DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessing Impacts of Habitat Loss on Freshwater Mussel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assessing Impacts of Habitat Loss on Freshwater Mussel Clemson University TigerPrints All Dissertations Dissertations 5-2018 Water-Electricity Nexus: Assessing Impacts of Habitat Loss on Freshwater Mussel Assemblages in the Savannah Basin, South Carolina Snehal Subhash Mhatre Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations Recommended Citation Mhatre, Snehal Subhash, "Water-Electricity Nexus: Assessing Impacts of Habitat Loss on Freshwater Mussel Assemblages in the Savannah Basin, South Carolina" (2018). All Dissertations. 2120. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/2120 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WATER-ELECTRICITY NEXUS: ASSESSING IMPACTS OF HABITAT LOSS ON FRESHWATER MUSSEL ASSEMBLAGES IN THE SAVANNAH BASIN, SOUTH CAROLINA A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Wildlife and Fisheries Biology by Snehal Subhash Mhatre May 2018 Accepted by: Dr. Alan R. Johnson, Committee Chair Dr. Kyle Barrett Dr. John Hains Dr. John Rodgers, Jr. ABSTRACT The environmental effects of energy production are well known, yet its exact impacts on freshwater resources are often difficult to recognize and measure. Freshwater mussels are extremely imperiled organisms which act as sentinels of freshwater streams and are greatly understudied in context of their drastic decline caused in part due to large water demands by the energy sector. I sought to estimate historic, current and forecasted water use by electricity generation at national, regional and local- scale. To relate the impacts of water-use by electricity generation on freshwater mussels, I conducted occupancy surveys for eight freshwater mussel species in Savannah River Basin, South Carolina. I modeled landscape and local factors potentially influencing occupancy and assessed whether the occupancy of species indicated vulnerability to the presence of impoundments. I also modeled the viability of the endangered Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata) metapopulation in response to habitat loss caused by water appropriation associated with the energy sector. The results suggest that water-use is projected to increase in the future irrespective of clean energy policies and variety of energy mix. The water consumption is predicted to increase at a local scale and the water withdrawals will vary spatially and temporally. The site occupancy varied with species and was significantly correlated with local habitat factors such as stream width and substrate heterogeneity and landscape driven factors such as % forest and presence of impoundment. The Carolina heelsplitter metapopulation exhibited a gradual decline in response to both habitat degradation and fragmentation for both effective population sizes, but the effect was more significant at lower population sizes. The findings of this ii dissertation suggest that mussel assemblages in the Savannah river basin are more likely to benefit from habitat restoration than the removal of dispersal barriers and management efforts for threatened mussel species should prioritize habitat protection and restoration. iii DEDICATION This work is dedicated to the loving memory of my grand-uncle, Mr. Janardhan Patil for his continual support and encouragement towards the pursuit of higher education. Thank you, Mama Ajoba, through your legacy you’ll be constant source of inspiration and motivation. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my gratitude to many people who contributed and helped in the completion of this dissertation. First and foremost, I thank my academic advisor and guide Dr. Alan Johnson for his constant support, unfailing encouragement and useful critiques during my tenure as a doctoral student. You provided me with a valuable opportunity of selecting a research subject of my own choosing and for that I am extremely grateful. I would like to thank my advisory committee, Dr. Kyle Barrett, Dr. John Rodgers and Dr. Johns Hains for their time, insight and much appreciated guidance in conceptualizing and implementing this research project. I would like to thank Dr. William Bridges for providing valuable statistical expertise. I would like to extend my gratitude to the Clemson University’s Department of Biological Sciences (College of Science) and Department of Forestry and Environmental Conservation (College of Agriculture, Forestry and Life Sciences) for supporting me financially with graduate teaching and grading assistantships as well as the Graduate Student Government’s Professional Enrichment Grants for travel support. Chapters 2, 3 and 4 of this dissertation are publications proposed for submission to peer-reviewed journals. Chapters 2 and 4 are co-authored with Dr. Alan Johnson and Chapter 3 with Dr. Kyle Barrett and Dr. Alan Johnson. I appreciate the contribution of the principal collaborators towards project design, statistical analysis of data and reviewing of manuscripts. I extend my gratitude to Morgan Wolf of United States Fish and Wildlife Service for her help in identifying freshwater mussel species and in data v collection. Morgan, you were always patient and understanding and a great mentor. Thanks for accompanying me on the long field visits and spending the hot summer days half submerged in water looking for the spectacular Carolina Heelsplitter. Shefali Azad- Thank you for your help with the data collection. I am glad to have known you in the capacity of a colleague and friend. My friends in India and United States- thanks for your support, love and words of wisdom. A few names warrant special thanks. Sneha- you have always believed in me and encouraged me to follow my dreams. Neela for being my first friend at Clemson and an unfailing guide. Neel, Dani and Arun for being your awesome selves and for lending an eager ear whenever I felt like venting out. Sukh for being a terrific roommate and an even better friend/soul-sister. Hrishi for your advice when I needed it the most and being able to share my love for books with you. Kanika, our shared fondness of Harry Potter and pop-culture kept me cheerful even during the gloomiest times. Sriram, Venky, Preethi, Clara, Krithika and Navdeep thanks for being solid friends and I am thrilled to have you all in my life. My old office mates; Cady, Carly and Karen- thanks for making me feel welcome at Clemson and in the department; and the recent ones, Caroline, Juliet and Yvan- for being such motivating colleagues. My family- I am grateful for your support through all the highs and lows. My godparents- Drs. Rita and Rajeev Dhamankar, your constant inspiration and valuable advice mean a lot to me. My parents, Drs. Pratibha and Subhash Mhatre - I am eternally indebted to you for inculcating the values of kindness and compassion, for stimulating intellectual curiosity since a young age, and for the endless words of encouragement vi every time I wavered. Shruti, you are a fantastic sister and a delightful ray of sunshine in my life. Lastly, Utkarsh Patil- my friend since the beginning, fiancé for the middle part and husband now. Thank you for your refreshing comedic interjections and for your firm belief and unfaltering faith in me all along. Without your constant love and support none of this would indeed be possible. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TITLE PAGE .................................................................................................................... i ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................... ii DEDICATION ................................................................................................................ iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................... v LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................... x LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................... xii CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 1 Summary ................................................................................................. 1 Literature Cited ........................................................................................ 6 II. ELECTRICITY-WATER NEXUS: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF WATER USE IN ELECTRICITY SECTOR AT THREE SPATIAL SCALES- NATIONAL, REGIONAL AND LOCAL ........................... 15 Abstract .................................................................................................. 15 Introduction ............................................................................................ 16 Methods.................................................................................................. 27 Results .................................................................................................... 31 Discussion .............................................................................................. 38 Literature Cited ...................................................................................... 44 III. LOCAL AND LANDSCAPE FACTORS INFLUENCE OCCUPANCY OF FRESHWATER MUSSELS IN THE SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Gordon Myers, Executive Director
    North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Gordon Myers, Executive Director March 1, 2016 Honorable Jimmy Dixon Honorable Chuck McGrady N.C. House of Representatives N.C. House of Representatives 300 N. Salisbury Street, Room 416B 300 N. Salisbury Street, Room 304 Raleigh, NC 27603-5925 Raleigh, NC 27603-5925 Senator Trudy Wade N.C. Senate 300 N. Salisbury Street, Room 521 Raleigh, NC 27603-5925 Dear Honorables: I am submitting this report to the Environmental Review Committee in fulfillment of the requirements of Section 4.33 of Session Law 2015-286 (H765). As directed, this report includes a review of methods and criteria used by the NC Wildlife Resources Commission on the State protected animal list as defined in G.S. 113-331 and compares them to federal and state agencies in the region. This report also reviews North Carolina policies specific to introduced species along with determining recommendations for improvements to these policies among state and federally listed species as well as nonlisted animals. If you have questions or need additional information, please contact me by phone at (919) 707-0151 or via email at [email protected]. Sincerely, Gordon Myers Executive Director North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Report on Study Conducted Pursuant to S.L. 2015-286 To the Environmental Review Commission March 1, 2016 Section 4.33 of Session Law 2015-286 (H765) directed the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) to “review the methods and criteria by which it adds, removes, or changes the status of animals on the state protected animal list as defined in G.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Francis Marion National Forest Freshwater Mussel Surveys: Final Report
    Francis Marion National Forest Freshwater Mussel Surveys: Final Report Contract No. AG-4670-C-10-0077 Prepared For: Francis Marion and Sumter National Forests 4931 Broad River Road Columbia, SC 29212-3530 Prepared by: The Catena Group, Inc. 410-B Millstone Drive Hillsborough, NC 27278 November 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background and Objectives ................................................................................. 1 2.0 STUDY AREA ........................................................................................................ 2 3.0 METHODS .............................................................................................................. 2 4.0 RESULTS ................................................................................................................ 3 5.0 DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................ 19 5.1 Mussel Habitat Conditions in the FMNF (Objective 1) ..................................... 19 5.2 Mussel Fauna of the FMNF (Objective 2) ......................................................... 19 5.2.1 Mussel Species Found During the Surveys ................................................ 19 5.3 Highest Priority Mussel Fauna Streams of the FMNF (Objective 3) ................. 25 5.4 Identified Areas that Warrant Further Study in the FMNF (Objective 4) .......... 25 6.0 LITERATURE CITED .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmigona Decorata)
    Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation 2012 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Asheville Ecological Services Field Office Asheville, North Carolina 5-YEAR REVIEW Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata) I. GENERAL INFORMATION. A. Methodology Used to Complete the Review: This 5-year review was accomplished using pertinent status data obtained from the recovery plan, peer-reviewed scientific publications, unpublished research reports, and experts on this species. Once all known and pertinent data were collected for this species, the status information was compiled and the review was completed by the species’ lead recovery biologist John Fridell in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (Service) Ecological Services Field Office in Asheville, North Carolina, with assistance from biologist Lora Zimmerman, formerly with the Service’s Ecological Services Field Office in Charleston, South Carolina. The Service published a notice in the Federal Register (FR [71 FR 42871]) announcing the 5-year review of the Carolina heelsplitter and requesting new information on the species. A 60-day public comment period was opened. No information about this species was received from the public. A draft of the 5-year review was peer-reviewed by six experts familiar with the Carolina heelsplitter. Comments received were evaluated and incorporated as appropriate. B. Reviewers. Lead Region: Southeast Region, Atlanta, Georgia - Kelly Bibb, 404/679-7132. Lead Field Office: Ecological Services Field Office, Asheville, North Carolina - John Fridell, 828/258-3939, Ext. 225. Cooperating Field Office: Ecological Services Field Office, Charleston, South Carolina - Morgan Wolf, 843/727-4707, Ext. 219. C. Background. 1.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina Department of Natural Resources
    FOREWORD Abundant fish and wildlife, unbroken coastal vistas, miles of scenic rivers, swamps and mountains open to exploration, and well-tended forests and fields…these resources enhance the quality of life that makes South Carolina a place people want to call home. We know our state’s natural resources are a primary reason that individuals and businesses choose to locate here. They are drawn to the high quality natural resources that South Carolinians love and appreciate. The quality of our state’s natural resources is no accident. It is the result of hard work and sound stewardship on the part of many citizens and agencies. The 20th century brought many changes to South Carolina; some of these changes had devastating results to the land. However, people rose to the challenge of restoring our resources. Over the past several decades, deer, wood duck and wild turkey populations have been restored, striped bass populations have recovered, the bald eagle has returned and more than half a million acres of wildlife habitat has been conserved. We in South Carolina are particularly proud of our accomplishments as we prepare to celebrate, in 2006, the 100th anniversary of game and fish law enforcement and management by the state of South Carolina. Since its inception, the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (SCDNR) has undergone several reorganizations and name changes; however, more has changed in this state than the department’s name. According to the US Census Bureau, the South Carolina’s population has almost doubled since 1950 and the majority of our citizens now live in urban areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Mollusca of Plummers Island, Maryland Author(S): Timothy A
    Freshwater Mollusca of Plummers Island, Maryland Author(s): Timothy A. Pearce and Ryan Evans Source: Bulletin of the Biological Society of Washington, 15(1):20-30. Published By: Biological Society of Washington DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2988/0097-0298(2008)15[20:FMOPIM]2.0.CO;2 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.2988/0097-0298%282008%2915%5B20%3AFMOPIM %5D2.0.CO%3B2 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Freshwater Mollusca of Plummers Island, Maryland Timothy A. Pearce and Ryan Evans (TAP) Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Section of Mollusks, 4400 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, U.S.A., e-mail: [email protected]; (RE) Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program, Pittsburgh Office, 209 Fourth Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222, U.S.A. Abstract.—We found 19 species of freshwater mollusks (seven bivalves, 12 gastropods) in the Plummers Island area, Maryland, bringing the total known for the Middle Potomac River to 42 species.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Mussel Survey Protocol for the Southeastern Atlantic Slope and Northeastern Gulf Drainages in Florida and Georgia
    FRESHWATER MUSSEL SURVEY PROTOCOL FOR THE SOUTHEASTERN ATLANTIC SLOPE AND NORTHEASTERN GULF DRAINAGES IN FLORIDA AND GEORGIA United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Services and Fisheries Resources Offices Georgia Department of Transportation, Office of Environment and Location April 2008 Stacey Carlson, Alice Lawrence, Holly Blalock-Herod, Katie McCafferty, and Sandy Abbott ACKNOWLEDGMENTS For field assistance, we would like to thank Bill Birkhead (Columbus State University), Steve Butler (Auburn University), Tom Dickenson (The Catena Group), Ben Dickerson (FWS), Beau Dudley (FWS), Will Duncan (FWS), Matt Elliott (GDNR), Tracy Feltman (GDNR), Mike Gangloff (Auburn University), Robin Goodloe (FWS), Emily Hartfield (Auburn University), Will Heath, Debbie Henry (NRCS), Jeff Herod (FWS), Chris Hughes (Ecological Solutions), Mark Hughes (International Paper), Kelly Huizenga (FWS), Joy Jackson (FDEP), Trent Jett (Student Conservation Association), Stuart McGregor (Geological Survey of Alabama), Beau Marshall (URSCorp), Jason Meador (UGA), Jonathon Miller (Troy State University), Trina Morris (GDNR), Ana Papagni (Ecological Solutions), Megan Pilarczyk (Troy State University), Eric Prowell (FWS), Jon Ray (FDEP), Jimmy Rickard (FWS), Craig Robbins (GDNR), Tim Savidge (The Catena Group), Doug Shelton (Alabama Malacological Research Center), George Stanton (Columbus State University), Mike Stewart (Troy State University), Carson Stringfellow (Columbus State University), Teresa Thom (FWS), Warren Wagner (Environmental Services), Deb
    [Show full text]
  • The Development and Evaluation of a Freshwater Mussel Sampling
    THE DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF A FRESHWATER MUSSEL SAMPLING PROTOCOL FOR A LARGE LOWLAND RIVER by JASON RAY MEADOR Under the direction of James T. Peterson ABSTRACT Freshwater mussels are among the most imperiled aquatic species within the southeastern United States. Mangers are faced with the task gathering information via monitoring, and making decisions based on available information about local mussel populations. I gathered data on mussel behavior, demography, distribution, and detection to develop a cost-effective protocol for monitoring freshwater mussel populations within the Altamaha River. Surface abundance, survival, occupancy, and detection varied spatially, temporally, and among species. I then developed sampling stratum within mesohabitats based on empirical data and evaluated the efficacy of several sampling protocols via simulation. Spatial and temporal variation among species emphasize the importance for properly estimating and evaluating habitat based on use and detection and suggest refraining from raw count indices. INDEX WORDS: Altamaha River, Freshwater Mussels, Occupancy, Abundance, Estimation, Robust Design, Migration Patterns, Sample Design, Detection THE DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF A FRESHWATER MUSSEL SAMPLING PROTOCOL FOR A LARGE LOWLAND RIVER by JASON RAY MEADOR B.S., North Carolina State University, 2004 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE ATHENS, GEORGIA 2008 © 2008 Jason Ray Meador All Rights Reserved THE DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF A FRESHWATER MUSSEL SAMPLING PROTOCOL FOR A LARGE LOWLAND RIVER by JASON RAY MEADOR Major Professor: James T. Peterson Committee: Brett Albanese Michael J. Conroy Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia May 2008 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many people that offered assistance throughout the duration of this project for whom I am grateful.
    [Show full text]
  • Monticello Reservoir Mussel Survey Report
    Freshwater Mussel Survey Report In Monticello Reservoir Parr Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 1894) Fairfield and Newberry Counties, South Carolina Monticello Reservoir Shoreline Habitat Prepared For: South Carolina Electric & Gas Company & Kleinschmidt Associates 204 Caughman Farm Lane, Suite 301 Lexington, SC 29072 April 14, 2016 Prepared by: Three Oaks Engineering 1000 Corporate Drive, Suite 101 Hillsborough, NC 27278 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 2.0 TARGET FEDERALLY PROTECTED SPECIES DESCRIPTION: Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata) .................................................................................. 1 2.1 Species Characteristics ..................................................................................................... 1 2.2 Distribution and Habitat Requirements ............................................................................ 3 2.3 Threats to Species............................................................................................................. 4 2.4 Designated Critical Habitat .............................................................................................. 4 3.0 TARGET PETITIONED FEDERALLY PROTECTED SPECIES DESCRIPTION: Savannah Lilliput (Toxolasma pullus) ............................................................................................ 8 3.1 Species Characteristics ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reconnaissance Survey of the Freshwater Mussel Fauna of the Lower Saluda and Congaree Rivers, Lake Murray, and Selected Tributaries
    RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY OF THE FRESHWATER MUSSEL FAUNA OF THE LOWER SALUDA AND CONGAREE RIVERS, LAKE MURRAY, AND SELECTED TRIBUTARIES Prepared for Kleinschmidt Associates West Columbia, SC by John M. Alderman Alderman Environmental Services, Inc. Pittsboro, NC 31 October 2006 Table of Contents Introduction..................................................................................…3 Methods............................................................................................3 Results..............................................................................................6 Discussion........................................................................................6 Acknowledgements..........................................................................8 References........................................................................................8 Figures..............................................................................................9 Tables.............................................................................................28 Appendix - station-by-station survey results ............................... 38 2 Introduction More than 300 recognized species and subspecies of freshwater mussels are known from North America north of Mexico. Nearly 72% of these taxa are considered endangered, threatened, or of special concern to the scientific community (Williams et al. 1992). Within the Santee-Cooper River Basin, Johnson (1970) lists 21 species from the basin. Because of incorrect synonymies, Lasmigona
    [Show full text]
  • Carolina Lance (Elliptio Angustata)
    Supplemental Volume: Species of Conservation Concern SC SWAP 2015 Carolina Lance Elliptio angustata Contributor (2005): Jennifer Price (SCNDR) Reviewed and Edited (2012): William Poly (SCDNR) DESCRIPTION Taxonomy and Basic Description The shell of the Carolina Lance is elongate and elliptical or subrhomboid in shape. It is slightly compressed and rather thin, with a length of up to 140 mm (5.6 in.). The outer shell is olive but may become nearly black in older individuals; the inner shell is purple in color (Bogan and Alderman 2004, 2008). Status NatureServe (2011) identifies the Carolina Lance with a global ranking of apparently stable (G4) and a state ranking of vulnerable (S3) in South Carolina. POPULATION SIZE AND DISTRIBUTION The Carolina Lance is known to range from the Ogeechee River in Georgia north to the Potomac River in Virginia and Maryland. This species is widespread within South Carolina (Johnson 1970). It is occasionally found in abundance in several locations throughout the State including some stretches of the Great Pee Dee River, the Little Pee Dee River, and the Black River, but in other locations it is uncommon (Taxonomic Expertise Committee meeting 2004). HABITAT AND NATURAL COMMUNITY REQUIREMENTS The Carolina Lance seems to prefer sand and sandy gravel substrates and is often found at the edge of aquatic vegetation (Bogan and Alderman 2004, 2008). CHALLENGES Observations suggest that this species is sensitive to channel modification, pollution, sedimentation, and low oxygen conditions, but we do not know how the relative sensitivity of this species to these challenges compares to other species. CONSERVATION ACCOMPLISHMENTS The breeding season of E.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Project Title: an Evaluation of Hemolymph Extraction As a Non
    Project Title: An Evaluation of Hemolymph Extraction as a Non-Lethal Sampling Method for Genetic Identification of Freshwater Mussel Species in Southeastern North Carolina Final Report: 2004-09 FHWA/NC/2006-11 Principle investigators: Michael A. McCartney Ami E. Wilbur Department of Biology and Marine Biology Center for Marine Science University of North Carolina Wilmington 5600 Marvin K. Moss Lane Wilmington, North Carolina 28409 February 2007 1 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/NC/2006-11 … … … … 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date An Evaluation of hemolymph extraction as a non-lethal sampling February 2007 method for genetic identification of freshwater mussels species in southeastern North Carolina 6. Performing Organization Code … … 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Michael A. McCartney, Ami E. Wilbur … … 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Department of Biology and Marine Biology, Center for Marine Science … … UNCW, 5600 Marvin K Moss Lane, Wilmington, NC 28409 11. Contract or Grant No. … … 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Research and Analysis Group Final Report 1 South Wilmington Street July 2003 – December 2005 Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 2004-09 Supplementary Notes: … … 16. Abstract Identification of freshwater mussel species and subpopulations is challenging due to the plasticity of morphological characters. Molecular analyses are a powerful alternative for systematics and for biological surveys and restoration efforts. Yet most molecular methods require sacrificing animals for tissue sampling, an approach that cannot be applied to threatened and endangered species.
    [Show full text]
  • List of the Freshwater Bivalve Species of North Carolina
    List of the Freshwater Bivalve species of North Carolina - printed 2021-09-24 This is a listing of the bivalve mollusk species that have been documented or reported to occur in the freshwater systems of the state. Because bivalves can be very difficult to identify to genus and to species, and because there are a number of historical (often over 100 years ago) and poorly documented reports of many species, it is impossible to state the number of freshwater bivalve species that have been documented in the state. The scientific and common names used in this list are from Williams et al. (2017) for the taxa in the family Unionidae, and from NatureServe Explorer for the taxa in Corbiculidae and Sphaeriidae. The list also includes the State Rank, Global Rank, State Status, and U.S. Status (if it has such statuses) for each species. The ranks are those of the Biotics database of the N. C. Natural Heritage Program and NatureServe, October 2016. Ranks in parentheses are provided by the N.C. Biodiversity Project, based on data in Williams et al. (2017). Status information is given on Page 3. Unionidae: Freshwater Mussels [48] [Rank: State Global] [Status: State US] Range (by river basins) 1 Alasmidonta heterodon ................ Dwarf Wedgemussel ................... [S1 G1G2] [E E] NS, TP 2 Alasmidonta raveneliana .............. Appalachian Elktoe ...................... [S1 G1] [E E] FB, LT 3 Alasmidonta undulata ................... Triangle Floater ........................... [S3 G4] [T] CF, CH, NS, RO, TP, YP 4 Alasmidonta varicosa ................... Brook Floater ............................... [S2 G3] [E] CA, CF, NS, YP 5 Alasmidonta viridis ....................... Slippershell Mussel ..................... [S1 G4G5] [E] FB, LT 6 Cyclonaias tuberculata ................
    [Show full text]