DOCSLIB.ORG

Universal Quantum Modifications to General Relativistic Time Dilation In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Universal Quantum Modifications to General Relativistic Time Dilation In Universal quantum modifications to general relativistic time dilation in delocalised clocks Shishir Khandelwal1,2, Maximilian P. E. Lock3, and Mischa P. Woods1,4 1Institute for Theoretical Physics, ETH Zurich,¨ Switzerland 2Group of Applied Physics, University of Geneva, Switzerland 3Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information (IQOQI), Vienna, Austria 4Department of Computer Science, University College London, United Kingdom The theory of relativity associates a proper to clarify. In the latter, time is not treated on the time with each moving object via its world line. same footing as other observable quantities in the In quantum theory however, such well-defined theory | it is a parameter, rather than being repre- trajectories are forbidden. After introducing sented by a self-adjoint operator. This aspect of the a general characterisation of quantum clocks, theory of quantum mechanics troubled its founders; we demonstrate that, in the weak-field, low- Wolfgang Pauli, for example, famously noted the im- velocity limit, all “good” quantum clocks ex- possibility of a self-adjoint operator corresponding to perience time dilation as dictated by general time [5]. Specifically, a quantum observable with out- relativity when their state of motion is classical come t ∈ R equal to the time parameterising the sys- (i.e. Gaussian). For nonclassical states of mo- tem's evolution, can only be achieved in the limit- tion, on the other hand, we find that quantum ing case of infinite energy, and is therefore unphys- interference effects may give rise to a signifi- ical, as we discuss in Sec.2. It is however possible cant discrepancy between the proper time and to construct self-adjoint operators whose outcome is the time measured by the clock. The univer- approximately t, with an error that can in principle sality of this discrepancy implies that it is not be made arbitrarily small, in systems of finite energy simply a systematic error, but rather a quan- (see e.g. [6]). tum modification to the proper time itself. We If one takes an operationalist viewpoint, one can also show how the clock’s delocalisation leads draw conclusions about time by discussing the be- to a larger uncertainty in the time it measures haviour of clocks. This underlies Einstein's develop- — a consequence of the unavoidable entangle- ment of special relativity [7], the prototypical exam- ment between the clock time and its center- ple of operationalism [8]. In a quantum setting, the of-mass degrees of freedom. We demonstrate clocks must of course be quantised, leading naturally how this lost precision can be recovered by per- to a time operator. This operational approach has forming a measurement of the clock’s state of revealed fundamental limitations to time-keeping in motion alongside its time reading. non-relativistic quantum systems [6,9{11], and novel effects in a variety of relativistic settings [12{16]. The present work concerns slowly-moving generic 1 Introduction quantum clocks embedded in a weakly-curved space- time. We are interested in the phenomenon of time di- One of the most important programs in theoretical lation, and how quantizing the clock may result in pre- physics is the pursuit of a successful theory unify- dictions distinct from those of general relativity alone. ing quantum mechanics and general relativity. Ar- We take the operational viewpoint noted above, asso- guably, many of the difficulties arising in this pursuit ciating time with the outcomes of measurements per- stem from a lack of understanding of the nature of arXiv:1904.02178v4 [quant-ph] 12 Aug 2020 formed on generic quantum clocks. In this setting, in time [1{3], particularly the conflict between how it contrast with the study of clocks in non-relativistic is conceived in the two theories [4]. For example, in quantum mechanics, we must consider the position general relativity a given object's proper time is de- and momentum of the clock. Quantum theory dic- fined geometrically according to that object's world tates that it be subject to some degree of spatial de- line, but according to quantum mechanics such well- localisation in addition to its \temporal delocalisa- defined trajectories are impossible. How do we then tion" (i.e. the indeterminacy of its time-reading), as assign a proper time to the delocalised objects de- depicted in Fig.1. scribed by quantum theory? Relativistic effects manifest in this quantum set- Confusion over the nature of time is not limited ting via a coupling between the clock's kinematic and to the context of quantum gravity. Indeed, even in internal (in our case, time-measuring) degrees of free- non-relativistic quantum mechanics, there is much dom. The form of this coupling has been derived in a Accepted in Quantum 2020-08-07, click title to verify. Published under CC-BY 4.0. 1 curately. We associate the relevant degree of free- dom with a Hilbert space Hc, and consider an ini- tial clock state ρc(0) which evolves according to the ˆ Schr¨odingerequation, with Hamiltonian Hc. We use the term laboratory time to refer to the parame- ter appearing in the Schr¨odingerequation. At lab- oratory time t, a measurement is performed, which corresponds to a Positive-Operator Valued Measure (POVM) {Fˆ(s)}s∈ S with S ⊆ R. We refer to the outcome s of this measurement as the clock time. A quantum clock is then defined by the ˆ ˆ Figure 1: Depiction of a spatially-delocalised quantum clock tuple {F (s)}s∈ S , Hc, ρc(0) . In this article how- ˆ ˆ exibiting temporal indeterminacy. In the theory of relativity, ever, it suffices to consider Tc, Hc, ρc(0) , where the time measured by a clock is defined geometrically by in- ˆ R ˆ Tc := S s F (s)ds is the first-moment operator of the tegrating along a well-defined spacetime path, and the clock POVM, which determines the expected value of the may be arbitrarily precise and accurate. This contrasts with measurement. In the case where the POVM is a time in quantum mechanics, where a fully quantum treat- projection-valued measure (in other words, where the ment requires clocks to be delocalised in space and experience clock times are perfectly distinguishable) the defini- an indeterminacy in their time. They cannot be meaningfully ˆ assigned a single trajectory. Relativity dynamically couples tion of Tc above is simply the spectral decomposition the temporal and kinematic quantum degrees of freedom, of the self-adjoint operator corresponding to the mea- resulting in time measurements which are influenced by the surement. For simplicity, we choose the laboratory ˆ delocalised spatial trajectory. time t to be such that hTci(0) = 0. If a quantum clock satisfies the Heisenberg form of ˆ ˆ 1 the canonical commutation relation, Tc, Hc = i 1c, number of different ways: from the relativistic disper- the mean clock time will exactly follow the labo- ˆ sion relation and mass-energy equivalence [17], from ratory time, i.e. hTci(t) = t mod T0 ∀t, for some the Klein-Gordon equation in curved spacetime [18] (possibly infinite) clock period T0 > 0. Further- (or its corresponding Lagrangian density [16]), and more, the standard deviation of such clocks is con- as a consequence of classical time dilation between stant and determined by the initial state which can the clock and the laboratory frame of reference [19]. be arbitrarily small. We refer to such a clock as ide- It has been used to predict a relativistically-induced alised. If one demands only this commutation rela- decoherence effect [20], and a corresponding reduc- tion, one can construct an idealised clock on a dense tion in the visibility of quantum interference experi- subset of the Hilbert space, with finite period T0 and ˆ ments [19]. This approach treats spacetime classically, with Hc bounded below (e.g. the phase operators making no reference to a quantum theory of gravity. in [21]). If we further impose canonical commuta- It is applicable only in the low-energy, weak-gravity tion relations of the Weyl form, and consider mea- limit, so that we may consider relativistic effects as surements corresponding to projection-valued mea- ˆ perturbative corrections to non-relativistic quantum sures, we necessarily have that Hc is unbounded below mechanics. (Pauli's theorem [5, 22]), which is clearly unphysical, We begin by introducing a way of characterising and T0 = ∞. These are both examples of covariant the accuracy of a generic quantum clock, before de- POVMs [9, 23], i.e. those satisfying the covariance ˆ ˆ scribing how to incorporate the phenomenon of time property Fˆ(s) = e−isHc Fˆ(0)eisHc , s ∈ R; where in dilation into quantum dynamics. This is followed by the case that S is bounded, Fˆ(s) has been period- a description of the average time dilation experienced ically extended to R. Furthermore, they satisfy the by a quantum clock for two different states of mo- canonical commutator relation of the Weyl form when tion. We then discuss how the incorporation of rel- S is unbounded, and of the Heisenberg form if ρc(0) ativity increases the uncertainty associated with the and Fˆ(0) have disjoint support (see AppendixC for measurement of time, and how this can be mitigated proof). by gaining knowledge of the clock's location/motion, To derive results that apply universally to all quan- illustrating this with a numerical example. We finish tum clocks, regardless of whether they exhibit the with a discussion of our results and the questions that idealised behaviour discussed above, we first quan- arise from them. tify the extent to which a given clock deviates from an idealised one. To this end, we introduce a clock's 2 Non-Relativistic Quantum Clocks error operator Eˆ(t); for any clock characterised by 1Here and throughout this article, we use units such that Before we discuss relativistic effects, it is conve- ~ = 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Information and Entropy in Quantum Theory
    Information and Entropy in Quantum Theory O J E Maroney Ph.D. Thesis Birkbeck College University of London Malet Street London WC1E 7HX arXiv:quant-ph/0411172v1 23 Nov 2004 Abstract Recent developments in quantum computing have revived interest in the notion of information as a foundational principle in physics. It has been suggested that information provides a means of interpreting quantum theory and a means of understanding the role of entropy in thermodynam- ics. The thesis presents a critical examination of these ideas, and contrasts the use of Shannon information with the concept of ’active information’ introduced by Bohm and Hiley. We look at certain thought experiments based upon the ’delayed choice’ and ’quantum eraser’ interference experiments, which present a complementarity between information gathered from a quantum measurement and interference effects. It has been argued that these experiments show the Bohm interpretation of quantum theory is untenable. We demonstrate that these experiments depend critically upon the assumption that a quantum optics device can operate as a measuring device, and show that, in the context of these experiments, it cannot be consistently understood in this way. By contrast, we then show how the notion of ’active information’ in the Bohm interpretation provides a coherent explanation of the phenomena shown in these experiments. We then examine the relationship between information and entropy. The thought experiment connecting these two quantities is the Szilard Engine version of Maxwell’s Demon, and it has been suggested that quantum measurement plays a key role in this. We provide the first complete description of the operation of the Szilard Engine as a quantum system.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematical Languages Shape Our Understanding of Time in Physics Physics Is Formulated in Terms of Timeless, Axiomatic Mathematics
    comment Corrected: Publisher Correction Mathematical languages shape our understanding of time in physics Physics is formulated in terms of timeless, axiomatic mathematics. A formulation on the basis of intuitionist mathematics, built on time-evolving processes, would ofer a perspective that is closer to our experience of physical reality. Nicolas Gisin n 1922 Albert Einstein, the physicist, met in Paris Henri Bergson, the philosopher. IThe two giants debated publicly about time and Einstein concluded with his famous statement: “There is no such thing as the time of the philosopher”. Around the same time, and equally dramatically, mathematicians were debating how to describe the continuum (Fig. 1). The famous German mathematician David Hilbert was promoting formalized mathematics, in which every real number with its infinite series of digits is a completed individual object. On the other side the Dutch mathematician, Luitzen Egbertus Jan Brouwer, was defending the view that each point on the line should be represented as a never-ending process that develops in time, a view known as intuitionistic mathematics (Box 1). Although Brouwer was backed-up by a few well-known figures, like Hermann Weyl 1 and Kurt Gödel2, Hilbert and his supporters clearly won that second debate. Hence, time was expulsed from mathematics and mathematical objects Fig. 1 | Debating mathematicians. David Hilbert (left), supporter of axiomatic mathematics. L. E. J. came to be seen as existing in some Brouwer (right), proposer of intuitionist mathematics. Credit: Left: INTERFOTO / Alamy Stock Photo; idealized Platonistic world. right: reprinted with permission from ref. 18, Springer These two debates had a huge impact on physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Theory of Quantum Clock
    NOTES ON THE THEORY OF QUANTUM CLOCK I.Tralle1, J.-P. Pellonp¨a¨a2 1Institute of Physics, University of Rzesz´ow,Rzesz´ow,Poland e-mail:[email protected] 2Department of Physics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland e-mail:juhpello@utu.fi (Received 11 March 2005; accepted 21 April 2005) Abstract In this paper we argue that the notion of time, whatever complicated and difficult to define as the philosophical cat- egory, from physicist’s point of view is nothing else but the sum of ’lapses of time’ measured by a proper clock. As far as Quantum Mechanics is concerned, we distinguish a special class of clocks, the ’atomic clocks’. It is because at atomic and subatomic level there is no other possibility to construct a ’unit of time’ or ’instant of time’ as to use the quantum transitions between chosen quantum states of a quantum ob- ject such as atoms, atomic nuclei and so on, to imitate the periodic circular motion of a clock hand over the dial. The clock synchronization problem is also discussed in the paper. We study the problem of defining a time difference observable for two-mode oscillator system. We assume that the time dif- ference obsevable is the difference of two single-mode covariant Concepts of Physics, Vol. II (2005) 113 time observables which are represented as a time shift covari- ant normalized positive operator measures. The difficulty of finding the correct value space and normalization for time dif- ference is discussed. 114 Concepts of Physics, Vol. II (2005) Notes on the Theory of Quantum Clock And the heaven departed as a scroll when it is rolled together;..
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Ultrafast Quantum Frequency Conversion
    Engineering ultrafast quantum frequency conversion Der Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Paderborn zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades Dr. rer. nat. vorgelegt von BENJAMIN BRECHT aus Nürnberg To Olga for Love and Support Contents 1 Summary1 2 Zusammenfassung3 3 A brief history of ultrafast quantum optics5 3.1 1900 – 1950 ................................... 5 3.2 1950 – 2000 ................................... 6 3.3 2000 – today .................................. 8 4 Fundamental theory 11 4.1 Waveguides .................................. 11 4.1.1 Waveguide modelling ........................ 12 4.1.2 Spatial mode considerations .................... 14 4.2 Light-matter interaction ........................... 16 4.2.1 Nonlinear polarisation ........................ 16 4.2.2 Three-wave mixing .......................... 17 4.2.3 More on phasematching ...................... 18 4.3 Ultrafast pulses ................................. 21 4.3.1 Time-bandwidth product ...................... 22 4.3.2 Chronocyclic Wigner function ................... 22 4.3.3 Pulse shaping ............................. 25 5 From classical to quantum optics 27 5.1 Speaking quantum .............................. 27 iii 5.1.1 Field quantisation in waveguides ................. 28 5.1.2 Quantum three-wave mixing .................... 30 5.1.3 Time-frequency representation .................. 32 5.1.3.1 Joint spectral amplitude functions ........... 32 5.1.3.2 Schmidt decomposition ................. 35 5.2 Understanding quantum ........................... 36 5.2.1 Parametric
    [Show full text]
  • HYPOTHESIS: How Defining Nature of Time Might Explain Some of Actual Physics Enigmas P Letizia
    HYPOTHESIS: How Defining Nature of Time Might Explain Some of Actual Physics Enigmas P Letizia To cite this version: P Letizia. HYPOTHESIS: How Defining Nature of Time Might Explain Some of Actual Physics Enigmas: A possible explanation of Dark Energy. 2017. hal-01424099 HAL Id: hal-01424099 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01424099 Preprint submitted on 3 Jan 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike| 4.0 International License SUBMITTED FOR STUDY January 1st, 2017 HYPOTHESIS: How Defining Nature of Time Might Explain Some of Actual Physics Enigmas P. Letizia Abstract Nowadays it seems that understanding the Nature of Time is not more a priority. It seems commonly admitted that Time can not be clearly nor objectively defined. I do not agree with this vision. I am among those who think that Time has an objective reality in Physics. If it has a reality, then it must be understood. My first ambition with this paper was to submit for study a proposition concerning the Nature of Time. However, once defined I understood that this proposition embeds an underlying logic.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Theory of Quantum Clock
    NOTES ON THE THEORY OF QUANTUM CLOCK I.Tralle1, J.-P. Pellonp¨a¨a2 1Institute of Physics, University of Rzesz´ow,Rzesz´ow,Poland e-mail:[email protected] 2Department of Physics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland e-mail:juhpello@utu.fi (Received 11 March 2005; accepted 21 April 2005) Abstract In this paper we argue that the notion of time, whatever complicated and difficult to define as the philosophical cat- egory, from physicist’s point of view is nothing else but the sum of ’lapses of time’ measured by a proper clock. As far as Quantum Mechanics is concerned, we distinguish a special class of clocks, the ’atomic clocks’. It is because at atomic and subatomic level there is no other possibility to construct a ’unit of time’ or ’instant of time’ as to use the quantum transitions between chosen quantum states of a quantum ob- ject such as atoms, atomic nuclei and so on, to imitate the periodic circular motion of a clock hand over the dial. The clock synchronization problem is also discussed in the paper. We study the problem of defining a time difference observable for two-mode oscillator system. We assume that the time dif- ference obsevable is the difference of two single-mode covariant Concepts of Physics, Vol. II (2005) 113 time observables which are represented as a time shift covari- ant normalized positive operator measures. The difficulty of finding the correct value space and normalization for time dif- ference is discussed. 114 Concepts of Physics, Vol. II (2005) Notes on the Theory of Quantum Clock And the heaven departed as a scroll when it is rolled together;..
    [Show full text]
  • The Boundaries of Nature: Special & General Relativity and Quantum
    “The Boundaries of Nature: Special & General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, A Second Course in Physics” Edwin F. Taylor's acceptance speech for the 1998 Oersted medal presented by the American Association of Physics Teachers, 6 January 1998 Edwin F. Taylor Center for Innovation in Learning, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (Now at 22 Hopkins Road, Arlington, MA 02476-8109, email [email protected] , web http://www.artsaxis.com/eftaylor/ ) ABSTRACT Public hunger for relativity and quantum mechanics is insatiable, and we should use it selectively but shamelessly to attract students, most of whom will not become physics majors, but all of whom can experience "deep physics." Science, engineering, and mathematics students, indeed anyone comfortable with calculus, can now delve deeply into special and general relativity and quantum mechanics. Big chunks of general relativity require only calculus if one starts with the metric describing spacetime around Earth or black hole. Expressions for energy and angular momentum follow, along with orbit predictions for particles and light. Feynman's Sum Over Paths quantum theory simply commands the electron: Explore all paths. Students can model this command with the computer, pointing and clicking to tell the electron which paths to explore; wave functions and bound states arise naturally. A second full year course in physics covering special relativity, general relativity, and quantum mechanics would have wide appeal -- and might also lead to significant advancements in upper-level courses for the physics major. © 1998 American Association of Physics Teachers INTRODUCTION It is easy to feel intimidated by those who have in the past received the Oersted Medal, especially those with whom I have worked closely in the enterprise of physics teaching: Edward M.
    [Show full text]
  • Terminology of Geological Time: Establishment of a Community Standard
    Terminology of geological time: Establishment of a community standard Marie-Pierre Aubry1, John A. Van Couvering2, Nicholas Christie-Blick3, Ed Landing4, Brian R. Pratt5, Donald E. Owen6 and Ismael Ferrusquía-Villafranca7 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway NJ 08854, USA; email: [email protected] 2Micropaleontology Press, New York, NY 10001, USA email: [email protected] 3Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences and Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades NY 10964, USA email: [email protected] 4New York State Museum, Madison Avenue, Albany NY 12230, USA email: [email protected] 5Department of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon SK7N 5E2, Canada; email: [email protected] 6Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Lamar University, Beaumont TX 77710 USA email: [email protected] 7Universidad Nacional Autónomo de México, Instituto de Geologia, México DF email: [email protected] ABSTRACT: It has been recommended that geological time be described in a single set of terms and according to metric or SI (“Système International d’Unités”) standards, to ensure “worldwide unification of measurement”. While any effort to improve communication in sci- entific research and writing is to be encouraged, we are also concerned that fundamental differences between date and duration, in the way that our profession expresses geological time, would be lost in such an oversimplified terminology. In addition, no precise value for ‘year’ in the SI base unit of second has been accepted by the international bodies. Under any circumstances, however, it remains the fact that geologi- cal dates – as points in time – are not relevant to the SI.
    [Show full text]
  • Time and Frequency Division Report
    Time and Frequency Division Goal The broad mission of the Time and Frequency Division is to provide official U.S. time and related quantities to support a wide range of uses in industry, national infrastructure, research, and among the general public. DIVISION STRATEGY The division’s research and metrology ac- tivities comprise three vertically integrated components, each of which constitutes a strategic element: 1. Official time: Accurate and precise realization of official U.S. time (UTC) and frequency. 2. Dissemination: A wide range of mea- surement services to efficiently and effectively distribute U.S. time and frequency and related quantities – pri- marily through free broadcast services available to any user 24/7/365. 3. Research: Research and technolo- gy development to improve time and frequency standards and dissemination. Part of this research includes high-impact programs in areas such as quantum information processing, atom-based sensors, and laser development and applications, which evolved directly from research to make better frequency standards (atomic clocks). Overview These three components – official time, dissemination, and research – are closely integrated. For example, all Division dissemination services tie directly to the Division’s realization of official time (UTC), and much of the Division’s research is enabled by the continual availability of precision UTC. Our modern technology and economy depend critically on the broad availability of precision timing, frequency, and synchronization. NIST realization and dissemination of time and frequency – continually improved by NIST research and development – is a crucial part of a series of informal national timing infrastructures that enable such essential technologies as: • Telecommunications and computer networks • Utility distribution • GPS, widely available in every cell phone and smartphone as well as GPS receivers • Electronic financial transactions 1 • National security and intelligence applications • Research Strategic Goal: Official Time Intended Outcome and Background U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Measure of Change Brittany A
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations Spring 2019 Time: A Measure of Change Brittany A. Gentry Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Gentry, B. A.(2019). Time: A Measure of Change. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/5247 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Time: A Measure of Change By Brittany A. Gentry Bachelor of Arts Houghton College, 2009 ________________________________________________ Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2019 Accepted by Michael Dickson, Major Professor Leah McClimans, Committee Member Thomas Burke, Committee Member Alexander Pruss, Committee Member Cheryl L. Addy, Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School ©Copyright by Brittany A. Gentry, 2019 All Rights Reserved ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank Michael Dickson, my dissertation advisor, for extensive comments on numerous drafts over the last several years and for his patience and encouragement throughout this process. I would also like to thank my other committee members, Leah McClimans, Thomas Burke, and Alexander Pruss, for their comments and recommendations along the way. Finally, I am grateful to fellow students and professors at the University of South Carolina, the audience at the International Society for the Philosophy of Time conference at Wake Forest University, NC, and anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on various drafts of portions of this dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Physics in Space
    Quantum Physics in Space Alessio Belenchiaa,b,∗∗, Matteo Carlessob,c,d,∗∗, Omer¨ Bayraktare,f, Daniele Dequalg, Ivan Derkachh, Giulio Gasbarrii,j, Waldemar Herrk,l, Ying Lia Lim, Markus Rademacherm, Jasminder Sidhun, Daniel KL Oin, Stephan T. Seidelo, Rainer Kaltenbaekp,q, Christoph Marquardte,f, Hendrik Ulbrichtj, Vladyslav C. Usenkoh, Lisa W¨ornerr,s, Andr´eXuerebt, Mauro Paternostrob, Angelo Bassic,d,∗ aInstitut f¨urTheoretische Physik, Eberhard-Karls-Universit¨atT¨ubingen, 72076 T¨ubingen,Germany bCentre for Theoretical Atomic,Molecular, and Optical Physics, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen's University, Belfast BT7 1NN, United Kingdom cDepartment of Physics,University of Trieste, Strada Costiera 11, 34151 Trieste,Italy dIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Trieste Section, Via Valerio 2, 34127 Trieste, Italy eMax Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Staudtstraße 2, 91058 Erlangen, Germany fInstitute of Optics, Information and Photonics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-N¨urnberg, Staudtstraße 7 B2, 91058 Erlangen, Germany gScientific Research Unit, Agenzia Spaziale Italiana, Matera, Italy hDepartment of Optics, Palacky University, 17. listopadu 50,772 07 Olomouc,Czech Republic iF´ısica Te`orica: Informaci´oi Fen`omensQu`antics,Department de F´ısica, Universitat Aut`onomade Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain jDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom kDeutsches Zentrum f¨urLuft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR), Institut f¨urSatellitengeod¨asieund
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Temporal Arrows in Space-Time Temporality
    Temporal Arrows in Space-Time Temporality (…) has nothing to do with mechanics. It has to do with statistical mechanics, thermodynamics (…).C. Rovelli, in Dieks, 2006, 35 Abstract The prevailing current of thought in both physics and philosophy is that relativistic space-time provides no means for the objective measurement of the passage of time. Kurt Gödel, for instance, denied the possibility of an objective lapse of time, both in the Special and the General theory of relativity. From this failure many writers have inferred that a static block universe is the only acceptable conceptual consequence of a four-dimensional world. The aim of this paper is to investigate how arrows of time could be measured objectively in space-time. In order to carry out this investigation it is proposed to consider both local and global arrows of time. In particular the investigation will focus on a) invariant thermodynamic parameters in both the Special and the General theory for local regions of space-time (passage of time); b) the evolution of the universe under appropriate boundary conditions for the whole of space-time (arrow of time), as envisaged in modern quantum cosmology. The upshot of this investigation is that a number of invariant physical indicators in space-time can be found, which would allow observers to measure the lapse of time and to infer both the existence of an objective passage and an arrow of time. Keywords Arrows of time; entropy; four-dimensional world; invariance; space-time; thermodynamics 1 I. Introduction Philosophical debates about the nature of space-time often centre on questions of its ontology, i.e.
    [Show full text]