COUNCIL REPORT
Executive Committee Report No. ENG 102-2017
Date: July 10, 2017 File No: 5400-10
To: Mayor and Council From: Jan Loots, Manager, Projects Subject: Safety Improvements to Railway Crossings - Update
RECOMMENDATION
THAT Council approve proceeding with the 2017 Rail Crossing Improvements, up to $500,000, as approved in the 2017 Capital Budget.
REPORT CONCURRENCE
General Manager City Manager
The General Manager concurs with the The City Manager concurs with the recommendation of this report. recommendation of this report.
SUMMARY OF THE ISSUE
An application was made late last year (2016) to the Transport Canada (TC) Rail Safety Improvement Program (RSIP) to upgrade fourteen major railway crossings at an estimated cost of $1.1M. This is part of the City’s plan to meet compliancy with the Grade Crossing Regulations.
Transport Canada recently informed the City that all applications received far exceeded the available RSIP budget. The City’s application was not approved for funding and will be reassessed by TC in the 2018-2019 fiscal year. The City’s Financial Plan made provisions to complete the railway crossing improvements with or without support funding and staff recommend proceeding with the implementation as there is no guarantee of funding. This work must be completed in seven years, from November 2014, in order to be compliant and meet Transport Canada Safety Regulations.
BACKGROUND
The rail companies and road authorities are responsible for bringing all railway crossings into compliance with the Grade Crossing Regulations (GCR) and Grade Crossing Standards (GCS) within seven years from November 2014. Each of the 52 public at-grade crossings in Abbotsford was assessed and safety improvements will be made, as discussed in Council Report ENG 066-2016 (Attachment A).
Report No. ENG 102-2017 Page 2 of 3
DISCUSSION
As a result of the information received, City staff is recommending that the following railway at- grade crossing safety upgrades be proceeded with in 2017:
Description Estimated Cost Clear vegetation and trim hedges at 56th Avenue, Swanson Road, $10,800 Glenmore Street and Townshipline Road crossings Replace and modify signs at 56th Avenue, Lefeuvre Road, Burgess Avenue, $5,700 2nd Avenue, Fadden Road, Old Yale Road, Belrose Road, Hargitt Street, Gladwin Road, Valley Road and 4th Avenue crossings Rebuild crossing surface at Morey Avenue (SRY) $130,000 Rebuild crossing surface at 4th Avenue (SRY) $100,000 Rebuild crossing surface at Marshall Road (CPR) $100,000 Replace crossing material at Gladwin Road (CN & CPR) $100,000 Contingencies 10% $44,650 Total (Budget for 2017 is $500,000) $491,150
In 2017 Southern Railway of British Columbia improved the safety of the following at-grade crossing by installing automatic warning devices (flashing lights, bells and gates):
Mile Road Crossing Estimated SRY Cost 33.82 Harris Road $275,000 34.37 Glenmore Road $275,000 35.50 Gladwin Road $275,000 35.97 Townshipline Road $275,000
FINANCIAL PLAN IMPLICATION
The City’s approved Financial Plan includes $500,000 for Rail Crossing Upgrades in 2017 and $600,000 per year for years 2018 to 2021. The total cost to the City to upgrade the 35 (27 GCR requirements and 8 whistle cessations) railway crossings is estimated at $2.9M. This work must be completed in seven years, from November 2014, in order to meet Transport Canada Safety Regulations. The City will re-apply/re-assess in 2018 for potential funding. The City will re-apply to TC under the RSIP for the remaining rail crossings.
IMPACTS ON COUNCIL POLICIES, STRATEGIC PLAN AND/OR COUNCIL DIRECTION
Addressing the railway crossing upgrades supports the four cornerstones of the City’s 2015- 2018 Strategic Plan as follows:
Report No. ENG 102-2017 Page 3 of 3
Vibrant Economy – we understand the impact we have on others and invest in building relationships that facilitate alignment by maintaining movement of goods and services throughout the region.
Complete Community - supports a multidisciplinary approach to public safety and we capitalize on opportunities around transportation in and through the City. The goal of the new Grade Crossing Regulation is to save lives by improving railway crossing surfaces, sightlines, roadway and railway signs, traffic signals and warning systems.
Fiscal Discipline – we understand how important it is to take a long-term view on maintaining and upgrading our City assets. By applying for a federal grant, we are actively managing our City finances.
Organizational Alignment – we support the efficient and effective delivery of our City services by working with senior governments and the railway companies.
SUBSTANTIATION OF RECOMMENDATION
The City’s application to Transport Canada for funding ($1.1M) through the Rail Safety Improvement Program was not approved. Transport Canada will re-assess the application in its’ 2018-2019 fiscal year. As all railway crossing upgrades must be completed in 2021, staff will proceed with the 2017 upgrade program ($500,000) as provided for in the approved Financial Plan.
ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A - ENG 066-2016 - Railway Crossing Assessment
ATTACHMENT A Os '~A COUNCIL REPORT ABBOTSFORD
Report No. ENG 066-2016 EXECUTIVE COMMITIEE
Date: December 9, 2016 File No. 5400-10
To: Mayor and Council From: Jan Loots, Manager, Projects Subject: Railway Crossing Assessment
RECOMMENDATIONS
1 THAT staff be directed to prepare a funding application to the Transport Canada Rail Safety Improvement Program, for 14 major railway crossing upgrades. at an estimated cost of $1 1M as detailed in Report No ENG 066-2016·
2 THAT staff be directed to improve the 13 minor railway crossings. at an estimated cost of $16,500, from funding identified in the 2017 Capital budget;
3. THAT staff include the upgrade of eight railway crossings. in the urban area. to whistle cessation standards, at an estimated cost of $1 .SM in the 2017-2021 Financial Plan, as detailed in Report No. ENG 066-2016; and
4 THAT the Mayor and Corporate Officer be authorized to execute all documents related to this matter
SUMMARY OF THE ISSUE
The rail companies and road authorities are responsible for bringing all railway crossings into compliance with the Grade Crossing Regulations (GCR) and Grade Crossing Standards (GCS) within seven years from November 2014. Each of the 52 public at-grade railway crossings in Abootsford was assessed against the GCR/GCS general requirements This report deals wlth the results of this assessment, financial considerations and grant funding opportunities.
BACKGROUND
Railway companies, road authorities (provinces, municipalities, band and council) and private crossing owners are each responsible for managing railway crossing safety in Canada After national consultation with these stakeholders. Transport Canada introduced GCR which are result based This means they contain options for bringing a consistent level of safety to each railway crossing in Canada They wjll take full effect over a seven year period from date of regulations (November 2014) The regulations incorporate standards based on the best engineering practices known today and makes them law
In order to prepare a plan for compliance with the GCR the 52 railway crossings in Abbotsford (Attachment "A"), that are under the City's jurisdiction (private crossings excluded), were assessed by Opus International Consultants (Canada) Limited (Opus). The assessment considered existing conditions and gauged these cond1t1ons against prescriptive railway crossing and whistle cessation guidelines from Transport Canada A supplemental safety assessment was completed and a Class D estimate prepared to bring the railway crossings into compliance Seniority at each crossing was determined with proposed cost sharing Report No. ENG 066-2016 Page 2 of 3
DISCUSSION
Opus' summary report (2016 Railway Crossing Assessments) 1s included as Attachment "B"
Required Railway Crossing Improvements to Meet Regulations
The detailed list of required improvements 1s included in the Opus summary report
In summary, of the 52 public railway crossings in Abbotsford 11 crossings are fully compliant 27 crossings require improvements at cost to the City estimated at $1, 126 500, and 14 crossings require improvements by the rail companies at no cost to the City as outlined in Opus' report. Of the 27 railway crossings, 14 are eligible for the GCR grant program for $1 1M The remaining 13 are not eligible for a grant, but will be funded from the capital budget at $16 500
Desirable Railway Crossing Improvements (Whistle Cessation)
Federal rules require all trains to whistle when they approach a grade level crossing Mumc1pahties may work with rail companies to install alternate safety measures at these crossings to eliminate the need for routine train whistling. These may include the installation of either flashing lights and bells or flashing lights, bells and gates, at cost to the municipality (if requested by the municipality) It is important to note that even if a whistle cessation agreement is obtained at a particular location, rail companies will always retain the overriding authority to sound the train whistle at the sole discretion of the conductor
Of the 52 railway crossings, 19 have whistle cessation standards in place. If the City considered upgrading the remaining 33 railway crossings, it would cost $7.4M to $7 .SM Southern Railway of BC Ltd will upgrade four of these railway crossings in 2016 to meet the whistle cessation requirements. Of the remaining 29 railway crossings, eight are located within the urbanized area and the cost to upgrade them is estimated at $1 .8M. It 1s recommended to upgrade the eight locations in order to further improve safety and quality of hfe by hm1ting whistling noise 1n the urban areas. These whistle cessation upgrades are over and above what is required to meet the GCR and would not be eligible under the grant program; although, staff feels that this would support the Official Community Plan (OCP) and Council's Strategic Plan objectives as the City grows and develops.
Federal Funding
Federal grant funding (up to 80% of eligible cost) is currently available through Transport Canada's Infrastructure, Technology and Research component of its Rail Safety Program ($55M over three years). The railway crossing upgrades, listed in the Opus report to bring the crossings in Abbotsford into regulatory compliance, are eligible projects for funding. Subject to Council's approval, applications will be prepared for 14 crossings totaling $1 11 M. The hst 1s included as Attachment ·c" A funding application for each of the 14 railway crossings must be submitted to Transport Canada no later than December 23, 2016
Where the cost of upgrades, per crossing, is less than $1 ,000 or considered maintenance, it will not be included in the funding application. This will affect 13 railway crossings at an estimated cost of $16.500. Report No. ENG 066-2016 Page 3 of 3
FINANCIAL PLAN IMPLICATION
The City's approved 2017-2021 Financial Plan includes $500,000 for Rail Crossing Upgrade Program in 2017 and $600,000 per year for years 2018 to 2021 . The total cost to the City to upgrade the 35 (27 GCR requirement and 8 upgrade to whistle cessation} railway crossings is estimated at $2.9M.
Date reviewed and approved by the Chief Financial Officer: December 8, 2016
IMPACTS ON COUNCIL POLICIES, STRATEGIC PLAN ANO/OR COUNCIL DIRECTION
Addressing the railway crossing upgrades supports the four cornerstones of the City's 2015- 2018 Strategic Plan as follows:
• Vibrant Economy - we understand the impact we have on others and invest in building relationships that facilitate alignment by maintaining movement of goods and services throughout the region.
• Complete Community - supports a multidisciplinary approach to public safety and we capitalize on opportunities around transportation in and through the City. The goal of the new Grade Crossing Regulation is to save lives by improving railway crossing surfaces, sightlines, roadway and railway signs, traffic signals and warning systems.
• Fiscal Discipline - we understand how important it is to take a long-term view on maintain and upgrading our City assets. By applying for a federal grant, we are actively managing our City finances.
• Organizational Alignment - we support the efficient and effective delivery of our City services by working with senior governments and the railway companies.
SUBSTANTIATION OF RECOMMENDATION
The City is required to bring all the public railway crossings within its municipal boundary in compliance with the new Grade Crossing Regulation within the next five years. The Opus railway crossing assessment established that the City is required to upgrade 27 of the 52 railway crossings at an estimated cost of $1 , 126,500. It is recommended to first apply for a federal funding grant before proceeding as any work started prior to funding approval is not eligible. The railway crossing upgrades can be completed within the next three years.
It is also recommended that the City upgrade eight railway crossings in the urbanized area to whistle cessation standards at a cost of $1 .8M in the five-year capital plan, as this would support the OCP objectives and Council's Strategic Plan as the City grows and develops.
Jan '-~ Pete! Sparanese, P <..E_n_g_. ---- Manager, Projects General Manager, Engineering and Regional Utilities
ATIACHMENTS Attachment •A": Rail Crossing Locations Attachment "B": Opus Summary Report Attachment "CH: List for TC funding application c( co I .. ..0 CN .Ji Eco ~o :: z __J _ _l c(" "II.I !
r:r +- l" ...... -- - Attachment B ENG 066-2016
- OPUS
City ofAbbotsford 2016 Rail-way Crossing Assessntents Summary Report t)oPUS
City ofAbbotsford
2016 Railway Crossing Assess01ents SuDllllary Report
Opus lntemadonol Consultants (Canodo) Limited ;_ {fir\ YanCOU\'er Office 210-889 Harbourside Drl\'e Je$1e Arsenault, P.En&. Senior Tran.sportntlon Engineer North Vancou,-er BC V7P 351 Cann do
Telephone: +I 604 990 4800 Facsimile: +I 604 990 4805 Approved for Release by 4w Date: December 2016 Reference: H-90128.00 Terry -::1Eng. Tr.!nsport1tion Work Group Manager Status: Final \'2
c Opua lntemational Consultant.I (Canada) Limited 2016 I t'il) of Abhol Contents Introdut.-tion ...... 1 2 Assessn1ent Process ...... 1 3 l m pro, ement Su m mary ...... 1 :~.1 Cost Sharing Assu1npt1ons ...... 1 ~.2 Required 1mprOVL'l11t!nts ...... !? :~.3 Rl'quiremenls for Whistle Cessation ...... 2 3.4 Requirements Sun1111al} ...... ;~ 4 Conclusions ...... 6 Appendices Appcn 1 Introduction Opus International Consultants (Canada) Limited (Opus) was engaged by the City of Abbotsford (the City) to conduct railway crossing assessments and whistle cessation studies for at-grade rail crossings throughout Abbotsford. The City aims to compl) with Transport Canada's updated Grade Crossing Standards (CGS) and Grade Crossing Regulations (CGR). The assignment imoh·ed the assessment of 52 at-grade rail t'rossings in Abbotsford and the identification of requirements for each crossing to comply with the safety standards and anti-whistling requirements. Individual repoi1s were requested for each of the 52 at-grade rail crossings as well as a summal"} report which is presented herein. 2 Assessment Process Opus completed assessments of all 52 public at-grad1.> rail crossings in Abbotsford. based on the GCS and GCR. A supplemental) safot) assessment was also conducted at each location to idcntif) optional improvements the City could make to improve the safety of the rail crossing. Site \'isits \Wrc completed during the da} and nighttime at each rail crossing by two memberc; of the project team on Jul} 5-"' and August 2-5. 2016 \'ehicle traffic data was either prO\ided by the Cit) or collected by a sub-consultant at each location. The senior party at each rail crossing was provided b) the Cit) for most crossings \\;th the remaining coming from the railwa) companies. l ligh level costs were developed for imprO\·ements required to meet the GCS and GCR as well as for optional whistle cessation. A proposed cost sharing regime was developed for each rail crossing based on historical precedence bet\\ een the three railway companies (Southern Railway of British Columbia (SR\1, Canadian Pacific Railwa) (CPR). and Canadian National Railwav (CN)) 3 Improvement Summary The fo))o,,ing sub-sections address the proposed improvements and their estimated costs. Appendix A pro\ ides a detailed listing of the required impro\'emcnts and requirements for whistle cessation at each location. 3.1 Cost Sharing Assu1nptions The cost-sharing for the required upgrades is based on the GCR. Seniorit), and historical precedence. For SRY crossings. under normal circumstances, it is proposed that the Junior part)· \,;u pay for capital upgradl's (crossing surface and upkeep of the railway crossing sign and sign post) to meet the GCR and GCS. For CPR crossings, it is assumed that the Junior party will pay for all upgrades (capital upgrades, signs and signals) to meet the CCR and GCS. Formal agreements will be required with CPR to confirm actual cost sharing based on federal guidelines as outlined in the GCR and GCS. CitJ of Abbotsford - Raih'a) Cro~ingAs~cssm cnts -Summar') Report 2 For CN crossings, it is assumed that the Junior patty will pa~ for capital upgrades to meet the GCR and GCS and that CN ''ill pay for items related to the upkt'ep of the railwa) crossing sigo and sign post. At all locations, maintenance acti' lties, such as clearing \'egetation to increase sightlinl distances is the responsibility of the landowner (City or rail companies) on which the \'egctation is growing. Costs for optional crossing safety devices, such as bells, whistles. and gates; will be bome b) the initiating proponent, regar A listing of the common required improvements and their unit costs arc shown in tl1e table below. In instances where a concrete crossing is being provided, it is assumed full replacement is required. Item ------Unit Co~'t Notes New Sign Per Sign $300 Assume concrl'te Replace Crosi,ing Surface Per Crossing $100.000 replacement Repa\'ing Approach Per Approach $10,000 Assume concrete Widening Crossing Surface (wood) P<:r Crossing $100,000 replacement Widening Crossing Surface (asphallL ___ Per Side $5,000 - Assume c:oncrclt'--~- Widening Crossing Sttrface (concrete) Per Crossing $100,000 r~lacement \'t>gctation dearing Pt.>r Quadrant $5.ooo In total, 41 of the 52 crossings require improvements of some kind. 111e City is responsible for funding upgrades at 27 crossings for a total of S 1.126,500. The costs for each of the rail"' a~ companies amount to $ 132,500 (SRY) at 2 1 crossings, $21.350 (CPR) at 6 crossings. and $116.200 (Cl'\) at 4 crossings. :1 .3 Requiren1ents for '\Thistle Cessation Whistling is considered a nuisance issue (noise) as opposed to a safet) issue. Therefore \\histle cessation is not a requirement of the GCR/GCS The requirements for whist1e cessation depend on the railway design speed the number of tracks, and whether the crossing is used by vehicles or only by pedestrians/cydists. For crossings which allO\'< vehicle use, either Flashing Lights and Bells. or Flashing Lights, Bells and Gates are required for whistle cessation. More details of whistle cessation requirements can be found in Appendix D of the GCS. Note that whistle cessation is not a requirement of the new regulations/ standards A listing of the required improvements for whistle cessation and their unit costs are shown in the table below. Item -- Unit Cost Flashing Lights and Bells (single or double tracks) __Per CrossinL $200,000 _Flashing Lights, Bells and Gates (single track) Per Crossing $350.000 Flashing Lights, Bells and Gates (double tracks) Per Crossing $400.000 Cit~ of Abbotsford - Raih' a) Cro:.sing Assessments - Summa!") Report 3 19 of the 52 locations assessed meet the requirements for whistle cessation. The 19 locations are predominant!) located on the CPR and CN rail Imes. It would cost S"'.470,000 to $7,750,000 to upgrade the remaining 33 locations to qualif) for whistle cessation. There are 16 crossing locations within the City's Urban Development Boundal'). The table below indicates which crossings are in an urban area and the required costs to upgrade to qualif) for whistle cessation. Crossmgs without costs{$-} do not require improvements specifically for whistle cessation Crossing Location Estimated Costs for Whistle Ceb.Sation 13: Valley Road {SRY) $200,000 14: McCallum Road (SRY) $- 15: Industrial Avenue (SR\') S200.ooo 16: Enterprise Avenue (SRY) $200,000 17: Turner Street (SRY) $200.000 19: Morey A~enuc (SRY) $200,000 ----~~ 20: George Ferguson Way (SRY/CPR) S· 21: b;sendene A\'enue (SRY/ CPR) S· :.a2 : l\lan,hall Road (SRY CPR) $ 2:i : \'ye Road (SRY/ CPR) $- 24: 4 A\'enne (SRY) $120,000 - $400,000 ---- 25: 2 A\'enue (SR\) S:wo,ooo 51: \'alley Road (CPR) $200,000 52: Maclure Road (CPR) $ 53: l\lcC'\llum Road (CPR) s 54: 4 A\'enue (CPR) s- 8 The total cost to upgrade the l4 crossings \\;thin the City's Urban Development Boundal) is between Si.520,000 and $1,800,000. depending on whether gates can be installed on the existing infrastructure at location 2.4. 3.4 Requiren1enls Summary The table below pro,;des a summal) of compliance status for the GCR/ GCS requirements as well as for whistle cessation Appendix A mdicates those improvements required at each crossing and the responsible agenC) (City and/or rail). City of Abbotsford - R ailway Crossing Assessment:. - Summary Report 4 'Whistling is considered a nuisance issue (noise) as opposed to a safety issue. Therefore whistle cessation is not required to meet the GCR/ GCS. i-Legend 0 ~ully compliant ""¢ Improve-ments required (no cost to City) --- t ~ I mpro~~ents requiredC·with costs to City) -----! Cr ossing Location GCR/GCS Compliant Qualify for Whis tle Cessation 1: 56th Avenue (SRY) 2: Lefeuvrc Rd (SRY) _.•__ • 3: Rand Rd (SRY) --· 4: Bradner Rd (SRY) •cf> • 5: Ross Rd (SRY) ¢ • ------6: Mt Lehman Rd (SRY) ¢ • T Burgess Ave (SRY) • -----~ 8: Harris Rd (SRY) • • 9: Glenmore Rd (SRY) • 10: Gladwin Rd (SRY) • 11: Townshipline Rd (SRY) --• 12: Clayburn Rd (SRY, CPR) • • 13: Valley Rd (SRY) • 14: McCallum Rd (SRY) • •lt'J ~--- 15: Industrial Ave (SRY) • 16: Enterprise Ave (SRY) • • lT 1\1mer St (SRY) • 19: Morey Ave (SRY) • 20: George Ferguson Way (SRY, CPR) • • 21: Essendene Ave (SRY. CPR) City o f Abbotsford - Railwa} Cr ossing Assessm ents - Summa~ Report 5 22: Man.hall Rd (SRY, CPR) • 0 -~ - 23: Vye Rd (SRY, CPR) It] 0 ------~ - -~ 24: 4th Ave (SRY) 25: 2nd A\'e (SRY) . ----~-- 26: Angus Campbell A,·e (SRY) • 51: \'alle) Rd (CPR) 52: Maclure R Each of the 52 public at-grade rail crossings in Abbotsford were assessed against the GCR/GCS general requirements and the GCS whistle cessation requirements. A supplemental safet) asse.o;sment was completed at each location to identif) additional measures which could improve the safet) of the crossing. The Class 0 estimated costs to comply with the GCR/GCS amount to $ 1,126,500 for the Cit}. $132,600 for SR\, $21,350 for CPR and $ 116,200 for CN. Nineteen locations currently qualify for whistle cessation and it would cost an additional $7,470,000 to $7,750,000 to upgrade the remaining 33 locations to qualif) for whistle cessation. Cost estimates were not den•loped for the supplemental safety improvements. Federal f.rant opportunities arc available for required safety improvements at rail crossings. The mam grant opportunit) cunentl} available is th t.> Rail Safety Improvement Program (Infrastructure. Technolog) and Research component). The deadline for applications is December 2~. 2016. Appendix A Improvement Summary Ri••1uirl"d lmprtl\l'ml"nh \\.hi,tle ( '<·~'"' "'" Mainte nance / c·ty Co R.oilwuy Total Costs Required lmpro,·emenl'l Cost Location Required tmpro,ement 1 1 Priority" To taJ Co-.lb Capita) Activit) s Company Cost for City for Railway for Whistle Cessation E.<.timale IMl c~., ... ,,ttltlon Ma1ntrnanu $S,OOO 1 S6~ Av.nu• SS.000 ISil!l__ ~h- SS.300 SI0,300 (SAY) FIO\h1ng ltghts and• be!I $200.000 (SRY) Retr0 R,place two 11'\Correct r11~y wafning "8"~ M11ntf'n1nc.e $600 Medoum 7 BurgusA"' R•tror!fl;;.ttve s~etm1 ort ro1lwav crossln1 sran Po!' M11~en1nce 5300 (SRY) M.cl1um SS.600 S300(SAV) Fl.,h1ng hghu 1nd a bell (SRY) 5200.000 ·-----W•den lhe cros 11 . M<'~llum Rd Re~1r nutedal such that it dGes not move wh~n C.p.1a1 S40.000 Low $40,000 so N on~ so (SRYJ ~er~ ------Ke<1uired lmproH•nwnl• \\l1i•tlt• ( t•.,.,utwn Location Rectuired Improvement Mai~tenan~. I City Co~t Railw&)' Priority" Totut. Co.;;t, Totul <;:osts Re~d Jmprovements Co~t Cftp1tnl ActiVlty Company Cost for City for Ra1Jway for Whistle Cessation E.~hmate RPuororteclive sheeting on t'illlwav crossing sign poH Maln1enonc• $300 (SRY) Medium 15 lndustrt'11 l\vt- - (SRY) b!•nd !ht uoss1ng surface by0.5 m In bo!h C I S O OOO SI0,000 $300 (SRV) FlashlnS hgh!sond a btll $200,000 I dlrKllQnS ap•t• I . Low -- . ------I R•1tortnf'Ctiv• sht•MC on ra1lw•v cron.na •i&n po.1 M.,nltn•nc• $300 (SRY) Mrdoum I 16 Entttrpn\f' Av~ t ------·_ -- -- ISRY) h1tnd '"" cronu>c surface by o Sm 1n b01h S SO $10.300 ISAY) 1 Fl.>sl>on& l1gh1s and a bell $200.000 I doftc!IMS capo!O 1 10.000 (SllYJ low 17:Turntr St (SRYI fR•~ra 2;.-;-ha!c.,,;; Rd I C~ar ••&•ti.lion . M•i.nten1n<"e SI0.000 (SRY) Hi«h I - · t - ~--~~ • ------SO SI0.300 (SRYJ Flashing hghts and a btll 5200.000 (SRY) I R•~r0 Rrbuild !ht cro~slns surf~c• such 1h~t ll rraches al C $JOO 1 000 i 1.. u O.S m boyond the fO.)dway In both dlrect1nn> .irrna • Low Rettuirt•d lmprt,.enwnto. \.\'h hlle C C'>'>Ulwn Mnintennncc / C'ty Coo;t Railway Totnl CosL'i Required Improvements Cost Location Required Improvement 1 Prioritv' Total Co~ Capital Activity Company Cost • for City for Raihva) for Whistle Cessation Estimate lO Old Yale Rd - northofVyr Rd Recroreffest Mainttnanr~ $300 MMI um S300 (SRYJ_ so t1.,111ng h&htt and a brll $200.000 ~ 33 UpporSumu None so so -- - la:;;ong 1.;,::~ ;nd gaits S350,000 ~l~d~N) ~ - J4 little St (CN) Retr0 • : Priont11 wns ba.\td '"' tht> estimated degn.'C to which th1· improvemt-nt will improve !-afcty. Rei:nrdle<.' of ~t•ltro priority, all 1mprcll'emcnL' ore n.'quirl'd in order to mt>el thl! CCR and GCS / Opus Internatio nal Consultants (Canada) Limited 210-889 Harbourside Drive North Vancouver BC V7P 3S1 Canada + l 604 990 4800 +I 604 990 4805 ww'' .opusinternational.ca Attachment C ENG 066-2016 Funding Application List Rail Estimated City No Location Name Location Company Capital Costs 2 Lefeuvre Road SRV Mile 28.77; Fraser Valley subdNi.~ion Sl00,000 3 Rand Road SRV M ile 29.02; Fra~ Valley subdivision Sl00.000 7 Burgess Avenue SRV Mile 32.32; Fraser Valley subdivision SS,000 13 Valley Road SRY Mile 37.94; Fraser Valley subdivision SS,000 14 McCallum Road SRV Mlle 38.15; fr~ Valley subdivision S40,000 15 lnduruial Avenue SRY Mile 0.39; Matqui lndumial Spur Sl0,000 19 Morey Avenue SRV Mile 39.06; Fraser Valley subdivision S130,000 SRY Mile 40AO; Fraser Valley subdivision 22 Marshall Road Sl00,000 CPR Mile 7.64; Mission Subdivision 24 4 Avenue SRY Mrle 42.65; Fraser Valley subdivision Sl00,000 Old Yale Road SRY Mile 49.35; Fraser Valley subdivision 29 $100,000 (E of Vye) CN Mile 89.27; Yale subdiv1s1on 41 Gladwin Road $100,000 CPR Mrle 1.40; Page Subdivision 46 Mat:squl Trail CPR Mite 1.01; Mrssion Subd1111sion Sl00,000 47 Page Road CPR Mile 1.31; Mission Subdivision $100,000 48 fore Road CPR Mite 1.96; Mission Subd1V1sion S120,000 Total Coru Sl,110,000