DOCSLIB.ORG

Hate Crime Report 031008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hate Crime Report 031008 HATE CRIMES IN THE OSCE REGION - INCIDENTS AND RESPONSES ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2007 Warsaw, October 2008 Foreword In 2007, violent manifestations of intolerance continued to take place across the OSCE region. Such acts, although targeting individuals, affected entire communities and instilled fear among victims and members of their communities. The destabilizing effect of hate crimes and the potential for such crimes and incidents to threaten the security of individuals and societal cohesion – by giving rise to wider-scale conflict and violence – was acknowledged in the decision on tolerance and non-discrimination adopted by the OSCE Ministerial Council in Madrid in November 2007.1 The development of this report is based on the task the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) received “to serve as a collection point for information and statistics on hate crimes and relevant legislation provided by participating States and to make this information publicly available through … its report on Challenges and Responses to Hate-Motivated Incidents in the OSCE Region”.2 A comprehensive consultation process with governments and civil society takes place during the drafting of the report. In February 2008, ODIHR issued a first call to the nominated national points of contact on combating hate crime, to civil society, and to OSCE institutions and field operations to submit information for this report. The requested information included updates on legislative developments, data on hate crimes and incidents, as well as practical initiatives for combating hate crime. I am pleased to note that the national points of contact provided ODIHR with information and updates on a more systematic basis. Since governments were given the opportunity to comment on the drafts in May and June, ODIHR was able to provide the most up-to-date and accurate information. The consultative process also included regular contact with civil-society organizations, as well as OSCE institutions and field operations. ODIHR is committed to further enhancing the content of the report and providing more comprehensive information on the responses of OSCE states to violent acts of hate and intolerance. This was one of the motives that led ODIHR and the Finnish Chairmanship to organize a meeting with the national points of contact in June this year. The meeting provided an important forum to discuss future collaboration and to identify ways in which the quality and accuracy of the information contained in the report could be even more enhanced. I very much hope that future reports will build upon the existing good co-operation that ODIHR shares with the national points of contact and participating 1 OSCE Ministerial Council Decision No. 10/07, “Tolerance and Non-Discrimination: Promoting Mutual Respect and Understanding”, Madrid, 30 November 2007, <http://www.osce.org/documents/mcs/2007/12/28629_en.pdf>. 2 OSCE Ministerial Council Decision No. 13/06, “Combating Intolerance and Discrimination and Promoting Mutual Respect and Understanding”, Brussels, 5 December 2006, <http://www.osce.org/documents/mcs/2006/12/22565_en.pdf>. 2 States, as the comprehensive nature and quality of our reporting are contingent upon the input we receive. A number of positive responses and practical initiatives are emphasized in this report. While this list is not exhaustive, it is important to emphasize the value of these tools in the prevention, awareness-raising, and promotion of mutual respect and understanding. ODIHR hopes that these accomplishments will encourage governments and civil society to further strengthen their action in these fields. To this end, I also invite all participating States to review the first of the two ODIHR toolboxes for combating hate crime, which are presented at the end of this report. I would encourage participating States to seek our technical assistance and expertise in order to improve the implementation of OSCE commitments. We will continue to develop and refine these tools accordingly. In conclusion, I wish to thank all our contributors, including those in governments, institutions, and civil society. Their effective responses to hate-motivated violence help in the fight against racism, xenophobia, anti-Semitism and other forms of intolerance and discrimination, including against Muslims, Christians, and members of other religions. I hope that our continued efforts will further promote a climate of greater respect and understanding. Ambassador Janez Lenar!i! ODIHR Director 3 Executive Summary This year’s ODIHR report on hate crime in the OSCE region, summarized below, finds a continued pattern of brutal attacks on visibly identifiable groups, often intended to degrade or humiliate the victims. Many of the attacks coincided with religious holidays and/or prayer times. Another alarming development was the emergence of the Holocaust as a rhetorical means to threaten and offend Jews, underlined by frequent damage to Holocaust memorials. Hate-motivated incidents against Muslims, Christians, and other religious groups continued to be significantly under-reported and under-recorded, as were homophobic crimes. Those standing up to defend human rights also came under attack, with numerous hate crimes reported against activists and leaders of minority groups. Sporting events were particularly prone to acts of intolerance of a racist, anti-Semitic, or xenophobic nature. Perhaps most disturbing was a trend for high-ranking members of government and mainstream political parties to introduce prejudices against various such groups into the realm of public discussion. On the basis of existing commitments, and through co-ordination with relevant OSCE executive structures, Decision No. 13/06 of the 2006 Ministerial Council encouraged ODIHR to: • “continue to serve as a collection point for information and statistics on hate crimes and relevant legislation provided by participating States and to make this information publicly available through its Tolerance and Non-Discrimination Information System and its report on Challenges and Responses to Hate- Motivated Incidents in the OSCE Region”; • “strengthen, within its existing resources, its early warning function to identify, report and raise awareness on hate-motivated incidents and trends and to provide recommendations and assistance to participating States, upon their request, in areas where more adequate responses are needed”.3 This second annual report is a continuation of ODIHR's task to serve as a collection point for information related to hate crimes, including legislation and statistics, and to raise awareness about existing responses to such crimes within OSCE participating States. The aim of this report is to provide an overview of practical efforts and measures undertaken by governments and civil society to combat violent and non-violent manifestations of hate and to promote mutual respect and understanding. An introductory note on terminology and methodology explains why specific terms and definitions are used and provides an explanation of the different types of sources ODIHR relied on to produce this report. 3 Ibid. 4 Part I is divided into two sections: legal developments and an overview of hate-crime data collected by OSCE participating States. The section on hate-crime legislation provides a summary of international and national developments reported in 2007. It also discusses the challenges that states face in ensuring effective implementation of legislation. The section on hate-crime data looks at patterns and developments related to the collection of, and reporting on, hate-crime data across the OSCE region. A summary of official government data is included, as well as data collected and reported by specialized bodies and inter-governmental and non-governmental organizations. This section also presents the continued challenges that states face in collecting comprehensive, accurate, and disaggregated data. Part II identifies a range of violent, hate-motivated crimes and incidents, with a view to identifying and illustrating recurrent patterns and responses in OSCE participating States during 2007. Violent hate-motivated incidents include: • racist and xenophobic incidents (including against Roma and Sinti and also migrants, national and visible minorities, refugees, and asylum seekers); • anti-Semitic incidents; • incidents based on intolerance and discrimination against Muslims; • incidents related to intolerance and discrimination against Christians and members of other religions; • homophobic incidents;4 • incidents against human-rights defenders active in the area of tolerance and non- discrimination. Part III examines non-violent expressions of intolerance and the role that speeches, political campaigns, and websites played in provoking hostility, prejudice, and even violence across the OSCE region in 2007. In presenting examples of expressions and manifestations of hate and intolerance, these issues are discussed within a broader human-rights framework that acknowledges the fundamental right to freedom of expression and that also recognizes the significant differences in the ways that OSCE states deal with the issue of hate speech. Part IV includes an overview of new measures and initiatives undertaken by governments, specialized bodies, and inter-governmental and non-governmental organizations to prevent and respond to hate crimes and incidents. Examples of new 4 It is important to note that there remains no clear consensus among OSCE participating States about the specific inclusion
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ROMA INCLUSION in the CROATIAN SOCIETY Identity, Social Distance and the Experience of Discrimination
    Europska unija Zajedno do fondova EU ROMA INCLUSION IN THE CROATIAN SOCIETY identity, social distance and the experience of discrimination Nikola Rašić - Danijela Lucić - Branka Galić - Nenad Karajić Publisher: Office for Human Rights and the Rights of National Minorities of the Government of the Republic of Croatia For the publisher: Alen Tahiri, M.A.Pol Sci Year of publication: 2020 Original title: Uključivanje Roma u hrvatsko društvo: identitet, socijalna distanca i iskustvo diskriminacije Authors: Nikola Rašić, Danijela Lucić, Branka Galić, Nenad Karajić Reviewers: Helena Popović and Krunoslav Nikodem Translation: Sinonim d.o.o. Graphic design, editing and printing: Kerschoffset d.o.o. Circulation: 50 copies Cataloguing-in-Publication data available in the Online Catalogue of the National and University Library in Zagreb under CIP record 001083072. ISBN: 978-953-7870-26-3 Projekt je sufinancirala Europska unija iz Europskog socijalnog fonda. Sadržaj publikacije isključiva je odgovornost Ureda za ljudska prava i prava nacionalnih manjina Vlade Republike Hrvatske. Za više informacija: Ured za ljudska prava i prava nacionalnih manjina Vlade Republike Hrvatske Mesnička 23, 10 000 Zagreb, + 385 (1) 4569 358, [email protected] Više informacija o EU fondovima dostupno je na www.strukturnifondovi.hr ROMA INCLUSION IN THE CROATIAN SOCIETY identity, social distance and the experience of discrimination Nikola Rašić - Danijela Lucić - Branka Galić - Nenad Karajić Zagreb, 2020 DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the institutions in which the authors are employed nor the views of the Office for Human Rights and the Rights of National Minorities of the Government of the Republic of Croatia.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. PODCAST REPORT TOP 100 PODCASTS by DOWNLOADS Podcasts Ranked by Average Weekly Downloads in the United States Reporting Period: March 16 - April 12, 2020
    U.S. PODCAST REPORT TOP 100 PODCASTS BY DOWNLOADS Podcasts Ranked by Average Weekly Downloads in the United States Reporting Period: March 16 - April 12, 2020 # OF NEW RANK PODCAST PODCAST NETWORK SALES REPRESENTATION EPISODES CHANGE 1 NPR News Now NPR National Public Media 672 0 2 Up First NPR National Public Media 30 h2 3 The Ben Shapiro Show Cumulus Media/Westwood One Cumulus Media/Westwood One 22 0 4 My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff Stitcher Midroll 9 i2 and Georgia Hardstark 5 Planet Money NPR National Public Media 11 h3 6 NPR Politics NPR National Public Media 21 h1 7 Fresh Air NPR National Public Media 24 i1 8 Pod Save America RADIO.COM/Cadence13 Cadence 13 8 h1 9 Dateline NBC NBC News Wondery Brand Partnerships 13 i4 10 Indicator from Planet Money NPR National Public Media 20 h3 11 Hidden Brain NPR National Public Media 4 i1 12 Fox News Radio Newscast FOX News Podcasts FOX News Podcasts 672 h4 13 TED Radio Hour NPR National Public Media 5 h1 14 Office Ladies Stitcher Midroll 4 i3 15 How I Built This NPR National Public Media 6 0 16 Wait Wait... Don't Tell Me! NPR National Public Media 5 h5 17 The Dan Bongino Show Cumulus Media/Westwood One Cumulus Media/Westwood One 21 i5 18 Freakonomics Radio Stitcher Midroll 5 h1 19 The Rachel Maddow Show NBC News Wondery Brand Partnerships 21 h1 20 Unlocking Us with Brené Brown RADIO.COM/Cadence13 Cadence13 7 New 21 Conan O’Brien Needs A Friend Stitcher Midroll 4 i3 22 Oprah’s SuperSoul Conversations Stitcher Midroll 4 i5 23 VIEWS with David Dobrik and Jason RADIO.COM/Cadence13 Cadence13
    [Show full text]
  • NGO Shadow Report
    United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women NGO Shadow Report Complementing the Seventh and Eighth Country Report of the Austrian Government to the CEDAW Committee Frauen:Rechte jetzt! NGO Forum for the implementation of CEDAW in Austria (Ed.) www.frauenrechte-jetzt.at Vienna, May 2012 Published by: Frauen:Rechte jetzt! NGO Forum for the implementation of CEDAW in Austria (Ed.) www.frauenrechte-jetzt.at Contact information: [email protected] May 2012 This report received financial support from: Austrian Federal Chancellery - Federal Minister for Women and the Civil Service Table of Contents Introduction............................................................................................................................................ 5 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 5 Article 2 CEDAW - Policy measures for the elimination of discrimination ..................................... 6 a. General policy measures............................................................................................................ 6 b. Gender Budgeting....................................................................................................................... 8 Article 3 CEDAW - Guarantee of Basic Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of Women .. 9 a. Domestic violence against women ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Politics of Multilingualism in Roma Education in Early Soviet Union and Its Current Projections Marushiakova, Elena; Popov, Vesselin
    www.ssoar.info Politics of multilingualism in Roma education in early Soviet Union and its current projections Marushiakova, Elena; Popov, Vesselin Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Marushiakova, E., & Popov, V. (2017). Politics of multilingualism in Roma education in early Soviet Union and its current projections. Social Inclusion, 5(4), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v5i4.1128 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY Lizenz (Namensnennung) zur This document is made available under a CC BY Licence Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden (Attribution). For more Information see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de Social Inclusion (ISSN: 2183–2803) 2017, Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages 48–59 DOI: 10.17645/si.v5i4.1128 Article Politics of Multilingualism in Roma Education in Early Soviet Union and Its Current Projections Elena Marushiakova * and Vesselin Popov School of History, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, KY16 9BA, UK; E-Mails: [email protected] (E.M.), [email protected] (V.P.) * Corresponding author Submitted: 14 August 2017 | Accepted: 16 October 2017 | Published: 22 December 2017 Abstract This article presents the history of the politics of multilingualism (or lack thereof) in regard to Roma (formerly known as ‘Gypsies’). In the 1920s and 1930s in the newly established Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, against a backdrop of pro- claimed principles of full equality of all peoples1 living in the new state, commenced a rapid creation of schools for Roma children with instruction in Romani mother-tongue along with special training of Roma teachers.
    [Show full text]
  • European Policy Review
    EUROPEAN POLICY REVIEW Volume 2, Number 1 * 2018 * Published by the European Student Think Tank EUROPEAN POLICY REVIEW Volume 2, Number 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS In 2014, the European Student Think Tank established the European Policy Review, a peer-reviewed journal. The journal aims to publish academic papers by undergraduate and postgraduate students on topics related to pol- icy-making in the European Union. All papers are submitted to an anonymous peer-review process conducted 1 EDITOR’S NOTE by graduate and doctoral students. This year marks the beginning of the second volume of the European Policy Review. The journal is to be published annually. CINDY LANGER EDITORIAL POLICIES ANONYMITY Articles for submission are anonymised before entering the THE REVIEW PROCESS review process. We also ask reviewers not to identity them- 3 QUESTIONING THE NARRATIVE: Posted Workers and Wage In order to determine the submitted papers’ suitability selves to authors in order to maintain referee confidentiality Dynamics in the EU Single Market and to preserve the anonymity of the review process. for publication, the journal applies the requirements of a ARTHUR CORAZZA and SEVERIN RAPP peer-review process as follows. LICENSE TO PUBLISH All submitted papers are read by the editorial team. Only This journal is published under the Creative Commons those papers that are most likely to meet the quality criteria License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 and are judged to be of potential interest to the intended International (CCBY-NC-ND 4.0). Please cite and use ac- 19 A UNION IN CRISIS: Bleak Prospects for a Pan-European Public audience are sent for formal review, typically two reviewers.
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting the Social Inclusion of Roma
    EU NETWORK OF INDEPENDENT EXPERTS ON SOCIAL INCLUSION PROMOTING THE SOCIAL INCLUSION OF ROMA HUGH FRAZER AND ERIC MARLIER (NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND MAYNOOTH, CEPS/INSTEAD) DECEMBER 2011 SYNTHESIS REPORT On behalf of the Disclaimer: This report reflects the views of its authors European Commission and these are not necessarily those of either the DG Employment, Social Affairs European Commission or the Member States. and Inclusion The original language of the report is English. EU NETWORK OF INDEPENDENT EXPERTS ON SOCIAL INCLUSION PROMOTING THE SOCIAL INCLUSION OF ROMA HUGH FRAZER AND ERIC MARLIER (NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND MAYNOOTH, CEPS/INSTEAD) DECEMBER 2011 SYNTHESIS REPORT Overview based on the national reports prepared by the EU Network of Independent Experts on Social Inclusion Disclaimer: This report reflects the views of its authors and these are not necessarily those of either the European Commission or the Member States. The original language of the report is English. On behalf of the European Commission DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion SYNTHESIS REPORT Contents Preface 3 Summary, conclusions and suggestions 4 A. Summary 4 A.1 Overview of the situation of the Roma in the European Union (EU) 4 A.2 Assessment of existing policy and governance frameworks and identification of key policy priorities to be addressed in national Roma integration strategies 6 B. Conclusions and suggestions 12 1. Overview of the Situation of the Roma in the EU 16 1.1 Roma population across the EU 16 1.2 Geographical variations within countries 20 1.3 Poverty and social exclusion of Roma 22 1.3.1 Income poverty and deprivation 23 1.3.2 Educational disadvantage 24 1.3.3 Employment disadvantage 27 1.3.4 Poor health 30 1.3.5 Inadequate housing and environment 32 1.3.6 Limited access to sport, recreation and culture 34 1.4 Widespread discrimination and racism 35 1.5 Gender discrimination 38 1.6 Extensive data gaps 39 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Roma and Sinti Under-Studied Victims of Nazism
    UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM CENTER FOR ADVANCED HOLOCAUST STUDIES Roma and Sinti Under-Studied Victims of Nazism Symposium Proceedings W A S H I N G T O N , D. C. Roma and Sinti Under-Studied Victims of Nazism Symposium Proceedings CENTER FOR ADVANCED HOLOCAUST STUDIES UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM 2002 The assertions, opinions, and conclusions in this occasional paper are those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Holocaust Memorial Council or of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Third printing, July 2004 Copyright © 2002 by Ian Hancock, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Michael Zimmermann, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Guenter Lewy, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Mark Biondich, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Denis Peschanski, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Viorel Achim, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by David M. Crowe, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Contents Foreword .....................................................................................................................................i Paul A. Shapiro and Robert M. Ehrenreich Romani Americans (“Gypsies”).......................................................................................................1 Ian
    [Show full text]
  • 21St Century Exclusion: Roma and Gypsy-Travellers in European
    Angus Bancroft (2005) Roma and Gypsy-Travellers in Europe: Modernity, Race, Space and Exclusion, Aldershot: Ashgate. Contents Chapter 1 Europe and its Internal Outsiders Chapter 2 Modernity, Space and the Outsider Chapter 3 The Gypsies Metamorphosed: Race, Racialization and Racial Action in Europe Chapter 4 Segregation of Roma and Gypsy-Travellers Chapter 5 The Law of the Land Chapter 6 A Panic in Perspective Chapter 7 Closed Spaces, Restricted Places Chapter 8 A ‘21st Century Racism’? Bibliography Index Chapter 1 Europe and its Internal Outsiders Introduction From the ‘forgotten Holocaust’ in the concentration camps of Nazi controlled Europe to the upsurge of racist violence that followed the fall of Communism and the naked hostility displayed towards them across the continent in the 21st Century, Europe has been a dangerous place for Roma and Gypsy-Travellers (‘Gypsies’). There are Roma and Gypsy-Travellers living in every country of Europe. They have been the object of persecution, and the subject of misrepresentation, for most of their history. They are amongst the most marginalized groups in European society, historically being on the receiving end of severe racism, social and economic disadvantage, and forced population displacement. Anti-Gypsy sentiment is present throughout Europe, in post-Communist countries such as Romania, in social democracies like Finland, in Britain, in France and so on. Opinion polls consistently show that they are held in lower esteem than other ethnic groups. Examples of these sentiments in action range from mob violence in Croatia to ‘no Travellers’ signs in pubs in Scotland. This book will examine the exclusion of Roma and Gypsy-Travellers in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • South-East Europe International Relations Quarterly
    INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS QUARTERLY, Vol. 5. No.1. (Spring 2014/1) ROMA COMMUNITIES IN SOUTHEAST EUROPE JÓZSEF-GYÖRGY FEKETE (Abstract) The aim of this paper is to present the Roma1 people and their status in Southeast Europe; since they are the largest and most heterogeneous ethnic minority of the region. We are focusing on the Post-Yugoslav countries, Albania, Romania and Bulgaria. Hungary is not integrated organically to the studied countries, however for the easier comparison; we took the data of the Hungarian Gypsies into the analysis. The Roma people are not a homogeneous community, the religion, the language and the historical background both could differentiate them. Some ethnic groups who are attached the Gypsies also wish to distinguish themselves from the Romanies. The phenomenon of "preferred identity" can be observed within the Roma communities, which means that they do not identify themselves as Roma to avoid discrimination; and because of the assimilation (linguistic, religious and cultural) and "social progress" (especially in the more educated social layer). The socio-economic inequalities are increasing among both the Roms and the rest of the population; and within the Roma population as well. There are people in each country who live under or fall below the poverty line; however this process is much more intense and more drastic amongst the Roma population. This paper also aims to shed the light on the current situation of the Romani people living in the Balkans. For the sake of the objective we found important to present the history of the Roma in each country. We carried out a comprehensive analysis of the Hungarian and foreign literature, therefore, to the maximum extent possible, we tried to get to know previous studies of those researchers as widely as possible the, who live in the countries concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Austria: Health System Review 2006
    Health Systems in Transition Vol. 8 No. 3 2006 Austria Health system review Maria M Hofmarcher • Herta M Rack European Editor: Annette Riesberg on Health Systems and Policies Health Systems in Transition Written by Maria M. Hofmarcher, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna, Austria Herta M. Rack, Federal Ministry of Health and Women, Vienna, Austria With the collaboration of Gerald Röhrling, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna, Austria Edited by Annette Riesberg, Department of Health Care Management, Technical University Berlin, Germany Austria: Health System Review 2006 The European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies is a partnership between the World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, the Governments of Belgium, Finland, Greece, Norway, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden, the Veneto Region of Italy, the European Investment Bank, the Open Society Institute, the World Bank, CRP-Santé Luxembourg, the London School of Economics and Political Science, and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. Keywords: DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE EVALUATION STUDIES FINANCING, HEALTH HEALTH CARE REFORM HEALTH SYSTEM PLANS – organization and administration AUSTRIA © World Health Organization 2006, on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies All rights reserved. The European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full. Please address requests about this to: Publications WHO Regional Office for Europe Scherfigsvej 8 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Alternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for permission to quote or translate, on the WHO/Europe web site at http://www.euro.who.int/PubRequest The views expressed by authors or editors do not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policies of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies or any of its partners.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court Northern District Of
    Case 3:07-cv-06076-SI Document 1 Filed 12/03/2007 Page 1 of 24 1 DANIEL A. HOROWITZ State Bar No. 92400 Attorney at Law 2 P.O. Box 1547 3 Lafayette, California 94549 4 [email protected] 5 6 Attorney for Plaintiff 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 MICHAEL SAVAGE, 15 No. 16 3:07-cv-06076-JCS Plaintiff, 17 18 vs. 19 Council on American-Islamic 20 Relations, Inc. and Does 1-100 21 22 Defendants. _____________________________/ 23 24 25 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES 26 27 28 Case 3:07-cv-06076-SI Document 1 Filed 12/03/2007 Page 2 of 24 1 FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION 2 (Copyright Infringement) 3 4 JURISDICTION 5 1. 6 Michael Savage is the radio show star of “The Michael Savage Show”. “Michael 7 Savage”. Michael Savage is the owner of copyright interests in his show, “The Michael 8 Savage Show” also known as “The Savage Nation”. Savage broadcasts and creates his 9 content in the Northern District of California with his radio station located in San 10 Francisco, California. The content infringed upon was created in this district and 11 broadcast from this district. This cause of action arises from federal statute. 12 2. 13 14 “The Savage Nation” is a nationally syndicated radio show that reaches over eight 15 million listeners per week. Related to that show is the website www.MichaelSavage.com 16 which receives 2.3 million page views per month. The radio show originates in San 17 Francisco, California.
    [Show full text]
  • How Regional Distinctions in Educational and Labour Market
    Bacher et al. J Labour Market Res (2017) 51:4 DOI 10.1186/s12651-017-0232-6 Journal for Labour Market Research ORIGINAL ARTICLE Open Access Small diferences matter: how regional distinctions in educational and labour market policy account for heterogeneity in NEET rates Johann Bacher1*, Christina Koblbauer1, Heinz Leitgöb2 and Dennis Tamesberger3 Abstract Labour market and education policy makers and researchers are increasingly focusing on the NEET indicator as a sup- plement to the youth unemployment rate. Analyses of factors infuencing NEET have concentrated primarily on indi- vidual characteristics such as gender and migration background on one hand, and on macro-level factors of nations such as economic growth and minimum wage regulations on the other. However, nations are not homogenous, especially when a country is divided into several federal states, as is the case with Austria. This article aims to analyse regional diferences within Austria. In order to explain the diferences, we defne a multilevel model that contains four contextual factors: the importance of upper secondary education; the importance of dual education; vacant jobs; and expenditures for active labour market policy. Because the institutional level addresses diferent age groups, the analy- sis was split into two age groups: 15–19 and 20–24 years. The results have shown that, besides the social structure of the population, contextual factors like the upper secondary education, the dual education, vacant jobs, and expen- ditures for active labour market policy are also relevant for explaining regional diferences in the NEET rates. But one main insight was that the impact of the contextual factors varies between diferent social groups.
    [Show full text]