Campus Master Plan Workshop 3 – April 23, 2020 Master Plan Advisory Committee Agenda

1 Master Plan Overview and Process 2 The University Today 3 Campus Assessment 4 Engagement Summary 5 Summary and Next Steps

2 Master Plan Components

CA M PUS M A S T ER PL A N

S PA C E N EE D S C A M P U S L AN DS CAP E ON- C A M P U S ASSE SSM EN T P L ANNI NG A RC H ITE C TUR E H O US IN G + D IN IN G P L ANNI NG

3 Planning Team – Ayers Saint Gross and Brailsford and Dunlavey MASTER PLAN MASTER SPACE ANALYTICS SPACE

Jessica Leonard William Story Sarah Wright Laura Wheaton Aaryne Elias AIA, LEED AP AICP, LEED AP Campus Planner AIA, LEED AP Space Needs Assessment Lead Principal-in-Charge Project Manager + Designer Campus Planner

LANDSCAPE PLANNING PLANNING LANDSCAPE HOUSING & DINNING Adam Ravestein Ryan Jensen Eric Richard Amy Ellingson Hans Graf PLA Project Director Senior Analyst Project Analyst AIA, LEED AP BD+C Landscape Architect Architect 4 designs that that designs We Integrated Services Integrated Services

Ayers Gross Saint engage MASTER PLAN people and places toplaces and people

enrich enrich the world.

create create Our FocusOur G G G F E E E D D U D U C U U U C C C C B U A U A ranklin and Marshall College College Marshall and ranklin rizona State University rizona mory University University mory lon University College lmhurst olorado State University olorado Charleston of ollege of America University atholic University Mellon arnegie State University alifornia niversity of Denverof niversity niversity of Delawareof niversity Springs C. Colorado, of niversity Cincinnati niversityof Chicago of niversity State University oise niversity of Baltimore Baltimore of niversity Arizona niversityof eorge Washingtoneorge University eorge Mason University Mason eorge uke University University ePauw enison University oucher College College oucher SG completed has master more 250 than plans

80% A Educ ll of our work is for mission H U N U U U U U N U U U U M M H T U L U K Joh Ha G U

igher igher he Ohio State University Ohio he oyola University Maryland Maryland oyola University niversity of Notre of Dame niversity niversity of North Texas North of niversity Florida North of niversity Charlotteat Carolina North of niversity Hill Chapel Carolina, North of niversity Rancho New Rio Mexico, of niversity niversity of Miami Miami of niversity niversity of Massachusetts, Amherst Amherst Massachusetts, niversityof niversity of Maryland, College Park Park College Maryland, of niversity Baltimore Maryland, of niversity MBC MBC Kentucky of niversity niversity of Georgia Georgia of niversity ansas State University ansas arvard MedicalSchool orthern Arizona University Arizona orthern orth Carolina State University Carolina orth rinnell College College rinnell arymount University arymount Art of InstituteCollege aryland rvard University,rvard Campus Allston ation ation ns Hopkins University ns Hopkins

1 I nstitutions nstitutions C

ultural ultural 0% 0%

Pr 1 Washington University in St. Louis Washington Louis St. in University WakeUniversity Forest Virginia Commonwealth University Commonwealth University Virginia Virginia of University Towson University TexasUniversity A&M Maryland of College Mary’s St. University of Southern California Southern of University Salisbury University University Salisbury Rush University Medical Center Medical Rush University Rutgers, State University of New Jersey Newof State University Rutgers, Rochesterof University University Dominion Old Rowan University Richmond of University Island Rhode of University College Macon Randolph University Purdue Pittsburgh of University University of Wisconsin Wisconsin of University State UniversityPennsylvania State University Oklahoma University of Oklahoma Oklahoma of University University Ohio ivate Sector K

- 12 and 12 0% 0%

- driven clients.

–

Madison Madison 5 MASTER PLAN Dunlavey and Brailsford Our mission is to make Purdue University University Purdue make to is mission Our investments organizations to tois purpose Our Northwest the strongest owner possible possible owner strongest the Northwest

that that

maximize the valuemaximize the of

advance inspire inspire and communities. empower

Student housing projec housing Student In completedIn projects Completed projects Years the industry in 1200+ 1200+ $35B+ 500+

States 50 27 ts 6 MASTER PLAN Dunlavey and Brailsford and between Ayers Recent Collaborations Gross Saint Purdue UniversityFortWayne Denison UniversityDenison

University Carolina,North of Universityof Pittsburgh Chapel Hill Hill Chapel

Virginia CommonwealthUniversity North CarolinaNorth StateUniversity

7 UNIVERSITY’S STRATEGICUNIVERSITY’S GOALS. THE PHYSICALWITH CAMPUS MASTER PLANALIGNSTHE THE What is a Master Plan? Plan? Master a is What

• • • comprehensive and long MAS• TER PLAN decision F towards shared objectives. universitythe of areas to work I projects broaderwithin a context. A (10 A dentifies opportunities fordentifies opportunities many lexible framework tosupport dvances near 20 year)-20 vision for campus.

-making. -term priority

-range

8 Master Plan Committees Committees Plan Master

• • MASTER PLA• N Role CommitteeAdvisory each workshop planningteam at Me concepts strategies and planning on Pr Plan process Masterduring the sounding board Se ovide feedback rve as a as rve et with the et the with

B T r o u a s r t d o e e s f

C E o x m e c m ut i t i t v e e e E C ng E C o S ng m o t S a a m t g a m k a e g m e u k m e n h u e m e ic o n h nt e l ic o a de nt l t a de a io t r a nd io

n r nd

n C A o d mmi v i s or t t e y e

A C sse C o Ho N S o m D p m e ssme u m in a e m s c i ds in i t e ng i t W t e g t G e n o e

+ r e t r

k up in g

A B y Dun r e Gr a r i s l o s S la ss f o a v r i e nt d + y

9 Schedule

2020 2021 Phase 1: Campus Assessment Phase 2: Design Scenarios Phase 3: Recommendations JANUARY- JUNE JULY - OCTOBER NOVEMBER- APRIL

Pause in schedule

WO RK SH O P 1 - 4 WORKSHOP 5- 7 WORKSHOP 8- 10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 February March* April June July September* October December February* April

Kick-Off Stakeholder Assessment Campus Baltimore Design Design Review Present Final Interviews Review Themes + Workshop Workshop Workshop Draft Plan Draft Final Plan Campus Tours Issues Plan Campus Open Existing Space Kick-off to Final Housing and Board of House Distribution Draft Space Concept Phase Space Needs Dining Campus Open Trustees and Utilization Needs Assessment Financial House Presentation Summary Tours of Analysis and Existing Precedent Campus Phasing Housing + Universities Presentation Strategy Dining Analysis and Demand

Define | Assess | Envision | Test | Synthesize

*engagement with the larger campus community 11 The University Today

A brief history and snap shot from Fall 2019

12 Context: Where is PNW?

Chicago

Lake Michigan

PNW Hammond

Gary Merrillville Michigan City

PNW Gabis PNW Westville Arboretum Valparaiso La Porte

13 Context: History Timeline

Purdue Calumet

First technical classes on Purdue University Purdue current Calumet Campus Extension Hammond graduate its first Academic autonomy Centers in Campus class of for Purdue University Purdue Calumet Hammond and (Calumet Region baccalaureate Calumet (Regional became a residential Merrillville Purdue) degree students University) campus 1946 1951 1967 1979 2005 2016 Gabis Arboretum donated to PNW Purdue 2018 Growth Period University 1970 2000 Northwest established 2020 Opening of the Bioscience 1946 1950s 1967 2002 2016 Innovation Purdue All classes Relocation of Opening of Opening of Building (Hub Extension were held at campus to a the North the Dworkin for advanced Centers in the Barker 160-acre site Central Student STEM LaPorte and memorial (current Veterinary Services and opportunities Michigan City Center Westville Emergency Activities in Northwest Campus) Center (P3) Complex Indiana)

Purdue North Central

14 University Today “Fall 2019” Master plan Employee Data Locations Spreadsheet, PNW website, PNW Fact Book, PU System Asset Inventory, Campus SF Totals – Fall 2018 PNW University PNW: Hammond PNW: Westville

8,610 * 6,910 (80%) 1,690 (20%) Total Enrollment 7,710 * 6,020 1,690 Undergraduates 1,360 988 340 Employees

9 Students can pursue undergraduate degree Colleges and Schools 60 options at both campuses. 16 degrees can be Undergraduate Degrees 23 completed entirely at the Westville Campus. Graduate Degrees

735 ** 167 268 Acres 32 25 7 Buildings 2,024,000 + 1,586,000 + 438,000 + Gross Square Feet

* includes 910 online students ** includes the 300 acre Gabis Arboretum 15 Hammond Campus: Context Takeaways Hammond Sportsplex • 167 acres • Urban campus surrounded by 169th St residential neighborhoods K e

n • Campus includes n e

housing d y A In v

• Recent expansion e d

i rd along Indianapolis a 173 St n

Blvd a p oli Dowling Park

• Majority of the s B

campus area south lv of 173rd St. is d Wetlands wetlands and undevelopable • Lease athletic I-94/80 facilities at Dowling Park and Hammond Sportsplex

16 Hammond Campus: Character Takeaways

• Most academic buildings range from 2 to 3 stories • The campus building character is consistent with the architectural style of the time (primarily late 60s and 70s) • The architecture is mostly a mix of brick and concrete • The new Bioscience building’s architectural character is a departure from the rest of the campus, introducing more glass and metal paneling • Housing is 4 stories and character is similar to traditional developer- style multifamily architecture, with a mix of siding and brick

17 Indianapolis Blvd: Character Takeaways

• Purdue has two, 1-story buildings along Indianapolis Blvd • CIDET building is under renovation, adjacent to the Counseling Center • Architecture reflects a typical commercial corridor • Recent renovations utilize PNW branding and colors

18 Westville Campus: Context Takeaways

• 268 acres • Rural campus • Context includes small residential apartment development to the south and

predominately 21 farmland surrounding 4 ay

the campus w h g i H

19 Westville Campus: Character Takeaways

• Most academic buildings are 3 stories • The campus building character is consistent in material and design • The architecture is mostly a mix of brick and concrete • The DSAC building utilizes similar materials as other buildings on campus; it introduces glass and metal paneling giving the building a more modern character

20 Gabis Arboretum: Context Takeaways

• 300 acres • Program includes: W 100 N • Display Gardens • Restored Prairie • Wetlands • Hiking Trails • Train Exhibit • Disconnected from W

both campuses 0 0 5

• Context includes N predominately low- density residential development and farmland

21 Gabis Arboretum: Character Takeaways

• One-story building at the Arboretum has a small-town railway station character • Throughout the Arboretum, there are a number of rustic-style pavilions and shelters

22 Current Projects

Bioscience Innovation Building 68,000+ gsf STEM-centered facility that will be home to the nursing and biological sciences departments.

South Parking Lot Pedestrian Path Reconfiguration of parking lots between Bioscience Building and 173rd Street to provide an enhanced pedestrian pathway and create a more welcoming experience for visitors.

CIDET 4,400+ gsf technology-driven facility on Bioscience Innovation Building and new pedestrian path Indianapolis Blvd

UNSV Makers Space 6,000 gsf maker space within the University Services Building for the School of Engineering

Riley Center Phase 2 3,500+ gsf within the remodeled Childcare Center for the new PNW Student Counseling Center (relocated from basement of Gyte)

CIDET UNSV Marker Space 23 Planned City Projects Downtown Hammond Downtown Hammond Master Plan (TOD) Building on the inclusion of a station along the West Lake expansion of South Shore Train, the city of Hammond created a master plan focused on revitalizing the downtown and establishing a transit-oriented development.

PNW Impacts The station would be approximately 4 miles from campus and is about a 10-min drive. The train, paired with a shuttle, would provide students with greater connectivity to the region, enhancing the student experience. The train stop also provides opportunities for a broader recruitment of potential students to come to PNW by opening up alternative transportation options.

PNW Hammond

View of Downtown Hammond and proposed train station 24 Campus Assessment

User Experience Physical Environment

25 User Experience

How do we access and navigate campus?

• Access • Arrival Experience • Pedestrian Circulation

26 Access

169th St • Regional access (from the north and west) to campus is primarily from Interstate 94/80, via Indianapolis Blvd or Kennedy Ave K e

n • Interstate 90 has limited access points to campus n e

d • No signage or branding at intersections of Indianapolis y

A rd th

v Blvd and 173 /169 In e

d rd

i 173 St a n a p oli s B lv d

I-94/80

Intersection of Indianapolis Blvd and 173rd St

Hammond Campus – Access & Arrival 27 169th St Campus Perimeter & Gateways Strengths • Two well-marked main entrances to campus • Signage at main intersections on 169th and 173rd Blvd lis o p a n

ia Challenges d e n v I • Numerous smaller entrances to campus makes arrival r A e

k confusing for first time visitors and campus difficult to c

Wi monitor and secure from a public safety perspective • Entries are not clearly labeled for different campus 173rd St users – main entrance vs. visitor entrance vs. service entrance

e • Campus does not have a true gateway at any entrance v A ar m ood W

PNW Signage

* Campus Entrance

Hammond Campus – Access 28 169th St Campus Perimeter & Gateways Strengths • TBD Blvd lis o

p Challenges a n

ia • Many entrances to campus - makes it difficult to d e n v I moth nitor and secure

r A 169 Street Entrance e k c Wi

173rd St e v A ar m ood W 173rd Street Entrance PNW Signage

* Campus Entrance

Hammond Campus – Access 29 Campus Perimeter & Gateways Strengths • TBD

Challenges • Many entrances to campus - makes it difficult to monitor and secure

173rd Street Entrance Opportunity to establish a gateway for all users and improve the arrival experience and campus identity

Hammond Campus – Access 30 169th St 169th St Arrival Experience Strengths • Student life buildings maintain frontage on 173rd and are generally well-connected to each other • Drop-offs along Woodmar Avenue are located along buildings “fronts” with a more formal, residential feel Blvd lis o p a n ia

d Challenges e n v I

r A • Building entries and drop-offs along Woodmar are e k e c confusing because they are not connected to primary v Wi

r A parking areas e k

c rd • Two main entrances lead into a sea of parking

173 St Wi • User experience from main parking lots to academic buildings are typically through service/loading areas e v • “Fronts” of academic buildings are outward-facing, not A

ar inward-facing when the majority of people enter m 173rd St ood W

Hammond Campus – Arrival Experience 31 173rd Street Frontage Strengths

e • Along Woodmar Avenue, drop-offs are located along Av “fronts” of buildings and have a more formal and ar e v m residential feel r A e ood rd k W

c • Student life buildings maintain frontage on 173 and

Wi are generally well-connected to each other

173rd St ChallengesEntrance to Griffin Hall from 173rd Street • Two main entrances lead into a sea of parking • User experience from main parking lots to academic buildings are typically through service/loading areas • “Fronts” of academic buildings are outward-facing, not inward-facing to the academic core • Back-of-house resources are not well marked and PNW Signage differentiated from front-of-house experience * Campus Entrance

Vehicular Circulation Pedestrian Circulation Connection between Fitness & Recreation Center and Peregrine Hall Formal Building Entry Service/Loading Area

Hammond Campus – Arrival Experience 32 th 169 St Woodmar Avenue Strengths • Along Woodmar Avenue, drop-offs are located along “fronts” of buildings and have a more formal and residential feel • Student life buildings maintain frontage on 173rd and are generally well-connected to each other e Av ar m ChallengesEntrance to Anderson and Classroom Office Bldg off Woodmar Ave ood e W v • Two main entrances lead into a sea of parking r A

e • User experience from main parking lots to academic k c buildings are typically through service/loading areas Wi • “Fronts” of academic buildings are outward-facing, not inward-facing to the academic core • Back-of-house resources are not well marked and PNW Signage differentiated from front-of-house experience * Campus Entrance

Vehicular Circulation 173rd St Pedestrian Circulation Entrance to Lawshe off Woodmar Ave Formal Building Entry Service/Loading Area

Hammond Campus – Arrival Experience 33 th 169 St Main Entrances Strengths • Along Woodmar Avenue, drop-offs are located along “fronts” of buildings and have a more formal and residential feel • Student life buildings maintain frontage on 173rd and are generally well-connected to each other e Av ar m Challenges169th Street parking lot ood e W v • Two main entrances lead into a sea of parking r A

Vehicular Circulation 173rd St Pedestrian Circulation North 173rd Street parking lot Formal Building Entry Service/Loading Area

Hammond Campus – Arrival Experience 34 Visitor Experience

Hammond Campus – Arrival Experience 35 Visitor Experience

Admissions and Welcome Administration Center

New BIB

Planned pedestrian improvements

• How will the new Biosciences Building affect the visitor experience to the Welcome Center in SUL and Admissions in Lawshe? • Are planned pedestrian improvements connecting all necessary destinations? What affect will they have on parking? • Are there additional elements needed to clarify the visitor/pedestrian experience through the main entrance on 173rd Street?

Hammond Campus – Arrival Experience 36 Visitor Experience

Admissions and Welcome Administration Center

New BIB

Planned pedestrian improvements

Hammond Campus – Arrival Experience 37 th 169 St Building Entries Strengths • Along Woodmar Avenue, drop-offs are located along “fronts” of buildings and have a more formal and residential feel • Student life buildings maintain frontage on 173rd and are generally well-connected to each other e Av ar m ChallengesEntrance to the Anderson Building from parking lots ood e W v • Two main entrances lead into a sea of parking r A

Vehicular Circulation 173rd St Pedestrian Circulation Entrance to the Gyte Building from parking lots Formal Building Entry Service/Loading Area

Hammond Campus – Arrival Experience 38 169th St Pedestrian Network Strengths • Most of campus is within a 5-minute walk from the Student Union + Library

e • The Peregrine Path connects the core academic

Av buildings through both interior and exterior circulation ar m ood W Challenges • Many poorly-marked or non-existent pedestrian paths through parking lots, creating vehicular and pedestrian e

v conflicts and unsafe conditions r A

e • East-west pedestrian axis across campus does not k c connect across Woodmar Ave Wi • Improvements could be made to the pedestrian crossing at 173rd Street • Need to consider pedestrian, bike, and vehicular connections to Dowling Park and Hammond Sportsplex

173rd St

Hammond Campus – Pedestrian Network 39 169th St Pedestrian Network Strengths • Most of campus is within a 5-minute walk from the Student Union + Library

e • The Peregrine Path connects the core academic

Av buildings through both interior and exterior circulation ar m ood W e v r A e k c Wi

Existing Sidewalk 173rd St Peregrine Path

Hammond Campus – Pedestrian Network 40 To Hammond Sportsplex 169th St Pedestrian Network e Av ar m ood W

Lack of crosswalks across Woodmar Avenue e v r A e k c Wi

To Dowling Park

Existing Sidewalk 173rd St Lack of paved and connected sidewalks in North 173rd Street parking lot Peregrine Path No Sidewalk

Hammond Campus – Pedestrian Network 41 Looking south across 173rd Street W Capitol Ave., Sacramento, CA

Hammond Campus – Pedestrian Connectivity 42 Looking north across North 173rd Street lot Rendering of planned pedestrian improvements in North 173rd Street lot

Hammond Campus – Pedestrian Connectivity 43 Access

• Regional access (from the north and west) to campus is primarily from Interstate I-90 and Highway 421 • Access to all campus entries is from Highway 421 • No signage or branding off I-90 or along Purdue Drive 21 4 ay w h g i H

Westville Campus – Access & Arrival 44 Arrival Experience Strengths • Only two entrances to campus, which creates a more secure and monitored environment North Dr • Many buildings front the parking lots • Connections from parking lots to buildings are clear and direct 1 2 Dr 4 y e a u d w

Challenges r u gh P i

• Lack of hierarchy between the two entrances H • Parking lots dominate first impression of campus • A secondary campus road parallels Highway 421 connecting all parking areas, but lacks directional South Dr signage for buildings requiring vehicles to drive through lots to figure out where they need to go

Westville Campus – Arrival Experience 45 Campus Perimeter & Gateways Strengths • Only two entrances to campus, which creates a more secure and monitored environment North Dr • Many buildings front the parking lots • Connections from parking lots to buildings are clear and direct r 1 D 2 e u 4 y d r u wa North Drive Entrance P Challenges h g i • Lack of hierarchy between the two entrances H • Parking lots dominate first impression of campus

South Dr

South Drive Entrance PNW Signage

* Campus Entrance

Westville Campus – Arrival Experience 46 Limited Wayfinding

North Dr r 1 D 2 e u 4 y d r u wa Purdue Drive P h g i H

South Dr

PNW Signage

* Campus Entrance

Vehicular Circulation South Drive and Purdue Drive Intersection Pedestrian Circulation Formal Building Entry Service/Loading Area

Westville Campus – Arrival Experience 47 Pedestrian Network Strengths • Campus is within a five-minute walk from the core buildings North Dr • There are sufficient sidewalk connections between buildings and to the parking lots 1 2 Dr Challenges 4 y e a u d w

• Service/loading to Schwarz Hall and the Technology r u gh P Building overlaps and detracts from the pedestrian i H experience from the parking lots to the Library Student + Faculty Building • The athletic and recreation fields south of South Drive are poorly connected to the DSAC north of South Drive South Dr

Westville Campus – Pedestrian Network 48 Pedestrian Network Strengths • Campus is within a five-minute walk from the core

buildings North Dr • There are sufficient sidewalk connections between buildings and to the parking lots r 1 D 2 e u 4 y d r u wa P h g i H

South Dr

Pedestrian connection to the Library Student + Faculty Building Existing Sidewalk

Westville Campus – Pedestrian Network 49 Pedestrian Network Challenges • Service/loading to Schwarz Hall and the Technology

Building overlaps and detracts from the pedestrian North Dr experience from the parking lots to the Library Student + Faculty Building • The athletic and recreation fields south of South Drive are poorly connected to the DSAC north of South Drive r 1 D 2 e u 4 y d r u wa P h g i H

Service/loading to Schwarz Hall and Technology Building Existing Sidewalk

Service/Loading No Sidewalk

Westville Campus – Pedestrian Network 50 Physical Environment

What are the physical assets that contribute to each campus?

• Open Space • Campus Land & Building Use • Space Use & Distribution

51 169th St Natural Landscapes

• Natural landscapes on campus are a mix of pocketed forest areas and buffering edge landscapes • Edge landscapes are a combination of lawn and sporadic tree clusters, with occasional decorative landscapes near

Blvd gateways/access points lis o p

a • The forested area south of the residence halls and n ia

d fitness center is also a wetland area, which is e n v I undevelopable but may have potential for recreational r A e

k programming c Wi

173rd St e v A ar m ood W Forested Area Edge Landscapes Pond

Hammond Campus – Open Space 52 169th St Natural Landscapes

• Natural landscapes on campus are a mix of pocketed forest areas and buffering edge landscapes • Edge landscapes are a combination of lawn and sporadic e

Av tree clusters, with occasional decorative landscapes near ar

m gateways/access points

ood • The forested area south of the residence halls and W fitness center is also a wetland area, which is undevelopable but may have potential for recreational programming e v r A e k c Wi

Forested Area 173rd St Edge Landscapes Pond

Hammond Campus – Open Space 53 169th St Active Landscapes

• The Student Union + Library, Gyte Science Building, and Porter Hall at the core of campus serve as a backdrop to the central active landscape e

Av • The central open space extends east to west through the ar

m middle of campus

ood • Other passive landscape areas act as a buffer between W academic buildings and streets or parking lots • Athletic fields are located southeast of Griffin Hall or at off-campus leased buildings e v r A e k c Wi

Active Landscapes Passive Landscapes Athletics & Recreation Forested Area 173rd St Edge Landscapes Pond

Hammond Campus – Open Space 54 169th St Pocket Courtyards

• Many buildings along the Peregrine Path have small pocket courtyards that can be improved to create a better pedestrian experience e Av ar m ood W e v r A e k c Wi

Pocket Courtyards Active Landscapes Passive Landscapes Athletics & Recreation Forested Area 173rd St Edge Landscapes Pond

Hammond Campus – Open Space 55 169th St Sculpture

• Campus is filled with many different forms of art and sculpture e Av ar m ood W e v r A e k c Wi

Sculpture Pocket Courtyards Active Landscapes Passive Landscapes Athletics & Recreation Forested Area 173rd St Edge Landscapes Pond

Hammond Campus – Open Space 56 169th St Opportunities

• Several passive landscapes could be improved to become active ones • Consistent outdoor furniture can support outdoor activity e Av ar m ood W e v r A e k c Wi

Sculpture Pocket Courtyards Planned pedestrian Active Landscapes improvements Passive Landscapes Athletics & Recreation Forested Area 173rd St Edge Landscapes Grinnell College Pond

Hammond Campus – Open Space 57 Natural Landscapes

• Natural landscapes on campus are a reflection of the surrounding region, primarily a mix of pocketed forest areas, large fields, and buffering edge landscapes North Dr • Most of the edge landscapes along Highway 421, North Drive, and South Drive incorporate stormwater management facilities r 1 D

2 • Edge landscapes are a combination of lawn and sporadic e u 4 y d r u wa

tree clusters, with occasional decorative landscapes near P h g i gateways/access points H • Planted open space along Highway 421 limits views into the campus • Fields offer expansive views of the campus, emphasizing South Dr its rural setting • The pond and Shakespeare’s Garden are nice amenities

but are hidden in the service area of campus, with little Forested Area visual or physical connections to the core Edge Landscapes Fields

Pond SWM System

Westville Campus – Open Space 58 Active Landscapes at the Core

• Three academic and student life/library buildings at the core of campus serve as a backdrop to central active landscape North Dr • Buildings are connected by wide sidewalks and planting areas • The central open space is terminated by a parking lot to r 1 D 2 the north e u 4 y d r u wa P h • Athletic fields and courts are located southwest of the g i Dworkin Student Services + Activities Complex, away from H the core of campus

South Dr

Active Landscapes Passive Landscapes Athletics & Recreation Forested Area Edge Landscapes Fields

Pond SWM System

Westville Campus – Open Space 59 Sculpture

• Campus is filled with many different forms of art and sculpture North Dr r 1 D 2 e u 4 y d r u wa P h g i H

South Dr Sculpture Active Landscapes Passive Landscapes Athletics & Recreation Forested Area Edge Landscapes Fields

Pond SWM System

Westville Campus – Open Space 60 To Hammond Sportsplex

169th St Land & Building Use

• Most academic buildings are clustered together along Woodmar Avenue • The White Lodging Center, Porter Hall, and the new Bioscience building break that framework

Blvd • Housing and Fitness & Recreation Center are grouped lis

o rd

p together south of 173 Street a

n 3,694 total spaces

ia • Athletic facilities are located off campus d e n v I • Parking lots create vast distances from outer roads to r A e

k the student life/library space at the center of campus c

Wi • Support services are generally grouped together in the northeast of campus 173rd St • Many university centers are scattered outside of main campus Partnership/Outreach e

Academic v

Student Life/Library A 750 total beds ar

Administrative m

Residential ood W Athletics & Recreation To Dowling Park

Support Services Parking

Hammond Campus – Land Use 61 Land & Building Use

• Academic and student life/library buildings are clustered together at core of campus North Dr • Schwarz Hall is mostly academic space but also has some administrative space • Library Student + Faculty Building is mostly student life/library space but also has some administrative and academic space • Athletics and recreation spaces are centered around

South Drive r 1 D 2 e u • DSCA is mostly athletic and recreation space but also has some student 4 y d r u

life and administrative space wa P h g i • Support Services are located along University Drive H • Maintenance / Grounds Shops Facility is mostly physical plant space but also has some academic space (class labs) 1,541 total spaces • Parking lots create a buffer between Highway 421 and the core of campus South Dr

Academic Student Life/Library Administrative Athletics & Recreation

Support Services Parking

Westville Campus – Land Use 62 Existing Distribution of Space by Category

TOTAL ASSIGNABLE SQUARE FEET ASSIGNABLE SQUARE FEET ASSESSED

9% 19% 6% 25% 2% 8%

14% 65% 10% 4% 7%

31% ASF ASF Space Assessed 822,087 Instructional 210,248 Residential 176,942 Research 34,867 Inactive/Conversion 25,569 Library + Study 55,220 Parking Structures 236,575 Offices 256,076 TOTAL 1,261,172 Recreation + Athletics 79,735 Student 63,861 Plant 46,980 Other 75,100 TOTAL 822,087 63 Existing Distribution of Space by Campus

563,414 ASF

26%

Hammond Westville INSTRUCTIONAL 148,813 61,435 5%

RESEARCH 30,644 4,223 7%

LIBRARY + STUDY 39,632 15,588

OFFICES 184,365 71,711 33% 258,673 ASF RECREATION + ATHLETICS 38,583 41,152 24% 2% STUDENT 36,808 27,053 6% PLANT 41,334 5,646 7% 28% OTHER 43,235 31,865 7% 16% TOTAL ASF 563,414 258,673 7% 10% 2% 8% 12% Hammond Westville

64 169th St Classrooms No. of ASF Classrooms Andrey A. Potter Laboratories Building 2,526 5 C. H. Lawshe Hall 1,404 1 Classroom / Office Building 14,776 19 e v Donald S. Powers Computer Education Building 1,404 1 A ar E. D. Anderson Building 5,288 7 m Gene Stratton Porter Hall 3,273 5 ood

W Gyte Annex 1,595 3 Hospitality + Tourism Management Building 4,091 5 Millard E. Gyte Science Building 24,603 35 e

v Student Union + Library 1,563 2 r A

e Hammond Campus Total 60,524 83 k c Wi

20k

10k

173rd St ASF Scale Hospitality + Tourism Management Building

Hammond Campus – Existing Distribution of Space by Category 65 169th St Instructional Labs Class Open Grand Laboratories Laboratories Total Andrey A. Potter Laboratories Building 8,837 726 9,563 Classroom / Office Building 6,946 3,828 10,774 Commercialization + Manufacturing Center 1,323 1,323 e v Donald S. Powers Computer Education Building 5,214 5,214 A ar E. D. Anderson Building 20,534 2,031 22,566 m Fitness + Recreation Center 912 912 ood

W Gene Stratton Porter Hall 1,099 4,877 5,976 Gyte Annex 955 753 1,708 Hospitality + Tourism Management Building 957 609 1,566 e

v Millard E. Gyte Science Building 20,009 5,546 25,556 r A

e Student Union + Library 728 2,405 3,133 k c Hammond Campus Total 66,191 22,099 88,291 Wi

20k

10k Fitness + Recreation Center 1k Hospitality + Tourism Management Building 173rd St ASF Scale Commercialization + Manufacturing Center

Hammond Campus – Existing Distribution of Space by Category 66 169th St Research

ASF Andrey A. Potter Laboratories Building 1,013 Classroom / Office Building 470 Commercialization + Manufacturing Center 9.007 e v Donald S. Powers Computer Education Building 3,868 A ar E. D. Anderson Building 4,189 m Gene Stratton Porter Hall 740 ood

W Millard E. Gyte Science Building 8,056 Schneider Avenue Building 3,301 Hammond Campus Total 30,644 e v r A e k c Wi

20k

10k

173rd St Commercialization + Manufacturing Center ASF Scale

Hammond Campus – Existing Distribution of Space by Category 67 Classrooms

No. of ASF Classrooms Library Student + Faculty 4,816 5 North Dr Robert F. Schwarz Hall 13,603 19 Technology Building 9.892 14 Westville Campus Total 28,311 38 1 2 Dr 4 e y u a d r w u gh P i H

20k

10k

1k South Dr

ASF Scale

Westville Campus – Existing Distribution of Space by Category 68 Instructional Labs

Class Open Grand Laboratories Laboratories Total Library Student + Faculty 991 991 North Dr Maintenance / Grounds Shop Facility 1,504 1,504 Robert F. Schwarz Hall 13,114 13,114 Technology Building 12,721 4,794 17,516 Westville Campus Total 27,339 5,785 33,124 1 2 Dr 4 e y u a d r w u gh P i H

20k

10k

1k South Dr

ASF Scale

Westville Campus – Existing Distribution of Space by Category 69 Research

ASF Library Student + Faculty 428 North Dr Robert F. Schwarz Hall 2,886 Technology Building 910 Westville Campus Total 4,224 1 2 Dr 4 e y u a d r w u gh P i H

20k

10k

1k South Dr

ASF Scale

Westville Campus – Existing Distribution of Space by Category 70 Existing Distribution of Space by College

269,184 ASF 33% of total assessed space

96,682 total ASF

22,390 66,256 total ASF 62,032 total ASF

12,972 17,866 25,941 total ASF 74,292 18,273 3,184 53,284 total ASF 44,166 5,431 22,757 12,842

College of Business College of Engineering College of College of Nursing College of Technology + Sciences Humanities, Education + Social Westville Sciences Hammond

*Does not include classrooms 71 Academic Units 169th St

• College of Business

e 22,757 total ASF v A

ar • College of Engineering + Sciences m 74,746 total ASF ood

W • College of Humanities, Education + Social Sciences 53,284 total ASF

e • College of Nursing v 12,842 total ASF r A e k c Blvd • College of Technology Wi lis 43,711 total ASF o p a n ia rd d 173 St n I

20k 10k

ASF Scale

Hammond Campus – Existing Distribution of Space by Primary Unit 72 169th St Academic Units

• College of Business 22,757 total ASF

e • College of Engineering + Sciences v

A 74,746 total ASF ar m • College of Humanities, Education + Social Sciences

ood 53,284 total ASF W • College of Nursing 12,842 total ASF e

v • College of Technology

r A 43,711 total ASF e k c Wi

Fitness + Recreation Center

Hospitality + Tourism Management Building

20k 10k Indianapolis Boulevard Counseling Center

1k 173rd St Commercialization + Manufacturing Center ASF Scale

Hammond Campus – Existing Distribution of Space by Primary Unit 73 Academic Units

• College of Business 3,184 total ASF North Dr • College of Engineering + Sciences 22,392 total ASF • College of Humanities, Education + Social Sciences 12,972 total ASF • College of Nursing

5,431 total ASF 1 2 Dr 4 e y u a

• College of Technology d r w

17,865 total ASF u gh P i H

20k

10k

1k South Dr

ASF Scale

Westville Campus – Existing Distribution of Space by Primary Unit 74 169th St Space Adequacy Assessment

BUILDING RATING Hospitality + Tourism Management Building GOOD Commercialization + Manufacturing Center GOOD Indianapolis Blvd Counseling Center GOOD C. H. Lawshe Hall GOOD

Blvd Student Union + Library AVERAGE lis o

p Donald S. Powers Computer Education Building AVERAGE a n

ia University Services Building AVERAGE d e n v I Classroom / Office Building AVERAGE r A

e Fitness + Recreation Center AVERAGE k c Schneider Avenue Building AVERAGE Wi Millard E. Gyte Science Building POOR 173rd St E. D. Anderson Building POOR Andrey A. Potter Laboratories Building POOR Gene Stratton Porter Hall POOR e v A ar

No. % of m Rating Bldgs ASF Total ood Good 4 68,000 12% Good W Average 6 289,000 51% Average Poor 4 171,000 30% Poor Not Rated 5 35,000 6% Not Rated

Hammond Campus – Space Adequacy Assessment 75 Space Adequacy Assessment

BUILDING RATING Dworkin Student Services + Activities Complex GOOD Library Student + Faculty GOOD North Dr Physical Facilities / Campus Police AVERAGE Technology Building POOR Robert F. Schwarz Hall POOR r 1 D 2 e u 4 y d r u wa P h g i H

South Dr

No. % of Rating Bldgs ASF Total Good Good 2 127,000 49% Average Average 1 1,600 1% Poor Poor 2 124,000 48% Not Rated Not Rated 1 6,000 2%

Westville Campus – Space Adequacy Assessment 76 Good Average Adequacy by Space Category – Summary for both campuses Poor Not Rated

2% 1% 7% 6% 21% 27% 18% 29% Library + Instruction 51% Research Offices Study 40%

70% 73% 22% 33%

12% 16%

38% Athletics + 45% 47% 48% Student Plant 50% Other Recreation 52%

37% 50% 5%

77 Engagement Summary

Stakeholder Interviews Hammond Open House Engagement

During February and March, Ayers Saint Gross and Brailsford & Dunlavey participated in more than 25 meetings in person and virtually including: • interviews with academic and administrative units • thematic, topic area meetings • leadership meetings

The team also toured the buildings and grounds of each campus and the Gabis Arboretum

79 What We Heard

80 Campus-wide Key Issues and Themes

• Enhance the student experience to develop • Become a premier metropolitan university engaged students that remain at PNW and • Strengthen and expand connections between

complete their courses of study the campuses and their surrounding • Strategically utilize and improve classrooms to communities support active learning while balancing space • Consider building and land use strategies that needs support strategic goals and reduce • Increase the amount of collaboration space on maintenance requirements campus • Evaluate impact of planned TOD for • Improve open space and exterior appearance transportation, increased activity, and public of campuses to promote positive first safety impressions for visitors and greater usability • Strengthen connections with alumni for the campus community community and support success of recent • Define edges and gateways to campus clarify graduates the arrival experience and first impressions

81 124 Participants 76% undergraduate Hammond Open House 50% from College of Engineering & Sciences or the College of Humanities, Education, & Social Sciences

82 Hammond Open House Summary

Where do you live? How far are you from campus? What influenced your housing decision? Housing

How do you get to campus? How do you perceive the mobility on and around campus? Mobility Are you active in rec sports or student organizations? Student Life How much time do you spend on campus each day? Where do you spend the most of your time?

Where do you study/collaboration? What is your Study Habits ideal environment? What is your experience with campus dining? Dining What quality of different space types on campus? Quality 83 Most live in their permanent residence within 10 Hammond Open House Summary miles of campus. Cost and proximity to campus influenced decisions.

Where do you live? How far are you from campus? Come to campus by car. Bike connectivity lacking What influenced your housing decision? but pedestrian safety inside of campus is good.

How do you get to campus? How do you perceive Student Union and Library Building is where the mobility on and around campus? people spend most of their unstructured time.

Are you active in rec sports or student People prefer to study/collaborate individually or in organizations? small groups in more enclosed areas.

How much time do you spend on campus each Most people thought dining was ok and eat there day? Where do you spend the most of your time? at least one per week. Lower prices, greater variety, and longer hours were requested. Where do you study/collaboration? What is your ideal environment? Academic Support Resources and Gathering / Social spaces were highest rated facilities. What is your experience with campus dining? Classrooms, Student Health and Wellness, and What quality of different space types on campus? Recreation facilities were those seen in most need of improvement.

84 Hammond Open House: One Big Change

85 Summary and Next Steps

86 Next Steps April and May

• Housing and Dining Survey • Housing Demand Analysis

Fall 2020

• Space Needs Analysis • Planning Concept and Principles • Design Concepts

87 169th St 169th St Opportunities

• Improve the arrival experience – access points and signage and wayfinding • Formalize gateways • Improve pedestrian circulation outside of Peregrine Path

Blvd • Improve building entries from parking lots lis o p a • Establish a campus ‘heart’ n ia

d • e Improve connectivity to athletic facilities and downtown n v I area r A e k e c • Improve the quality of facilities, especially instructional v Wi

r A spaces e k c rd • Increase the number of collaboration and study spaces

173 St Wi e v A ar

m 173rd St ood W

Hammond Campus – Campus Opportunities 88 Opportunities

• Improve signage and wayfinding • Formalize gateways North Dr • Resolve pedestrian and loading conflicts • Activate campus ‘heart’ • Improve connectivity to athletic and recreation facilities 1 2 Dr 4 y • Improve the quality of facilities, especially instructional e a u d w spaces r u gh P • Schwarz Hall i H • Technology Building

South Dr

Westville Campus – Campus Opportunities 89 Opportunities

• Provide facilities and resources that support academic and research activities on site – create a hub for activity near existing facilities and infrastructure • Welcome Center with classrooms and event space • Greenhouse • Offices • Maintain mounds on site • Accessible trails • Cycling trail • Asphalt parking lot • Increased environmental signage and wayfinding • Experiential visitor amenities • Gazebo • Tree top walkway • Floating dock

Gabis Arboretum– Campus Opportunities 90 Hammond Open House Details

91 Hammond Open House: Demographics

Breakdown by Level / Location • Greatest representation from undergraduate students • Over half of participants came from the College of Engineering & Sciences or the College of Humanities, Education, & Social Sciences • Open House not held at Westville due to campus closure 4% 7% 7% 27 % Breakdown by College 12% par1 ti 24c i pan t s College of College of Technology Humanities, 12% Education, & Social College of Nursing 3% 19 % 23% Sciences 23% Honors College 2% Academic Affairs 2% Student Affairs 0% Operations and Finance 2% Office of the Chancellor 1%

Other 19% Other 9% College of Engineering & Sciences College of Business 34% 12%

92 Hammond Open House: Housing

• Most participants report living in their Type of Residence permanent residence • Of the remainder, about half live on campus and half in either a rented apartment or house • Even with high rates of commuting from home, over 70% of participants live within 10 miles of campus

9% 1 0 %

22% 60%

Distance from Campus

Further than 10 On Campus miles 21% 28%

Within 10 miles 51%

93 Hammond Open House: Housing

• Those living off-campus more likely to see cost What Most Influences Housing as primary influencer; most living off-campus Satisfaction are in their primary residence • Those living on-campus often motivated by commute and proximity • Most graduate students report either cost or commute and proximity as their primary influencer 1 0 % 1 0 % 37 % 15 %

28%

94 Hammond Open House: Mobility

Access to Campus • Most participants commuting to campus by car • Of those walking, most are living on campus • Three quarters of participants see pedestrian safety on and off campus as adequate or better • Bicycle Network widely seen as needing improvement; bike parking seen somewhat more 4%2% favorably 4% • Bus service largely seen as adequate; less than a third recommend improvements 20%

Perceptions of Mobility 70%

Parking Access

Bus

Bike Parking

Bicycle Connectivity Network

Pedestrian Safety Inside Campus Pedestrian Safety & Connectivity on Campus Edge 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Good / Great OK Needs Improvement 95 Hammond Open House: Campus Experience

• Over 90% of students spend at least 4 hours on Time Spent on Campus Each Day campus each day, and over a third spend at Students Faculty / Staff least 8 <4 6-6.9 9% • Faculty / Staff most likely to spend a full day on 4-4.9 8+ 14% 12% 36% 7-7.75 campus 7% • The SUL is the most popular space for 5-5.9 unstructured time, followed by distributed 18% 8+ 79% study / work spaces and recreation spaces 7-7.75 6-6.9 10% 15% • Few participants spend significant unstructured time in dining areas or their college building Locations for Unstructured Time

LSibturdaryen tSt Uundionen tL iFacbraurylt y BBuuildildining 15% Dining / Café Areas

35% In Your College's Building

17% Distributed Study / Work Spaces Outdoor Seating Areas

1% 7% Recreation Spaces 18% 7% Personal / Assigned Space

96 Hammond Open House: Student Life

• Over a third participate in intramural or club Participation in Intramural or Club Sports sports • Nearly two thirds participate in student organizations Yes 39% No 61%

Participation in Student Organizations

No 38%

Yes 62%

97 Hammond Open House: Study Space

• Participants generally preferred more enclosed spaces over more open ones, but in-between Sense of Enclosure spaces were most popular • Participants are mostly studying alone or in small groups • Over two thirds prefer a quiet space to study or one where they control the noise level

open semi - open semi - enclosed enclosed

Study / Collaboration Location Study Group Size

Active On-campus Indoor Public Space 20% 23% Quiet On-campus Indoor Public 3% Space Off-campus Public Space

16% Indoor Enclosed Study Room

33% Outdoor Space 5% At Home / Residence Hall individual small group medium group large group 2 - 3 4 - 6 7+ 98 Hammond Open House: Dining

• Over half of participants eat on campus at least On-campus Dining Experience How Often Do You Eat On-campus? Good / Great Daily Never or 10% 2% 3-4x / week once a week, but less than a quarter eat there Rarely 13% Needs 23% frequently Improvement 39% • About half rate the dining experience as “okay,” most of the remaining participants desire 1-2x / month improvements 21% 1-2x / week Okay 41% • Cost again a consideration, with lower prices 51% most frequently mentioned as a suggestion • Greater variety and expanded service hours also requested

99 Hammond Open House: Campus Spaces

• Academic Support Resources and Campus Spaces Gathering / Social spaces were highest rated facilities Departmental Spaces

Student Health / Wellness • Classrooms, Student Health and Wellness, and Recreation facilities were those seen in Recreation Spaces

most need of improvement Campus Environment (Exterior)

Research Laboratories

Gathering / Social Spaces

Academic Support Resources

Collaboration / Study Spaces

Teaching Laboratories

Classrooms

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Good / Great Okay Needs Improvement

100 Hammond Open House: One Big Change

101