking. Typically defined as "the willful, malicious, and repeated following and harassing of another person that threatens his or her safety" (p 258),30 stalking is now a crime in all 50 states and a federal offense in the United States, Canada, Australia, and Great Britain. Although first criminalized less than a decade ago in California, the behavior is very old; "longing on a large scale is what makes history" (p 11).4 Forensic cases that predated the crime of stalking have shaped the contours of our law. The murder of Tarasoff at the University of California, Berkeley, in 1969 by the erotomanically deluded Poddar brought to the mental health profession third-party warnings,2° and the attempted assassination of President Reagan in 1981 by Hinckley who triangulated his obsessional pursuit of Jodie Foster, changed the federal insanity defense.3 The author30 has used the term obsessional following in 3 clinical research ! to more rigorously operationalize stalking behavior because it seems to capture the most common cognitive pattern (obses­ sion) and the most common prohibited act (following) of stalkers. This work was supported by Forensis, Inc. with a grant from the Susan Stein Shiva Foundation. From the Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego; and the University of San Diego School of Law, San Diego, California THE PSYCHIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA VOLUME 22 • NUMBER 1 • MARCH 1999 85 86 MELOY EPIDEMIOLOGY The Center for Policy Research45 conducted a random probability telephone survey of 16,000 men and women in the United States, and, using a carefully constructed and behaviorally defined series of ques­ tions, found that 8% of adult women and 2% of adult men have been stalked sometime in their lives.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Internet – Addressing the Challenge
    5. Internet – Addressing the challenge “To deny people their human rights is to challenge their very humanity.” Nelson Mandela, Nobel Peace Prize laureate of 1993, anti-apartheid activist, President of South Africa 1994-1999 “The rights of every man are diminished when the rights of one man are threatened.” John F. Kennedy, President of the USA 1961-1963 CHECKLIST FACT SHEET 19 – CYBERCRIME: SPAM, MALWARE, FRAUD AND SECURITY Have you set up strong different passwords for your accounts and configured two-factor security? Have you explored security settings for your devices/accounts? Are your operating system and your applications up to date? Have you made a backup of your most important data? CHECKLIST FACT SHEET 20 – LABELLING AND FILTERING Have you thought about the cultural and moral implications of filtering? Do you know the difference between a “black list” and a “white list”? Are you familiar with the most commonly used labelling systems for children’s content, and what they signify? CHECKLIST FACT SHEET 21 – ONLINE HARASSMENT: BULLYING, STALKING AND TROLLING Do you have a clear family or school policy in place so that children understand the repercussions when they are involved in online harassment? Do you protect your personal details sufficiently? Many online problems are caused through ill- advised sharing of photos and information. Have you investigated how to build better social and emotional skills (otherwise known as social literacy) to overcome the anonymity and “facelessness” of online communication that facilitate bullying,
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Violence and Stalking
    Facts about Domestic Violence and Stalking WHAT IS STALKING? Stalking is defined by law by the federal government.i When an abuser acts in such a way as to intentionally create a fear of harm or death for the victim, that is stalking. This could take the form of a fear of harm, injury or death for themselves, a relative, or any third party. Abusers who use stalking to terrorize and threaten create substantial emotional distress for their victims, family members and third parties. DID YOU KNOW? STALKING AND FEMICIDE: • A 2011 survey found 5.1 million women and • 76% of women murdered by an intimate partner 2.4 million men had been stalked the previous were stalked first; 85% of women who survived year.ii murder attempts were stalked.viii • 1 in every 6 U.S. women and 1 out of every 19 • 89% of femicide victims who had been physically U.S. men have been stalked in their lifetime.iii assaulted before their murder were also stalked in • Nearly 3 out of 4 victims of stalking know their the last year prior to their murder.ix stalkers in some capacity. The most common • 54% of femicide victims reported stalking to the relationship between the victim and perpetrator police before they were killed by their stalkers.x is a current or former intimate partner.iv • People aged 18-24 have the highest rate of IMPACT ON VICTIMS: v stalking victimization. • 1 in 7 stalking victims has been forced to move as • Although stalking is a crime in all 50 states, less a result of their victimization.xi than 1/3 of states classify stalking as a felony • 1 in 8 stalking victims has reported losing work if it is a first offense, leaving stalking victims because of the stalking.
    [Show full text]