New Treatment Modalities for Neovascular Age-Related Macular

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Treatment Modalities for Neovascular Age-Related Macular REVIEW ARTICLE New Treatment Modalities for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Patricio G. Schlottmann, MD,* Arturo A. Alezzandrini, MD, PhD,† Marcelo Zas, MD, PhD,‡ Francisco J. Rodriguez, MD,§ José D. Luna, MD,¶ and Lihteh Wu, MD∥ Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) due to neovascular Abstract: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is considered one AMD (nAMD) is responsible for most AMD-related severe vi- of the main causes of severe vision loss in older adults. The neovascular 09/09/2020 on BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3GqhOzspyl8wzdGoAiDZ01F7vOf+c0L5VOYO2r67BVps= by https://journals.lww.com/apjoo from Downloaded sion loss. Anti‒vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) form (nAMD) is an advanced stage, which is responsible for the most se- agents, delivered intravitreally, block the angiogenic process, the Downloaded vere vision loss. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is at present growth of abnormal blood vessels in the eye, to prevent loss of the main factor that leads to the development of a neovascular membrane vision and, in some cases, improve vision.3 from and the increased leakage from the membrane to the retina. At present, https://journals.lww.com/apjoo Over the past decade, the only effective treatments that pre- anti-VEGF therapy is the only treatment that achieves vision gains in vented vision loss in most patients were anti-VEGF agents.4 These many patients and halts progression in most of them. VEGF blockade agents reduce the growth of new blood vessels from existing blood can be achieved with several molecules and various treatment regimens, vessels by blocking the activity of the essential positive regula- which have been studied with excellent results. Unfortunately, real-world tory factor, VEGF. The result of the action of the VEGF molecule by data has shown to be far less efficacious than clinical trials. This gap BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3GqhOzspyl8wzdGoAiDZ01F7vOf+c0L5VOYO2r67BVps= inducing growth of new vessels is known as angiogenesis. between clinical trials and real-world results is an unmet medical need Angiogenesis is a multistep, tightly regulated process that that supports the necessity of new treatment modalities for nAMD. Of is controlled by a dynamic balance of positive and negative fac- the various treatments being studied, anti-VEGFs of higher efficacy and tors.5 Factors that induce angiogenesis are VEGF, angiopoietins, longer durability are those more advanced in their development. Brolu- fibroblast growth factors, transforming growth factor-alpha and cizumab and abicipar pegol are 2 new anti-VEGF drugs that had positive -beta, hepatocyte growth factor, interleukin-8, and connective tis- results in phase 2 studies and are being tested in phase 3 trials at present. sue growth factor. Those that inhibit or modulate angiogenesis are Other promising therapies are antiangiopoietin 2 molecules, which are in vasostatin, angiostatin, endostatin, plasminogen kringle 5, throm- phase 2 development. At earlier stages of development but with promis- bospondin, and pigment epithelium derived factor.6,7 ing results are squalamine, anti–VEGF-C and -D, and gene therapy. The The large family of VEGF molecules includes VEGF-A, -B, future will give retina specialists a broad armamentarium with which pa- -C, -D, and -E and placental growth factor (PlGF). It is believed tients may achieve high visual gains for the long term with a low treat- the main type responsible for angiogenesis is VEGF-A, interact- ment burden. ing with VEGF receptor (VEGFR) 1 and 2. Other types of VEGF play different roles and do not directly stimulate angiogenesis or Key Words: neovascular, AMD, new, treatment, VEGF changes in permeability.8 Several agents manage at present to modulate angiogen- (Asia-Pac J Ophthalmol 2017;6:514–519) esis/permeability by blocking VEGF and preserving or improv- ing vision in most patients. The first drug to be approved that showed gains in vision of patients affected by neovascular AMD ge-related macular degeneration (AMD) is described as the was ranibizumab. The ANCHOR and MARINA trials were the Amost frequent cause of uncorrectable severe vision loss in pivotal studies that compared the use of ranibizumab versus pho- on people older than 55 years of age in the developed world. As todynamic therapy in classic membranes (ANCHOR) and versus 09/09/2020 many as 30% of adults 75 years of age or older develop signs placebo in occult membranes (MARINA), yielding vision gains of senile retinal degeneration, and the prevalence of AMD is in- for the ranibizumab groups and vision loss in the comparator creasing due to an aging population.1,2 groups.9,10 Another drug that showed efficacy initially when used systemically and then intravitreally was bevacizumab. Although never approved for this specific indication, the drug was used as From the *Organización Medica de Investigación, Buenos Aires, Argentina; 11,12 †Oftalmos Instituto Oftalmológico, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos an off-label treatment for neovascular AMD. Aires, Argentina; ‡Retina Section, Ophthalmology Department, Hospital de Later in 2012, aflibercept, a fusion protein, was approved Clinicas Jose de San Martin, School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina; §Fundacion Oftalmologica Nacional, Department for the treatment of neovascular AMD based on the results of of Ophthalmology, Universidad del Rosario School of Medicine, Bogota DC, the VIEW 1 and 2 trials.13 This drug showed a similar efficacy Colombia; ¶Centro Privado Romagosa-Fundacion VER, Cordoba, Argentina; and was noninferior to ranibizumab. Conbercept is another anti- and ∥Asociados de Macula Vítreo y Retina de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica. VEGF agent that has been successfully used to treat neovascular Received for publication June 30, 2017; accepted August 17, 2017. 14 P.G.S. is a consultant for Novartis, Allergan, and Roche and a member of the AMD, but it is only approved for use and available in China. speakers bureau for Novartis and Allergan. The oncology formulation of aflibercept, ziv-aflibercept, has also The authors have no other funding or conflicts of interest to declare. Reprints: Patricio G. Schlottmann, MD, Uruguay 725 PB, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, been used successfully to treat nAMD patients, although its use C1015ABO, Argentina. E-mail: [email protected]. is off-label, similar to bevacizumab but less widespread.15 All Copyright © 2017 by Asia Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology ISSN: 2162-0989 these agents have different costs and access levels depending DOI: 10.22608/APO.2017258 on whether they are licensed, but there is comparable efficacy 514 | www.apjo.org Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology • Volume 6, Number 6, November/December 2017 Copyright © 2017 Asia-Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology • Volume 6, Number 6, November/December 2017 New Treatment Modalities for nAMD among them.4,13 the use of vitamin and mineral supplementation for delaying pro- Despite having drugs that achieve positive results in clini- gression of AMD. This evidence has been largely drawn from a cal trials, with varying results according to the different treat- study with long follow-up in a well-nourished American popula- ment strategies, real-world results have been disappointing in tion, which may limit the generalizability of the results to other several reports, even from countries with good medical access.16 populations.23 Long-term follow-up of patients enrolled in clinical trials using There is a strong association between the risk of both geo- anti-VEGF for neovascular AMD also showed poor results af- graphic atrophy and CNV and pack years of cigarette smoking, ter 5 years of treatment.17 The main reason for low visual gains supporting a causal relation between smoking and AMD. Smok- is linked to reduced frequency of injections and increased time ing cessation may have a strong impact on AMD progression.24 between visits. These long-term clinical trial results tend to be It is not clear though, whether once a neovascular stage has been similar to real-world settings.18 It has been speculated that long- reached, quitting smoking has an impact on the number of injec- term results could have been better at a cost of heavy burdens to tions or visual gain. the health system and patients alike. At present neovascular AMD treatment has very positive re- sults in clinical trials and less successful results in real life. All NEW ANTI-VEGF MOLECULES treatments available today have the same or very similar mecha- Brolucizumab (RTH258, formerly ESBA1008, Alcon) is a nism of action, which is blockade of the VEGF molecule. humanized single-chain antibody fragment that inhibits all iso- forms of VEGF-A. It is the smallest of the anti-VEGF antibodies, with a molecular weight of 26 kDa, compared with 115 kDa for NEED FOR NEW TREATMENT MODALITIES aflibercept and 48 kDa for ranibizumab. By virtue of its design, Newer treatment strategies (Table 1) are needed to close the it is possible to concentrate brolucizumab up to 120 mg/mL, al- gap between clinical trial results and real-world settings. These lowing the administration of 6 mg in a single 50-mL intravitreal new treatment modalities should be able to have better efficacy, injection. On a molar basis, 6 mg of brolucizumab equals ap- longer duration of action, or simultaneous effects on angiogen- proximately 12 times the 2.0-mg dose of aflibercept and 22 times esis/permeability and the main physiopathologic cause for poor the 0.5-mg dose of ranibizumab. These attributes may confer po- long-term results: atrophy and scarring.19,20 tential advantages in the treatment of nAMD. A small molecular weight and high drug concentration gradient between the vitreous and retina may support drug distribution into the retina. Assuming EARLY DETECTION AND PREVENTION comparable half-life, higher molar doses of drug may be cleared Although there are currently no proven effective treatments more slowly from the eye, thus prolonging duration of action.
Recommended publications
  • Predictive QSAR Tools to Aid in Early Process Development of Monoclonal Antibodies
    Predictive QSAR tools to aid in early process development of monoclonal antibodies John Micael Andreas Karlberg Published work submitted to Newcastle University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Engineering November 2019 Abstract Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have become one of the fastest growing markets for diagnostic and therapeutic treatments over the last 30 years with a global sales revenue around $89 billion reported in 2017. A popular framework widely used in pharmaceutical industries for designing manufacturing processes for mAbs is Quality by Design (QbD) due to providing a structured and systematic approach in investigation and screening process parameters that might influence the product quality. However, due to the large number of product quality attributes (CQAs) and process parameters that exist in an mAb process platform, extensive investigation is needed to characterise their impact on the product quality which makes the process development costly and time consuming. There is thus an urgent need for methods and tools that can be used for early risk-based selection of critical product properties and process factors to reduce the number of potential factors that have to be investigated, thereby aiding in speeding up the process development and reduce costs. In this study, a framework for predictive model development based on Quantitative Structure- Activity Relationship (QSAR) modelling was developed to link structural features and properties of mAbs to Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography (HIC) retention times and expressed mAb yield from HEK cells. Model development was based on a structured approach for incremental model refinement and evaluation that aided in increasing model performance until becoming acceptable in accordance to the OECD guidelines for QSAR models.
    [Show full text]
  • DRUGS REQUIRING PRIOR AUTHORIZATION in the MEDICAL BENEFIT Page 1
    Effective Date: 08/01/2021 DRUGS REQUIRING PRIOR AUTHORIZATION IN THE MEDICAL BENEFIT Page 1 Therapeutic Category Drug Class Trade Name Generic Name HCPCS Procedure Code HCPCS Procedure Code Description Anti-infectives Antiretrovirals, HIV CABENUVA cabotegravir-rilpivirine C9077 Injection, cabotegravir and rilpivirine, 2mg/3mg Antithrombotic Agents von Willebrand Factor-Directed Antibody CABLIVI caplacizumab-yhdp C9047 Injection, caplacizumab-yhdp, 1 mg Cardiology Antilipemic EVKEEZA evinacumab-dgnb C9079 Injection, evinacumab-dgnb, 5 mg Cardiology Hemostatic Agent BERINERT c1 esterase J0597 Injection, C1 esterase inhibitor (human), Berinert, 10 units Cardiology Hemostatic Agent CINRYZE c1 esterase J0598 Injection, C1 esterase inhibitor (human), Cinryze, 10 units Cardiology Hemostatic Agent FIRAZYR icatibant J1744 Injection, icatibant, 1 mg Cardiology Hemostatic Agent HAEGARDA c1 esterase J0599 Injection, C1 esterase inhibitor (human), (Haegarda), 10 units Cardiology Hemostatic Agent ICATIBANT (generic) icatibant J1744 Injection, icatibant, 1 mg Cardiology Hemostatic Agent KALBITOR ecallantide J1290 Injection, ecallantide, 1 mg Cardiology Hemostatic Agent RUCONEST c1 esterase J0596 Injection, C1 esterase inhibitor (recombinant), Ruconest, 10 units Injection, lanadelumab-flyo, 1 mg (code may be used for Medicare when drug administered under Cardiology Hemostatic Agent TAKHZYRO lanadelumab-flyo J0593 direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self-administered) Cardiology Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension EPOPROSTENOL (generic)
    [Show full text]
  • BLA 761125 Page 7
    BLA 761125 Page 7 HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION -----------------------WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS----------------------­ These highlights do not include all the information needed to use BEOVU Endophthalmitis and retinal detachments may occur following intravitreal safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for BEOVU. injections. Patients should be instructed to report any symptoms suggestive of endophthalmitis or retinal detachment without delay (5.1). BEOVU® (brolucizumab-dbll) injection, for intravitreal injection Increases in intraocular pressure (IOP) have been seen within 30 minutes of Initial U.S. Approval: 2019 an intravitreal injection (5.2). ----------------------------INDICATIONS AND USAGE-------------------------­ There is a potential risk of arterial thromboembolic events (ATE) following BEOVU is a human vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor intravitreal use of VEGF inhibitors (5.3). indicated for the treatment of Neovascular (Wet) Age-Related Macular ------------------------------ADVERSE REACTIONS-----------------------------­ Degeneration (AMD) (1). The most common adverse reactions (≥ 5%) reported in patients receiving ----------------------DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION----------------------­ BEOVU are vision blurred (10%), cataract (7%), conjunctival hemorrhage BEOVU is administered by intravitreal injection. The recommended dose for (6%), eye pain (5%), and vitreous floaters (5%) (6.1). BEOVU is 6 mg (0.05 mL of 120 mg/mL solution) monthly (approximately To report SUSPECTED ADVERSE REACTIONS, contact Novartis every 25-31 days) for the first three doses, followed by one dose of 6 mg (0.05 Pharmaceuticals Corporation at 1-888-669-6682 or FDA at 1-800-FDA­ mL) every 8-12 weeks (2). 1088 or www.fda.gov/medwatch. ---------------------DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS--------------------­ See 17 for PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION. Injection: 6 mg/0.05 mL solution for intravitreal injection in a single-dose vial (3).
    [Show full text]
  • Classification Decisions Taken by the Harmonized System Committee from the 47Th to 60Th Sessions (2011
    CLASSIFICATION DECISIONS TAKEN BY THE HARMONIZED SYSTEM COMMITTEE FROM THE 47TH TO 60TH SESSIONS (2011 - 2018) WORLD CUSTOMS ORGANIZATION Rue du Marché 30 B-1210 Brussels Belgium November 2011 Copyright © 2011 World Customs Organization. All rights reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning translation, reproduction and adaptation rights should be addressed to [email protected]. D/2011/0448/25 The following list contains the classification decisions (other than those subject to a reservation) taken by the Harmonized System Committee ( 47th Session – March 2011) on specific products, together with their related Harmonized System code numbers and, in certain cases, the classification rationale. Advice Parties seeking to import or export merchandise covered by a decision are advised to verify the implementation of the decision by the importing or exporting country, as the case may be. HS codes Classification No Product description Classification considered rationale 1. Preparation, in the form of a powder, consisting of 92 % sugar, 6 % 2106.90 GRIs 1 and 6 black currant powder, anticaking agent, citric acid and black currant flavouring, put up for retail sale in 32-gram sachets, intended to be consumed as a beverage after mixing with hot water. 2. Vanutide cridificar (INN List 100). 3002.20 3. Certain INN products. Chapters 28, 29 (See “INN List 101” at the end of this publication.) and 30 4. Certain INN products. Chapters 13, 29 (See “INN List 102” at the end of this publication.) and 30 5. Certain INN products. Chapters 28, 29, (See “INN List 103” at the end of this publication.) 30, 35 and 39 6. Re-classification of INN products.
    [Show full text]
  • Regeneron Needs a New Plan B for Eylea
    November 27, 2017 Regeneron needs a new plan B for Eylea Madeleine Armstrong Regeneron’s efforts to extend the lifespan of its blockbuster Eylea franchise via combinations have fallen flat again, raising the question of whether it can find anything that can best Eylea alone. With competition on the horizon from Novartis’s rival wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) project, brolucizumab, Eylea sales are forecast to flatten after 2020 – something that Regeneron cannot now counter with combos (see table below). Regeneron’s stock was down 3% in premarket trading this morning, but the shares opened down just 1%. Investors might have been reassured by the fact that full data from the Hawk and Harrier studies of brolucizumab, released earlier this month, were not the smash hit that Novartis had hoped for. This could allow Eylea to keep its dominant position in the wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) market for some time to come. Top wet AMD drugs in 2022 Annual indication sales ($m) Product Company Status 2016 2018e 2020e 2022e Eylea Regeneron/Bayer/Santen Pharmaceutical Marketed 3,584 3,875 4,073 3,942 Lucentis Novartis/Roche Marketed 2,354 2,271 1,924 1,460 Brolucizumab Novartis Phase III - - 319 937 Source: EvaluatePharma. And if positive, the phase III Panorama study of Eylea monotherapy in diabetic retinopathy, due to report in the first half of next year, could open up another avenue for growth for the company’s most valuable product. But even the most optimistic Regeneron bulls will have to admit that Eylea’s sales are likely to be eroded by the market entry of brolucizumab, expected in 2019 or 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • The Two Tontti Tudiul Lui Hi Ha Unit
    THETWO TONTTI USTUDIUL 20170267753A1 LUI HI HA UNIT ( 19) United States (12 ) Patent Application Publication (10 ) Pub. No. : US 2017 /0267753 A1 Ehrenpreis (43 ) Pub . Date : Sep . 21 , 2017 ( 54 ) COMBINATION THERAPY FOR (52 ) U .S . CI. CO - ADMINISTRATION OF MONOCLONAL CPC .. .. CO7K 16 / 241 ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 39 / 3955 ANTIBODIES ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 31 /4706 ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 31 / 165 ( 2013 .01 ) ; CO7K 2317 /21 (2013 . 01 ) ; (71 ) Applicant: Eli D Ehrenpreis , Skokie , IL (US ) CO7K 2317/ 24 ( 2013. 01 ) ; A61K 2039/ 505 ( 2013 .01 ) (72 ) Inventor : Eli D Ehrenpreis, Skokie , IL (US ) (57 ) ABSTRACT Disclosed are methods for enhancing the efficacy of mono (21 ) Appl. No. : 15 /605 ,212 clonal antibody therapy , which entails co - administering a therapeutic monoclonal antibody , or a functional fragment (22 ) Filed : May 25 , 2017 thereof, and an effective amount of colchicine or hydroxy chloroquine , or a combination thereof, to a patient in need Related U . S . Application Data thereof . Also disclosed are methods of prolonging or increasing the time a monoclonal antibody remains in the (63 ) Continuation - in - part of application No . 14 / 947 , 193 , circulation of a patient, which entails co - administering a filed on Nov. 20 , 2015 . therapeutic monoclonal antibody , or a functional fragment ( 60 ) Provisional application No . 62/ 082, 682 , filed on Nov . of the monoclonal antibody , and an effective amount of 21 , 2014 . colchicine or hydroxychloroquine , or a combination thereof, to a patient in need thereof, wherein the time themonoclonal antibody remains in the circulation ( e . g . , blood serum ) of the Publication Classification patient is increased relative to the same regimen of admin (51 ) Int .
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2017/0172932 A1 Peyman (43) Pub
    US 20170172932A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2017/0172932 A1 Peyman (43) Pub. Date: Jun. 22, 2017 (54) EARLY CANCER DETECTION AND A 6LX 39/395 (2006.01) ENHANCED IMMUNOTHERAPY A61R 4I/00 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. (71) Applicant: Gholam A. Peyman, Sun City, AZ CPC .......... A61K 9/50 (2013.01); A61K 39/39558 (US) (2013.01); A61K 4I/0052 (2013.01); A61 K 48/00 (2013.01); A61K 35/17 (2013.01); A61 K (72) Inventor: sham A. Peyman, Sun City, AZ 35/15 (2013.01); A61K 2035/124 (2013.01) (21) Appl. No.: 15/143,981 (57) ABSTRACT (22) Filed: May 2, 2016 A method of therapy for a tumor or other pathology by administering a combination of thermotherapy and immu Related U.S. Application Data notherapy optionally combined with gene delivery. The combination therapy beneficially treats the tumor and pre (63) Continuation-in-part of application No. 14/976,321, vents tumor recurrence, either locally or at a different site, by filed on Dec. 21, 2015. boosting the patient’s immune response both at the time or original therapy and/or for later therapy. With respect to Publication Classification gene delivery, the inventive method may be used in cancer (51) Int. Cl. therapy, but is not limited to such use; it will be appreciated A 6LX 9/50 (2006.01) that the inventive method may be used for gene delivery in A6 IK 35/5 (2006.01) general. The controlled and precise application of thermal A6 IK 4.8/00 (2006.01) energy enhances gene transfer to any cell, whether the cell A 6LX 35/7 (2006.01) is a neoplastic cell, a pre-neoplastic cell, or a normal cell.
    [Show full text]
  • International Nonproprietary Names for Pharmaceutical Substances (INN)
    pre-publication copy Recommended INN: List 74 International Nonproprietary Names for Pharmaceutical Substances (INN) RECOMMENDED International Nonproprietary Names: List 74 Notice is hereby given that, in accordance with paragraph 7 of the Procedure for the Selection of Recommended International Nonproprietary Names for Pharmaceutical Substances [Off. Rec. Wld Health Org., 1955, 60, 3 (Resolution EB15.R7); 1969, 173, 10 (Resolution EB43.R9); Resolution EB115.R4 (EB115/2005/REC/1)], the following names are selected as Recommended International Nonproprietary Names. The inclusion of a name in the lists of Recommended International Nonproprietary Names does not imply any recommendation of the use of the substance in medicine or pharmacy. Lists of Proposed (1–109) and Recommended (1–70) International Nonproprietary Names can be found in Cumulative List No. 15, 2013 (available in CD-ROM only). Dénominations communes internationales des Substances pharmaceutiques (DCI) Dénominations communes internationales RECOMMANDÉES: Liste 74 Il est notifié que, conformément aux dispositions du paragraphe 7 de la Procédure à suivre en vue du choix de Dénominations communes internationales recommandées pour les Substances pharmaceutiques [Actes off. Org. mond. Santé, 1955, 60, 3 (résolution EB15.R7); 1969, 173, 10 (résolution EB43.R9); résolution EB115.R4 (EB115/2005/REC/1)] les dénominations ci-dessous sont choisies par l’Organisation mondiale de la Santé en tant que dénominations communes internationales recommandées. L’inclusion d’une dénomination dans les listes de DCI recommandées n’implique aucune recommandation en vue de l’utilisation de la substance correspondante en médecine ou en pharmacie. On trouvera d’autres listes de Dénominations communes internationales proposées (1–109) et recommandées (1–70) dans la Liste récapitulative No.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 FDA Biopharmaceutical Approvals: a Record Year for Follow-On Products, but Is Innovation Lagging? Bioplan Associates, Inc
    Confidential White Paper – Not for Distribution 2019 FDA Biopharmaceutical Approvals: A Record Year for Follow-on Products, But is Innovation Lagging? BioPlan Associates, Inc. January 2020 Introduction Although 2019 was overall a good year for biopharmaceutical product approvals, there was a lower percentage of approvals for fully new, innovative products compared with prior years. This may indicate problems with recent years’ pharmaceutical industry increased investment in biopharmaceutical vs. drug R&D, with a relative increase in resulting innovative product approvals not showing up yet. It may be too early to make conclusions regarding the extent of this pipeline trend, but the record portion of follow-on product approvals (63% of approvals) can be viewed as positive or negative for the industry. Biopharmaceuticals are here defined as prescription therapeutic products containing active agents manufactured using biotechnology methods, i.e., using living organisms (1). Figure 1 shows the numbers of recombinant and non-recombinant biopharmaceuticals approved by FDA since 1981, when the first recombinant protein received approval. Total biopharmaceutical approvals have increased over the years while remaining steady in the past few years. Figure 1: Numbers of Recombinant and Non-Recombinant Biopharmaceuticals Approved by FDA, 1981-2019 ©2020 BioPlan Associates, Inc, 2275 Research Blvd., Ste. 500, Rockville, MD 20850 (301) 921-5979 Page: 1 Confidential White Paper – Not for Distribution Approvals in 2019 In Table 1 we present approvals during 2019. Several oligonucleotide therapeutics, both antisense and RNAi, also received approval, but these are synthetically manufactured drugs and not considered biopharmaceuticals. Other products not included as biopharmaceuticals include medical devices, allergenic extract products, and diagnostics that receive biologics (BLA) approvals.
    [Show full text]
  • CHMP Agenda of the 19-22 April 2021 Meeting
    28 July 2021 EMA/CHMP/220334/2021 Corr.11 Human Medicines Division Committee for medicinal products for human use (CHMP) Agenda for the meeting on 19-22 April 2021 Chair: Harald Enzmann – Vice-Chair: Bruno Sepodes 19 April 2021, 09:00 – 19:30, virtual meeting/ room 1C 20 April 2021, 08:30 – 19:30, virtual meeting/ room 1C 21 April 2021, 08:30 – 19:30, virtual meeting/ room 1D 22 April 2021, 08:30 – 19:00, virtual meeting/ room 1C Disclaimers Some of the information contained in this agenda is considered commercially confidential or sensitive and therefore not disclosed. With regard to intended therapeutic indications or procedure scopes listed against products, it must be noted that these may not reflect the full wording proposed by applicants and may also vary during the course of the review. Additional details on some of these procedures will be published in the CHMP meeting highlights once the procedures are finalised and start of referrals will also be available. Of note, this agenda is a working document primarily designed for CHMP members and the work the Committee undertakes. Note on access to documents Some documents mentioned in the agenda cannot be released at present following a request for access to documents within the framework of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 as they are subject to on- going procedures for which a final decision has not yet been adopted. They will become public when adopted or considered public according to the principles stated in the Agency policy on access to documents (EMA/127362/2006). 1 Correction in section 8.1.1 Official address Domenico Scarlattilaan 6 ● 1083 HS Amsterdam ● The Netherlands Address for visits and deliveries Refer to www.ema.europa.eu/how-to-find-us Send us a question Go to www.ema.europa.eu/contact Telephone +31 (0)88 781 6000 An agency of the European Union © European Medicines Agency, 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Heparin-Binding VEGFR1 Variants As Long-Acting VEGF Inhibitors for Treatment of Intraocular Neovascular Disorders
    Heparin-binding VEGFR1 variants as long-acting VEGF inhibitors for treatment of intraocular neovascular disorders Hong Xina, Nilima Biswasa, Pin Lia, Cuiling Zhonga, Tamara C. Chanb, Eric Nudlemanb, and Napoleone Ferraraa,b,1 aDepartment of Pathology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093; and bDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 Contributed by Napoleone Ferrara, April 20, 2021 (sent for review December 4, 2019; reviewed by Jayakrishna Ambati and Lois E. H. Smith) Neovascularization is a key feature of ischemic retinal diseases and VEGF inhibitors have become a standard of therapy in mul- the wet form of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), all lead- tiple tumors and have transformed the treatment of intraocular ing causes of severe vision loss. Vascular endothelial growth factor neovascular disorders such as the neovascular form of age-related (VEGF) inhibitors have transformed the treatment of these disor- macular degeneration (AMD), proliferative diabetic retinopathy, ders. Millions of patients have been treated with these drugs and retinal vein occlusion, which are leading causes of severe vision worldwide. However, in real-life clinical settings, many patients loss and legal blindness (3, 5, 18). Currently, three anti-VEGF drugs do not experience the same degree of benefit observed in clinical are widely used in the United States for ophthalmological indica- trials, in part because they receive fewer anti-VEGF injections. tions: bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept (3). Bevacizumab Therefore, there is an urgent need to discover and identify novel is a full-length IgG antibody targeting VEGF (19). Even though long-acting VEGF inhibitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Brolucizumab for Wet Age- Related Macular Degeneration
    NEW PRODUCT ■ Brolucizumab for wet age- related macular degeneration STEVE CHAPLIN Brolucizumab (Beovu) KEY POINTS is a new monoclonal antibody fragment ■ Brolucizumab is a monoclonal antibody fragment targeting VEGF-A targeting VEGF-A for the ■ It is licensed for the treatment of neovascular (wet) age-related macular treatment of neovascular degeneration (AMD) (wet) age-related macular ■ The recommended dose is 6mg by intravitreal injection every four weeks for the first three doses, then every eight weeks if disease activity continues, or every 12 degeneration (AMD). weeks if AMD is stable This article outlines its ■ In two phase 3 trials, brolucizumab was non-inferior to aflibercept in improving mechanism of action, best-corrected visual acuity from a mean baseline of about 61 letters place in therapy, clinical ■ It showed superiority over aflibercept for certain secondary endpoints, eg efficacy and adverse reduction in central subfield thickness, retinal and subretinal fluid control effects. ■ Adverse events associated with brolucizumab were typical of anti-VEGF agents, and similar in frequency and severity to those associated with aflibercept ■ Broluzicumab costs £816 per dose he 2018 NICE guideline on the man- Tagement of age-related macular a legitimate off-label use2 and the Court degeneration (AMD) recommends treat- of Appeal has ruled that this use is law- ment with an intravitreal anti-vascular ful.3 A cost effectiveness analysis con- endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) cluded that the three anti-VEGF options agent (the monoclonal
    [Show full text]