DOCSLIB.ORG

Obituary for Prof. Frank Schlesinger

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Obituary for Prof. Frank Schlesinger Obituary for Prof. Frank Schlesinger J.H. Oort Originally published in Dutch in Hemel & Dampkring, 43, 27-30 (1945). In these days of war, in which his compatriots are struggling to bring us, we hope soon, the liberation, my thoughts go at a quiet moment, however strange this may seem so near to the battle, to a deceased friend. 1 Among the names of the astronomers of fame, who passed away from us dur- ing the war years, that of Frank Schlesinger strikes us deepest. No foreign as- tronomer was as closely connected to the Netherlands as he was. In the first place through ties of close and faithful friendship, first with the elderly, Kapteyn, whom he held in high esteem, later with his peer de Sitter and with the young: Schilt, Brouwer and Oort, who came to work at the Yale Observatory as a result of this friendship with de Sitter. He used to tell me that the most valuable thing that he remembered from his trip to Europe and the congress of the International As- tronomical Union in Rome in 1922 was the friendship with de Sitter. Whoever watched him later on during his repeated visits to Leiden could easily convince himself how true this was; once after a trip to France, which by the way was a country he was very fond of, he sighed with profound satisfaction: ‘it feels like coming home’. One of the first images that come to mind when I think of Prof. Schlesinger is how, one evening just after my arrival as a 22-year-old young man at the Yale Observatory next to me, sitting on the sofa in his living room, he showed pictures of groups of astronomers at earlier international gatherings and how with warm feeling of appreciation of others he described various figures through his words. The way he talked about these astronomers could make one think that he was talking about the closely related members of a large and scattered family. And so, I believe, he also regarded a large part of the astronomers in the whole world almost as members of his family. For that part of the ‘family’ that lived within easy reach he formed a natural center, which every month brought together a number of astronomers, a.o. Shapley from Cambridge, Slocum from Middletown, Russell from Princeton, Miller from Swarthmore, Benjamin Boss from Albany, all members of the ‘Neighborhood Club’, in New Haven. Later, when he was chosen to be president of the International Astronomical Union and become for some time the center of all astronomers, to be elected to this position for which he naturally was suited, filled him with great joy. Professor Schlesinger was a human with deeply feeling, who could be a warm and faithful friend. He had a fine sense of humor, which often enlightened difficult situations. Almost inhumanly strict in the standards of his own work, he possessed the gift of fully admiring what others had accomplished, and he was particularly mild in the face of shortages in the work of others. Schlesinger’s work is for the most part focused on the precise determination of the positions the stars. Born in New York (11 May 1871), he attended the College of the City of New York and completed his studies at Columbia University in the same city, where he obtained his doctorate in 1898 on a thesis entitled ‘The Prae- 2 sepe Group: Measurement and reduction of Rutherfurd photographs’. In his early association with this pioneer of photography, L.M. Rutherfurd, the foundation was laid for his life’s work. Already then he formulated the ideal to use his acquired experience for the determination of parallaxes of fixed stars. Parallax measure- ments were at that time the great task of astronomy; without parallaxes one could not know distances of stars. But this problem was far from being solved. In 1838, after several centuries of trying in vain, Bessel, Struve and Henderson had succeeded in measuring the parallax of a fixed star almost simultaneously, inde- pendently of each other, so that astronomers had started to concentrate system- atically on these measurements. Although, mainly due to the introduction of the heliometer, the technique of parallax measurement of a fixed star had improved enormously, the actual harvest was still small, so that in an article in 1899, entitled ‘Suggestions for the determination of stellar parallax by means of photography’, Schlesinger remarked that in the 60’s, since the first successes, no more than 25 to 30 stellar parallaxes have been determined that could be trusted at the level 000:05! In this article Schlesinger outlined his own program. He did not yet have the op- portunity to start it himself. For he got a job as an astronomer at the International Latitude Service, for which he had to build up a station at Ukiah in California. There he directed the observations of latitude variation from 1899 to 1903, when he was appointed astronomer at the Yerkes Observatory, which opened the way to execute his parallax plans with the beautiful 20 meter long telescope there. The problem was to determine the position of the star whose parallax one wanted to measure relative to a few faint stars around it. The difficulty lay in the enormous accuracy required to determine angles of only a few hundredths of a second of arc. Here Schlesinger’s great technical ingenuity and his particular talent for efficiency and organization worked together to create a model of procedures and methods, which with one stroke raised the parallax determination of fixed stars to a com- pletely new level. His working method was soon adopted by all stellar observed involved in parallax measurements, and the scheme designed by Schlesinger was so remarkably well thought out during the years 1903-’05, that I do not know of the slightest detail for which anyone has managed to suggest even a single im- provement in the years since. How the productivity in quantity as well as in qual- ity has increased as a result of Schlesinger’s initiative can be appreciated from the fact that in 1942 of about 5500 stars the parallax had been determined according to Schlesinger’s method, while the mean errors on average did not exceed ±000:01; which compared to the 25 parallaxes with uncertainty of the order of ±000:05 at the beginning of the century! Schlesinger’s own contribution to that harvest was substantial, first at the Yerkes Observatory, later as director of the Allegheny Ob- 3 servatory in Pittsburgh, where he was able to have a telescope designed entirely for this purpose. By accepting an appointment as director of the Yale Observatory, he finally found the opportunity to start in earnest the parallax measurements in the southern sky as well. In the workshop of the Yale Observatory, under his direct supervision, a large telescope was built to be established in Johannesburg. 4 Figure 1: The great telescope of the Yerkes Observatory, with which Schlesinger performed his first parallax determinations. The telescope has an objective lense of 102 cm diameter and a focal distance of over 19 meters. In the meantime, he also gave his attention and manpower to another large undertaking. In the second half of the nineteenth century the collaboration of about twenty observatories (including that in Leiden) led to a catalog with pre- cise positions of about a quarter of a million of the brightest stars, the so-called Astronomische Gesellschaft Katalog. Schlesinger saw that it was possible with the help of photographic observations to be determined these same positions with much greater accuracy and much less effort, and he started around 1920 with ex- periments in that direction. These finally led to the observation of wide zones in the sky; before his retirement, new positions had already been determined for more than a quarter of the whole sky and were published in the Publications of the Yale Observatory. The importance of this enterprise, in which the Cape Ob- servatory now also participates, lies, on the one hand, in the precise determination of the positions and, on the other hand, in the determination of the motions of the stars, which can be deduced by comparison with the original Astronomische Gesellschaft Katalog. For the first time, Schlesinger used large-field telescopes for these positional measurements, with which areas of 5◦× 5◦, later even of 10◦× 11◦, could be photographed. The Astronomische Gesellschaft itself, stirred by this example, organized in the years 1928-’32 with such instruments a re-observation of the northern part of the great catalog. In order to be able to reduce the positions measured on the plates to real po- sitions in the sky, it is necessary to know these positions from a number of stars on each plate. These have to be measured with the meridian circle, the classi- cal instrument for position determination. Here was an opportunity to collaborate with the Leiden Observatory, where Dr. Hins undertook the observing the ‘stan- dard’ stars for one of Schlesinger’s celestial zones with the meridian circle. It went beyond this cooperation between the two observatories. After the founding of the great Yale Telescope in Johannesburg in 1925 the Leiden observer in Johan- nesburg repeatedly observed with this beautiful instrument for his own programs. Conversely, at the Leiden Observatory Dr. van Herk participated in the observa- tions of asteroids in a major plan set up by Dr. Brouwer at the Yale Observatory to improve the foundations of the star positions. The Yale Station in South Africa again gave its strong cooperation to a part of Kapteyn’s ‘Plan of Selected Areas’, an undertaking that now has its center in Groningen and in Prof.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dirk Brouwer
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES D I R K B R O U W ER 1902—1966 A Biographical Memoir by G . M . C LEMENCE Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1970 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON D.C. DIRK BROUWER September 1, 1902-January 31, 1966 BY G. M. CLEMENCE IRK BROUWER, who contributed more to dynamical astron- D omy than any other astronomer of his time, died on January 31, 1966, after a week in hospital; his death was occa- sioned by an acute disorder of the heart. He is survived by his widow and an only son, James. Brouwer was born in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, on September 1, 1902, the son of a civil service employee. As a stu- dent in the University of Leiden he studied mathematics and astronomy, coming under the influence of Willem de Sitter, who in his own day was the dean of that branch of astronomy in which Brouwer was to do most of his work. Receiving the Ph.D. degree in 1927 under de Sitter, Brouwer came to the United States as a fellow of the International Education Board, spending a year at the University of California in Berkeley and at Yale University, where he was to remain the rest of his life. His initial appointment at Yale was in 1928 as research as- sistant to Ernest W. Brown, who was then the greatest living authority on the motion of the moon.
    [Show full text]
  • 212 Publications of the Some Pioneer
    212 PUBLICATIONS OF THE SOME PIONEER OBSERVERS1 By Frank Schlesinger In choosing a subject upon which to speak to you this eve- ning, I have had to bear in mind that, although this is a meeting of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, not many of my audience are astronomers, and I am therefore debarred from speaking on too technical a matter. Under these circumstances I have thought that a historical subject, and one that has been somewhat neglected by the, formal historians of our science, may be of interest. I propose to outline, very briefly of course, the history of the advances that have been made in the accuracy of astronomical measurements. To do this within an hour, I must confine myself to the measurement of the relative places of objects not very close together, neglecting not only measure- ments other than of angles, but also such as can be carried out, for example, by the filar micrometer and the interferometer; these form a somewhat distinct chapter and would be well worth your consideration in an evening by themselves. It is clear to you, I hope, in how restricted a sense I am using the word observer ; Galileo, Herschel, and Barnard were great observers in another sense and they were great pioneers. But of their kind of observing I am not to speak to you tonight. My pioneers are five in number ; they are Hipparchus in the second century b.c., Tycho in the sixteenth century, Bradley in the eighteenth, Bessel in the first half of the nineteenth century and Rüther fur d in the second half.
    [Show full text]
  • Frank Schlesinger 1871-1943
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIRS VOLUME XXIV THIRD MEMOIR BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIR OF FRANK SCHLESINGER 1871-1943 BY DIRK BROUWER PRESENTED TO THE ACADEMY AT THE ANNUAL MEETING, 1945 FRANK SCHLESINGER 1871-1943 BY DIRK BROUWER Frank Schlesinger was born in New York City on May n, 1871. His father, William Joseph Schlesinger (1836-1880), and his mother, Mary Wagner Schlesinger (1832-1892), both natives of the German province of Silesia, had emigrated to the United States. In Silesia they had lived in neighboring vil- lages, but they did not know each other until they met in New York, in 1855, at the home of Mary's cousin. They were mar- ried in 1857 and had seven children, all of whom grew to maturity. Frank was the youngest and, after 1939, the last survivor. His father's death, in 1880, although it brought hardships to the family, was not permitted to interfere with Frank's educa- tion. He attended public school in New York City, and eventually entered the College of the City of New York, receiv- ing the degree of Bachelor of Science in 1890. His aptitude for mathematical science, already evident in grammar school, be- came more marked in the higher stages of his education when he began to show a preference for applied mathematics. Upon completing his undergraduate work it was not possible for him to continue with graduate studies. He had to support himself, and his health at that time made it desirable for him to engage in outdoor activities.
    [Show full text]
  • George Ellery Hale Papers 10142-MS
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt067nb6q6 Online items available Guide to the George Ellery Hale Papers 10142-MS Daniel J. Kevles, Charlotte E. Erwin, Peter Sachs Collopy Carnegie Institution of Washington, California Institute of Technology, American Institute of Physics Center for the History of Physics Revised to accompany the web publication of the George Ellery Hale Papers. California Institute of Technology Archives and Special Collections 2018 1200 East California Blvd. MC B215-74 Pasadena, California 91125 [email protected] URL: http://archives.caltech.edu/ Guide to the George Ellery Hale 10142-MS 1 Papers 10142-MS Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: California Institute of Technology Archives and Special Collections Title: George Ellery Hale Papers creator: Hale, George Ellery, 1868-1938 Identifier/Call Number: 10142-MS Physical Description: 73 linear feet Date (inclusive): 1863-1950 Date (bulk): 1882-1938 Abstract: George Ellery Hale (1868–1938) was an influential astrophysicist and science administrator. This collection of Hale's scientific, professional, and personal papers documents his roles in inventing the spectrohelioscope; promoting international cooperation among scientists; and founding major observatories, as well as the California Institute of Technology, Huntington Library, Astrophysical Journal, and National Research Council. https://hale.archives.caltech.edu/ Conditions Governing Access Most of this collection is available on the web, linked from individual folder records in this finding aid. If you would like to examine the original paper copies of materials in series 1 through 9, please email [email protected] to apply for an appointment. The original Director's Files of the Mount Wilson Observatory are located at the Huntington Library and available to qualified researchers by application through their Reader Services Department.
    [Show full text]
  • Ernest William Brown 1866-1938
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIRS VOLUME XXI SIXTH MEMOIR BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIR OF ERNEST WILLIAM BROWN 1866-1938 BY FRANK SCHLESINGER and DIRK BROUWER PRESENTED TO THE ACADEMY AT THE AUTUMN MEETING, 1939 ERNEST WILLIAM BROWN 1866-1938 BY FRANK SCHLESINGER AND DIRK BROUWER Ernest William Brown's forbears on both sides lived at Hull, England, or in its immediate neighborhood. His father's father, William Brown (born 1806) was in early life a sailor, later a ship owner and a ship broker. His father (1837-1893), also named William, was for part of his life a farmer and later a lumber merchant. In 1863 he married Emma Martin (1839- 1870), by whom he had four children, two boys and two girls. Of these Ernest (1866 November 29 to 1938 July 22) was the second oldest. In 1870 a scarlet fever epidemic carried off his mother and his younger brother. Ernest was not quite four years old at this time and he and his two sisters were looked after by a maiden aunt for about five years, when his father married again. When Ernest was six years old he began to attend a day school in Hull. The master was at once impressed by his talent for music and urged his father to let the boy prepare for a musical career. This plan seems to have been given serious consideration; and later Ernest, and his elder sister Ella, studied the piano under the guidance of their step-mother. But later his tastes turned toward mathematics in which he greatly excelled both at the day school and at the Hull and East Riding College.
    [Show full text]
  • Ida M. Barney, Ace Astrometrist by E
    STATUS The Committee on the Status of Women in Astronomy - American Astronomical Society JUNE 1990 Ida M. Barney, Ace Astrometrist by E. Dorrit Hoffleit As chief assistant to Frank Schlesinger at Yale from 1922 until his retirement in 1941, Ida M. Barney (1886-1982) sincerely claimed that those were the happiest years of her life. At the same time, however, she had been irked that her pay and rank were far below those of men with comparable qualifications. Daughter of a Professor of Civil Engineering at Yale, Ida attended Smith College and was graduated with the Class of 1908 and elected to Phi Beta Kappa. She then entered the Graduate School at Yale earning her Ph.D. in Mathematics in 1911. Until she became Schlesinger's assistant, she taught mathematics at various womens’ colleges (Rollins, Smith, Lake Erie, and Meredith Colleges). She left the teaching profession because she felt frustrated trying to cram mathematics into students who had little grasp or interest in the subject. Frank Schlesinger, Director of the Yale Observatory from 1920 to 1941, as early as 1901 had written George Ellery Hale, "I am thoroughly in favor of employing women as measurers and computers and I think their services might well be extended to other departments. Not only are women available at smaller salaries than are men, but for routine work they have important advantages. Men are more likely to grow impatient after the novelty of the work has worn off and would be harder to retain for that reason." After coming to Yale, Schlesinger started a group called The Neighbors, astronomers from the New England and neighboring states which were to meet informally about four times a year to discuss their research and exchange ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Pioneering Women in the Spectral Classification of Stars
    Phys. perspect. 4 (2002) 370–398 © Birkha¨user Verlag, Basel, 2002 1422–6944/02/040370–29 Pioneering Women in the Spectral Classification of Stars E. Dorrit Hoffleit* Spectra reveal more about the constitution of stars than can be ascertained by any other means. About 1867 Angelo Secchi classified stellar spectra into five distinct categories. No significant improvements in his system could be made until the advent of dry-plate photography. Then both Henry Draper in New York and Edward C. Pickering at Harvard began taking hundreds of spectrum plates. After Draper’s death in 1882, his widow endowed The Henry Draper Memorial at Harvard for the analysis of stellar spectra. Pickering then employed mainly women to help him devise a more detailed system of classification than Secchi’s. Ultimately, the most appreciated lady became the one who dutifully carried out the routine work of classifying exactly as she was told, while another slowly made independent new discoveries that Pickering would not accept even after other astronomers proved them to be highly significant. Key words: Stellar spectra; HD system; MK system; stellar magnitude; Annie J. Cannon; Henry Draper; Anna Palmer Draper; Williamina Payton Fleming; Ejnar Hertzsprung; Antonia C. DeP. P. Maury; Edward C. Pickering. Introduction: Historical Background I am thoroughly in favor of employing women as measurers and computers and I think their services might well be extended to other departments. Not only are women available at smaller salaries than are men, but for routine work they have important advantages. Men are more likely to grow impatient after the novelty of the work has worn off and would be harder to retain for that reason.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Decade Between 1918 and 1928, Leiden Observatory Changed
    Teach and travel Leiden Observatory and the renaissance of Dutch astronomy in the Interwar years David Baneke1 Introduction On Sunday 3 March 1918 Ernst Frederik van de Sande Bakhuyzen, director of Leiden Observatory, unexpectedly died. Within days Willem de Sitter was appointed acting director, pending further decisions. De Sitter immediately contacted J.C. Kapteyn, the grand old man of Dutch astronomy and his former mentor in Groningen, to discuss the future of the observatory. This was their chance to resurrect the observatory after decades of stagnation. It was also a chance to make astronomy join the ‘second golden age’ of Dutch science that played a prominent role in contemporary cultural nationalism.2 Scientists such as J.D. van der Waals, H.A. Lorentz, Heike Kamerlingh Onnes and Hugo de Vries were considered the direct heirs of Christiaan Huygens and Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, the heroes of the first ‘golden age’ in the seventeenth century. Kapteyn was a national pride too, but he was a lonely figure. He had built his reputation against all odds, having started without any facilities, funding or staff.3 The rest of Dutch astronomy did not share in the successes of the other sciences. The two observatories in Leiden and Utrecht were small and unexciting. A reorganisation and expansion of Leiden Observatory might change that. De Sitter and Kapteyn seized the moment, and they succeeded beyond expectation. During De Sitter’s directorship, from 1918 until 1934, Leiden Observatory changed from a sleepy, run- down institute into an international centre of astronomy.4 It was the home institute of Willem de Sitter, Ejnar Hertzsprung and Jan Oort, and it became a breeding ground for a new generation of astronomers who would become prominent scientists in their own right, including Bart Bok, Gerard Kuiper, Dirk Brouwer, Willem Luyten, Piet Oosterhoff, Willem van den Bos and Adriaan Blaauw.
    [Show full text]
  • Descendants of William Champion
    Descendants of William Champion Charles E. G. Pease Pennyghael Isle of Mull Descendants of William Champion 1-William Champion1,2 was born in 1595. William married someone. He had one son: Nehemiah. 2-Nehemiah Champion1,2,3 was born in 1614. Nehemiah married someone. He had one son: Nehemiah. 3-Nehemiah Champion1,2,3,4,5,6 was born in 1649 and died on 1 May 1722 in Bristol, Gloucestershire at age 73. General Notes: Champion family (per. c.1670– 1794), metal manufacturers and merchants, came to prominence with Nehemiah [ii] Champion (1649– 1722), son of Nehemiah [i] Champion (b. 1614). As a merchant dealing countrywide in iron goods, and a Quaker from about 1670, Nehemiah [ii] became Bristol agent and largest customer of Abraham Darby (1678– 1717) of Coalbrookdale. He appears also to have represented Bristol interests in Newcomen's new atmospheric pump for mining. His sons included Nehemiah [iii] and Richard (1680– 1764). He died on 1 May 1722 at Bristol. Noted events in his life were: • He worked as a Tobacconist in 1666 in Bristol, Gloucestershire. • He had a residence in Stapleton, Bristol, Gloucestershire. • He worked as a Merchant in Bristol, Gloucestershire. Nehemiah married Sarah. They had four children: Anne, Richard, Richard, and Nehemiah. 4-Anne Champion4 was born on 20 Aug 1666 in Stapleton, Bristol, Gloucestershire. Anne married Edward Watts4 on 26 Feb 1691 in FMH Frenchay, Bristol. They had two children: Sarah and Sarah. 5-Sarah Watts4 was born in 1691 and died in 1693 at age 2. 5-Sarah Watts4 was born in 1694.
    [Show full text]
  • Office of the National Research Council, Washington, D. C., on March 8, 1919
    VOL. 6, 1920 INTERNATIONAL ASTRONOMICAL UNION 349 REPORT ON THE ORGANIZATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASTRONOMICAL UNION' Presented for the American Section, International Astronomical Union By W. W. CAMPBELL, Chairman, AND JOEL STUBBINS, Secretary The American delegation to the conference of interallied academies held in London in October, 1918, had proposed that the existing organiza- tions relating internationally to one and the same subject, to Astronomy for example, should be succeeded by a single society so formulated as to serve the purposes of all the associations from which they should with- draw. This policy was approved by the conference. At meetings held later in Paris it was decided that representatives of Astronomy in the al- lied and associated nations should meet in Brussels in July, 1919, to create the International Astronomical Union. The American delegation of astronomers was organized under the aus-. pices of the National Research Council. The Council proposed that the delegates be chosen by a subsidiary organization known as the American Section of the (proposed) Astronomical Union; this Section for the present occasion to be constituted as follows: National Academy of Sciences-5 members: W. W. CAMPBBLL, GEORGE E. HALI, A. A. MICHELSON, F. R. MOULTON, FRANK SCHLESINGER. American Astronomical Society-20 members: C. G. ABBOT, W. S. ADAMS, R. G. AITKZN, S. I. BAILZY, E. E. BARNARD, L. A. BAUIR, BENJAMIN Boss, E. W. BROWN, W. S. EICHELBERGER, E. B. FROST, J. F. HAYFORD, W. J. HUMPHRuYS, W. J. HusszY, A. 0. L}USCHNER, S. A. MITCHELL, H. N. RUSSELL, C. E. ST. JOHN, F. H. SEAREs, V.
    [Show full text]
  • Anton Pannekoek and the Modernization of the Dutch Astronomical Community Chapter Author(S): David Baneke
    Amsterdam University Press Chapter Title: Pannekoek’s One Revolution: Anton Pannekoek and the Modernization of the Dutch Astronomical Community Chapter Author(s): David Baneke Book Title: Anton Pannekoek Book Subtitle: Ways of Viewing Science and Society Book Editor(s): Chaokang Tai, Bart van der Steen, Jeroen van Dongen Published by: Amsterdam University Press. (2019) Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvp7d57c.7 JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms This book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Amsterdam University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Anton Pannekoek This content downloaded from 131.211.104.156 on Tue, 29 Oct 2019 08:52:35 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms 5 Pannekoek’s One Revolution Anton Pannekoek and the Modernization of the Dutch Astronomical Community David Baneke Abstract When Anton Pannekoek left Dutch astronomy in 1905, he left a stagnat- ing, uninspiring research community. When he returned a decade later, things started to change in the Dutch astronomical community.
    [Show full text]
  • William Lewis Elkin 1855-1933
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIRS VOLUME XVIII—EIGHTH MEMOIR BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIR OF WILLIAM LEWIS ELKIN 1855-1933 BY FRANK SCHLESINGER PRESENTED TO THE ACADEMY AT THE AUTUMN MEETING, 1936 WILLIAM LEWIS ELKIN 1855-1933 BY FRANK SCHLESINGER William Lewis Elkin was born in New Orleans on the 29th of April, 1855. His father, Lewis Elkin (1815-1867), was a teacher and had kept a private school, but at the time of William's birth he was Inspector of Public Schools for the city. Shortly afterwards he went into the business of manu- facturing carpets and this proved to be an unusually successful venture. William's mother, Jane (1826-1890), was the daugh- ter of the Reverend John Fitch of Thetford, Vermont. (The name of this village of only a few hundred dwellers is already well known to astronomers as the birthplace in 1838 of S. W. Burnham, the great observer of double stars.) Jane Fitch came to New Orleans with her mother when a young girl, and there she was married to Lewis Elkin in 1846. Five children were born to them of whom William was the third and the only one to reach maturity, the four others having died in infancy. In 1867 Lewis Elkin was appointed Commissioner for the State of Louisiana at the Paris Exposition. He was pre- paring to go abroad with his wife and his son when he suddenly fell ill and died within a few clays. Close friends who were going to Europe prevailed upon Mrs. Elkin not to change her plans, and accordingly she and William left America for what they thought would be a matter of a few months.
    [Show full text]