Book1278.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Book1278.Pdf 2006 2006 / 2006 – 1427 © . : !"# $ .2006 . . 2006 :! "# $% & '( / &'( )*+ ,- -. .4'($ 31 2 1647 .0./ (970/972) 2 240 6343 :)*+ (970/972) 2 240 6340 :, http://www.pcbs.gov.ps :-* -./0 [email protected] :!* 1 2007 5 $ • / ) 2/* 30 2 . *1 " 4 '1 & &( • 2/* 30 2 . 4 '1 ! /$ '. 5. " 66 • , ! /$ '. -++ . 7 8 • 2/* 30 2 . 9.& 8 • . 28 : •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• ,( '% ; ,( "% D ?N1 74@ " ' :*1 !$> :.8 &1 ! . : / "< - • - / -/$ "*; !+ -+ 01 4 $% '@ ! . ! 3 9 !+ &1 0@ .-(6 : $' • -D+. * " B . -$. : ( 01 : 8) N0 -1* &#4@ ! -+ "% 1% .& -#1 # -D+. * "1 ; ; -D+. * 7 : (( &- • * " B . -$. : :@$ ( 01 : 8) N0 -1* #4@ 29 " "% 1% .& -#1 # -D+. * "1 ; ; -D+. * -D+. : (< > $' • -.0 E 4 $% . -$. : ( 01 : 8) N0 -1* &#4@ ! -+ "% 1% .(-% % -1 4*) 4 ,0 !+ -#1 - #$ @+ &$% -1* :-& ( • E '; -. -$* -1* * B " A* :@ -1* &1 '@ ! -$. "% 1% .O * " &(4 % -$* : 7 " • .. -$. : O " $@ :1@ -1* A* &#+ ! - < "% 1% :*"7 ? & @AB (9' ;) •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،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able 1-1: Number of permanent military checkpoints commuters cross during traveling from one city to another by place of departure (governorate center) and place of arrival (governorate center), mid June 2006 Place of arrival اس Departure Deir * Khan North Jerus Jericho Qalq center Rafah Al- Gaza Hebron Ramallah Salfit Nablus Tulkarm Tubas Jenin Younis Gaza Beth * * * Balah * Jenin - - - - - - - - 3 3 - - 2 0 1 Tubas - - - - - - - - 3 3 - - 1 - 1 Tulkarm - - - - - - - - 2 3 - 1 2 - 0 Nablus - - - - - - - - 3 3 2 2 2 1 2 Qalqeiliah - - - - - - - - 2 2 - 2 1 - - Salfit - - - - - - - - - 2 - 2 - - - Ramallah - - - - - 3 2 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 3 Jericho - - - - - 3 2 1 1 - 2 3 2 3 3 Jerusalem - - - - - 3 3 1 1 - - - - - - Bethlehem - - - - - 2 3 - 2 - - - - - - Hebron - - - - - 3 3 3 3 - - - - - - North Gaza 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - Gaza 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - Deir Al- 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - Balah Khan 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - Younis Rafah 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - * Qalq: Qalqeiliah, Jerus: Jerusalem, Beth: Bethlehem, Jericho: Jericho and Al Aghwar, Ramallah: Ramallah and Al- Bireh : : : No Data : -No direct connectivity 15 ول 1-2: /د ا.&ا- ا( ا,+" ا"* ()ه ا&ا% $ل ا#"! ى ن ا درة (آ- ا. 12) و ن ا&5&ل (آ- ا. 12)، "67 -ان 2006 Table 1-2: Number of temporary military roadblocks commuters cross during traveling from one town to another by place of departure (governorate center) and place of arrival (governorate center), mid June 2006 Place of arrival اس Departure Khan Deir Al- North Jerus Jericho Qalq center Rafah Gaza Hebron Ramallah Salfit Nablus Tulkarm Tubas Jenin Younis Balah Gaza Beth * * * * Jenin - - - - - - - - 2 2 - - 3 1 1 Tubas - - - - - - - - 3 3 - - 2 - 2 Tulkarm - - - - - - - - 2 0 - 1 1 - 1 Nablus - - - - - - - - 1 1 1 1 0 3 3 Qalqeiliah - - - - - - - - 1 0 - 1 0 - - Salfit - - - - - - - - - : - 1 - - - Ramallah - - - - - 5 5 2 2 2 1 2 1 3 3 Jericho - - - - - 3 3 - 3 - 1 2 3 3 3 Jerusalem - - - - - : : : : - - - - - - Bethlehem - - - - - 0 2 - 2 - - - - - - Hebron - - - - - 1 3 2 2 - - - - - - North 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - Gaza ! Gaza 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - ! Deir Al- 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - " Balah Khan 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - Younis Rafah 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - "# *Qalq: Qalqeiliah, Jerus: Jerusalem, Beth: Bethlehem, Jericho: Jericho and Al-Aghwar, Ramallah: Ramallah and Al-Bireh : ! : : No Data : -No direct connectivity 16 2006 2000 ( ) ( ) () :31 Table 1-3: Traveled distance (km) during traveling from one town to another by place of departure (governorate center) and place of arrival (governorate center), before September 2000 and mid June 2006 Place of arrival اس Departure Deir Khan center Rafah Al-Balah Gaza Hebron Beth* Jerus* Jericho* Ramallah Salfit Qalq* Nablus Tulkarm Tubas Jenin Younis North Gaza Jenin - - - - - - - - 84 100 - - 52 42 23 (90) (89) (42) (51) (22) Tubas - - - - - - - - 50 110 - - 35 - 25 (49) (71) (22) (22) Tulkarm - - - - - - - - 100 95 - 34 30 - 45 (98) (76) (30) (29) (51) Nablus - - - - - - - - 69 53 21 40 30 40 52 (69) (47) (27) (32) (29) (22) (42) Qalqeiliah - - - - - - - - 110 86 - 40 34 - - (100) (79) (32) (30) Salfit - - - - - - - - - 34 - 21 - - - (50) (27) Ramallah - - - - - 78 50 18 45 34 85 54 95 108 105 (49) (24) (16) (37) (50) (79) (47) (76) (71) (89) Jericho - - - - - 75 50 - 45 - 110 69 100 50 84 ( (70) (44) (37) (100) (69) (97) (49) (90) Jerusalem - - - - - 35 19 - 18 - - - - - - (38) (11) (16) Bethlehem - - - - - 32 19 - 58 - - - - - - (27) (11) (24) Hebron - - - - - 35 35 85 80 - - - - - - (26) (38) (70) (49) North Gaza - - - 11 - - - - - - - - - - - Gaza 38 30 21 11 - - - - - - - - - - - Deir Al- - 18 21 - - - - - - - - - - - - Balah Khan 9 18 30 - - - - - - - - - - - - Younis Rafah 9 - 39 - - - - - - - - - - - - * Qalq: Qalqeiliah, Jerus: Jerusalem, Beth: Bethlehem, Jericho: Jericho and Al Aghwar, Ramallah: Ramallah : : and Al- Bireh . -No direct connectivity ( ) Distance from departure center to arrival center prior to September 2000. .2000 ( ) 17 2006 ( ) ( ) ( ) :41 Table 1-4: The mean single journey time (in minutes) during traveling from one town to another by place of departure (governorate center) and place of arrival (governorate center), mid June 2006 Place of arrival اس أر Departure Deir Khan Jerus Qalq center Rafah Al- Gaza Hebron Jericho* Ramallah Salfit Nablus Tulkarm Tubas Jenin Younis North Beth * * Balah Gaza * Jenin - - - - - - - - 150 140 - - 93 59 49 Tubas - - - - - - - - 158 155 - - 89 - 48 Tulkarm - - - - - - - - 120 120 - 42 47 - 60 Nablus - - - - - - - - 155 150 98 95 67 105 115 Qalqeiliah - - - - - - - - 178 150 - 65 42 - - Salfit - - - - - - - - - : - 45 - - - Ramallah - - - - - 100 85 43 45 40 93 53 73 135 129 Jericho - - - - - 120 68 - 50 - 113 100 110 160 123 Jerusalem - - - - - : : : : - - - - - - Bethlehem - - - - -
Recommended publications
  • Far'a Refugee Camp
    west bank west unrwa profile: far’a camp tubas governorate Overview UNRWA in Far’a Camp Far’a camp is located in a rural area General Information UNRWA in Far’a Camp 17 km northeast of Nablus. The camp • Established: 1950 Main UNRWA installations: is geographically isolated, thus many • Size: 0.26 sq km • Three schools services can only be accessed in Jenin • Population before 1967 (OCHA): • One health centre and Nablus. Though Far’a camp’s 7,060 UNRWA employees working in isolation is in many ways detrimental • Estimated population (PCBS): 7,100 Far’a camp: 110 to the residents’ livelihoods, the lack • Registered persons (UNRWA): 8,500 • Education: 72 of nearby city centres makes the land • Estimated density: 32,692 per sq km • Health: 19 surrounding the camp affordable in • Places of origin: Areas north-east of • Relief and social services: 3 price, unlike most other camps located Haifa • Sanitation services:11 next to urban centres. This gives some • Administration: 5 Far’a camp refugees the opportunity to move outside the camp. As such, Education Far’a camp has fewer issues than other camps in relation to overcrowding. There are three schools in Far’a camp: two UNRWA girls’ schools that serve over 750 students and one UNRWA boys’ school that serves over 800 students. Facilities in the schools include libraries and computer and science laboratories. UNRWA psychosocial counsellors Unemployment is a major concern are present in the schools and remedial classes in Arabic and mathematics are offered on for the residents of Far’a camp. While Saturdays.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Climate Change on Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank
    COMPOUNDING VULNERABILITY: IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON PALESTINIANS IN GAZA AND THE WEST BANK MICHAEL MASON, MARK ZEITOUN, AND ZIAD MIMI Coping with (and adapting to) climatological hazards is commonly understood in intergovernmental and aid agency fora as a purely tech- nical matter. This article examines the UN Development Programme’s stakeholder consultations in the West Bank and Gaza Strip in order to challenge the donor-driven technical-managerial framing of Palestinian climate vulnerability by showing how Israeli occupa- tion practices exacerbate environmental stresses. While emphasizing the importance of social, economic, and political contexts in shap- ing populations’ responses to climate change in general, the authors demonstrate the multiple ways in which the occupation speci!cally compounds hazards reveals it as constitutive of Palestinian climate vulnerability. AT THE DECEMBER 2009 !fteenth conference of the parties (COP15) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in Copenhagen, 130 heads of state and government af!rmed their commit- ments to address climate change, including Palestinian Authority (PA) Prime Minister Salam Fayyad and Israeli President Shimon Peres. Observ- ers hoping that shared climate risks would be an area for Palestinian- Israeli cooperation were disappointed. Both leaders acknowledged that signi!cant climate change was forecasted by the end of this century for the Eastern Mediterranean region: its impacts, Fayyad noted, included decreased precipitation, signi!cant warming, more frequent extreme weather events, and a rise in sea level.1 There was also a shared recogni- tion that the key hazards posed by these changes—greater water scarcity, falling agricultural productivity, an increased probability of "ash "oods, and saline intrusion into groundwater—will be accentuated by a growing population.
    [Show full text]
  • Occupied Palestinian Territory (Including East Jerusalem)
    Reporting period: 29 March - 4 April 2016 Weekly Highlights For the first week in almost six months there have been no Palestinian nor Israeli fatalities recorded. 88 Palestinians, including 18 children, were injured by Israeli forces across the oPt. The majority of injuries (76 per cent) were recorded during demonstrations marking ‘Land Day’ on 30 March, including six injured next to the perimeter fence in the Gaza Strip, followed by search and arrest operations. The latter included raids in Azzun ‘Atma (Qalqiliya) and Ya’bad (Jenin) involving property damage and the confiscation of two vehicles, and a forced entry into a school in Ras Al Amud in East Jerusalem. On 30 occasions, Israeli forces opened fire in the Access Restricted Area (ARA) at land and sea in Gaza, injuring two Palestinians as far as 350 meters from the fence. Additionally, Israeli naval forces shelled a fishing boat west of Rafah city, destroying it completely. Israeli forces continued to ban the passage of Palestinian males between 15 and 25 years old through two checkpoints controlling access to the H2 area of Hebron city. This comes in addition to other severe restrictions on Palestinian access to this area in place since October 2015. During the reporting period, Israeli forces removed the restrictions imposed last week on Beit Fajjar village (Bethlehem), which prevented most residents from exiting and entering the village. This came following a Palestinian attack on Israeli soldiers near Salfit, during which the suspected perpetrators were killed. Israeli forces also opened the western entrance to Hebron city, which connects to road 35 and to the commercial checkpoint of Tarqumiya.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report #4
    Fellow engineers Annual Report #4 Program Name: Local Government & Infrastructure (LGI) Program Country: West Bank & Gaza Donor: USAID Award Number: 294-A-00-10-00211-00 Reporting Period: October 1, 2013 - September 30, 2014 Submitted To: Tony Rantissi / AOR / USAID West Bank & Gaza Submitted By: Lana Abu Hijleh / Country Director/ Program Director / LGI 1 Program Information Name of Project1 Local Government & Infrastructure (LGI) Program Country and regions West Bank & Gaza Donor USAID Award number/symbol 294-A-00-10-00211-00 Start and end date of project September 30, 2010 – September 30, 2015 Total estimated federal funding $100,000,000 Contact in Country Lana Abu Hijleh, Country Director/ Program Director VIP 3 Building, Al-Balou’, Al-Bireh +972 (0)2 241-3616 [email protected] Contact in U.S. Barbara Habib, Program Manager 8601 Georgia Avenue, Suite 800, Silver Spring, MD USA +1 301 587-4700 [email protected] 2 Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations …………………………………….………… 4 Program Description………………………………………………………… 5 Executive Summary…………………………………………………..…...... 7 Emergency Humanitarian Aid to Gaza……………………………………. 17 Implementation Activities by Program Objective & Expected Results 19 Objective 1 …………………………………………………………………… 24 Objective 2 ……………………................................................................ 42 Mainstreaming Green Elements in LGI Infrastructure Projects…………. 46 Objective 3…………………………………………………........................... 56 Impact & Sustainability for Infrastructure and Governance ……............
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Services Council Solid Waste Management Project Jenin
    Joint Services Council for Solid Waste Management Project In 1998 a comprehensive approach to improving waste management services in the West Bank was initiated under the Solid Waste and Environmental Management – Project ( Swemp) in Palestine. Joint Services Council for Solid Waste Management z A quasi–governmental and regional entity established in accordance with the Local Government Law. z The JSC is managed by a Board that consists of 20 local Authorities (15 municipalities and 5 village councils). Fulfillment of the Credit Agreement Conditions - The on-lending agreement between the Ministry of Finance and the JSC was signed; - The land was secured through purchase or long term lease by the JSC; - The PIU was established & became the executive branch of the JSC; - A Deposit Account was created (US$63,000 from the local authorities); - A tariff for waste collection and disposal was set and adopted by the local authorities. JSC Mission Statement is: z To provide an organized and effective SWM service; z To seek long-term sustainability of service by building technical capacities at local authorities; z To raise public awareness and promote effective public participation; z To comply with pertinent laws and regulations prevailing in Palestine. The Project z Components: Construct a sanitary landfill; Closing and rehabilitation random dumpsites and eliminate waste burning; and Improve Access to the new site; z Cost: US$14 million (US$9 million Credit from World Bank + US$3.75 million from the EU + US$1.25 million contribution from the local authorities). Zahrat Al Finjan Landfill Location Dumpsites Before Rehabilitation Dumpsite During Rehabilitation: Dumpsite After Rehabilitation ZF Landfill Project The Area : the purchased land is 240,000 m2, the area of the cells which are ready to be used is 90000 m2, the cells are going to serve the northern governorates for about 15 years during the first stage , than the cells will be extended in the remaining land owned by the council.
    [Show full text]
  • National Report, State of Palestine United Nations
    National Report, State of Palestine United Nations Conference on Human Settlements (Habitat III) 2014 Ministry of Public Works and Housing National Report, State of Palestine, UN-Habitat 1 Photo: Jersualem, Old City Photo for Jerusalem, old city Table of Contents FORWARD 5 I. INTRODUCTION 7 II. URBAN AGENDA SECTORS 12 1. Urban Demographic 12 1.1 Current Status 12 1.2 Achievements 18 1.3 Challenges 20 1.4 Future Priorities 21 2. Land and Urban Planning 22 2. 1 Current Status 22 2.2 Achievements 22 2.3 Challenges 26 2.4 Future Priorities 28 3. Environment and Urbanization 28 3. 1 Current Status 28 3.2 Achievements 30 3.3 Challenges 31 3.4 Future Priorities 32 4. Urban Governance and Legislation 33 4. 1 Current Status 33 4.2 Achievements 34 4.3 Challenges 35 4.4 Future Priorities 36 5. Urban Economy 36 5. 1 Current Status 36 5.2 Achievements 38 5.3 Challenges 38 5.4 Future Priorities 39 6. Housing and Basic Services 40 6. 1 Current Status 40 6.2 Achievements 43 6.3 Challenges 46 6.4 Future Priorities 49 III. MAIN INDICATORS 51 Refrences 52 Committee Members 54 2 Lists of Figures Figure 1: Percent of Palestinian Population by Locality Type in Palestine 12 Figure 2: Palestinian Population by Governorate in the Gaza Strip (1997, 2007, 2014) 13 Figure 3: Palestinian Population by Governorate in the West Bank (1997, 2007, 2014) 13 Figure 4: Palestinian Population Density of Built-up Area (Person Per km²), 2007 15 Figure 5: Percent of Change in Palestinian Population by Locality Type West Bank (1997, 2014) 15 Figure 6: Population Distribution
    [Show full text]
  • Pesticides and Agroecology in the Occupied West Bank Conclusions from a Joint APN-PANAP Mission in Palestine, May 2016
    Pesticides and Agroecology in the Occupied West Bank Conclusions from a Joint APN-PANAP Mission in Palestine, May 2016 Dr Meriel Watts, Tanya Lee, Heather Aidy PAN Asia Pacific and Arab Group for the Protection of Nature June 2016 Pesticides and Agroecology in the Occupied West Bank Conclusions from a Joint APN-PANAP Mission in Palestine, May 2016 Dr Meriel Watts, Tanya Lee, Heather Aidy PAN Asia Pacific and Arab Group for the Protection of Nature June 2016 Photos: Meriel Watts unless otherwise specified 4 5 Overview In May 2016, representatives from Arab Group for the Protection of Nature (APN) and PAN Asia Pacific (PANAP) undertook a visit to the Occupied West Bank in Palestine that was facilitated by the Palestinian Farmers Union and Palestinian Voluntary Work Committee. One of the main purposes of this visit was to assess the human rights and environmental implications of the manufacture and illicit trade in pesticides into the Occupied West Bank from inside the Green Line (refer to the next section for an explanation of this terminology). Much of the material in this report was obtained from site visits and discussions with government officials especially the Environmental Quality Authority, union leaders, workers, farmers, pastoralists, medical personnel, educators and students in Hebron, Qalqilya, Salfit, Tubas, Jericho and Tulkarem Governorates. Palestinian pastoralists beside an encroaching illegal Israeli agricultural settlement, Northern Jordan Valley, Tubas Agriculture forms a critical part of the Palestinian economy and society for a variety of reasons, including employment, food security, and prevention of encroachment by illegal Israeli settlements.1 However, farming is significantly hindered by the imposition of the military occupation of Palestine by Israel and the activities of illegal Israeli settlers.
    [Show full text]
  • Operationalizing the Humanitarian-Development Nexus, Council Conclusions, 19 May 2017
    1. INTRODUCTION 8 Strategic and Operational Expected Outcomes 10 2. WHY A NEXUS APPROACH FOR THE OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORY? 14 Processes triggered by the WBPC 17 3. CONTEXT ANALYSIS FOR DESIGNING A NEXUS STRATEGY 24 3.1 The Matrix 24 3.2 The Analysis 27 3.2.1 Crisis Typology 27 3.2.2 Context Determinants 30 3.2.3 Comparative Advantage: “Italian System” 32 4. OPERATIONALIZATION OF THE NEXUS TO THE PALESTINIAN CONTEXT 38 Table of Contents 4.1 Territorial Approach: connect communities with territorial planning 39 4.2 Mainstreaming International Human Rights Law, International Humanitarian Law and International Refugee Law provision in needs analysis 46 4.3 Strengthening resilience of Palestinian communities and governance mechanisms 56 5. CASE STUDIES RESULTING FROM THE PROPOSED NEXUS APPROACH: Coherence and Complementarity 70 5.1. Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs: DEVELOPMENT FUNDING 72 5.2. WeWorld-GVC Investment and UNICEF Funding: Humanitarian and LRRD Funds 77 5.3. EU DG NEAR Funding: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 82 Annex 1: Community Protection Approach - Operationalizing the Nexus 87 Annex 2: Context Analysis and Mapping Matrix 89 Abbreviations and Acronyms LRRD Linking Relief, Rehabilitation and Development MDLF Municipal Development Lending Fund Area C Team Area C Coordination Office MoLG Ministry of Local Government ACF Action Contre la Faim MoU Memorandum of Understanding AICS Italian Agency for Development and Cooperation Office MS Member States CBO Community-Based Organization NGO Non-Governmental Organization CPC Community
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Briefing Notes 24 – 30 May 2006 | 1 U N I T E D N a T I O N S N a T I O N S U N I E S
    U N I TOCHA E D Weekly N A Briefing T I O NotesN S 24 – 30 May 2006 N A T I O N S| 1 U N I E S OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS P.O. Box 38712, East Jerusalem, Phone: (+972) 2-582 9962 / 582 5853, Fax: (+972) 2-582 5841 [email protected], www.ochaopt.org Protection of Civilians – Weekly Briefing Notes 24 – 30 May 2006 Of note this period • High numbers of Palestinian deaths and injuries were reported this week including: (1) four Palestinian deaths and 87 Palestinian injuries following a confrontation between the IDF and Palestinians in the central square of Ramallah city (Ramallah). One IDF soldier was also injured; and (2) four Palestinians deaths and 10 Palestinian injuries after an IDF Special Forces Unit entered approximately 2km into the Gaza Strip and ambushed Palestinian militants attempting to launch a homemade rocket. Palestinian injuries were also reported following IDF artillery shelling in the area (see below). • Two incidents reported by Palestine Red Crescent Society (PRCS): (1) a PRCS ambulance was subjected to direct Israeli gunfire and delayed for forty minutes while transporting a woman in labour to a hospital inside Nablus city; and (2) four Palestinian paramedics were injured and two ambulances damaged in the northern Gaza Strip by an IDF artillery shell while transporting dead and injured from the area. 1. Physical Protection 150 100 50 0 Children Women Injuries Deaths Deaths Deaths Palestinians 118 17 1 - Israelis 5--- Internationals 4--- • At least 28 homemade (Qassam) rockets were fired by Palestinian militants from the Gaza Strip toward targets inside Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Area a Area B Area C Israeli Settlements the Separation Wall, Implemented the Separation Wall, Under Construction Dead Sea Jorda
    Area A Area B Area C Israeli Settlements The Separation Wall, Implemented The Separation Wall, Under Construction Dead Sea Jordan River Natuar Reserv Area C embodies Palestine: terraced hills with olive groves where shepherds wander with their flocks and Special issue ghazal feed on misty mornings; striking wadis where foxes and mountain goats roam; the dry, rolling desert hills and green oases of al-ghor, the Jordan valley Area C that is less and less accessible to Palestinians; the disappearing Dead Sea where Palestinians no longer feel welcome to swim. Area C comprises sixty-one percent of the West Bank and is crucial for a viable Palestinian State. Connecting Palestine’s cities and villages, 4 Sustainable Urban Development in feeding its citizens, containing a wealth of natural and economic resources, the State of Palestine: An Opportunity housing immeasurable heritage and archeological treasures, it is among the most Interrupted beautiful places in the world - but not under Palestinian control and thus, as of yet, 6 MDGs to SDGs as a viable resource mostly untapped. In Area C, check points and the Separation 10 Area C of the West Bank: Strategic Wall restrict movement and access, which impacts livelihoods and restrains the Importance and Development Prospects entire economy; here the denial of building permits and house demolitions are as much a part of daily life as the uprooting of olive groves and the prevention of 18 International Experts Call for Fundamental Area A farmers from cultivating their fields and orchards. But Area C is also where the Area B Changes in Israel’s Approach to Planning Area C Israeli Settlements creative mind of Palestinians has found ingenious ways of showing resilience and The Segregation Wall, Existing and Development in Area C The Segregation Wall, Under Construction Dead Sea developing strategies for survival and development and in this issue you can read Jordan River 24 National Strategies for Area C Natuar Reserv about some of these.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Consultation on Effects of the COVID-19 on Women in Palestine
    Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics A Summary of Statistical Indicators on Women in Palestine during the Covid19 Crises Most Vulnerable Women Segments Around 10,745 women Health care health system workers and a total of 31,873 workers men and women 900 women working in workers in Palestine Women working in Israel Israel and settlements and settelements mostly in agriculture 175891 total females with chronic Women with Chronic disease 69,112 women suffer from at least one Chronic Disease (60+) Disease The percentage of poverty Female Childen with disease 9,596 female among households headed children with chronic by women in 2017 was 19% in the WB and 54% in Poor women Gaza Strip Elderly women In 2020 there are 140 287 60+ women 92,584 women heading households (61241 WB, Women Heading households 31343 Gaza Strip – 41,017 of highest in Jericho women have Women with disabilities at least one type of disability 1 Social Characteristics 1. The elderly (the most vulnerable group) • The number of elderly people (60+ years) in the middle of 2020 is around 269,346, (5.3% women, 140,287, and 129,059 men) • The percentage of elderly in Palestine was 5.0% of the total population in 2017 (5.4% for the elderly females, 4.6% for the elderly males), and in the West Bank it is higher than in the Gaza Strip (5.4 % In the West Bank and 4.3% in the Gaza Strip). • At the governorate level, the highest percentage of elderly people was in the governorates of Tulkarm, Ramallah, Al-Bireh, Bethlehem, and Jerusalem (6.5%, 6.0%, 6.0%, and 5.9%, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Protection of Civilians – Weekly Briefing Notes 26 April – 2 May 2006
    U N I TOCHA E D Weekly N A Briefing T I O NotesN S 26 April – 2 May 2006 N A T I O N S| 1 U N I E S OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS P.O. Box 38712, East Jerusalem, Phone: (+972) 2-582 9962 / 582 5853, Fax: (+972) 2-582 5841 [email protected], www.ochaopt.org Protection of Civilians – Weekly Briefing Notes 26 April – 2 May 2006 Of note this period • Comprehensive external closure continued for the seventh consecutive week (since 11 March) with no movement of Palestinian workers and traders in Israel. The IDF announced on 1 May that the closure would also include national staff of international organisations. • Internal movement within the West Bank and into the Jordan Valley remained very restricted. Restrictions for Palestinians from the northern West Bank to move south of Nablus governorate continue to remain in place. Movement through Tayasir and Hamra checkpoints (Tubas) remain restricted. Humanitarian organisations and ambulances are facing major access problems at ‘Asira ash Shamaliya checkpoint in Nablus. 1. Physical Protection 30 20 10 0 Children Women Injuries Deaths Deaths Deaths Palestinians 25 2 - 1 Israelis 1--- Internationals ---- • During the week the IDF fired more than 90 artillery tank shells, particularly into the northern areas and east of Gaza City (Gaza Strip) resulting in Palestinian injuries. The IAF also conducted one air strike (targeted killing) in the Gaza Strip killing one Palestinian man and injuring another. • At least 23 home made (Qassam) rockets were fired by Palestinian militants from the Gaza Strip toward targets inside Israel.
    [Show full text]