DOCSLIB.ORG

The Origins of Korean Chaebols and Their Roots in the Korean War

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Origins of Korean Chaebols and Their Roots in the Korean War The Origins of Korean Chaebols and their Roots in the Korean War Rhyu, Sang-young (Yonsei University) ddddddddecddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddc ddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddc ddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddc ddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddcedddddddd ddddddddecddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddc ddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddc ddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddc ddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddceddddddddecddddddddcedddddddd ddhc dd ddhc dd ddhc dd ddhc dd ddhc dd ddhc dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd �CONTENTS� dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd Ⅰ. Introduction: The Origins of Korean 1. Import Substitution Policy and dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd Chaebols from a Historical Perspective Consumer Products Light Industry dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd Ⅱ. New Demand and Business Practice 2. Liberal Party’s Dominance and dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd during the Korean War Predatory Rent Seeking dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd Ⅲ. Economic Events and the Formation Ⅴ. Rise and Fall of Korean Chaebols dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd of Chaebols after the Korean War in the 1950s: Factors and Patterns dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd 1. Disposal of ex-Japanese enterprises 1. Kyungbang Ltd. dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd dd
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chamber of Commerce International Comparisons �
    NO STONE UNTURNED � Chamber of Commerce International Comparisons � The Rt Hon the Lord Heseltine of Thenford CH Contents Foreword 2 Introduction 3 Section One – Background 4 Origin of chambers 4 Public and private law chamber models 6 • Public law models 7 • Private law models 9 Comparison of public and private law models 11 Section Two – Country comparisons 14 1. United Kingdom 14 2. United States of America 25 3. Japan 29 4. France 32 5. Germany 36 Annex A. Business West 40 B. Glossary 42 [1] Chambers of Commerce – International Comparisons Foreword In order to compare the support systems available to the private sector in competing economies I asked officials, supporting my review, to survey practice overseas. My enquiries coincided with similar work by the Minister of State for Trade and Investment, Lord Green. The findings from UK Trade and Investment are too detailed to include in my report1 but I believe the evidence from our research should be available. One observation. It is interesting how little awareness exists in this country of just what our companies are up against. One caveat. In the time and with the resource available to me I do not claim – and nor would officials – that this is a comprehensive or detailed survey of the full picture. It is an interesting and revealing snapshot. I hope this paper helps stimulate an informed debate about how best to use chambers of commerce to create a strong and sustainable business support environment, drawing on international best practice. Finally, I would like to take this opportunity to show my personal gratitude to all those who have contributed to this piece of work.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Direct Investment and Keiretsu: Rethinking U.S. and Japanese Policy
    This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: The Effects of U.S. Trade Protection and Promotion Policies Volume Author/Editor: Robert C. Feenstra, editor Volume Publisher: University of Chicago Press Volume ISBN: 0-226-23951-9 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/feen97-1 Conference Date: October 6-7, 1995 Publication Date: January 1997 Chapter Title: Foreign Direct Investment and Keiretsu: Rethinking U.S. and Japanese Policy Chapter Author: David E. Weinstein Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c0310 Chapter pages in book: (p. 81 - 116) 4 Foreign Direct Investment and Keiretsu: Rethinking U.S. and Japanese Policy David E. Weinstein For twenty-five years, the U.S. and Japanese governments have seen the rise of corporate groups in Japan, keiretsu, as due in part to foreign pressure to liberal- ize the Japanese market. In fact, virtually all works that discuss barriers in a historical context argue that Japanese corporations acted to insulate themselves from foreign takeovers by privately placing shares with each other (See, e.g., Encarnation 1992,76; Mason 1992; and Lawrence 1993). The story has proved to be a major boon for the opponents of a neoclassical approach to trade and investment policy. Proponents of the notion of “Japanese-style capitalism” in the Japanese government can argue that they did their part for liberalization and cannot be held responsible for private-sector outcomes. Meanwhile, pro- ponents of results-oriented policies (ROPs) can point to yet another example of how the removal of one barrier led to the formation of a second barrier.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chamber of Secrets an Investigation Into Who Funds the Notoriously Opaque U.S
    September 13, 2017 www.citizen.org The Chamber of Secrets An Investigation into Who Funds the Notoriously Opaque U.S. Chamber of Commerce Acknowledgments This report was written by Dan Dudis, Director of Public Citizen’s Chamber Watch project and overseen by Lisa Gilbert, Public Citizen’s Vice President of Legislative Affairs. Grace Aylmer, Chamber Watch Campaign Coordinator, and Nisma Gabobe, David King, and Alex Walker assisted with research. About Public Citizen Public Citizen is a national non-profit organization with more than 400,000 members and supporters. We represent consumer interests through lobbying, litigation, administrative advocacy, research, and public education on a broad range of issues including consumer rights in the marketplace, product safety, financial regulation, worker safety, safe and affordable health care, campaign finance reform and government ethics, fair trade, climate change, and corporate and government accountability. About Chamber Watch Chamber Watch is a project of Public Citizen. Its mission is raise awareness about the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, its reactionary, anti-worker, anti-consumer, anti-environmental agenda, and the central role it plays in the corporate capture of our democracy via its position as a leading lobbyist, dark money elections spender, and litigator. Public Citizen’s Congress Watch 215 Pennsylvania Ave. S.E Washington, D.C. 20003 P: 202-546-4996 F: 202-547-7392 http://www.citizen.org © 2017 Public Citizen Public Citizen The Chamber of Litigation I. Introduction The U.S. Chamber
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Governance of Company Groups: International and Latin American Experience
    Corporate Governance of Company Groups: International and Latin American Experience Preliminary version for comment. Hosted by : Please send written comments to [email protected] by 5 December, 2014 Latin American Roundtable Task Force on Corporate Governance of Company Groups 17 November, 2014 Hotel Hilton Bogotá, CARRERA 7 NO. 72-41, BOGOTA, 00000, COLOMBIA http://www.oecd.org/daf/ca/latinamericanroundtableoncorporategovernance.htm With funding support of: TABLE OF CONTENTS International and Latin American Overview ............................................................................. 3 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................ 3 2. Economic Rationale for Corporate Groups and the Role of Corporate Governance ............. 4 3. International Work on Corporate Governance of Groups ...................................................... 8 4. Economic Relevance of Company Groups in LatAm .......................................................... 12 5. What is an Economic Group in LatAm? .............................................................................. 12 6. Structure of the Regulatory and Supervisory Framework ................................................... 13 7. Protection of Minority Shareholder Rights .......................................................................... 14 8. Economic Groups and Conflicts of Interest ......................................................................... 15 9. Multinational
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Government-Sponsored R&D Consortia in Japan
    Chapter 12 EVALUATION OF GOVERNMENT-SPONSORED R&D CONSORTIA IN JAPAN by Mariko Sakakibara 1 Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles Introduction Co-operative R&D has been widely celebrated as a means of promoting private R&D, and some see it as a major tool for enhancing industry competitiveness. Co-operative R&D is defined as an agreement among a group of firms to share the costs and results of an R&D project prior to the execution of that project. Co-operative R&D can be executed in many forms, including R&D contracts, R&D consortia and research joint ventures.2 In this analysis, these forms are collectively referred to as R&D consortia or co-operative R&D projects, interchangeably. Japan is regarded as a forerunner in the practice of co-operative R&D. The most celebrated example is the VLSI (Very Large Scale Integrated circuit) project, designed to help Japan catch up in semiconductor technology. The project, conducted between 1975 to 1985 with a budget of 130 billion yen (US$591 million) of which 22 per cent was financed by the government, developed state-of-the-art semiconductor manufacturing technology. All of the major Japanese semiconductor producers participated in this project, and Japanese semiconductor companies gained world leadership after the project. It is widely believed that this success story is only one of many. The perceived success of the VLSI project has motivated other countries to emulate “Japanese- style” collaboration. The 1984 US National Co-operative Research Act was enacted to relax antitrust regulations in order to allow the formation of research joint ventures.
    [Show full text]
  • Wcf Ccc Ccreq
    ICC World Chambers Federation A specialized division of the International Chamber of Commerce WCF The world business organization ICC World Chambers Federation ICC World Chambers Federation The World Chambers Federation is ICC’s specialized division for its ICC, the world business organization chamber of commerce members worldwide. WCF was previously known as 38 Cours Albert 1er IBCC. WCF not only helps individual chambers to become more productive, 75008 Paris, France but also strengthens the links between them, in order to exchange Tel +33 1 49 53 29 44 experiences and improve their chamber’s performance in areas such as Fax +33 1 49 53 30 79 finance, management and the development and promotion of services. Email [email protected] ICC is the world business organization. Business everywhere benefits from www.worldchambersfederation.com ICC’s rules and policies for the conduct of trade. The 3rd CCC World Chambers Congress Canadian Chamber of Commerce The Canadian Chamber The Canadian Chamber is the only national organization that speaks for of Commerce Congress Report more than 170 000 businesses from every Canadian region. The strength of #501-350 Sparks Street its broad-based membership ensures that it is an articulate and persuasive Ottawa, Ontario K1R 7S8 Canada advocate for Canadian businesses of all sizes and from all sectors of the Tel +1 613 238 4000 economy on domestic, regional and international issues. Quebec City, 15 to 17 September 2003 Fax +1 613 238 7643 The goal of the Canadian Chamber's activities is to foster a strong, Email [email protected] competitive economic environment that benefits Canada and all Canadians, www.chamber.ca and enables Canadian business to maximize global opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Information Through Spain's Chambers Of
    Business Information Review http://bir.sagepub.com/ Business information through Spain's Chambers of Commerce : Meeting business needs Antonio Muñoz Cañavate and Pedro Hípola Business Information Review 2008 25: 224 DOI: 10.1177/0266382108098866 The online version of this article can be found at: http://bir.sagepub.com/content/25/4/224 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for Business Information Review can be found at: Email Alerts: http://bir.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://bir.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Downloaded from bir.sagepub.com at Universidad de Sevilla. Biblioteca on December 19, 2010 Business Information Review Copyright © 2008 SAGE Publications Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore and Washington DC, Vol 25(4): 224–229 [DOI: 10.1177/0266382108098866] Business information through Spain’s Chambers of Commerce Meeting business needs Antonio Muñoz Cañavate Antonio Muñoz Cañavate is a full professor at the Universidad de Facultad de Biblioteconomía y Documentación, Extremadura, Spain, and belongs to its Universidad de Extremadura, Spain Department of Information and Communication. He was previously a fellow at the Department of Computer Pedro Hípola Science of the University of Granada, where he began his studies of the infor- Departamento de Biblioteconomía y Documentación, mative value of the Internet. Having Facultad de Comunicación y Documentación, embarked on dual lines of research, both within the area of information Universidad de Granada, Spain management, one of his main interests is in the processes of corporative information management in Spain’s administrative realms, in the context ‘These services, which may be free or fee-based, depending on the of Electronic Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Fairfax County Business Resources Grid and Chambers of Commerce
    This grid offers information about other free and low-cost services available to entrepreneurs. All efforts have been made to confirm accuracy, but please proceed at your own risk. at own your proceed but please to accuracy, confirm made been All have efforts to entrepreneurs. available services This grid low-cost and free other information about offers Southeast Fairfax Development Corporation Fairfax Development Southeast SCORE RangeMe Council VirginiaNorthern Technology MyMoney.gov ("MIX") Exchange Innovation Mason SBDC Enterprise Center/Mason Mason Made in Fairfax 37 Mach Center Development Economic Latino Partners Program Business Green and Training Center Grants Research Grants.gov Go Virginia Program Defense Global Agriculture for Alliance Sustainable Future Harvest - Chesapeake Center Empowerment Financial Fairfax Council Food FairfaxLibrary Public County Coordinator for NonProfits Services' Development FairfaxLand County Authority (FCEDA) Development FairfaxEconomic County Material and of Fairfax Procurement Department Mangement County FairfaxDemographics County FairfaxCurrent County Solicitations Partner Startingand Experience a Business FairfaxBusiness County Education Business Entrepreneurship/Small Fairfax(ACE)Adult County Community Education & Export Virginia portal procurement of Virginia's e-VAelectronic - Commonwealth the Partnership Community Business ChambersofCommerce Capital Breakout Academy Amazon Small Business 1Million Cups Business Resource Grid Resource Business ● ● 3D Printing ● ● ● Accelerator ● ● ● ● ● Access
    [Show full text]
  • The Father of Japanese Capitalism: Shibusawa Eiichi's Vision of The
    Case Study #11 April 2019 The Father of Japanese Capitalism: Shibusawa Eiichi’s Vision of the Ethical Corporation Introduction When Europeans began trading with Japan in the 16th century, they were amazed by Japanese craftsmanship, the country’s sophistication, and its extraordinary wealth but the Japanese elite were not equally convinced by the benefits of European trade. Wary of foreign influence, particularly the attempts by Christian missionaries to convert the Japanese, the Tokugawa Shogunate enforced a policy of strict isolation in Japan. Tokugawa Iemitsu, the shogun of Japan from 1623 to 1651, issued a series of edicts placing severe restrictions on trade and the movement of people and goods after 1638. These prohibitions remained in place for more than two hundred years until 8 July 1853 when, under the command of Commodore Matthew Perry, four United States Naval Ships sailed into Tokyo Bay. In the decades leading up to this confrontation, the presence of foreign ships in Japanese waters had become an increasingly common sight as western powers competed ever more fiercely to establish trade relations in the region. The arrival of Perry’s “black ships”, however, marked a stark shift in Japan’s foreign relations. American President Millard Fillmore had tasked Perry with forcing open Japanese ports to US vessels and, unlike in previous naval expeditions, granted him full and discretionary powers to achieve this end. On arriving into Tokyo Bay, Perry staged a week-long campaign of intimidation that began fiercely with the firing of blank shots and culminated in ominous threats to destroy the nation. The Tokugawa Shogunate, stymied by indecision, finally conceded that Perry would be allowed ashore to deliver a letter demanding that Japan abandoned its protectionist policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Korean Reunification: the Dream and the Reality
    KOREAN REUNIFICATION: THE DREAM AND THE REALITY CHARLES S. LEE Conventional wisdom, both Korean and non-Korean, assumis the division of this strategicpeninsula to be temporary. Officially, the Korean War still has not ended but is in a state of armistice. Popular belief also accepts as true that the greatest obstacles to Korean reunification are the East-West rivalry and the balance of power in the North Pacific. Charles S..Lee, however, argues that domestic conditions in North and South Korea actually present the more serious hurdle - a hurdle unlikely to be disposed of too quickly. INTRODUCTION Talk of reunifying the Korean peninsula once again is grabbing headlines. Catalyzed by the South Korean student movement's search for a new issue, the months surrounding the 1988 Summer Olympic Games in Seoul featured a flurry of unofficial and official initiatives on reunification. The students were quick to seize this emotionally charged issue as their new rallying cry, for the nation's recent democratic reforms (including a direct and seemingly fair presidential election in 1987) effectively deprived them of their raison d'etre. By June last year, thousands of them were on the march to the border village 6f Pahmunjom for a "summit" meeting with their North Korean counterparts. Not to be upstaged, the South Korean government blocked the marchers with tear gas, and on July 7, announced a sweeping set of proposals for improving North-South relations, including the opening of trade between the two Koreas. Capping last summer's events was South Korean President Roh Tae Woo's October speech at the UN General Assembly, in which he called for his own summit meeting with North Korean President Kim II Sung.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Developments in the Public-Enterprise Sector of Korea
    This PDF is a selection from a published volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Governance, Regulation, and Privatization in the Asia-Pacific Region, NBER East Asia Seminar on Economics, Volume 12 Volume Author/Editor: Takatoshi Ito and Anne O. Krueger, editors Volume Publisher: University of Chicago Press Volume ISBN: 0-226-38679-1 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/ito_04-1 Conference Date: June 28-30, 2001 Publication Date: January 2004 Title: Recent Developments in the Public-Enterprise Sector of Korea Author: Il Chong Nam URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c10186 4 Recent Developments in the Public-Enterprise Sector of Korea Il Chong Nam 4.1 Introduction The government has always been the dominant figure in the corporate landscape of Korea. This is not surprising, considering that Korea has a relatively short history of capitalism and that the government played a de- cisive role in the fast industrialization process that began in the 1960s. An important aspect of the economic development strategy of the successive administrations was the creation of large firms in modern industries that realize economies of scale and scope. Many large commercial Korean firms were established by the chaebol system, which crucially depended on the government’s intervention in the financial market. Following the heavy and chemical industry drive of the mid-1970s, the automobile, shipbuild- ing, electronics, chemical, and oil refinery industries, as well as a host of others (including construction), were erected in this manner.1 The government’s involvement has been more direct in the remaining in- dustries that require large amounts of capital to start and maintain the business.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of EU and National Case Law
    e-Competitions Antitrust Case Laws e-Bulletin Utilities & Cartels Cartels in the utility sectors: An overview of EU and national case law ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES, BID RIGGING, CARTEL, EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION, JOINT-VENTURE, UTILITIES, SANCTIONS / FINES / PENALTIES, FOREWORD, JUDICIAL REVIEW, PRICE INCREASE Peter Alexiadis e-Com petitions Special Issue Utilities & Cartels I. Introduction A number of years have passed since I was invited to write the rst edition of the Foreword in e-Competition publication. Since that time, the case-law at EU and Member State level has expanded signicantly, with an ever-wider net being drawn over anti-competitive practices such as bid rigging and information sharing, on the one hand, and those problematic commercial practices featuring the active involvement of trade associations, on the other. We have also witnessed a range of cases where the dynamics of network industries have given rise to very particular restrictions of competition and where the public policy concerns justifying those restrictions are nely balanced. Finally, we have seen the inexorable rise of cartel prosecutions taking place in utility sectors which had, at least until recently, been associated with the abusive practices of dominant rms rather than incentives to collude. ​ The compendium of case reviews covered in this publication covers all of the above themes, and a host of important procedural issues ranging from whether Government bodies can be found guilty of distorting national law through their anti-competitive actions [1], the interaction between sector-specic regulation and competition policy [2], the extent to which the ‘single economic entity’ doctrine insulates anti-competitive agreements entered into between different members of the same corporate group [3], whether adherence to ‘standard terms’ used across an industry can be treated as collusion [4], and the roles played by sectoral enquiries [5], follow-on civil damages actions [6] and on-site inspections [7].
    [Show full text]