DOCSLIB.ORG

This Commemorative Book Honours the Founding Alumni

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

This commemorative book honours the Founding Alumni, Founding Friends, Founding Law Firms, Founding Donors, Principal Donors, Patrons and Steering Committee connected to the original Bora Laskin Law Library, opened in 1991. BORA LASKIN LAW LIBRARY CAMPAIGN Co-Chairs: Lionel H. Schipper QC and James M. Tory QC Deputy Chair: David W. Smith The University of Toronto and the Faculty of Law gratefully acknowledge the leadership of the following: PRINCIPAL DONORS PATRONS STEERING COMMITTEE Canada Law Book Inc. Rosalie S. Abella 1970 John T. Burnett QC 1956 (In Memory of Alan Marks) Hon. John B. Aird OC, QC Arnold L. Cader 1965 The Henry White Kinnear Foundation Hon. John C. Crosbie PC, QC Terence Dalgleish 1975 The Kresge Foundation Hon. Edward M. Cullinton CC, QC Hon. Kathryn N. Feldman 1973 The Law Foundation of Ontario Hon. William G. Davis PC, CC, QC Edwin A. Goodman OC, QC 1940 Students at the Faculty, 1986-1991 Rt. Hon. Brian Dickson PC Stephen T. Goudge QC 1968 John H. Switzer QC 1958 Hon. Charles L. Dubin 1941 Derek C. Hayes 1961 Hon. Willard Z. Estey Hon. Donald S. Macdonald P.C. J. Trevor Eyton OC, QC 1960 William J.H. Ostrander 1980 Lawrence Freiman OC Donald G. Pierce QC 1966 Hon. Constance R. Glube Richard B. Potter QC 1965 Hon. Jerry S. Graftstein QC 1958 Dean J. Robert S. Prichard 1975 William G.C. Howland C.St.J. 1930 Lionel H. Schipper QC 1956 Hon. Frank Iacobucci David W. Smith OC 1966 Henry N.R Jackman 1956 James M. Tory QC 1952 Hon. G. Arthur Martin 1935 Asst. Dean Mary-Ellen Yeomans Paul E. Martin 1964 Hon. R. Roy McMurty QC Hon. Nathan T. Nemetz Hon. David R. Peterson 1967 Rabbi W. Gunther Plaut OC Hon. Bob Rae 1977 Louis Raminsky CC, CBE John J. Robinette CC, QC 1926 Hon. Ian G. Scott Hon. Bertha Wilson FOUNDING ALUMNI 1926 Harvie QC, Peter M. Sopinka, Justice John Robinette CC, QC, John J. Sutherland QC, H. Switzer QC, John H. Torrance QC, James G. 1927 Tory QC, James M. 1959 Matthews CBE, QC, Beverley Brownlie QC, John D. 1953 Fisher QC, Stanley G. 1936 DesLauriers QC, William J. Fraser QC, R.J. Biggs QC, Stanley C. Gambin QC, Emilio J. Garrow QC, James W. Howland, Chief Justice W.G.C. Stevenson QC, John D. Kelsey QC, Brian A. Morden, Associate Chief 1940 1954 Justice John W. Goodman OC, QC, Edwin A. Dunlop, Prof. J. Bruce Mraz, Mills Goffart QC, Lionel J. 1941 Pounsett, D.F. Schipper QC, Norman H. Dubin, Chief Justice Charles L. Risk, Prof. Richard C.B. Sutherland, Justice R.A.F. Yaremko QC, John Tinker QC, John B. 1960 1943 Bowen QC, Walter M. 1955 Morawetz QC, Carl H. Bowman QC, Donald G.H. Andison QC, Douglas World QC, Sanford Donecan QC, Edward L. Solway QC, Herbert H. Eyton, OC, QC J. Trevor 1944 Francis QC, John H. 1956 Bassel QC, John P. Grover QC, Warren M.H. Alexander, Prof. Edmund R. Hylton QC, John D. Binnington QC, Arthur A. 1947 Jones, Peter F.M. Burnett QC, John T. Gross QC, Morris A. Karp QC, Kenneth N. Mogan QC, Murray A. Kennedy, Ross L. 1948 Schipper QC, Lionel H. Lipson QC, Barry D. Somerville QC, William L.N. Shirriff QC, R.L. Lyons, Donald M. 1949 1957 O’Rorke, Desmond M. Dinsdale QC, Stanley F. Corcoran, William J. Ross QC, Gerald Eades, L. Murray Silver QC, Sheldon 1950 Eagleson OC, QC, R. Alan Singer, Irwin Cheeseman QC, Basil R. Ground QC, John D. Strauss, Louis A. Dubin QC, Anne R. Murray QC, W. Ross 1961 Stitt QC, Hubert J. 1951 Baillie QC, James C. Bohme QC, J. David S. 1958 Cameron QC, Donald R. Stevenson, Alastair Cermak QC, Josef R.C. Coleman QC, J. Gordon Friedland OC, QC, Prof. Martin L. Elder QC, J.S. 1952 Graftstein QC, Hon. Jerry S. Hausman, James S. Brown QC, William E. Kellock QC, Burton H. Davies QC, Arthur L. Margles, Harold FOUNDING ALUMNI Julian QC, In Memory of George E. Potter, QC, Richard B. Lenczner QC, Alan J. Selzer QC, Gerhard K.P. Sack QC, Jeffrey Macdonald, Ronald G. Sigel QC, Schuyler M. Somerville QC, Marc J. Mills QC, J. Paul Westlake, Brian C. Neville, Richard R. 1962 Newbould QC, Francis J.C. Duncan QC, Leslie R. 1966 Norris, N.T. Johnston, Jeremy Banfill QC, John M. Pitfield, Ian H. McNair, J.H.M. Best, Nicholas A. Ross, David J. Rosenfeld QC, William P. Cornwall QC, William J. Schwartz QC, Charles J. Steadman, Donald J. Currie QC, I.C.B. Soomer QC, Kalle Stevens QC, George C. Dickie QC, Hans J.B.A. Unwin, Timothy N. Wakefield, Donald E. Emerson QC, H. Garfield Waisberg QC, Lorie Gordon, David H. Whiteside, J.H. 1963 Hawkins, Thomas R. Wortsman QC, Harvey Bradley, J.M. Hughes, R.T. Fuke, J.M. James, Arthur B. 1968 Petch QC, John F. Kee, David J. Arthurs, Donald R. Lederman QC, Sidney N. Bain QC, Richard A. 1964 MacDonald QC, Donald L. Bjarnason, Thomas H. Affleck QC, D.S. MacOdrum, Donald H. Blair QC, Robert A. Donaldson QC, Robert A. McCordic, W. David Corbett, Justice Marie Evans, John T. McDermott, Robert K. Farrell, Jerry H. Graham QC, Prof. William C. Onyschuk QC, Bohdan S. Goudge QC, Stephen T. Lemieux, Francois Pierce QC, Donald G. Gough, Michael J. McCartney QC, James C. Robinson, Sidney P.H. Hess QC, L. Milton Reid, Anthony F.M. Rose QC, Joel M. Johnson, Jon R. Robinson QC, J.M. Smith QC, David W. Lax QC, C. Clifford Roland QC, John M. Spence QC, James M. Leblovic, Nicholas J. Seyffert QC, Warren S.R. Watchorn, Derek J. Levine, Michael A. Thorley QC, Michael G. Wolfe, Harold J. Little, Harold N. Tory, Edward A. Woloshyn, William Macdonald QC, John A.B. Maddaugh, Peter D. 1965 1967 McBride, Terry W. Armstrong QC, Robert P. Cooper, C.F. Alexander McComb, Robert J. Arnold, Stephen V. Davison QC, J. Murray Risk, Stephen T.P. Cader, Arnold L. Dube, James P. Rogers QC, Donald H. Gnat QC, Albert Fuller, D.G. Roszell, H. Lenore Gross QC, Morton G. Gibson, Donald G. Schwartz QC, A.M. Hutzel, Benjamin J. Grant, Peter S. Smolkin, Robert E. Kowal QC, Edward J. Groulx, Rodolph W. Solursh, John M. Moore, Paul M. Hunter QC, R. Douglas S. Steinmetz QC, Peter E. Pink QC, J .Garnet Jones, Richard B. Young, T.H. FOUNDING ALUMNI 1969 1971 Moore, J. Patrick Beare, Larry T. Clarke, Stephen R. Ouchterlony, Thomas W. Cooper, Daniel G. Dunbar, Sylvia l. Quinn, Peter D. Cunningham, Gordon R. Freeman, R.B. Rogala, Albin R. Finlayson, Robert D. Gilchrist, Peter W. Roland, Ian J. Herman, Lawrence L. Gord, Leslie T. Salisbury, Donald E. Laskin, John I. Harrison, Ian C. Scott, Charles F. Merringer, Edmund F. L’Heureux QC, Willard Thompson, Barbara J. Minsky QC, Alan Moldaver, Justice Michael J. VanderBurgh, William G. Nathanson QC, David C. Ortved, W. Niels Park, Gordon A. Pennal, J.D 1973 Passi, W.R. Petennan, Terry W. Blain, S.B. Salsberg, Eric P. Rook QC, John F. Butler, David G. Wasserman, Martin R Royce, Michael F. Carr, Brian R. Scott, D.R. Drabinsky, Garth H. 1970 Shaw, Richard A. Drake, W. Bruce Beach, Allan G. Stach, Erwin W. Feldman, Justice Kathryn N. Douglas, Ian Takach, Gabor Grant, Stephen M. Doyle, J. Anthony Traviss, Stephen E. Hiseler, G.R. Ferguson, Dan S. Valo QC, Sidney Keith, Brian C. Ginou, P.P. Williston, Terrence R. Levin, J. A. Glover Jr., G.C. Levitt, Brian M. Gray, Michael R. 1972 Minor, Janet E. Harris, Neil H. Adams, G. Chalmers Morris, Robert J. Layton, John F. Alboini, Victor P. Morrison, V. Ross Leibel, Allan Angelson, D.R. Naiberg, Barry MacArthur, Glen G. Beamish, James T. O’Reilly, William M. Marrocco QC, Frank N. Bruser, Robert S. Penman, M.J. McNaughton, Elizabeth L. Campion, J.A Richardson, Stephen R. McPherson, James G. Cancellara, Kenneth C. Rose, Leslie H. Pashby, William T. Cosman, R.W. Sholtace, Gerald W. Quinlan, R.P. Desipio, John D. Short, Donald E. Richardson, Elinore J. Finnerty, Patrick C. Werry, Heather A. Seyffert, Rodney W.J. Gans, Arthur M. Yates, C. Kemm Sharpe, Dean Robert J. Jewett, Peter F.S Slaght QC, Ronald G. Kent, Peter J. 1974 Stein, Stanley B. Leslie, Glenn F. Allen, Michael S. Vernon, C. Robert Loveland, Norman C. Anderson, Christine (Riddolls) Wilson, James Douglas McAuley, S. Janice Bauer, Robert T. Wood, Dennis McGregor, Barbara J. Burden, William J. Mesbur, Ruth E. Clark, Richard E. FOUNDING ALUMNI Cranston, Robert Rutherford Mcgee, Barry G. 1977 Deeth, Douglas N. Mitchell, C. Michael Bales, Karon C. Gregory, John D. Morrison, F. Paul Carter, Craig R. Hager, David Murphy, John David Croll, B.L. Harvey, Jane Prichard, Dean J. Robert S. Dillon, Ann D. Keefe, John A. Radomski, Harry B. Easto, James A. Leon, Barry A. Rueter, Robert R. Frawley, Mark P. Matz, Thomas J. Sellers, Sirje Gray, Brian W. McKeown, John S. Siller, Philip Gula, William N. Phillips, John H. Tamaki, Paul K. Hallman, Eugene S. Rocchi, Thomas J.J. Vukelich, George Hartman, Ruth E. Rogers, Derek L. Whyte, John M. Harvey, William R.C. Strathy, George R. Wilson, Ann E. Houser, Roslyn Teolis, John W. Yaksich, Mickey M. Hoy, Garry Wahl, Dorothy F. Zessner, Michael Jackson, Patricia D. Wahl, Stephen Zinn, John A. Johnson, Elizabeth J. Williams, P.J. Kushnir, Lorri 1976 Lace, Cathy 1975 Bevans, Philip G. Leon, Jeffrey S. Alexander, Deborah M. Christie, James R. Levitt, Howard A. Banack, Larry Colangelo, Joseph J. Mackiw, C.I. Barker, Bruce C. Devine, Patrick J.
Recommended publications
  • Special Series on the Federal Dimensions of Reforming the Supreme Court of Canada

    Special Series on the Federal Dimensions of Reforming the Supreme Court of Canada

    SPECIAL SERIES ON THE FEDERAL DIMENSIONS OF REFORMING THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA The Supreme Court of Canada: A Chronology of Change Jonathan Aiello Institute of Intergovernmental Relations School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University SC Working Paper 2011 21 May 1869 Intent on there being a final court of appeal in Canada following the Bill for creation of a Supreme country’s inception in 1867, John A. Macdonald, along with Court is withdrawn statesmen Télesphore Fournier, Alexander Mackenzie and Edward Blake propose a bill to establish the Supreme Court of Canada. However, the bill is withdrawn due to staunch support for the existing system under which disappointed litigants could appeal the decisions of Canadian courts to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) sitting in London. 18 March 1870 A second attempt at establishing a final court of appeal is again Second bill for creation of a thwarted by traditionalists and Conservative members of Parliament Supreme Court is withdrawn from Quebec, although this time the bill passed first reading in the House. 8 April 1875 The third attempt is successful, thanks largely to the efforts of the Third bill for creation of a same leaders - John A. Macdonald, Télesphore Fournier, Alexander Supreme Court passes Mackenzie and Edward Blake. Governor General Sir O’Grady Haly gives the Supreme Court Act royal assent on September 17th. 30 September 1875 The Honourable William Johnstone Ritchie, Samuel Henry Strong, The first five puisne justices Jean-Thomas Taschereau, Télesphore Fournier, and William are appointed to the Court Alexander Henry are appointed puisne judges to the Supreme Court of Canada.
  • Diversifying the Bar: Lawyers Make History Biographies of Early And

    Diversifying the Bar: Lawyers Make History Biographies of Early And

    ■ Diversifying the bar: lawyers make history Biographies of Early and Exceptional Ontario Lawyers of Diverse Communities Arranged By Year Called to the Bar, Part 1: 1797 to 1940 Click here to download Biographies of Early and Exceptional Ontario Lawyers of Diverse Communities Arranged By Year Called to the Bar, Part 2: 1941 to the Present For each lawyer, this document offers some or all of the following information: name gender year and place of birth, and year of death where applicable year called to the bar in Ontario (and/or, until 1889, the year admitted to the courts as a solicitor; from 1889, all lawyers admitted to practice were admitted as both barristers and solicitors, and all were called to the bar) whether appointed K.C. or Q.C. name of diverse community or heritage biographical notes name of nominating person or organization if relevant sources used in preparing the biography (note: living lawyers provided or edited and approved their own biographies including the names of their community or heritage) suggestions for further reading, and photo where available. The biographies are ordered chronologically, by year called to the bar, then alphabetically by last name. To reach a particular period, click on the following links: 1797–1900, 1901-1910, 1911-1920, 1921-1930, 1931-1940. For more information on the project, including the set of all biographies arranged by diverse community rather than by year of call, please click here for the Diversifying the Bar: Lawyers Make History home page. Last published May 2012 by The Law Society of Upper Canada.
  • STEPHANIE J. SILVERMAN Bora Laskin National Fellow in Human

    STEPHANIE J. SILVERMAN Bora Laskin National Fellow in Human

    STEPHANIE J. SILVERMAN Bora Laskin National Fellow in Human Rights Research SSHRC Postdoctoral Research Fellow, University of Ottawa Adjunct Professor of Ethics, Society, and Law, Trinity College, Toronto [email protected] +1(647)778-8787 Citizenship: Canadian _____________________________________________________________________________ Education D. Phil in Political Theory Department of Politics and International Relations, St Antony’s College, University of Oxford 2007 – 2013 Full fees and maintenance grant from the Commonwealth Association Doctoral Thesis Title: The Normative Ethics of Immigration Detention in Liberal States Supervisors: Bridget Anderson and Matthew J. Gibney Examiners: Joseph H. Carens and Cathryn Costello Abstract: This thesis critiques the ethical and political propriety of practicing detention in the United Kingdom. Using a combination of normative theory, migration studies, and public policy studies, the thesis argues that a potential solution for combating the practical problems associated with growing, worsening detention systems as well as the moral dilemma of incarcerating non-citizens based on fear of absconding would be to open borders and eliminate immigration control. Given the reality of the sovereign right to control immigration, however, the thesis concedes that the more feasible normative answer is liberal states’ adoption of a new framework of minimum standards of treatment while simultaneously pressing for open borders as the long-term ethical goal. Master of Arts in Political Science (High
  • Cemetery Inscriptions, Stark County, Ohio Are

    Cemetery Inscriptions, Stark County, Ohio Are

    !!l«^Siii«lii^lM«iil^if^ 0003055 ™ECHURCHoF JESUSCHRIST Permission to Microfilm ofL-MTER-DAY '^^'^ Famny History L.brary of Christ of C 'MN rrc Of The Church Jesus j/\llM I J Latter-aay Saints would iike permission lo preserve your material on microfilm anc make it avaiiabe to our Family History Centers If you agree, piease complete this cara and return it io us. authorize the Family History Library 'o micoiiim "he matenai named below and use this mic'ofilmed record as it seems most benefic a: n compi.ance with the Library s policies and proceoures I warrant that I am fuiiv authcze^ '3 O'cv ae :^ch permission ": e -I ma;e"a. ^^^^^W. 7" U)^ ro// STA/e,\ e^^vr/ c/V/?//-// OGS ll£& U/cr>7)i!t£.<rr yvf. 1- tv state ziD coae Si . ,J, PFGS293I 'p-aB =-'-3c-- -i^/ • CEMETERY INSCRIPTIONS Stark County, Ohio Volume VI CEMETERY INSCRIPTIONS STARK COUNTY. OHIO VOLUME VI INCLUDED IN VOLUME VI IS THE TOWNSHIP OF PERRY DATE MiCROFiCHED MAY I 8 1990 19l PrlOJCGT and G. S. FiGHS I* CALL # PREPARED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE STARK COUNTY CHAPTER THE OHIO GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY (^ OCTOBER 1. 1985 CHURCH , OF LATTER-DAY SA'.lM TS 11 FORWARD The contents of each volume of Cemetery Inscriptions, Stark County, Ohio are: Volume I: Townships of Lexington, Washington, Paris and Marlboro. Volume II: Townships of Nimishillen, Osnaburg, Sandy, Pike, Bethlehem and Sugar Creek. Volume III; Townships of Tuscarawas, Lawrence and Jackson. Volume IV: Lake Township and the cemeteries of Dead Man's Point and Forest Hill in Plain Township.
  • A Tempest in a Transatlantic Teapot: a Legal Historian's Critical Analysis

    A Tempest in a Transatlantic Teapot: a Legal Historian's Critical Analysis

    Osgoode Hall Law School of York University Osgoode Digital Commons Research Papers, Working Papers, Conference Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper Series Papers 2014 A Tempest in a Transatlantic Teapot: A Legal Historian's Critical Analysis of Frédéric Bastien's La Bataille De Londres Philip Girard Osgoode Hall Law School of York University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/olsrps Recommended Citation Girard, Philip, "A Tempest in a Transatlantic Teapot: A Legal Historian's Critical Analysis of Frédéric Bastien's La Bataille De Londres" (2014). Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper Series. 71. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/olsrps/71 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Research Papers, Working Papers, Conference Papers at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper Series by an authorized administrator of Osgoode Digital Commons. ! ! ! OSGOODE!HALL)LAW)SCHOOL! ) LEGAL)STUDIES)RESEARCH)PAPER)SERIES) Research(Paper(No.(8/2014( Vol.(10,(No.(4((2014)( ( A(Tempest(in(a(Transatlantic(Teapot:(A(Legal( Historian’s(Critical(Analysis(of(Frédéric(Bastien’s(La( Bataille(de(Londres( Forthcoming)in)Osgoode)Hall)Law)Journal,)Vol.)51,)No.)2)(2014)) ( Philip)Girard) ( ( Editors:) Peer)Zumbansen)(Osgoode)Hall)Law)School,)Toronto;)Canada)Research)Chair)in)Transnational)Economic) Governance)and)Legal)Theory)–)Editor)in)Chief)) Stephen)Ji)(Osgoode)Hall)Law)School,)Toronto)–)Production)Editor)) ! ! !
  • Ian Bushnell*

    Ian Bushnell*

    JUstice ivan rand and the roLe of a JUdge in the nation’s highest coUrt Ian Bushnell* INTRODUCTION What is the proper role for the judiciary in the governance of a country? This must be the most fundamental question when the work of judges is examined. It is a constitutional question. Naturally, the judicial role or, more specifically, the method of judicial decision-making, critically affects how lawyers function before the courts, i.e., what should be the content of the legal argument? What facts are needed? At an even more basic level, it affects the education that lawyers should experience. The present focus of attention is Ivan Cleveland Rand, a justice of the Supreme Court of Canada from 1943 until 1959 and widely reputed to be one of the greatest judges on that Court. His reputation is generally based on his method of decision-making, a method said to have been missing in the work of other judges of his time. The Rand legal method, based on his view of the judicial function, placed him in illustrious company. His work exemplified the traditional common law approach as seen in the works of classic writers and judges such as Sir Edward Coke, Sir Matthew Hale, Sir William Blackstone, and Lord Mansfield. And he was in company with modern jurists whose names command respect, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., and Benjamin Cardozo, as well as a law professor of Rand at Harvard, Roscoe Pound. In his judicial decisions, addresses and other writings, he kept no secrets about his approach and his view of the judicial role.
  • Ideology and Judging in the Supreme Court of Canada

    Ideology and Judging in the Supreme Court of Canada

    Osgoode Hall Law Journal Volume 26 Issue 4 Volume 26, Number 4 (Winter 1988) Article 4 10-1-1988 Ideology and Judging in the Supreme Court of Canada Robert Martin Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj Part of the Courts Commons Article This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Citation Information Martin, Robert. "Ideology and Judging in the Supreme Court of Canada." Osgoode Hall Law Journal 26.4 (1988) : 797-832. https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol26/iss4/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Osgoode Hall Law Journal by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. Ideology and Judging in the Supreme Court of Canada Abstract The purpose of this article is to advance some hypotheses about the way the Supreme Court of Canada operates as a state institution. The analysis is based on the period since 1948. The first hypothesis is that the judges of the Supreme Court of Canada belong to the dominant class in Canadian society. The second hypothesis is that they contribute to the dominance of their class primarily on the ideological plane. Keywords Canada. Supreme Court--Officials and employees--History; Judges; Canada Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This article is available in Osgoode Hall Law Journal: https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol26/iss4/4 IDEOLOGY AND JUDGING IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA* By ROBERT MARTIN" The purpose of this article is to advance some hypotheses about the way the Supreme Court of Canada operates as a state institution.
  • George A. Gale Fonds PF208

    George A. Gale Fonds PF208

    FINDING AID FOR George A. Gale fonds PF208 User-Friendly Archival Software Tools provided by v1.1 Summary The "George A. Gale fonds" Fonds contains: 0 Subgroups or Sous-fonds 5 Series 0 Sub-series 0 Sub-sub-series 39 Files 0 File parts 103 Items 0 Components Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................Biographical/Sketch/Administrative History .........................................................................................................................7 .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................Scope and Content .........................................................................................................................7 .........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
  • Jacques Vergès, the Devil's Advocate

    Jacques Vergès, the Devil's Advocate

    Jacques Vergès, Devil’s Advocate A Psychohistory of Vergès’ Judicial Strategy Faculty of Law, McGill University, Montreal April 2012 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Civil Law © Jonathan Widell, 2012 Abstract This study undertakes a psychohistory of French criminal defence lawyer Jacques Vergès’ judicial strategy. .His initial articulation of his judicial strategy in his book De la stratégie judiciaire in 1968 continues to inform his legal career, in which he has defended a number of controversial clients, most notably that of Gestapo officer Klaus Barbie in the 1987 trial. Vergès distinguished two types of judicial strategy in his 1968 book: rupture and connivence. Both strategies should be understood out of Vergès’ Marxist influences. This study looks into the coherence of his career in light of his initial articulation of judicial strategy and explores the shift in emphasis of his strategy from the defence of a cause to that of a person. The study adopts a three-level approach. It considers, first, Vergès’ discourse of his strategy, second, the world politics that shaped his discourse, and third, Vergès’ biography. First, Vergès’ strategy grew out of the duality of rupture and connivence and transformed into what we call devil’s advocacy, in which Vergès pits an accused (as an individual) against the justice system. Devil’s advocacy culminated in his defence of Barbie. After his defence of Barbie, Vergès pitted himself against the justice system so that his own notoriety was reflected to his clients rather than the other way around.
  • Brian Dickson: a Judge's Journey by Robert J, Sharpe and Kent Roach Toronto: Osgoode Societyfor Canadian Legal History, 2003, Pp

    Brian Dickson: a Judge's Journey by Robert J, Sharpe and Kent Roach Toronto: Osgoode Societyfor Canadian Legal History, 2003, Pp

    362 OTTAWA LAW REVIEW REVUE DE DROIT D'OTTAWA 36:2 Brian Dickson: A Judge's Journey by Robert J, Sharpe and Kent Roach Toronto: Osgoode Societyfor Canadian Legal History, 2003, Pp. 576. THIS ATTRACTIVE BOOK IS PUBLISHED by the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History which has contributed so much to the preservation of our legal heritage. Written by two distinguished scholars, Robert J. Sharpe, now a member of the Ontario Court of Appeal, and Kent Roach, Professor of Law at the University of Toronto, it provides a unique insight into decision- making in the Supreme Court of Canada. Brian Dickson was appointed to the Supreme Court in 1973 directly from the Manitoba Court of Appeal. In 1984, on the death of Bora Laskin, he was appointed Chief Justice and served until he retired in 1990. He spent some 27 years, the greater part of his professional life, as a judge. As a young lawyer practicing before the Court, I met the Chief Justice on many occa- sions and after his retirement I worked with him on implementation of the Canadian Bar Association's report on the civil justice system. 2005 CanLIIDocs 33 While Dickson was a strong and principled leader of the Court, and introduced a number of administrative reforms, it is his Supreme Court opinions, renowned for their clarity and simplicity of expression, including those important decisions which lay down the rules for the interpretation of our individual rights and freedoms, which are his lasting legacy. Robert Sharpe worked as Executive Legal Officer at the Supreme Court from January 1988 until June 1990 and knew Dickson intimately.
  • Chester County Marriages Grooms Index 1885-1930

    Chester County Marriages Grooms Index 1885-1930

    Chester County Marriages Grooms Index 1885-1930 Groom's Last Name Groom's First Name Middle Name Groom's Date of Birth Groom's Age Bride's First Name Bride's Last Name Date of Application Date of Marriage Place of Marriage License # Mabin Daniel ThomasOctober 26, 1870 Ida Boyer December 29, 1902 Coatesville 9520 MacAdam Charles A 25 Bessie Kramer September 22, 1924 Phoenixville 25313 MacAdams Robert A 41 Mary Moses April 22, 1926 Kimberton 26349 MacAfee Jacob LApril 8, 1883 Annie Thomas May 7, 1904 Nantmeal Village 10390 MacAfee WalterMay 26, 1877 Carrie Eyrich July 13, 1901 Marsh 8479 MacAfee William P1863 Lizzie Murray July 31, 1886 307 MacArthur Hugh 22 Ruth Heller August 9, 1930 West Chester 30408 Macaulay John WDecember 20, 1872 Mary McClure December 10, 1902 Guthriesville 9469 MacCain Howard S 21 Ella Schroder April 17, 1930 West Chester 30051 MacCleary Howard Ellsworth 21 Evelyn Clarke January 8, 1927 West Chester 26948 MacDade William Henry 33 Nellie Wilson April 21, 1919 Phoenixville 21345 MacDaniel George 22 Gertrude Tallen June 29, 1927 Philadelphia 27332 MacDonald Frank CAugust 30, 1889 Alice Whibley April 15, 1911 Coatesville 15369 MacDonald Frederick T 45 Jane Chalfant February 8, 1916 Philadelphia 18984 MacDonald George 48 Elizabeth Ralph November 5, 1925 West Chester 26088 MacDonald Harry MOctober 13, 1873 Bertha Kerns June 18, 1913 West Grove 17110 MacDonald Samuel FJanuary 22, 1868 Carrie Mercer June 26, 1895 Coatesville 4855 MacDonald Stephen GJuly 5, 1872 Marie Vail September 28, 1899 Chatham 7164 MacDonald Walter
  • Brian Dickson: a Judge's Journey by Robert J, Sharpe and Kent Roach Toronto: Osgoode Societyfor Canadian Legal History, 2003, Pp

    Brian Dickson: a Judge's Journey by Robert J, Sharpe and Kent Roach Toronto: Osgoode Societyfor Canadian Legal History, 2003, Pp

    362 OTTAWA LAW REVIEW REVUE DE DROIT D'OTTAWA 36:2 Brian Dickson: A Judge's Journey by Robert J, Sharpe and Kent Roach Toronto: Osgoode Societyfor Canadian Legal History, 2003, Pp. 576. THIS ATTRACTIVE BOOK IS PUBLISHED by the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History which has contributed so much to the preservation of our legal heritage. Written by two distinguished scholars, Robert J. Sharpe, now a member of the Ontario Court of Appeal, and Kent Roach, Professor of Law at the University of Toronto, it provides a unique insight into decision- making in the Supreme Court of Canada. Brian Dickson was appointed to the Supreme Court in 1973 directly from the Manitoba Court of Appeal. In 1984, on the death of Bora Laskin, he was appointed Chief Justice and served until he retired in 1990. He spent some 27 years, the greater part of his professional life, as a judge. As a young lawyer practicing before the Court, I met the Chief Justice on many occa- sions and after his retirement I worked with him on implementation of the Canadian Bar Association's report on the civil justice system. While Dickson was a strong and principled leader of the Court, and introduced a number of administrative reforms, it is his Supreme Court opinions, renowned for their clarity and simplicity of expression, including those important decisions which lay down the rules for the interpretation of our individual rights and freedoms, which are his lasting legacy. Robert Sharpe worked as Executive Legal Officer at the Supreme Court from January 1988 until June 1990 and knew Dickson intimately.