DOCSLIB.ORG

The Pollinators of Ohio and Michigan Populations of Eastern Prairie Fringed Orchid (Plantanthera Leucophaea)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Pollinators of Ohio and Michigan Populations of Eastern Prairie Fringed Orchid (Plantanthera Leucophaea) Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................1 Orchid Pollination ...............................................................................................2 Materials and Methods ......................................................................................... 3 Study sites........................................................................................................... 3 Pickerel Creek Wildlife Area ........................................................................ 3 Huron County # 1 Site, Michigan.................................................................. 3 Pollinator Activity .............................................................................................. 4 Fruit Set.............................................................................................................. 5 Results..................................................................................................................... 5 Discussion............................................................................................................... 9 Eastern prairie fringed orchid pollinators ......................................................... 9 Non-pollinators ................................................................................................ 11 Unlikely pollinators.......................................................................................... 11 Pollen thieves ................................................................................................... 11 Hawkmoth behavior ......................................................................................... 11 Conclusions and Recommendations .................................................................. 12 Acknowledgements.............................................................................................. 13 Literature Cited................................................................................................... 14 Appendix Platanthera leucophaea abstract for Michigan ................................................ 16 i Introduction Eastern prairie fringed orchid counties (Holmes, Lucas, Sandusky, and (Platanthera leucophaea [Nuttall] Lindley) Wayne) and one west-central county is a federally threatened species known from (Clark). It has been listed as a state approximately 55 populations in seven threatened species by the Ohio Department Midwestern states, primarily Wisconsin, of Natural Resources, Division of Natural Illinois, and Michigan (Bowles 1993). Areas and Preserves, since 1986 (ODNAP Although this may seem like an adequate 1986). Prior to 1986, it was listed first as number of populations within a reasonable extirpated in 1980 and then as endangered range of the Midwest, the majority of these from 1982-1985 following the discovery of populations are small, unprotected, and the Lucas and Wayne county populations. erratic in their persistence. In addition, few Historic records from Ottawa County (North occurrences are in good quality habitat. At Bass Island–1980), Auglaize County (1901), present, only four legally protected Erie County (1916), and Montgomery populations in the U.S. are considered to County (1800s) have not been relocated, have high viability (Bowles 1993). despite recent surveys. There are also Platanthera leucophaea was formerly literature references to historic occurrences widespread in prairies and wetlands east of in Champaign and Franklin counties (Braun the Mississippi River (Bowles 1993). Its 1967) as well as Fairfield County (Schaffner historic range included 13 states extending 1932). None of the extant populations occur from eastern Missouri and Iowa to northwest in counties where there are historic records Pensylvania, western New York, and or references. southern Ontario, with disjunct populations A necessary step in the recovery of in Oklahoma, New Jersey, Virginia, and Platanthera leucophaea is obtaining specific Maine (Bowles 1993). In the U.S., knowledge about its reproductive biology Platanthera leucophaea has declined more including information regarding its than 70% from original county records due pollinators. Important information such as to habitat destruction from agriculture, the role of pollinators in relation to seed-set wetland drainage, and natural succession and their role in maintaining viable orchid (Bowles 1993). This drastic decline led the populations is lacking. Hawkmoths U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to list (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) have been Platanthera leucophaea as a federally identified as primary pollinators of threatened species in 1989 (U.S. Fish and Platanthera leucohaea in Illinois and Wildlife Service 1989). Wisconsin (Robertson 1893, Bowles 1983, In Michigan, Eastern prairie fringed and Cuthrell 1994), however little is known orchid was known from 21 counties of their population or habitat status. To our historically (Case 1987). Currently there are knowledge, no Platanthera leucophaea a total of 14 extant populations from nine pollinator studies have previously been counties (Natural Heritage Biological and conducted in Ohio or Michigan. Conservation Data System, 1999). The Pollinator loss or decline can affect species has been listed as a state endangered plants in several ways including most species by the Michigan Department of obviously the loss of, or reduced, seed-set Natural Resources since the inception of the (Tepedino 1979). The production of less Endangered Species Act in 1974. The vigorous offspring is also possible due to populations are found in two main habitat effects of inbreeding depression resulting types: lakeplain prairies and bogs. from a higher percentage of seed-set through In Ohio, Platanthera leucophaea is self-pollination (Kearns and Inouye 1997). presently known to occur in four northern Pollinators may be threatened by habitat alteration including destruction of larval and Eastern prairie fringed orchid pollinators - 1 adult food sources, introduction of alien distance between the viscidia (sticky pads at pollinators, and/or the use of pesticides. the base of the pollinia that become attached The identification and status of to the pollen vector) become important plant pollinators of Eastern prairie fringed orchid characters by governing pollinator position has been identified as a priority research in relation to various floral parts during task in the Federal Recovery Plan for this floral visitation (Inoue 1985, 1986). Moths species (Bowles 1993). This study was with a long proboscis may be able to reach conducted in order to begin to identify the nectar without affecting pollination and are pollinators of Eastern prairie fringed orchid therefore labeled pollen “thieves”. Pollinia in Michigan and Ohio. attachment at the proboscis and the dorsal thorax appears to be the usual situation for pollen vectors of North American orchids Orchid Pollination (Catling and Catling 1991). For example, in The floral biology of the Orchidaceae P. bifolia (L.), the viscidia are spaced close has fascinated biologists for many years together and adhere to pollen vectors at the because of the pollination mechanism base of the proboscis. This type of pollinia exhibited by members of this group (Cole attachment allows for a greater number and and Firmage 1984). Two orchid genera that more diverse set of pollinators, and have attracted considerable attention are pollinator morphologies are not quite as Platanthera L.C. Richard and Habenaria important (Nilsson 1983). Wildenow, which together comprise more Eastern prairie fringed orchid ranges than 800 species of orchids (Nilsson). Most from 20-100 cm tall, producing a terminal of these orchids possess adaptations that and determinate inflorescence with between indicate lepidopteran pollination (van der 5 and 40 flowers comprised of three creamy- Pijl and Dodson, 1966; Catling and Catling white petals backed by three pale green 1991), although other insect taxa have been sepals. The lower petal is modified into a reported as pollinators for some species broad lip which is deeply 3-lobed. Each of (Thien and Utech, 1970; Cole and Firmage the lobes is deeply incised which produces 1984; Patt et al. 1989). the fringed appearance. The lower lip also Most orchid species within these two bears a slender, curving spur that extends up genera can be categorized as either moth- to 5 cm and contains a supply of nectar. The pollinated or butterfly-pollinated species flower also produces a sweet fragrance most based on specialized plant morphologies and pronounced at dusk when the hawkmoths adaptations linked with their primary are beginning their feeding flights. pollinator groups (van der Pijl and Dodson, These orchid morphologies are adapted 1966). Several species of Lepidoptera are to pollination by Lepidoptera. The white, known to be important pollen vectors for nocturnally fragrant flowers help pollinators Platanthera. Pollinator specificity is to locate the plants. Once in close proximity dictated by the placement and positioning of to the flowers, the white-fringed lip directs pollinia (packets of pollen) on the vector. approaching moths to the spur and the Removal of pollinia by attachment to the nectar. The close spacing of the visicidia eyes is one way that pollination takes place allow moths to pick up pollinia at the base in Platanthera and Habenaria (Smith 1975; of their tongue. Only those moths with Smith and Snow 1976, Catling 1984; Inoue compatible tongues
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Perspective Where Might Be Many Tropical Insects?
    Biological Conservation 233 (2019) 102–108 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Perspective Perspective: Where might be many tropical insects? T ⁎ Daniel H. Janzen , Winnie Hallwachs Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104, United States of America ABSTRACT I have been watching the gradual and very visible decline of Mexican and Central American insect density and species richness since 1953 and Winnie since 1978. The loss is very real for essentially all higher taxa, and the reasons are very evident: intense forest and agricultural simplification of very large areas, massive use of pesticides, habitat fragmentation, and at least since the 1980's, ever-increasing climate change in temperature, rainfall, and synchronization of seasonal cues. There is no ecological concept suggesting that this biodiversity and habitat impoverishment is restricted to this portion of the Neotropics, and our 50 years of occasional visits to other parts of the tropics suggest the same. We are losing most of the insect community that is still in the cloud forests due to the drying of the tops of tropical mountains, just as we are losing the huge expanses of insect communities that once occupied the fertile soils, weather, and water of the lowland tropics. Today we have unimaginable access to the world's biodiversity through the internet, roads, dwellings, education, bioliterate societies, DNA barcoding, genome sequencing, and human curiosity. The wild world gains from our understanding that it needs large and diverse terrain, relief from hunting trees and animals, site-specific restoration, profit-sharing with its societies, and tolerance of humans and our extended genomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Insects of Western North America 4. Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2
    Insects of Western North America 4. Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2. Dragonflies (Odonata), Stoneflies (Plecoptera) and selected Moths (Lepidoptera) Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2. Dragonflies (Odonata), Stoneflies (Plecoptera) and selected Moths (Lepidoptera) by Boris C. Kondratieff, Paul A. Opler, Matthew C. Garhart, and Jason P. Schmidt C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 March 15, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration (top to bottom): Widow Skimmer (Libellula luctuosa) [photo ©Robert Behrstock], Stonefly (Perlesta species) [photo © David H. Funk, White- lined Sphinx (Hyles lineata) [photo © Matthew C. Garhart] ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 Copyrighted 2004 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………………….…1 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………..…………………………………………….…3 OBJECTIVE………………………………………………………………………………………….………5 Site Descriptions………………………………………….. METHODS AND MATERIALS…………………………………………………………………………….5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION………………………………………………………………………..…...11 Dragonflies………………………………………………………………………………….……..11
    [Show full text]
  • Arriving at the Whole Story President Chris Hepburn, Vice President Michael Clarke, Secretary Katherine Howard, Treasurer
    NEWSLETTER Newton’s land trust working to preserve open space since 1961 WINTER ISSUE NEWTONCONSERVATORS.ORG • WINTER 2020-2021 2020 Officers and Directors Ted Kuklinski, Arriving at the Whole Story President Chris Hepburn, Vice President Michael Clarke, Secretary Katherine Howard, Treasurer AnnaMaria Abernathy David Backer Peter Barrer Barbara Bates Dan Brody Bonnie Carter Margaret Doris ALL PHOTOS THIS ARTICLE: SAM JAFFE Henry Finch Left to right: Cecropia Giant Silk Moth, Hyalophora cecropia: found on buttonbush,Boston MA. Maurice Gilmore Elm Sphinx, Ceratomia amyntor: Mimic of dried elm leaves, found at Oxbow National Wildlife Refuge, Harvard MA. Daniel Green Abbott’s Sphinx, Sphecodina abbottii: False-eye and grape-patterns, found in Newton, MA on fox grape. William Hagar Ken Mallory George Mansfield y name is Sam Jaffe, and I founded bright warning colors, or strange inflatable Nyssa Patten The Caterpillar Lab — an tails and false eye-spots drew people in, Larry Smith Meducational outreach, art, and sparked interest and imagination. But today, Beth Wilkinson science non-profit organization that uses caterpillars represent so much more to native caterpillars and their stories to engage me. From working so closely with these Advisors and inspire the public with their own, local, insects for so long, from rearing over five Margaret Albright and ecologically important creatures. The hundred species and countless thousands of Lisle Baker Caterpillar Lab is a fluid thing, constantly individuals, and from bringing them to meet John Bliss changing as we learn from our audiences audiences every spring, summer, and fall, the Lee Breckenridge Lalor Burdick and our creatures alike. I would like to share world of caterpillars has exploded in size.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sphingidae (Lepidoptera) of the Philippines
    ©Entomologischer Verein Apollo e.V. Frankfurt am Main; download unter www.zobodat.at Nachr. entomol. Ver. Apollo, Suppl. 17: 17-132 (1998) 17 The Sphingidae (Lepidoptera) of the Philippines Willem H o g e n e s and Colin G. T r e a d a w a y Willem Hogenes, Zoologisch Museum Amsterdam, Afd. Entomologie, Plantage Middenlaan 64, NL-1018 DH Amsterdam, The Netherlands Colin G. T readaway, Entomologie II, Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, Senckenberganlage 25, D-60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany Abstract: This publication covers all Sphingidae known from the Philippines at this time in the form of an annotated checklist. (A concise checklist of the species can be found in Table 4, page 120.) Distribution maps are included as well as 18 colour plates covering all but one species. Where no specimens of a particular spe­ cies from the Philippines were available to us, illustrations are given of specimens from outside the Philippines. In total we have listed 117 species (with 5 additional subspecies where more than one subspecies of a species exists in the Philippines). Four tables are provided: 1) a breakdown of the number of species and endemic species/subspecies for each subfamily, tribe and genus of Philippine Sphingidae; 2) an evaluation of the number of species as well as endemic species/subspecies per island for the nine largest islands of the Philippines plus one small island group for comparison; 3) an evaluation of the Sphingidae endemicity for each of Vane-Wright’s (1990) faunal regions. From these tables it can be readily deduced that the highest species counts can be encountered on the islands of Palawan (73 species), Luzon (72), Mindanao, Leyte and Negros (62 each).
    [Show full text]
  • Hawk Moths of North America Is Richly Illustrated with Larval Images and Contains an Abundance of Life History Information
    08 caterpillars EUSA/pp244-273 3/9/05 6:37 PM Page 244 244 TULIP-TREE MOTH CECROPIA MOTH 245 Callosamia angulifera Hyalophora cecropia RECOGNITION Frosted green with shiny yellow, orange, and blue knobs over top and sides of body. RECOGNITION Much like preceding but paler or Dorsal knobs on T2, T3, and A1 somewhat globular and waxier in color with pale stripe running below set with black spinules. Paired knobs on A2–A7 more spiracles on A1–A10 and black dots on abdomen cylindrical, yellow; knob over A8 unpaired and rounded. lacking contrasting pale rings. Yellow abdominal Larva to 10cm. Caterpillars of larch-feeding Columbia tubercle over A8 short, less than twice as high as broad. Silkmoth (Hyalophora columbia) have yellow-white to Larva to 6cm. Sweetbay Silkmoth (Callosamia securifera) yellow-pink instead of bright yellow knobs over dorsum similar in appearance but a specialist on sweet bay. Its of abdomen and knobs along sides tend to be more white than blue (as in Cecropia) and are yellow abdominal tubercle over A8 is nearly three times as set in black bases (see page 246). long as wide and the red knobs over thorax are cylindrical (see page 246). OCCURRENCE Urban and suburban yards and lots, orchards, fencerows, woodlands, OCCURRENCE Woodlands and forests from Michigan, southern Ontario, and and forests from Canada south to Florida and central Texas. One generation with mature Massachusetts to northern Florida and Mississippi. One principal generation northward; caterpillars from late June through August over most of range. two broods in South with mature caterpillars from early June onward.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats a Symposium
    Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats A Symposium y Edited b Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station General Technical Report SRS-145 DISCLAIMER The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service. Papers published in these proceedings were submitted by authors in electronic media. Some editing was done to ensure a consistent format. Authors are responsible for content and accuracy of their individual papers and the quality of illustrative materials. Cover photos: Large photo: Craig W. Stihler; small left photo: Joseph S. Johnson; small middle photo: Craig W. Stihler; small right photo: Matthew J. Clement. December 2011 Southern Research Station 200 W.T. Weaver Blvd. Asheville, NC 28804 Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats: A Symposium Athens, Georgia March 9–10, 2010 Edited by: Susan C. Loeb U.S Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station Michael J. Lacki University of Kentucky Darren A. Miller Weyerhaeuser NR Company Sponsored by: Forest Service Bat Conservation International National Council for Air and Stream Improvement (NCASI) Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources Offield Family Foundation ContEntS Preface . v Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats: An Introduction . 1 Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller Distribution and Status of Eastern Big-eared Bats (Corynorhinus Spp .) . 13 Mylea L. Bayless, Mary Kay Clark, Richard C. Stark, Barbara S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017, Jones Road, Near Blackhawk, RAIN (Photo: Michael Dawber)
    Edited and Compiled by Rick Cavasin and Jessica E. Linton Toronto Entomologists’ Association Occasional Publication # 48-2018 European Skippers mudpuddling, July 6, 2017, Jones Road, near Blackhawk, RAIN (Photo: Michael Dawber) Dusted Skipper, April 20, 2017, Ipperwash Beach, LAMB American Snout, August 6, 2017, (Photo: Bob Yukich) Dunes Beach, PRIN (Photo: David Kaposi) ISBN: 978-0-921631-53-7 Ontario Lepidoptera 2017 Edited and Compiled by Rick Cavasin and Jessica E. Linton April 2018 Published by the Toronto Entomologists’ Association Toronto, Ontario Production by Jessica Linton TORONTO ENTOMOLOGISTS’ ASSOCIATION Board of Directors: (TEA) Antonia Guidotti: R.O.M. Representative Programs Coordinator The TEA is a non-profit educational and scientific Carolyn King: O.N. Representative organization formed to promote interest in insects, to Publicity Coordinator encourage cooperation among amateur and professional Steve LaForest: Field Trips Coordinator entomologists, to educate and inform non-entomologists about insects, entomology and related fields, to aid in the ONTARIO LEPIDOPTERA preservation of insects and their habitats and to issue Published annually by the Toronto Entomologists’ publications in support of these objectives. Association. The TEA is a registered charity (#1069095-21); all Ontario Lepidoptera 2017 donations are tax creditable. Publication date: April 2018 ISBN: 978-0-921631-53-7 Membership Information: Copyright © TEA for Authors All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be Annual dues: reproduced or used without written permission. Individual-$30 Student-free (Association finances permitting – Information on submitting records, notes and articles to beyond that, a charge of $20 will apply) Ontario Lepidoptera can be obtained by contacting: Family-$35 Jessica E.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Worth Lagoon
    TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................ 1 PURPOSE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PARK ...................................... 1 Park Significance .............................................................................. 1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN ................................................... 2 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................. 7 Management Authority and Responsibility ............................................ 7 Park Management Goals .................................................................... 8 Management Coordination ................................................................. 8 Public Participation ........................................................................... 9 Other Designations ........................................................................... 9 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. 15 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT ................................... 15 Natural Resources .......................................................................... 16 Topography ............................................................................... 20 Geology .................................................................................... 21 Soils ......................................................................................... 21 Minerals ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FM), 3-9 July, 3-10 September and 10-13 December 1990
    BULLETIN OF THE ALLYN MUSEUM 3621 Bayshore Rd. Sarasota, Florida 34234 Published By Florida Museum of Natural History University of Florida Gainesville, Florida 32611 Number 133 14 June 1991 ISSN-0097-3211 THE BUTTERFLIES OF ANEGADA, BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS, WITH DESCRIPTIONS OF A NEW CALISTO (SATYRIDAE) AND A NEW COPAEODES (HESPERIIDAE) ENDEMIC TO THE ISLAND David Spencer Smith Hope Entomological Collections, The University Museum, Parks Road, Oxford, OX! 3PW, England. Lee D. Miller Allyn Museum of Entomology of the Florida Museum of Natural History, 3621 Bay Shore Road, Sarasota, Florida 34234, U.S.A. Faustino KcKenzie Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico, Boulevard del Valle 201, Old San Juan, Puerto Rico 00901, U.S.A. This paper is dedicated to the memory of John Griffith of Jesus College, Oxford. INTRODUCTION Anegada island is the northernmost member of the Lesser Antillean arc, situated at 18" 43'N and 64" 19'W. Its nearest neighbors are Anguilla, about 80 statute miles (127 km} across the Anegada Passage to the east-southeast and Virgin Gorda, about 13 miles (21 km} due south. Whereas the Virgin Islands are generally mountainous, Anegada reaches perhaps 18 ' above mean sea level and much of the island is considerably lower (D 'Arcy, 1975}. It is about 10 miles (16 km} in length, about 15 square miles (39 km'} in area, oriented along the east-west axis and is just over 2 miles (3.5 km} across the widest point (Fig. 16}. From the south coast and into the Anegada Passage to the southeast extends the Horseshoe Reef, long a hazard to navigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects That Feed on Trees and Shrubs
    INSECTS THAT FEED ON COLORADO TREES AND SHRUBS1 Whitney Cranshaw David Leatherman Boris Kondratieff Bulletin 506A TABLE OF CONTENTS DEFOLIATORS .................................................... 8 Leaf Feeding Caterpillars .............................................. 8 Cecropia Moth ................................................ 8 Polyphemus Moth ............................................. 9 Nevada Buck Moth ............................................. 9 Pandora Moth ............................................... 10 Io Moth .................................................... 10 Fall Webworm ............................................... 11 Tiger Moth ................................................. 12 American Dagger Moth ......................................... 13 Redhumped Caterpillar ......................................... 13 Achemon Sphinx ............................................. 14 Table 1. Common sphinx moths of Colorado .......................... 14 Douglas-fir Tussock Moth ....................................... 15 1. Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University Cooperative Extension etnomologist and associate professor, entomology; David Leatherman, entomologist, Colorado State Forest Service; Boris Kondratieff, associate professor, entomology. 8/93. ©Colorado State University Cooperative Extension. 1994. For more information, contact your county Cooperative Extension office. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture,
    [Show full text]
  • Lista Taxonómica Actualizada De Los Esfíngidos De Cuba (Lepidoptera)
    Lista taxonómica actualizada de los esfíngidos de Cuba (Lepidoptera) Alfonso Iorio [email protected] La última y más reciente clasificacion taxonómica (la misma que adopté en mi libro sobre los esfíngidos de Ecuador: “Mariposas del Ecuador. Sphingidae”) es de Kitching & Cadiou (2000). Así, la familia contiene las siguentes agrupaciones: Familia: Sphingidae Latreille, [1802] Subfamilia: Smerinthinae Grote & Robinson, 1865 Tribu: Smerinthini Grote & Robinson, 1865 Sphingulini Rothschild & Jordan, 1903 Ambulycini Butler, 1876 Subfamilia: Sphinginae Latreille, [1802] Tribu: Sphingini Latreille, [1802] Acherontiini Boisduval, [1875] Subfamilia: Macroglossinae Harris, 1839 Tribu: Dilophonotini Burmeister, 1878 Subtribu: Dilophonotina Burmeister, 1878 Hemarina Tutt, 1902 Tribu : Philampelini Burmeister, 1878 Macroglossini Harris, 1839 Subtribu: Macroglossina Harris, 1839 Choerocampina Grote & Robinson, 1865 Subfamilias, tribus y subtribus que se encuentran en Cuba: Familia: Sphingidae Latreille, [1802] Subfamilia: Smerinthinae Grote & Robinson, 1865 Tribu: Ambulycini Butler, 1876 Protambulyx strigilis (L., 1771) Adhemarius gannascus cubanus (Rothschild & Jordan, 1908) Subfamilia: Sphinginae Latreille, [1802] Tribu: Sphingini Latreille, [1802] Nannoparce poeyi (Grote, 1865) Manduca afflicta (Grote, 1865) Manduca brontes cubensis (Grote, 1865) Manduca quinquemaculatus (Haworth, 1803) Manduca rustica cubana (Wood, 1915) Manduca sexta jamaicensis (Butler, 1875) Neococytius cluentius (Cramer, 1775) Cocytius antaeus (Drury, 1773) Cocytius duponchel
    [Show full text]