DOCSLIB.ORG

I – Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
I – Introduction TABLE OF CONTENTS I – INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1 SECURITY COUNCIL .................................................................................. 1 GENERAL ASSEMBLY ............................................................................... 2 Voting Coincidence with the United States ............................................. 2 FORMAT AND METHODOLOGY .............................................................. 4 II – SECURITY COUNCIL ................................................................................. 5 COUNTRY AND REGIONAL RESOLUTIONS .......................................... 6 AFGHANISTAN ..................................................................................... 6 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA ............................................................ 10 BURUNDI ............................................................................................... 11 CHAD, CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC, AND REGION ................. 12 CÔTE D’IVOIRE .................................................................................... 13 CYPRUS .................................................................................................. 18 DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO ..................................... 20 EAST TIMOR (see TIMOR-LESTE) ETHIOPIA/ERITREA ............................................................................. 25 GEORGIA ............................................................................................... 27 GREAT LAKES REGION ...................................................................... 30 HAITI ...................................................................................................... 31 IRAN........................................................................................................ 32 IRAQ........................................................................................................ 35 LIBERIA .................................................................................................. 36 MIDDLE EAST ....................................................................................... 40 NEPAL .................................................................................................... 45 RWANDA ............................................................................................... 47 SIERRA LEONE ..................................................................................... 48 SOMALIA ............................................................................................... 50 SUDAN .................................................................................................... 64 TIMOR-LESTE ....................................................................................... 69 WESTERN SAHARA ............................................................................. 69 ZIMBABWE ............................................................................................ 71 THEMATIC RESOLUTIONS ....................................................................... 73 AFRICAN PEACE AND SECURITY .................................................... 73 INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR RWANDA ............ 74 INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA ..................................................................... 76 PROLIFERATION OF WMD ................................................................. 79 TERRORISM ........................................................................................... 81 WOMEN, PEACE & SECURITY ........................................................... 84 VOTING SUMMARIES ................................................................................ 86 III – GENERAL ASSEMBLY – OVERALL VOTES ......................................... 87 COMPARISON WITH U.S. VOTE ............................................................... 87 All Countries (Alphabetical) .................................................................... 89 All Countries (By Voting Coincidence Including Consensus) ................. 94 UN REGIONAL GROUPS ............................................................................ 99 African Group .......................................................................................... 99 Asian Group ............................................................................................. 100 i Voting Practices in the United Nations—2008 Latin American and Caribbean Group (LAC) .......................................... 102 Western European and Others Group (WEOG) ....................................... 103 Eastern European Group (EE) .................................................................. 103 OTHER GROUPINGS ................................................................................... 104 Arab Group .............................................................................................. 104 Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) .................................. 105 European Union (EU) .............................................................................. 105 Islamic Conference (OIC) ........................................................................ 106 Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) ............................................................. 108 Nordic Group .......................................................................................... 111 North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) ........................................... 111 HISTORICAL COMPARISON ..................................................................... 112 COUNTRIES RECEIVING U.S. ASSISTANCE (U.S. DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) AND ASSESSMENT RATES ........................................... 117 IV – GENERAL ASSEMBLY – IMPORTANT VOTES AND CONSENSUS ACTIONS ................................................................................... 123 IMPORTANT VOTES ................................................................................... 123 IMPORTANT CONSENSUS ACTIONS ...................................................... 134 COMPARISON WITH U.S. VOTES ............................................................. 144 All Countries (Alphabetical) .................................................................... 145 All Countries (Ranked by Identical Votes) .............................................. 150 UN REGIONAL GROUPS ............................................................................ 155 African Group .......................................................................................... 155 Asian Group ............................................................................................. 156 Latin American and Caribbean Group (LAC) .......................................... 158 Western European and Others Group (WEOG) ....................................... 159 Eastern European Group (EE) .................................................................. 159 OTHER GROUPINGS ................................................................................... 161 Arab Group .............................................................................................. 161 Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) .................................. 161 European Union (EU) .............................................................................. 162 Islamic Conference (OIC) ........................................................................ 163 Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) ............................................................. 164 Nordic Group .......................................................................................... 167 North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) ........................................... 167 COMPARISON OF IMPORTANT AND OVERALL VOTES ..................... 169 V – COUNTRY VOTING PRACTICES.............................................................. 175 AFGHANISTAN ........................................................................................... 176 ALBANIA ...................................................................................................... 176 ALGERIA ...................................................................................................... 177 ANDORRA .................................................................................................... 177 ANGOLA ....................................................................................................... 178 ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA ........................................................................ 178 ARGENTINA ................................................................................................ 179 ARMENIA ..................................................................................................... 179 AUSTRALIA ................................................................................................. 180 AUSTRIA ...................................................................................................... 180 AZERBAIJAN ............................................................................................... 181 BAHAMAS .................................................................................................... 181 BAHRAIN ..................................................................................................... 182 ii Table of Contents BANGLADESH ............................................................................................. 182 BARBADOS .................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • United Nations Mission in the Central African Republic and Chad (MINURCAT) / European Union Force (EUFOR)
    United Nations Mission in the Central African Republic and Chad (MINURCAT) / European Union Force (EUFOR) Short Mission Brief I. Activity Summary: MINURCAT and EUFOR Overview The United Nations Mission in the Central African Republic and Chad (MINURCAT), active from 2007 through 2010, was challenged from the start by the Chadian government’s minimal consent for a UN presence, which precluded the political processes essential to successful peacekeeping and eventually forced the abrupt closure of the mission. Though MINURCAT and the associated European Union Force Chad/CAR (EUFOR Chad/CAR) represent an interesting example of peacekeeping partnerships, their work was limited largely to protection of civilians and security sector training activities, without the ability to address underlying causes of conflict and instability. Regional dynamics and the Chadian government’s adept maneuvering hindered the intervention’s success in protecting vulnerable populations. Background Chad and its political fortunes have been deeply affected by regional actors since its days as a French colony. Since Chad’s independence in 1960, France, Sudan, and Libya have provided patronage, arms, support to rebel groups, and peacekeepers. Chad has hosted around 1,000 French troops in N’Djamena since the end of the colonial regime, maintaining one of three permanent French African military bases in Chad’s capital city. French and Chadian leaders place a premium on their personal relationships with one another to this day. Chad was the first country to host a peacekeeping operation from the African Union’s precursor, the Organization of African Unity, in response to a civil war between the government of President Goukouni Oueddei and the Northern Armed Forces of former Vice President Hissène Habré.
    [Show full text]
  • African Dialects
    African Dialects • Adangme (Ghana ) • Afrikaans (Southern Africa ) • Akan: Asante (Ashanti) dialect (Ghana ) • Akan: Fante dialect (Ghana ) • Akan: Twi (Akwapem) dialect (Ghana ) • Amharic (Amarigna; Amarinya) (Ethiopia ) • Awing (Cameroon ) • Bakuba (Busoong, Kuba, Bushong) (Congo ) • Bambara (Mali; Senegal; Burkina ) • Bamoun (Cameroons ) • Bargu (Bariba) (Benin; Nigeria; Togo ) • Bassa (Gbasa) (Liberia ) • ici-Bemba (Wemba) (Congo; Zambia ) • Berba (Benin ) • Bihari: Mauritian Bhojpuri dialect - Latin Script (Mauritius ) • Bobo (Bwamou) (Burkina ) • Bulu (Boulou) (Cameroons ) • Chirpon-Lete-Anum (Cherepong; Guan) (Ghana ) • Ciokwe (Chokwe) (Angola; Congo ) • Creole, Indian Ocean: Mauritian dialect (Mauritius ) • Creole, Indian Ocean: Seychelles dialect (Kreol) (Seychelles ) • Dagbani (Dagbane; Dagomba) (Ghana; Togo ) • Diola (Jola) (Upper West Africa ) • Diola (Jola): Fogny (Jóola Fóoñi) dialect (The Gambia; Guinea; Senegal ) • Duala (Douala) (Cameroons ) • Dyula (Jula) (Burkina ) • Efik (Nigeria ) • Ekoi: Ejagham dialect (Cameroons; Nigeria ) • Ewe (Benin; Ghana; Togo ) • Ewe: Ge (Mina) dialect (Benin; Togo ) • Ewe: Watyi (Ouatchi, Waci) dialect (Benin; Togo ) • Ewondo (Cameroons ) • Fang (Equitorial Guinea ) • Fõ (Fon; Dahoméen) (Benin ) • Frafra (Ghana ) • Ful (Fula; Fulani; Fulfulde; Peul; Toucouleur) (West Africa ) • Ful: Torado dialect (Senegal ) • Gã: Accra dialect (Ghana; Togo ) • Gambai (Ngambai; Ngambaye) (Chad ) • olu-Ganda (Luganda) (Uganda ) • Gbaya (Baya) (Central African Republic; Cameroons; Congo ) • Gben (Ben) (Togo
    [Show full text]
  • Central African Republic (C.A.R.) Appears to Have Been Settled Territory of Chad
    Grids & Datums CENTRAL AFRI C AN REPUBLI C by Clifford J. Mugnier, C.P., C.M.S. “The Central African Republic (C.A.R.) appears to have been settled territory of Chad. Two years later the territory of Ubangi-Shari and from at least the 7th century on by overlapping empires, including the the military territory of Chad were merged into a single territory. The Kanem-Bornou, Ouaddai, Baguirmi, and Dafour groups based in Lake colony of Ubangi-Shari - Chad was formed in 1906 with Chad under Chad and the Upper Nile. Later, various sultanates claimed present- a regional commander at Fort-Lamy subordinate to Ubangi-Shari. The day C.A.R., using the entire Oubangui region as a slave reservoir, from commissioner general of French Congo was raised to the status of a which slaves were traded north across the Sahara and to West Africa governor generalship in 1908; and by a decree of January 15, 1910, for export by European traders. Population migration in the 18th and the name of French Equatorial Africa was given to a federation of the 19th centuries brought new migrants into the area, including the Zande, three colonies (Gabon, Middle Congo, and Ubangi-Shari - Chad), each Banda, and M’Baka-Mandjia. In 1875 the Egyptian sultan Rabah of which had its own lieutenant governor. In 1914 Chad was detached governed Upper-Oubangui, which included present-day C.A.R.” (U.S. from the colony of Ubangi-Shari and made a separate territory; full Department of State Background Notes, 2012). colonial status was conferred on Chad in 1920.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward Resolving Chad's Interlocking Conflicts
    Toward Resolving Chad’s Interlocking Conflicts AUTHORS Sarah Bessell, Kelly Campbell December 2008 UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE 1200 17th Street NW, Suite 200 Washington, DC 20036-3011 www.usip.org SYNOPSIS This USIPeace Briefing, based on a recent event, explores the internal, regional, and international components of the crisis in Chad. OVERVIEW The fragility of the Chadian government, as well as the fragmentation among Chadian civil society, political parties, and rebel movements, poses significant challenges that Chadian civil society, regional governments, African institutions and the international community must address with a coordinated strategy. Although the situation in the country is often examined through the lens of the Darfur crisis, several internal factors drive the instability in Chad and its regional actions. Thus far, efforts to address the political, security and humanitarian problems in Chad have seemed piecemeal and uncoordinated. A consensus is building that a comprehensive strategy encompassing the national, regional and international dimensions of the crisis is needed to move toward peace and stability both within Chad and between Chad and its neighbors. In October 2008, USIP and the International Peace Institute, in collaboration with Caring for Kaela, sponsored a multi-stakeholder consultation to address the political instability in Chad and its regional implications. The attendees included representatives from the Chadian diaspora, ambassadors from countries in the region, U.N. and EU representatives and experts from the non-governmental community and academia. This report summarizes the consultation’s main themes and recommendations. The first section addresses the security, political and humanitarian situation in Chad; examines the August 13 Political Agreement between the Chadian government and opposition parties and suggests ideas for the way forward.
    [Show full text]
  • History, External Influence and Political Volatility in the Central African Republic (CAR)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Journal for the Advancement of Developing Economies Economics Department 2014 History, External Influence and oliticalP Volatility in the Central African Republic (CAR) Henry Kam Kah University of Buea, Cameroon Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/jade Part of the Econometrics Commons, Growth and Development Commons, International Economics Commons, Political Economy Commons, Public Economics Commons, and the Regional Economics Commons Kam Kah, Henry, "History, External Influence and oliticalP Volatility in the Central African Republic (CAR)" (2014). Journal for the Advancement of Developing Economies. 5. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/jade/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Economics Department at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal for the Advancement of Developing Economies by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Journal for the Advancement of Developing Economies 2014 Volume 3 Issue 1 ISSN:2161-8216 History, External Influence and Political Volatility in the Central African Republic (CAR) Henry Kam Kah University of Buea, Cameroon ABSTRACT This paper examines the complex involvement of neighbors and other states in the leadership or political crisis in the CAR through a content analysis. It further discusses the repercussions of this on the unity and leadership of the country. The CAR has, for a long time, been embroiled in a crisis that has impeded the unity of the country. It is a failed state in Africa to say the least, and the involvement of neighboring and other states in the crisis in one way or the other has compounded the multifarious problems of this country.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Africa Regional Representation
    Central Africa Regional Representation Executive summary Based in Yaoundé, Cameroon, the Federation’s Central Africa Regional Representation (CARREP) covers the following eight countries: Cameroon, Central African Republic (CAR), Chad, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), the Republic of Congo (RoC), Equatorial Guinea, Gabon and Sao Tome and Principe. However, the DRC and Chad have country representations and thus separate plans. A joint plan has been prepared for Cameroon, CAR, RoC, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon and Sao Tome and Principe. Acting from its headquarters in Yaoundé, Cameroon, CARREP provides the financial and technical support required to enable the six national societies covered by this plan to improve the quality and efficiency of their humanitarian, social and community-based services in favour of vulnerable people and other people exposed to all sorts of hazards. The Central African region has been afflicted for many years by epidemics, endemic diseases, natural and man-made disasters, and conflicts that often led to significant population displacements or created situations of vulnerability which affected underprivileged communities incapable of self-sustenance (women, children, old persons and rural communities in general). Recently, the increasingly high cost of living has added a further burden to Central African populations. In addition, the illegal immigration phenomenon has intensified in Central Africa over the past years due to the rapid deterioration of living conditions. In fact, people chased away by conflicts and disasters, especially from the Central African Republic, the DRC and Chad, are forced to displace themselves, and this has intensified population movements within the region, the main destinations being Cameroon, Gabon, and in some cases Equatorial Guinea.
    [Show full text]
  • Dengue Fever in Senegal 6 - 7 Ongoing Events Ebola Virus Disease in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Humanitarian Crisis in Cameroon
    Overview Contents This Weekly Bulletin focuses on selected acute public health emergencies occurring in the WHO African Region. The WHO Health Emergencies Programme is currently monitoring 58 events in the region. This week’s edition covers key new and ongoing events, including: 2 Overview Hepatitis E in Central African Republic 3 - 5 New events Monkeypox in Central African Republic Dengue fever in Senegal 6 - 7 Ongoing events Ebola virus disease in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Humanitarian crisis in Cameroon. 8 Summary of major issues challenges and For each of these events, a brief description, followed by public health proposed actions measures implemented and an interpretation of the situation is provided. 9 All events currently A table is provided at the end of the bulletin with information on all new and being monitored ongoing public health events currently being monitored in the region, as well as events that have recently been closed. Major issues and challenges include: The Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo has reached a critical juncture, marked by a precarious security situation, persistence of pockets of community resistance/ mistrust and expanding geographical spread of the disease. During the reporting week, there was an incident involving a response team performing burial activity in Butembo. This came barely days following a widespread community strike (“ville morte”) in Beni and several towns, and an earlier armed attack in Beni. These incidents severely disrupted most outbreak control interventions. Meanwhile, EVD cases have been confirmed in new areas with worse insecurity and in close proximity to the border with Uganda.
    [Show full text]
  • Project to Interconnect the Power Grids of the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of Congo from the Boali Hydro-Power System –Phase 1
    Language: ENGLISH Original: French AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FUND PROJECT : PROJECT TO INTERCONNECT THE POWER GRIDS OF THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC AND THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO FROM THE BOALI HYDRO-POWER SYSTEM –PHASE 1 MULTINATIONAL: CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC AND DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO PROJECT APPRAISAL REPORT Date : August 2012 Team Leader J. B. NGUEMA-OLLO ONEC.1 3072 I. KONATE ONEC.1 3418 S. ASSYONGAR-MASRA ONEC.1 3541 D. IBRAHIME ONEC.1 2549 ONEC.3 M.A. BEZZAOUIA 3854 Team Members Cons. R. KITANDALA CDFO 6338 Appraisal Team C. DJEUFO CMFO 6809 J. BISSAKONOU CMFO 6807 M. YARO ORPF. 2 2790 Sector Division Manager A. ZAKOU ONEC. 1 2211 CFFO Resident Representative M. SANGARE CFFO 7160 CDFO Resident Representative V. ZONGO CDFO 6333 Sector Director H. CHEIKHROUHOU ONEC 2034 Regional Director M. KANGA ORCE 2060 A.MOUSSA ONEC. 1 2897 P. DJAIGBE ONEC. 1 3961 N. NDOUNDO ONEC. 1 2725 I TOURINO SOTO ONEC. 3 2533 R. ARON ONEC. 3 2792 A. FOURATI ONEC. 3 3854 ONEC. 1 3854 Peer Reviewers O.T. DIALLO Cons. K.DIALLO ORCE 2578 O. FALL OPSM 3820 S. WAKANA CDFO 6350 S. B. TOUNKARA CMFO 6822 C. AHOSSI CMFO 6811 C. BOLLO TEMA CMFO 6813 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 STRATEGIC THRUST AND RATIONALE ................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Linkages with the Two Countries’ Strategies and Objectives ....................... 1 1.2 Rationale for Bank’s Involvement ............................................................................. 1 1.3 Aid Coordination ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Central African Republic
    BTI 2020 Country Report Central African Republic This report is part of the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) 2020. It covers the period from February 1, 2017 to January 31, 2019. The BTI assesses the transformation toward democracy and a market economy as well as the quality of governance in 137 countries. More on the BTI at https://www.bti-project.org. Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2020 Country Report — Central African Republic. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2020. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Contact Bertelsmann Stiftung Carl-Bertelsmann-Strasse 256 33111 Gütersloh Germany Sabine Donner Phone +49 5241 81 81501 [email protected] Hauke Hartmann Phone +49 5241 81 81389 [email protected] Robert Schwarz Phone +49 5241 81 81402 [email protected] Sabine Steinkamp Phone +49 5241 81 81507 [email protected] BTI 2020 | Central African Republic 3 Key Indicators Population M 4.7 HDI 0.381 GDP p.c., PPP $ 872 Pop. growth1 % p.a. 1.5 HDI rank of 189 188 Gini Index 56.2 Life expectancy years 52.2 UN Education Index 0.353 Poverty3 % 83.1 Urban population % 41.4 Gender inequality2 0.682 Aid per capita $ 110.5 Sources (as of December 2019): The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2019 | UNDP, Human Development Report 2019. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate. (2) Gender Inequality Index (GII). (3) Percentage of population living on less than $3.20 a day at 2011 international prices. Executive Summary During the period under review, ending in January 2019, the Central African Republic was governed by a president elected by fair and transparent elections held in March 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Statement on Behalf of A3 (Niger, South Africa and Tunisia) and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
    Joint Statement on Behalf of A3 (Niger, South Africa and Tunisia) and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Delivered by H.E. Mr. Tarek Ladeb Permanent Representative of the Permanent Mission of Tunisia to the United Nations Open VTC on the Situation in the Central African Republic United Nations Security Council January 21st, 2021 New York Check Against Delivery Mr. President, I have the honor to deliver this statement on behalf of the A3+1 members of the Council, namely Kenya, Niger, Tunisia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. At the outset, let me thank the Special Representative of the Secretary-General, Mr. Mankeur Ndiaye, for his comprehensive briefing and reiterate our strong support for his efforts and for MINUSCA’s fundamental role in assisting the Central African Republic authorities and people in their quest to achieve lasting peace and stability. We reiterate our strongest condemnation of the attacks perpetrated by the CPC armed elements since the beginning of its offensive last December 2020 during which several MINUSCA peacekeepers were killed and several others were injured. We renew our deepest condolences and sympathy to the families of the deceased peacekeepers as well as to Bangladesh, Burundi, Cameroon, Gabon, Morocco, Rwanda, and MINUSCA. We call on national authorities of the CAR to swiftly investigate and bring to justice the perpetrators of these heinous acts. Such attacks against peacekeepers may constitute war crimes and should not go unpunished. We are deeply perturbed by the volatile security situation in the CAR and the continued destabilization efforts by these armed groups and spoilers throughout the country.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 7075 CHAD, DAHOMEY, GHANA, IVORY COAST, MALI, Etc
    No. 7075 CHAD, DAHOMEY, GHANA, IVORY COAST, MALI, etc. Convention (with annex) on the African Migratory Locust. Signed at Kano, on 25 May 1962 Official texts: French and English. Registered by Mali on 22 January 1964. TCHAD, DAHOMEY, GHANA, COTE-DTVOIRE, MALI, etc. Convention sur le criquet migrateur africain (avec annexe). Sign e Kano, le 25 mai 1962 Textes officiels français et anglais. Enregistrée par le Mali le 22 janvier 1964. 1964 Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités 105 No. 7075. CONVENTION1 ON THE AFRICAN MIGRATORY LOCUST. SIGNED AT KANO, ON 25 MAY 1962 The Governments of Cameroons Mauritania Central African Republic Niger Congo (Brazzaville) Nigeria Congo (L opoldville) Uganda Ivory Coast Rhodesia-Nyasaland Dahomey Senegal Gambia Sierra Leone Ghana Sudan Guinea Tanganyika Upper Volta Chad Kenya Togo Mali Desiring to continue on as wide an international basis as possible the preventive control of the African Migratory Locust undertaken in Africa in accordance with the Convention of May 15th 1952; Desiring to extend this preventive control to any species of migratory acrididae other than the African Migratory Locust, likely to appear in the out break area on the Niger; Taking note that, in order to facilitate the necessary reorganisation, the Governments party to the Convention of May 15th 1952 have declared themselves ready to terminate it on the date of entry into force of this Convention ; Have agreed as follows : Article 1 By this Convention there is established an Organisation called " The International African Locust Organisation " or in French " L©Organisation Internationale contre le Criquet Migrateur Africain ". 1 In accordance with article 9 (1), the Convention came into force on 13 April 1963, date of deposit of the sixth instrument of ratification or approval (a).
    [Show full text]
  • On the State of Peace and Security in Africa
    On the State of Peace and Security in Africa BY OLUSEGUN OBASANJO ecent developments and security threats in Mali, Central African Republic and Nigeria are alarming. And we cannot forget South Sudan and the endless conflicts in Somalia R and the Great Lakes. The African Union (AU), at its 50th Anniversary Solemn Declaration, pledged not to bequeath to future generations of Africans a legacy of wars and conflicts, by silenc- ing the guns by 2020. But 2020 is around the corner. What is the way out of this situation? Background to Today’s Security Concerns The African continent has no doubt witnessed many transformations in the last several decades, ranging from advances in the use of communication technology, to rapid economic growth trig- gered by an expanding market for Africa’s commodities, and a burgeoning youth population able to innovate in this environment. At the same time, our potential to translate these transformations into stable peace and development for African people is hampered by the continuing threat of armed conflict, along with its transmutations. Armed conflicts have become a recurrent reality in Africa since independence. From 1960 until the present day, fifty percent of Africa’s states have been ravaged by one form of conflict or another. The post-Cold War conflict resurgence is particularly disturbing. Peace and security scholars have attempted to classify armed conflicts on the continent into various catego- ries – some of which understandably only feature in our discourses in a historical sense. Categorization at this point is necessary, if only as an indication of how far we have come as a continent.
    [Show full text]