Front Matter

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Front Matter Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-85623-2 - An Introduction to General Relativity and Cosmology Jerzy Plebanski and Andrzej Krasinski Frontmatter More information An Introduction to General Relativity and Cosmology General relativity is a cornerstone of modern physics, and is of major importance in its applications to cosmology. Experts in the field Plebanski´ and Krasinski´ provide a thorough introduction to general relativity to guide the reader through complete derivations of the most important results. An Introduction to General Relativity and Cosmology is a unique text that presents a detailed coverage of cosmology as described by exact methods of relativity and inhomogeneous cosmological models. Geometric, physical and astrophysical properties of inhomogeneous cosmological models and advanced aspects of the Kerr metric are all systematically derived and clearly presented so that the reader can follow and verify all details. The book contains a detailed presentation of many topics that are not found in other textbooks. This textbook for advanced undergraduates and graduates of physics and astronomy will enable students to develop expertise in the mathematical techniques necessary to study general relativity. © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-85623-2 - An Introduction to General Relativity and Cosmology Jerzy Plebanski and Andrzej Krasinski Frontmatter More information An Introduction to General Relativity and Cosmology Jerzy Plebanski´ Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados Instituto Politécnico Nacional Apartado Postal 14-740, 07000 México D.F., Mexico Andrzej Krasinski´ Centrum Astronomiczne im. M. Kopernika, Polska Akademia Nauk, Bartycka 18, 00 716 Warszawa, Poland © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-85623-2 - An Introduction to General Relativity and Cosmology Jerzy Plebanski and Andrzej Krasinski Frontmatter More information cambridge university press Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao˜ Paulo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521856232 © J. Plebanski´ and A. Krasinski´ 2006 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2006 Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library ISBN-13 978-0-521-85623-2 hardback ISBN-10 0-521-85623-X hardback Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-85623-2 - An Introduction to General Relativity and Cosmology Jerzy Plebanski and Andrzej Krasinski Frontmatter More information Contents List of figures page xiii The scope of this text xvii Acknowledgements xix 1 How the theory of relativity came into being (a brief historical sketch) 1 1.1 Special versus general relativity 1 1.2 Space and inertia in Newtonian physics 1 1.3 Newton’s theory and the orbits of planets 2 1.4 The basic assumptions of general relativity 4 Part I Elements of differential geometry 7 2 A short sketch of 2-dimensional differential geometry 9 2.1 Constructing parallel straight lines in a flat space 9 2.2 Generalisation of the notion of parallelism to curved surfaces 10 3 Tensors, tensor densities 13 3.1 What are tensors good for? 13 3.2 Differentiable manifolds 13 3.3 Scalars 15 3.4 Contravariant vectors 15 3.5 Covariant vectors 16 3.6 Tensors of second rank 16 3.7 Tensor densities 17 3.8 Tensor densities of arbitrary rank 18 3.9 Algebraic properties of tensor densities 18 3.10 Mappings between manifolds 19 3.11 The Levi-Civita symbol 22 3.12 Multidimensional Kronecker deltas 23 3.13 Examples of applications of the Levi-Civita symbol and of the multidimensional Kronecker delta 24 3.14 Exercises 25 v © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-85623-2 - An Introduction to General Relativity and Cosmology Jerzy Plebanski and Andrzej Krasinski Frontmatter More information vi Contents 4 Covariant derivatives 26 4.1 Differentiation of tensors 26 4.2 Axioms of the covariant derivative 28 4.3 A field of bases on a manifold and scalar components of tensors 29 4.4 The affine connection 30 4.5 The explicit formula for the covariant derivative of tensor density fields 31 4.6 Exercises 32 5 Parallel transport and geodesic lines 33 5.1 Parallel transport 33 5.2 Geodesic lines 34 5.3 Exercises 35 6 The curvature of a manifold; flat manifolds 36 6.1 The commutator of second covariant derivatives 36 6.2 The commutator of directional covariant derivatives 38 6.3 The relation between curvature and parallel transport 39 6.4 Covariantly constant fields of vector bases 43 6.5 A torsion-free flat manifold 44 6.6 Parallel transport in a flat manifold 44 6.7 Geodesic deviation 45 6.8 Algebraic and differential identities obeyed by the curvature tensor 46 6.9 Exercises 47 7 Riemannian geometry 48 7.1 The metric tensor 48 7.2 Riemann spaces 49 7.3 The signature of a metric, degenerate metrics 49 7.4 Christoffel symbols 51 7.5 The curvature of a Riemann space 51 7.6 Flat Riemann spaces 52 7.7 Subspaces of a Riemann space 53 7.8 Flat Riemann spaces that are globally non-Euclidean 53 7.9 The Riemann curvature versus the normal curvature of a surface 54 7.10 The geodesic line as the line of extremal distance 55 7.11 Mappings between Riemann spaces 56 7.12 Conformally related Riemann spaces 56 7.13 Conformal curvature 58 7.14 Timelike, null and spacelike intervals in a 4-dimensional spacetime 61 7.15 Embeddings of Riemann spaces in Riemann spaces of higher dimension 63 7.16 The Petrov classification 70 7.17 Exercises 72 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-85623-2 - An Introduction to General Relativity and Cosmology Jerzy Plebanski and Andrzej Krasinski Frontmatter More information Contents vii 8 Symmetries of Riemann spaces, invariance of tensors 74 8.1 Symmetry transformations 74 8.2 The Killing equations 75 8.3 The connection between generators and the invariance transformations 77 8.4 Finding the Killing vector fields 78 8.5 Invariance of other tensor fields 79 8.6 The Lie derivative 80 8.7 The algebra of Killing vector fields 81 8.8 Surface-forming vector fields 81 8.9 Spherically symmetric 4-dimensional Riemann spaces 82 8.10 * Conformal Killing fields and their finite basis 86 8.11 * The maximal dimension of an invariance group 89 8.12 Exercises 91 9 Methods to calculate the curvature quickly – Cartan forms and algebraic computer programs 94 9.1 The basis of differential forms 94 9.2 The connection forms 95 9.3 The Riemann tensor 96 9.4 Using computers to calculate the curvature 98 9.5 Exercises 98 10 The spatially homogeneous Bianchi type spacetimes 99 10.1 The Bianchi classification of 3-dimensional Lie algebras 99 10.2 The dimension of the group versus the dimension of the orbit 104 10.3 Action of a group on a manifold 105 10.4 Groups acting transitively, homogeneous spaces 105 10.5 Invariant vector fields 106 10.6 The metrics of the Bianchi-type spacetimes 108 10.7 The isotropic Bianchi-type (Robertson–Walker) spacetimes 109 10.8 Exercises 112 11 * The Petrov classification by the spinor method 113 11.1 What is a spinor? 113 11.2 Translating spinors to tensors and vice versa 114 11.3 The spinor image of the Weyl tensor 116 11.4 The Petrov classification in the spinor representation 116 11.5 The Weyl spinor represented as a 3 × 3 complex matrix 117 11.6 The equivalence of the Penrose classes to the Petrov classes 119 11.7 The Petrov classification by the Debever method 120 11.8 Exercises 122 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-85623-2 - An Introduction to General Relativity and Cosmology Jerzy Plebanski and Andrzej Krasinski Frontmatter More information viii Contents Part II The theory of gravitation 123 12 The Einstein equations and the sources of a gravitational field 125 12.1 Why Riemannian geometry? 125 12.2 Local inertial frames 125 12.3 Trajectories of free motion in Einstein’s theory 126 12.4 Special relativity versus gravitation theory 129 12.5 The Newtonian limit of relativity 130 12.6 Sources of the gravitational field 130 12.7 The Einstein equations 131 12.8 Hilbert’s derivation of the Einstein equations 132 12.9 The Palatini variational principle 136 12.10 The asymptotically Cartesian coordinates and the asymptotically flat spacetime 136 12.11 The Newtonian limit of Einstein’s equations 136 12.12 Examples of sources in the Einstein equations: perfect fluid and dust 140 12.13 Equations of motion of a perfect fluid 143 12.14 The cosmological constant 144 12.15 An example of an exact solution of Einstein’s equations: a Bianchi type I spacetime with dust source 145 12.16 * Other gravitation theories 149 12.16.1 The Brans–Dicke theory 149 12.16.2 The Bergmann–Wagoner theory 150 12.16.3 The conformally invariant Canuto theory 150 12.16.4 The Einstein–Cartan theory 150
Recommended publications
  • 1 Textbooks and Monographs 2 Other Books 3 Main Research Papers
    ANDRZEJ KRASINSKI´ LIST OF ALL PUBLICATIONS (where no names are listed, A. K. is the sole author) 1 Textbooks and Monographs [1] 1. Inhomogeneous cosmological models [a monograph]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1997, 317 pp, ISBN 0 521 48180 5. Paperback re-edition 2006; electronic re-edition 2010. [2] 2. Jerzy Pleba´nskiand A. Krasi´nski,An introduction to general relativity and cos- mology [a textbook]. Cambridge University Press 2006, 534 pp, ISBN 0-521-85623-X. Paperback re-edition 2012. The list of corrections to errors and typos found (by Mr. Przemys law Jacewicz) after publication of the book is available from the web page: http://www.cambridge.org/gb/knowledge/isbn/item1173175/?site locale=en GB (click on \Resources" and then on \New errata") [3] 3. Krzysztof Bolejko, A. Krasi´nski,Charles Hellaby and Marie-No¨elleC´el´erier,Struc- tures in the Universe by exact methods { formation, evolution, interactions [a mono- graph]. Cambridge University Press 2010, 242 pp, ISBN 978-0-521-76914-3. 2 Other books [4] 1. A. Krasi´nski,George F. R. Ellis, Malcolm A. H. MacCallum (editors). Golden Oldies in general relativity. Hidden gems. Springer, Heidelberg 2013, 493 pp, ISBN 978-3-642-34504-3. 3 Main research papers [5] 1. Solutions of the Einstein field equations for a rotating perfect fluid, Part 1 - Presentation of the flow-stationary and vortex- homogeneous solutions. Acta Phys. Polon. B5, 411 (1974). [6] 2. Solutions of the Einstein field equations for a rotating perfect fluid, Part 2 - Properties of the flow-stationary and vortex- homogeneous solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • How Hilbert's Attempt to Unify Gravitation and Electromagnetism
    How Hilbert’s attempt to unify gravitation and electromagnetism failed completely, and a plausible resolution Victor Christianto*1 & Florentin Smarandache2 & Robert N. Boyd3 1Malang Institute of Agriculture, Indonesia 2Dept. Math. & Sci., Univ. of New Mexico, USA. Email: [email protected] 3 Consulting physicist for Princeton Biotechnology Corporation, Dept. Information Physics Research. Email: [email protected] *Email: [email protected]. URL: http://researchgate.net/profile/Victor_Christianto Abstract In the present paper, these authors argue on actual reasons why Hilbert’s axiomatic program to unify gravitation theory and electromagnetism failed completely. An outline of plausible resolution of this problem is given here, based on: a) Gödel’s incompleteness theorem, b) Newton’s aether stream model. And in another paper we will present our calculation of receding Moon from Earth based on such a matter creation hypothesis. More experiments and observations are called to verify this new hypothesis, albeit it is inspired from Newton’s theory himself. We hear within ourselves the constant cry: There is the problem, seek the solution. You can find it through pure thought. –D. Hilbert, The Problems of Mathematics Introduction First of all, it is known that Hilbert and Einstein were in race at 1915 to develop a new gravitation theory based on covariance principle.[1] While Einstein seemed to win the race at the time, Hilbert produced two communications which show that he was ahead of Einstein in term of unification of gravitation theory and electromagnetic theory. Hilbert started *Correspondence: Victor Christianto, Independent Researcher. Email: [email protected] 1 | P a g e with Mie’s electromagnetic theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Signature Change in the Black Hole Topology
    Classical Signature Change in the Black Hole Topology Charles Hellaby, Ariel Sumeruk and G.F.R. Ellis Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7700, South Africa E-mail: [email protected] Appeared in: Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 6, 211-38 (1997) gr-qc/9907042 Abstract Investigations of classical signature change have generally envisaged applications to cosmological models, usually a Friedmann-Lema^ıtre- Robertson-Walker model. The purpose has been to avoid the inevitable singularity of models with purely Lorentzian signature, replacing the neighbourhood of the big bang with an initial, singularity free region of Euclidean signture, and a signature change. We here show that signature change can also avoid the singularity of gravitational col- lapse. We investigate the process of re-birth of Schwarzschild type black holes, modelling it as a double signature change, joining two universes of Lorentzian signature through a Euclidean region which provides a `bounce'. We show that this process is viable both with and without matter present, but realistic models | which have the signature change surfaces hidden inside the horizons | require non- zero density. In fact the most realistic models are those that start as a finite cloud of collapsing matter, surrounded by vacuum. We consider how geodesics may be matched across a signature change surface, and conclude that the particle `masses' must jump in value. This scenario may be relevant to Smolin's recent proposal that a form of natural selection operates on the level of universes, which favours the type of universe we live in. Short Title: Signature Change in Black Holes PACS: 04.20.-q, 98.80.Bp, 11.30.-j 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Gravitational Collapse and the Information Loss Problem
    Gravitational Collapse and the Information Loss Problem Supervisors: Author: Dr. Amanda Weltman Alton Vanie Kesselly Prof. Charles Hellaby University of Cape Town A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Faculty of Science Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics University Of Cape Town The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town Declaration of Authorship I, Alton Vanie Kesselly, declare that this thesis titled, ‘Gravitational Collapse and the Information Loss Problem’ and the work presented in it are my own. I confirm that: • This work was done wholly or mainly while in candidature for the degree of Masters of Science by research at University of Cape Town. • Where any part of this thesis has previously been submitted for a degree or any other qualification at the University of Cape Town or any other institution, this has been clearly stated. • Where I have consulted the published work of others, this is always clearly at- tributed. • Where I have quoted from the work of others, the source is always given. With the exception of such quotations, this thesis is entirely my own work. • I have acknowledged all main sources of help. • Where the thesis is based on work done by myself jointly with others, I have made clear exactly what was done by others and what I have contributed myself.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrzej Krasi´Nski
    ANDRZEJ KRASINSKI´ CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF MAIN PAPERS (Note: The list includes research and review papers and technical reports; also those few that did not make it through refereeing or were not submitted for publication; it does not include popular articles and short notes) 1. Solutions of the Einstein field equations for a rotating perfect fluid, Part 1 - Presentation of the flow-stationary and vortex- homogeneous solutions. Acta Phys. Polon. B5, 411 (1974). 2. Solutions of the Einstein field equations for a rotating perfect fluid, Part 2 - Properties of the flow-stationary and vortex- homogeneous solutions. Acta Phys. Polon. B6, 223 (1975). 3. Solutions of the Einstein field equations for a rotating perfect fluid, part 3 - A survey of models of a rotating perfect fluid or dust. Acta Phys. Polon. B6, 239 (1975), also published in a largely expanded form as a preprint. 4. Some solutions of the Einstein field equations for a rotating perfect fluid distri- bution. J. Math. Phys. 16, 125 (1975). 5. Models of the Universe in general relativity (in Polish). Post¸epyAstronomii 23, 97 (1975). 6. Is the Sun spherical? (in Polish). Post¸epyAstronomii 23, 159 (1975). 7. A class of rotating and expanding Universes. In: 8th International Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation. University of Waterloo 1977, p. 216. 8. Ellipsoidal spacetimes. In: 8th International Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation. University of Waterloo 1977, p. 217. 9. A. Krasi´nski,Marek Perkowski, Symbolic algebraic computer programs, Part 1 - The LISP programming language (in Polish). Post¸epyAstronomii 25, 203 (1977). 10. A. Krasi´nski,Marek Perkowski, Symbolic algebraic computer programs, Part 2 - Applications and perspectives (in Polish).
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2006
    Vatican Observatory Annual Report 2006 Vatican Observatory (Castel Gandolfo) V-00120 Città del Vaticano Rome ITALY Vatican Observatory Research Group Steward Observatory University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 USA http://vaticanobservatory.org Vatican Observatory Publications Vatican Observatory Staff The following are permanent staff members of the Vatican Observatory, Castel Gandolfo, Italy, and the Vatican Observatory Research Group (VORG), Tucson, Arizona, USA. JOSÉ G. FUNES, , S.J., Director, Vatican Observatory JAMES J. BOWES, S.J., Superior, Jesuit Community, Tucson GIUSEPPE KOCH, S.J., Superior, Jesuit Community, Castel Gandolfo RICHARD P. BOYLE, S.J. ALESSANDRO OMIZZOLO JUAN CASANOVAS, S.J. WILLIAM R. STOEGER, S.J. GUY J. CONSOLMAGNO, S.J. Coordinator for Science and Theology Coordinator for Public Relations Programs CHRISTOPHER J. CORBALLY, S.J., ANDREW P. WHITMAN, S.J., Vice Director for VORG; Administrator VORG President, National Committee to International Astronomical Union Adjunct Scholars: GEORGE V. COYNE, S.J. EMMANUEL M. CARREIRA, S.J. JEAN-BAPTISTE KIKWAYA ELUO, S.J. LOUIS CARUANA, S.J. GIUSEPPE KOCH, S.J. ROBERT JANUSZ, S.J. Vice Director for Administration MICHAEL HELLER SABINO MAFFEO, S.J., GUSTAV TERES, S.J. Special Assistant to the Director Vatican Observatory Foundation Board of Directors Officers GEORGE V. COYNE, S.J., President BEN DALBY, Chairman of the Board CHRISTOPHER J. CORBALLY, S.J., First Vice President RICHARD P. BOYLE, S.J., Second Vice President WILLIAM R. STOEGER, S.J., Secretary MANUEL J. ESPINOZA, Treasurer Directors RENATO BOCCARDO JOSÉ G. FUNES, S.J. RICHARD P. BOYLE, S.J. JOHN B. HENKELS CHRISTOPHER J. CORBALLY, S.J. CHRISTOPHER P. HITCHCOCK GEORGE V.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents (Print)
    PERIODICALS PHYSICAL REVIEW D Postmaster send address changes to: For editorial and subscription correspondence, American Institute of Physics please see inside front cover Suite 1NO1 „ISSN: 0556-2821… 2 Huntington Quadrangle Melville, NY 11747-4502 THIRD SERIES, VOLUME 65, NUMBER 2 CONTENTS 15 JANUARY 2002 Physical Review D Editorial Policies and Practices . iii Physical Review D Information for Contributors . vii Guidelines for Estimating Length for Physical Review D . x RAPID COMMUNICATIONS Evidence against or for topological defects in the BOOMERanG data? (4 pages) . 021301͑R͒ F. R. Bouchet, P. Peter, A. Riazuelo, and M. Sakellariadou Lower bound on the local extragalactic magnetic ®eld (5 pages) . 021302͑R͒ Luis A. Anchordoqui and Haim Goldberg k-string tensions in SU(N) gauge theories (4 pages) . 021501͑R͒ Luigi Del Debbio, Haralambos Panagopoulos, Paolo Rossi, and Ettore Vicari Fixing the conformal window in QCD (5 pages) . 021701͑R͒ G. Grunberg Action for supergravity interacting with super-p-brane sources (5 pages) . 021901͑R͒ Igor A. Bandos, Jose A. de AzcaÂrraga, Jose M. Izquierdo, and Jerzy Lukierski ARTICLES Search for periodic gravitational wave sources with the Explorer detector (11 pages) . 022001 P. Astone, M. Bassan, P. Bonifazi, P. Carelli, E. Coccia, C. Cosmelli, S. D'Antonio, V. Fafone, S. Frasca, Y. Minenkov, I. Modena, G. Modestino, A. Moleti, G. V. Pallottino, M. A. Papa, G. Pizzella, L. Quintieri, F. Ronga, R. Terenzi, and M. Visco Conversion of conventional gravitational-wave interferometers into quantum nondemolition interferometers by modifying their input and/or output optics (31 pages) . 022002 H. J. Kimble, Yuri Levin, Andrey B. Matsko, Kip S. Thorne, and Sergey P.
    [Show full text]
  • VO Annual Report FINAL Pub 2000R.Pub
    1 ANNUAL REPORT 2005 Vatican Observatory Annual Report 2005 Vatican Observatory (Castel Gandolfo) V-00120 Città del Vaticano Rome ITALY Vatican Observatory Research Group Steward Observatory University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 USA http://vaticanobservatory.org Vatican Observatory Publications Vatican Observatory Staff The following are permanent staff members of the Vatican Observatory, Castel Gandolfo, Italy, and the Vatican Observatory Research Group (VORG), Tucson, Arizona, USA. GEORGE V. COYNE, S.J., Director, Vatican Observatory JAMES J. BOWES, S.J., Superior, Jesuit Community, Tucson GIUSEPPE KOCH, S.J., Superior, Jesuit Community, Castel Gandolfo RICHARD P. BOYLE, S.J. SABINO MAFFEO, S.J., JUAN CASANOVAS, S.J. Special Assistant to the Director GUY J. CONSOLMAGNO, S.J. ALESSANDRO OMIZZOLO CHRISTOPHER J. CORBALLY, S.J., WILLIAM R. STOEGER, S.J. Vice Director for VORG; ANDREW P. WHITMAN, S.J., President, National Committee to Administrator VORG International Astronomical Union JOSÉ G. FUNES, S.J. Adjunct Scholars: JEAN-BAPTISTE KIKWAYA, S.J. EMMANUEL M. CARREIRA, S.J. GIUSEPPE KOCH, S.J. LOUIS CARUANA, S.J. Vice Director for Administration ROBERT JANUSZ, S.J. MICHAEL HELLER GUSTAV TERES, S.J. Vatican Observatory Foundation Board of Directors Officers GEORGE V. COYNE, S.J., President BEN DALBY, Chairman of the Board CHRISTOPHER J. CORBALLY, S.J., First Vice President RICHARD P. BOYLE, S.J., Second Vice President WILLIAM R. STOEGER, S.J., Secretary MANUEL J. ESPINOZA, Treasurer Directors RENATO BOCCARDO JOSÉ G. FUNES, S.J. RICHARD P. BOYLE, S.J. JOHN B. HENKELS CHRISTOPHER J. CORBALLY, S.J. CHRISTOPHER P. HITCHCOCK GEORGE V. COYNE, S.J. JOHN B. HOLLYWOOD, S.J.
    [Show full text]
  • From Hilbert to Dilbert
    From Hilbert to Dilbert A non-orthodox approach to gravitation, psychosynthesis, economics, cosmology, and other issues Victor Christianto & Florentin Smarandache (editors) From Hilbert to Dilbert 1 From Hilbert to Dilbert A non-orthodox approach to gravitation, psychosynthesis, economics, cosmology, and other issues ISBN : Editors: • Victor Christianto, DDiv., Malang Institute of Agriculture (IPM), Indonesia. http://www.sci- 4God.com • Florentin Smarandache, PhD., Dept. Mathematics and Sciences, University of New Mexico, New Mexico, USA. Gallup, New Mexico 87301, USA; e-mail: [email protected] Publisher : Divine Publishing Jl. Sidomakmur No. 75 A Sengkaling Malang, INDONESIA 65151 Email: [email protected] ISBN : 978 - 1 - 59973 - 585 - 6 Cover design : d.v.n. project Layout : d.v.n. project No part of this book is allowed to be copied and distributed by any means, be it in print or electronically, without written permission from the Editors and/or the Publisher, except for citation and review purposes. 2 From Hilbert to Dilbert Dedication ~ A tribute to Mr. Scott Adams the creator of Dilbert’s cartoon series. To many people like us, Dilbert is the real anti-hero of this corporatocracym age… (our wish is that eminent directors such as Oliver Stone will someday create something like “Dilbert the Movie.” — don’t laugh, we’re serious) From Hilbert to Dilbert 3 4 From Hilbert to Dilbert Preface This book took an unconventional theme because we submit an unorthodox theme too. Karl Popper’s epistemology suggests that when the theory is refuted by observation, then it is time to look for a set of new approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephani Cosmology: Entropically Viable but Observationally Challenged
    Eur. Phys. J. C (2018) 78:405 https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5866-1 Regular Article - Theoretical Physics Stephani cosmology: entropically viable but observationally challenged YenChinOng1,2,a,e , S. Sedigheh Hashemi2,3,b,RuiAn2,4,c, Bin Wang1,2,d 1 Center for Gravitation and Cosmology, College of Physical Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China 2 School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China 3 Department of Physics, Shahid Beheshti University, G.C., Evin, Tehran 19839, Iran 4 Collaborative Innovation Center of IFSA (CICIFSA), Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China Received: 14 January 2018 / Accepted: 3 May 2018 / Published online: 23 May 2018 © The Author(s) 2018 Abstract Inhomogeneous cosmological models such as the the standard Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker Stephani universes could, in principle, provide an explana- (FLRW) cosmology that the Universe is homogeneous and tion for the observed accelerated expansion of the Universe. isotropic, this could well be an over simplification, since Working with a concrete, popular model of the Stephani cos- there exist inhomogeneities on scale less than 150 Mpc [4]. mology – the Stephani-D¸abrowski model, we found that it is (See also, [5].) It is therefore conceivable that inhomogene- entropically viable. We also comment on the energy condi- ity might affect the expansion rate of the Universe [6–13]. In tions and the two-sheeted geometry of the spacetime. How- fact, local inhomogeneities are important for several reasons. ever, similar to the LTB models, despite satisfying the holo- For example, even if there is indeed a cosmological constant, graphic principle, Stephani cosmology has difficulty satisfy- effects from local inhomogeneities would result in an effec- ing all the constraints from observations.
    [Show full text]
  • Thin Shells in General Relativity Without Junction Conditions: a Model for Galactic Rotation and the Discrete Sampling of Fields
    Thin shells in general relativity without junction conditions: A model for galactic rotation and the discrete sampling of fields By Kathleen A. Rosser Ka [email protected] (Published 3 October 2019) Interest in general relativistic treatments of thin matter shells has flourished over recent decades, most notably in connection with astrophysical and cosmological applications such as black hole matter accretion, spherical wormholes, bubble universes, and cosmic domain walls. In the present paper, an asymptotically exact solution to Einstein©s field equations for static ultra-thin spherical shells is derived using a continuous matter density distribution ρ(r) defined over all space. The matter density is modeled as a product of surface density μ0 and a continuous or broadened spherical delta function. Continuity over the full domain 0<r<∞ ensures unambiguous determination of both the metric and coordinates across the shell wall, obviating the need to patch interior and exterior solutions using junction conditions. A unique change of variable allows integration with asymptotic precision. It is found that ultra-thin shells smaller than the Schwarzschild radius can be used to model supermassive black holes believed to lie at the centers of galaxies, possibly accounting for the flattening of the galactic rotation curve as described by Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND). Concentric ultra-thin shells may also be used for discrete sampling of arbitrary spherical mass distributions with applications in cosmology. Ultra-thin shells are shown to exhibit constant interior time dilation. The exterior solution matches the Schwarzschild metric. General black shell horizons, and singularities are also discussed. split the universe into distinct spacetime regions [12-14].
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Signature Change in the Black Hole Topology
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server Classical Signature Change in the Black Hole Topology Charles Hellaby, Ariel Sumeruk and G.F.R. Ellis Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7700, South Africa E-mail: [email protected] Appeared in: Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 6, 211-38 (1997) gr-qc/9907042 Abstract Investigations of classical signature change have generally envis- aged applications to cosmological models, usually a Friedmann- Lema^ıtre-Robertson-Walker model. The purpose has been to avoid the inevitable singularity of models with purely Lorentzian signa- ture, replacing the neighbourhood of the big bang with an ini- tial, singularity free region of Euclidean signture, and a signature change. We here show that signature change can also avoid the singularity of gravitational collapse. We investigate the process of re-birth of Schwarzschild type black holes, modelling it as a dou- ble signature change, joining two universes of Lorentzian signature through a Euclidean region which provides a `bounce'. We show that this process is viable both with and without matter present, but realistic models | which have the signature change surfaces hidden inside the horizons | require non-zero density. In fact the most realistic models are those that start as a finite cloud of col- lapsing matter, surrounded by vacuum. We consider how geodesics may be matched across a signature change surface, and conclude that the particle `masses' must jump in value. This scenario may be relevant to Smolin's recent proposal that a form of natural se- lection operates on the level of universes, which favours the type of universe we live in.
    [Show full text]