10/18/2018
10/18/2018 Gardiner Dam’s Historic Movement and Ongoing Stability Evaluation
Jody Scammell, M.Sc., P. Eng. Director, Dam Safety and Major Structures
1 10/18/2018
2 10/18/2018
Outline
• South Saskatchewan River Project Introduction • Lake Diefenbaker Reservoir • Gardiner Dam – Foundation Conditions – Major Components – Movements – Previous Stability Evaluations • Grant Devine Dam Stability Evaluation • Expected Results – Not expected results
3 10/18/2018
SSRP Introduction
Gardiner Dam
Qu’Appelle River Dam
4 10/18/2018
SSRP Introduction
• 1894 first consideration for large irrigation • 1968 completed • Total cost $120 million (1968 value) • Replacement value $2.41 Billion • Owned and operated by Water Security Agency • Operation, maintenance and monitoring complete by 8 onsite staff
5 10/18/2018
Lake Diefenbaker Reservoir
6 10/18/2018
Reservoir Drainage Basin
• Three Regions • Effective Distribution – Eastern Rockies 50% Area / 80% Flow – Foothills – Prairies 50% Area / 20% Flow • 60% Snowmelt • 38% Rainfall runoff • 2% Glacier melt
7 10/18/2018
Reservoir Operation
• Runoff patterns – Low winter flow – Spring peak, April – Summer peak, May/June – Recession, Aug/Sept
8 10/18/2018
Reservoir
• Lake Diefenbaker • 225 km long (near Eston, SK) • 760 km shoreline • Volume 9.25x109 m3 • Usable Storage 3.95x109 m3 • Up to 58 m deep
9 10/18/2018
2013 Release
• Largest flow released • 1600 m3/s spillway • 2000 m3/s total 6000 558 Lake Diefenbaker April 1, 2013 to March 31, 2014
5000 556
4000 554
3000 552 Inflow Flow (m3/s) Flow Outflow Elevation (m) Elevation median 2000 550
1000 548
0 546
10 10/18/2018
Gardiner Dam
11 10/18/2018
12 10/18/2018 Gardiner Dam Main (River) Major Components Embankment
Plateau Embankment
Coteau Creek Embankment
Tunnels
Spillway
13 10/18/2018 Gardiner Dam Embankments • Three zoned compacted- earth filled embankments Coteau Creek Embankment • Total Length 5000 m • Crest Elevation 562.4 m • Max height 64 m • Upper Slopes 2H:1V • Lower Slopes 85H:1V
Plateau Main (River) Embankment Embankment
14 10/18/2018 Gardiner Dam Foundation
15 10/18/2018 Gardiner Dam Foundation • Till • River Sand – Eroded except on – In valley bottom abutments • Bedrock – Bearpaw Formation – Snakebite Shale – Ardkenneth Sandstone
16 10/18/2018 Gardiner Dam Foundation • Snakebite Shale Description – Upper Cretaceous Origin – Marine Deposited – Dark Grey Shale, flat horizontal lying strata – Jointed, Slickensided, and Bentonite seams – Highly Plastic – Presheared
17 10/18/2018 Gardiner Dam Foundation
18 10/18/2018 Gardiner Dam Foundation
19 10/18/2018 Gardiner Dam Movement
20 10/18/2018 Gardiner Dam Horizontal Movement • Occurring since start of construction • Shear plane located in shale foundation near the contact with the underlying sandstone – Approximately 114 m below the crest of the dam El.448 m
21 10/18/2018 Gardiner Dam Horizontal Movement • Movement rates and magnitude vary by position from the dam crest • Maximum movement rate and magnitude is occurring at toe of main embankment
22 10/18/2018
Historic Instrumentation
Horizontal Movement • The movement is occurring on a defined shear plane in the shale
23 10/18/2018 Gardiner Dam Horizontal Movement • Movement rate generally slowing • On an annual frequency the movement rates indicate a trend with the reservoir
24 10/18/2018
Historic Instrumentation
Time Comparison • The piezometric level fluctuates with reservoir
25 10/18/2018
Previous Analysis
• 1948 -1953 • 1979 – Limit Equilibrium – Finite element stress – Total Stress Analysis deformation analysis • 1954-1965 – Computational limited – Limit Equilibrium • 1980-2009 – Effective Stress Analysis – Simple mechanical model with a spring and – Redesigned as the back damper to predict analysis of local slopes movement related to historic movement
26 10/18/2018
Previous Analysis
• 2009 -2013 • It appeared there is a • Analytical Model correlation between total stress loading on the shale • Simple sliding block and pore water dissipation. evaluation
27 10/18/2018
Previous Analysis
What does this all mean Next Steps • We don’t understand the • Detailed Finite Difference movement mechanisms Model (FDM) • The stability of the structure • Understand long term is not fully understood deformations and impacts on structures
28 10/18/2018
Detailed FDM Analysis Moving Forward
Grant Devine (Alameda) Dam 2011-2014 • Similar problem as Gardiner • Process will be very similar but was moving faster
29 10/18/2018
Detailed FDM Analysis Moving Forward
Grant Devine (Alameda) Dam • Stop construction to • Unanticipated shear redesign displacements during • Added toe berms construction
Glacial Till (Foral/Battleford) Formation)
Bedrock – interbedded sandstones, siltstones and clay shales (Ravenscrag Formation)
30 10/18/2018
Detailed FDM Analysis Moving Forward
Detailed Geological Framework • Need to understand the • Develop a representative materials in the foundation model
31 10/18/2018
Detailed FDM Analysis Moving Forward
32 10/18/2018
Detailed FDM Analysis Moving Forward
Start with a 2D • 2D model is required to – Establish appropriate minimize complications constitutive model of soil • Calibrate model • Once model behavior is – Lab tested material understood then move on to properties 3D – Actual deformation measurements
33 10/18/2018
Detailed FEM Analysis Moving Forward
Move forward with 3D • Start with properties from calibrated 2D model • Calibrate again
– Actual deformation 3D FLAC Model measurements – Measured porewater pressure
Oblique Section – Shear Strain Contours34 Cut Along Oblique Section 10/18/2018
Expected Results
• Understanding of long term • Limitations movements – Not expecting be able to • Understanding of the estimate annual stability of the structure displacement • Estimate of total – A traditional Factor of deformation and rate Safety is not possible • Impact on the ancillary structures – Spillway – Relief Well Drainage Conduit
35
10/18/2018
Summary
• The dam is performing well • With over 50 years of • Monitoring and satisfactory performance maintenance activities are there is valuable lessons to ongoing be learned from this project • The embankment is moving • This project is a valuable downstream with rates asset to the province and slowing will remain to be in the future
36 10/18/2018
37