Note on Issues of EU Environmental Law and Transposition Into UK Domestic Law

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Note on Issues of EU Environmental Law and Transposition Into UK Domestic Law Note on Issues of EU Environmental Law and Transposition into UK Domestic law Analysis of the Draft Directive 1. Essentially, the aim of the Draft Directive in question (no 11002/07) is to ensure the provision of criminal offences, carrying sufficient sanctions, in the national criminal law of member states. These offences would criminalise breaches of certain provisions of EU environmental law. This is made clear in its Article 1, which reads: “This Directive establishes measures relating to criminal law in order to protect the environment more effectively”. 2. The context of this Draft Directive (and the consultation process to which this note is directed towards) is the view that the EU is entitled to specify that breaches of environmental law should be dealt by member states with as criminal offences. The ‘guidance’ provided cites the recent ECJ decision in the ‘Ship-Source’; Commission v Council case (C440/05) as authority for this principle. I would also draw attention to, as part of this contextual background, the ECJ decision of Commission v Council (C 176/03). 3. The Draft Directive only requires the existence of criminal law provisions in respect of 9 types of environmentally-harmful conduct (Article 3). In summary, the specified conduct pertains to: a. [offence deleted from Draft Directive] b. Release of substances or ionising radiation which causes or is likely to cause death/injury/damage to environment c. Dealings with waste which causes or is likely to cause death/injury/damage to environment d. Operation of a plant dealing with dangerous activities/substances which causes or is likely to cause death/injury/damage to environment outside of the plant e. Illegal shipment of waste for profit/commercial purposes which causes or is likely to cause death/injury/damage to environment 1 f. Dealings with nuclear/radioactive materials which causes or is likely to cause death/injury/damage to environment g. Intentional dealings with protected wild fauna or flora; and intentional damaging or killing of such species for commercial purposes/habitually, except when within a permitted professional activity h. Significant deterioration of a protected habitat i. Trade/use of ozone-depleting substances j. Causing of noise which causes or is likely to cause death/injury/damage to environment 4. As to the criminal liability which would be required to attach to the above conduct, I would suggest that the Draft Directive’s requirements are fivefold: a. That criminal liability should attach when the conduct represents a breach of EU law (being thereby ‘unlawful’ for the purposes of the Directive) (Article 3) b. That criminal liability should attach when the conduct was committed either intentionally or with at least serious negligence, unless specified otherwise (Article 3) c. That this criminal liability should be extended to persons who aid, abet and incite the offences listed in Article 3 (Article 4) d. That this criminal liability should be extended to legal persons (Article 6) e. That this criminal liability on the part of individuals and legal persons should be met with sanctions which are at least of the level specified in the Directive, and which are “effective, proportionate and dissuasive” (Article 5 & 7). 5. It must be borne in mind that the Directive only requires the criminalisation of ‘unlawful’ conduct, i.e. conduct which is a breach of EU environmental law. The Draft Directive includes an annexe of the Directives and Regulations pertaining to EU environmental law, breach of which will render conduct ‘unlawful’ for the purposes of the Directive. 6. I will now, for each of the 9 types of conduct specified in Article 3, analyse the requirements of the Draft Directive and the existing content of the domestic law. Discharge of substances into the air 2 Review of the Requirements of the Draft Directive 7. As per Article 3(b), the Draft Directive requires the criminalisation of the discharge of substances into the air which might cause death/serious injury/damage to the environment when such discharges are also a breach of EU Law. The EU law in question is said to be based upon the following directives (as listed in Annexe II): a. 70/220 (emissions from engines) b. 72/306 (emissions from engines) c. 77/537 (emissions from engines) d. 84/360 (emissions from industrial plants) e. 94/63 (emissions from storage of petrol) f. 96/61 (integrated pollution prevention and control) g. 97/67 (emissions from engines) h. 99/13 (emissions from solvents) i. 2000/53 (end-of-life vehicles) j. 2001/80 (emissions from industrial plants) k. 2003/87 (greenhouse gas emission allowance trading) l. 2005/55 (emissions from engines) m. 2005/78 (emissions from engines) Review of the content of UK law on these issues 8. Three separate schemes are in place in UK law to deal with the discharge of problematic substances into the air: a. The Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Scheme (hereafter ‘IPPC’ scheme) b. Various statutes and statutory instruments dealing with air quality generally; c. And various instruments dealing with the particular sources of emissions highlighted in the aforementioned directives. 9. As to IPPC, this scheme is provided for by the Pollution Prevention and Control Regulations 2000 (SI 2000/1973) which were made under the Pollution Prevention and Control Act 1999, and was designed to implement Directive 96/61. The scheme essentially regulates certain industrial activities which pose a potential threat to the environment and sets up a permit system. For this purpose, ‘environmental pollution’ is 3 defined in s1(2) as pollution of the air, water or land which may give rise to any harm; and ‘harm’ is defined in s1(3) as including harm to the health of human beings, or other living organisms, harm to the quality of the environment as a whole or to the quality of the air, water or land and other impairment/interference with the ecological systems; offence to the senses of human beings; damage to property; and the impairment of or inference with amenities of other legitimate uses of the environment. Thus, it is obvious that processes which could possibly result in emissions into the air which are harmful to the environment will be controlled by the IPPC Scheme. It is also of note that Directives 96/61, 94/63, 99/13, 2000/53 and 2001/80 are all relevant directives for the purposes of Schedule 1 PPCA 19991. 10. The important aspect of this scheme for present purposes is that it does make use of criminal law sanctions. Regulation 32 of the PPC Regulations provides for a number of criminal offences for breaches of the requirements of the legislation (SI 2000/1973). As to sentencing, it seems that all of these offences can be tried summarily or on indictment. The offences listed in Reg 32(1)(a),(b),(d) and (i) when tried summarily can be subject to a fine not exceeding £50,000 or to a term of imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or both and when tried on indictment to a fine or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years or both (Reg 32(2); as amended by s105 Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005). The offences listed in Reg 32(1)(c) and (e) – (h) when tried summarily can be subject to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum2 and when tried on indictment to a fine or a to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or both (Reg 32(3)). 11. As to various statutory authorities dealing with the quality of air, one first turns to the Clean Air Act 1993. This makes provision, inter alia, for the control of smoke from industrial and domestic premises via a smoke control order issued under s18(1) and the control of the emission of dark smoke. The emission of dark smoke is an offence under s1(1) and (2) CAA 1993; an offender being liable, on summary conviction, to a fine either 1 See the Pollution Prevention and Control (Designation of Directives)(England and Wales) Order 2007; SI 2007/2247, The Pollution Prevention and Control (Designation of Council Directives on Large Combustion Plants, Incineration of Waste and National Emission Ceilings) Order 2002, 2002/2528 etc 2 Statutory maximum for fines is currently set at £5,000 4 of level 33 (for s1(1) offence) or level 54 (for s1(2) offence) on the standard scale. It is also an offence to breach a smoke control order issued under s20(4) CAA 1993: an offender being liable, on summary conviction, to a fine of level 3 on the standard scale. Furthermore, the Environment Act 1995 provided power to prescribe standards as to air quality by way of regulations (ss87 and 91): see Air Quality (England) Regulations 2000 (SI 2000/928) and Air Quality Limit Values Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/2121) (note that the relevant standards often represent a transposition of the requirements of EU directives). 12. As to the additional instruments which deal with specific types of emissions into the air, I will deal with the following examples: d. As to emissions from motor vehicle engines, see the Motor Vehicles (Type Approval) Regulations 1980 and later amending regulations and the Road Vehicle (Construction and Use) Regulations. As to Directives 2005/55 and 2005/78 see Motor Vehicle (EC type approval)(Amendment No 4) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/2816). e. As to emissions from solvents, see: Pollution Prevention and Control (England and Wales) Regulations 2000; Solvent Emissions (England and Wales) Regulations 2003; Solvent Emissions (Scotland) Regulations 2004; Solvent Emissions (Northern Ireland) Regulations 2004 and Volatile Organic Compounds in Paints, Varnishes and Vehicle refinishing products regulations 2005 f.
Recommended publications
  • Handbook on Environmental Law in Uganda
    HANDBOOK ON ENVIRONMENTAL LAW IN UGANDA Editors: Kenneth Kakuru Volume I Irene Ssekyana HANDBOOK ON ENVIRONMENTAL LAW IN UGANDA Volume I If we all did little, we would do much Second Edition February 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................................... v Forward ........................................................................................................................................................................vi Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................... viii CHAPTER ONE ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION TO ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ..................................................................................................... 1 1.1 A Brief History of Environmental Law ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Religious, Cultural and historical roots .................................................................................................. 1 1.1.2 The Green Revolution ............................................................................................................................ 2 1.1.3 Environmental Law in the United States of America
    [Show full text]
  • Water Industry Act 1991
    Page 1 Water Industry Act 1991 1 of 6 DOCUMENTS: UK Parliament Acts/W/WA-WG/Water Industry Act 1991 (1991 c 56)/Part III Water Supply (ss 37-93)/39 Procedure for regulations under section 38 39 Procedure for regulations under section 38 [(A1) The Secretary of State may make regulations under section 38 above-- (a) on an application by the Authority, in accordance with subsections (1) to (3) below; or (b) otherwise than on such an application, in accordance with subsections (4) to (8) below.] (1) [Where the Authority has made to the Secretary of State a written application complying with sub- section (2) below, the Secretary of State may make regulations under section 38 above if--] [(b) the Secretary of State is satisfied that a copy of the application has been served by [the Au- thority]-- (i) on every water undertaker specified in the application; . (ii) on persons or bodies appearing to the Secretary of State to be representative of persons likely to be affected by the regulations; [(iii) on the Council; and (iv) on such other persons or bodies as the Secretary of State may consider appropriate;]] (c) such period as the Secretary of State considers appropriate has been allowed for the making-- (i) by [the Authority]; and (ii) by any affected water undertaker [or person or body on whom a copy of the application has been served under paragraph [(b)] above], of representations or objections with respect to [the Authority's] proposals and any modifications pro- posed by the Secretary of State; and (d) the Secretary of State has considered [the summary mentioned in subsection (2)(bb) below,] [the Authority's] reasons for [its] proposals and every representation or objection which has been duly made with respect to those proposals, or any proposed modifications of those proposals, and has not been withdrawn.
    [Show full text]
  • Centre for Law, Economics and Society Research Paper Series: 1/2019
    Centre for Law, Economics and Society Research Paper Series: 1/2019 Are Economists Kings? Economic Evidence and Discretionary Assessments at the UK Utility Regulatory Agencies Despoina Mantzari Centre for Law, Economics and Society CLES Faculty of Laws, UCL Director: Professor Ioannis Lianos CLES Research Paper Series 1/2019 Are Economists Kings? Economic Evidence and Discretionary Assessments at the UK Utility Regulatory Agencies Despoina Mantzari June 2019 Centre for Law, Economics and Society (CLES) Faculty of Laws, UCL London, WC1H 0EG The CLES Research Paper Series can be found at www.ucl.ac.uk/cles/research-papers Pre-published version of: Despoina Mantzari, ‘Are Economists Kings? Economic Evidence and Discretionary Assessments at the UK Utility Regulatory Agencies’, Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, DOI: 10.1093/jaenfo/jnaa007 All rights reserved. No part of this paper may be reproduced in any form without permission of the author ISBN 978-1-910801-25-3 © Despoina Mantzari 2019 Centre for Law, Economics and Society Faculty of Laws, UCL London, WC1H 0EG United Kingdom ARE ECONOMISTS KINGS? ECONOMIC EVIDENCE AND DISCRETIONARY ASSESSMENTS AT THE UK UTILITY REGULATORY AGENCIES Despoina Mantzari* * Lecturer in Competition Law and Policy, University College London, Faculty of Laws. Email: [email protected]. I thank Ioannis Lianos, Diamond Ashiagbor, Stephen Littlechild, Andriani Kalintiri, Maria Ioannidou, the two anonymous reviewers, as well as participants at the IALS 2018 Lunchtime seminar series, the UCL Laws 2019 Lunchtime Research Seminars, the Annual Meeting of Law and Society 2018, the UK IVR conference 2017 (where an early draft of this paper received the ‘best early career paper prize’) as well as stakeholders of the Essential Services Access Network (ESAN) and policymakers at UK Office for Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem) for helpful comments and discussions on earlier versions of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • General Scheme of Delegation to Officers
    PART 3 3.2 SCHEME OF DELEGATION TO OFFICERS 1 Revised as at Council 22/10/2020 INDEX Page No. INTRODUCTION AND POWERS TO THE CHIEF 3 EXECUTIVE AND ALL DIRECTORS CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S 11 RESOURCES 17 SOCIAL CARE, HEALTH AND HOUSING 27 REGENERATION 61 TECHNICAL SERVICES 67 EDUCATION AND CHILDREN’S SERVICES 73 2 Revised as at Council 22/10/2020 1. INTRODUCTION This Scheme of Delegation is maintained under Section 100G of the Local Government Act 1972 and lists the functions that have been delegated to particular officers by either the Council or the Executive Board. These functions are delegated to officers by the Council under Sections 101 and 151 of the Local Government Act 1972 and by the Executive Board under Section 15 of the Local Government Act 2000. All Directors are authorised to make arrangements for the proper administration of the functions falling within their responsibility. 1.1 The officers described in this Scheme may authorise officers in their department/service area to exercise on their behalf, functions delegated to them. Any decisions taken under this authority shall remain the responsibility of the officer described in this Scheme and must be taken in the name of that officer, who shall remain accountable and responsible for such decisions. Each department shall maintain a record of these further delegations. 1.2 The Scheme delegates powers and duties within broad functional descriptions and includes powers and duties under all legislation present and future within those descriptions. Any reference to a specific statute includes any statutory extension or modification or re-enactment of such statute and any regulations, orders or bylaws made there under.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Interpretation of Legal Requirements Under Part IV, Environment Act 1995
    Guidance on Local Authority Air quality Management Interpretation of Legal Requirements 2. Interpretation of Legal Requirements under Part IV, Environment Act 1995 The purpose of this Chapter is to detail the main requirements of Part IV of the Environment Act 1995 with particular reference to the implications for local authorities to develop air quality management plans. The Chapter will expand on the details of the Act and provide further guidance on practical issues relating to assessing achievement of standards. EC and UK Legislation on Air Quality The EC Council of ministers has recently adopted a number of directives central to European air and pollution policy. The Ambient Air Quality Assessment and Management Directive establishes a framework under which the community will agree air quality limit or guide values for specified pollutants in a series of “daughter directives”. These will supersede existing air quality legislation. Under this framework directive, Member States will have to monitor levels of these pollutants and draw up and implement reduction plans for those areas in which the limit values are being or are likely to be breached. The Environment Act 1995 Part IV and the UK National Air Quality Strategy provide the principal means of carrying out the UK’s commitments under this Directive. The Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Directive requires Member States to ensure that major industrial installations receive permits based on the Best Available Techniques for pollution control subject to technical and economic feasibility. The Integrated Pollution Control strategy in the Environmental Protection Act 1990 will form the basis of the UK implementation of this Directive.
    [Show full text]
  • Scheme of Delegated Powers
    Part 3 Responsibility of Functions – Scheme of Delegated Powers RESPONSIBILITY FOR FUNCTIONS DELEGATED POWERS GENERAL The Local Authorities (Functions and Responsibilities) (England) Regulations 2000 (as amended) give effect to section 13 of the Local Government Act 2000 by specifying: - (a) which functions are not to be the responsibility of the Executive (Cabinet); as specified in Schedule 1 to the Local Authorities (Functions and Responsibilities) (England) Regulations 2000 and as detailed in the Appendix to this part of the Constitution. (b) functions which may (but need not) be the responsibility of the Executive (Cabinet) (local choice functions); (c) which are to some extent the responsibility of the Executive. All other functions not so specified are to be the responsibility of the Executive. Every decision of the Cabinet, a Portfolio Holder, Committee, Sub-Committee, Working Party or Officer under delegated powers shall comply with the Council’s Constitution and in particular with its Budget and Policy Framework, Council Procedure Rules, Financial Procedure Rules and Procurement Procedure Rules and any expenditure involved is subject to such compliance. 1. RESPONSIBILITY FOR LOCAL CHOICE FUNCTIONS Local Choice functions are those, which may (but need not) be the responsibility of the Cabinet. Schedule 1 of Part 3 of the Constitution details the responsibility for those local choice functions as set out in Schedule 2 to the Local Authorities (Functions and Responsibilities) (England) Regulations 2000, as determined by the Council. 2. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COUNCIL (NON-EXECUTIVE) FUNCTIONS The roles and responsibilities of full Council are set out in Article 4 of the Constitution. The specific functions set out in Schedule 1 to the Local Authorities (Functions and Responsibilities) (England) Regulations 2000 which are retained for determination by full Council are set out in Schedule 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Environment Act 1995 (Contaminated Land Commencement and Saving Provision) (Wales) Order 2001
    LC299 Cynulliad Cenedlaethol Cymru The National Assembly for Wales ADRODDIAD GAN Y PWYLLGOR DEDDFAU LEGISLATION COMMITTEE REPORT The Environment Act 1995 (Contaminated Land Commencement and Saving Provision) (Wales) Order 2001 Background This Order provides for the commencement, on 1 July 2001, of certain provisions of the Environment Act 1995 relating to contaminated land. The commenced provisions make amendments to the Environmental Protection Act 1990. A commencement and saving order to the same effect as the present order was made in respect of England on 2 February 2000, with the relevant provisions of the 1995 Act being commenced on 1 April 2000. Standing Order 11.5 No points have been identified as matters in respect of which the Committee needs to formally invite the Assembly to pay special attention under SO 11.5. General Observations Whilst it has been concluded that formal reporting under SO 11.5 is not warranted, attention is drawn to the following matters. Explanatory Note The Statutory Instrument Handbook indicates that where an Act is brought into force by more than one commencement order, the second and subsequent orders should have a note, after the Explanatory Note, listing the provisions brought into force by earlier orders. The Handbook goes on to indicate, however, that where this is impracticable, such as where listing a large number of earlier orders would result in unacceptable delay, a list of the provisions brought into force by earlier orders should be made available to enquirers, and a statement of this included after the Explanatory Note. The Handbook further indicates that where the order brings the last remaining provisions of an Act into force, this should be stated in the Explanatory Note.
    [Show full text]
  • THE DEVELOPMENT of the WATER INDUSTRY in ENGLAND and WALES Cover Photograph: Ryburn Dam, Yorkshire
    THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE WATER INDUSTRY IN ENGLAND AND WALES Cover photograph: Ryburn Dam, Yorkshire. Courtesy of Yorkshire Water Services Limited. This document sets out our understanding of the development of, and of some of the legal provisions affecting, the water industry in England and Wales. Every reasonable effort has been made to make the information and any commentary accurate and up to date, but no responsibility for its accuracy and correctness, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed by the Office of Water Services. The information and commentary does not, and is not intended to, amount to legal advice to any person, nor is it a substitute for the relevant legal provision. Anyone in doubt about how they may be affected by any of the legal provisions referred to in the document should seek legal advice. CONTENTS 1. OVERVIEW 1 1.1 GOVERNMENT POLICY 1 1.2 EARLY CONSOLIDATION 1 1.3 RESTRUCTURING 2 1.4 PRIVATISATION 3 1.5 THE INDUSTRY TODAY 3 2. INITIAL CO-ORDINATION OF WATER RESOURCES IN ENGLAND & WALES 5 2.1 INTRODUCTION 5 2.1.1 Water supply 5 2.1.2 Sewerage & sewage disposal 6 2.1.3 Other interests in water resources 7 2.2 WATER RESOURCES ACT 1963 8 2.2.1 Background 8 2.2.2 River Authorities 8 2.2.3 Water Resources Board 9 2.2.4 Central government 9 2.3 MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES UNDER THE 1963 ACT 10 2.4 SERVICE DELIVERY 11 2.5 THE NEED FOR CHANGE 11 3. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE WATER AUTHORITIES 12 3.1 INTRODUCTION 12 3.2 WATER ACT 1973 12 3.2.1 Policy proposals 12 3.2.2 Functions of the water authorities 15 3.2.3 Financial arrangements 16 3.2.4 Constitution of the water authorities 16 3.2.5 Board structure 17 3.2.6 Role of central government 18 3.2.7 National Water Council 19 3.2.8 Household water bills 19 3.2.9 Statutory water companies 20 3.2.10 Pollution control 20 3.3 THE POST 1974 OPERATING ENVIRONMENT 22 3.3.1 Access to finance 22 3.3.2 Environmental performance 26 3.4 WATER ACT 1983 27 3.4.1 Constitutional changes 27 3.4.2 Financial changes 28 3.5 THE NEED FOR CHANGE 28 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Protection Act 1990: Part 2A
    www.defra.gov.uk Environmental Protection Act 1990: Part 2A Contaminated Land Statutory Guidance April 2012 © Crown copyright 2012 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ doc/open-government-licence/ or e-mail: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This document/publication is also available on the Government website at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/contaminated-land-statutory-guidance Any enquiries regarding this document/publication should be sent to us at: [email protected] This publication is available for download at www.official-documents.gov.uk. Printed in the UK for The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office 04/12 PB13735 Contents Ministerial Foreword ...........................................................................................................................2 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................3 Section 1: Objectives of the Part 2A regime ......................................................................................5 Section 2: Local authority inspection duties .......................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Water Industry Act 1991
    Water Industry Act 1991 1991 CHAPTER 56 An Act to consolidate enactments relating to the supply of water and the provision of sewerage services, with amendments to give effect to recommendations of the Law Commission [25th July 1991] BE IT ENACTED by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:– Part I Preliminary . NOTES Amendment Repealed by the Water Act 2003, ss 34(4), 101(2), Sch 9, Pt 2. Date in force: 1 April 2006: see SI 2005/2714, art 4(a), (g)(i); for savings see art 5(1), Schedule, para 8 thereto. 1 . NOTES Amendment Repealed by the Water Act 2003, ss 34(4), 101(2), Sch 9, Pt 2. Date in force: 1 April 2006: see SI 2005/2714, art 4(a), (g)(i); for savings see art 5(1), Schedule, para 8 thereto. [Water Services Regulation Authority] NOTES Amendment Inserted by virtue of the Water Act 2003, s 34(1). Date in force: 1 April 2006: see SI 2005/2714, art 4(a); for transitional provisions see art 5(1), Schedule, para 8 thereto. [1A Water Services Regulation Authority] [(1) There shall be a body corporate to be known as the Water Services Regulation Authority (in this Act referred to as “the Authority”) for the purpose of carrying out the functions conferred on or transferred to it by this Act or under or by virtue of any other enactment.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Bill Explanatory Notes
    ENVIRONMENT BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES What these notes do These Explanatory Notes relate to the Environment Bill as introduced in the House of Commons on 30 January 2020 (Bill 9). • These Explanatory Notes have been prepared by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) in order to assist the reader of the Bill and to help inform debate on it. They do not form part of the Bill and have not been endorsed by Parliament. • These Explanatory Notes explain what each part of the Bill will mean in practice; provide background information on the development of policy; and provide additional information on how the Bill will affect existing legislation in this area. • These Explanatory Notes might best be read alongside the Bill. They are not, and are not intended to be, a comprehensive description of the Bill. Bill 9–EN 58/1 Table of Contents Subject Page of these Notes Overview of the Bill 9 Policy background 13 Exiting the European Union (EU) 13 Part 1: Environmental Governance 13 Part 2: Environmental Governance: Northern Ireland 14 Part 3: Waste and Resource Efficiency 15 Part 4: Air Quality and Environmental Recall 16 Part 5: Water 17 Part 6: Nature and Biodiversity 18 Part 7: Conservation Covenants 19 Part 8: Miscellaneous and General Provisions 19 Legal background 20 Territorial extent and application 21 Commentary on provisions of Bill 22 Part 1: Environmental Governance 22 Chapter 1: Improving the natural environment 22 Clause 1: Environmental targets 22 Clause 2: Environmental targets: particulate matter 23 Clause 3:
    [Show full text]
  • UK Government's Evidence to the Commission on Devolution in Wales Part II
    UK Government’s Evidence to the Commission on Devolution in Wales Part II: The Welsh Devolution Settlement UK Government’s Evidence to the Commission on Devolution in Wales Part II: The Welsh Devolution Settlement Contents 1. Introduction Page 3 2. Agriculture, Forestry, Animals, Plants and Rural Page 16 Development 3. Ancient Monuments and Historic Buildings Page 20 4. Culture Page 20 5. Economic Development Page 24 6. Education and Training Page 35 7. Environment Page 40 8. Fire, Rescue Services and Fire Safety Page 46 9. Food Page 47 10. Health and Health Services Page 48 11. Highways and Transport Page 56 12. Housing Page 62 13. Justice Page 63 14. Local Government Page 71 15. National Assembly for Wales Page 73 16. Public Administration Page 75 17. Security and Policing Page 80 18. Social Welfare Page 88 1 19. Sport and Recreation Page 95 20. Tourism Page 96 21. Town and Country Planning Page 97 22. Water and Flood Defence Page 103 23. Welsh Language Page 113 2 1. Introduction 1.1 The UK Government welcomes the opportunity to provide evidence to Part II of the Silk Commission’s work. 1.2 We believe in devolution, and have demonstrated a strong commitment to taking devolution forward because it gives people choice and a real say over their own affairs. The decentralisation of power is one of our core aims, and we believe firmly that there are benefits in taking decisions at local level within a strong United Kingdom. 1.3 Devolution in the United Kingdom is asymmetric, reflecting the different circumstances, history and institutions of each nation within the UK.
    [Show full text]