Chhattisgarh Road Development Corporation Limited
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Chhattisgarh Road Development Corporation Limited 3.d Floor, sirpur Bhawan Campus,Behind Akashwanicvil Lines, RaiPu (c.G.) 492001 Website : www.cgrdcji, enail ID : [email protected] Ph. No. 0Zl1 :4043391 Fax No.On14o33242 CIN : U45200CT2014SGC001560 ( .9. 2020 No. : Qog /ccRDc/2020 Raiprr, Dated: 3 / | / To The DiYisional foreet officer Forest Division, Suraipur Subr Diversion of 20.236 ha of Forest land favour of Chhattiegarh Road Development Corpotation ltd. Raiput for widening of existing road from Tara-Premnagar- Ramanujnagar Road in Suraipur forest divisiort Suraipur district in the state of Chhattisgarh-regarding. Refr 1. MoEF regional office letter no.FC:|ACH'125/2079-NGP/6000 date 18.12.2019 2. Yow letter no. rlT.fil1o9 guraipw date d 09.07.2020 -000-- The Pointwise reply to the obsevations made vide reference no. 1 is as followsi 1. In online submitted part-I non-forest area involved in Proposal is 58.278 Ha. Dudng initial online submissiory it was by mistak, entered 0. We tried to corect it now but it cannot be corrected at this stage. We also con.sulted to MoEF&CC- NIC - Delhi in this regard by email. They replied that, once recommended by Divisiory Circle, Nodal officer, we cannot change in area of the proposal. (For ready reference email print is attached).Thus, it requested to do the needful in this regard please. The Further total time for which diversir is proPosed is "forever", but in online proposal only numeric can be entered, so it is entered as 99 years. Accordingly the correction has been done. CAnhexqt'(- I ) 2. Cost benefit ailaysis has been revised as per MoE&CC guide line dated 01.08.2017 A Copy of CBA is hereby attached for ready reference. CAnnexute-lA) 3. The Proposal is for widening and upgradation of existing road. No new alianmen/Re-alianment/Bye-Passes have been proposed in forest land, only existing road is being widened. 4. No re-alianrnent have been proposed is area, hence no need to bifurcatiofi area calculation. Tabular form for patch wise length and breath has already been submitted with proPosal. 5. CA land idenfied is under the jurisdiction forest divi$ion Kathghora (C.G.) which falls under Kendai forest range, the comPartment No. is OA 719. The CA land proposed is fully administrated ard managed by state forest departrnent (Forest Division Kathghora) copy o{ supporting letters is hereby attached for ready reference. LAnner<qY'. -2) 6. CA land proposed is orange area of forest dePartment having very less density. Near by village population passes through this area currently Once comPensatory afforetattion has been done with ProPer fencing etc, no one will pass through this area. Also, there is no encroachment is proposedCA land area 7. Detafu of cross drainage structures like bridges, ninor. bridges, culverts are being attached herewith for ready reference. 10 Nos HPC of 1200 mm dia and 03 Nos of box culverts have been proposed for corshuction in {orest area. Qln ne xq re- 3 ) 8. Approximately 98100 man days of un skilled/semi skilled nature on temPorary basis and around 48 persoru of skilled nature, on Permanent basis will be generated during consfuction period of 16 months 9. An undertaking in accordance with MoEF8TCC guideJires dated 07 01 2013 is given and attached herewith for ready reference. CAnnarute-r+) ?-l Gmail Chhattlsgarh Road Dev€lopm6nt Corporation <[email protected]> Regarding Proposal No FPICG/ROAD I24Tg7 th}lt - Entry of non_forest tand in Forest Glearance Proposar for widening of Existing Roid from Tara premnagar to Ramanujnagar Road in Surajpur District of Chhattiigarh state, 5 messages Chhattisgarh Road D6velopment <[email protected]> Conorafl on fue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2.24 pM To: [email protected], [email protected] Sir PFA! The lettea for forest clearance. : .. I nanKtng you, Chhattisgarh Road Developmenl Corporation Ltd, 3rd tloor, Sirpur Bhawan Campus, Civil Llnes, Ralpur Lt. 173 dt, 28.01.2020.PDF 76K Chhattls-garh Road Devetopment Corporation <[email protected]> Tue, Jan 28,2020 at4:01 pM To: "P[/ CGRDC Anbikapur (Office),, <cgrdc.pml 1@gm;it.co;-> E Ltl73 dt. 28.01.2020.PDF [email protected] <anil.kumaa@n jc.in> Tue, Jan 28,2020 at 10:31 pM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Dear Vikas Kindly do needfuland inform th€ concemed also. AnilNlC ----*- Forwarded message ------ From: Chhattisgarh Road Development Corporation <[email protected]> Dale:28 Jan 2020 14:24 Subjeclr Regarding Proposal No FPICG/ROAD/2479712017 - Entry of non-forest lanct in Forest clearance prop'osal forWidening of Existing Road from Tar€ Premnagarto Ramanujnigar Road in Surajpur District of Chhattisgarh state, To: anil.kumar@nic. jn,[email protected] Disclaimer! This e-mail and its attachments may contain officiar Indran covernment informaflon. If you are not Uie intended rccipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any dissemination or use of this informatlon by person a other than the intended recipient is'unadthqrized. The responsibility lies with the recipient to check this emajl and any attachment for the presence of vlruses. tsl Lt.'173 dt. 28.01.2020.P0F 76K e-'t- vikas banchariya <[email protected]> Wed, Jan 29,2020 al11124 AM To: [email protected] cc: Mkash <[email protected]>, [email protected], anil <[email protected]> Dear Sir, After rscommendation of DFO there is no option available ofedit land size in PARIVESH. Vikas Kumar NIC Moefcc JOGENDRA TRIVEDI <jogs.trivedi8231 @gmail.com> Wed. Jan 29. 2020 at 11:48 AIV To: Irronitoring Cell <[email protected]>, [email protected] Ccr GAURAV CHAMOLI <[email protected]>, ranjanraj03feb <[email protected]>, anil kumar <[email protected]> Dear Sir/Madam, As peryour trailing maif the proposal no. FP/CG/RoAD|24797l2o17 has akeady been recommended by Division, Circle, Nodal officer, therefore you will not be able made any change in area of this proposal. On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 11:40, Monitoring Cell <[email protected]> wrotel Dear sir, Klndly do the needful. From: 'Chhattis'garh Road Development Corporation" <[email protected]> To: "anil kumar'.<[email protected]>, [email protected] Sent Tuesday, January 2a,2020 2124109 PM Subjoct: Regarding PrcposalNo FP|CG/ROAD/2479712017 - Entry ot non-forest land in Forest Clearance Proposalfof Widening of Existing Road from Tara Premnagarto Ramanujnagar Road in Suralpuf District of Chhattisgarh dtate, riants a negaras Jogendra Trivedi NlC, N4oEFCC Afiq.x'^42-14 P-l Cost Benefit Analvsis for Diversion of Forest Land Name of Proiect: Widening and Up-gradation to 2-lane with Hard shoulders lrom Tara to Ramanujnagar (Km 0.OOO to 50.242 km) of Tara-Premnagar-Ramanujnagar Road in Surajpur District in the State of Chhattisgarh Nature of Proposal: Diversion of 20.236 ha. of Forest Land. Total Length of lhe proiect road: 50.242 KM Number of Dlstricts through which proiect road traYerses: 01 No. i.e Surajpur Total length of the project road along the ProtectedlReserve Forest: Under Forest Division, Surajpur, Districl Surajpur (Chhattisgarh) = 14.454 Kms Purposer The Cost Beneflt Analysis is being undertaken as the proposed diversion of forest land being affected due ta widening and up-gradation of existing road for above said project is more than 20 Ha. cost Benefit Analysis for ForeEt Land Diversion - 2017 (As per guidelines dated-11.08.2017 issued by M1EF&CC, Govt of lndia, New Delhi) TablE-A: Cases undsf whlch a cost"benstit analysis for forest diversion are required Applicable/ not Remarkg S.No NaturE of Proposal appllcablo proposals be 1 All catego es of proPosals Not applicable These may involving forest land upto 20 considefed on a case to case hectarcs in plains and upto 5 basis and value judgement hectares in hills. 2 Proposals for defence installation Not applicable In view of naiional priority purpgges on oil prospecting accorded to these sectors, the ( prospecting only) proposals would be critically assessed to help ascenain that the utmost minimum foresl land is diverted for non-forest use. 3 Habitation, establishment of Nol applicable fhese ectivities being detrimental industris! units, tourist lodges o protection and conseryatlon of complex and other building orest, as a matter of policy, such construction. )roposals would be rarely )nt6rtained. All other proposals involving Applicable These are casgs where a cost- forest land more than 20 benefit analysis is necessary to heclares in plains and more than determine when diveding the 5 hectares in hills including forest land to nonjorest use in rcads, transmission lines, minor, the overall public interest. medium and m€jof ifrigation projects, hydro projects, mining activity railway lines, location specific inslallations like micro- wave slations auto repeater c€ntres TV towers elc. nrr-l A in the plain land measuting more than 20 Ha the proposal is tor div6r'slo-n of lorest Since r€pott ls applicable aroa for toad project, cost Denerll analysis Table'B: Estimation of Cost of forest diversion SNoT Paramstora li-]_iiiiiiF varue of ecosvstem flosystem services E diverc'lon o# t" ii'"'""r* services Oue to -of losses due to :3l,"#"' | amount rot "J:ji":be the net Presenr forests- NPV proposed forest cf forest shall I diverted lano alLre {NPV) of the forest land being I oroposed diversion Central tatiulated bv DFo ofiice ivertei as Prescribed bY I Suraiour is 1043000.00 Pe' Ha iovernment (MoEF&CC) I v;ry dens€ forest) I {for the Hence, the amount work€d oLl ,lote:ln case of National Parks, I is {PV shall be ten (10) times the I of Wildlife (20.238 Ha.