The Fake News Age – Telling Health Fact Vs Fiction
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Welcome to the fake news age – telling health fact vs fiction @MHPHealth | #MakingPerfectSenseOfHealth 2 What can communicators do to help people tell health fact from fiction? FOREWORD KATE POGSON Head of Health, ENGINE MHP It is no secret that fake news has become an ‘expression du jour’. In healthcare, the consequences of misinformation or fake news can be incredibly serious. The ongoing noise and attention of anti-vax groups and their associated arguments has led the World Health Organisation to list ‘Vaccine Hesitancy’ as one of the world’s most significant public health threats. This is despite conclusive evidence to demonstrate the benefit of vaccinations on an individual’s health, as well as the broader population. So, what is going wrong? How do we as communicators counter misinformation and what can we learn from the increased interest in behavioural psychology approaches to evidence-base our communications? Welcome to our Fake News Panel – we are delighted to be joined by such a variety of media, behavioural and clinical experts to discuss why misinformation continues to proliferate and what we can do to try and get ahead of the curve. We are also pleased to share with you new research conducted by ENGINE MHP looking at what media sources the public trust most with information relating to their health, and also to present you with a new model, developed in collaboration with the Affective Brain Lab at University College London, looking at effective mechanisms for communications in this, the Networked Age. 1 PANELLIST BIOGRAPHIES DR CHRISTIAN JESSEN DR FIONA Mc MASTER Doctor and TV Presenter Behavioural Psychologist & Consultant, Innovia Technology Dr Christian Jessen is a popular health campaigner Dr Fiona McMaster is an innovation consultant who combines his medical career with a successful at Cambridge-based Innovia Technology, where media career. He works closely with various she specialises in projects that link innovation charities (including Terrence Higgins Trust, Ditch with behavioural science and healthcare. Prior the Label and Battersea Dogs & Cats Home) to to working at Innovia, Fiona was an academic, help raise awareness and make health accessible to designing and delivering public health courses and everyone. Dr Christian is well-known for presenting research projects in the UK, the USA, Singapore, Dr Christian Will See You Now and Dr Christian: China and Nigeria. Her health interests are diverse, 12 Hours to Cure Your Street along with the multi and projects she has worked on have included award-winning Embarrassing Bodies and Supersize interventions to reduce obesity in children in the vs Superskinny. He also presented the critically US to increasing medication compliance for HIV acclaimed documentaries Undercover Doctor: Cure patients in Nigeria. She regularly trains health Me I’m Gay, How the Rich Live Longer and co-hosted and social care practitioners in motivational Drugs Live and Stand Up to Cancer (Channel 4). interviewing, and is a member of the Motivational He writes regular health columns and is the author Interviewing Network of Trainers. of Dr Christian’s Guide to Growing Up Online, Dr Christian’s Guide to Growing Up, Dr Christian’s innoviatech.com Guide to the Tricky Stuff, Dr Christian’s Guide to @FionaMcMaster You, Can I Just Ask? and Supersize vs Superskinny. drchristianjessen.com @DoctorChristian 2 TOM CHIVERS KATE POGSON Former Telegraph Journalist Head of Health, ENGINE MHP Tom Chivers was BuzzFeed UK's science writer Kate brings over 10 years’ experience in between 2015 and 2018. Before joining BuzzFeed, pharmaceutical and healthcare communications, he spent seven years at the Telegraph, where he supporting clients across a broad range of once interviewed Terry Pratchett and was told he communications disciplines including public affairs was 'far too nice to be a journalist'. He has struggled and health policy, product communications, disease on despite this handicap, winning several awards awareness campaigns, market access programmes including a Statistical Excellence in Journalism and crisis management. award from the Royal Statistical Society and being shortlisted for Best Science Writer in the British Kate’s understanding of the pharmaceutical Journalism Awards 2017. and media landscape stem from a career at two leading healthcare public relations agencies @TomChivers and an academic background in biochemistry and molecular biology. Kate was awarded the Communiqué Healthcare Leader Award in 2018. @KateP82 ROB DAWSON Director of Communications, Advocacy & Support, Meningitis Research Foundation and Chair, Stempra Rob Dawson is a strategic communications director with expertise in health and science across industry, not-for-profit and public sector, currently working for the Meningitis Research Foundation. Rob is a Chartered Institute of Public Relations (CIPR) member and the Chair of the STEM PR Association. His awards include Third Sector Awards 2018, Communications Campaign of the Year for Meningitis Research Foundation’s adolescent vaccine campaign; Communiqué Awards 2007, Best Use of a Survey for GlaxoSmithKline’s HIV portfolio; Communiqué Awards 2005, Best Patient or Public Campaign for a social marketing campaign for Chelsea and Westminster Healthcare Trust. @bioscifan 3 PUBLIC POLLING ANALYSIS In the Networked Age, a huge The polling results demonstrated the majority receive health information from and trust the amount of data is processed, traditional sources: healthcare professionals and the NHS. However, social media and the news packaged and published in the media are becoming a more prominent source of media, both traditional and health information, but trust in these platforms is limited: seven in ten people agree they often hear online. But how often is this contradictory health advice through the media and information misinterpreted or struggle to know what to believe. misquoted? Are we living in an This presents a challenge for those who are responsible for producing a story: from the scientist era of misinformation? MHP in the laboratory, through their institution’s press commissioned public polling* office, to the journalist and their editor – to ensure that the story is clear, relevant and contextualised, to better understand where whilst also being interesting and ‘newsworthy’. the public go for health There is also a pressing need to equip the public with tools to increase health and media literacy, as two- misinformation and which thirds of those struggling to know what to believe sources are most trusted. rarely or never check that the health information they read is correct. Finally, our polling suggested that we also need to address the bigger picture, as an overwhelming majority (79%) of those polled saw the need for a call to action by social media platforms and the Government to regulate misinformation. This data has highlighted that there is a lot of work to be done to limit misinformation – how can we, as communication professionals, X help lead the change? 4 Fact or fiction 1 in 5 20% adults rank social media of people rarely or among their top three never check the places they get their health information health information they read is correct people (29%) 2 in 5 feel they are adults rank the media 3 more likely among the top three to believe a places they most often health story if it see or hear their health in 10 is shared by a information friend on their social channels Half of UK adults put family and friends among their top three most trusted sources of health information – third after healthcare professionals (83%) and the NHS (72%) * ComRes interviewed 2,041 British adults on behalf of MHP, aged 18+ online between 15-16 May 2019. Data were weighted to be representative of British adults aged 18+ by key demographics including age, gender, region and social grade. 5 THE ROLE OF THE COMMUNICATOR The first point is that fake news is not intrinsically new. The propensity for individuals to listen and act upon information which is unfounded is a historic one. But at the heart of how we process information are several psychological principles which KATE POGSON communicators need to better understand. Head of Health, ENGINE MHP • We are influenced by people like ourselves: ideas and behaviours are transmitted through networks and we are more likely to listen to So, what is the role of the ‘experts’ who share our own values. ‘Similarity’ very much trumps ‘accuracy’ when it comes communicator in ensuring to the people we listen to. One example of this accurate, evidence-based was a study from the group, Health Feedback, which analysed the pervasiveness of fake news reporting and understanding on Facebook and other social media. Of the ten most shared articles pertaining to health in of critical health topics? 2018 analysed by the research, seven contained misleading or false information • We are biased towards the social norm: telling people that 65 per cent of patients missed their GP appointment in that quarter is not going to spur the audience into being good future citizens, they are more likely to think ‘well, I won’t try hard if everyone is doing it’! • We suffer from confirmation bias and strongly prefer news we agree with: even worse, we tend to overlook evidence which contradicts with what we already think is true! (she says, frantically Googling studies to tell me that Sauvignon Blanc actually has a net health benefit) 6 So, while the appetite and impact of fake news isn’t new, the rise of social and digital platforms What can we do about it? How can we best has allowed this intrinsic behaviour to be amplified. balance fake news, especially in healthcare, so Namely: that patients have ready access to accurate information to support healthy decision making? • Digital algorithms serve up content you have already engaged with and prioritises influencers • Think messenger over message. Yes, I’m over content sure your primary investigator on the phase III product trial is world-renowned, but they • Search makes it easier to ‘prove’ things we already may not resonate with the non-specialist believe and ignore contradictory evidence clinical or patient audience you want to • Like buttons and other digital voting tools make reach.