DOCSLIB.ORG

Global Forum for Health Research, 1999

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Global Forum for Health Research, 1999 The 10/90 Report on Health Research 1999 Overview of the Global Forum Priorities in Health Research Analytical Work for Priority Setting Poverty and Health Partnership Initiatives in Health Research Capacity Development Communication to Help Bridge the 10/90 Gap Practical Framework for Setting Priorities Fo u n d a tion Council Se c re t a ri a t Adetokunbo O. Lucas Louis J. Curra t H a rv a rd School of Public Health Executive Secret a r y Ch a i r p e r s o n Thomas C. Nchinda Rashidah Abdullah Senior Public Health Specialist Asian-Pacific Resources and An d r es de Francisco Re s e a r ch Center for Wom e n Public Health Specialist Ha r vey Bale Elizabeth Carey - B u m g a rn e r In t e r national Federation of Senior Communication Offi c e r Ph a r maceutical Manufacturer s Diane Keithly As s o c i a t i o n s Administrative Offi c e r Ma r tine Berge r Kirsten Bendixen Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation Administrative Assistant Rolf Carlman Jane Abel Swedish International Development Administrative Assistant Cooperation Agency Adnan A. Hyder Tim Evans Co n s u l t a n t Rockefeller Foundation Theodor M. Fliedner WHO Advisory Committee on Health Research Julio Fren k Mexican Health Foundation Adrienne Germa i n In t e r national Wom e n ’ s Health Coalition Ma r y Ann Lansang College of Medicine University of the Philippines Ma u r een Law World Bank Si g r un Møgedal No r wegian Agency for Development Cooperation Carlos Morel Oswaldo Cruz Foundation Mi n i s t r y of Health of Brazil Pramilla Senanayake In t e r national Planned Pa r enthood Federation Charas Suwanwela College of Public Health Ch u l a l o n g k o r n University This report was prepared by the Secretariat of the Global Forum for Health Research (GFHR) on the basis of the presentations and discussions at Forum 2 held in June 1998 in Geneva, and on the work of GFHR during 1998. The Secretariat alone is responsible for the views expressed in this Report. The principal authors are: Chapter 1.............. Louis J. Currat Chapter 2.............. Adnan A. Hyder Chapter 3.............. Adnan A. Hyder Chapter 4.............. Adnan A. Hyder Chapter 5.............. Thomas C. Nchinda Chapter 6.............. Thomas C. Nchinda Chapter 7.............. Elizabeth Carey-Bumgarner Chapter 8.............. Louis J. Currat Editor:................... Sheila Davey Design:.................. Raphaël Michaluk Printing:................ AGLfm Production © Global Forum for Health Research, 1999 The reproduction of this document is regulated in accordance with the provisions of Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. All rights are reserved by the Global Forum for Health Research. The document may be freely reviewed, abstracted, reproduced or translated, in part or in whole, but not for sale or for use in conjunction with commercial purposes. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the Global Forum for Health Research concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Additional copies available from: Global Forum for Health Research c/o World Health Organization 20, Avenue Appia 1211 Geneva 27 Switzerland Manufactured in Switzerland First printing: March, 1999 Louis J. Currat Adetokunbo O. Lucas Executive Secretary Chairperson Global Forum for Health Research Global Forum for Health Research Preface Investment in health research and develop- The many institutions that fund health ment by the public and private sectors amounts re s e a rch could help improve both global to about US$ 56 billion a year. Most of this – a health and their own effectiveness if they were staggering 90% – is spent on research into to exchange information, link their efforts, health problems that concern only 10% of the and base their decisions about re s o u rc e world’s population. As a result, only 10% of allocation on explicit analysis of priorities. the limited funds available for health research is currently used to help improve the health The need for global prioritization in health of 90% of the world’s population. This grave research was raised in the 1990 Report of disparity is widely referred to as the 10/90 the Commission on Health Research for Disequilibrium. Development, Health Research: Essential Link to Equity in Development. This led to the creation To make matters worse, there is duplication in 1994 of the Ad Hoc Committee on Health in some areas of health re s e a rch, major R e s e a rch Relating to Future Interv e n t i o n gaps elsewhere, dispersal of efforts, and an Options,1 under the auspices of the World a l a rming lack of information on re so urc e Health Organization (WHO) and with the flows. participation of a wide range of institutions, 1 Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Health Research, Investing in Health Research and Development, WHO, September 1996 (Referred to henceforth as "Report of the Ad Hoc Committee"). to reflect its broad mandate. The Committee at the Headquarters of the World Health presented its findings in Geneva on 27-29 Organization in Geneva, started its operations June 1996 at a meeting which bro u g h t in January 1998. together re s e a rchers, government off i c i a l s , n o n - g o v e rnmental organizations (NGOs), During the first year, the Global Forum for and funders of research. The Committee’s Health Research concentrated its activities on major conclusions were that, over the coming the following strategies: decades, the world community would continue to be faced by four major challenges:2 • O rganization of the Second Annual Forum: Forum 2 was held in Geneva on • The huge and unnecessary burden of 25-26 June 1998. The agenda is presented infectious diseases among the poor that can in Annex 1. be addressed with existing cost-effective • Analytical Work for Priority Setting interventions (referred to as "the unfinished along the lines of the five-step process agenda"). for resource allocation developed by the • The continually changing nature of Ad Hoc Committee on Health Research: m i c robial threats, such as HIV/AIDS, (i) analysis of the burden of disease; tuberculosis, and malaria. (ii) analysis of the reasons why the disease • The epidemics of noncommunicable persists (analysis of the determ i n a n t s ) ; diseases and injuries in low- and middle- (iii) analysis of the current state of income countries, such as heart disease, knowledge; (iv) estimation of the cost- n e u ro-psychiatric conditions, violence, effectiveness of present and future inter- and road traffic accidents. ventions; and (v) analysis of resource flows • The great disparity in how efficiently and into health research, disease by disease. equitably different health systems provide • Launching new initiatives: the magnitude services. of many health problems is beyond the capacity of any single institution and Participants at the meeting endorsed the main re q u i res a concerted eff o rt involving a findings of the Report and, in particular, the broad partnership. By acting together, the recommendation for the creation of a Global probability of finding solutions adapted to Forum for Health Research to mobilize forces the magnitude of the challenges increases to help correct the 10/90 Disequilibrium. considerably. A number of initiatives were directly supported by the Forum in 1998 The first Annual Forum (June 1997) launched in the areas of health policies, malaria, the Global Forum for Health Research as an tuberculosis, cardiovascular diseases, and independent entity and established a Steering domestic violence. Committee of 16 members re p re s e n t i n g • Communication and information: government policy-makers, multilateral and intensive eff o rts were made to develop bilateral development agencies, foundations, appropriate communication tools for the i n t e rnational NGOs, women's associations, Fo r um, including a website, media contacts, research institutions, and the private sector. and publication of the first 10/90 Report The Secretariat of the Global Forum, located on Health Research. 2 The recommendations of the Ad Hoc Committee to deal with these challenges appear in Chapter 1, Section 2 of the present Report. The objective of this report is to present the people to those benefiting the large majority. results of Forum 2 in the broader context of In view of the magnitude of the problems the 10/90 Disequilibrium. It will attempt to to be solved, there is a need to mobilize put each of the issues in context, summarize thousands of institutions. In this era of the perspectives offered at Forum 2, and globalization, it is necessary to pro p e l outline the plan of action for the coming research on the health problems of the poor years. It is the first such report. The road to onto the global health agenda. It is unrealistic help correct the 10/90 Disequilibrium will to contemplate a future in which the clearly be a long one, but it is also clear that developing world will grow healthier and it will lead to better health for the majority wealthier, while the poor everywhere remain of the world community. This will be made marginalized by ill-health and poverty. The possible by a reallocation, by decision-makers silent spread of drug-resistant microbes is in the South as well as in the North, of health evidence enough that no country can afford research funds from lower to higher priority to ignore international health concern s .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Trends and Inequalities in Young Child Nutrition in Rwanda [FA109]
    Trends and Inequalities in Young Child Nutrition in Rwanda Further Analysis of the 2014-15 Demographic and Health Survey DHS Further Analysis Reports No. 109 Republic of Rwanda Trends and Inequalities in Young Child Nutrition in Rwanda: Further Analysis of the 2014-15 Demographic and Health Survey DHS Further Analysis Reports No. 109 Jennifer Yourkavitch ICF Rockville, Maryland, USA January 2018 Corresponding author: Jennifer Yourkavitch, International Health and Development, ICF International, 530 Gaither Road, Suite 500, Rockville, MD 20850, USA; phone: +1 301-407-6500; fax: +1 301-407-6501; email: [email protected] Acknowledgment: The author would like to thank Shireen Assaf and Tom Pullum for advice and feedback on data analysis, Rukundo Benedict and Sorrel Namaste for technical input, and Chris Gramer for assistance with the dashboards. Editor: Bryant Robey Document Production: Joan Wardell This report presents findings from a further analysis undertaken as part of the follow-up to the 2014-15 Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey (RDHS). ICF provided technical assistance for the project. This report is a publication of The DHS Program, which is designed to collect, analyze, and disseminate data on fertility, family planning, maternal and child health, nutrition, and HIV/AIDS. Funding was provided by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) through the DHS Program (#AID-OAA-C-13-00095). The opinions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID and other cooperating agencies. The Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey 2014-15 (2014-15 RDHS) was implemented by the National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (NISR) from November 9, 2014, to April 8, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing Risk Inequality Metrics in Tuberculosis Policy Development M.Gabriela M.Gomes, Juliane F
    Introducing risk inequality metrics in tuberculosis policy development M.Gabriela M.Gomes, Juliane F. Oliveira, Adelmo Bertolde, Diepreye Ayabina, Tuan Anh Nguyen, Ethel Leonor Noia Maciel, Raquel Duarte, Binh Hoa Nguyen, Priya B Shete, Christian Lienhardt To cite this version: M.Gabriela M.Gomes, Juliane F. Oliveira, Adelmo Bertolde, Diepreye Ayabina, Tuan Anh Nguyen, et al.. Introducing risk inequality metrics in tuberculosis policy development. Nature Communications, Nature Publishing Group, 2019, 10, pp.2480. 10.1038/s41467-019-10447-y. hal-02474655 HAL Id: hal-02474655 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02474655 Submitted on 11 Feb 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10447-y OPEN Introducing risk inequality metrics in tuberculosis policy development M. Gabriela M. Gomes 1,2, Juliane F. Oliveira 2, Adelmo Bertolde3, Diepreye Ayabina1, Tuan Anh Nguyen4, Ethel L. Maciel5, Raquel Duarte6, Binh Hoa Nguyen4, Priya B. Shete7 & Christian Lienhardt8,9 Global stakeholders including the World Health Organization rely on predictive models for developing strategies and setting targets for tuberculosis care and control programs. Failure 1234567890():,; to account for variation in individual risk leads to substantial biases that impair data inter- pretation and policy decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Food and Health in Europe: Europe: in Health and Food WHO Regional Publications
    Food and health in Europe: Food and health WHO Regional Publications European Series, No. 96 a new basis for action Food and health in Europe: a new basis for action 96 The World Health Organization was established in 1948 as a specialized agency of the United Nations serving as the directing and coordinating authority for international health matters and public health. One of WHO’s constitutional functions is to provide objective and reliable information and advice in the field of human health, a responsibility that it fulfils in part through its publications programmes. Through its publications, the Organization seeks to support national health strategies and address the most pressing public health concerns. The WHO Regional Office for Europe is one of six regional offices throughout the world, each with its own programme geared to the particular health problems of the countries it serves. The European Region embraces some 870 million people living in an area stretching from Greenland in the north and the Mediterranean in the south to the Pacific shores of the Russian Federation. The European programme of WHO therefore concentrates both on the problems associated with industrial and post-industrial society and on those faced by the emerging democracies of central and eastern Europe and the former USSR. To ensure the widest possible availability of authoritative information and guidance on health matters, WHO secures broad international distribution of its publications and encourages their translation and adaptation. By helping to promote and protect health and prevent and control disease, WHO’s books contribute to achieving the Organization’s principal objective – the attainment by all people of the highest possible level of health.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Abstract Book
    DEEPER INSIGHT FROM BIG DATA AND SMALL AREAS PORTO | PORTUGAL | 07 - 09 SEPTEMBER 2017 Table 3 Organisation of Contents 4 Venue 5 Social Programme 7 Extra Social Programme 9 Informations 11 Pre-Conference Workshops 11 Modelling spatial and spatio-temporal areal unit data in R with CARBayes 12 Health Applications of Google Earth Engine 13 Scientific Programme 25 Invited Speakers | Short Biographies 85 Plenary Sessions 85 Plenary Session I 87 Plenary Session II 89 Plenary Session III 93 Oral Communications 93 Parallel Session 1 | GIS In Public Health I 103 Parallel Session 2 | Spatial Health Surveillance I 111 Parallel Session 3 | Spatial Health Surveillance II 121 Parallel Session 4 | Spatial Survival And Registry Data Analysis I 127 Parallel Session 5 | Spatial Survival And Registry Data Analysis II 135 Parallel Session 6 | Clustering Of Temporal Trends In Space-Time Disease Mapping 143 Parallel Session 7 | Data Science Applied To Health: Strategies And Tools For Big Data, Machine Learning And Data Mining 151 Parallel Session 8 | Modifiable Areal Unit Issues And Methods 159 Parallel Session 9 | Social Networks And Spatial Epidemiology: Tools, Opportunities And Challenges 167 Parallel Session 10 | Modelling Climate-Sensitive Disease I 173 Parallel Session 11 | Modelling Climate-Sensitive Disease II 183 Parallel Session 12 | Agent-Based Modelling Table of Contents 189 Parallel Session 13 | GIS In Public Health II 203 Parallel Session 14 | Modelling And Inference In Infectious Disease Epidemiology 211 Parallel Session 15 | The Use Of Linked
    [Show full text]
  • Compounding Health Risks and Increased Vulnerability to SARS-Cov-2 for Racial and Ethnic Minorities and Low Socioeconomic Status Individuals in the United States
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 15 April 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202004.0234.v1 Compounding Health Risks and Increased Vulnerability to SARS-CoV-2 for Racial and Ethnic Minorities and Low Socioeconomic Status Individuals in the United States Elise M. Myers1 [email protected] 1Columbia University; 535 W 116th Street, New York, NY 10027 Abstract Recent clinical SARS-CoV-2 studies link diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and hypertension to increased disease severity. In the US, racial and ethnic minorities and low socioeconomic status (SES) individuals are more likely to have increased rates of these comorbidities, lower baseline health, limited access to care, increased perceived discrimination, and limited resources, all of which increase their vulnerability to severe disease and poor health outcomes from SARS-CoV- 2. Previous studies demonstrated the disproportionate impact of pandemic and seasonal influenza on these populations, due to these risk factors. This paper reviews increased health risks and documented health disparities of racial and ethnic minorities and low SES individuals in the US. Pandemic response must prioritize these marginalized communities to minimize the negative, disproportionate impacts of SARS-CoV-2 on them and manage spread throughout the entire population. This paper concludes with recommendations applicable to healthcare facilities and public officials at various government levels. Keywords: Coronavirus, COVID-19, comorbidity, race and ethnicity, health disparities Introduction The novel human coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19), was declared a pandemic by the WHO on March 11, 20201. Since the January 15th arrival of the first documented case in the United States, the disease has been rapidly spreading through the country, reaching every state and the District of Columbia (DC) by March 17th.
    [Show full text]
  • Health for All? in Recent Years, a Considerable Number of Countries Have Developed and Implemented Strategies Aiming at Reducing Inequalities in Health
    Health for all? In recent years, a considerable number of countries have developed and implemented strategies aiming at reducing inequalities in health. However, knowledge of effective policies or strategies to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in health is still very fragmented. The aim of this book is to describe and compare different European health equity strategies and their potential successes. The main part of the material comes from a comparative study of national public health strategies for equity in health with the following participating countries: Denmark, Finland, England, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Spain and Sweden. National experts wrote the country chapters which not only cover questions concerning whether their countries were taking measures on the individual public health problems – such as smoking, alcohol or physical activity – but also if the policies had considered the wider, social determinants of health and experiences of the potential implementation processes. This publication presents an up-to-date picture concerning equity- oriented public health policies in Europe. However, there is considerable lack of relevant data to enable comprehensive comparisons and analyses of successes and problems with the implementation and monitoring of health equity policies. We hope the book will stimulate continued efforts to harmonise relevant data collections and improve collaborative analyses aiming at shaping an evidence base for policy decisions about the most effective ways to promote equity in health. Health for all?
    [Show full text]
  • The Accuracy of Self-Report Versus Objective Assessment for Estimating Socioeconomic Inequalities in Disease Prevalence in Indonesia
    International Journal of Public Health (2019) 64:1233–1241 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-019-01301-5 (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,- volV) ORIGINAL ARTICLE The accuracy of self-report versus objective assessment for estimating socioeconomic inequalities in disease prevalence in Indonesia 1,2 2 2 Joko Mulyanto • Dionne S. Kringos • Anton E. Kunst Received: 29 March 2019 / Revised: 11 September 2019 / Accepted: 11 September 2019 / Published online: 17 September 2019 Ó The Author(s) 2019 Abstract Objectives To estimate socioeconomic inequalities in hypertension and asthma prevalence in Indonesia, to compare estimates based on self-report (SR) to those based on objective assessment (OA), and to assess the role of sensitivity and specificity of SR. Methods We used data from the 2014 Indonesia Family Life Survey (n = 34,257). We measured inequalities in hyper- tension and asthma prevalence in relation to educational level and income, using standardised prevalence rate and the relative index of inequality (RII). Using OA as standard, we calculated the sensitivity and specificity of SR. Results For hypertension, reversed inequalities were found when estimated by SR instead of OA (RII for education 0.86, 95% CI 0.74–0.99 vs. RII 1.29, 95% CI 1.16–1.44). For asthma, a similar but even larger reversal of inequalities was found. The sensitivity of SR was low overall, and especially for the lowest education or income group. Conclusions Results imply that the use of SR may lead to underestimation of socioeconomic inequalities in disease prevalence in a low-income country such as Indonesia. The use of OA is recommended for monitoring inequalities in non- communicable disease prevalence.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts
    Conformity, Dialogue and Deviance in Health and Medicine Society for the Social History of Medicine Conference 11-13 July 2018 University of Liverpool ABSTRACTS #SSHM2018 1 ROOMS: A: CTH-LTB/ B: CTH-LTC/ C: CHAD-BARKLA/ D: CHAD-ROTBLAT/ E: CTH-LTD/ F: CHAD-CHADWICK Keynote abstracts Wednesday 11 July 2018 17.15-18.45: Ruth Richardson, The Significance of n of 1: A Mid-Victorian Case Report, CTH-LTA Until quite recently, interest in “n of 1” reports had dwindled in medical literature, eclipsed by the preponderance of data from randomised controlled trials. But in history the exemplary quality of the single case in allowing light to penetrate dark corners of our ignorance remains understood, valued and appreciated. This lecture focuses upon a non-random, non-blinded and unrepeatable n of 1 crossover trial in the past. A sequentially-informed account of the hospital care of the same patient in two different institutions, it provides clear evidence of the contemporary operation of differing medico-surgical regimes and their concomitant modes of nursing care, in close geographical proximity. This case offers an extraordinary supplementary record which illuminates and enriches institutional, scientific, and social histories of mid-19th century healthcare. Thursday 12 July 2018 17.45-19.00 Martin Gorsky, Universal Health Coverage as a Goal of International Policy: Dialogue, Consensus and Conflict, CTH-LTA Amongst other major anniversaries (the NHS, the WHO) 2018 also marks 40 years since the WHO’s Alma Ata Declaration. This was a pledge by the international community to achieve Health for All by the Year 2000 through universal primary health care.
    [Show full text]
  • Wealth Matters for Health Equity Authors
    REPORT September 2018 Wealth Matters for Health Equity Authors Paula Braveman, University of California, San Francisco Julia Acker, University of California, San Francisco Elaine Arkin, Independent Consultant Dwayne Proctor, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Amy Gillman, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Kerry Anne McGeary, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Giridhar Mallya, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Acknowledgments We thank the following individuals who provided insightful and substantive comments on drafts: Susan Egerter, University of California, San Francisco David Erickson, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Kate Griffin, Prosperity Now Doug Jutte, Build Healthy Places Network Daniel Lau, Build Healthy Places Network Tracy Orleans, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Suggested Citation Content from this publication may be reproduced without permission provided the following citation is referenced: Braveman P, Acker J, Arkin E, Proctor D, Gillman A, McGeary KA, Mallya G. Wealth Matters for Health Equity. Princeton, NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 2018. Foreword This report also offers an Executive Summary. Other reports on health equity from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) include Early Childhood Is Critical for Health Equity and What Is Health Equity? And Contents What Difference Does a Definition Make? This report defines health equity (below) and takes a deeper look at what it means, as well as implications SECTION 1 2 for action. These reports aim to assist those working in public health, health Introduction care, and other fields that powerfully shape health—such as education, child care, employment, housing, and community development—to build a SECTION 2 3 world in which everyone can be as healthy as possible. Wealth and Health Are Closely Linked Health equity means that everyone has a fair and just opportunity to be as healthy as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing Risk Inequality Metrics in Tuberculosis Policy Development
    1 Introducing risk inequality metrics in tuberculosis policy 2 development 3 M. Gabriela M. Gomes1,2*, Juliane F. Oliveira2, Adelmo Bertolde3, Diepreye 4 Ayabina1, Tuan Anh Nguyen4, Ethel L. Maciel5, Raquel Duarte6, Binh Hoa Nguyen4, 5 Priya B. Shete7, Christian Lienhardt8,9 6 1Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool L3 5QA, United Kingdom. 7 2CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, 8 Universidade do Porto, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal. 9 3Departamento de Estatística, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, 10 Espírito Santo 29075-910, Brazil. 11 4National Lung Hospital, Hanoi 10000, Vietnam. 12 5Laboratório de Epidemiologia, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, 13 Espírito Santo 29047-105, Brazil. 14 6Faculdade de Medicina, and EPIUnit, Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do 15 Porto, 4050-091 Porto, Portugal. 16 7Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of California San 17 Francisco, 94110 San Francisco, USA. 18 8Global TB Programme, World Health Organization, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland. 19 9Unité Mixte Internationale TransVIHMI (UMI 233 IRD – U1175 INSERM – 20 Université de Montpellier), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), 21 34394 Montpellier, France. 22 23 * Correspondence and requests for materials should be addresses to M.G.M.G. (email: 24 [email protected]). 25 1 26 ABSTRACT 27 Global stakeholders including the World Health Organization rely on predictive 28 models for developing strategies and setting targets for tuberculosis care and control 29 programs. Failure to account for variation in individual risk leads to substantial biases 30 that impair data interpretation and policy decisions. Anticipated impediments to 31 estimating heterogeneity for each parameter are discouraging despite considerable 32 technical progress in recent years.
    [Show full text]
  • HEAT): Practice Example Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR
    Health Equity Assessment Tool (HEAT): practice example Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) PHE Health Equity Assessment Tool (HEAT) Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) – practice example Programme or project being Antimicrobial resistance campaigns and interventions assessed Date completed August 2017 Contact person (name, Dr Diane Ashiru-Oredope, HCAI & AMR Division: [email protected] ; directorate, email, phone) Viviana Finistrella, HCAI & AMR Division, National Infection Service: [email protected] Lina Toleikyte, National Health Inequalities Team: [email protected] Name of strategic leader Dr Diane Ashiru-Oredope Your response – remember to consider multiple dimensions of inequalities, including protected characteristics and Steps to take socio-economic differences A. Prepare – agree the scope of work and assemble the information you need 1 2 1. Your programme of work AMR is a global threat to public health affecting all healthcare systems and growing at an alarming pace. , What are the main aims of your The implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes has been used within secondary care to help work? reduce this burden, with a focus on the UK Government ambition to reduce inappropriate antibiotic 3 prescribing. An important element of these programmes is the use of national campaigns to increase the How do you expect your work to overall reach. reduce health inequalities? This HEAT assessment considers 4 of these national campaigns: • the Antibiotic Guardian campaign – a pledge-based system where
    [Show full text]
  • King, Brian (2017)
    HEALTH TOMORROW, VOL. 5 (2017) King, Brian (2017). States of Disease: Political Environments and Human Health. Oakland, California: University of California Press. ISBN 9780520278219 Reviewed by Sue G. Lurie, PhD This book by a health geographer applies the concept of social ecology, along with interdisciplinary theories of social conditions and determinants of health and health inequity, to analyze the impacts of changing political environments on human vulnerabilities to disease and illness. Key issues in health and wellness and disease prevention and management in South Africa are addressed, which have broader implications for the developing world. Comparative analysis of health policies is centered on political history from apartheid to democratic elections, with effects on changing explanations of disease causation, policies on preventive strategies, and access to antiretroviral treatment for HIV/AIDS. The environmental impacts of economic development and climate change on food insecurity and disease management, roles of non- governmental organizations, foreign aid and international economic development are related to variations in local capacities for improving and maintaining population health and health care. The author’s thesis is that spatial processes of negotiation for resources in political environments are integral in both disease epidemiology and community responses, with long- term implications for health of local populations. Based primarily on his extensive field research on HIV/AIDS and malaria in South Africa over a fifteen year period, this perspective is applied to expand the field of medical geography. The book complements research by physician/ anthropologist Paul Farmer (2015) on HIV/AIDS in rural Haiti, Rwanda and Lesotho since the 1980s, and policy advocacy for reducing poverty and inequity in international health, as cited by the author.
    [Show full text]